Injection Molding Machinery Market by Application (Automotive, Consumer Goods, Electronics), Machine Type (Horizontal, Hybrid, Vertical), Clamping Force, Material Processed, Drive Type, Control System, Screw Diameter - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Injection Molding Machinery Market was valued at USD 17.42 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 18.29 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.10%, reaching USD 24.70 billion by 2032.
A strategic framing for injection molding machinery that links machine performance, digital integration and lifecycle value for procurement and operations leaders
Injection molding machinery sits at the intersection of industrial precision and high-volume manufacturing, and executives must see it as both a capital asset and a platform for operational advantage. The industry is evolving rapidly as manufacturers demand machines that deliver faster cycle times, improved energy efficiency, tighter process control, and seamless integration with digital production systems. These pressures are driving a shift from traditional hardware-centric purchasing toward systems that combine mechanical performance with software-enabled productivity outcomes.
Decision-makers are balancing competing priorities: reducing total cost of ownership while improving part quality and regulatory compliance for end markets such as medical and automotive. Investment planning increasingly factors in serviceability, retrofit potential, and lifecycle flexibility. As a result, procurement teams work more closely with engineering and sustainability functions to ensure that new machine acquisitions align with broader plant modernization roadmaps. Understanding machine-level nuances-from drive type to control architecture-has become essential for capturing value across production, maintenance, and warranty cycles.
Technological convergence, renewables-driven material shifts, and service-centric business models are redefining how manufacturers select and operate injection molding equipment
The landscape for injection molding machinery is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological convergence, sustainability commitments, and changing end-market demands. Electrification of drives has accelerated as manufacturers prioritize energy efficiency and predictable maintenance profiles, enabling more precise motion control and lower operational emissions. At the same time, hybrid architectures are gaining traction where the torque and force characteristics of hydraulic systems remain advantageous for specific part geometries and high-tonnage applications.
Digitalization is equally influential: connectivity and advanced control systems enable real-time process monitoring, adaptive control loops, and data-driven quality assurance that compress time-to-first-good-part. Materials innovation adds another dimension, with broader adoption of bioplastics and engineered elastomers requiring rethinking of screw geometry, barrel heating profiles, and cycle strategies. Finally, the competitive landscape is reshaping around service models and software ecosystems; vendors that offer predictive maintenance, retrofit pathways, and integration services position themselves as strategic partners rather than mere equipment suppliers. Together, these shifts are redefining procurement criteria and elevating the importance of cross-functional planning between R&D, manufacturing and supply chain teams.
Policy-driven import costs and evolving tariff dynamics are prompting supply chain redesigns, local sourcing strategies, and financing shifts among equipment buyers
Tariff policy changes in 2025 have introduced renewed complexity into capital procurement and supply chain planning for injection molding machinery. Increased duties on certain categories of imported equipment and components have shifted supplier evaluation frameworks, prompting many buyers to reexamine total landed cost and supplier diversification strategies. Procurement teams are now layering tariff sensitivity analysis into vendor selection, balancing the immediate price impact against lead times, local service capabilities, and long-term partnership value.
The cumulative effect of tariffs has also accelerated conversations about regional sourcing and in-market assembly. Some manufacturers are exploring localized supply agreements or strategic partnerships with domestic builders to mitigate exposure to cross-border duties. At the same time, aftermarket service, spare parts logistics, and retrofitting of existing assets have become more attractive economic levers because they reduce dependence on tariff-impacted capital purchases. In parallel, finance leaders are rethinking leasing and financing structures to preserve working capital while enabling necessary upgrades, and operations teams are prioritizing retrofits that deliver measurable performance gains without triggering significant import costs.
Segment-specific demand drivers and equipment requirements reveal how application, machine architecture and material choices determine procurement and retrofit priorities
A nuanced segmentation lens is essential to understand how demand and technology requirements diverge across applications and machine specifications. For applications, differences in production speed, regulatory compliance and part complexity create distinct needs across automotive, consumer goods, electronics, medical, and packaging customers; automotive and medical applications often prioritize dimensional stability and traceability while packaging emphasizes cycle speed and cost efficiency.
Machine architecture influences operational fit: horizontal machines remain common for conventional molding tasks, vertical formats find application in insert molding and overmolding operations where vertical clamping and easier access aid automation, and hybrid models bridge the gap when specific force and control characteristics are required. Clamping force segmentation drives equipment selection across tonnage ranges; lower-tonnage presses support intricate small-part production, mid-range machines target versatile commercial volumes, and above-1000-ton systems serve heavy structural components.
Material-driven segmentation alters machine design and run parameters: bioplastics and elastomers typically demand specialized screw geometries, barrel coatings and drying systems, whereas thermoplastics and thermosets present differing thermal profiles and hold times. Drive type further differentiates value propositions: electric systems provide energy efficiency and repeatability, hydraulic drives deliver peak force and simplicity, and hybrid drives aim to combine strengths. Control system choices-CNC, microprocessor, or PLC-impact integration complexity and the degree of process automation achievable, while screw diameter selection tailors throughput and shear characteristics to resin type and part geometry. Together these segmentation axes inform purchasing criteria, retrofit priorities, and aftermarket service requirements for different customer cohorts.
Regional demand profiles and service expectations vary across the Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific, shaping procurement preferences and aftersales strategies worldwide
Regional dynamics shape both demand patterns and supply chain configurations for injection molding machinery, and executives must consider geographic contrasts when crafting global strategies. In the Americas, demand leans toward robust service networks and localized support, with investments often driven by automotive, packaging and medical manufacturing clusters that emphasize fast response times and retrofitability to extend machine life.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a pronounced emphasis on sustainability and regulatory compliance, where energy-efficient electrified machines and materials that support circularity receive priority. Customers in this region frequently demand documentation and traceability features that align with environmental and safety standards, influencing control systems and material handling choices. Asia-Pacific remains a center of volume-driven adoption and technological innovation, with a broad spectrum of machine types-from low-tonnage electric presses for consumer goods to ultra-high-tonnage systems for heavy components-supported by extensive local manufacturing capacity and supplier ecosystems.
These regional profiles also affect aftersales strategies: service models in the Americas prioritize rapid spare part logistics, EMEA customers look for energy optimization and certification support, while Asia-Pacific stakeholders value competitive pricing, modular scalability and ecosystem interoperability. Understanding these regional distinctions allows leaders to align product portfolios, service footprints and commercial approaches with local customer priorities.
Leaders are winning by combining modular mechanical design with digital services, aftermarket offerings and strategic partnerships to extend customer lifetime value
Competitive dynamics in injection molding machinery are increasingly defined by the ability to couple mechanical excellence with software, services and lifecycle support. Original equipment manufacturers are differentiating through modular designs that facilitate retrofits and ease maintenance, while component suppliers are focusing on advanced motion controls, sensor integration and materials handling that enhance overall system performance. Software vendors and systems integrators are emerging as critical partners by delivering process monitoring, quality analytics and connectivity frameworks that turn machines into data-driven production assets.
Strategic alliances and aftermarket service models are where much of the commercial value is being captured. Companies that offer predictive maintenance, remote diagnostics, and rapid parts provisioning build stickier customer relationships and create recurring revenue streams. In parallel, investment in training, tooling optimization services, and OEM-backed upgrade packages provides a competitive edge by reducing customers’ time-to-performance. Intellectual property around control algorithms, energy recovery systems and specialized barrel or screw technologies also creates differentiation. Together, these developments suggest that market leaders will be those who can offer integrated solutions that lower total operating cost, improve first-pass yield, and provide transparent pathways for future upgrades.
Practical actions for executives to balance new equipment investment, retrofits, supply chain resilience and aftermarket services for durable operational advantage
Industry leaders should adopt a portfolio approach that balances new machine acquisition with targeted retrofits and service contracts to maximize return on capital and operational resilience. Begin by prioritizing investments that deliver measurable improvements in energy consumption and process stability, favoring electrified or hybrid drives where they align with part requirements and lifecycle objectives. Simultaneously, develop retrofit programs that enable existing assets to gain digital controls and remote monitoring capabilities, thereby improving uptime without disproportionate capital outlay.
Supply chain resilience is equally critical: diversify component sourcing, evaluate regional assembly options, and incorporate tariff sensitivity into procurement decisions to reduce exposure to policy shocks. Strengthen aftermarket and service offerings by building predictive maintenance capabilities, improving spare parts logistics, and offering performance-based service agreements. From a talent perspective, invest in cross-disciplinary training that bridges machine mechanics, controls engineering and data analytics to ensure teams can extract value from connected assets. Finally, embed sustainability metrics into procurement and product development decisions so that energy efficiency, recyclability and material selection are considered alongside traditional performance criteria.
A mixed-methods research approach combining primary interviews, technical benchmarking and triangulated secondary analysis to validate operationally relevant insights
The research underlying these insights combined structured primary engagements with targeted technical validation and secondary source synthesis to ensure a robust evidence base. Primary activities included in-depth interviews with plant engineers, procurement leaders, and service managers across representative end markets, supplemented by shop-floor observations to validate process constraints and retrofit opportunities. Technical benchmarking compared machine architectures, drive systems and control platforms under standardized test conditions to surface performance differentials tied to energy use, cycle stability and maintenance accessibility.
Secondary analysis brought together regulatory trends, materials development pipelines, and publicly available case studies to contextualize operational impacts and regional policy drivers. All inputs were triangulated through cross-validation with independent experts and anonymized customer feedback to reduce bias. Limitations include variability in plant-level practices and proprietary process recipes, which can affect absolute performance comparability; therefore, findings emphasize relative performance, strategic implications and actionable pathways rather than prescriptive capital allocation advice.
A synthesis of technological, operational and policy forces that points to machine-level digitalization and lifecycle management as the core competitive differentiator
Injection molding machinery is no longer a discreet capital purchase but a strategic lever for operational transformation. Advances in drive technology, control systems, and materials are creating new performance baselines, while tariff dynamics and regional supply chain realities are influencing where and how companies source equipment and services. The most successful manufacturers will be those that approach machine procurement and lifecycle management holistically-integrating technical specifications with service models, retrofit pathways, and regional logistics planning.
Executives who align engineering, procurement and sustainability objectives will realize the greatest value, extracting improvements in energy consumption, part quality, and equipment uptime. By prioritizing modularity, digital enablement and aftermarket excellence, organizations can reduce exposure to policy shifts and accelerate the realization of performance gains. The strategic choice is clear: treat injection molding assets as connected, upgradeable platforms that require cross-functional governance and continuous improvement to sustain competitiveness.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic framing for injection molding machinery that links machine performance, digital integration and lifecycle value for procurement and operations leaders
Injection molding machinery sits at the intersection of industrial precision and high-volume manufacturing, and executives must see it as both a capital asset and a platform for operational advantage. The industry is evolving rapidly as manufacturers demand machines that deliver faster cycle times, improved energy efficiency, tighter process control, and seamless integration with digital production systems. These pressures are driving a shift from traditional hardware-centric purchasing toward systems that combine mechanical performance with software-enabled productivity outcomes.
Decision-makers are balancing competing priorities: reducing total cost of ownership while improving part quality and regulatory compliance for end markets such as medical and automotive. Investment planning increasingly factors in serviceability, retrofit potential, and lifecycle flexibility. As a result, procurement teams work more closely with engineering and sustainability functions to ensure that new machine acquisitions align with broader plant modernization roadmaps. Understanding machine-level nuances-from drive type to control architecture-has become essential for capturing value across production, maintenance, and warranty cycles.
Technological convergence, renewables-driven material shifts, and service-centric business models are redefining how manufacturers select and operate injection molding equipment
The landscape for injection molding machinery is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological convergence, sustainability commitments, and changing end-market demands. Electrification of drives has accelerated as manufacturers prioritize energy efficiency and predictable maintenance profiles, enabling more precise motion control and lower operational emissions. At the same time, hybrid architectures are gaining traction where the torque and force characteristics of hydraulic systems remain advantageous for specific part geometries and high-tonnage applications.
Digitalization is equally influential: connectivity and advanced control systems enable real-time process monitoring, adaptive control loops, and data-driven quality assurance that compress time-to-first-good-part. Materials innovation adds another dimension, with broader adoption of bioplastics and engineered elastomers requiring rethinking of screw geometry, barrel heating profiles, and cycle strategies. Finally, the competitive landscape is reshaping around service models and software ecosystems; vendors that offer predictive maintenance, retrofit pathways, and integration services position themselves as strategic partners rather than mere equipment suppliers. Together, these shifts are redefining procurement criteria and elevating the importance of cross-functional planning between R&D, manufacturing and supply chain teams.
Policy-driven import costs and evolving tariff dynamics are prompting supply chain redesigns, local sourcing strategies, and financing shifts among equipment buyers
Tariff policy changes in 2025 have introduced renewed complexity into capital procurement and supply chain planning for injection molding machinery. Increased duties on certain categories of imported equipment and components have shifted supplier evaluation frameworks, prompting many buyers to reexamine total landed cost and supplier diversification strategies. Procurement teams are now layering tariff sensitivity analysis into vendor selection, balancing the immediate price impact against lead times, local service capabilities, and long-term partnership value.
The cumulative effect of tariffs has also accelerated conversations about regional sourcing and in-market assembly. Some manufacturers are exploring localized supply agreements or strategic partnerships with domestic builders to mitigate exposure to cross-border duties. At the same time, aftermarket service, spare parts logistics, and retrofitting of existing assets have become more attractive economic levers because they reduce dependence on tariff-impacted capital purchases. In parallel, finance leaders are rethinking leasing and financing structures to preserve working capital while enabling necessary upgrades, and operations teams are prioritizing retrofits that deliver measurable performance gains without triggering significant import costs.
Segment-specific demand drivers and equipment requirements reveal how application, machine architecture and material choices determine procurement and retrofit priorities
A nuanced segmentation lens is essential to understand how demand and technology requirements diverge across applications and machine specifications. For applications, differences in production speed, regulatory compliance and part complexity create distinct needs across automotive, consumer goods, electronics, medical, and packaging customers; automotive and medical applications often prioritize dimensional stability and traceability while packaging emphasizes cycle speed and cost efficiency.
Machine architecture influences operational fit: horizontal machines remain common for conventional molding tasks, vertical formats find application in insert molding and overmolding operations where vertical clamping and easier access aid automation, and hybrid models bridge the gap when specific force and control characteristics are required. Clamping force segmentation drives equipment selection across tonnage ranges; lower-tonnage presses support intricate small-part production, mid-range machines target versatile commercial volumes, and above-1000-ton systems serve heavy structural components.
Material-driven segmentation alters machine design and run parameters: bioplastics and elastomers typically demand specialized screw geometries, barrel coatings and drying systems, whereas thermoplastics and thermosets present differing thermal profiles and hold times. Drive type further differentiates value propositions: electric systems provide energy efficiency and repeatability, hydraulic drives deliver peak force and simplicity, and hybrid drives aim to combine strengths. Control system choices-CNC, microprocessor, or PLC-impact integration complexity and the degree of process automation achievable, while screw diameter selection tailors throughput and shear characteristics to resin type and part geometry. Together these segmentation axes inform purchasing criteria, retrofit priorities, and aftermarket service requirements for different customer cohorts.
Regional demand profiles and service expectations vary across the Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific, shaping procurement preferences and aftersales strategies worldwide
Regional dynamics shape both demand patterns and supply chain configurations for injection molding machinery, and executives must consider geographic contrasts when crafting global strategies. In the Americas, demand leans toward robust service networks and localized support, with investments often driven by automotive, packaging and medical manufacturing clusters that emphasize fast response times and retrofitability to extend machine life.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a pronounced emphasis on sustainability and regulatory compliance, where energy-efficient electrified machines and materials that support circularity receive priority. Customers in this region frequently demand documentation and traceability features that align with environmental and safety standards, influencing control systems and material handling choices. Asia-Pacific remains a center of volume-driven adoption and technological innovation, with a broad spectrum of machine types-from low-tonnage electric presses for consumer goods to ultra-high-tonnage systems for heavy components-supported by extensive local manufacturing capacity and supplier ecosystems.
These regional profiles also affect aftersales strategies: service models in the Americas prioritize rapid spare part logistics, EMEA customers look for energy optimization and certification support, while Asia-Pacific stakeholders value competitive pricing, modular scalability and ecosystem interoperability. Understanding these regional distinctions allows leaders to align product portfolios, service footprints and commercial approaches with local customer priorities.
Leaders are winning by combining modular mechanical design with digital services, aftermarket offerings and strategic partnerships to extend customer lifetime value
Competitive dynamics in injection molding machinery are increasingly defined by the ability to couple mechanical excellence with software, services and lifecycle support. Original equipment manufacturers are differentiating through modular designs that facilitate retrofits and ease maintenance, while component suppliers are focusing on advanced motion controls, sensor integration and materials handling that enhance overall system performance. Software vendors and systems integrators are emerging as critical partners by delivering process monitoring, quality analytics and connectivity frameworks that turn machines into data-driven production assets.
Strategic alliances and aftermarket service models are where much of the commercial value is being captured. Companies that offer predictive maintenance, remote diagnostics, and rapid parts provisioning build stickier customer relationships and create recurring revenue streams. In parallel, investment in training, tooling optimization services, and OEM-backed upgrade packages provides a competitive edge by reducing customers’ time-to-performance. Intellectual property around control algorithms, energy recovery systems and specialized barrel or screw technologies also creates differentiation. Together, these developments suggest that market leaders will be those who can offer integrated solutions that lower total operating cost, improve first-pass yield, and provide transparent pathways for future upgrades.
Practical actions for executives to balance new equipment investment, retrofits, supply chain resilience and aftermarket services for durable operational advantage
Industry leaders should adopt a portfolio approach that balances new machine acquisition with targeted retrofits and service contracts to maximize return on capital and operational resilience. Begin by prioritizing investments that deliver measurable improvements in energy consumption and process stability, favoring electrified or hybrid drives where they align with part requirements and lifecycle objectives. Simultaneously, develop retrofit programs that enable existing assets to gain digital controls and remote monitoring capabilities, thereby improving uptime without disproportionate capital outlay.
Supply chain resilience is equally critical: diversify component sourcing, evaluate regional assembly options, and incorporate tariff sensitivity into procurement decisions to reduce exposure to policy shocks. Strengthen aftermarket and service offerings by building predictive maintenance capabilities, improving spare parts logistics, and offering performance-based service agreements. From a talent perspective, invest in cross-disciplinary training that bridges machine mechanics, controls engineering and data analytics to ensure teams can extract value from connected assets. Finally, embed sustainability metrics into procurement and product development decisions so that energy efficiency, recyclability and material selection are considered alongside traditional performance criteria.
A mixed-methods research approach combining primary interviews, technical benchmarking and triangulated secondary analysis to validate operationally relevant insights
The research underlying these insights combined structured primary engagements with targeted technical validation and secondary source synthesis to ensure a robust evidence base. Primary activities included in-depth interviews with plant engineers, procurement leaders, and service managers across representative end markets, supplemented by shop-floor observations to validate process constraints and retrofit opportunities. Technical benchmarking compared machine architectures, drive systems and control platforms under standardized test conditions to surface performance differentials tied to energy use, cycle stability and maintenance accessibility.
Secondary analysis brought together regulatory trends, materials development pipelines, and publicly available case studies to contextualize operational impacts and regional policy drivers. All inputs were triangulated through cross-validation with independent experts and anonymized customer feedback to reduce bias. Limitations include variability in plant-level practices and proprietary process recipes, which can affect absolute performance comparability; therefore, findings emphasize relative performance, strategic implications and actionable pathways rather than prescriptive capital allocation advice.
A synthesis of technological, operational and policy forces that points to machine-level digitalization and lifecycle management as the core competitive differentiator
Injection molding machinery is no longer a discreet capital purchase but a strategic lever for operational transformation. Advances in drive technology, control systems, and materials are creating new performance baselines, while tariff dynamics and regional supply chain realities are influencing where and how companies source equipment and services. The most successful manufacturers will be those that approach machine procurement and lifecycle management holistically-integrating technical specifications with service models, retrofit pathways, and regional logistics planning.
Executives who align engineering, procurement and sustainability objectives will realize the greatest value, extracting improvements in energy consumption, part quality, and equipment uptime. By prioritizing modularity, digital enablement and aftermarket excellence, organizations can reduce exposure to policy shifts and accelerate the realization of performance gains. The strategic choice is clear: treat injection molding assets as connected, upgradeable platforms that require cross-functional governance and continuous improvement to sustain competitiveness.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Injection Molding Machinery Market, by Application
- 8.1. Automotive
- 8.2. Consumer Goods
- 8.3. Electronics
- 8.4. Medical
- 8.5. Packaging
- 9. Injection Molding Machinery Market, by Machine Type
- 9.1. Horizontal
- 9.2. Hybrid
- 9.3. Vertical
- 10. Injection Molding Machinery Market, by Clamping Force
- 10.1. 500 To 1000 T
- 10.2. Above 1000 T
- 10.3. Less Than 500 T
- 11. Injection Molding Machinery Market, by Material Processed
- 11.1. Bioplastic
- 11.2. Elastomer
- 11.3. Thermoplastic
- 11.4. Thermoset
- 12. Injection Molding Machinery Market, by Drive Type
- 12.1. Electric
- 12.2. Hybrid
- 12.3. Hydraulic
- 13. Injection Molding Machinery Market, by Control System
- 13.1. CNC
- 13.2. Microprocessor
- 13.3. PLC
- 14. Injection Molding Machinery Market, by Screw Diameter
- 14.1. 30 To 60 Mm
- 14.2. Above 60 Mm
- 14.3. Less Than 30 Mm
- 15. Injection Molding Machinery Market, by Region
- 15.1. Americas
- 15.1.1. North America
- 15.1.2. Latin America
- 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 15.2.1. Europe
- 15.2.2. Middle East
- 15.2.3. Africa
- 15.3. Asia-Pacific
- 16. Injection Molding Machinery Market, by Group
- 16.1. ASEAN
- 16.2. GCC
- 16.3. European Union
- 16.4. BRICS
- 16.5. G7
- 16.6. NATO
- 17. Injection Molding Machinery Market, by Country
- 17.1. United States
- 17.2. Canada
- 17.3. Mexico
- 17.4. Brazil
- 17.5. United Kingdom
- 17.6. Germany
- 17.7. France
- 17.8. Russia
- 17.9. Italy
- 17.10. Spain
- 17.11. China
- 17.12. India
- 17.13. Japan
- 17.14. Australia
- 17.15. South Korea
- 18. United States Injection Molding Machinery Market
- 19. China Injection Molding Machinery Market
- 20. Competitive Landscape
- 20.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 20.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 20.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 20.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 20.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 20.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 20.5. Arburg GmbH + Co KG
- 20.6. Borche North America Inc.
- 20.7. BOY Machines, Inc.
- 20.8. Chen Hsong Holdings Limited
- 20.9. Engel Austria Gmbh
- 20.10. FANUC CORPORATION
- 20.11. FU CHUN SHIN MACHINERY MANUFACTURE CO., LTD.
- 20.12. Haitian International Holdings Limited
- 20.13. Haitian Plastics Machinery Group Co., Ltd
- 20.14. Hillenbrand, Inc.
- 20.15. Huarong Group
- 20.16. Husky Technologies
- 20.17. JSW Plastics Machinery Inc.
- 20.18. KraussMaffei Group GmbH
- 20.19. Milacron Holdings Corp.
- 20.20. Nissei Plastic Industrial Co. Ltd
- 20.21. Shibaura Machine Co. Ltd
- 20.22. Sumitomo (SHI) Demag Plastics Machinery GmbH
- 20.23. Wittmann Battenfeld GmbH
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
