IoT in Intelligent Transportation System Market by Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Connectivity Type (Cellular, LPWAN, Satellite), Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The IoT in Intelligent Transportation System Market was valued at USD 56.94 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 62.32 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.88%, reaching USD 121.02 billion by 2032.
A concise introduction to how connected sensors, resilient communications, and edge software are redefining operational architectures in modern transportation systems
The convergence of connected devices, advanced sensing, and resilient communication architectures is reshaping how transportation networks operate, manage capacity, and deliver services to users. Recent advances in embedded processors, low-power wide-area networking, and edge software platforms have created practical pathways for decentralized intelligence-allowing sensors and gateways to make localized decisions that reduce latency, conserve bandwidth, and improve reliability. As a result, transportation authorities and operators increasingly consider IoT-led architectures not as experimental pilot projects but as foundational elements of urban mobility strategy.
These technological enablers sit alongside evolving policy frameworks and public expectations around safety, sustainability, and accessibility. Municipalities are prioritizing initiatives that improve traffic flow, reduce emissions, and enhance user experience, while logistics operators seek real-time visibility that optimizes routing and asset utilization. Consequently, stakeholders must navigate a complex interplay of regulatory compliance, procurement cycles, and legacy asset integration when planning deployments. Understanding the technical building blocks, integration pressures, and stakeholder incentives is essential for designing solutions that deliver measurable operational benefits without introducing undue risk or complexity.
How distributed edge intelligence, advanced connectivity, and interoperable software stacks are driving a fundamental transformation in intelligent transportation architectures
In recent years the landscape of intelligent transportation systems has shifted from centralized processing to distributed, software-defined architectures that prioritize real-time responsiveness and modular scalability. Edge computing nodes now handle critical decision-making tasks previously confined to centralized data centers, which reduces latency for safety-critical functions and conserves backbone bandwidth for aggregated analytics. At the same time, advancements in cellular connectivity, particularly the maturation of 5G capabilities for ultra-reliable low-latency communications, are enabling new classes of vehicle-to-infrastructure and vehicle-to-everything use cases.
Parallel to connectivity improvements, sensor miniaturization and energy efficiency have expanded the range of deployable endpoints, from compact environmental sensors embedded in street furniture to integrated telematics modules within commercial fleets. Software layers have evolved accordingly, with middleware platforms that abstract hardware heterogeneity and provide secure device lifecycle management. These shifts are accompanied by a stronger emphasis on open standards and interoperability, driven by ecosystem participants who recognize that locked-in solutions hinder long-term viability. Finally, the commercial model is moving toward outcome-based contracts and managed service offerings, allowing public agencies and private operators to procure capabilities while outsourcing operational complexity and risk.
Assessment of how recent US tariff measures have reshaped sourcing strategies, supply chain resilience, and procurement practices for hardware-intensive transportation deployments
Tariff policies implemented across the United States in 2025 have introduced new dynamics into global supply chains, with particular implications for hardware-dependent sectors such as intelligent transportation systems. Increased duties on certain electronic components and modules have prompted manufacturers and integrators to reassess sourcing strategies, pushing some to seek alternate suppliers, regionalize production, or redesign devices to substitute tariff-implicated parts. These adjustments have affected lead times and pushed procurement teams to build additional resilience into their bill of materials planning.
As a result, procurement cycles now frequently include multi-sourcing clauses and component substitution plans to mitigate single-source exposure. Moreover, procurement teams have intensified collaboration with engineering to identify design modifications that preserve performance while reducing tariff liabilities. In parallel, systems integrators and solution providers are offering configuration flexibility, allowing clients to select hardware variants that align with regional trade conditions. Regulatory uncertainty has also increased the premium on supply chain visibility tools and contract terms that enable price adjustments in response to imposed duties. Moving forward, organizations that combine robust supplier risk assessment with agile integration practices will be better positioned to sustain deployment momentum despite tariff-driven volatility.
Segmentation-driven insights that align component stacks, application demands, connectivity choices, and end-user priorities to accelerate successful transportation technology deployments
Examining the technology landscape through component, application, connectivity type, and end-user lenses reveals differentiated adoption patterns and investment priorities across the ecosystem. From a component perspective the landscape includes hardware, services, and software, where hardware encompasses connectivity modules, memory, processors, and sensors, services cover managed services and professional services, and software spans application software, middleware, and operating systems. These layers interact tightly: optimized middleware and operating systems enable heterogeneous hardware to present unified interfaces, while application software translates raw telemetry into actionable operational insights. Consequently, organizations should evaluate both vertical integration and modularity when selecting vendors, paying attention to software support for lifecycle updates and device management.
When viewed by application the principal use cases include electronic toll collection, fleet management, passenger information systems, smart parking, and traffic management. Each application imposes unique requirements for latency, accuracy, and data volume. For instance, electronic tolling emphasizes secure transaction processing and identity management, whereas fleet management focuses on telematics, route optimization, and driver safety analytics. Passenger information systems and smart parking require reliable short-range communications and real-time status updates, and traffic management demands robust aggregation of sensor inputs to inform signal timing and congestion alleviation strategies. Aligning technology choices with the specific service-level expectations of each application reduces integration risk and improves end-user satisfaction.
Connectivity type further segments deployments across cellular, LPWAN, satellite, and short-range options, where cellular splits into 4G and 5G, LPWAN includes LoRaWAN and NB-IoT, and short-range encompasses Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. Each connectivity class offers trade-offs: cellular provides broad coverage and mobility support, LPWAN extends battery life for low-bandwidth sensors, satellite fills gaps in remote coverage, and short-range links enable localized interactions such as parking spot detection or passenger information kiosks. Selecting the appropriate connectivity mix depends on deployment density, power constraints, and expected data throughput. Lastly, the end-user profile-covering government agencies, logistics companies, private fleet operators, and public transport operators-shapes procurement timelines, compliance requirements, and acceptable total cost of ownership horizons, meaning solution vendors must tailor contractual terms and integration support to the operational realities of each buyer type.
Regional analysis highlighting how infrastructure priorities, regulatory frameworks, and procurement practices diverge across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Geographical dynamics exert a strong influence on technology adoption pathways, regulatory constraints, and commercial models across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas infrastructure modernization programs and sizable metropolitan areas are creating concentrated demand for integrated traffic management and fleet telematics solutions. Public-private partnerships and regional funding mechanisms shape procurement timetables, favoring solutions that can demonstrate interoperability with legacy systems and compliance with privacy laws. Across this region operators place heightened emphasis on data security and regulatory alignment, prompting vendors to provide transparent governance and audit capabilities.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa the regulatory environment often prioritizes emissions reduction, urban mobility, and accessibility, leading to strategic initiatives that bundle smart parking, passenger information, and traffic management into city-wide mobility platforms. Procurement in this region frequently emphasizes standards adherence and long-term maintainability, creating opportunities for vendors who can demonstrate modular upgrade paths and strong systems integration competencies. In contrast, the Asia-Pacific region exhibits rapid deployment cycles driven by high urban density and aggressive digitization agendas, with governments and private operators pursuing large-scale rollouts of electronic tolling and fleet management solutions. Regional supply chain strengths and local manufacturing capabilities also influence how providers structure offerings, with an increasing number of regional partnerships formed to accelerate time-to-deployment and localize support services.
Insightful perspectives on the ecosystem roles of component suppliers, connectivity carriers, platform providers, and integrators shaping competitive dynamics in transportation solutions
Competitive dynamics in intelligent transportation systems are shaped by an ecosystem composed of component manufacturers, connectivity providers, software platform vendors, systems integrators, and specialized service firms. Chipmakers and module suppliers continue to advance energy efficiency and integration density, enabling smaller, more capable endpoints that reduce installation complexity. Connectivity providers are differentiating through service quality, private network options, and managed connectivity plans that include SIM lifecycle management and roaming optimization. Meanwhile, software platform vendors focus on creating extensible middleware and developer ecosystems that simplify device onboarding, telemetry normalization, and data exchange across municipal and enterprise systems.
Systems integrators and professional service firms play a critical role in bridging the gap between technology capability and operational needs, offering design, deployment, and ongoing managed services that address local regulatory and physical infrastructure challenges. Partnerships between hardware vendors and integrators are increasingly common, as are offerings that bundle hardware, connectivity, and managed services under outcome-oriented contracts. For organizations evaluating suppliers, the most telling indicators of capability include demonstrated interoperability, field-proven deployments, and the ability to support lifecycle updates and cyber resilience. Firms that combine deep domain expertise in transport operations with strong implementation delivery records are most likely to succeed in complex deployments that require multi-stakeholder coordination.
Practical, actionable recommendations for executives to balance innovation, resilience, and operational reliability when scaling intelligent transportation initiatives
Industry leaders must adopt pragmatic strategies that balance innovation with operational reliability to accelerate adoption and realize measurable benefits from intelligent transportation investments. First, pursue modular architectures that decouple hardware refresh cycles from core software capabilities so that edge nodes can be upgraded independently and integrations remain sustainable over time. This approach reduces vendor lock-in and enables iterative enhancement of analytics and user-facing services. Second, embed supply chain risk assessments into early-stage procurement decisions, including multi-sourcing and component substitution clauses that mitigate exposure to trade policy shifts and component shortages.
Third, prioritize secure-by-design practices across device firmware, communications, and backend services to address growing cybersecurity and privacy concerns; doing so enhances public trust and reduces potential liabilities. Fourth, engage in standards-based interoperability initiatives and open APIs to ensure that deployed solutions can integrate with municipal platforms, third-party mobility services, and future data exchange frameworks. Finally, invest in partnership models and managed service agreements that transfer operational complexity and allow owners to focus on service outcomes rather than device maintenance. By embracing these actions, leaders can reduce deployment friction, improve stakeholder alignment, and accelerate the transition from pilots to sustained operations.
Transparent research methodology detailing the evidence sources, expert consultations, and analytical approach used to derive actionable insights for decision-makers
This research synthesizes publicly available technical literature, regulatory filings, industry standards documentation, vendor technical briefs, and interviews with subject-matter experts across hardware, connectivity, software, and services domains. Primary insights were derived from vendor product specifications, white papers, and applied case studies that illustrate deployment patterns and integration challenges. Additionally, expert interviews included perspectives from systems integrators, municipal transit agencies, fleet operators, and technology architects to validate real-world constraints and operational requirements.
The analytical approach combined qualitative synthesis with comparative assessment of technology trade-offs, supply chain exposure, and procurement practices. Emphasis was placed on cross-referencing multiple independent sources to ensure accuracy and to highlight convergent trends. Where relevant, technical details around communications protocols, device management practices, and cybersecurity expectations were corroborated with standards bodies and industry consortium guidance. The methodology prioritized transparency of assumptions, clear delineation of evidence types, and a focus on actionable intelligence that supports strategic decision-making without presuming specific budgetary or temporal parameters.
Concluding synthesis that ties technological advances, procurement resilience, and interoperability to achievable operational benefits in modern transportation networks
In closing, the adoption of IoT-driven intelligent transportation systems is transitioning from exploratory pilots to strategic deployments that materially affect mobility, logistics, and urban management. Technological advances in sensing, connectivity, and edge computing now make it feasible to deliver real-time insights and automated controls that improve safety, reduce congestion, and enhance user experience. However, successful deployment requires careful alignment of technology choices with application requirements, robust supply chain planning in light of trade policy shifts, and a sustained commitment to interoperability and cybersecurity.
Therefore, organizations that combine domain expertise with flexible procurement models and strong vendor governance will be best positioned to extract operational value while minimizing risk. Thoughtful integration of managed services can accelerate this transition by reducing internal operational burdens and providing access to specialized skills. Ultimately, the most successful implementations will be those that pair tactical execution excellence with strategic vision-embedding data-driven decision-making into the fabric of transportation operations and policy implementation.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise introduction to how connected sensors, resilient communications, and edge software are redefining operational architectures in modern transportation systems
The convergence of connected devices, advanced sensing, and resilient communication architectures is reshaping how transportation networks operate, manage capacity, and deliver services to users. Recent advances in embedded processors, low-power wide-area networking, and edge software platforms have created practical pathways for decentralized intelligence-allowing sensors and gateways to make localized decisions that reduce latency, conserve bandwidth, and improve reliability. As a result, transportation authorities and operators increasingly consider IoT-led architectures not as experimental pilot projects but as foundational elements of urban mobility strategy.
These technological enablers sit alongside evolving policy frameworks and public expectations around safety, sustainability, and accessibility. Municipalities are prioritizing initiatives that improve traffic flow, reduce emissions, and enhance user experience, while logistics operators seek real-time visibility that optimizes routing and asset utilization. Consequently, stakeholders must navigate a complex interplay of regulatory compliance, procurement cycles, and legacy asset integration when planning deployments. Understanding the technical building blocks, integration pressures, and stakeholder incentives is essential for designing solutions that deliver measurable operational benefits without introducing undue risk or complexity.
How distributed edge intelligence, advanced connectivity, and interoperable software stacks are driving a fundamental transformation in intelligent transportation architectures
In recent years the landscape of intelligent transportation systems has shifted from centralized processing to distributed, software-defined architectures that prioritize real-time responsiveness and modular scalability. Edge computing nodes now handle critical decision-making tasks previously confined to centralized data centers, which reduces latency for safety-critical functions and conserves backbone bandwidth for aggregated analytics. At the same time, advancements in cellular connectivity, particularly the maturation of 5G capabilities for ultra-reliable low-latency communications, are enabling new classes of vehicle-to-infrastructure and vehicle-to-everything use cases.
Parallel to connectivity improvements, sensor miniaturization and energy efficiency have expanded the range of deployable endpoints, from compact environmental sensors embedded in street furniture to integrated telematics modules within commercial fleets. Software layers have evolved accordingly, with middleware platforms that abstract hardware heterogeneity and provide secure device lifecycle management. These shifts are accompanied by a stronger emphasis on open standards and interoperability, driven by ecosystem participants who recognize that locked-in solutions hinder long-term viability. Finally, the commercial model is moving toward outcome-based contracts and managed service offerings, allowing public agencies and private operators to procure capabilities while outsourcing operational complexity and risk.
Assessment of how recent US tariff measures have reshaped sourcing strategies, supply chain resilience, and procurement practices for hardware-intensive transportation deployments
Tariff policies implemented across the United States in 2025 have introduced new dynamics into global supply chains, with particular implications for hardware-dependent sectors such as intelligent transportation systems. Increased duties on certain electronic components and modules have prompted manufacturers and integrators to reassess sourcing strategies, pushing some to seek alternate suppliers, regionalize production, or redesign devices to substitute tariff-implicated parts. These adjustments have affected lead times and pushed procurement teams to build additional resilience into their bill of materials planning.
As a result, procurement cycles now frequently include multi-sourcing clauses and component substitution plans to mitigate single-source exposure. Moreover, procurement teams have intensified collaboration with engineering to identify design modifications that preserve performance while reducing tariff liabilities. In parallel, systems integrators and solution providers are offering configuration flexibility, allowing clients to select hardware variants that align with regional trade conditions. Regulatory uncertainty has also increased the premium on supply chain visibility tools and contract terms that enable price adjustments in response to imposed duties. Moving forward, organizations that combine robust supplier risk assessment with agile integration practices will be better positioned to sustain deployment momentum despite tariff-driven volatility.
Segmentation-driven insights that align component stacks, application demands, connectivity choices, and end-user priorities to accelerate successful transportation technology deployments
Examining the technology landscape through component, application, connectivity type, and end-user lenses reveals differentiated adoption patterns and investment priorities across the ecosystem. From a component perspective the landscape includes hardware, services, and software, where hardware encompasses connectivity modules, memory, processors, and sensors, services cover managed services and professional services, and software spans application software, middleware, and operating systems. These layers interact tightly: optimized middleware and operating systems enable heterogeneous hardware to present unified interfaces, while application software translates raw telemetry into actionable operational insights. Consequently, organizations should evaluate both vertical integration and modularity when selecting vendors, paying attention to software support for lifecycle updates and device management.
When viewed by application the principal use cases include electronic toll collection, fleet management, passenger information systems, smart parking, and traffic management. Each application imposes unique requirements for latency, accuracy, and data volume. For instance, electronic tolling emphasizes secure transaction processing and identity management, whereas fleet management focuses on telematics, route optimization, and driver safety analytics. Passenger information systems and smart parking require reliable short-range communications and real-time status updates, and traffic management demands robust aggregation of sensor inputs to inform signal timing and congestion alleviation strategies. Aligning technology choices with the specific service-level expectations of each application reduces integration risk and improves end-user satisfaction.
Connectivity type further segments deployments across cellular, LPWAN, satellite, and short-range options, where cellular splits into 4G and 5G, LPWAN includes LoRaWAN and NB-IoT, and short-range encompasses Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. Each connectivity class offers trade-offs: cellular provides broad coverage and mobility support, LPWAN extends battery life for low-bandwidth sensors, satellite fills gaps in remote coverage, and short-range links enable localized interactions such as parking spot detection or passenger information kiosks. Selecting the appropriate connectivity mix depends on deployment density, power constraints, and expected data throughput. Lastly, the end-user profile-covering government agencies, logistics companies, private fleet operators, and public transport operators-shapes procurement timelines, compliance requirements, and acceptable total cost of ownership horizons, meaning solution vendors must tailor contractual terms and integration support to the operational realities of each buyer type.
Regional analysis highlighting how infrastructure priorities, regulatory frameworks, and procurement practices diverge across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Geographical dynamics exert a strong influence on technology adoption pathways, regulatory constraints, and commercial models across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas infrastructure modernization programs and sizable metropolitan areas are creating concentrated demand for integrated traffic management and fleet telematics solutions. Public-private partnerships and regional funding mechanisms shape procurement timetables, favoring solutions that can demonstrate interoperability with legacy systems and compliance with privacy laws. Across this region operators place heightened emphasis on data security and regulatory alignment, prompting vendors to provide transparent governance and audit capabilities.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa the regulatory environment often prioritizes emissions reduction, urban mobility, and accessibility, leading to strategic initiatives that bundle smart parking, passenger information, and traffic management into city-wide mobility platforms. Procurement in this region frequently emphasizes standards adherence and long-term maintainability, creating opportunities for vendors who can demonstrate modular upgrade paths and strong systems integration competencies. In contrast, the Asia-Pacific region exhibits rapid deployment cycles driven by high urban density and aggressive digitization agendas, with governments and private operators pursuing large-scale rollouts of electronic tolling and fleet management solutions. Regional supply chain strengths and local manufacturing capabilities also influence how providers structure offerings, with an increasing number of regional partnerships formed to accelerate time-to-deployment and localize support services.
Insightful perspectives on the ecosystem roles of component suppliers, connectivity carriers, platform providers, and integrators shaping competitive dynamics in transportation solutions
Competitive dynamics in intelligent transportation systems are shaped by an ecosystem composed of component manufacturers, connectivity providers, software platform vendors, systems integrators, and specialized service firms. Chipmakers and module suppliers continue to advance energy efficiency and integration density, enabling smaller, more capable endpoints that reduce installation complexity. Connectivity providers are differentiating through service quality, private network options, and managed connectivity plans that include SIM lifecycle management and roaming optimization. Meanwhile, software platform vendors focus on creating extensible middleware and developer ecosystems that simplify device onboarding, telemetry normalization, and data exchange across municipal and enterprise systems.
Systems integrators and professional service firms play a critical role in bridging the gap between technology capability and operational needs, offering design, deployment, and ongoing managed services that address local regulatory and physical infrastructure challenges. Partnerships between hardware vendors and integrators are increasingly common, as are offerings that bundle hardware, connectivity, and managed services under outcome-oriented contracts. For organizations evaluating suppliers, the most telling indicators of capability include demonstrated interoperability, field-proven deployments, and the ability to support lifecycle updates and cyber resilience. Firms that combine deep domain expertise in transport operations with strong implementation delivery records are most likely to succeed in complex deployments that require multi-stakeholder coordination.
Practical, actionable recommendations for executives to balance innovation, resilience, and operational reliability when scaling intelligent transportation initiatives
Industry leaders must adopt pragmatic strategies that balance innovation with operational reliability to accelerate adoption and realize measurable benefits from intelligent transportation investments. First, pursue modular architectures that decouple hardware refresh cycles from core software capabilities so that edge nodes can be upgraded independently and integrations remain sustainable over time. This approach reduces vendor lock-in and enables iterative enhancement of analytics and user-facing services. Second, embed supply chain risk assessments into early-stage procurement decisions, including multi-sourcing and component substitution clauses that mitigate exposure to trade policy shifts and component shortages.
Third, prioritize secure-by-design practices across device firmware, communications, and backend services to address growing cybersecurity and privacy concerns; doing so enhances public trust and reduces potential liabilities. Fourth, engage in standards-based interoperability initiatives and open APIs to ensure that deployed solutions can integrate with municipal platforms, third-party mobility services, and future data exchange frameworks. Finally, invest in partnership models and managed service agreements that transfer operational complexity and allow owners to focus on service outcomes rather than device maintenance. By embracing these actions, leaders can reduce deployment friction, improve stakeholder alignment, and accelerate the transition from pilots to sustained operations.
Transparent research methodology detailing the evidence sources, expert consultations, and analytical approach used to derive actionable insights for decision-makers
This research synthesizes publicly available technical literature, regulatory filings, industry standards documentation, vendor technical briefs, and interviews with subject-matter experts across hardware, connectivity, software, and services domains. Primary insights were derived from vendor product specifications, white papers, and applied case studies that illustrate deployment patterns and integration challenges. Additionally, expert interviews included perspectives from systems integrators, municipal transit agencies, fleet operators, and technology architects to validate real-world constraints and operational requirements.
The analytical approach combined qualitative synthesis with comparative assessment of technology trade-offs, supply chain exposure, and procurement practices. Emphasis was placed on cross-referencing multiple independent sources to ensure accuracy and to highlight convergent trends. Where relevant, technical details around communications protocols, device management practices, and cybersecurity expectations were corroborated with standards bodies and industry consortium guidance. The methodology prioritized transparency of assumptions, clear delineation of evidence types, and a focus on actionable intelligence that supports strategic decision-making without presuming specific budgetary or temporal parameters.
Concluding synthesis that ties technological advances, procurement resilience, and interoperability to achievable operational benefits in modern transportation networks
In closing, the adoption of IoT-driven intelligent transportation systems is transitioning from exploratory pilots to strategic deployments that materially affect mobility, logistics, and urban management. Technological advances in sensing, connectivity, and edge computing now make it feasible to deliver real-time insights and automated controls that improve safety, reduce congestion, and enhance user experience. However, successful deployment requires careful alignment of technology choices with application requirements, robust supply chain planning in light of trade policy shifts, and a sustained commitment to interoperability and cybersecurity.
Therefore, organizations that combine domain expertise with flexible procurement models and strong vendor governance will be best positioned to extract operational value while minimizing risk. Thoughtful integration of managed services can accelerate this transition by reducing internal operational burdens and providing access to specialized skills. Ultimately, the most successful implementations will be those that pair tactical execution excellence with strategic vision-embedding data-driven decision-making into the fabric of transportation operations and policy implementation.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
183 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of 5G connectivity to enable real-time vehicle-to-everything communication for improved traffic management
- 5.2. Deployment of edge computing frameworks to analyze autonomous vehicle sensor data for real-time decision making
- 5.3. Adoption of blockchain solutions to secure vehicle data exchange and prevent IoT cyberattacks in transport networks
- 5.4. Implementation of AI-powered predictive maintenance platforms for public transit fleets to minimize operational downtime
- 5.5. Use of digital twin simulations to model citywide traffic patterns and optimize urban mobility infrastructure planning
- 5.6. Development of multi-modal mobility platforms integrating ride-sharing micro-mobility and public transit through unified IoT data
- 5.7. Introduction of energy-efficient IoT sensor networks with wireless charging infrastructure for electric vehicle fleets
- 5.8. Standardization of interoperability protocols for cross-border vehicle data sharing among automotive OEMs and government agencies
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. IoT in Intelligent Transportation System Market, by Component
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Connectivity Modules
- 8.1.2. Memory
- 8.1.3. Processors
- 8.1.4. Sensors
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Managed Services
- 8.2.2. Professional Services
- 8.3. Software
- 8.3.1. Application Software
- 8.3.2. Middleware
- 8.3.3. Operating Systems
- 9. IoT in Intelligent Transportation System Market, by Connectivity Type
- 9.1. Cellular
- 9.1.1. 4G
- 9.1.2. 5G
- 9.2. LPWAN
- 9.3. Satellite
- 9.4. Short-Range
- 9.4.1. Bluetooth
- 9.4.2. Wi-Fi
- 10. IoT in Intelligent Transportation System Market, by Application
- 10.1. Electronic Toll Collection
- 10.2. Fleet Management
- 10.3. Passenger Information System
- 10.4. Smart Parking
- 10.5. Traffic Management
- 11. IoT in Intelligent Transportation System Market, by End User
- 11.1. Government Agencies
- 11.2. Logistics Companies
- 11.3. Private Fleet Operators
- 11.4. Public Transport Operators
- 12. IoT in Intelligent Transportation System Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. IoT in Intelligent Transportation System Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. IoT in Intelligent Transportation System Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Broadcom Inc.
- 15.3.2. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 15.3.3. Continental AG
- 15.3.4. Cubic Corporation
- 15.3.5. DENSO CORPORATION
- 15.3.6. Garmin Ltd.
- 15.3.7. Hitachi, Ltd.
- 15.3.8. Honeywell International Inc.
- 15.3.9. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.10. Indra Sistemas, S.A.
- 15.3.11. International Business Machines Corporation
- 15.3.12. Kapsch TrafficCom AG
- 15.3.13. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 15.3.14. Samsara Inc.
- 15.3.15. SAP SE
- 15.3.16. Siemens AG
- 15.3.17. Thales S.A.
- 15.3.18. TomTom N.V.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
