IO-Link Market by Product Type (Actuators, Analog Devices, RfId Devices), Installation Type (New Installation, Retrofit), Component Type, Communication Type, Application, End User Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The IO-Link Market was valued at USD 22.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 26.40 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 19.22%, reaching USD 90.23 billion by 2032.
Strategic introduction to IO-Link and how device-level digitalization unlocks commissioning, diagnostics, and operational visibility across production environments
IO-Link has become a cornerstone technology in modern industrial automation by enabling bidirectional, device-level communication that transcends traditional binary I/O architectures. As manufacturers pursue higher asset visibility and more deterministic control, IO-Link supports parameter transfer, diagnostic reporting, and device replacement workflows that materially reduce commissioning time. In addition to simplifying wiring and lowering installation complexity, IO-Link enables richer sensor and actuator data to flow into control and analytics layers, which in turn supports predictive maintenance, condition monitoring, and faster changeovers.
Transitioning from legacy hardwired systems toward IO-Link-enabled architectures is rarely an all-or-nothing decision. Rather, adoption typically follows a phased pattern beginning with high-value use cases such as quality-critical sensors on assembly lines or condition-monitored actuators in process-critical loops. Over time, integrators and OEMs extend IO-Link across cells and lines, integrating masters and device description tools into edge compute nodes and higher-level PLC/SCADA systems. This gradual progression preserves existing assets while layering digital capabilities, enabling manufacturers to optimize performance without wholesale replacement of installed equipment.
How digitalization, interoperable standards, hybrid communications, and retrofit-first strategies are reshaping the IO-Link ecosystem and procurement priorities
The IO-Link landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three converging forces: the march of industrial digitalization, the rise of interoperable ecosystem standards, and the increasing demand for deployment flexibility. Advances in seamless integration frameworks such as OPC-UA and edge computing are allowing IO-Link data to flow directly into analytics platforms, enabling faster root-cause analysis and context-rich alerts. Parallel to this, manufacturers are prioritizing retrofitability, favoring IO-Link devices and masters designed to fit within existing architectures and minimize downtime during upgrades.
Another major dynamic is the broadening of communication options. While wired IO-Link remains the backbone for deterministic, high-reliability applications, the emergence of IO-Link Wireless and hybrid solutions is expanding use cases into mobile, rotating, or difficult-to-cable zones. At the same time, suppliers are consolidating software capabilities-device management, lifecycle tools, and cloud connectors-so customers can manage device fleets centrally. Taken together, these shifts are reorienting decisions from simple unit replacement toward holistic system evolution, where interoperability, lifecycle services, and secure data flows are the primary procurement drivers.
Assessment of cumulative tariff influences through 2025 and how trade policy shifts are prompting supply chain localization, design modularity, and strategic sourcing adjustments
Trade policy shifts and tariff adjustments announced in recent cycles have prompted many industrial buyers and suppliers to reassess supply chain exposure and procurement strategies. The cumulative effect of tariffs introduced or revised through 2025 has been to increase landed costs for certain imported components and to accelerate supplier diversification efforts. In response, OEMs and system integrators are prioritizing local sourcing where feasible and emphasising designs that reduce dependence on tariff-sensitive subassemblies.
At the operational level, these trade-related pressures have reinforced the business case for solutions that extend asset life and simplify retrofits-approaches that reduce the frequency of full equipment replacement and mitigate exposure to fluctuating import duties. Meanwhile, manufacturers are placing greater emphasis on modular architectures that can accommodate component substitution without significant redesign. From a strategic perspective, tariff-led uncertainty is increasing the value of supplier relationships that include engineering support, stocking strategies, and regional manufacturing footprints, because these reduce lead-time volatility and allow faster response to changing demand patterns.
Granular segmentation insights revealing how product types, installation modes, component classes, communications, applications, and vertical requirements determine IO-Link adoption pathways
Insightful segmentation analysis shows how adoption and technical requirements vary across product types, installation modes, component-level offerings, communication approaches, application domains, and end-user verticals. When viewed through the lens of product type, attention concentrates on actuators, analog devices, RFID devices, sensors, and valve manifolds, with sensors subdivided into flow, level, photoelectric, pressure, proximity, and temperature types; each sensor class brings unique signal characteristics and diagnostic needs that shape device firmware and master configurations. In parallel, installation decisions are frequently dichotomized between new installations and retrofits, where retrofit projects prioritize compatibility, non-invasive wiring, and minimized commissioning time.
At the component level, distinctions between IO-Link devices (sensors and actuators), IO-Link masters, and IO-Link software influence procurement and integration pathways because device capabilities and master topologies determine downstream data availability. Communication choices between wired and wireless options further affect determinism, latency, and maintenance expectations. Application context-ranging from discrete automation and factory automation to material handling, packaging, and process automation-also governs device ruggedization, response times, and functional safety integration. Finally, end-user industry requirements introduce additional granularity: automotive environments emphasize assembly line automation, body shop processes, painting systems, and welding automation; food and beverage operations focus on bottling, filling, packaging, and processing hygiene and washdown standards; oil and gas demands solutions suited to downstream, midstream, and upstream conditions; and pharmaceuticals requires careful attention to bottling, liquid processing, and packaging traceability. These layered segmentation lenses together indicate that no single product strategy fits all contexts, and that differentiated portfolios and configurable solutions are essential for wide-ranging adoption.
Regional dynamics and demand patterns across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence adoption, supply strategies, and service localization
Regional dynamics shape both demand patterns and supply strategies in the IO-Link space, with each geography exhibiting distinct drivers and constraints. In the Americas, adoption is influenced by heavy industry, automotive ecosystems, and retrofit programs that favor solutions minimizing downtime; incentives for modernization and a strong service provider network support deployments across assembly plants and process facilities. Meanwhile, Europe, the Middle East & Africa shows high receptivity to standards-driven integration and factory modernization programs, with regulatory frameworks, energy efficiency initiatives, and established automation clusters promoting extensive use of device-level diagnostics and interoperable software stacks.
Asia-Pacific presents a dense manufacturing base with accelerating digitalization across electronics, automotive, food & beverage, and consumer goods sectors, leading to widespread interest in scalable IO-Link deployments that can be applied across greenfield sites and retrofit opportunities. Supply chain proximal manufacturing and parts sourcing in the region also influence vendor strategies, with many suppliers maintaining regional engineering and stocking to support just-in-time deployments. Across all regions, localization of service, adherence to regional compliance regimes, and partnerships with local integrators are decisive factors in successful adoption and long-term value realization.
Competitive positioning and supplier strategies revealing how vendors combine hardware breadth, software depth, and partner ecosystems to accelerate IO-Link adoption
Leading technology providers and systems integrators are differentiating through three broad approaches: expanding device portfolios, investing in software and cloud connectivity, and reinforcing go-to-market partnerships with channel and service networks. Some vendors are emphasizing comprehensive hardware ecosystems that span sensors, actuators, valve manifolds, and IO-Link masters, enabling single-vendor interoperability and simplified support. Others are prioritizing software stacks-device configuration tools, fleet management dashboards, and edge connectors-to help customers translate device telemetry into actionable maintenance and performance insights.
Strategic partnerships, co-engineering agreements, and targeted acquisitions are common tactics for accelerating capability delivery. Firms that succeed typically combine deep domain expertise in specific verticals with scalable product lines and strong partner channels. Attention to certification, adherence to open standards, and support for hybrid communication topologies further distinguishes vendors that can serve both conservative brownfield customers and progressive greenfield adopters. Ultimately, the competitive landscape rewards companies that can reduce total cost of ownership through lifecycle services, rapid commissioning tools, and clear upgrade paths from legacy I/O to device-level digitalization.
Actionable strategic playbook for industry leaders combining interoperability, retrofit solutions, regional supply resilience, software investment, and cybersecurity priorities
Industry leaders should adopt an integrated strategy that balances product innovation with pragmatic deployment pathways to capture measurable value. First, prioritize interoperability and open standards support to reduce integration friction and to protect customer investments in multi-vendor environments. Second, design modular offerings and retrofit-friendly kits that lower the barrier for brownfield upgrades and shorten time-to-value. Third, strengthen regional supply and service footprints to reduce lead times and to mitigate trade-policy exposure, while offering engineering support packages that simplify component substitution when needed.
Additionally, invest in software platforms that centralize device management and analytics, and that provide clear migration paths for customers seeking to move data from edge devices to enterprise systems. Emphasize cybersecurity by embedding secure boot, authenticated configuration, and encrypted communications into product roadmaps, and by offering managed security options for customers with constrained internal resources. Finally, cultivate partnerships with systems integrators and OEMs to co-develop validated solution blueprints for priority verticals, thereby accelerating referenceable deployments and shortening sales cycles.
Methodological overview explaining the multi-source, interview-driven, and triangulated approach used to derive practical, validated insights for decision-makers
The research underpinning this analysis combined primary and secondary intelligence, qualitative interviews, and cross-validation techniques to ensure robust findings. Primary inputs included structured interviews with OEM engineers, systems integrators, and end users across manufacturing, process industries, and logistics to capture operational priorities, pain points, and technology adoption drivers. Secondary sources comprised public-facing technical roadmaps, standards documentation, vendor product literature, and case studies that illuminate real-world implementation patterns. These inputs were synthesized using comparative analysis to identify consistent themes and divergent practices.
Data validation followed a triangulation approach, reconciling insights from different stakeholder groups and assessing alignment with observable vendor roadmaps and publicly announced deployments. Scenario analysis explored the implications of supply chain disruptions and policy shifts, while segmentation mapping translated use-case requirements into product and service design considerations. Throughout, emphasis was placed on practical relevance: methodologies were chosen to support decision-makers seeking actionable guidance rather than abstract metrics, and conclusions were vetted with technical experts for accuracy and applicability.
Concluding synthesis highlighting IO-Link’s role as an operational enabler and the commercial and technical pathways to sustained adoption across industries
The collective evidence points to a clear imperative: IO-Link is not merely a device-level communications option but a foundational enabler for more resilient, observable, and serviceable industrial systems. Organizations that adopt IO-Link thoughtfully-beginning with high-impact pilot use cases, prioritizing retrofits where appropriate, and investing in centralized device management-can unlock tangible improvements in uptime, quality control, and maintenance efficiency. At the same time, supply chain considerations and regional regulatory nuances mean that implementation paths must be customized to each operational context.
Looking forward, successful adopters will be those that couple technical deployment with commercial models that emphasize lifecycle services, spare parts strategies, and local support. Vendors that offer comprehensive portfolios alongside flexible integration tools and strong partner ecosystems will capture the greatest traction. Ultimately, the strategic value of IO-Link will be realized through disciplined roll-outs, clear measurement of operational outcomes, and continuous alignment between device capabilities and business objectives.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Strategic introduction to IO-Link and how device-level digitalization unlocks commissioning, diagnostics, and operational visibility across production environments
IO-Link has become a cornerstone technology in modern industrial automation by enabling bidirectional, device-level communication that transcends traditional binary I/O architectures. As manufacturers pursue higher asset visibility and more deterministic control, IO-Link supports parameter transfer, diagnostic reporting, and device replacement workflows that materially reduce commissioning time. In addition to simplifying wiring and lowering installation complexity, IO-Link enables richer sensor and actuator data to flow into control and analytics layers, which in turn supports predictive maintenance, condition monitoring, and faster changeovers.
Transitioning from legacy hardwired systems toward IO-Link-enabled architectures is rarely an all-or-nothing decision. Rather, adoption typically follows a phased pattern beginning with high-value use cases such as quality-critical sensors on assembly lines or condition-monitored actuators in process-critical loops. Over time, integrators and OEMs extend IO-Link across cells and lines, integrating masters and device description tools into edge compute nodes and higher-level PLC/SCADA systems. This gradual progression preserves existing assets while layering digital capabilities, enabling manufacturers to optimize performance without wholesale replacement of installed equipment.
How digitalization, interoperable standards, hybrid communications, and retrofit-first strategies are reshaping the IO-Link ecosystem and procurement priorities
The IO-Link landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three converging forces: the march of industrial digitalization, the rise of interoperable ecosystem standards, and the increasing demand for deployment flexibility. Advances in seamless integration frameworks such as OPC-UA and edge computing are allowing IO-Link data to flow directly into analytics platforms, enabling faster root-cause analysis and context-rich alerts. Parallel to this, manufacturers are prioritizing retrofitability, favoring IO-Link devices and masters designed to fit within existing architectures and minimize downtime during upgrades.
Another major dynamic is the broadening of communication options. While wired IO-Link remains the backbone for deterministic, high-reliability applications, the emergence of IO-Link Wireless and hybrid solutions is expanding use cases into mobile, rotating, or difficult-to-cable zones. At the same time, suppliers are consolidating software capabilities-device management, lifecycle tools, and cloud connectors-so customers can manage device fleets centrally. Taken together, these shifts are reorienting decisions from simple unit replacement toward holistic system evolution, where interoperability, lifecycle services, and secure data flows are the primary procurement drivers.
Assessment of cumulative tariff influences through 2025 and how trade policy shifts are prompting supply chain localization, design modularity, and strategic sourcing adjustments
Trade policy shifts and tariff adjustments announced in recent cycles have prompted many industrial buyers and suppliers to reassess supply chain exposure and procurement strategies. The cumulative effect of tariffs introduced or revised through 2025 has been to increase landed costs for certain imported components and to accelerate supplier diversification efforts. In response, OEMs and system integrators are prioritizing local sourcing where feasible and emphasising designs that reduce dependence on tariff-sensitive subassemblies.
At the operational level, these trade-related pressures have reinforced the business case for solutions that extend asset life and simplify retrofits-approaches that reduce the frequency of full equipment replacement and mitigate exposure to fluctuating import duties. Meanwhile, manufacturers are placing greater emphasis on modular architectures that can accommodate component substitution without significant redesign. From a strategic perspective, tariff-led uncertainty is increasing the value of supplier relationships that include engineering support, stocking strategies, and regional manufacturing footprints, because these reduce lead-time volatility and allow faster response to changing demand patterns.
Granular segmentation insights revealing how product types, installation modes, component classes, communications, applications, and vertical requirements determine IO-Link adoption pathways
Insightful segmentation analysis shows how adoption and technical requirements vary across product types, installation modes, component-level offerings, communication approaches, application domains, and end-user verticals. When viewed through the lens of product type, attention concentrates on actuators, analog devices, RFID devices, sensors, and valve manifolds, with sensors subdivided into flow, level, photoelectric, pressure, proximity, and temperature types; each sensor class brings unique signal characteristics and diagnostic needs that shape device firmware and master configurations. In parallel, installation decisions are frequently dichotomized between new installations and retrofits, where retrofit projects prioritize compatibility, non-invasive wiring, and minimized commissioning time.
At the component level, distinctions between IO-Link devices (sensors and actuators), IO-Link masters, and IO-Link software influence procurement and integration pathways because device capabilities and master topologies determine downstream data availability. Communication choices between wired and wireless options further affect determinism, latency, and maintenance expectations. Application context-ranging from discrete automation and factory automation to material handling, packaging, and process automation-also governs device ruggedization, response times, and functional safety integration. Finally, end-user industry requirements introduce additional granularity: automotive environments emphasize assembly line automation, body shop processes, painting systems, and welding automation; food and beverage operations focus on bottling, filling, packaging, and processing hygiene and washdown standards; oil and gas demands solutions suited to downstream, midstream, and upstream conditions; and pharmaceuticals requires careful attention to bottling, liquid processing, and packaging traceability. These layered segmentation lenses together indicate that no single product strategy fits all contexts, and that differentiated portfolios and configurable solutions are essential for wide-ranging adoption.
Regional dynamics and demand patterns across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence adoption, supply strategies, and service localization
Regional dynamics shape both demand patterns and supply strategies in the IO-Link space, with each geography exhibiting distinct drivers and constraints. In the Americas, adoption is influenced by heavy industry, automotive ecosystems, and retrofit programs that favor solutions minimizing downtime; incentives for modernization and a strong service provider network support deployments across assembly plants and process facilities. Meanwhile, Europe, the Middle East & Africa shows high receptivity to standards-driven integration and factory modernization programs, with regulatory frameworks, energy efficiency initiatives, and established automation clusters promoting extensive use of device-level diagnostics and interoperable software stacks.
Asia-Pacific presents a dense manufacturing base with accelerating digitalization across electronics, automotive, food & beverage, and consumer goods sectors, leading to widespread interest in scalable IO-Link deployments that can be applied across greenfield sites and retrofit opportunities. Supply chain proximal manufacturing and parts sourcing in the region also influence vendor strategies, with many suppliers maintaining regional engineering and stocking to support just-in-time deployments. Across all regions, localization of service, adherence to regional compliance regimes, and partnerships with local integrators are decisive factors in successful adoption and long-term value realization.
Competitive positioning and supplier strategies revealing how vendors combine hardware breadth, software depth, and partner ecosystems to accelerate IO-Link adoption
Leading technology providers and systems integrators are differentiating through three broad approaches: expanding device portfolios, investing in software and cloud connectivity, and reinforcing go-to-market partnerships with channel and service networks. Some vendors are emphasizing comprehensive hardware ecosystems that span sensors, actuators, valve manifolds, and IO-Link masters, enabling single-vendor interoperability and simplified support. Others are prioritizing software stacks-device configuration tools, fleet management dashboards, and edge connectors-to help customers translate device telemetry into actionable maintenance and performance insights.
Strategic partnerships, co-engineering agreements, and targeted acquisitions are common tactics for accelerating capability delivery. Firms that succeed typically combine deep domain expertise in specific verticals with scalable product lines and strong partner channels. Attention to certification, adherence to open standards, and support for hybrid communication topologies further distinguishes vendors that can serve both conservative brownfield customers and progressive greenfield adopters. Ultimately, the competitive landscape rewards companies that can reduce total cost of ownership through lifecycle services, rapid commissioning tools, and clear upgrade paths from legacy I/O to device-level digitalization.
Actionable strategic playbook for industry leaders combining interoperability, retrofit solutions, regional supply resilience, software investment, and cybersecurity priorities
Industry leaders should adopt an integrated strategy that balances product innovation with pragmatic deployment pathways to capture measurable value. First, prioritize interoperability and open standards support to reduce integration friction and to protect customer investments in multi-vendor environments. Second, design modular offerings and retrofit-friendly kits that lower the barrier for brownfield upgrades and shorten time-to-value. Third, strengthen regional supply and service footprints to reduce lead times and to mitigate trade-policy exposure, while offering engineering support packages that simplify component substitution when needed.
Additionally, invest in software platforms that centralize device management and analytics, and that provide clear migration paths for customers seeking to move data from edge devices to enterprise systems. Emphasize cybersecurity by embedding secure boot, authenticated configuration, and encrypted communications into product roadmaps, and by offering managed security options for customers with constrained internal resources. Finally, cultivate partnerships with systems integrators and OEMs to co-develop validated solution blueprints for priority verticals, thereby accelerating referenceable deployments and shortening sales cycles.
Methodological overview explaining the multi-source, interview-driven, and triangulated approach used to derive practical, validated insights for decision-makers
The research underpinning this analysis combined primary and secondary intelligence, qualitative interviews, and cross-validation techniques to ensure robust findings. Primary inputs included structured interviews with OEM engineers, systems integrators, and end users across manufacturing, process industries, and logistics to capture operational priorities, pain points, and technology adoption drivers. Secondary sources comprised public-facing technical roadmaps, standards documentation, vendor product literature, and case studies that illuminate real-world implementation patterns. These inputs were synthesized using comparative analysis to identify consistent themes and divergent practices.
Data validation followed a triangulation approach, reconciling insights from different stakeholder groups and assessing alignment with observable vendor roadmaps and publicly announced deployments. Scenario analysis explored the implications of supply chain disruptions and policy shifts, while segmentation mapping translated use-case requirements into product and service design considerations. Throughout, emphasis was placed on practical relevance: methodologies were chosen to support decision-makers seeking actionable guidance rather than abstract metrics, and conclusions were vetted with technical experts for accuracy and applicability.
Concluding synthesis highlighting IO-Link’s role as an operational enabler and the commercial and technical pathways to sustained adoption across industries
The collective evidence points to a clear imperative: IO-Link is not merely a device-level communications option but a foundational enabler for more resilient, observable, and serviceable industrial systems. Organizations that adopt IO-Link thoughtfully-beginning with high-impact pilot use cases, prioritizing retrofits where appropriate, and investing in centralized device management-can unlock tangible improvements in uptime, quality control, and maintenance efficiency. At the same time, supply chain considerations and regional regulatory nuances mean that implementation paths must be customized to each operational context.
Looking forward, successful adopters will be those that couple technical deployment with commercial models that emphasize lifecycle services, spare parts strategies, and local support. Vendors that offer comprehensive portfolios alongside flexible integration tools and strong partner ecosystems will capture the greatest traction. Ultimately, the strategic value of IO-Link will be realized through disciplined roll-outs, clear measurement of operational outcomes, and continuous alignment between device capabilities and business objectives.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
194 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rapid integration of IO-Link sensors with TSN-enabled industrial Ethernet for deterministic communication
- 5.2. Integration of IO-Link devices with cloud-based analytics platforms for predictive maintenance insights
- 5.3. Advancements in IO-Link Wireless networking for cable-free installation in harsh industrial environments
- 5.4. Implementation of functional safety-rated IO-Link components for compliance with IEC 61508 and SIL standards
- 5.5. Deployment of edge computing gateways with embedded IO-Link master interfaces for local data processing
- 5.6. Standardization efforts to integrate IO-Link with OPC UA for seamless interoperability across automation systems
- 5.7. Adoption of AI-enabled IO-Link sensors for real-time anomaly detection and process optimization in manufacturing
- 5.8. Growing use of miniaturized IO-Link-enabled modules for space-constrained robotic and machine building applications
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. IO-Link Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Actuators
- 8.2. Analog Devices
- 8.3. RfId Devices
- 8.4. Sensors
- 8.4.1. Flow Sensors
- 8.4.2. Level Sensors
- 8.4.3. Photoelectric Sensors
- 8.4.4. Pressure Sensors
- 8.4.5. Proximity Sensors
- 8.4.6. Temperature Sensors
- 8.5. Valve Manifolds
- 9. IO-Link Market, by Installation Type
- 9.1. New Installation
- 9.2. Retrofit
- 10. IO-Link Market, by Component Type
- 10.1. IO-Link Device (Sensors and Actuators)
- 10.2. IO-Link Master
- 10.3. IO-Link Software
- 11. IO-Link Market, by Communication Type
- 11.1. Wired
- 11.2. Wireless
- 12. IO-Link Market, by Application
- 12.1. Discrete Automation
- 12.2. Factory Automation
- 12.3. Material Handling
- 12.4. Packaging
- 12.5. Process Automation
- 13. IO-Link Market, by End User Industry
- 13.1. Automotive
- 13.1.1. Assembly Line Automation
- 13.1.2. Body Shop Processes
- 13.1.3. Painting Systems
- 13.1.4. Welding Automation
- 13.2. Chemicals
- 13.3. Food & Beverage
- 13.3.1. Bottling
- 13.3.2. Filling
- 13.3.3. Packaging
- 13.3.4. Processing
- 13.4. Metals & Mining
- 13.5. Oil & Gas
- 13.5.1. Downstream
- 13.5.2. Midstream
- 13.5.3. Upstream
- 13.6. Pharmaceuticals
- 13.6.1. Bottling
- 13.6.2. Liquid Processing
- 13.6.3. Packaging
- 13.7. Pulp & Paper
- 13.8. Water & Waste Water
- 14. IO-Link Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. IO-Link Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. IO-Link Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. SICK AG
- 17.3.2. ifm electronic GmbH
- 17.3.3. Pepperl+Fuchs GmbH
- 17.3.4. Balluff GmbH
- 17.3.5. Siemens AG
- 17.3.6. Rockwell Automation Inc
- 17.3.7. Beckhoff Automation GmbH
- 17.3.8. Banner Engineering Corp
- 17.3.9. Festo SE & Co KG
- 17.3.10. Turck GmbH & Co KG
- 17.3.11. Murrelektronik GmbH
- 17.3.12. Wenglor Sensoric GmbH
- 17.3.13. Baumer Holding AG
- 17.3.14. Datalogic S.p.A.
- 17.3.15. Carlo Gavazzi Holding AG
- 17.3.16. Weidmüller Interface GmbH & Co KG
- 17.3.17. Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co KG
- 17.3.18. Hans Turck GmbH & Co KG
- 17.3.19. Leuze electronic GmbH
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
