Laboratory Informatics Market by Product Type (Chromatography Data Systems, Electronic Lab Notebooks, Laboratory Execution Systems), End User (Academic & Research, Diagnostics, Environmental Testing), Application, Deployment Mode - Global Forecast 2025-20
Description
The Laboratory Informatics Market was valued at USD 3.71 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.15 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 11.99%, reaching USD 9.20 billion by 2032.
An authoritative orientation to the evolving demands and integration priorities shaping modern laboratory informatics adoption across enterprises and research institutions
The laboratory informatics landscape is undergoing a decisive maturation as organizations confront the dual imperatives of rigorous data integrity and rapid operational agility. Laboratories across sectors are moving beyond point solutions toward integrated stacks that unify data capture, management, and quality controls. This evolution is driven by the need to shorten experimental cycles, improve reproducibility, and enable better oversight across distributed lab networks. As a result, decision-makers are prioritizing platforms that offer strong governance, traceability, and an auditable chain of custody for both samples and digital records.
Consequently, technology selection is increasingly guided by interoperability and standards compliance rather than feature checklists alone. Integration between chromatography data systems, electronic lab notebooks, laboratory execution systems, laboratory information management systems-both commercial and open source-and quality management systems is central to realizing end-to-end process continuity. Furthermore, deployment choices between cloud, hybrid, and on premise architectures now factor heavily into operational resilience, security postures, and long-term total cost considerations. This introduction sets the stage for an executive-level synthesis that highlights structural shifts, regulatory pressures, supply chain dynamics, segmentation nuances, regional differentials, and practical recommendations for leaders navigating the next phase of laboratory informatics adoption.
A comprehensive synthesis of accelerating cloud adoption, embedded analytics, regulatory convergence, and supply chain resilience that is redefining laboratory informatics architectures
Laboratory informatics is experiencing transformative shifts driven by several converging forces that reshape how organizations design, procure, and operate digital laboratory environments. First, the adoption of cloud-native architectures and hybrid deployment models is accelerating, enabling scalable compute resources, more rapid feature delivery, and centralized governance across distributed sites. At the same time, advances in embedded analytics, machine learning, and automation within instrument ecosystems are elevating expectations for real-time insights and closed-loop workflows. Consequently, laboratories are shifting from reactive reporting to prescriptive, data-driven operations that enhance throughput and reduce error rates.
Regulatory and standards developments are another critical vector of change. Heightened scrutiny around data integrity, electronic records, audit trails, and validation requirements is prompting vendors to embed compliance capabilities natively into their platforms. Interoperability is no longer optional: laboratories demand seamless data exchange between chromatography data systems, electronic lab notebooks, laboratory execution systems, laboratory information management systems, and quality management systems to maintain continuity and ensure regulatory readiness. Finally, supply chain resilience and component sourcing considerations are encouraging a reevaluation of vendor relationships, with organizations seeking partners who can deliver secure, transparent, and sustainable roadmaps. These shifts collectively force a strategic rebalancing toward modular, API-first solutions that can scale with scientific complexity and regulatory certainty.
An analytical overview of how recent tariff and trade policy shifts are reshaping procurement strategies, deployment choices, and vendor-customer commercial arrangements in laboratory informatics
Recent tariff adjustments and trade policy shifts have added a new layer of operational complexity for laboratory informatics providers and their customers. Tariff-driven increases in the cost of hardware components, such as servers, specialized storage, and instrument interfaces, have incentivized some organizations to reconsider procurement timing and supplier diversification strategies. In response, vendors and laboratories are increasing focus on software-driven optimizations that decouple value from hardware dependencies, favoring architectures that can be deployed across public and private cloud environments to mitigate regional cost fluctuations.
Moreover, the cumulative impact of trade policy changes has encouraged a regionalization of certain supply chains and a reassessment of support models. Organizations are placing greater emphasis on local service capabilities, validated regional instances, and robust disaster recovery arrangements to avoid single points of failure. For laboratories reliant on integrated hardware-software bundles, the tariff environment is prompting negotiations around total contract value, extended service credits, and phased deliveries to smooth budgetary impacts. At the same time, procurement teams are exploring licensing models and subscription approaches that shift capital intensity into operational expenditure profiles, enabling more predictable budgeting despite external tariff volatility. Overall, the regulatory and trade context is accelerating a migration toward modular, cloud-capable systems that preserve functional continuity while offering more resilient commercial terms.
Strategically actionable segmentation insights revealing where product, deployment, end-user, and application priorities intersect to shape adoption pathways and competitive differentiation
Segmentation analysis reveals nuanced adoption patterns that should inform product strategy and go-to-market planning. Product type segmentation highlights a clear demand for integrated stacks that combine chromatography data systems, electronic lab notebooks, laboratory execution systems, laboratory information management systems-available in both commercial and open source flavors-and quality management systems, because organizations need cohesive data flows and centralized governance across workflows. This drives vendor differentiation toward interoperability, validation toolkits, and out-of-the-box regulatory templates.
When considering deployment mode segmentation, customer preferences vary by organizational scale and risk posture: cloud deployments, including private and public cloud options, appeal to teams seeking scalability and centralized updates; hybrid models offer a compromise for distributed operations requiring local control; and on premise deployments, whether multi-tenant or single-tenant architectures, remain relevant for environments with strict latency, security, or regulatory constraints. End user segmentation further refines opportunity focus: academic and research institutions emphasize flexibility and cost-effective collaboration, diagnostics labs prioritize throughput and traceable sample workflows, environmental testing organizations value robust chain-of-custody features, food and beverage operations require compliance and inventory management, and pharma and biotech users demand validated processes and integration with enterprise systems. Application segmentation underscores where value is realized: compliance management, data analysis, document management, inventory management, sample management, and workflow automation represent distinct engagement points where vendors can align capabilities to user pain points. Taken together, these segmentation lenses reveal pragmatic pathways for tailoring product roadmaps, implementation services, and pricing strategies to distinct buyer personas.
A cross-regional examination of deployment preferences, regulatory pressures, and service model requirements that determine laboratory informatics success across global markets
Regional dynamics continue to influence technology choices, regulatory priorities, and implementation approaches across global laboratories. In the Americas, demand is driven by a blend of commercial research, clinical diagnostics, and industrial testing with an emphasis on rapid deployment, scalability, and alignment with domestic regulatory frameworks. This region tends to embrace cloud-first strategies for new initiatives while maintaining strong requirements for data residency and auditability in regulated workflows. Conversely, in Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization efforts coexist with localized compliance nuances, prompting hybrid deployments and strong attention to data governance, validation documentation, and multilingual support. Procurement decisions in this region often factor in regional certification and service footprint when evaluating vendors.
Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific exhibits a wide spectrum of maturity, where rapid laboratory expansion and investment in biotech and pharmaceutical R&D are balanced by diverse regulatory regimes and varying IT infrastructure readiness. Organizations in this zone frequently prioritize scalable cloud services to accelerate adoption, supported by regional data centers and local integration partners. Across all regions, inter-regional collaborations and multinational lab networks increase the premium on interoperability standards, federated identity management, and cross-border validation strategies. This regional tapestry implies that vendors and implementers must offer flexible deployment options, localized compliance toolsets, and service delivery models adapted to each market’s operational realities.
A nuanced competitive analysis highlighting how platform breadth, specialist depth, open source adoption, and integrator ecosystems influence procurement and implementation outcomes
Competitive dynamics in laboratory informatics reflect a mix of established platform providers, specialized niche vendors, open source communities, and systems integrators that together shape customer choices. Leading vendors increasingly differentiate through comprehensive suites that knit together data capture, sample management, and quality oversight, while specialist companies focus on depth in domains such as chromatography data handling, laboratory execution sequencing, or advanced analytics. Open source options continue to gain traction among academic and research users, offering extensibility and community-driven innovation, though enterprise buyers often choose commercial variants for validated support and compliance tooling.
Systems integrators and managed service providers play a critical role in translating product capability into operational outcomes, particularly for organizations executing multi-site rollouts or complex instrument integrations. Strategic partnerships between platform vendors and cloud hyperscalers broaden deployment flexibility, and alliances with instrument manufacturers facilitate tighter interoperability. As purchasers weigh options, factors such as vendor roadmaps, transparency around validation and regulatory support, professional services capabilities, and customer success frameworks emerge as decisive. The competitive environment therefore rewards vendors who can demonstrate not only feature parity but also predictable implementation outcomes and an ability to support customers through evolving regulatory landscapes.
Practical strategic recommendations for vendors and laboratory leaders to accelerate integration, compliance readiness, and resilient deployment in dynamic regulatory environments
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic yet forward-looking posture to capitalize on technological and regulatory momentum. First, prioritize modular architectures and API-first design principles to enable incremental integration with existing instrumentation and enterprise systems without disruptive rip-and-replace projects. Secondly, accelerate validation-ready practices by embedding audit trails, electronic signatures, and configurable compliance templates into product offerings and deployment playbooks to reduce time-to-compliance for customers. Third, offer flexible commercial models that accommodate capital budget constraints and tariff-driven volatility by providing subscription, consumption-based, and phased licensing options that align incentives.
Moreover, invest in regional service delivery capabilities and localized compliance expertise to improve customer confidence and reduce implementation friction. Strengthen partnerships with instrument manufacturers and cloud providers to assure end-to-end interoperability and to expand deployment options across public, private, and hybrid clouds. Finally, cultivate a customer success function that moves beyond onboarding to long-term optimization, using telemetry and usage analytics to proactively identify adoption barriers and to propose value-enhancing features or services. These steps, taken together, will help vendors and users convert technical capability into measurable operational resilience and scientific throughput.
A mixed-methods research approach combining practitioner interviews, platform capability evaluation, and regulatory document analysis to ground insights in operational reality
This research synthesis relies on a blended methodological approach that integrates qualitative expert interviews, technology capability assessments, and secondary literature review to create a balanced perspective on laboratory informatics trends. Expert interviews with laboratory managers, technology leaders, and implementation specialists provided first-hand insights into operational pain points, deployment constraints, and vendor selection criteria, while technology capability assessments evaluated platform features, interoperability patterns, and compliance toolsets to identify common strengths and gaps.
Secondary source analysis included regulatory guidance, standards documentation, and publicly available vendor technical materials to triangulate claims about functionality and roadmaps. The analysis also incorporated case studies of cross-site implementations and instrument integrations to surface practical considerations around validation, data migration, and change management. Throughout the methodology, care was taken to prioritize primary stakeholder perspectives and to validate emerging themes against multiple independent sources. This mixed-methods approach ensures that the conclusions and recommendations presented are grounded in operational realities and informed by both practitioner experience and documented product behavior.
A concise synthesis of imperative priorities for laboratories and vendors centered on interoperability, validation readiness, and adaptable deployment strategies to drive sustained adoption
In summary, laboratory informatics is entering a phase characterized by consolidation of data flows, stronger regulatory expectations, and a strategic shift toward modular, cloud-capable architectures. As laboratories confront growing complexity-whether from instrument heterogeneity, distributed operations, or evolving compliance demands-successful organizations will place interoperability, validation readiness, and flexible commercial constructs at the center of their procurement and implementation strategies. Vendors that deliver robust integration frameworks, clear compliance toolsets, and adaptive deployment models stand to gain long-term adoption and deeper customer relationships.
Looking forward, the balance between centralized governance and local operational autonomy will continue to shape architecture decisions, while regional regulatory nuance and supply chain dynamics will influence procurement and service delivery models. By applying the segmentation lenses and regional perspectives outlined earlier, leaders can make choices that reduce implementation risk and accelerate the realization of scientific and operational objectives. This conclusion offers a compact synthesis of the key imperatives that will guide successful laboratory informatics programs going forward.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative orientation to the evolving demands and integration priorities shaping modern laboratory informatics adoption across enterprises and research institutions
The laboratory informatics landscape is undergoing a decisive maturation as organizations confront the dual imperatives of rigorous data integrity and rapid operational agility. Laboratories across sectors are moving beyond point solutions toward integrated stacks that unify data capture, management, and quality controls. This evolution is driven by the need to shorten experimental cycles, improve reproducibility, and enable better oversight across distributed lab networks. As a result, decision-makers are prioritizing platforms that offer strong governance, traceability, and an auditable chain of custody for both samples and digital records.
Consequently, technology selection is increasingly guided by interoperability and standards compliance rather than feature checklists alone. Integration between chromatography data systems, electronic lab notebooks, laboratory execution systems, laboratory information management systems-both commercial and open source-and quality management systems is central to realizing end-to-end process continuity. Furthermore, deployment choices between cloud, hybrid, and on premise architectures now factor heavily into operational resilience, security postures, and long-term total cost considerations. This introduction sets the stage for an executive-level synthesis that highlights structural shifts, regulatory pressures, supply chain dynamics, segmentation nuances, regional differentials, and practical recommendations for leaders navigating the next phase of laboratory informatics adoption.
A comprehensive synthesis of accelerating cloud adoption, embedded analytics, regulatory convergence, and supply chain resilience that is redefining laboratory informatics architectures
Laboratory informatics is experiencing transformative shifts driven by several converging forces that reshape how organizations design, procure, and operate digital laboratory environments. First, the adoption of cloud-native architectures and hybrid deployment models is accelerating, enabling scalable compute resources, more rapid feature delivery, and centralized governance across distributed sites. At the same time, advances in embedded analytics, machine learning, and automation within instrument ecosystems are elevating expectations for real-time insights and closed-loop workflows. Consequently, laboratories are shifting from reactive reporting to prescriptive, data-driven operations that enhance throughput and reduce error rates.
Regulatory and standards developments are another critical vector of change. Heightened scrutiny around data integrity, electronic records, audit trails, and validation requirements is prompting vendors to embed compliance capabilities natively into their platforms. Interoperability is no longer optional: laboratories demand seamless data exchange between chromatography data systems, electronic lab notebooks, laboratory execution systems, laboratory information management systems, and quality management systems to maintain continuity and ensure regulatory readiness. Finally, supply chain resilience and component sourcing considerations are encouraging a reevaluation of vendor relationships, with organizations seeking partners who can deliver secure, transparent, and sustainable roadmaps. These shifts collectively force a strategic rebalancing toward modular, API-first solutions that can scale with scientific complexity and regulatory certainty.
An analytical overview of how recent tariff and trade policy shifts are reshaping procurement strategies, deployment choices, and vendor-customer commercial arrangements in laboratory informatics
Recent tariff adjustments and trade policy shifts have added a new layer of operational complexity for laboratory informatics providers and their customers. Tariff-driven increases in the cost of hardware components, such as servers, specialized storage, and instrument interfaces, have incentivized some organizations to reconsider procurement timing and supplier diversification strategies. In response, vendors and laboratories are increasing focus on software-driven optimizations that decouple value from hardware dependencies, favoring architectures that can be deployed across public and private cloud environments to mitigate regional cost fluctuations.
Moreover, the cumulative impact of trade policy changes has encouraged a regionalization of certain supply chains and a reassessment of support models. Organizations are placing greater emphasis on local service capabilities, validated regional instances, and robust disaster recovery arrangements to avoid single points of failure. For laboratories reliant on integrated hardware-software bundles, the tariff environment is prompting negotiations around total contract value, extended service credits, and phased deliveries to smooth budgetary impacts. At the same time, procurement teams are exploring licensing models and subscription approaches that shift capital intensity into operational expenditure profiles, enabling more predictable budgeting despite external tariff volatility. Overall, the regulatory and trade context is accelerating a migration toward modular, cloud-capable systems that preserve functional continuity while offering more resilient commercial terms.
Strategically actionable segmentation insights revealing where product, deployment, end-user, and application priorities intersect to shape adoption pathways and competitive differentiation
Segmentation analysis reveals nuanced adoption patterns that should inform product strategy and go-to-market planning. Product type segmentation highlights a clear demand for integrated stacks that combine chromatography data systems, electronic lab notebooks, laboratory execution systems, laboratory information management systems-available in both commercial and open source flavors-and quality management systems, because organizations need cohesive data flows and centralized governance across workflows. This drives vendor differentiation toward interoperability, validation toolkits, and out-of-the-box regulatory templates.
When considering deployment mode segmentation, customer preferences vary by organizational scale and risk posture: cloud deployments, including private and public cloud options, appeal to teams seeking scalability and centralized updates; hybrid models offer a compromise for distributed operations requiring local control; and on premise deployments, whether multi-tenant or single-tenant architectures, remain relevant for environments with strict latency, security, or regulatory constraints. End user segmentation further refines opportunity focus: academic and research institutions emphasize flexibility and cost-effective collaboration, diagnostics labs prioritize throughput and traceable sample workflows, environmental testing organizations value robust chain-of-custody features, food and beverage operations require compliance and inventory management, and pharma and biotech users demand validated processes and integration with enterprise systems. Application segmentation underscores where value is realized: compliance management, data analysis, document management, inventory management, sample management, and workflow automation represent distinct engagement points where vendors can align capabilities to user pain points. Taken together, these segmentation lenses reveal pragmatic pathways for tailoring product roadmaps, implementation services, and pricing strategies to distinct buyer personas.
A cross-regional examination of deployment preferences, regulatory pressures, and service model requirements that determine laboratory informatics success across global markets
Regional dynamics continue to influence technology choices, regulatory priorities, and implementation approaches across global laboratories. In the Americas, demand is driven by a blend of commercial research, clinical diagnostics, and industrial testing with an emphasis on rapid deployment, scalability, and alignment with domestic regulatory frameworks. This region tends to embrace cloud-first strategies for new initiatives while maintaining strong requirements for data residency and auditability in regulated workflows. Conversely, in Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization efforts coexist with localized compliance nuances, prompting hybrid deployments and strong attention to data governance, validation documentation, and multilingual support. Procurement decisions in this region often factor in regional certification and service footprint when evaluating vendors.
Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific exhibits a wide spectrum of maturity, where rapid laboratory expansion and investment in biotech and pharmaceutical R&D are balanced by diverse regulatory regimes and varying IT infrastructure readiness. Organizations in this zone frequently prioritize scalable cloud services to accelerate adoption, supported by regional data centers and local integration partners. Across all regions, inter-regional collaborations and multinational lab networks increase the premium on interoperability standards, federated identity management, and cross-border validation strategies. This regional tapestry implies that vendors and implementers must offer flexible deployment options, localized compliance toolsets, and service delivery models adapted to each market’s operational realities.
A nuanced competitive analysis highlighting how platform breadth, specialist depth, open source adoption, and integrator ecosystems influence procurement and implementation outcomes
Competitive dynamics in laboratory informatics reflect a mix of established platform providers, specialized niche vendors, open source communities, and systems integrators that together shape customer choices. Leading vendors increasingly differentiate through comprehensive suites that knit together data capture, sample management, and quality oversight, while specialist companies focus on depth in domains such as chromatography data handling, laboratory execution sequencing, or advanced analytics. Open source options continue to gain traction among academic and research users, offering extensibility and community-driven innovation, though enterprise buyers often choose commercial variants for validated support and compliance tooling.
Systems integrators and managed service providers play a critical role in translating product capability into operational outcomes, particularly for organizations executing multi-site rollouts or complex instrument integrations. Strategic partnerships between platform vendors and cloud hyperscalers broaden deployment flexibility, and alliances with instrument manufacturers facilitate tighter interoperability. As purchasers weigh options, factors such as vendor roadmaps, transparency around validation and regulatory support, professional services capabilities, and customer success frameworks emerge as decisive. The competitive environment therefore rewards vendors who can demonstrate not only feature parity but also predictable implementation outcomes and an ability to support customers through evolving regulatory landscapes.
Practical strategic recommendations for vendors and laboratory leaders to accelerate integration, compliance readiness, and resilient deployment in dynamic regulatory environments
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic yet forward-looking posture to capitalize on technological and regulatory momentum. First, prioritize modular architectures and API-first design principles to enable incremental integration with existing instrumentation and enterprise systems without disruptive rip-and-replace projects. Secondly, accelerate validation-ready practices by embedding audit trails, electronic signatures, and configurable compliance templates into product offerings and deployment playbooks to reduce time-to-compliance for customers. Third, offer flexible commercial models that accommodate capital budget constraints and tariff-driven volatility by providing subscription, consumption-based, and phased licensing options that align incentives.
Moreover, invest in regional service delivery capabilities and localized compliance expertise to improve customer confidence and reduce implementation friction. Strengthen partnerships with instrument manufacturers and cloud providers to assure end-to-end interoperability and to expand deployment options across public, private, and hybrid clouds. Finally, cultivate a customer success function that moves beyond onboarding to long-term optimization, using telemetry and usage analytics to proactively identify adoption barriers and to propose value-enhancing features or services. These steps, taken together, will help vendors and users convert technical capability into measurable operational resilience and scientific throughput.
A mixed-methods research approach combining practitioner interviews, platform capability evaluation, and regulatory document analysis to ground insights in operational reality
This research synthesis relies on a blended methodological approach that integrates qualitative expert interviews, technology capability assessments, and secondary literature review to create a balanced perspective on laboratory informatics trends. Expert interviews with laboratory managers, technology leaders, and implementation specialists provided first-hand insights into operational pain points, deployment constraints, and vendor selection criteria, while technology capability assessments evaluated platform features, interoperability patterns, and compliance toolsets to identify common strengths and gaps.
Secondary source analysis included regulatory guidance, standards documentation, and publicly available vendor technical materials to triangulate claims about functionality and roadmaps. The analysis also incorporated case studies of cross-site implementations and instrument integrations to surface practical considerations around validation, data migration, and change management. Throughout the methodology, care was taken to prioritize primary stakeholder perspectives and to validate emerging themes against multiple independent sources. This mixed-methods approach ensures that the conclusions and recommendations presented are grounded in operational realities and informed by both practitioner experience and documented product behavior.
A concise synthesis of imperative priorities for laboratories and vendors centered on interoperability, validation readiness, and adaptable deployment strategies to drive sustained adoption
In summary, laboratory informatics is entering a phase characterized by consolidation of data flows, stronger regulatory expectations, and a strategic shift toward modular, cloud-capable architectures. As laboratories confront growing complexity-whether from instrument heterogeneity, distributed operations, or evolving compliance demands-successful organizations will place interoperability, validation readiness, and flexible commercial constructs at the center of their procurement and implementation strategies. Vendors that deliver robust integration frameworks, clear compliance toolsets, and adaptive deployment models stand to gain long-term adoption and deeper customer relationships.
Looking forward, the balance between centralized governance and local operational autonomy will continue to shape architecture decisions, while regional regulatory nuance and supply chain dynamics will influence procurement and service delivery models. By applying the segmentation lenses and regional perspectives outlined earlier, leaders can make choices that reduce implementation risk and accelerate the realization of scientific and operational objectives. This conclusion offers a compact synthesis of the key imperatives that will guide successful laboratory informatics programs going forward.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of AI-driven predictive analytics in LIMS for proactive sample quality control
- 5.2. Implementation of blockchain-enabled traceability in clinical laboratory data management
- 5.3. Integration of IoT-enabled remote monitoring sensors in biopharmaceutical lab workflows
- 5.4. Deployment of cloud-native informatics platforms with auto-scaling laboratory data processing
- 5.5. Advancement of digital pathology imaging solutions integrated into informatics ecosystems
- 5.6. Use of natural language processing to automate electronic lab notebook data entry
- 5.7. Enabling regulatory compliance through real-time audit trails and e signature capture in LIMS
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Laboratory Informatics Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Chromatography Data Systems
- 8.2. Electronic Lab Notebooks
- 8.3. Laboratory Execution Systems
- 8.4. Laboratory Information Management Systems
- 8.4.1. Commercial
- 8.4.2. Open Source
- 8.5. Quality Management Systems
- 9. Laboratory Informatics Market, by End User
- 9.1. Academic & Research
- 9.2. Diagnostics
- 9.3. Environmental Testing
- 9.4. Food & Beverage
- 9.5. Pharma & Biotech
- 10. Laboratory Informatics Market, by Application
- 10.1. Compliance Management
- 10.2. Data Analysis
- 10.3. Document Management
- 10.4. Inventory Management
- 10.5. Sample Management
- 10.6. Workflow Automation
- 11. Laboratory Informatics Market, by Deployment Mode
- 11.1. Cloud
- 11.2. On Premise
- 12. Laboratory Informatics Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Laboratory Informatics Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Laboratory Informatics Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
- 15.3.2. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
- 15.3.3. Bruker Corporation
- 15.3.4. Danaher Corporation
- 15.3.5. Dassault Systèmes SE
- 15.3.6. GE Healthcare LLC
- 15.3.7. Infosys Limited
- 15.3.8. Merck KGaA
- 15.3.9. PerkinElmer, Inc.
- 15.3.10. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- 15.3.11. Waters Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
