Lactic Acid Market by Source (Natural, Synthetic), State (Liquid, Powder), Grade, Form, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Lactic Acid Market was valued at USD 5.25 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 5.77 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 10.29%, reaching USD 11.50 billion by 2032.
An authoritative introduction that situates lactic acid as a platform molecule bridging sustainable production advances, regulatory complexity, and diverse industrial applications
Lactic acid occupies a pivotal role in contemporary chemical and biochemical value chains, serving as a versatile intermediate and an end-use ingredient across food, personal care, pharmaceuticals, and industrial applications. The substance is produced through biological fermentation and chemical synthesis, and recent advances in fermentation technologies, feedstock diversification, and catalyst development have reshaped production economics and quality parameters. Beyond raw production, the downstream processing of lactic acid into derivatives such as polylactic acid and lactylates has expanded its relevance to sustainable materials and formulatory disciplines.
Within supply chains, logistics, purity specifications, and consistent quality are primary determinants of commercial utility. Producers and formulators increasingly prioritize traceability of feedstocks and the environmental profile of production routes. Regulatory considerations continue to evolve, particularly where lactic acid interfaces with food safety, cosmetic regulation, and pharmaceutical excipient standards. As stakeholders respond to these dynamics, strategic priorities include securing feedstock flexibility, optimizing fermentation yield, and ensuring compliance across geographies. This introduction frames lactic acid as both a commodity chemical and a platform molecule whose trajectory is shaped by technological innovation, regulatory shifts, and the evolving priorities of downstream industries.
A concise analysis of the sectoral transformation revealing technological, regulatory, and supply chain shifts that are redefining lactic acid production and application dynamics
The lactic acid landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology, sustainability expectations, and changing end-use demand. Fermentation platforms have moved from first-generation carbohydrate feedstocks to second-generation and waste-derived substrates, enabling producers to reduce reliance on conventional sugars while improving carbon intensity. Simultaneously, improvements in strain engineering, process intensification, and in situ downstream separation have lowered operating costs and increased product consistency. These technical advances have accelerated the viability of biobased lactic acid as a feedstock for biodegradable polymers, which in turn has stimulated investment in integrated production and polymerization facilities.
Parallel to technological change, regulatory and procurement frameworks are elevating lifecycle considerations. Corporate buyers and institutional procurement teams are increasingly requiring supply chain transparency and robust environmental metrics, prompting producers to demonstrate emissions performance and responsible sourcing. In product markets, formulators are favoring multifunctional ingredients, placing a premium on lactic acid grades that combine purity with functional benefits. As a result, strategic alliances between chemical firms, polymer producers, and brand owners have become more common, aligning investment and commercial strategies around supply security and product sustainability. Looking ahead, these shifts will reinforce differentiation between producers that can deliver validated sustainability credentials and those tied to legacy production models.
An incisive look at how the 2025 United States tariff measures reshaped sourcing, supply chain resilience, and investment decisions across lactic acid value chains
United States tariff actions in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for global lactic acid flows and sourcing strategies. Tariff adjustments raised input costs for certain import pathways, prompting downstream buyers to reassess supplier portfolios and sourcing geographies. In response, some manufacturers explored closer regional sourcing or reshoring of specific process steps to mitigate tariff exposure and reduce transit risk. These operational responses were also accompanied by contractual renegotiations as buyers and suppliers sought to share or reallocate cost impacts through price, payment terms, and longer-term offtake agreements.
Beyond immediate cost transmission, the tariff environment influenced investment timing and capital allocation. Firms evaluating new capacity factored in policy volatility, accelerating investments in domestic production where incentives and predictable policy frameworks supported longer-term returns. Meanwhile, exporters and foreign producers adapted by redirecting volumes to alternative markets with more stable access or by pursuing value-added partnerships that minimized the tariffable content of shipments. Overall, the 2025 tariff environment highlighted the strategic importance of flexible supply chains, diversified supplier bases, and the use of contractual and operational hedges to preserve continuity of supply and control landed costs.
Segment-driven insights that explain how source, physical state, grade, and stereochemical form determine lactic acid’s functional use cases and commercial positioning
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated demand drivers and technical requirements across source, state, grade, and form categories. Production sourced from natural routes-fermentation-is increasingly contrasted with synthetic routes, with buyers choosing based on purity, cost, and sustainability preferences. Liquid and powder states address distinct logistical and formulatory needs; liquid grades favor immediate incorporation in wet processing lines, while powder forms support dry blending and extended shelf life. Grade differentiation between food and industrial uses guides compliance and documentation requirements, with food-grade materials requiring stricter traceability and certification compared with many industrial-grade applications.
Form-level segmentation-D-lactic acid, DL-lactic acid, and L-lactic acid-introduces further nuance through stereochemistry and application-specific behavior. D-lactic acid finds applications across food and beverages, industrial processes, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics and personal care where its stereochemical attributes are desired. DL-lactic acid serves diverse formulations spanning cosmetics and personal care, food and beverages, industrial uses, and pharmaceutical roles, offering a racemic option for formulators. L-lactic acid similarly supports cosmetics and personal care, food and beverages, industrial, and pharmaceutical applications, and its stereochemical purity is often critical for polymerization and certain bioactive applications. This segmentation underscores the necessity for producers and buyers to align product specification, certification, and supply flexibility with end-use performance expectations.
Regional perspective that contrasts production, regulatory pressures, and demand drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific to reveal strategic implications
Regional dynamics shape production footprints, trade flows, and regulatory expectations across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, a combination of feedstock availability, established fermentation expertise, and evolving sustainability commitments has supported both legacy producers and emergent bioprocessors. Procurement teams in the region frequently prioritize logistical reliability and localized production to shorten lead times and lower supply chain complexity. Transitioning to more sustainable feedstocks has become a priority among corporate buyers, which in turn pressures suppliers to demonstrate demonstrable improvements in environmental metrics.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency and circularity commitments are prominent determinants of strategy. Regional chemical and polymer value chains have accelerated adoption of biobased feedstocks for specialty applications, and regulatory frameworks emphasize product safety, labeling, and lifecycle assessment. This focus informs investment decisions and encourages cross-border collaborations that target high-purity grades and end-use specifications. Asia-Pacific remains a focal point for capacity expansion and feedstock integration, with a large industrial base supporting both commodity and specialty applications. Rapid industrialization, growing domestic demand for food-grade and industrial-grade lactic acid, and competitive feedstock sourcing in parts of the region continue to influence global trade patterns and supplier competitiveness.
Competitive overview emphasizing quality consistency, sustainability credentials, and strategic partnerships as the primary drivers of differentiation among lactic acid producers
Competitive dynamics concentrate around consistent quality, operational reliability, and the ability to demonstrate environmental and regulatory compliance. Leading producers that combine scalable fermentation capabilities with downstream processing expertise are positioned to serve diverse end uses, from food-grade formulations to industrial polymers. Companies that invest in feedstock diversification and decarbonization pathways strengthen their commercial proposition by offering buyers lower-carbon alternatives and improved supply assurance. Strategic partnerships between chemical firms, polymer manufacturers, and brand owners are increasingly common, reflecting a shift toward integrated value-chain collaboration rather than transactional procurement.
Smaller, specialized producers maintain relevance by focusing on niche grades, bespoke formulations, or regional customer service advantages. These firms often excel in traceability and in meeting stringent certification requirements for specific applications. Across the competitive set, investment in process innovation, quality management systems, and customer-centric supply agreements remains a key differentiator. Stakeholders contemplating expansion or repositioning should weigh the benefits of scale against the agility that smaller players provide in addressing specialized end-use demands and regulatory intricacies.
A set of pragmatic recommendations focused on sustainability integration, supply chain resilience, product differentiation, and strategic partnerships to drive competitive advantage
Industry leaders can pursue several actionable strategies to strengthen market position, reduce risk, and capture value as demand for lactic acid diversifies. First, aligning production strategy with evolving sustainability criteria will unlock commercial opportunities; this includes investing in lower-carbon feedstocks, improving energy efficiency of fermentation and downstream operations, and obtaining recognized environmental certifications. Second, supply chain resilience should be bolstered through supplier diversification, nearshoring selective steps of production, and negotiating flexible contractual arrangements that share risk between buyers and sellers. These measures will mitigate the impacts of trade policy volatility and logistics disruptions.
Third, investing in product and process differentiation-such as enhanced purity grades, tailored stereochemical profiles, and modular delivery formats-will meet the nuanced needs of food, pharmaceutical, and specialty polymer customers. Fourth, cultivating strategic partnerships with downstream users and technology providers can accelerate integration into value-added products and create long-term offtake relationships. Finally, companies should maintain active regulatory and policy monitoring and engage with standards bodies to shape evolving requirements; proactive engagement will reduce compliance surprises and enable timely product positioning. Implementing these steps in a coordinated manner will enhance competitiveness and support sustainable growth.
A clear explanation of the multi-method research approach combining primary interviews, literature review, and comparative analysis to ensure robust strategic insights without numerical estimations
This research synthesis draws on a structured methodology that integrates primary qualitative interviews, secondary literature review, and comparative analysis of production and regulatory frameworks. Primary engagement included discussions with industry practitioners across production, formulation, and procurement roles to surface operational challenges, purchasing priorities, and adoption barriers for different lactic acid grades and forms. Secondary sources comprised technical literature, regulatory documentation, and publicly available corporate disclosures, which were used to validate technological trends, capacity developments, and policy changes that influence sourcing decisions.
Analytical steps included segmentation mapping to align product specifications with end-use requirements, scenario analysis to explore supply chain responses to tariff and trade disruptions, and cross-regional comparison to surface divergent regulatory and commercial drivers. Wherever possible, findings were triangulated across multiple inputs to ensure robustness and to minimize reliance on any single data source. Limitations of the study were acknowledged where proprietary or time-sensitive data were unavailable, and as a result, the synthesis emphasizes directional insights and strategic implications over precise numerical estimations.
A concise concluding synthesis that ties technological progress, regulatory momentum, and segmentation dynamics into a strategic roadmap for lactic acid stakeholders
In conclusion, lactic acid is positioned at the intersection of sustainability-driven demand, technological maturation in bioprocessing, and evolving regulatory expectations. The interplay of these forces has elevated the importance of production route, product specification, and supply chain design for all participants across the value chain. Firms that proactively adapt-by investing in low-carbon feedstocks, diversifying supply options, and engaging in strategic partnerships-will be best placed to meet the differentiated needs of food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and industrial customers.
Policy developments and trade actions have underscored the necessity of operational flexibility and contractual foresight. At the same time, stereochemical and form-based segmentation continues to create technical and commercial distinctions that influence product selection and formulation. Organizations that combine technical excellence with transparent sustainability credentials and responsive customer engagement will gain a durable advantage as demand patterns evolve. The insights provided here aim to inform strategic choices that align operational capabilities with long-term commercial and regulatory shifts.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative introduction that situates lactic acid as a platform molecule bridging sustainable production advances, regulatory complexity, and diverse industrial applications
Lactic acid occupies a pivotal role in contemporary chemical and biochemical value chains, serving as a versatile intermediate and an end-use ingredient across food, personal care, pharmaceuticals, and industrial applications. The substance is produced through biological fermentation and chemical synthesis, and recent advances in fermentation technologies, feedstock diversification, and catalyst development have reshaped production economics and quality parameters. Beyond raw production, the downstream processing of lactic acid into derivatives such as polylactic acid and lactylates has expanded its relevance to sustainable materials and formulatory disciplines.
Within supply chains, logistics, purity specifications, and consistent quality are primary determinants of commercial utility. Producers and formulators increasingly prioritize traceability of feedstocks and the environmental profile of production routes. Regulatory considerations continue to evolve, particularly where lactic acid interfaces with food safety, cosmetic regulation, and pharmaceutical excipient standards. As stakeholders respond to these dynamics, strategic priorities include securing feedstock flexibility, optimizing fermentation yield, and ensuring compliance across geographies. This introduction frames lactic acid as both a commodity chemical and a platform molecule whose trajectory is shaped by technological innovation, regulatory shifts, and the evolving priorities of downstream industries.
A concise analysis of the sectoral transformation revealing technological, regulatory, and supply chain shifts that are redefining lactic acid production and application dynamics
The lactic acid landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology, sustainability expectations, and changing end-use demand. Fermentation platforms have moved from first-generation carbohydrate feedstocks to second-generation and waste-derived substrates, enabling producers to reduce reliance on conventional sugars while improving carbon intensity. Simultaneously, improvements in strain engineering, process intensification, and in situ downstream separation have lowered operating costs and increased product consistency. These technical advances have accelerated the viability of biobased lactic acid as a feedstock for biodegradable polymers, which in turn has stimulated investment in integrated production and polymerization facilities.
Parallel to technological change, regulatory and procurement frameworks are elevating lifecycle considerations. Corporate buyers and institutional procurement teams are increasingly requiring supply chain transparency and robust environmental metrics, prompting producers to demonstrate emissions performance and responsible sourcing. In product markets, formulators are favoring multifunctional ingredients, placing a premium on lactic acid grades that combine purity with functional benefits. As a result, strategic alliances between chemical firms, polymer producers, and brand owners have become more common, aligning investment and commercial strategies around supply security and product sustainability. Looking ahead, these shifts will reinforce differentiation between producers that can deliver validated sustainability credentials and those tied to legacy production models.
An incisive look at how the 2025 United States tariff measures reshaped sourcing, supply chain resilience, and investment decisions across lactic acid value chains
United States tariff actions in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for global lactic acid flows and sourcing strategies. Tariff adjustments raised input costs for certain import pathways, prompting downstream buyers to reassess supplier portfolios and sourcing geographies. In response, some manufacturers explored closer regional sourcing or reshoring of specific process steps to mitigate tariff exposure and reduce transit risk. These operational responses were also accompanied by contractual renegotiations as buyers and suppliers sought to share or reallocate cost impacts through price, payment terms, and longer-term offtake agreements.
Beyond immediate cost transmission, the tariff environment influenced investment timing and capital allocation. Firms evaluating new capacity factored in policy volatility, accelerating investments in domestic production where incentives and predictable policy frameworks supported longer-term returns. Meanwhile, exporters and foreign producers adapted by redirecting volumes to alternative markets with more stable access or by pursuing value-added partnerships that minimized the tariffable content of shipments. Overall, the 2025 tariff environment highlighted the strategic importance of flexible supply chains, diversified supplier bases, and the use of contractual and operational hedges to preserve continuity of supply and control landed costs.
Segment-driven insights that explain how source, physical state, grade, and stereochemical form determine lactic acid’s functional use cases and commercial positioning
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated demand drivers and technical requirements across source, state, grade, and form categories. Production sourced from natural routes-fermentation-is increasingly contrasted with synthetic routes, with buyers choosing based on purity, cost, and sustainability preferences. Liquid and powder states address distinct logistical and formulatory needs; liquid grades favor immediate incorporation in wet processing lines, while powder forms support dry blending and extended shelf life. Grade differentiation between food and industrial uses guides compliance and documentation requirements, with food-grade materials requiring stricter traceability and certification compared with many industrial-grade applications.
Form-level segmentation-D-lactic acid, DL-lactic acid, and L-lactic acid-introduces further nuance through stereochemistry and application-specific behavior. D-lactic acid finds applications across food and beverages, industrial processes, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics and personal care where its stereochemical attributes are desired. DL-lactic acid serves diverse formulations spanning cosmetics and personal care, food and beverages, industrial uses, and pharmaceutical roles, offering a racemic option for formulators. L-lactic acid similarly supports cosmetics and personal care, food and beverages, industrial, and pharmaceutical applications, and its stereochemical purity is often critical for polymerization and certain bioactive applications. This segmentation underscores the necessity for producers and buyers to align product specification, certification, and supply flexibility with end-use performance expectations.
Regional perspective that contrasts production, regulatory pressures, and demand drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific to reveal strategic implications
Regional dynamics shape production footprints, trade flows, and regulatory expectations across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, a combination of feedstock availability, established fermentation expertise, and evolving sustainability commitments has supported both legacy producers and emergent bioprocessors. Procurement teams in the region frequently prioritize logistical reliability and localized production to shorten lead times and lower supply chain complexity. Transitioning to more sustainable feedstocks has become a priority among corporate buyers, which in turn pressures suppliers to demonstrate demonstrable improvements in environmental metrics.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency and circularity commitments are prominent determinants of strategy. Regional chemical and polymer value chains have accelerated adoption of biobased feedstocks for specialty applications, and regulatory frameworks emphasize product safety, labeling, and lifecycle assessment. This focus informs investment decisions and encourages cross-border collaborations that target high-purity grades and end-use specifications. Asia-Pacific remains a focal point for capacity expansion and feedstock integration, with a large industrial base supporting both commodity and specialty applications. Rapid industrialization, growing domestic demand for food-grade and industrial-grade lactic acid, and competitive feedstock sourcing in parts of the region continue to influence global trade patterns and supplier competitiveness.
Competitive overview emphasizing quality consistency, sustainability credentials, and strategic partnerships as the primary drivers of differentiation among lactic acid producers
Competitive dynamics concentrate around consistent quality, operational reliability, and the ability to demonstrate environmental and regulatory compliance. Leading producers that combine scalable fermentation capabilities with downstream processing expertise are positioned to serve diverse end uses, from food-grade formulations to industrial polymers. Companies that invest in feedstock diversification and decarbonization pathways strengthen their commercial proposition by offering buyers lower-carbon alternatives and improved supply assurance. Strategic partnerships between chemical firms, polymer manufacturers, and brand owners are increasingly common, reflecting a shift toward integrated value-chain collaboration rather than transactional procurement.
Smaller, specialized producers maintain relevance by focusing on niche grades, bespoke formulations, or regional customer service advantages. These firms often excel in traceability and in meeting stringent certification requirements for specific applications. Across the competitive set, investment in process innovation, quality management systems, and customer-centric supply agreements remains a key differentiator. Stakeholders contemplating expansion or repositioning should weigh the benefits of scale against the agility that smaller players provide in addressing specialized end-use demands and regulatory intricacies.
A set of pragmatic recommendations focused on sustainability integration, supply chain resilience, product differentiation, and strategic partnerships to drive competitive advantage
Industry leaders can pursue several actionable strategies to strengthen market position, reduce risk, and capture value as demand for lactic acid diversifies. First, aligning production strategy with evolving sustainability criteria will unlock commercial opportunities; this includes investing in lower-carbon feedstocks, improving energy efficiency of fermentation and downstream operations, and obtaining recognized environmental certifications. Second, supply chain resilience should be bolstered through supplier diversification, nearshoring selective steps of production, and negotiating flexible contractual arrangements that share risk between buyers and sellers. These measures will mitigate the impacts of trade policy volatility and logistics disruptions.
Third, investing in product and process differentiation-such as enhanced purity grades, tailored stereochemical profiles, and modular delivery formats-will meet the nuanced needs of food, pharmaceutical, and specialty polymer customers. Fourth, cultivating strategic partnerships with downstream users and technology providers can accelerate integration into value-added products and create long-term offtake relationships. Finally, companies should maintain active regulatory and policy monitoring and engage with standards bodies to shape evolving requirements; proactive engagement will reduce compliance surprises and enable timely product positioning. Implementing these steps in a coordinated manner will enhance competitiveness and support sustainable growth.
A clear explanation of the multi-method research approach combining primary interviews, literature review, and comparative analysis to ensure robust strategic insights without numerical estimations
This research synthesis draws on a structured methodology that integrates primary qualitative interviews, secondary literature review, and comparative analysis of production and regulatory frameworks. Primary engagement included discussions with industry practitioners across production, formulation, and procurement roles to surface operational challenges, purchasing priorities, and adoption barriers for different lactic acid grades and forms. Secondary sources comprised technical literature, regulatory documentation, and publicly available corporate disclosures, which were used to validate technological trends, capacity developments, and policy changes that influence sourcing decisions.
Analytical steps included segmentation mapping to align product specifications with end-use requirements, scenario analysis to explore supply chain responses to tariff and trade disruptions, and cross-regional comparison to surface divergent regulatory and commercial drivers. Wherever possible, findings were triangulated across multiple inputs to ensure robustness and to minimize reliance on any single data source. Limitations of the study were acknowledged where proprietary or time-sensitive data were unavailable, and as a result, the synthesis emphasizes directional insights and strategic implications over precise numerical estimations.
A concise concluding synthesis that ties technological progress, regulatory momentum, and segmentation dynamics into a strategic roadmap for lactic acid stakeholders
In conclusion, lactic acid is positioned at the intersection of sustainability-driven demand, technological maturation in bioprocessing, and evolving regulatory expectations. The interplay of these forces has elevated the importance of production route, product specification, and supply chain design for all participants across the value chain. Firms that proactively adapt-by investing in low-carbon feedstocks, diversifying supply options, and engaging in strategic partnerships-will be best placed to meet the differentiated needs of food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and industrial customers.
Policy developments and trade actions have underscored the necessity of operational flexibility and contractual foresight. At the same time, stereochemical and form-based segmentation continues to create technical and commercial distinctions that influence product selection and formulation. Organizations that combine technical excellence with transparent sustainability credentials and responsive customer engagement will gain a durable advantage as demand patterns evolve. The insights provided here aim to inform strategic choices that align operational capabilities with long-term commercial and regulatory shifts.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
194 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of lactic acid-based polylactic acid (PLA) in sustainable packaging applications to reduce plastic waste
- 5.2. Expansion of pharmaceutical grade lactic acid production to meet growing probiotic and nutraceutical demands
- 5.3. Technological advancements in fermentation processes to enhance lactic acid yield and purity for green chemical synthesis
- 5.4. Strategic partnerships between lactic acid producers and agricultural waste suppliers for cost-efficient biomass feedstocks
- 5.5. Regulatory shifts favoring bio-based lactic acid over petrochemical alternatives for sustainable industrial applications
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Lactic Acid Market, by Source
- 8.1. Natural
- 8.2. Synthetic
- 9. Lactic Acid Market, by State
- 9.1. Liquid
- 9.2. Powder
- 10. Lactic Acid Market, by Grade
- 10.1. Food
- 10.2. Industrial
- 11. Lactic Acid Market, by Form
- 11.1. D-Lactic Acid
- 11.1.1. D-Lactic Acid- Food & Beverages
- 11.1.2. D-Lactic Acid- Industrial
- 11.1.3. D-Lactic Acid- Pharmaceuticals
- 11.1.4. D-Lactic Acid-Cosmetics & Personal Care
- 11.2. DL-Lactic Acid
- 11.2.1. DL-Lactic Acid - Cosmetics & Personal Care
- 11.2.2. DL-Lactic Acid - Food & Beverages
- 11.2.3. DL-Lactic Acid - Industrial
- 11.2.4. DL-Lactic Acid- Pharmaceuticals
- 11.3. L-Lactic Acid
- 11.3.1. L-Lactic Acid - Cosmetics & Personal Care
- 11.3.2. L-Lactic Acid - Food & Beverages
- 11.3.3. L-Lactic Acid - Industrial
- 11.3.4. L-Lactic Acid - Pharmaceuticals
- 12. Lactic Acid Market, by Application
- 12.1. Industrial
- 12.2. Food & Beverages
- 12.3. Pharmaceuticals
- 12.4. Personal Care
- 13. Lactic Acid Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Lactic Acid Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Lactic Acid Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Avantor, Inc.
- 16.3.2. BASF SE
- 16.3.3. BOC Sciences
- 16.3.4. Cargill, Incorporated
- 16.3.5. Cellulac
- 16.3.6. Chr. Hansen A/S by Novonesis Group
- 16.3.7. Corbion N.V.
- 16.3.8. DUBI CHEM MARINE INTERNATIONAL
- 16.3.9. Ensince Industry Co., Ltd
- 16.3.10. Foodchem International Corporation
- 16.3.11. Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
- 16.3.12. Galactic SA
- 16.3.13. Hawkins, Inc.
- 16.3.14. Henan Jindan Lactic Acid Technology Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.15. Hydrite Chemical Co.
- 16.3.16. Jiaan biotech Pvt.Ltd
- 16.3.17. Jungbunzlauer Suisse AG
- 16.3.18. Junsei Chemical Co.,Ltd.
- 16.3.19. Kishida Chemical Co. Ltd.
- 16.3.20. Koninklijke DSM N.V.
- 16.3.21. LG Chem Ltd.
- 16.3.22. Medix Biochemica USA ,Inc.
- 16.3.23. Merck KGaA
- 16.3.24. Mitushi Biopharma
- 16.3.25. Musashino Chemical Laboratory, Ltd.
- 16.3.26. Nacalai Tesque Inc.
- 16.3.27. Teijin Limited
- 16.3.28. The Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
- 16.3.29. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- 16.3.30. Vertec BioSolvents Inc.
- 16.3.31. Vigon International, LLC by Azelis groupADM
- 16.3.32. Vishnupriya Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
