Isobutene Market by Source (Fcc Byproduct, On-Purpose Production), Production Technology (Catalytic Dehydration, Fluid Catalytic Cracking, Metathesis), Grade, End Use, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Isobutene Market was valued at USD 30.66 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 32.04 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 4.40%, reaching USD 43.29 billion by 2032.
A focused orientation for executives and technical leaders clarifying the most material drivers, risks, and actionable priorities in the contemporary isobutene environment
This executive summary provides a concise, actionable synthesis of the current isobutene landscape, emphasizing drivers, structural shifts, and pragmatic implications for industry stakeholders. The aim is to orient executives, commercial strategists, and technical leaders to the most material forces shaping production, demand, and supply chain resilience. Structured to support rapid decision making, the summary distills complex technical and policy interactions into clear strategic implications while preserving the granular detail that underpins robust commercial choices.
The narrative draws on cross-disciplinary evidence spanning feedstock availability, production technology evolution, downstream polymer and fuel applications, and emerging regulatory overlays. It prioritizes clarity over exhaustive coverage, enabling readers to identify where to probe deeper within the full report. Throughout, the emphasis remains on practical consequences: how changes in sourcing, tariff regimes, or production routes translate into procurement risks, margin pressure, and partnership opportunities. Consequently, readers can use this summary to align short-term tactical moves with medium-term capability investments, ensuring that operational choices reflect the evolving market context.
A convergence of feedstock flexibility, production technology advances, regulatory pressures, and downstream product demands is rapidly reshaping competitive advantage across the isobutene value chain
The isobutene landscape is undergoing a sequence of transformative shifts that are redefining competitive advantage and investment priorities. Feedstock flexibility has moved to the forefront as producers reassess the balance between refinery-derived streams and on-purpose routes; this shift has immediate implications for asset utilization and capital allocation. At the same time, advancements in production technology-particularly improvements in catalytic dehydration processes, higher selectivity in metathesis routes, and incremental gains in thermal cracking reactors-are changing cost structures and opening new pathways for smaller-scale, decentralized production.
Regulatory pressure on fuel composition and additive usage is accelerating innovation in derivative chemistries and formulations, prompting downstream manufacturers to diversify supplier bases and qualify alternative grades more rapidly. Strategic partnerships and integrated value-chain arrangements are therefore becoming more common, as companies seek to secure consistent feedstock volumes while sharing technical risk. Parallel to these developments, the plastics and elastomer sectors are pushing for higher-performance polymers with narrower property windows, which is creating demand for polymer-grade and specialty isobutene streams. Taken together, these shifts are compressing decision cycles and elevating the importance of agility in sourcing, process optimization, and collaborative product development.
How the 2025 United States tariff adjustments catalyzed procurement reevaluation, supplier diversification, and supply chain modernization across isobutene-dependent industries
The United States tariff actions implemented in 2025 have had a compounding effect on trade flows, procurement strategies, and the calculus for domestic versus imported supply. Tariff adjustments created immediate incentives for buyers to revisit long-term contracts and examine alternate sourcing corridors, which in turn intensified competition among regional suppliers to capture reallocated demand. Strategic procurement teams responded by accelerating qualification programs for a wider set of suppliers and by increasing the share of on-purpose production within their procurement mix to hedge exposure to international trade volatility.
Moreover, the tariff environment prompted some manufacturers to evaluate backward integration as a hedge against potential future trade disruptions and to protect feedstock security for critical downstream applications. This shift has driven renewed interest in capital projects that emphasize modularity and scalability, allowing plants to ramp production without committing to inflexible, large-scale investments. At the same time, logistics and inventory strategies evolved: firms increased buffer stocks selectively for high-value grades while optimizing distribution networks to reduce landed cost impacts. Overall, the 2025 tariff landscape served as a catalyst for supply chain modernization and for closer alignment between commercial procurement, legal teams, and operations planning.
An intricate segmentation analysis exposing where product purity, production route, and end‑use industry dynamics create differentiated value and operational imperatives in the isobutene chain
A nuanced segmentation lens reveals where value and vulnerability concentrate within the isobutene market, shaping both product strategies and supply chain choices. Examining end use, alkylation applications-split between diesel alkylation and gasoline alkylation-remain critical for fuel blending pathways and regulatory compliance, while specialty elastomers like butyl rubber, which encompasses bromobutyl rubber, chlorobutyl rubber, and standard butyl rubber, drive demand for higher-purity streams and consistent impurity profiles. Meanwhile, methyl tert-butyl ether and polyisobutylene demand reflects differing performance needs, with polyisobutylene itself subdivided into high viscosity, medium viscosity, and low viscosity grades that correspond to lubricant, sealant, and adhesive performance windows.
On the supply side, source segmentation between FCC byproduct and on-purpose production shapes strategic responses. On-purpose production routes include butane dehydrogenation, catalytic dehydration, and olefin metathesis, each carrying distinct feedstock, capex, and operating footprints. Production technology segmentation further differentiates competitive positioning: catalytic dehydration delivers lean impurity profiles desirable for polymer-grade output, fluid catalytic cracking provides scale advantages via refinery integration, metathesis offers route flexibility for feedstock conversion, and thermal cracking remains relevant where simplicity and robustness are prioritized. Grade differentiation among chemical, fuel, and polymer grades influences contract terms, quality assurance protocols, and certification timelines, while end use industry segmentation across automotive, construction, electrical & electronics, and packaging highlights where downstream performance attributes-such as permeability, electrical insulation, or mechanical resilience-drive tighter supplier qualification and co-development activities.
Understanding how these segments interrelate permits a targeted approach to product development, customer engagement, and plant configuration. For example, facilities optimized for polymer-grade output will make different investment choices than refineries prioritizing FCC-derived fuel additives. Similarly, companies serving automotive and electrical applications need to emphasize traceability and consistent rheological properties, whereas suppliers focused on packaging materials may prioritize cost-competitive, high-throughput production. By aligning commercial, technical, and quality functions around these segmentation realities, organizations can better prioritize investments and reduce time-to-market for differentiated isobutene-derived products.
A comparative regional assessment revealing where feedstock advantages, regulatory regimes, and downstream demand patterns should guide capacity placement, sourcing, and partnership strategies
Regional dynamics are central to strategic planning, as supply, demand, and regulatory posture vary markedly across geographies and influence where investments and partnerships will deliver the greatest returns. In the Americas, integration with refining complexes and access to shale-derived feedstocks provide opportunities for cost-competitive, scalable production, while also encouraging investment in on-purpose technologies to capture higher-value polymer and specialty streams. By contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a more heterogeneous picture: stringent environmental regulations and established petrochemical clusters in parts of Europe reward high-quality, low-impurity product streams, whereas certain Middle Eastern producers leverage advantaged energy costs and large-scale facilities to compete on volume and price.
Asia-Pacific stands out for rapid demand growth in automotive, electronics, and packaging applications, combined with a policy environment that encourages domestic capability building and technology transfer. This region’s supply chain is characterized by a mix of large integrated producers and nimble specialty manufacturers that can respond quickly to shifts in polymer specifications. Trade linkages between these regions create both opportunities and vulnerabilities: logistical bottlenecks or policy shifts in one region can ripple through global procurement networks, prompting firms to maintain multi-regional sourcing strategies and to invest in regional qualification capabilities. Consequently, regional insights should inform decisions about where to site incremental capacity, how to structure inventory, and which local partnerships to pursue for faster market access and regulatory compliance.
An analytical view of competitive positioning showing how integration, technological partnerships, and targeted investments determine resilience and advantage across isobutene producers
Competitive dynamics in the isobutene value chain are shaped by a mix of integrated refiners, specialist chemical producers, and technology providers that enable differentiation through scale, process know-how, and route flexibility. Leading producers that combine refinery streams with on-purpose capabilities tend to capture both volume-driven opportunities and specialized, higher-margin segments. At the same time, smaller, focused manufacturers leverage agility to serve niche polymer-grade and elastomer markets, offering tighter quality control and faster product development cycles for customers with exacting specifications.
Across the landscape, companies are deploying a mix of strategies to strengthen resilience and growth. Some have prioritized strategic alliances and joint ventures to secure feedstock and share technical risk, while others have invested in modular plants and targeted retrofits to improve the selectivity and yield of specific production routes. Technology licensing and catalyst partnerships are increasingly important, as incremental improvements in selectivity or energy efficiency can materially enhance competitiveness. In addition, firms that proactively address sustainability through energy optimization, lower-emission processes, and circularity initiatives tend to find easier access to certain customer segments and financing channels. Observing these strategic patterns helps illuminate where potential partners or competitors may direct future capital and which capabilities will be most valuable in the coming planning cycles.
Practical strategic moves for senior leaders to secure feedstock flexibility, enhance production selectivity, and align investments with downstream premium opportunities and sustainability goals
Industry leaders should prioritize a pragmatic set of actions to protect margins, secure feedstock flexibility, and capture downstream premium opportunities. First, diversify procurement by combining refinery-linked streams with qualified on-purpose producers to balance cost efficiency and quality control; this dual-track approach reduces exposure to geopolitical and tariff-related shocks and enables rapid switching between supply sources when needed. Second, accelerate projects that enhance production selectivity-such as catalyst upgrades for catalytic dehydration or retrofits to improve metathesis yields-because even modest improvements in impurity profiles and energy intensity can open access to higher-value polymer and specialty markets.
Third, pursue strategic partnerships across the value chain, including co-development agreements with downstream polymer and elastomer manufacturers, to shorten qualification cycles and co-create application-specific grades. Fourth, re-evaluate inventory and logistics strategies to focus buffer stocks on critical, high-margin grades while improving just-in-time capabilities for more commoditized streams. Fifth, embed sustainability metrics into capital allocation and supplier selection, prioritizing projects that reduce emissions intensity and enhance circular feedstock use, as these criteria increasingly influence customer procurement and financing terms. Finally, invest in scenario planning and flexible asset designs to accommodate regulatory shifts and trade policy fluctuations, ensuring that investment choices remain robust across plausible futures.
A rigorous multi-method research framework blending primary stakeholder interviews, technical modeling, and competitive benchmarking to validate strategic conclusions for decision-makers
The research methodology underpinning this executive summary combines multi-source intelligence, technical validation, and stakeholder consultation to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary inputs include structured interviews with production engineers, procurement leads, and product development managers to capture operational realities, supplier dynamics, and qualification timelines. Secondary inputs incorporate open-source regulatory filings, process engineering literature, and publicly available industry reports to contextualize technological trajectories and historical policy shifts. These sources were triangulated to cross-validate assertions about process performance, feedstock characteristics, and downstream quality requirements.
Analytical techniques included comparative process modeling to assess relative impurity profiles and energy intensity across production routes, supply chain mapping to identify critical nodes and alternative trade corridors, and qualitative competitive benchmarking to understand strategic positioning and partnership activity. Findings were stress-tested through sensitivity analyses and reviewed with subject-matter experts to mitigate bias and surface divergent perspectives. Throughout, data integrity practices-such as traceability of sources, version control for modeling inputs, and transparent assumptions-were applied to ensure that conclusions are defensible and actionable for commercial and technical stakeholders seeking to translate insights into operational plans.
A concise synthesis of strategic imperatives emphasizing agility, selectivity, and targeted capability building to convert market dynamics into competitive advantage
In sum, the isobutene landscape is at an inflection point where feedstock choices, production technology evolution, and policy dynamics converge to reshape commercial priorities. The combination of tariff-driven procurement shifts, technological progress in catalytic and metathesis pathways, and differentiated downstream requirements for polymer and elastomer grades means that agility and technical competence have become primary sources of competitive advantage. Firms that can balance scale with selectivity, secure diversified supply chains, and move quickly on targeted process improvements will be best positioned to capture higher-value opportunities while mitigating margin erosion from trade volatility.
The practical implication is clear: strategic clarity, rapid supplier qualification, and selective investment in process enhancements should be elevated in corporate planning. These steps will allow organizations to protect critical production flows, respond to changing regulatory environments, and collaborate effectively with downstream customers to co-develop grades that meet new performance and sustainability expectations. Stakeholders using the insights in this summary can prioritize near-term tactical moves that align with longer-term capability building, thereby converting market intelligence into concrete competitive gains.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A focused orientation for executives and technical leaders clarifying the most material drivers, risks, and actionable priorities in the contemporary isobutene environment
This executive summary provides a concise, actionable synthesis of the current isobutene landscape, emphasizing drivers, structural shifts, and pragmatic implications for industry stakeholders. The aim is to orient executives, commercial strategists, and technical leaders to the most material forces shaping production, demand, and supply chain resilience. Structured to support rapid decision making, the summary distills complex technical and policy interactions into clear strategic implications while preserving the granular detail that underpins robust commercial choices.
The narrative draws on cross-disciplinary evidence spanning feedstock availability, production technology evolution, downstream polymer and fuel applications, and emerging regulatory overlays. It prioritizes clarity over exhaustive coverage, enabling readers to identify where to probe deeper within the full report. Throughout, the emphasis remains on practical consequences: how changes in sourcing, tariff regimes, or production routes translate into procurement risks, margin pressure, and partnership opportunities. Consequently, readers can use this summary to align short-term tactical moves with medium-term capability investments, ensuring that operational choices reflect the evolving market context.
A convergence of feedstock flexibility, production technology advances, regulatory pressures, and downstream product demands is rapidly reshaping competitive advantage across the isobutene value chain
The isobutene landscape is undergoing a sequence of transformative shifts that are redefining competitive advantage and investment priorities. Feedstock flexibility has moved to the forefront as producers reassess the balance between refinery-derived streams and on-purpose routes; this shift has immediate implications for asset utilization and capital allocation. At the same time, advancements in production technology-particularly improvements in catalytic dehydration processes, higher selectivity in metathesis routes, and incremental gains in thermal cracking reactors-are changing cost structures and opening new pathways for smaller-scale, decentralized production.
Regulatory pressure on fuel composition and additive usage is accelerating innovation in derivative chemistries and formulations, prompting downstream manufacturers to diversify supplier bases and qualify alternative grades more rapidly. Strategic partnerships and integrated value-chain arrangements are therefore becoming more common, as companies seek to secure consistent feedstock volumes while sharing technical risk. Parallel to these developments, the plastics and elastomer sectors are pushing for higher-performance polymers with narrower property windows, which is creating demand for polymer-grade and specialty isobutene streams. Taken together, these shifts are compressing decision cycles and elevating the importance of agility in sourcing, process optimization, and collaborative product development.
How the 2025 United States tariff adjustments catalyzed procurement reevaluation, supplier diversification, and supply chain modernization across isobutene-dependent industries
The United States tariff actions implemented in 2025 have had a compounding effect on trade flows, procurement strategies, and the calculus for domestic versus imported supply. Tariff adjustments created immediate incentives for buyers to revisit long-term contracts and examine alternate sourcing corridors, which in turn intensified competition among regional suppliers to capture reallocated demand. Strategic procurement teams responded by accelerating qualification programs for a wider set of suppliers and by increasing the share of on-purpose production within their procurement mix to hedge exposure to international trade volatility.
Moreover, the tariff environment prompted some manufacturers to evaluate backward integration as a hedge against potential future trade disruptions and to protect feedstock security for critical downstream applications. This shift has driven renewed interest in capital projects that emphasize modularity and scalability, allowing plants to ramp production without committing to inflexible, large-scale investments. At the same time, logistics and inventory strategies evolved: firms increased buffer stocks selectively for high-value grades while optimizing distribution networks to reduce landed cost impacts. Overall, the 2025 tariff landscape served as a catalyst for supply chain modernization and for closer alignment between commercial procurement, legal teams, and operations planning.
An intricate segmentation analysis exposing where product purity, production route, and end‑use industry dynamics create differentiated value and operational imperatives in the isobutene chain
A nuanced segmentation lens reveals where value and vulnerability concentrate within the isobutene market, shaping both product strategies and supply chain choices. Examining end use, alkylation applications-split between diesel alkylation and gasoline alkylation-remain critical for fuel blending pathways and regulatory compliance, while specialty elastomers like butyl rubber, which encompasses bromobutyl rubber, chlorobutyl rubber, and standard butyl rubber, drive demand for higher-purity streams and consistent impurity profiles. Meanwhile, methyl tert-butyl ether and polyisobutylene demand reflects differing performance needs, with polyisobutylene itself subdivided into high viscosity, medium viscosity, and low viscosity grades that correspond to lubricant, sealant, and adhesive performance windows.
On the supply side, source segmentation between FCC byproduct and on-purpose production shapes strategic responses. On-purpose production routes include butane dehydrogenation, catalytic dehydration, and olefin metathesis, each carrying distinct feedstock, capex, and operating footprints. Production technology segmentation further differentiates competitive positioning: catalytic dehydration delivers lean impurity profiles desirable for polymer-grade output, fluid catalytic cracking provides scale advantages via refinery integration, metathesis offers route flexibility for feedstock conversion, and thermal cracking remains relevant where simplicity and robustness are prioritized. Grade differentiation among chemical, fuel, and polymer grades influences contract terms, quality assurance protocols, and certification timelines, while end use industry segmentation across automotive, construction, electrical & electronics, and packaging highlights where downstream performance attributes-such as permeability, electrical insulation, or mechanical resilience-drive tighter supplier qualification and co-development activities.
Understanding how these segments interrelate permits a targeted approach to product development, customer engagement, and plant configuration. For example, facilities optimized for polymer-grade output will make different investment choices than refineries prioritizing FCC-derived fuel additives. Similarly, companies serving automotive and electrical applications need to emphasize traceability and consistent rheological properties, whereas suppliers focused on packaging materials may prioritize cost-competitive, high-throughput production. By aligning commercial, technical, and quality functions around these segmentation realities, organizations can better prioritize investments and reduce time-to-market for differentiated isobutene-derived products.
A comparative regional assessment revealing where feedstock advantages, regulatory regimes, and downstream demand patterns should guide capacity placement, sourcing, and partnership strategies
Regional dynamics are central to strategic planning, as supply, demand, and regulatory posture vary markedly across geographies and influence where investments and partnerships will deliver the greatest returns. In the Americas, integration with refining complexes and access to shale-derived feedstocks provide opportunities for cost-competitive, scalable production, while also encouraging investment in on-purpose technologies to capture higher-value polymer and specialty streams. By contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a more heterogeneous picture: stringent environmental regulations and established petrochemical clusters in parts of Europe reward high-quality, low-impurity product streams, whereas certain Middle Eastern producers leverage advantaged energy costs and large-scale facilities to compete on volume and price.
Asia-Pacific stands out for rapid demand growth in automotive, electronics, and packaging applications, combined with a policy environment that encourages domestic capability building and technology transfer. This region’s supply chain is characterized by a mix of large integrated producers and nimble specialty manufacturers that can respond quickly to shifts in polymer specifications. Trade linkages between these regions create both opportunities and vulnerabilities: logistical bottlenecks or policy shifts in one region can ripple through global procurement networks, prompting firms to maintain multi-regional sourcing strategies and to invest in regional qualification capabilities. Consequently, regional insights should inform decisions about where to site incremental capacity, how to structure inventory, and which local partnerships to pursue for faster market access and regulatory compliance.
An analytical view of competitive positioning showing how integration, technological partnerships, and targeted investments determine resilience and advantage across isobutene producers
Competitive dynamics in the isobutene value chain are shaped by a mix of integrated refiners, specialist chemical producers, and technology providers that enable differentiation through scale, process know-how, and route flexibility. Leading producers that combine refinery streams with on-purpose capabilities tend to capture both volume-driven opportunities and specialized, higher-margin segments. At the same time, smaller, focused manufacturers leverage agility to serve niche polymer-grade and elastomer markets, offering tighter quality control and faster product development cycles for customers with exacting specifications.
Across the landscape, companies are deploying a mix of strategies to strengthen resilience and growth. Some have prioritized strategic alliances and joint ventures to secure feedstock and share technical risk, while others have invested in modular plants and targeted retrofits to improve the selectivity and yield of specific production routes. Technology licensing and catalyst partnerships are increasingly important, as incremental improvements in selectivity or energy efficiency can materially enhance competitiveness. In addition, firms that proactively address sustainability through energy optimization, lower-emission processes, and circularity initiatives tend to find easier access to certain customer segments and financing channels. Observing these strategic patterns helps illuminate where potential partners or competitors may direct future capital and which capabilities will be most valuable in the coming planning cycles.
Practical strategic moves for senior leaders to secure feedstock flexibility, enhance production selectivity, and align investments with downstream premium opportunities and sustainability goals
Industry leaders should prioritize a pragmatic set of actions to protect margins, secure feedstock flexibility, and capture downstream premium opportunities. First, diversify procurement by combining refinery-linked streams with qualified on-purpose producers to balance cost efficiency and quality control; this dual-track approach reduces exposure to geopolitical and tariff-related shocks and enables rapid switching between supply sources when needed. Second, accelerate projects that enhance production selectivity-such as catalyst upgrades for catalytic dehydration or retrofits to improve metathesis yields-because even modest improvements in impurity profiles and energy intensity can open access to higher-value polymer and specialty markets.
Third, pursue strategic partnerships across the value chain, including co-development agreements with downstream polymer and elastomer manufacturers, to shorten qualification cycles and co-create application-specific grades. Fourth, re-evaluate inventory and logistics strategies to focus buffer stocks on critical, high-margin grades while improving just-in-time capabilities for more commoditized streams. Fifth, embed sustainability metrics into capital allocation and supplier selection, prioritizing projects that reduce emissions intensity and enhance circular feedstock use, as these criteria increasingly influence customer procurement and financing terms. Finally, invest in scenario planning and flexible asset designs to accommodate regulatory shifts and trade policy fluctuations, ensuring that investment choices remain robust across plausible futures.
A rigorous multi-method research framework blending primary stakeholder interviews, technical modeling, and competitive benchmarking to validate strategic conclusions for decision-makers
The research methodology underpinning this executive summary combines multi-source intelligence, technical validation, and stakeholder consultation to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary inputs include structured interviews with production engineers, procurement leads, and product development managers to capture operational realities, supplier dynamics, and qualification timelines. Secondary inputs incorporate open-source regulatory filings, process engineering literature, and publicly available industry reports to contextualize technological trajectories and historical policy shifts. These sources were triangulated to cross-validate assertions about process performance, feedstock characteristics, and downstream quality requirements.
Analytical techniques included comparative process modeling to assess relative impurity profiles and energy intensity across production routes, supply chain mapping to identify critical nodes and alternative trade corridors, and qualitative competitive benchmarking to understand strategic positioning and partnership activity. Findings were stress-tested through sensitivity analyses and reviewed with subject-matter experts to mitigate bias and surface divergent perspectives. Throughout, data integrity practices-such as traceability of sources, version control for modeling inputs, and transparent assumptions-were applied to ensure that conclusions are defensible and actionable for commercial and technical stakeholders seeking to translate insights into operational plans.
A concise synthesis of strategic imperatives emphasizing agility, selectivity, and targeted capability building to convert market dynamics into competitive advantage
In sum, the isobutene landscape is at an inflection point where feedstock choices, production technology evolution, and policy dynamics converge to reshape commercial priorities. The combination of tariff-driven procurement shifts, technological progress in catalytic and metathesis pathways, and differentiated downstream requirements for polymer and elastomer grades means that agility and technical competence have become primary sources of competitive advantage. Firms that can balance scale with selectivity, secure diversified supply chains, and move quickly on targeted process improvements will be best positioned to capture higher-value opportunities while mitigating margin erosion from trade volatility.
The practical implication is clear: strategic clarity, rapid supplier qualification, and selective investment in process enhancements should be elevated in corporate planning. These steps will allow organizations to protect critical production flows, respond to changing regulatory environments, and collaborate effectively with downstream customers to co-develop grades that meet new performance and sustainability expectations. Stakeholders using the insights in this summary can prioritize near-term tactical moves that align with longer-term capability building, thereby converting market intelligence into concrete competitive gains.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Strategic alliances between petrochemical producers and biotech firms accelerating bio-based isobutene commercialization initiatives
- 5.2. Adoption of advanced membrane separation technologies to improve isobutene purification efficiency and reduce energy consumption
- 5.3. Rising automotive industry demand for isobutene-based butyl rubber to enhance tire durability and fuel economy
- 5.4. Implementation of catalyst optimization in isobutene oligomerization processes to boost sustainable aviation fuel and lubricant production
- 5.5. Impact of volatile naphtha feedstock prices on global isobutene production economics and supply chain stability
- 5.6. Expansion of on-purpose isobutene plants in Asia–Pacific driven by growing demand for high-octane gasoline blending components
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Isobutene Market, by Source
- 8.1. Fcc Byproduct
- 8.2. On-Purpose Production
- 8.2.1. Butane Dehydrogenation
- 8.2.2. Catalytic Dehydration
- 8.2.3. Olefin Metathesis
- 9. Isobutene Market, by Production Technology
- 9.1. Catalytic Dehydration
- 9.2. Fluid Catalytic Cracking
- 9.3. Metathesis
- 9.4. Thermal Cracking
- 10. Isobutene Market, by Grade
- 10.1. Chemical Grade
- 10.2. Fuel Grade
- 10.3. Polymer Grade
- 11. Isobutene Market, by End Use
- 11.1. Alkylation
- 11.1.1. Diesel Alkylation
- 11.1.2. Gasoline Alkylation
- 11.2. Butyl Rubber
- 11.2.1. Bromobutyl Rubber
- 11.2.2. Chlorobutyl Rubber
- 11.2.3. Standard Butyl Rubber
- 11.3. Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether
- 11.4. Polybutene
- 11.5. Polyisobutylene
- 11.5.1. High Viscosity
- 11.5.2. Low Viscosity
- 11.5.3. Medium Viscosity
- 12. Isobutene Market, by End Use Industry
- 12.1. Automotive
- 12.2. Construction
- 12.3. Electrical & Electronics
- 12.4. Packaging
- 13. Isobutene Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Isobutene Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Isobutene Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Baker Hughes Company
- 16.3.2. BASF SE
- 16.3.3. Butamax Advanced Biofuels, LLC
- 16.3.4. Clariant AG
- 16.3.5. Eastman Chemical Company
- 16.3.6. Evonik Industries AG
- 16.3.7. Exxon Mobil Corporation
- 16.3.8. Gevo, Inc.
- 16.3.9. Global Bioenergies Group
- 16.3.10. Honeywell International Inc.
- 16.3.11. INEOS AG
- 16.3.12. Lanxess AG
- 16.3.13. Linde PLC
- 16.3.14. LyondellBasell Industries Holdings B.V.
- 16.3.15. Merck KGaA
- 16.3.16. Praxair Technology, Inc.
- 16.3.17. Schlumberger Limited
- 16.3.18. Shandong Yuhuang Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.19. Sumitomo Chemical Co.Ltd.
- 16.3.20. The Dow Chemical Company
- 16.3.21. Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.22. Vinati Organics Limited
- 16.3.23. Weifang Binhai Petro-Chem Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.24. Yeochun NCC Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
