Industrial IoT Gateway Market by Deployment Type (Cloud, On-Premises), Connectivity (Wired, Wireless), Industry Vertical, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Industrial IoT Gateway Market was valued at USD 427.49 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 450.34 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.33%, reaching USD 647.76 billion by 2032.
Framing the strategic role of industrial IoT gateways as intelligent edge enablers that reconcile legacy operations with modern data-driven enterprise initiatives
Industrial organizations are increasingly reliant on robust edge-to-cloud architectures, and industrial IoT gateways play a pivotal role in bridging legacy equipment with modern digital platforms. As enterprises prioritize resiliency, interoperability, and actionable edge analytics, gateways have evolved from simple protocol converters into intelligent nodes that manage security, data normalization, and local decision-making. This shift is driven by the need to extract timely operational insights while minimizing latency and preserving bandwidth.
Gateway technology intersects with trends in edge computing, distributed security frameworks, and universal connectivity, making it a focal point for both IT and OT stakeholders. Early adopters are using gateways to reduce unplanned downtime, enhance asset visibility, and enable new service models that monetize instrumented assets. Meanwhile, concerns around cyber risk and lifecycle support have elevated the importance of vendor roadmaps and long-term firmware support commitments.
In response, procurement and engineering teams are adopting structured evaluation methodologies that consider protocol breadth, edge compute capabilities, and integration tooling alongside traditional hardware durability metrics. Consequently, the gateway selection process is becoming multidisciplinary, requiring alignment across operations, cybersecurity, and cloud teams to ensure deployments deliver measurable outcomes and sustain over time.
How converging forces in digitalization, procurement evolution, and interoperability demands are redefining gateway roles and procurement strategies for industrial enterprises
The industrial landscape is undergoing transformative shifts as digitalization, regulatory pressures, and supply chain realignments converge to reshape priorities for edge infrastructure. Increasingly, organizations are shifting from siloed pilot projects toward integrated, enterprise-wide deployments where gateways must support heterogeneous device fleets and evolving protocol standards. This transition amplifies the need for gateways that offer modularity, secure boot and update mechanisms, and flexible compute fabrics to host analytics workloads closer to assets.
Concurrently, the industry is witnessing a recalibration of procurement strategies toward lifecycle services and subscription models, creating incentives for vendors to deliver continuous feature enhancements and managed update channels. This change is pushing companies to reconsider ownership models for edge infrastructure and to design architectures that reduce operational friction during upgrades and maintenance.
Finally, interoperability frameworks and edge orchestration platforms are gaining prominence as enterprises seek deterministic behavior and consistent security postures across distributed environments. These forces collectively transform the role of the gateway from a passive connector to an active participant in edge-enabled service delivery, influencing technology roadmaps and vendor engagement models across the ecosystem.
Implications of recent tariff shifts on hardware sourcing, supply chain resilience, and procurement strategies that influence gateway selection and deployment timing
Tariff policy changes can materially affect hardware cost structures, procurement timing, and vendor selection strategies for industrial IoT gateway deployments. Recent tariff adjustments in the United States have prompted many organizations to revisit supply chain configurations, consider alternative sourcing geographies, and re-evaluate total cost of ownership when selecting gateway hardware. These shifts have elevated the importance of flexible procurement options and diversified supplier portfolios, as buyers seek to mitigate geopolitical and trade-related exposure.
In practice, procurement teams are responding by emphasizing modular designs that allow critical components to be sourced from multiple suppliers, and by prioritizing vendors with diversified manufacturing footprints. This is coupled with an increased appetite for software-defined differentiation, where functionality can be delivered through firmware and cloud services to offset hardware margin pressure. Consequently, procurement cycles are extending as buyers perform deeper due diligence on supplier resilience and contractual protections.
Moreover, engineering teams are collaborating more closely with supply chain and legal counterparts to ensure component traceability, qualification pathways, and contingency plans for localized production or assembly. As a result, tariff dynamics are catalyzing a broader emphasis on supply chain transparency and supplier risk management within gateway procurement programs.
Segment-driven gateway differentiation across industry verticals, deployment choices, connectivity options, and application-specific functional priorities
Segmentation analysis illuminates how industry-specific demands, deployment preferences, connectivity modalities, and application priorities shape gateway requirements and buyer decision criteria. Based on industry vertical, gateway needs diverge across Energy & Utilities, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Retail, and Transportation & Logistics where compliance, uptime, and environment-specific ruggedization drive different form factors and certification requirements. For example, utilities and transportation often prioritize hardened enclosures and extended lifecycle support, while healthcare and retail emphasize data privacy and integration with clinical or point-of-sale systems.
Based on deployment type, buyers must weigh trade-offs between Cloud and On-Premises architectures; Cloud deployments, including Private Cloud and Public Cloud options, offer rapid scalability and centralized orchestration, whereas on-premises installations provide tighter control over latency and data residency. The choice informs the gateway’s software stack, update cadence, and monitoring approaches.
Based on connectivity, the technical demands vary between Wired and Wireless implementations; wireless modalities such as Bluetooth, Cellular, and Wi-Fi introduce divergent considerations for power management, roaming behavior, and network security policies, whereas wired connections often prioritize deterministic throughput and industrial protocol compatibility. Accordingly, product teams are designing gateways with flexible I/O and multi-protocol radios.
Based on application, gateways are tailored to support use cases such as Asset Tracking, Building Automation, Fleet Management, Predictive Maintenance, and Smart Grid operations. Asset Tracking itself branches into Condition Monitoring and Real-Time Tracking, which require different sampling rates, local filtering, and alerting semantics. These segmentation lenses guide product roadmaps, integration toolkits, and professional services offerings that align with buyer outcomes.
Regional adoption patterns and regulatory realities shaping gateway procurement preferences across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific economic zones
Regional dynamics materially influence procurement behavior, regulatory compliance, and technology adoption velocity for industrial IoT gateways. In the Americas, buyers often prioritize rapid innovation cycles, tight integration with cloud hyperscalers, and flexible commercial models that support as-a-service deployments. This region’s regulatory frameworks and enterprise cloud affinity shape expectations for data interoperability and vendor-managed services.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a complex regulatory and standards landscape where privacy, cross-border data flow restrictions, and industry-specific certifications can dictate architectural choices. Here, enterprises place elevated emphasis on local certification, energy efficiency, and solutions that align with regional sustainability mandates and infrastructure modernization agendas.
Asia-Pacific exhibits diverse adoption patterns driven by varied industrial modernization priorities and a mix of large-scale manufacturing and urbanization initiatives. Buyers in this region often seek cost-effective, scalable solutions with strong local support and multilingual documentation. Additionally, manufacturing hubs in Asia-Pacific tend to prioritize rugged designs and broad protocol compatibility to integrate legacy assets into Industry 4.0 initiatives.
Collectively, regional realities demand vendor strategies that combine global platform consistency with localized support, compliance services, and adaptable commercial offerings to meet varied buyer expectations across geography.
How vendor differentiation is driven by modular hardware, integrated security, cloud partnerships, and lifecycle services that reduce deployment friction
Competitive dynamics among gateway vendors are influenced by product breadth, integration ecosystems, and the ability to deliver end-to-end services that reduce deployment friction. Leading suppliers differentiate by offering modular hardware platforms with rich protocol stacks, integrated security frameworks, and developer-facing SDKs that accelerate application development. Strategic partnerships and certification programs with cloud providers, systems integrators, and device manufacturers strengthen vendor propositions by ensuring smoother end-to-end integrations.
In addition, companies that provide strong lifecycle services-including secure update channels, remote diagnostics, and field replaceable units-tend to gain trust from industrial buyers who require predictable long-term support. Open APIs and interoperability certifications contribute to ecosystem stickiness, enabling third-party analytics and vertical-specific solutions to be layered on top of gateway platforms. Vendors that invest in professional services, training, and local support networks can reduce time-to-value for customers and expand their addressable opportunities within complex operations.
Finally, innovation around edge-native analytics, hardware security modules, and integrated connectivity management is creating new differentiation vectors. As a result, competitive positioning increasingly balances hardware engineering excellence with cloud partnerships, software monetization strategies, and service delivery capabilities that together form a compelling total solution.
Actionable steps for executives to align gateway selection with business outcomes, cross-functional governance, secure lifecycle practices, and resilient sourcing strategies
Leaders should adopt a pragmatic, outcome-oriented approach to gateway strategy that balances technical rigor with operational pragmatism. Begin by aligning gateway requirements to clearly defined business outcomes such as reduced downtime, improved asset utilization, or new subscription revenue streams. This alignment ensures procurement decisions prioritize features that deliver measurable returns rather than chasing one-off capabilities.
Next, institute cross-functional evaluation teams that bring together operations, IT, cybersecurity, and procurement to assess vendor fit across technical, contractual, and support dimensions. Such governance reduces integration surprises and strengthens accountability for lifecycle management. Simultaneously, require demonstrable support for secure over-the-air updates and documented vulnerability management processes to safeguard distributed edge assets.
From a sourcing perspective, diversify suppliers and specify modularity so components can be swapped to mitigate supply chain disruption. Embrace architectures that decouple edge compute from cloud backends to provide flexibility across hybrid deployments. Finally, invest in pilot programs that validate end-to-end workflows and incorporate learnings into scale-up plans, thereby reducing operational risk and expediting value realization.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach integrating technical assessment, practitioner interviews, and documented case study validation to ensure reliable guidance
This research leverages a multi-dimensional methodology combining technology landscape assessment, vendor capability analysis, and primary engagement with industry practitioners to ensure comprehensive and current insights. The approach begins with a systematic review of product portfolios, technical whitepapers, and interoperability certifications to map functional capabilities and integration touchpoints. This is complemented by hands-on validation of feature sets and security controls where possible to ensure alignment with industrial requirements.
Primary inputs include structured interviews with engineering leaders, operations managers, and procurement specialists who provide context on deployment priorities, interoperability challenges, and service expectations. Secondary inputs draw from public technical documentation, regulatory guidance, and case studies that illustrate real-world implementations. Cross-referencing these sources allows for triangulation of claims and helps to uncover patterns in buyer preferences and vendor performance.
Finally, findings are synthesized into pragmatic guidance that emphasizes architectural trade-offs, procurement considerations, and implementation best practices. Throughout, transparency in assumptions and a focus on reproducible evaluation criteria aim to support sound decision-making for organizations planning gateway deployments.
Synthesis of gateway imperatives highlighting the need for interoperable architectures, secure lifecycle practices, and outcome-driven deployment governance
Industrial IoT gateways are a strategic inflection point for enterprises pursuing digital transformation, enabling tangible operational improvements while introducing new considerations for security, supply chain, and lifecycle management. As edge intelligence becomes more distributed, successful implementations will hinge on clear alignment between business objectives and technical requirements, supported by cross-functional governance and robust vendor due diligence.
Looking ahead, enterprises that build flexible, interoperable architectures and prioritize secure lifecycle management will be best positioned to capture the productivity and service innovation benefits of gateway-enabled initiatives. The necessity for vendor transparency, modularity, and localized support will persist as organizations balance global platform advantages with regional compliance and service expectations.
In summary, gateways are no longer mere connectivity devices; they are strategic infrastructure that require disciplined evaluation, resilient sourcing strategies, and a focus on outcomes to unlock sustainable value across industrial operations.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the strategic role of industrial IoT gateways as intelligent edge enablers that reconcile legacy operations with modern data-driven enterprise initiatives
Industrial organizations are increasingly reliant on robust edge-to-cloud architectures, and industrial IoT gateways play a pivotal role in bridging legacy equipment with modern digital platforms. As enterprises prioritize resiliency, interoperability, and actionable edge analytics, gateways have evolved from simple protocol converters into intelligent nodes that manage security, data normalization, and local decision-making. This shift is driven by the need to extract timely operational insights while minimizing latency and preserving bandwidth.
Gateway technology intersects with trends in edge computing, distributed security frameworks, and universal connectivity, making it a focal point for both IT and OT stakeholders. Early adopters are using gateways to reduce unplanned downtime, enhance asset visibility, and enable new service models that monetize instrumented assets. Meanwhile, concerns around cyber risk and lifecycle support have elevated the importance of vendor roadmaps and long-term firmware support commitments.
In response, procurement and engineering teams are adopting structured evaluation methodologies that consider protocol breadth, edge compute capabilities, and integration tooling alongside traditional hardware durability metrics. Consequently, the gateway selection process is becoming multidisciplinary, requiring alignment across operations, cybersecurity, and cloud teams to ensure deployments deliver measurable outcomes and sustain over time.
How converging forces in digitalization, procurement evolution, and interoperability demands are redefining gateway roles and procurement strategies for industrial enterprises
The industrial landscape is undergoing transformative shifts as digitalization, regulatory pressures, and supply chain realignments converge to reshape priorities for edge infrastructure. Increasingly, organizations are shifting from siloed pilot projects toward integrated, enterprise-wide deployments where gateways must support heterogeneous device fleets and evolving protocol standards. This transition amplifies the need for gateways that offer modularity, secure boot and update mechanisms, and flexible compute fabrics to host analytics workloads closer to assets.
Concurrently, the industry is witnessing a recalibration of procurement strategies toward lifecycle services and subscription models, creating incentives for vendors to deliver continuous feature enhancements and managed update channels. This change is pushing companies to reconsider ownership models for edge infrastructure and to design architectures that reduce operational friction during upgrades and maintenance.
Finally, interoperability frameworks and edge orchestration platforms are gaining prominence as enterprises seek deterministic behavior and consistent security postures across distributed environments. These forces collectively transform the role of the gateway from a passive connector to an active participant in edge-enabled service delivery, influencing technology roadmaps and vendor engagement models across the ecosystem.
Implications of recent tariff shifts on hardware sourcing, supply chain resilience, and procurement strategies that influence gateway selection and deployment timing
Tariff policy changes can materially affect hardware cost structures, procurement timing, and vendor selection strategies for industrial IoT gateway deployments. Recent tariff adjustments in the United States have prompted many organizations to revisit supply chain configurations, consider alternative sourcing geographies, and re-evaluate total cost of ownership when selecting gateway hardware. These shifts have elevated the importance of flexible procurement options and diversified supplier portfolios, as buyers seek to mitigate geopolitical and trade-related exposure.
In practice, procurement teams are responding by emphasizing modular designs that allow critical components to be sourced from multiple suppliers, and by prioritizing vendors with diversified manufacturing footprints. This is coupled with an increased appetite for software-defined differentiation, where functionality can be delivered through firmware and cloud services to offset hardware margin pressure. Consequently, procurement cycles are extending as buyers perform deeper due diligence on supplier resilience and contractual protections.
Moreover, engineering teams are collaborating more closely with supply chain and legal counterparts to ensure component traceability, qualification pathways, and contingency plans for localized production or assembly. As a result, tariff dynamics are catalyzing a broader emphasis on supply chain transparency and supplier risk management within gateway procurement programs.
Segment-driven gateway differentiation across industry verticals, deployment choices, connectivity options, and application-specific functional priorities
Segmentation analysis illuminates how industry-specific demands, deployment preferences, connectivity modalities, and application priorities shape gateway requirements and buyer decision criteria. Based on industry vertical, gateway needs diverge across Energy & Utilities, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Retail, and Transportation & Logistics where compliance, uptime, and environment-specific ruggedization drive different form factors and certification requirements. For example, utilities and transportation often prioritize hardened enclosures and extended lifecycle support, while healthcare and retail emphasize data privacy and integration with clinical or point-of-sale systems.
Based on deployment type, buyers must weigh trade-offs between Cloud and On-Premises architectures; Cloud deployments, including Private Cloud and Public Cloud options, offer rapid scalability and centralized orchestration, whereas on-premises installations provide tighter control over latency and data residency. The choice informs the gateway’s software stack, update cadence, and monitoring approaches.
Based on connectivity, the technical demands vary between Wired and Wireless implementations; wireless modalities such as Bluetooth, Cellular, and Wi-Fi introduce divergent considerations for power management, roaming behavior, and network security policies, whereas wired connections often prioritize deterministic throughput and industrial protocol compatibility. Accordingly, product teams are designing gateways with flexible I/O and multi-protocol radios.
Based on application, gateways are tailored to support use cases such as Asset Tracking, Building Automation, Fleet Management, Predictive Maintenance, and Smart Grid operations. Asset Tracking itself branches into Condition Monitoring and Real-Time Tracking, which require different sampling rates, local filtering, and alerting semantics. These segmentation lenses guide product roadmaps, integration toolkits, and professional services offerings that align with buyer outcomes.
Regional adoption patterns and regulatory realities shaping gateway procurement preferences across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific economic zones
Regional dynamics materially influence procurement behavior, regulatory compliance, and technology adoption velocity for industrial IoT gateways. In the Americas, buyers often prioritize rapid innovation cycles, tight integration with cloud hyperscalers, and flexible commercial models that support as-a-service deployments. This region’s regulatory frameworks and enterprise cloud affinity shape expectations for data interoperability and vendor-managed services.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a complex regulatory and standards landscape where privacy, cross-border data flow restrictions, and industry-specific certifications can dictate architectural choices. Here, enterprises place elevated emphasis on local certification, energy efficiency, and solutions that align with regional sustainability mandates and infrastructure modernization agendas.
Asia-Pacific exhibits diverse adoption patterns driven by varied industrial modernization priorities and a mix of large-scale manufacturing and urbanization initiatives. Buyers in this region often seek cost-effective, scalable solutions with strong local support and multilingual documentation. Additionally, manufacturing hubs in Asia-Pacific tend to prioritize rugged designs and broad protocol compatibility to integrate legacy assets into Industry 4.0 initiatives.
Collectively, regional realities demand vendor strategies that combine global platform consistency with localized support, compliance services, and adaptable commercial offerings to meet varied buyer expectations across geography.
How vendor differentiation is driven by modular hardware, integrated security, cloud partnerships, and lifecycle services that reduce deployment friction
Competitive dynamics among gateway vendors are influenced by product breadth, integration ecosystems, and the ability to deliver end-to-end services that reduce deployment friction. Leading suppliers differentiate by offering modular hardware platforms with rich protocol stacks, integrated security frameworks, and developer-facing SDKs that accelerate application development. Strategic partnerships and certification programs with cloud providers, systems integrators, and device manufacturers strengthen vendor propositions by ensuring smoother end-to-end integrations.
In addition, companies that provide strong lifecycle services-including secure update channels, remote diagnostics, and field replaceable units-tend to gain trust from industrial buyers who require predictable long-term support. Open APIs and interoperability certifications contribute to ecosystem stickiness, enabling third-party analytics and vertical-specific solutions to be layered on top of gateway platforms. Vendors that invest in professional services, training, and local support networks can reduce time-to-value for customers and expand their addressable opportunities within complex operations.
Finally, innovation around edge-native analytics, hardware security modules, and integrated connectivity management is creating new differentiation vectors. As a result, competitive positioning increasingly balances hardware engineering excellence with cloud partnerships, software monetization strategies, and service delivery capabilities that together form a compelling total solution.
Actionable steps for executives to align gateway selection with business outcomes, cross-functional governance, secure lifecycle practices, and resilient sourcing strategies
Leaders should adopt a pragmatic, outcome-oriented approach to gateway strategy that balances technical rigor with operational pragmatism. Begin by aligning gateway requirements to clearly defined business outcomes such as reduced downtime, improved asset utilization, or new subscription revenue streams. This alignment ensures procurement decisions prioritize features that deliver measurable returns rather than chasing one-off capabilities.
Next, institute cross-functional evaluation teams that bring together operations, IT, cybersecurity, and procurement to assess vendor fit across technical, contractual, and support dimensions. Such governance reduces integration surprises and strengthens accountability for lifecycle management. Simultaneously, require demonstrable support for secure over-the-air updates and documented vulnerability management processes to safeguard distributed edge assets.
From a sourcing perspective, diversify suppliers and specify modularity so components can be swapped to mitigate supply chain disruption. Embrace architectures that decouple edge compute from cloud backends to provide flexibility across hybrid deployments. Finally, invest in pilot programs that validate end-to-end workflows and incorporate learnings into scale-up plans, thereby reducing operational risk and expediting value realization.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach integrating technical assessment, practitioner interviews, and documented case study validation to ensure reliable guidance
This research leverages a multi-dimensional methodology combining technology landscape assessment, vendor capability analysis, and primary engagement with industry practitioners to ensure comprehensive and current insights. The approach begins with a systematic review of product portfolios, technical whitepapers, and interoperability certifications to map functional capabilities and integration touchpoints. This is complemented by hands-on validation of feature sets and security controls where possible to ensure alignment with industrial requirements.
Primary inputs include structured interviews with engineering leaders, operations managers, and procurement specialists who provide context on deployment priorities, interoperability challenges, and service expectations. Secondary inputs draw from public technical documentation, regulatory guidance, and case studies that illustrate real-world implementations. Cross-referencing these sources allows for triangulation of claims and helps to uncover patterns in buyer preferences and vendor performance.
Finally, findings are synthesized into pragmatic guidance that emphasizes architectural trade-offs, procurement considerations, and implementation best practices. Throughout, transparency in assumptions and a focus on reproducible evaluation criteria aim to support sound decision-making for organizations planning gateway deployments.
Synthesis of gateway imperatives highlighting the need for interoperable architectures, secure lifecycle practices, and outcome-driven deployment governance
Industrial IoT gateways are a strategic inflection point for enterprises pursuing digital transformation, enabling tangible operational improvements while introducing new considerations for security, supply chain, and lifecycle management. As edge intelligence becomes more distributed, successful implementations will hinge on clear alignment between business objectives and technical requirements, supported by cross-functional governance and robust vendor due diligence.
Looking ahead, enterprises that build flexible, interoperable architectures and prioritize secure lifecycle management will be best positioned to capture the productivity and service innovation benefits of gateway-enabled initiatives. The necessity for vendor transparency, modularity, and localized support will persist as organizations balance global platform advantages with regional compliance and service expectations.
In summary, gateways are no longer mere connectivity devices; they are strategic infrastructure that require disciplined evaluation, resilient sourcing strategies, and a focus on outcomes to unlock sustainable value across industrial operations.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
189 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-driven edge analytics capabilities within industrial IoT gateways for real-time decision making
- 5.2. Deployment of 5G network slicing in industrial gateways to ensure deterministic latency for critical applications
- 5.3. Implementation of zero-trust security frameworks and quantum-safe encryption in IoT gateway communications
- 5.4. Orchestration of hybrid cloud and edge environments through containerized microservices on IoT gateways
- 5.5. Adoption of open-source edge computing platforms for interoperability across multi-vendor industrial IoT deployments
- 5.6. Enabling predictive maintenance through machine learning model inference directly on industrial gateways at the edge
- 5.7. Support for low-power wide-area network protocols and smart energy management in remote gateway installations
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Industrial IoT Gateway Market, by Deployment Type
- 8.1. Cloud
- 8.1.1. Private Cloud
- 8.1.2. Public Cloud
- 8.2. On-Premises
- 9. Industrial IoT Gateway Market, by Connectivity
- 9.1. Wired
- 9.2. Wireless
- 9.2.1. Bluetooth
- 9.2.2. Cellular
- 9.2.3. Wi-Fi
- 10. Industrial IoT Gateway Market, by Industry Vertical
- 10.1. Energy & Utilities
- 10.2. Healthcare
- 10.3. Manufacturing
- 10.4. Retail
- 10.5. Transportation & Logistics
- 11. Industrial IoT Gateway Market, by Application
- 11.1. Asset Tracking
- 11.1.1. Condition Monitoring
- 11.1.2. Real-Time Tracking
- 11.2. Building Automation
- 11.3. Fleet Management
- 11.4. Predictive Maintenance
- 11.5. Smart Grid
- 12. Industrial IoT Gateway Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Industrial IoT Gateway Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Industrial IoT Gateway Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 15.3.2. Siemens AG
- 15.3.3. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
- 15.3.4. Advantech Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.5. Honeywell International Inc.
- 15.3.6. Moxa Inc.
- 15.3.7. Digi International Inc.
- 15.3.8. ADLINK Technology Inc.
- 15.3.9. Dell Technologies Inc.
- 15.3.10. Sierra Wireless, Inc.
- 15.3.11. Lantronix, Inc.
- 15.3.12. Eurotech S.p.A.
- 15.3.13. NEXCOM International Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.14. Aaeon Technology Inc.
- 15.3.15. Softing AG
- 15.3.16. Kontron AG
- 15.3.17. Beijer Electronics Group AB
- 15.3.18. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.19. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
