High-Performance Textile Market by Product Type (Composite Material, Fabric, Fiber), Fiber Material (Aramid, Carbon Fiber, Glass Fiber), End Use Industry, Sales Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The High-Performance Textile Market was valued at USD 12.51 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 13.39 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.28%, reaching USD 21.97 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation to the evolving high-performance textile landscape and the strategic considerations shaping material selection and supply chain decisions
High-performance textiles have become foundational materials across advanced industries, driven by a convergence of performance requirements, regulatory scrutiny, and innovation in polymer science. This executive summary introduces the strategic context for stakeholders who design, source, or deploy advanced composite materials, technical fabrics, and specialty fibers. It highlights critical trends that are reshaping product specifications, supplier relationships, and end-use adoption.
Over the past several years, advancements in fiber engineering and matrix technologies have unlocked new combinations of strength, durability, and weight reduction. As a result, product teams face evolving trade-offs between cost, manufacturability, and life-cycle performance. Meanwhile, heightened emphasis on safety standards and circularity is prompting procurement and R&D teams to prioritize traceability and recyclability alongside traditional mechanical metrics. By framing these developments in practical terms, this introduction prepares readers to assess competitive positioning and investment priorities with clarity and confidence.
How material innovation, supply chain realignment, and sustainability mandates are collectively reshaping the future of high-performance textile adoption and competitiveness
The landscape for high-performance textiles is undergoing transformative shifts propelled by material innovation, supply chain realignment, and changing end-market demands. Novel fiber formulations and hybrid composite architectures are enabling designers to meet more exacting specifications for thermal stability, impact resistance, and fatigue life, which in turn are expanding application envelopes in aerospace, automotive, medical, and industrial sectors.
Concurrently, manufacturers and Tier 1 suppliers are rethinking sourcing strategies in response to geopolitical friction, raw material volatility, and increasing regulatory pressure on production footprints. This has accelerated nearshoring initiatives and deeper vertical integration to secure continuity and reduce lead-time exposure. At the same time, sustainability is no longer peripheral: extended producer responsibility, recycled feedstocks, and low-energy processing are material drivers for product development. Together, these forces are creating a dynamic environment where agility, technical differentiation, and supply chain transparency determine which organizations can scale advanced textile solutions successfully.
Understanding the broader operational and strategic consequences of the United States tariff measures for 2025 and how organizations can reconfigure supply and sourcing strategies
United States tariff adjustments announced for 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for companies that import raw fibers, composite prepregs, and finished technical textiles. Tariff changes alter the relative competitiveness of sourcing geographies and can materially influence supplier selection, contract negotiations, and inventory strategies. In response, procurement teams are revisiting total landed cost models and evaluating whether to absorb incremental duties, pass costs downstream, or redesign products to rely on domestically sourced inputs.
Beyond cost effects, tariffs create second-order impacts on supplier ecosystems by incentivizing localization and strategic partnerships. Domestic producers may increase investment to capture displaced demand, while foreign suppliers reassess regional hub strategies and tariff mitigation techniques such as tariff engineering and reclassification. Notably, research and development collaboration patterns may shift as firms look to de-risk supply by diversifying material bases and qualifying alternate fiber and composite systems. Ultimately, these policy-driven dynamics accentuate the value of supply chain visibility and scenario planning when developing product roadmaps and negotiating long-term agreements.
Comprehensive segmentation insights that reveal how product architecture, end-use demands, fiber chemistry, and sales channels converge to shape innovation and procurement choices
Segmentation offers a practical lens to interpret demand dynamics and guide product development priorities. Based on product type, the market can be framed across composite materials, fabrics, and fibers. Composite materials further differentiate into aramid composite, carbon fiber composite, and glass fiber composite, each of which is produced with either thermoplastic matrix composite or thermoset matrix composite options. Fabric classifications include knitted fabric, nonwoven fabric, and woven fabric, where knitted varieties break down into warp knitted and weft knitted, nonwovens into meltblown, needlepunch, and spunbond, and woven types into plain weave, satin weave, and twill weave. Fiber-level segmentation highlights aramid fiber, carbon fiber, and glass fiber, with aramid subdivided into meta aramid and para aramid, carbon fiber into PAN based and pitch based, and glass fiber into E glass and S glass.
Examining end-use industries reveals differentiated adoption rates and specification drivers across aerospace and defense, automotive, industrial, medical, and sports and leisure. Aerospace and defense demand performance across civil aviation, defense, and space niches where weight reduction and fatigue life are paramount. Automotive requirements split between aftermarket and OEM channels, emphasizing cost and manufacturability. Industrial use spans construction, electrical, and oil and gas applications that prioritize fire performance and durability. In medical applications, diagnostic, orthopedic, and surgical uses necessitate biocompatibility and sterilization resilience. Sports and leisure encompasses apparel, equipment, and protective gear where comfort, breathability, and impact protection intersect with lightweight performance.
Fiber material segmentation mirrors product-level distinctions, highlighting aramid, carbon, and glass fibers with their respective subtypes such as meta and para aramids, PAN based and pitch based carbon fibers, and E glass and S glass varieties. Sales channel segmentation further clarifies routes to market across direct institutional and OEM engagements, and distribution channels including e-commerce, retailers, and wholesalers. This multi-dimensional segmentation underscores how technical requirements, certification protocols, and channel economics jointly determine adoption patterns and innovation focus areas.
Regional dynamics and competitive clusters that determine manufacturing capabilities, regulatory influence, and commercialization pathways across major global markets
Geographic dynamics play a decisive role in the development, commercialization, and adoption of high-performance textiles. The Americas continue to emphasize vertically integrated supply chains and advanced manufacturing clusters that support aerospace, automotive, and defense programs. Domestic capacity in resin systems and fiber conversion facilities complements regional demand for protective gear and industrial textiles, creating localized ecosystems that facilitate rapid prototyping and qualification cycles.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigor and sustainability mandates guide material qualifications and supplier selection, while established aerospace and automotive supply bases sustain high technical standards. This region also demonstrates strong demand for medical-grade textiles and integrated recycling initiatives. In Asia-Pacific, manufacturing scale and cost competitiveness coexist with rising R&D investment and expanding OEM ecosystems, driving accelerated adoption across consumer electronics, automotive, and sports segments. Across all regions, cross-border collaboration, tariff considerations, and regional policy frameworks are reshaping where value is created and how quickly innovations move from laboratory to certified production.
Strategic behaviors and operational priorities of high-performance textile leaders that drive resilience, certification excellence, and sustained innovation advantage
Industry leaders display a consistent set of strategic behaviors that underpin long-term resilience and market influence. Leading manufacturers invest in multidisciplinary R&D teams that bridge polymer science, textile engineering, and manufacturing process automation to accelerate material maturation. They also cultivate stable upstream relationships with fiber producers and resin suppliers to secure preferential access to novel feedstocks and to co-develop matrix-fiber integrations that enhance performance metrics.
Operationally, top companies prioritize advanced quality systems and rigorous certification pathways to meet the demands of safety-critical applications. Many pursue selective vertical integration or long-term strategic alliances to shorten qualification timelines and reduce exposure to supply shocks. At the same time, market frontrunners are active in sustainability initiatives-establishing takeback programs, validating recycled-content pathways, and investing in low-energy processing technologies. These firms often balance a portfolio approach that spans premium engineered offerings and cost-optimized variants to serve both OEMs and distribution channels, enabling scalable growth while protecting margins in competitive segments.
Actionable strategic and operational recommendations that leaders can implement to reduce supply chain risk, accelerate qualification cycles, and embed sustainability into product design
Industry leaders can take several pragmatic steps to convert strategic insight into measurable advantage. First, they should accelerate material diversification programs by qualifying alternative fibers and matrix systems in parallel, thereby reducing single-source risk and enabling cost-performance optimization across applications. Second, investing in digital traceability and supplier visibility will mitigate tariff and supply disruption risks while supporting sustainability claims required by OEMs and regulators.
Third, companies should strengthen collaborative frameworks with end users to co-develop specifications that reduce qualification timelines and enhance fit-for-purpose design. Fourth, operational investments in flexible manufacturing capability and modular production cells will allow firms to adapt rapidly to shifting demand across aerospace, medical, and automotive markets. Finally, integrating circularity principles into product development-such as designing for disassembly, validating recycled feedstocks, and adopting low-energy curing-will meet growing regulatory expectations and create differentiation in procurement decisions. By implementing these recommendations, organizations can improve their strategic positioning and responsiveness to emerging market dynamics.
A rigorous, multi-method research approach combining expert interviews, standards validation, capability mapping, and scenario analysis to produce actionable industry intelligence
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, defensible insights. Primary research involved structured interviews with material scientists, supply chain managers, and product engineers across end-use industries, supplemented by technical whitepapers and standards documentation to validate performance thresholds. Secondary research incorporated industry journals, patent filings, and relevant regulatory guidance to trace technological trajectories and compliance implications.
Analytical techniques included comparative capability mapping to evaluate supplier strengths, scenario analysis to assess tariff and supply disruption impacts, and lifecycle assessment frameworks to gauge sustainability implications for material choices. Where applicable, historical adoption patterns and certification timelines were examined to model typical qualification pathways. Throughout, cross-validation between primary expert input and independent technical sources ensured that conclusions reflect consensus perspectives and practical implementation realities rather than single-source conjecture.
Synthesis of strategic imperatives for converting technical innovation, supply chain resilience, and sustainability commitments into sustained competitive advantage
In conclusion, the high-performance textile sector stands at an inflection point characterized by rapid material innovation, evolving regulatory expectations, and shifting supply chain geographies. Stakeholders who prioritize diversified material strategies, invest in supplier visibility, and align product design with sustainability objectives will be best positioned to capture growth opportunities in safety-critical and performance-driven markets. Moreover, the interplay of tariff policy and regional manufacturing capacity underscores the importance of agile sourcing and localized manufacturing strategies.
Decision-makers should focus on shortening qualification cycles through deeper collaboration with end users and on building flexible manufacturing capability to respond to changing demand profiles. Equally important is embedding circularity and traceability into product roadmaps to meet emerging regulatory and customer requirements. By taking these strategic actions, organizations can convert technical excellence into durable competitive advantage and accelerate the translation of laboratory innovations into certified, market-ready solutions.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to the evolving high-performance textile landscape and the strategic considerations shaping material selection and supply chain decisions
High-performance textiles have become foundational materials across advanced industries, driven by a convergence of performance requirements, regulatory scrutiny, and innovation in polymer science. This executive summary introduces the strategic context for stakeholders who design, source, or deploy advanced composite materials, technical fabrics, and specialty fibers. It highlights critical trends that are reshaping product specifications, supplier relationships, and end-use adoption.
Over the past several years, advancements in fiber engineering and matrix technologies have unlocked new combinations of strength, durability, and weight reduction. As a result, product teams face evolving trade-offs between cost, manufacturability, and life-cycle performance. Meanwhile, heightened emphasis on safety standards and circularity is prompting procurement and R&D teams to prioritize traceability and recyclability alongside traditional mechanical metrics. By framing these developments in practical terms, this introduction prepares readers to assess competitive positioning and investment priorities with clarity and confidence.
How material innovation, supply chain realignment, and sustainability mandates are collectively reshaping the future of high-performance textile adoption and competitiveness
The landscape for high-performance textiles is undergoing transformative shifts propelled by material innovation, supply chain realignment, and changing end-market demands. Novel fiber formulations and hybrid composite architectures are enabling designers to meet more exacting specifications for thermal stability, impact resistance, and fatigue life, which in turn are expanding application envelopes in aerospace, automotive, medical, and industrial sectors.
Concurrently, manufacturers and Tier 1 suppliers are rethinking sourcing strategies in response to geopolitical friction, raw material volatility, and increasing regulatory pressure on production footprints. This has accelerated nearshoring initiatives and deeper vertical integration to secure continuity and reduce lead-time exposure. At the same time, sustainability is no longer peripheral: extended producer responsibility, recycled feedstocks, and low-energy processing are material drivers for product development. Together, these forces are creating a dynamic environment where agility, technical differentiation, and supply chain transparency determine which organizations can scale advanced textile solutions successfully.
Understanding the broader operational and strategic consequences of the United States tariff measures for 2025 and how organizations can reconfigure supply and sourcing strategies
United States tariff adjustments announced for 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for companies that import raw fibers, composite prepregs, and finished technical textiles. Tariff changes alter the relative competitiveness of sourcing geographies and can materially influence supplier selection, contract negotiations, and inventory strategies. In response, procurement teams are revisiting total landed cost models and evaluating whether to absorb incremental duties, pass costs downstream, or redesign products to rely on domestically sourced inputs.
Beyond cost effects, tariffs create second-order impacts on supplier ecosystems by incentivizing localization and strategic partnerships. Domestic producers may increase investment to capture displaced demand, while foreign suppliers reassess regional hub strategies and tariff mitigation techniques such as tariff engineering and reclassification. Notably, research and development collaboration patterns may shift as firms look to de-risk supply by diversifying material bases and qualifying alternate fiber and composite systems. Ultimately, these policy-driven dynamics accentuate the value of supply chain visibility and scenario planning when developing product roadmaps and negotiating long-term agreements.
Comprehensive segmentation insights that reveal how product architecture, end-use demands, fiber chemistry, and sales channels converge to shape innovation and procurement choices
Segmentation offers a practical lens to interpret demand dynamics and guide product development priorities. Based on product type, the market can be framed across composite materials, fabrics, and fibers. Composite materials further differentiate into aramid composite, carbon fiber composite, and glass fiber composite, each of which is produced with either thermoplastic matrix composite or thermoset matrix composite options. Fabric classifications include knitted fabric, nonwoven fabric, and woven fabric, where knitted varieties break down into warp knitted and weft knitted, nonwovens into meltblown, needlepunch, and spunbond, and woven types into plain weave, satin weave, and twill weave. Fiber-level segmentation highlights aramid fiber, carbon fiber, and glass fiber, with aramid subdivided into meta aramid and para aramid, carbon fiber into PAN based and pitch based, and glass fiber into E glass and S glass.
Examining end-use industries reveals differentiated adoption rates and specification drivers across aerospace and defense, automotive, industrial, medical, and sports and leisure. Aerospace and defense demand performance across civil aviation, defense, and space niches where weight reduction and fatigue life are paramount. Automotive requirements split between aftermarket and OEM channels, emphasizing cost and manufacturability. Industrial use spans construction, electrical, and oil and gas applications that prioritize fire performance and durability. In medical applications, diagnostic, orthopedic, and surgical uses necessitate biocompatibility and sterilization resilience. Sports and leisure encompasses apparel, equipment, and protective gear where comfort, breathability, and impact protection intersect with lightweight performance.
Fiber material segmentation mirrors product-level distinctions, highlighting aramid, carbon, and glass fibers with their respective subtypes such as meta and para aramids, PAN based and pitch based carbon fibers, and E glass and S glass varieties. Sales channel segmentation further clarifies routes to market across direct institutional and OEM engagements, and distribution channels including e-commerce, retailers, and wholesalers. This multi-dimensional segmentation underscores how technical requirements, certification protocols, and channel economics jointly determine adoption patterns and innovation focus areas.
Regional dynamics and competitive clusters that determine manufacturing capabilities, regulatory influence, and commercialization pathways across major global markets
Geographic dynamics play a decisive role in the development, commercialization, and adoption of high-performance textiles. The Americas continue to emphasize vertically integrated supply chains and advanced manufacturing clusters that support aerospace, automotive, and defense programs. Domestic capacity in resin systems and fiber conversion facilities complements regional demand for protective gear and industrial textiles, creating localized ecosystems that facilitate rapid prototyping and qualification cycles.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigor and sustainability mandates guide material qualifications and supplier selection, while established aerospace and automotive supply bases sustain high technical standards. This region also demonstrates strong demand for medical-grade textiles and integrated recycling initiatives. In Asia-Pacific, manufacturing scale and cost competitiveness coexist with rising R&D investment and expanding OEM ecosystems, driving accelerated adoption across consumer electronics, automotive, and sports segments. Across all regions, cross-border collaboration, tariff considerations, and regional policy frameworks are reshaping where value is created and how quickly innovations move from laboratory to certified production.
Strategic behaviors and operational priorities of high-performance textile leaders that drive resilience, certification excellence, and sustained innovation advantage
Industry leaders display a consistent set of strategic behaviors that underpin long-term resilience and market influence. Leading manufacturers invest in multidisciplinary R&D teams that bridge polymer science, textile engineering, and manufacturing process automation to accelerate material maturation. They also cultivate stable upstream relationships with fiber producers and resin suppliers to secure preferential access to novel feedstocks and to co-develop matrix-fiber integrations that enhance performance metrics.
Operationally, top companies prioritize advanced quality systems and rigorous certification pathways to meet the demands of safety-critical applications. Many pursue selective vertical integration or long-term strategic alliances to shorten qualification timelines and reduce exposure to supply shocks. At the same time, market frontrunners are active in sustainability initiatives-establishing takeback programs, validating recycled-content pathways, and investing in low-energy processing technologies. These firms often balance a portfolio approach that spans premium engineered offerings and cost-optimized variants to serve both OEMs and distribution channels, enabling scalable growth while protecting margins in competitive segments.
Actionable strategic and operational recommendations that leaders can implement to reduce supply chain risk, accelerate qualification cycles, and embed sustainability into product design
Industry leaders can take several pragmatic steps to convert strategic insight into measurable advantage. First, they should accelerate material diversification programs by qualifying alternative fibers and matrix systems in parallel, thereby reducing single-source risk and enabling cost-performance optimization across applications. Second, investing in digital traceability and supplier visibility will mitigate tariff and supply disruption risks while supporting sustainability claims required by OEMs and regulators.
Third, companies should strengthen collaborative frameworks with end users to co-develop specifications that reduce qualification timelines and enhance fit-for-purpose design. Fourth, operational investments in flexible manufacturing capability and modular production cells will allow firms to adapt rapidly to shifting demand across aerospace, medical, and automotive markets. Finally, integrating circularity principles into product development-such as designing for disassembly, validating recycled feedstocks, and adopting low-energy curing-will meet growing regulatory expectations and create differentiation in procurement decisions. By implementing these recommendations, organizations can improve their strategic positioning and responsiveness to emerging market dynamics.
A rigorous, multi-method research approach combining expert interviews, standards validation, capability mapping, and scenario analysis to produce actionable industry intelligence
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, defensible insights. Primary research involved structured interviews with material scientists, supply chain managers, and product engineers across end-use industries, supplemented by technical whitepapers and standards documentation to validate performance thresholds. Secondary research incorporated industry journals, patent filings, and relevant regulatory guidance to trace technological trajectories and compliance implications.
Analytical techniques included comparative capability mapping to evaluate supplier strengths, scenario analysis to assess tariff and supply disruption impacts, and lifecycle assessment frameworks to gauge sustainability implications for material choices. Where applicable, historical adoption patterns and certification timelines were examined to model typical qualification pathways. Throughout, cross-validation between primary expert input and independent technical sources ensured that conclusions reflect consensus perspectives and practical implementation realities rather than single-source conjecture.
Synthesis of strategic imperatives for converting technical innovation, supply chain resilience, and sustainability commitments into sustained competitive advantage
In conclusion, the high-performance textile sector stands at an inflection point characterized by rapid material innovation, evolving regulatory expectations, and shifting supply chain geographies. Stakeholders who prioritize diversified material strategies, invest in supplier visibility, and align product design with sustainability objectives will be best positioned to capture growth opportunities in safety-critical and performance-driven markets. Moreover, the interplay of tariff policy and regional manufacturing capacity underscores the importance of agile sourcing and localized manufacturing strategies.
Decision-makers should focus on shortening qualification cycles through deeper collaboration with end users and on building flexible manufacturing capability to respond to changing demand profiles. Equally important is embedding circularity and traceability into product roadmaps to meet emerging regulatory and customer requirements. By taking these strategic actions, organizations can convert technical excellence into durable competitive advantage and accelerate the translation of laboratory innovations into certified, market-ready solutions.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
198 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Development of sustainable bio-based performance fibers to reduce carbon footprint in technical textiles
- 5.2. Adoption of smart textile integration with IoT sensors for real-time athlete performance monitoring
- 5.3. Advances in antimicrobial nanocoatings to enhance protective apparel for medical and industrial sectors
- 5.4. Emergence of recyclable thermoplastic elastomer composites for next-generation high-durability fabrics
- 5.5. Implementation of AI-driven textile manufacturing for predictive quality control and waste minimization
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. High-Performance Textile Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Composite Material
- 8.1.1. Aramid Composite
- 8.1.1.1. Thermoplastic Matrix Composite
- 8.1.1.2. Thermoset Matrix Composite
- 8.1.2. Carbon Fiber Composite
- 8.1.2.1. Thermoplastic Matrix Composite
- 8.1.2.2. Thermoset Matrix Composite
- 8.1.3. Glass Fiber Composite
- 8.1.3.1. Thermoplastic Matrix Composite
- 8.1.3.2. Thermoset Matrix Composite
- 8.2. Fabric
- 8.2.1. Knitted Fabric
- 8.2.1.1. Warp Knitted
- 8.2.1.2. Weft Knitted
- 8.2.2. Nonwoven Fabric
- 8.2.2.1. Meltblown
- 8.2.2.2. Needlepunch
- 8.2.2.3. Spunbond
- 8.2.3. Woven Fabric
- 8.2.3.1. Plain Weave
- 8.2.3.2. Satin Weave
- 8.2.3.3. Twill Weave
- 8.3. Fiber
- 8.3.1. Aramid Fiber
- 8.3.1.1. Meta Aramid
- 8.3.1.2. Para Aramid
- 8.3.2. Carbon Fiber
- 8.3.2.1. Pan Based
- 8.3.2.2. Pitch Based
- 8.3.3. Glass Fiber
- 8.3.3.1. E Glass
- 8.3.3.2. S Glass
- 9. High-Performance Textile Market, by Fiber Material
- 9.1. Aramid
- 9.1.1. Meta Aramid
- 9.1.2. Para Aramid
- 9.2. Carbon Fiber
- 9.2.1. Pan Based
- 9.2.2. Pitch Based
- 9.3. Glass Fiber
- 9.3.1. E Glass
- 9.3.2. S Glass
- 10. High-Performance Textile Market, by End Use Industry
- 10.1. Aerospace & Defense
- 10.1.1. Civil Aviation
- 10.1.2. Defense
- 10.1.3. Space
- 10.2. Automotive
- 10.2.1. Aftermarket
- 10.2.2. OEM
- 10.3. Industrial
- 10.3.1. Construction
- 10.3.2. Electrical
- 10.3.3. Oil & Gas
- 10.4. Medical
- 10.4.1. Diagnostic
- 10.4.2. Orthopedic
- 10.4.3. Surgical
- 10.5. Sports & Leisure
- 10.5.1. Apparel
- 10.5.2. Equipment
- 10.5.3. Protective Gear
- 11. High-Performance Textile Market, by Sales Channel
- 11.1. Direct
- 11.1.1. Institutional
- 11.1.2. OEM
- 11.2. Distribution
- 11.2.1. E Commerce
- 11.2.2. Retailers
- 11.2.3. Wholesalers
- 12. High-Performance Textile Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. High-Performance Textile Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. High-Performance Textile Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Arville Textiles Limited
- 15.3.2. Asahi Kasei Corporation
- 15.3.3. Avient Corporation
- 15.3.4. Baltex
- 15.3.5. Cass Materials Pty. Ltd.
- 15.3.6. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 15.3.7. Elevate Textiles, Inc.
- 15.3.8. Fabiosys Innovations Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.9. Freudenberg Performance Materials Holding GmbH
- 15.3.10. Hexcel Corporation
- 15.3.11. High Performance Textiles Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.12. Huvis Corp.
- 15.3.13. Kolon Industries, Inc.
- 15.3.14. Mitsui Chemicals Group
- 15.3.15. Performance Textiles
- 15.3.16. Porcher Industries
- 15.3.17. Spintex Engineering Ltd.
- 15.3.18. Suzhou Sikor Industry Co.,Ltd.
- 15.3.19. Swicofil AG
- 15.3.20. TBA Protective Technologies Ltd.
- 15.3.21. Tex Tech Industries Inc.
- 15.3.22. Toray Industries, Inc.
- 15.3.23. U-Long High-Tech Textile Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
