Light Weapons Market by Product Type (Handguns, Machine Guns, Rifles), Action Type (Automatic, Bolt Action, Lever Action), Caliber, End User, Application, Sales Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Light Weapons Market was valued at USD 16.96 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 17.86 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.17%, reaching USD 25.40 billion by 2032.
A strategic orientation to the evolving small arms ecosystem that establishes the analytical framework for capability, policy, and procurement implications
The introduction frames the light weapons landscape through a pragmatic lens focused on capability, regulatory change, and end-user requirements. Recent years have seen rapid technological evolution in small arms design, materials, and modularity, prompting new procurement priorities across law enforcement, military, and civilian spheres. Simultaneously, the policy environment and international trade tensions have heightened scrutiny of supply chains and cross-border transfers, creating an imperative for stakeholders to reassess sourcing, compliance, and lifecycle support strategies.
This report synthesizes patterns across product innovation, procurement practice, and operational use cases to provide a coherent orientation for executives, procurement officers, and program managers. It emphasizes the interplay between tactical needs and commercial constraints, highlighting how interoperability, sustainment, and training considerations drive acquisition choices. By establishing this foundation, the introduction clarifies the analytical approach used throughout the study and sets expectations for how subsequent sections translate technical, regulatory, and market dynamics into strategic implications.
How technological innovation, contracting evolution, and regulatory transparency are jointly redefining competitive advantage and procurement preferences in small arms
Transformative shifts are reshaping how light weapons are designed, procured, and employed across sectors, driven by advances in materials, modularity, and sensor integration. Weapon manufacturers are increasingly focusing on systems that support rapid reconfiguration, improved ergonomics, and reduced logistics burdens, while electronic adjuncts such as aiming aids and integrated diagnostics augment lethality and sustainment. These product-level innovations are accompanied by changes in contracting models; governments and agencies prefer performance-based logistics and longer-term service agreements that emphasize readiness rather than unit price.
Concurrently, regulatory and societal pressures are prompting transparency and traceability initiatives across both civilian and institutional channels. The rise of digital documentation, end-to-end serialization, and enhanced background-check mechanisms is shifting how distribution networks operate. Geopolitical realignments and export control adjustments have also accelerated regional industrialization efforts, with producing nations seeking to localize manufacturing capabilities. Taken together, these shifts create a more complex competitive environment where agility, compliance, and aftermarket services determine long-term viability.
An analysis of how the 2025 United States tariff measures prompted supply chain diversification, procurement recalibration, and a renewed focus on resilience across the value chain
United States tariff actions implemented in 2025 introduced a new set of constraints and incentives that reverberate across procurement cycles, supplier networks, and product lifecycles. Tariff adjustments prompted importing entities to reassess supplier portfolios and consider nearshoring or expansion of domestic production capabilities to mitigate cost volatility and customs-related delays. At the same time, suppliers outside the affected jurisdiction repositioned their logistical hubs and distribution strategies to remain competitive in key markets, often prioritizing value-added services and local partnerships.
Operationally, defense and law enforcement agencies reacted by modifying procurement specifications to favor platforms with lower sustainment dependencies on tariff-impacted components. This transition favored suppliers offering integrated sustainment packages and longer warranty support, helping reduce the total cost of ownership amid tariff-driven supply uncertainty. In parallel, commercial and civilian channels saw shifts in retail pricing dynamics and distribution models, with some retailers emphasizing inventory buffering and diversified sourcing to minimize margin compression. Ultimately, the cumulative impact of the tariff measures accelerated strategic reassessment across the value chain, catalyzing supply chain diversification, contractual innovation, and a renewed focus on resilience rather than short-term cost savings.
Comprehensive segmentation-driven insights that clarify divergent demand patterns by end user, product architecture, application, action mechanism, sales channel, and caliber preferences
Segmentation insights reveal differentiated demand drivers and operational priorities across end users, product types, applications, action types, sales channels, and caliber categories. When considering end user distinctions among Civilian, Law Enforcement, and Military buyers, procurement timelines, regulatory scrutiny, and training requirements diverge markedly; civilian purchases emphasize personal security and sporting use cases, law enforcement focuses on duty reliability and controlled deployment, and military acquisition centers on force interoperability and sustainment across theaters.
Product type segmentation across Handguns, Machine Guns, Rifles, Shotguns, and Submachine Guns exposes varied development and aftermarket profiles. The Handguns category, comprising Revolver and Semi Automatic Pistol variants, attracts demand for concealed-carry ergonomics and modular safety systems. Machine Guns, including Heavy Machine Gun, Light Machine Gun, and Medium Machine Gun subtypes, align with sustained-fire and platform-integration requirements. Rifle families such as Assault Rifle, Battle Rifle, Designated Marksman Rifle, and Sniper Rifle each serve distinct engagement ranges and precision demands. Shotgun formats-Break Action, Pump Action, and Semi Automatic-address close-quarters and breaching roles, while Submachine Guns differentiated by Closed Bolt and Open Bolt designs continue to serve specialized tactical units.
Application-based segmentation into Defense, Hunting, Personal Security, and Sporting highlights differing procurement rationales. Defense use differentiates between Combat and Training needs, requiring distinct reliability and lifecycle support. Hunting divides into Big Game and Small Game requirements where caliber and barrel characteristics matter, whereas Personal Security splits between Civilian Self Defense and Private Security needs driven by concealability and legal frameworks. Sporting applications separate Competition and Target Shooting, prioritizing accuracy, trigger refinement, and regulatory compliance.
Action type segmentation across Automatic, Bolt Action, Lever Action, Pump Action, and Semi Automatic reveals mechanical trade-offs; Automatic systems further bifurcate into Gas Operated and Recoil Operated mechanisms, and Semi Automatic designs likewise split by Gas Operated and Recoil Operated modalities, influencing maintenance profiles and recoil management strategies. Sales channel segmentation distinguishing Direct Purchase, OEM Supply, and Retail Sales outlines distribution pathways; Direct Purchase differentiates Government Contract and Private Purchase approaches, OEM Supply divides into Tier 1 Supplier and Tier 2 Supplier relationships, and Retail Sales includes Brick And Mortar and Online fulfillment methods that shape customer experience and compliance obligations. Finally, caliber segmentation into Large Caliber, Medium Caliber, and Small Caliber maps directly to application suitability, penetration characteristics, and ammunition logistics considerations.
Regional production, procurement, and regulatory variations that require suppliers to tailor market-entry and compliance strategies across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics continue to shape production strategies, procurement priorities, and regulatory frameworks across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific territories. In the Americas, established industrial bases and advanced aftermarket ecosystems coexist with rising interest in localization and performance-based logistics to support long deployment cycles and law enforcement modernization programs. This region’s regulatory environment varies significantly by jurisdiction, requiring suppliers to be adept at navigating state-level restrictions and liability considerations while offering modularity that meets diverse operational needs.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, the interplay between export control regimes, regional security concerns, and growing indigenous manufacturing ambitions defines much of the strategic posture. Governments in this region often prioritize interoperability with alliance partners and procurement transparency, driving demand for certified supply chains and traceable components. In the Asia-Pacific, expanding defense budgets and an emphasis on regional self-reliance have spurred investment in local capability development, dual-use technologies, and cooperative ventures that reduce dependence on long-distance logistics. Collectively, these regional forces demand that suppliers adopt flexible market-entry strategies, regional partnerships, and compliance-first approaches to capitalize on varying operational and regulatory requirements.
How leading manufacturers, tiered suppliers, and specialist innovators are differentiating through integrated services, material advances, and lifecycle sustainment strategies
Insights into leading companies and supplier types emphasize strategic differentiation through integrated services, modular product lines, and robust aftermarket capabilities. Market leaders are prioritizing investments in materials science, digital integration, and manufacturing flexibility to support rapid configuration changes for diverse customers. Concurrently, specialist manufacturers that focus on niche product families or high-precision platforms are capturing value by offering bespoke solutions and deep engineering partnerships for defense and competitive sporting users.
Tiered supplier relationships are becoming more pronounced, with Tier 1 partners offering system integration, certification support, and lifecycle sustainment, while Tier 2 suppliers provide critical subassemblies and material innovations. Companies that excel at certification compliance, track-and-trace capabilities, and long-term servicing agreements gain preferential positioning with institutional buyers who require predictable readiness. Additionally, emerging entrants and SMEs that leverage advanced manufacturing techniques-such as additive processes and lightweight alloys-are disrupting incumbent cost and performance benchmarks, prompting incumbents to pursue strategic alliances, technology licensing, and targeted acquisitions to maintain competitiveness.
Practical strategic priorities for manufacturers and suppliers to enhance resilience, capture life-cycle value, and align product portfolios with modern procurement expectations
Industry leaders should act decisively along several fronts to strengthen resilience, capture higher-value opportunities, and align with evolving procurement expectations. First, prioritize supply chain diversification and nearshoring strategies to mitigate tariff and logistics exposure while ensuring continuity for critical components. Parallel to this, invest in traceability and serialization systems that meet rising demands for accountable transfers and regulatory compliance, thereby reducing friction in both institutional and civilian channels.
Second, shift commercial models toward performance-based logistics and extended sustainment packages that emphasize readiness metrics rather than simple unit pricing. This will appeal to defense and law enforcement buyers focused on lifecycle availability. Third, accelerate adoption of modular designs and digital augmentation-such as integrated diagnostics and predictive maintenance-to lower total lifecycle costs and enhance field serviceability. Finally, cultivate regional partnerships and co-development agreements to access local markets and align with procurement offset requirements; these collaborations should be structured to transfer capability while protecting core intellectual property, enabling scalable manufacturing footprints without compromising strategic advantages.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical analysis, and supply chain mapping to ground actionable insights in operational realities
The research methodology integrates a multi-layered approach combining primary qualitative interviews, technical specification analysis, and comprehensive supply chain mapping to ensure robust, actionable findings. Interviews with procurement officials, program managers, and operational users provided first-hand perspectives on acquisition priorities, sustainment challenges, and emergent capability requirements. These qualitative inputs were cross-referenced with publicly available procurement documents, technical standards, and manufacturer specifications to validate capability claims and identify gaps between marketed features and operational performance.
Supply chain mapping assessed component sourcing, logistics pathways, and supplier concentration risks, enabling scenario analysis of tariff and disruption impacts. The study also applied comparative case analysis of procurement programs across jurisdictions to illustrate how regulatory regimes and contracting models influence vendor selection and contractual terms. Wherever technical trade-offs were relevant, the research team examined engineering documentation and maintenance manuals to quantify support and lifecycle implications. This mixed-methods approach ensures that recommendations are grounded in operational realities and aligned with the needs of procurement and program leadership.
Concluding synthesis that aligns technological, regulatory, and strategic imperatives to guide procurement and product development decisions for sustained operational readiness
In conclusion, the light weapons landscape is undergoing a period of structural evolution where technological innovation, regulatory pressures, and geopolitical shifts intersect to redefine procurement priorities and supplier competitiveness. Organizations that invest in modular product design, integrated sustainment services, and robust compliance regimes will be better positioned to meet diverse end-user needs while mitigating exposure to tariff and logistics volatility. The cumulative effects of policy changes and trade measures underscore the importance of supply chain visibility and strategic partnerships that enable rapid tactical adaptation.
Moving forward, the imperative for decision-makers is to balance near-term operational readiness with longer-term capability investment, ensuring that procurement choices support both current missions and anticipated future requirements. By aligning product development, contracting approaches, and regional engagement strategies, manufacturers and institutional buyers can create resilient, cost-effective pathways to sustain capability over multi-year horizons. These conclusions provide a pragmatic roadmap for stakeholders seeking to translate present trends into durable competitive and operational advantage.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic orientation to the evolving small arms ecosystem that establishes the analytical framework for capability, policy, and procurement implications
The introduction frames the light weapons landscape through a pragmatic lens focused on capability, regulatory change, and end-user requirements. Recent years have seen rapid technological evolution in small arms design, materials, and modularity, prompting new procurement priorities across law enforcement, military, and civilian spheres. Simultaneously, the policy environment and international trade tensions have heightened scrutiny of supply chains and cross-border transfers, creating an imperative for stakeholders to reassess sourcing, compliance, and lifecycle support strategies.
This report synthesizes patterns across product innovation, procurement practice, and operational use cases to provide a coherent orientation for executives, procurement officers, and program managers. It emphasizes the interplay between tactical needs and commercial constraints, highlighting how interoperability, sustainment, and training considerations drive acquisition choices. By establishing this foundation, the introduction clarifies the analytical approach used throughout the study and sets expectations for how subsequent sections translate technical, regulatory, and market dynamics into strategic implications.
How technological innovation, contracting evolution, and regulatory transparency are jointly redefining competitive advantage and procurement preferences in small arms
Transformative shifts are reshaping how light weapons are designed, procured, and employed across sectors, driven by advances in materials, modularity, and sensor integration. Weapon manufacturers are increasingly focusing on systems that support rapid reconfiguration, improved ergonomics, and reduced logistics burdens, while electronic adjuncts such as aiming aids and integrated diagnostics augment lethality and sustainment. These product-level innovations are accompanied by changes in contracting models; governments and agencies prefer performance-based logistics and longer-term service agreements that emphasize readiness rather than unit price.
Concurrently, regulatory and societal pressures are prompting transparency and traceability initiatives across both civilian and institutional channels. The rise of digital documentation, end-to-end serialization, and enhanced background-check mechanisms is shifting how distribution networks operate. Geopolitical realignments and export control adjustments have also accelerated regional industrialization efforts, with producing nations seeking to localize manufacturing capabilities. Taken together, these shifts create a more complex competitive environment where agility, compliance, and aftermarket services determine long-term viability.
An analysis of how the 2025 United States tariff measures prompted supply chain diversification, procurement recalibration, and a renewed focus on resilience across the value chain
United States tariff actions implemented in 2025 introduced a new set of constraints and incentives that reverberate across procurement cycles, supplier networks, and product lifecycles. Tariff adjustments prompted importing entities to reassess supplier portfolios and consider nearshoring or expansion of domestic production capabilities to mitigate cost volatility and customs-related delays. At the same time, suppliers outside the affected jurisdiction repositioned their logistical hubs and distribution strategies to remain competitive in key markets, often prioritizing value-added services and local partnerships.
Operationally, defense and law enforcement agencies reacted by modifying procurement specifications to favor platforms with lower sustainment dependencies on tariff-impacted components. This transition favored suppliers offering integrated sustainment packages and longer warranty support, helping reduce the total cost of ownership amid tariff-driven supply uncertainty. In parallel, commercial and civilian channels saw shifts in retail pricing dynamics and distribution models, with some retailers emphasizing inventory buffering and diversified sourcing to minimize margin compression. Ultimately, the cumulative impact of the tariff measures accelerated strategic reassessment across the value chain, catalyzing supply chain diversification, contractual innovation, and a renewed focus on resilience rather than short-term cost savings.
Comprehensive segmentation-driven insights that clarify divergent demand patterns by end user, product architecture, application, action mechanism, sales channel, and caliber preferences
Segmentation insights reveal differentiated demand drivers and operational priorities across end users, product types, applications, action types, sales channels, and caliber categories. When considering end user distinctions among Civilian, Law Enforcement, and Military buyers, procurement timelines, regulatory scrutiny, and training requirements diverge markedly; civilian purchases emphasize personal security and sporting use cases, law enforcement focuses on duty reliability and controlled deployment, and military acquisition centers on force interoperability and sustainment across theaters.
Product type segmentation across Handguns, Machine Guns, Rifles, Shotguns, and Submachine Guns exposes varied development and aftermarket profiles. The Handguns category, comprising Revolver and Semi Automatic Pistol variants, attracts demand for concealed-carry ergonomics and modular safety systems. Machine Guns, including Heavy Machine Gun, Light Machine Gun, and Medium Machine Gun subtypes, align with sustained-fire and platform-integration requirements. Rifle families such as Assault Rifle, Battle Rifle, Designated Marksman Rifle, and Sniper Rifle each serve distinct engagement ranges and precision demands. Shotgun formats-Break Action, Pump Action, and Semi Automatic-address close-quarters and breaching roles, while Submachine Guns differentiated by Closed Bolt and Open Bolt designs continue to serve specialized tactical units.
Application-based segmentation into Defense, Hunting, Personal Security, and Sporting highlights differing procurement rationales. Defense use differentiates between Combat and Training needs, requiring distinct reliability and lifecycle support. Hunting divides into Big Game and Small Game requirements where caliber and barrel characteristics matter, whereas Personal Security splits between Civilian Self Defense and Private Security needs driven by concealability and legal frameworks. Sporting applications separate Competition and Target Shooting, prioritizing accuracy, trigger refinement, and regulatory compliance.
Action type segmentation across Automatic, Bolt Action, Lever Action, Pump Action, and Semi Automatic reveals mechanical trade-offs; Automatic systems further bifurcate into Gas Operated and Recoil Operated mechanisms, and Semi Automatic designs likewise split by Gas Operated and Recoil Operated modalities, influencing maintenance profiles and recoil management strategies. Sales channel segmentation distinguishing Direct Purchase, OEM Supply, and Retail Sales outlines distribution pathways; Direct Purchase differentiates Government Contract and Private Purchase approaches, OEM Supply divides into Tier 1 Supplier and Tier 2 Supplier relationships, and Retail Sales includes Brick And Mortar and Online fulfillment methods that shape customer experience and compliance obligations. Finally, caliber segmentation into Large Caliber, Medium Caliber, and Small Caliber maps directly to application suitability, penetration characteristics, and ammunition logistics considerations.
Regional production, procurement, and regulatory variations that require suppliers to tailor market-entry and compliance strategies across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics continue to shape production strategies, procurement priorities, and regulatory frameworks across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific territories. In the Americas, established industrial bases and advanced aftermarket ecosystems coexist with rising interest in localization and performance-based logistics to support long deployment cycles and law enforcement modernization programs. This region’s regulatory environment varies significantly by jurisdiction, requiring suppliers to be adept at navigating state-level restrictions and liability considerations while offering modularity that meets diverse operational needs.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, the interplay between export control regimes, regional security concerns, and growing indigenous manufacturing ambitions defines much of the strategic posture. Governments in this region often prioritize interoperability with alliance partners and procurement transparency, driving demand for certified supply chains and traceable components. In the Asia-Pacific, expanding defense budgets and an emphasis on regional self-reliance have spurred investment in local capability development, dual-use technologies, and cooperative ventures that reduce dependence on long-distance logistics. Collectively, these regional forces demand that suppliers adopt flexible market-entry strategies, regional partnerships, and compliance-first approaches to capitalize on varying operational and regulatory requirements.
How leading manufacturers, tiered suppliers, and specialist innovators are differentiating through integrated services, material advances, and lifecycle sustainment strategies
Insights into leading companies and supplier types emphasize strategic differentiation through integrated services, modular product lines, and robust aftermarket capabilities. Market leaders are prioritizing investments in materials science, digital integration, and manufacturing flexibility to support rapid configuration changes for diverse customers. Concurrently, specialist manufacturers that focus on niche product families or high-precision platforms are capturing value by offering bespoke solutions and deep engineering partnerships for defense and competitive sporting users.
Tiered supplier relationships are becoming more pronounced, with Tier 1 partners offering system integration, certification support, and lifecycle sustainment, while Tier 2 suppliers provide critical subassemblies and material innovations. Companies that excel at certification compliance, track-and-trace capabilities, and long-term servicing agreements gain preferential positioning with institutional buyers who require predictable readiness. Additionally, emerging entrants and SMEs that leverage advanced manufacturing techniques-such as additive processes and lightweight alloys-are disrupting incumbent cost and performance benchmarks, prompting incumbents to pursue strategic alliances, technology licensing, and targeted acquisitions to maintain competitiveness.
Practical strategic priorities for manufacturers and suppliers to enhance resilience, capture life-cycle value, and align product portfolios with modern procurement expectations
Industry leaders should act decisively along several fronts to strengthen resilience, capture higher-value opportunities, and align with evolving procurement expectations. First, prioritize supply chain diversification and nearshoring strategies to mitigate tariff and logistics exposure while ensuring continuity for critical components. Parallel to this, invest in traceability and serialization systems that meet rising demands for accountable transfers and regulatory compliance, thereby reducing friction in both institutional and civilian channels.
Second, shift commercial models toward performance-based logistics and extended sustainment packages that emphasize readiness metrics rather than simple unit pricing. This will appeal to defense and law enforcement buyers focused on lifecycle availability. Third, accelerate adoption of modular designs and digital augmentation-such as integrated diagnostics and predictive maintenance-to lower total lifecycle costs and enhance field serviceability. Finally, cultivate regional partnerships and co-development agreements to access local markets and align with procurement offset requirements; these collaborations should be structured to transfer capability while protecting core intellectual property, enabling scalable manufacturing footprints without compromising strategic advantages.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical analysis, and supply chain mapping to ground actionable insights in operational realities
The research methodology integrates a multi-layered approach combining primary qualitative interviews, technical specification analysis, and comprehensive supply chain mapping to ensure robust, actionable findings. Interviews with procurement officials, program managers, and operational users provided first-hand perspectives on acquisition priorities, sustainment challenges, and emergent capability requirements. These qualitative inputs were cross-referenced with publicly available procurement documents, technical standards, and manufacturer specifications to validate capability claims and identify gaps between marketed features and operational performance.
Supply chain mapping assessed component sourcing, logistics pathways, and supplier concentration risks, enabling scenario analysis of tariff and disruption impacts. The study also applied comparative case analysis of procurement programs across jurisdictions to illustrate how regulatory regimes and contracting models influence vendor selection and contractual terms. Wherever technical trade-offs were relevant, the research team examined engineering documentation and maintenance manuals to quantify support and lifecycle implications. This mixed-methods approach ensures that recommendations are grounded in operational realities and aligned with the needs of procurement and program leadership.
Concluding synthesis that aligns technological, regulatory, and strategic imperatives to guide procurement and product development decisions for sustained operational readiness
In conclusion, the light weapons landscape is undergoing a period of structural evolution where technological innovation, regulatory pressures, and geopolitical shifts intersect to redefine procurement priorities and supplier competitiveness. Organizations that invest in modular product design, integrated sustainment services, and robust compliance regimes will be better positioned to meet diverse end-user needs while mitigating exposure to tariff and logistics volatility. The cumulative effects of policy changes and trade measures underscore the importance of supply chain visibility and strategic partnerships that enable rapid tactical adaptation.
Moving forward, the imperative for decision-makers is to balance near-term operational readiness with longer-term capability investment, ensuring that procurement choices support both current missions and anticipated future requirements. By aligning product development, contracting approaches, and regional engagement strategies, manufacturers and institutional buyers can create resilient, cost-effective pathways to sustain capability over multi-year horizons. These conclusions provide a pragmatic roadmap for stakeholders seeking to translate present trends into durable competitive and operational advantage.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
182 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-enabled fire control modules in infantry assault rifles for improved accuracy
- 5.2. Adoption of polymer-cased telemetric ammunition to reduce soldier weight burden and waste
- 5.3. Expansion of modular rail systems for quick customization of light weapons on the battlefield
- 5.4. Increasing use of carbon nanotube composite barrels to enhance durability and reduce recoil
- 5.5. Growth of 3D-printed upper receivers and accessory mounts for rapid weapon prototyping
- 5.6. Surge in demand for suppressor-ready carbines tailored for close-quarters urban combat scenarios
- 5.7. Development of caseless ammunition belts for squad automatic weapons to streamline logistics
- 5.8. Deployment of unmanned ground vehicles equipped with stabilized remote light weapon stations
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Light Weapons Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Handguns
- 8.1.1. Revolver
- 8.1.2. Semi Automatic Pistol
- 8.2. Machine Guns
- 8.2.1. Heavy Machine Gun
- 8.2.2. Light Machine Gun
- 8.2.3. Medium Machine Gun
- 8.3. Rifles
- 8.3.1. Assault Rifle
- 8.3.2. Battle Rifle
- 8.3.3. Designated Marksman Rifle
- 8.3.4. Sniper Rifle
- 8.4. Shotguns
- 8.4.1. Break Action
- 8.4.2. Pump Action
- 8.4.3. Semi Automatic
- 8.5. Submachine Guns
- 8.5.1. Closed Bolt
- 8.5.2. Open Bolt
- 9. Light Weapons Market, by Action Type
- 9.1. Automatic
- 9.1.1. Gas Operated
- 9.1.2. Recoil Operated
- 9.2. Bolt Action
- 9.3. Lever Action
- 9.4. Pump Action
- 9.5. Semi Automatic
- 9.5.1. Gas Operated
- 9.5.2. Recoil Operated
- 10. Light Weapons Market, by Caliber
- 10.1. Large Caliber
- 10.2. Medium Caliber
- 10.3. Small Caliber
- 11. Light Weapons Market, by End User
- 11.1. Civilian
- 11.2. Law Enforcement
- 11.3. Military
- 12. Light Weapons Market, by Application
- 12.1. Defense
- 12.1.1. Combat
- 12.1.2. Training
- 12.2. Hunting
- 12.2.1. Big Game
- 12.2.2. Small Game
- 12.3. Personal Security
- 12.3.1. Civilian Self Defense
- 12.3.2. Private Security
- 12.4. Sporting
- 12.4.1. Competition
- 12.4.2. Target Shooting
- 13. Light Weapons Market, by Sales Channel
- 13.1. Offline
- 13.2. Online
- 14. Light Weapons Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Light Weapons Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Light Weapons Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. FN Herstal S.A.
- 17.3.2. Heckler & Koch GmbH
- 17.3.3. Kalashnikov Concern JSC
- 17.3.4. SIG SAUER GmbH & Co. KG
- 17.3.5. Fabbrica d'Armi Pietro Beretta S.p.A.
- 17.3.6. Colt's Manufacturing Company, LLC
- 17.3.7. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
- 17.3.8. Israel Weapon Industries Ltd.
- 17.3.9. Česká zbrojovka a.s.
- 17.3.10. Rheinmetall AG
- 17.3.11. China North Industries Group Corporation Limited
- 17.3.12. ST Engineering Land Systems Ltd
- 17.3.13. BAE Systems plc
- 17.3.14. Daniel Defense, Inc.
- 17.3.15. Savage Arms, Inc.
- 17.3.16. General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems
- 17.3.17. Thales S.A.
- 17.3.18. Browning Arms Company
- 17.3.19. RemArms, LLC
- 17.3.20. Bushmaster Firearms International LLC
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
