Industrial Radiography Equipment Market by Product Type (Hardware, Software, Services), Imaging Technology (Film-based Radiography, Digital Radiography, Real-time Radiography), Source Type, Mobility, Application, End-use Industry - Global Forecast 2026-20
Description
The Industrial Radiography Equipment Market was valued at USD 2.01 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 2.17 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 8.04%, reaching USD 3.46 billion by 2032.
A strategic introduction framing industrial radiography as an indispensable capability for asset integrity, quality assurance, and modern inspection ecosystems
Industrial radiography remains pivotal to ensuring structural integrity, process safety, and regulatory compliance across heavy industries. This introduction situates the technology suite within contemporary inspection programs, describing how radiographic modalities intersect with lifecycle management, non-destructive testing protocols, and the evolving demands of asset operators. The narrative emphasizes that radiography is not merely a detection tool but a strategic capability that underpins operational continuity, enabling early defect detection, quality assurance during manufacture, and evidence-based maintenance decision-making.
Transitioning from legacy practices to more integrated diagnostic ecosystems, stakeholders increasingly view radiographic technology as a component of broader digital inspection strategies that include data management, analytics, and remote collaboration. Consequently, procurement decisions are influenced by considerations beyond raw imaging performance: ease of deployment in constrained environments, compatibility with digital records, personnel safety, and vendor service networks. This introduction clarifies the scope of technologies and product classes covered in the analysis, framing subsequent sections so readers can relate high-level trends to concrete operational use cases and procurement priorities.
How converging detector innovations, service-centric supplier strategies, and workforce digitization are reshaping the industrial radiography landscape for inspection leaders
The landscape of industrial radiography is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology convergence, regulatory emphasis on safety, and the digitalization of inspection workflows. Digital radiography is advancing into more portable and ruggedized form factors while computed radiography retains relevance where retrofit and cost constraints apply, which is shifting adoption patterns across plant upgrades and mobile inspection fleets. Moreover, real time radiography technologies are being paired with remote control and augmented visualization tools to reduce exposure risks and speed decision cycles, and film-based systems continue to serve niche environments where established workflows or regulatory acceptance necessitate their use.
At the same time, supplier strategies are changing: manufacturers are expanding service portfolios and investing in detector innovation, while integrators are focusing on end-to-end inspection solutions that bundle imaging hardware with software for image management and analytic augmentation. These shifts are reinforced by workforce trends, where cross-disciplinary teams-combining inspection technicians, data analysts, and safety specialists-are redefining how inspections are planned and executed. As a result, customers are increasingly evaluating vendors on the basis of lifecycle support, training, and the ability to deliver repeatable, auditable inspection outcomes rather than on hardware specifications alone.
Cumulative implications of 2025 tariff changes on supply chain resilience, procurement strategies, and total cost of ownership for industrial radiography equipment
The introduction of new tariff measures in 2025 has had a cumulative impact on procurement, supply chain strategies, and total cost of ownership for radiography equipment. Increased duties have elevated landed costs for certain imported subsystems and consumables, prompting buyers to re-evaluate vendor selection criteria and inventory policies. In response, some end users have shifted toward longer procurement lead times, expanded spare parts inventories, and multi-sourcing strategies to mitigate single-vendor exposure. These adjustments have, in turn, influenced capital planning cycles, with organizations prioritizing investments that offer higher utilization rates and lower operating costs over shorter-term price savings.
Simultaneously, the tariff environment has accelerated conversations around nearshoring and local assembly for certain complex detector components and mechanical assemblies. Suppliers with regional manufacturing footprints have seen relative procurement interest as buyers weigh the trade-offs between vendor proximity and performance credentials. Regulatory compliance and customs administration have also gained prominence in procurement dialogues; buyers are demanding clearer country-of-origin documentation and more transparent cost structures. Finally, the policy environment has nudged some customers to reconsider technology mixes, for example balancing investments in X-ray-based digital systems against isotope-based sources, to align with logistics simplicity and long-term operational resilience.
Integrated segmentation insights explaining how technology modalities, product families, applications, and source types interact to shape procurement and deployment decisions
Segmentation insights reveal how different technology pathways, product families, application needs, and source types create distinct value propositions and deployment patterns in industrial radiography. Based on Technology, the market encompasses computed radiography which relies on imaging plates and laser scanners, digital radiography encompassing flat panel detectors, line scan detectors, and portable systems, film radiography that continues to rely on darkroom systems and film cameras, and real time radiography available as flat panel detector systems and intensifier-based systems; these technology choices determine image throughput, onsite processing demands, and ergonomics for field teams. Based on Product Type, the landscape includes computed tomography with macro CT and micro CT variants, mobile radiography covering portable units and remote controlled units, and stationary radiography involving cabinet systems and stations; these product distinctions influence where and how inspections can be performed, from laboratory-level non-destructive evaluation to in-situ field diagnostics.
Based on Application, use cases span casting inspection with die casting and sand casting subtypes, concrete inspection featuring reinforced and structural concrete modalities, pipeline inspection divided between girth weld and seam weld inspection, and weld inspection covering butt welds, fillet welds, and spot welds; the diversity of applications drives specific detector selection, energy settings, and imaging protocols. Based on Source Type, options include radioactive sources such as cobalt-60 and iridium-192 and X-ray sources segmented into high energy and low energy X-ray; source selection shapes regulatory obligations, logistics complexity, and safety procedures. Together, these overlapping segmentation dimensions inform procurement trade-offs: a choice of portable flat panel detectors paired with remote-controlled mobile units will serve pipeline girth weld inspection differently than a stationary cabinet micro CT chosen for laboratory casting analysis, and this interplay guides investment priorities and service models.
How regional regulatory regimes, industrial concentrations, and service network depth collectively shape equipment adoption, compliance approaches, and procurement priorities
Regional dynamics are characterized by differentiated regulatory regimes, infrastructure maturity, and industrial end-market concentrations. In the Americas, inspection demand is frequently driven by energy, petrochemical, and heavy manufacturing sectors that require robust mobile capabilities and aftermarket support; the region’s procurement emphasis often leans toward portable digital systems and service contracts that reduce downtime. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization in some national markets contrasts with complex cross-border logistics in others, making regulatory documentation, source handling protocols, and vendor networks decisive factors for buyers. The region’s inspection landscape balances legacy film acceptance in specific jurisdictions with growing adoption of digital radiography and integrated data management platforms.
Asia-Pacific presents a heterogeneous mix of rapid industrial expansion, extensive infrastructure projects, and varying regulatory capacities. In these markets, mobile radiography and scalable digital systems are frequently prioritized to support large-scale construction, pipeline development, and manufacturing growth. Across all regions, transitions are evident: investment is shifting toward solutions that reduce onsite personnel exposure, support remote analysis, and integrate smoothly into enterprise asset management systems. As a result, regional procurement strategies increasingly factor in local service availability, training capabilities, and the ability of vendors to support compliance and customs documentation for radioactive sources or regulated equipment.
Competitive company-level dynamics driven by integrated solution offerings, after-sales service depth, and partnerships bridging hardware with analytics
Competitive dynamics among companies supplying industrial radiography equipment are defined by differentiated technology portfolios, aftermarket services, and the ability to deliver integrated inspection solutions. Leading suppliers compete on detector performance, device ruggedization, software ecosystems, and the availability of turnkey inspection packages that include training and predictive maintenance services. Strategic partnerships between imaging hardware manufacturers and software analytics providers are becoming more common as customers demand seamless workflows from image capture through analysis and archival. Consequently, firms that offer robust warranty terms, rapid calibration services, and local field support tend to secure longer-term contracts with enterprise customers.
Further, firms that invest in regulatory compliance support, operator certification programs, and logistics for regulated sources gain a competitive edge in environments with complex customs and handling requirements. Consolidation activity and strategic alliances are evident where companies seek to extend their geographic reach or augment technological capabilities, with acquisitions frequently aimed at expanding digital offerings or service networks. Finally, value-based differentiation-such as bundled training, remote diagnostics, and lifecycle management plans-has become a critical factor in vendor selection, shifting negotiations away from transactional pricing toward total cost and risk reduction conversations.
A practical set of strategic actions industry leaders can adopt to enhance resilience, optimize procurement, and accelerate safe digital transformation in inspection programs
Industry leaders should pursue a set of actionable measures to strengthen resilience, optimize procurement, and accelerate safe digital adoption. First, prioritize investments in detector and software interoperability to enable phased upgrades and to reduce vendor lock-in for long-term inspection programs. By ensuring compatibility between computed radiography imaging plates, digital flat panel detectors, and image management platforms, organizations preserve flexibility while improving workflow efficiency. Second, develop regional supply chain contingency plans that account for tariff-driven cost shifts, customs requirements, and component lead times; diversification of suppliers and local assembly partnerships can reduce exposure to sudden policy changes.
Third, expand competency development through structured operator certification and remote-support frameworks to maximize equipment uptime and adherence to safety protocols. Fourth, evaluate technology mixes pragmatically: align high-energy sources and intensifier-based real time radiography with applications that justify their logistics and safety overhead, while leveraging portable digital detectors and micro CT solutions for rapid, high-throughput inspection needs. Fifth, negotiate service-level agreements that include preventive calibration, rapid field deployment capabilities, and data management support to safeguard inspection continuity and evidence traceability. Taking these steps will help organizations balance short-term operational constraints with long-term strategic objectives for digital transformation and asset integrity.
A transparent mixed-methods research methodology combining stakeholder interviews, technical product analysis, and regulatory review to ensure practical and defensible insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines primary engagement with industry stakeholders, rigorous technical review of product architectures, and synthesis of publicly available regulatory guidance to build a defensible evidence base. Primary inputs included structured interviews with inspection engineers, procurement leaders, and vendor product managers to capture real-world deployment constraints, technology performance trade-offs, and service expectations. These qualitative insights were triangulated with technical product specifications and operator manuals to ensure accurate representation of detector capabilities, source handling requirements, and equipment interoperability considerations.
Supplementing primary research, a systematic review of regulatory frameworks and standards informed the discussion on source handling, certification, and compliance-related procurement drivers. Where applicable, case examples and real-world deployment scenarios were analyzed to translate technical differences into practical implications for inspection planning and lifecycle management. Throughout the process, care was taken to ensure that conclusions reflect observable trends and stakeholder perspectives rather than speculative projections, and that methodology choices are transparent to allow readers to gauge the applicability of insights to their operational context.
A concise synthesis of strategic imperatives emphasizing technology alignment, service continuity, and procurement resilience to drive better inspection outcomes
The conclusion synthesizes the strategic implications for practitioners charged with maintaining structural integrity, ensuring safety, and optimizing inspection programs. Across technology pathways, the trend is toward digitalization, portability, and service-centric supplier models that prioritize lifecycle outcomes over one-off transactions. Procurement strategies must therefore balance detector performance with interoperability, service coverage, and regulatory support. Regulatory shifts and tariff policies have elevated the importance of supply chain resilience and documentation, prompting organizations to adopt multi-sourcing and closer vendor collaboration to mitigate operational risk.
Ultimately, successful adoption of modern radiography capabilities will hinge on three interdependent elements: thoughtful technology selection aligned to specific applications, robust service and training arrangements to protect uptime and safety, and strategic procurement tactics that incorporate regional constraints and long-term lifecycle costs. By integrating these considerations into inspection program design, operators can enhance defect detection, reduce exposure risks, and improve decision-making cadence-delivering measurable improvements in asset reliability and operational assurance.
A strategic introduction framing industrial radiography as an indispensable capability for asset integrity, quality assurance, and modern inspection ecosystems
Industrial radiography remains pivotal to ensuring structural integrity, process safety, and regulatory compliance across heavy industries. This introduction situates the technology suite within contemporary inspection programs, describing how radiographic modalities intersect with lifecycle management, non-destructive testing protocols, and the evolving demands of asset operators. The narrative emphasizes that radiography is not merely a detection tool but a strategic capability that underpins operational continuity, enabling early defect detection, quality assurance during manufacture, and evidence-based maintenance decision-making.
Transitioning from legacy practices to more integrated diagnostic ecosystems, stakeholders increasingly view radiographic technology as a component of broader digital inspection strategies that include data management, analytics, and remote collaboration. Consequently, procurement decisions are influenced by considerations beyond raw imaging performance: ease of deployment in constrained environments, compatibility with digital records, personnel safety, and vendor service networks. This introduction clarifies the scope of technologies and product classes covered in the analysis, framing subsequent sections so readers can relate high-level trends to concrete operational use cases and procurement priorities.
How converging detector innovations, service-centric supplier strategies, and workforce digitization are reshaping the industrial radiography landscape for inspection leaders
The landscape of industrial radiography is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology convergence, regulatory emphasis on safety, and the digitalization of inspection workflows. Digital radiography is advancing into more portable and ruggedized form factors while computed radiography retains relevance where retrofit and cost constraints apply, which is shifting adoption patterns across plant upgrades and mobile inspection fleets. Moreover, real time radiography technologies are being paired with remote control and augmented visualization tools to reduce exposure risks and speed decision cycles, and film-based systems continue to serve niche environments where established workflows or regulatory acceptance necessitate their use.
At the same time, supplier strategies are changing: manufacturers are expanding service portfolios and investing in detector innovation, while integrators are focusing on end-to-end inspection solutions that bundle imaging hardware with software for image management and analytic augmentation. These shifts are reinforced by workforce trends, where cross-disciplinary teams-combining inspection technicians, data analysts, and safety specialists-are redefining how inspections are planned and executed. As a result, customers are increasingly evaluating vendors on the basis of lifecycle support, training, and the ability to deliver repeatable, auditable inspection outcomes rather than on hardware specifications alone.
Cumulative implications of 2025 tariff changes on supply chain resilience, procurement strategies, and total cost of ownership for industrial radiography equipment
The introduction of new tariff measures in 2025 has had a cumulative impact on procurement, supply chain strategies, and total cost of ownership for radiography equipment. Increased duties have elevated landed costs for certain imported subsystems and consumables, prompting buyers to re-evaluate vendor selection criteria and inventory policies. In response, some end users have shifted toward longer procurement lead times, expanded spare parts inventories, and multi-sourcing strategies to mitigate single-vendor exposure. These adjustments have, in turn, influenced capital planning cycles, with organizations prioritizing investments that offer higher utilization rates and lower operating costs over shorter-term price savings.
Simultaneously, the tariff environment has accelerated conversations around nearshoring and local assembly for certain complex detector components and mechanical assemblies. Suppliers with regional manufacturing footprints have seen relative procurement interest as buyers weigh the trade-offs between vendor proximity and performance credentials. Regulatory compliance and customs administration have also gained prominence in procurement dialogues; buyers are demanding clearer country-of-origin documentation and more transparent cost structures. Finally, the policy environment has nudged some customers to reconsider technology mixes, for example balancing investments in X-ray-based digital systems against isotope-based sources, to align with logistics simplicity and long-term operational resilience.
Integrated segmentation insights explaining how technology modalities, product families, applications, and source types interact to shape procurement and deployment decisions
Segmentation insights reveal how different technology pathways, product families, application needs, and source types create distinct value propositions and deployment patterns in industrial radiography. Based on Technology, the market encompasses computed radiography which relies on imaging plates and laser scanners, digital radiography encompassing flat panel detectors, line scan detectors, and portable systems, film radiography that continues to rely on darkroom systems and film cameras, and real time radiography available as flat panel detector systems and intensifier-based systems; these technology choices determine image throughput, onsite processing demands, and ergonomics for field teams. Based on Product Type, the landscape includes computed tomography with macro CT and micro CT variants, mobile radiography covering portable units and remote controlled units, and stationary radiography involving cabinet systems and stations; these product distinctions influence where and how inspections can be performed, from laboratory-level non-destructive evaluation to in-situ field diagnostics.
Based on Application, use cases span casting inspection with die casting and sand casting subtypes, concrete inspection featuring reinforced and structural concrete modalities, pipeline inspection divided between girth weld and seam weld inspection, and weld inspection covering butt welds, fillet welds, and spot welds; the diversity of applications drives specific detector selection, energy settings, and imaging protocols. Based on Source Type, options include radioactive sources such as cobalt-60 and iridium-192 and X-ray sources segmented into high energy and low energy X-ray; source selection shapes regulatory obligations, logistics complexity, and safety procedures. Together, these overlapping segmentation dimensions inform procurement trade-offs: a choice of portable flat panel detectors paired with remote-controlled mobile units will serve pipeline girth weld inspection differently than a stationary cabinet micro CT chosen for laboratory casting analysis, and this interplay guides investment priorities and service models.
How regional regulatory regimes, industrial concentrations, and service network depth collectively shape equipment adoption, compliance approaches, and procurement priorities
Regional dynamics are characterized by differentiated regulatory regimes, infrastructure maturity, and industrial end-market concentrations. In the Americas, inspection demand is frequently driven by energy, petrochemical, and heavy manufacturing sectors that require robust mobile capabilities and aftermarket support; the region’s procurement emphasis often leans toward portable digital systems and service contracts that reduce downtime. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization in some national markets contrasts with complex cross-border logistics in others, making regulatory documentation, source handling protocols, and vendor networks decisive factors for buyers. The region’s inspection landscape balances legacy film acceptance in specific jurisdictions with growing adoption of digital radiography and integrated data management platforms.
Asia-Pacific presents a heterogeneous mix of rapid industrial expansion, extensive infrastructure projects, and varying regulatory capacities. In these markets, mobile radiography and scalable digital systems are frequently prioritized to support large-scale construction, pipeline development, and manufacturing growth. Across all regions, transitions are evident: investment is shifting toward solutions that reduce onsite personnel exposure, support remote analysis, and integrate smoothly into enterprise asset management systems. As a result, regional procurement strategies increasingly factor in local service availability, training capabilities, and the ability of vendors to support compliance and customs documentation for radioactive sources or regulated equipment.
Competitive company-level dynamics driven by integrated solution offerings, after-sales service depth, and partnerships bridging hardware with analytics
Competitive dynamics among companies supplying industrial radiography equipment are defined by differentiated technology portfolios, aftermarket services, and the ability to deliver integrated inspection solutions. Leading suppliers compete on detector performance, device ruggedization, software ecosystems, and the availability of turnkey inspection packages that include training and predictive maintenance services. Strategic partnerships between imaging hardware manufacturers and software analytics providers are becoming more common as customers demand seamless workflows from image capture through analysis and archival. Consequently, firms that offer robust warranty terms, rapid calibration services, and local field support tend to secure longer-term contracts with enterprise customers.
Further, firms that invest in regulatory compliance support, operator certification programs, and logistics for regulated sources gain a competitive edge in environments with complex customs and handling requirements. Consolidation activity and strategic alliances are evident where companies seek to extend their geographic reach or augment technological capabilities, with acquisitions frequently aimed at expanding digital offerings or service networks. Finally, value-based differentiation-such as bundled training, remote diagnostics, and lifecycle management plans-has become a critical factor in vendor selection, shifting negotiations away from transactional pricing toward total cost and risk reduction conversations.
A practical set of strategic actions industry leaders can adopt to enhance resilience, optimize procurement, and accelerate safe digital transformation in inspection programs
Industry leaders should pursue a set of actionable measures to strengthen resilience, optimize procurement, and accelerate safe digital adoption. First, prioritize investments in detector and software interoperability to enable phased upgrades and to reduce vendor lock-in for long-term inspection programs. By ensuring compatibility between computed radiography imaging plates, digital flat panel detectors, and image management platforms, organizations preserve flexibility while improving workflow efficiency. Second, develop regional supply chain contingency plans that account for tariff-driven cost shifts, customs requirements, and component lead times; diversification of suppliers and local assembly partnerships can reduce exposure to sudden policy changes.
Third, expand competency development through structured operator certification and remote-support frameworks to maximize equipment uptime and adherence to safety protocols. Fourth, evaluate technology mixes pragmatically: align high-energy sources and intensifier-based real time radiography with applications that justify their logistics and safety overhead, while leveraging portable digital detectors and micro CT solutions for rapid, high-throughput inspection needs. Fifth, negotiate service-level agreements that include preventive calibration, rapid field deployment capabilities, and data management support to safeguard inspection continuity and evidence traceability. Taking these steps will help organizations balance short-term operational constraints with long-term strategic objectives for digital transformation and asset integrity.
A transparent mixed-methods research methodology combining stakeholder interviews, technical product analysis, and regulatory review to ensure practical and defensible insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines primary engagement with industry stakeholders, rigorous technical review of product architectures, and synthesis of publicly available regulatory guidance to build a defensible evidence base. Primary inputs included structured interviews with inspection engineers, procurement leaders, and vendor product managers to capture real-world deployment constraints, technology performance trade-offs, and service expectations. These qualitative insights were triangulated with technical product specifications and operator manuals to ensure accurate representation of detector capabilities, source handling requirements, and equipment interoperability considerations.
Supplementing primary research, a systematic review of regulatory frameworks and standards informed the discussion on source handling, certification, and compliance-related procurement drivers. Where applicable, case examples and real-world deployment scenarios were analyzed to translate technical differences into practical implications for inspection planning and lifecycle management. Throughout the process, care was taken to ensure that conclusions reflect observable trends and stakeholder perspectives rather than speculative projections, and that methodology choices are transparent to allow readers to gauge the applicability of insights to their operational context.
A concise synthesis of strategic imperatives emphasizing technology alignment, service continuity, and procurement resilience to drive better inspection outcomes
The conclusion synthesizes the strategic implications for practitioners charged with maintaining structural integrity, ensuring safety, and optimizing inspection programs. Across technology pathways, the trend is toward digitalization, portability, and service-centric supplier models that prioritize lifecycle outcomes over one-off transactions. Procurement strategies must therefore balance detector performance with interoperability, service coverage, and regulatory support. Regulatory shifts and tariff policies have elevated the importance of supply chain resilience and documentation, prompting organizations to adopt multi-sourcing and closer vendor collaboration to mitigate operational risk.
Ultimately, successful adoption of modern radiography capabilities will hinge on three interdependent elements: thoughtful technology selection aligned to specific applications, robust service and training arrangements to protect uptime and safety, and strategic procurement tactics that incorporate regional constraints and long-term lifecycle costs. By integrating these considerations into inspection program design, operators can enhance defect detection, reduce exposure risks, and improve decision-making cadence-delivering measurable improvements in asset reliability and operational assurance.
Table of Contents
194 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Industrial Radiography Equipment Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. X-ray Radiography Systems
- 8.1.2. Gamma Radiography Systems
- 8.1.3. Accessories & Components
- 8.1.3.1. Collimators
- 8.1.3.2. Shielding Enclosures
- 8.1.3.3. Positioning Devices & Manipulators
- 8.2. Software
- 8.2.1. Acquisition & Control Software
- 8.2.2. Image Processing & Analysis Software
- 8.2.3. Data Management & Archiving Software
- 8.3. Services
- 8.3.1. Installation & Commissioning
- 8.3.2. Calibration & Maintenance
- 8.3.3. Training & Certification
- 8.3.4. Rental & Leasing
- 9. Industrial Radiography Equipment Market, by Imaging Technology
- 9.1. Film-based Radiography
- 9.2. Digital Radiography
- 9.2.1. Computed Radiography (CR)
- 9.2.2. Direct Digital Radiography (DDR)
- 9.2.3. Computed Tomography (CT)
- 9.3. Real-time Radiography
- 9.4. Hybrid System
- 10. Industrial Radiography Equipment Market, by Source Type
- 10.1. X-ray Tube
- 10.1.1. Constant Potential Tube
- 10.1.2. Pulsed Tube
- 10.1.3. Microfocus Tube
- 10.2. Gamma Isotope
- 10.2.1. Iridium-192
- 10.2.2. Cobalt-60
- 10.2.3. Selenium-75
- 10.2.4. Ytterbium-169
- 11. Industrial Radiography Equipment Market, by Mobility
- 11.1. Stationary System
- 11.2. Portable System
- 12. Industrial Radiography Equipment Market, by Application
- 12.1. Casting Inspection
- 12.1.1. Die Casting
- 12.1.2. Sand Casting
- 12.2. Concrete Inspection
- 12.2.1. Reinforced Concrete
- 12.2.2. Structural Concrete
- 12.3. Pipeline Inspection
- 12.3.1. Girth Weld Inspection
- 12.3.2. Seam Weld Inspection
- 12.4. Weld Inspection
- 12.4.1. Butt Welds
- 12.4.2. Fillet Welds
- 12.4.3. Spot Welds
- 13. Industrial Radiography Equipment Market, by End-use Industry
- 13.1. Oil & Gas
- 13.1.1. Upstream
- 13.1.2. Midstream
- 13.1.3. Downstream
- 13.2. Power Generation
- 13.2.1. Nuclear Power
- 13.2.2. Fossil Fuel Power
- 13.2.3. Renewable Energy
- 13.3. Aerospace & Defense
- 13.4. Automotive & Transportation
- 13.5. Manufacturing & Heavy Engineering
- 13.6. Chemical
- 13.7. Infrastructure & Construction
- 13.8. Electronics & Semiconductor
- 14. Industrial Radiography Equipment Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Industrial Radiography Equipment Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Industrial Radiography Equipment Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. United States Industrial Radiography Equipment Market
- 18. China Industrial Radiography Equipment Market
- 19. Competitive Landscape
- 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 19.5. 3DX-Ray Ltd. by Image Scan Holdings plc.
- 19.6. Anritsu Corporation
- 19.7. Baker Hughes Company
- 19.8. Blue Star Limited
- 19.9. Bolax NDT Engineering
- 19.10. Carestream Health, Inc.
- 19.11. Comet Holding AG
- 19.12. DÜRR NDT GmbH & Co. KG
- 19.13. Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
- 19.14. GE Company
- 19.15. Golden Engineering Inc.
- 19.16. Hamamatsu Photonics, K. K.
- 19.17. Matsusada Precision Inc.
- 19.18. Metrix NDT Ltd.
- 19.19. Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
- 19.20. Minebea Intec GmbH
- 19.21. Nikon Corporation
- 19.22. Nordson Corporation
- 19.23. North Star Imaging, Inc. by Illinois Tool Works Inc.
- 19.24. PerkinElmer Inc.
- 19.25. Pexray Oy
- 19.26. Precision X-Ray Inc.
- 19.27. Seamark ZM Technology Co., Ltd.
- 19.28. Shimadzu Corporation
- 19.29. Smiths Group PLC
- 19.30. Source Production & Equipment Co., Inc.
- 19.31. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
- 19.32. Vision Medicaid Equipments Pvt., Ltd.
- FIGURE 1. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 2. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
- FIGURE 3. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
- FIGURE 4. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 5. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY IMAGING TECHNOLOGY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 6. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY SOURCE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 7. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY MOBILITY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 8. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 9. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 10. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 11. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 12. GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 13. UNITED STATES INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 14. CHINA INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
