Hemp-based Food Market by Packaging (Bulk, Retail Packaged), Source (Conventional, Organic), Product Type, Application, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Hemp-based Food Market was valued at USD 6.07 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 6.51 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.39%, reaching USD 11.57 billion by 2032.
An authoritative introduction that frames hemp-based food ingredients as a strategic growth vector amid changing consumer preferences and supply chain dynamics
The hemp-based food sector is now at an inflection point where ingredient versatility, nutritional positioning, and consumer curiosity converge to create tangible market momentum. Hemp-derived products have advanced beyond niche interest into mainstream product development, driven by clear protein and oil profiles, fiber advantages, and a growing roster of regulatory clarifications that make commercialization more practicable. As a consequence, product developers, ingredient suppliers, and retailers are recalibrating portfolios to integrate hemp flour, oil, protein powders, and seeds across a wide set of applications.
In this environment, agility across the value chain matters. Sourcing strategies now prioritize traceability, consistent cannabinoid profiles, and certifications that resonate with health-conscious consumers. At the same time, R&D teams are leveraging hemp’s functional attributes to create differentiated bakery, beverage, dairy-alternative, meat-alternative, and snack offerings. Transitional pressures are apparent: supply chain constraints, evolving tariff and trade dynamics, and heightened scrutiny on labeling create near-term complexity but also open windows for first movers who can align quality, transparency, and commercial reach. This report frames those tensions, highlights the practical implications for decision-makers, and situates hemp-based foods within a broader trajectory of plant-based ingredient adoption.
A clear exposition of the major transformative shifts reshaping hemp-based food development, supply chains, and commercial routes to consumers
The hemp-based food landscape has experienced several transformative shifts that now set the stage for the next phase of growth and consolidation. First, consumer demand has matured from curiosity-driven trials to more sustained adoption based on functional benefits such as protein content, omega fatty acids, and fiber. This movement is reinforced by product innovation, where hemp components are integrated not simply as novelty but as functional building blocks in bakery, beverages, and alternative proteins.
Second, regulatory clarity and certifications have progressed in many jurisdictions, which reduces transactional risk for manufacturers and retailers. Consequently, the value chain is seeing greater participation from established ingredient suppliers and food processors who bring scale, quality assurance, and formalized supply contracts. Third, distribution patterns are shifting: digital commerce has expanded accessibility while conventional retail channels refine private-label and branded assortments to reflect hemp’s mainstream potential. Finally, sustainability narratives and traceability expectations are prompting deeper investment in transparent sourcing and processing technologies. Taken together, these shifts create a landscape where strategic alignment across sourcing, R&D, and go-to-market execution becomes the primary determinant of competitive success.
An evidence-driven analysis of how 2025 tariff changes reshaped supply chains, sourcing decisions, pricing dynamics, and regulatory interactions across the value chain
The cumulative impact of tariff adjustments enacted in 2025 has reverberated across the hemp-based food value chain, prompting a recalibration of sourcing and pricing strategies. Trade policy shifts have increased the relative cost of certain imported hemp inputs and finished ingredients, which in turn intensified supplier negotiations, accelerated conversations about domestic cultivation capacity, and encouraged reformulation to optimize cost and functionality. As a result, many manufacturers responded by diversifying supplier bases, reshoring select processing steps, and accelerating long-term contracts to hedge against volatility.
At the same time, tariff-driven cost pressure amplified logistical friction. Importers faced longer lead times and higher landed costs, which stressed working capital and required closer coordination between procurement and finance teams. Regulatory interactions also played a role: tariffs combined with evolving phytocannabinoid compliance standards created complexity for cross-border shipments, necessitating more robust documentation and third-party testing to avoid seizure or delays. From a demand perspective, consumer sensitivity to retail pricing led some brands to absorb costs, while others repositioned toward premium, provenance-led narratives that justified price adjustments. Overall, the tariff changes in 2025 acted as an accelerant for structural adjustments-prompting investment in domestic supply chains, tighter quality controls, and strategic segmentation of SKUs between price-sensitive and value-focused channels.
A detailed set of segmentation insights that translate packaging, end-user profiles, sourcing attributes, channels, product types, and application dynamics into strategic priorities
Effective segmentation is foundational for companies seeking to translate hemp ingredient strengths into commercial outcomes, and this market’s structure lends itself to nuanced differentiation across packaging formats, end users, source attributes, distribution footprints, product types, and applications. Packaging choices vary from bulk shipments destined for industrial processors to retail-packaged formats crafted for end consumers; bulk can be further parsed into large-volume containers such as bulk bags and drums, while retail packaging encompasses consumer-facing vessels including bottles, sachets, and tubs. End-user segmentation separates the institutional dynamics of food service buyers from the faster-moving, brand-driven residential channel, each of which has distinct ordering patterns, quality expectations, and margin structures.
Source differentiation between conventional and organic cultivars informs procurement decisions and marketing claims, and it also affects certification and traceability requirements. Distribution channels map differently to customer journeys: convenience stores, online platforms, specialty stores, and supermarkets and hypermarkets each present unique assortment logics, promotional mechanics, and shelf life constraints. Product-type segmentation isolates functional applications and processing needs, with flour, oil, protein powder, and seeds carrying distinct handling and formulation characteristics. Finally, end-use applications reveal where hemp’s attributes create the most commercial lift, with opportunities in bakery and confectionery, beverages, dairy-alternative formulations, meat-alternative matrices, and snack innovation. Aligning commercial strategy to these layered segments helps firms prioritize investments in packaging design, certification pathways, channel mixes, and application-focused R&D.
Actionable regional insights that explain how regulatory regimes, cultivation capacity, and consumer channels create differentiated opportunities across global markets
Regional dynamics in the hemp-based food market vary significantly, driven by regulatory regimes, agricultural capacity, consumer preferences, and distribution infrastructure. In the Americas, a combination of expanding cultivation zones and a broad retail base supports a wide assortment of hemp-based ingredients and finished products, with strong interest in protein-rich formulations and dairy alternatives. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of regulatory approaches and consumer sophistication; certain European markets demand rigorous certification and traceability while other regions show accelerating interest tied to functional nutrition and sustainability narratives. Across Asia-Pacific, demand is shaped by population density, rapidly growing e-commerce channels, and a strong emphasis on functional and convenience-driven formats, which creates distinct opportunities for powdered formulations and beverage integration.
Transitionally, cross-regional trade flows reflect both opportunity and constraint: tariff regimes, phytocannabinoid regulations, and logistical networks influence where processing hubs emerge and how companies prioritize regional launches. Companies that succeed regionally tend to combine local regulatory expertise with adaptive supply chain models and product formats aligned to consumer rituals-whether that means single-serve sachets and ready-to-drink beverages in high-density urban markets or bulk oil and seed supply to regional food manufacturers. Understanding these regional nuances is critical for firms that plan to scale internationally while maintaining compliance and consumer relevance.
A focused corporate intelligence narrative that profiles competitive archetypes, operational differentiators, and strategic moves driving leadership in hemp-based food spaces
Leading organizations in the hemp-based food space demonstrate a range of strategic archetypes that inform competitive dynamics: vertically integrated cultivators that control genetics, cultivation, and initial processing; specialized ingredient processors who focus on refining oil, protein, and flour to meet food-grade specifications; consumer brands that prioritize formulation, packaging, and channel relationships; and retail and foodservice operators who adapt product assortments to local demand patterns. These company types frequently collaborate through partnerships, joint ventures, or supply agreements to blend capabilities across the value chain.
Market leaders emphasize robust quality systems, third-party verification, and transparent supply chain traceability to differentiate in an environment where provenance matters. Investment in R&D is also a common distinguishing factor: firms that introduce stable, palatable protein powders or neutral-flavor oils often gain a foothold with food manufacturers and formulators. Additionally, companies that develop flexible packaging solutions or that optimize ingredient yields via processing innovations can materially improve unit economics. From a go-to-market perspective, effective players align distinct SKUs to channel requirements-tailoring pack sizes and shelf-stable formats for convenience and supermarkets while offering bulk containers and clinical-grade materials to industrial customers. These insights reveal that competitive advantage emerges from the integration of quality assurance, application-focused innovation, and channel-specific commercialization strategies.
A prioritized and practical set of actionable recommendations that align supply resilience, formulation innovation, certification, and channel strategies for rapid advantage
Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic, actionable moves to capture value while managing near-term uncertainty. First, prioritize supply chain resilience by diversifying sourcing across geographies and by developing contingency plans that include domestic processing partners and multiple logistics providers. Second, allocate R&D resources to formulation work that reduces sensory trade-offs and improves functional performance, thereby increasing the range of viable applications in bakery, beverages, dairy alternatives, meat alternatives, and snacks. Third, invest in certification and traceability systems that meet retailer and consumer expectations; this includes establishing robust testing regimes and maintaining clear chain-of-custody documentation.
Fourth, adopt channel-specific commercial strategies: design retail-packaged SKUs with clear on-shelf storytelling for supermarkets and specialty stores, while engineering cost-optimized bulk formats for foodservice and industrial customers. Fifth, reassess pricing and contractual terms in light of evolving tariff and trade risk, using longer-term purchase agreements and cost escalation clauses where appropriate. Sixth, develop targeted marketing narratives that emphasize nutritional benefits and sustainability credentials while avoiding unverified claims. Finally, pursue strategic partnerships-whether for co-manufacturing, ingredient licensing, or distribution-to scale quickly without overextending capital. By implementing these actions, organizations can move from reactive risk management to proactive value creation and differentiated market positioning.
A transparent description of the mixed-methods research framework that ensured triangulated insights across primary interviews, trade data, regulatory review, and scenario analysis
The research approach underpinning these insights combined multidisciplinary methods to ensure robustness, triangulation, and practical relevance. Primary qualitative interviews were conducted with stakeholders across cultivation, processing, retail, and foodservice to capture operational realities, product development constraints, and procurement behaviors. Secondary sources included regulatory databases, trade flow records, and peer-reviewed literature to validate compliance trends and ingredient functionalities. Trade and logistics data were cross-checked with shipment manifests and customs documentation to identify tariff impacts and shifting trade corridors.
Analytical rigor was reinforced through scenario analysis examining supply disruption outcomes, cost pass-through sensitivities, and channel-specific adoption pathways. Data quality controls included cross-validation of interview findings with third-party testing protocols and reconciliation between supply-side inputs and observed retail assortments. Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on ensuring that conclusions were practical and actionable for commercial teams-linking technical ingredient characteristics to real-world product development and distribution strategies. This mixed-methods framework provided the foundation for the strategic recommendations and segmentation insights presented herein.
A conclusive synthesis that underscores the strategic imperatives for companies seeking sustainable growth and durable advantage in hemp-based food markets
In conclusion, the hemp-based food sector presents a compelling combination of functional nutrition, sustainable positioning, and product innovation opportunities, but realizing potential requires coordinated execution across sourcing, R&D, certification, and channel alignment. The interplay of tariff shifts, regulatory developments, and changing consumer expectations has accelerated structural adjustments, making it essential for firms to act decisively. Those who integrate traceable supply chains, invest in application-focused formulation, and adopt channel-differentiated commercialization will be better positioned to capture enduring value.
As the sector evolves, success will depend on balancing agility with discipline: agile experimentation in product formats and partnerships must be matched by disciplined quality systems and contractual structures that mitigate trade and compliance risks. Ultimately, organizations that embed hemp-based ingredients into coherent innovation pipelines and that align their operations to regional regulatory realities and distribution logics will find the most sustainable pathways to growth and differentiation.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative introduction that frames hemp-based food ingredients as a strategic growth vector amid changing consumer preferences and supply chain dynamics
The hemp-based food sector is now at an inflection point where ingredient versatility, nutritional positioning, and consumer curiosity converge to create tangible market momentum. Hemp-derived products have advanced beyond niche interest into mainstream product development, driven by clear protein and oil profiles, fiber advantages, and a growing roster of regulatory clarifications that make commercialization more practicable. As a consequence, product developers, ingredient suppliers, and retailers are recalibrating portfolios to integrate hemp flour, oil, protein powders, and seeds across a wide set of applications.
In this environment, agility across the value chain matters. Sourcing strategies now prioritize traceability, consistent cannabinoid profiles, and certifications that resonate with health-conscious consumers. At the same time, R&D teams are leveraging hemp’s functional attributes to create differentiated bakery, beverage, dairy-alternative, meat-alternative, and snack offerings. Transitional pressures are apparent: supply chain constraints, evolving tariff and trade dynamics, and heightened scrutiny on labeling create near-term complexity but also open windows for first movers who can align quality, transparency, and commercial reach. This report frames those tensions, highlights the practical implications for decision-makers, and situates hemp-based foods within a broader trajectory of plant-based ingredient adoption.
A clear exposition of the major transformative shifts reshaping hemp-based food development, supply chains, and commercial routes to consumers
The hemp-based food landscape has experienced several transformative shifts that now set the stage for the next phase of growth and consolidation. First, consumer demand has matured from curiosity-driven trials to more sustained adoption based on functional benefits such as protein content, omega fatty acids, and fiber. This movement is reinforced by product innovation, where hemp components are integrated not simply as novelty but as functional building blocks in bakery, beverages, and alternative proteins.
Second, regulatory clarity and certifications have progressed in many jurisdictions, which reduces transactional risk for manufacturers and retailers. Consequently, the value chain is seeing greater participation from established ingredient suppliers and food processors who bring scale, quality assurance, and formalized supply contracts. Third, distribution patterns are shifting: digital commerce has expanded accessibility while conventional retail channels refine private-label and branded assortments to reflect hemp’s mainstream potential. Finally, sustainability narratives and traceability expectations are prompting deeper investment in transparent sourcing and processing technologies. Taken together, these shifts create a landscape where strategic alignment across sourcing, R&D, and go-to-market execution becomes the primary determinant of competitive success.
An evidence-driven analysis of how 2025 tariff changes reshaped supply chains, sourcing decisions, pricing dynamics, and regulatory interactions across the value chain
The cumulative impact of tariff adjustments enacted in 2025 has reverberated across the hemp-based food value chain, prompting a recalibration of sourcing and pricing strategies. Trade policy shifts have increased the relative cost of certain imported hemp inputs and finished ingredients, which in turn intensified supplier negotiations, accelerated conversations about domestic cultivation capacity, and encouraged reformulation to optimize cost and functionality. As a result, many manufacturers responded by diversifying supplier bases, reshoring select processing steps, and accelerating long-term contracts to hedge against volatility.
At the same time, tariff-driven cost pressure amplified logistical friction. Importers faced longer lead times and higher landed costs, which stressed working capital and required closer coordination between procurement and finance teams. Regulatory interactions also played a role: tariffs combined with evolving phytocannabinoid compliance standards created complexity for cross-border shipments, necessitating more robust documentation and third-party testing to avoid seizure or delays. From a demand perspective, consumer sensitivity to retail pricing led some brands to absorb costs, while others repositioned toward premium, provenance-led narratives that justified price adjustments. Overall, the tariff changes in 2025 acted as an accelerant for structural adjustments-prompting investment in domestic supply chains, tighter quality controls, and strategic segmentation of SKUs between price-sensitive and value-focused channels.
A detailed set of segmentation insights that translate packaging, end-user profiles, sourcing attributes, channels, product types, and application dynamics into strategic priorities
Effective segmentation is foundational for companies seeking to translate hemp ingredient strengths into commercial outcomes, and this market’s structure lends itself to nuanced differentiation across packaging formats, end users, source attributes, distribution footprints, product types, and applications. Packaging choices vary from bulk shipments destined for industrial processors to retail-packaged formats crafted for end consumers; bulk can be further parsed into large-volume containers such as bulk bags and drums, while retail packaging encompasses consumer-facing vessels including bottles, sachets, and tubs. End-user segmentation separates the institutional dynamics of food service buyers from the faster-moving, brand-driven residential channel, each of which has distinct ordering patterns, quality expectations, and margin structures.
Source differentiation between conventional and organic cultivars informs procurement decisions and marketing claims, and it also affects certification and traceability requirements. Distribution channels map differently to customer journeys: convenience stores, online platforms, specialty stores, and supermarkets and hypermarkets each present unique assortment logics, promotional mechanics, and shelf life constraints. Product-type segmentation isolates functional applications and processing needs, with flour, oil, protein powder, and seeds carrying distinct handling and formulation characteristics. Finally, end-use applications reveal where hemp’s attributes create the most commercial lift, with opportunities in bakery and confectionery, beverages, dairy-alternative formulations, meat-alternative matrices, and snack innovation. Aligning commercial strategy to these layered segments helps firms prioritize investments in packaging design, certification pathways, channel mixes, and application-focused R&D.
Actionable regional insights that explain how regulatory regimes, cultivation capacity, and consumer channels create differentiated opportunities across global markets
Regional dynamics in the hemp-based food market vary significantly, driven by regulatory regimes, agricultural capacity, consumer preferences, and distribution infrastructure. In the Americas, a combination of expanding cultivation zones and a broad retail base supports a wide assortment of hemp-based ingredients and finished products, with strong interest in protein-rich formulations and dairy alternatives. In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of regulatory approaches and consumer sophistication; certain European markets demand rigorous certification and traceability while other regions show accelerating interest tied to functional nutrition and sustainability narratives. Across Asia-Pacific, demand is shaped by population density, rapidly growing e-commerce channels, and a strong emphasis on functional and convenience-driven formats, which creates distinct opportunities for powdered formulations and beverage integration.
Transitionally, cross-regional trade flows reflect both opportunity and constraint: tariff regimes, phytocannabinoid regulations, and logistical networks influence where processing hubs emerge and how companies prioritize regional launches. Companies that succeed regionally tend to combine local regulatory expertise with adaptive supply chain models and product formats aligned to consumer rituals-whether that means single-serve sachets and ready-to-drink beverages in high-density urban markets or bulk oil and seed supply to regional food manufacturers. Understanding these regional nuances is critical for firms that plan to scale internationally while maintaining compliance and consumer relevance.
A focused corporate intelligence narrative that profiles competitive archetypes, operational differentiators, and strategic moves driving leadership in hemp-based food spaces
Leading organizations in the hemp-based food space demonstrate a range of strategic archetypes that inform competitive dynamics: vertically integrated cultivators that control genetics, cultivation, and initial processing; specialized ingredient processors who focus on refining oil, protein, and flour to meet food-grade specifications; consumer brands that prioritize formulation, packaging, and channel relationships; and retail and foodservice operators who adapt product assortments to local demand patterns. These company types frequently collaborate through partnerships, joint ventures, or supply agreements to blend capabilities across the value chain.
Market leaders emphasize robust quality systems, third-party verification, and transparent supply chain traceability to differentiate in an environment where provenance matters. Investment in R&D is also a common distinguishing factor: firms that introduce stable, palatable protein powders or neutral-flavor oils often gain a foothold with food manufacturers and formulators. Additionally, companies that develop flexible packaging solutions or that optimize ingredient yields via processing innovations can materially improve unit economics. From a go-to-market perspective, effective players align distinct SKUs to channel requirements-tailoring pack sizes and shelf-stable formats for convenience and supermarkets while offering bulk containers and clinical-grade materials to industrial customers. These insights reveal that competitive advantage emerges from the integration of quality assurance, application-focused innovation, and channel-specific commercialization strategies.
A prioritized and practical set of actionable recommendations that align supply resilience, formulation innovation, certification, and channel strategies for rapid advantage
Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic, actionable moves to capture value while managing near-term uncertainty. First, prioritize supply chain resilience by diversifying sourcing across geographies and by developing contingency plans that include domestic processing partners and multiple logistics providers. Second, allocate R&D resources to formulation work that reduces sensory trade-offs and improves functional performance, thereby increasing the range of viable applications in bakery, beverages, dairy alternatives, meat alternatives, and snacks. Third, invest in certification and traceability systems that meet retailer and consumer expectations; this includes establishing robust testing regimes and maintaining clear chain-of-custody documentation.
Fourth, adopt channel-specific commercial strategies: design retail-packaged SKUs with clear on-shelf storytelling for supermarkets and specialty stores, while engineering cost-optimized bulk formats for foodservice and industrial customers. Fifth, reassess pricing and contractual terms in light of evolving tariff and trade risk, using longer-term purchase agreements and cost escalation clauses where appropriate. Sixth, develop targeted marketing narratives that emphasize nutritional benefits and sustainability credentials while avoiding unverified claims. Finally, pursue strategic partnerships-whether for co-manufacturing, ingredient licensing, or distribution-to scale quickly without overextending capital. By implementing these actions, organizations can move from reactive risk management to proactive value creation and differentiated market positioning.
A transparent description of the mixed-methods research framework that ensured triangulated insights across primary interviews, trade data, regulatory review, and scenario analysis
The research approach underpinning these insights combined multidisciplinary methods to ensure robustness, triangulation, and practical relevance. Primary qualitative interviews were conducted with stakeholders across cultivation, processing, retail, and foodservice to capture operational realities, product development constraints, and procurement behaviors. Secondary sources included regulatory databases, trade flow records, and peer-reviewed literature to validate compliance trends and ingredient functionalities. Trade and logistics data were cross-checked with shipment manifests and customs documentation to identify tariff impacts and shifting trade corridors.
Analytical rigor was reinforced through scenario analysis examining supply disruption outcomes, cost pass-through sensitivities, and channel-specific adoption pathways. Data quality controls included cross-validation of interview findings with third-party testing protocols and reconciliation between supply-side inputs and observed retail assortments. Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on ensuring that conclusions were practical and actionable for commercial teams-linking technical ingredient characteristics to real-world product development and distribution strategies. This mixed-methods framework provided the foundation for the strategic recommendations and segmentation insights presented herein.
A conclusive synthesis that underscores the strategic imperatives for companies seeking sustainable growth and durable advantage in hemp-based food markets
In conclusion, the hemp-based food sector presents a compelling combination of functional nutrition, sustainable positioning, and product innovation opportunities, but realizing potential requires coordinated execution across sourcing, R&D, certification, and channel alignment. The interplay of tariff shifts, regulatory developments, and changing consumer expectations has accelerated structural adjustments, making it essential for firms to act decisively. Those who integrate traceable supply chains, invest in application-focused formulation, and adopt channel-differentiated commercialization will be better positioned to capture enduring value.
As the sector evolves, success will depend on balancing agility with discipline: agile experimentation in product formats and partnerships must be matched by disciplined quality systems and contractual structures that mitigate trade and compliance risks. Ultimately, organizations that embed hemp-based ingredients into coherent innovation pipelines and that align their operations to regional regulatory realities and distribution logics will find the most sustainable pathways to growth and differentiation.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
180 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising demand for hemp protein isolate in sports nutrition and meal replacements drives innovation in formulation and labeling
- 5.2. Expansion of organic and non-GMO certified hemp snack bars targeting health-conscious millennial consumers
- 5.3. Integration of full-spectrum hemp seed oils in plant-based dairy alternatives to enhance nutritional profiles and flavor
- 5.4. Adoption of sustainable hemp sourcing and regenerative agricultural practices to meet eco-friendly consumer expectations
- 5.5. Regulatory harmonization challenges and evolving CBD thresholds impacting product launch timelines and market expansion
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Hemp-based Food Market, by Packaging
- 8.1. Bulk
- 8.1.1. Bulk Bags
- 8.1.2. Drums
- 8.2. Retail Packaged
- 8.2.1. Bottles
- 8.2.2. Sachets
- 8.2.3. Tubs
- 9. Hemp-based Food Market, by Source
- 9.1. Conventional
- 9.2. Organic
- 10. Hemp-based Food Market, by Product Type
- 10.1. Flour
- 10.2. Oil
- 10.3. Protein Powder
- 10.4. Seeds
- 11. Hemp-based Food Market, by Application
- 11.1. Bakery & Confectionery
- 11.2. Beverages
- 11.3. Dairy Alternatives
- 11.4. Meat Alternatives
- 11.5. Snacks
- 12. Hemp-based Food Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Convenience Stores
- 12.2. Online
- 12.3. Specialty Stores
- 12.4. Supermarkets Hypermarkets
- 13. Hemp-based Food Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Hemp-based Food Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Hemp-based Food Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Aurora Cannabis Inc.
- 16.3.2. Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods, Inc.
- 16.3.3. Canopy Growth Corporation
- 16.3.4. Charlotte's Web Holdings, Inc.
- 16.3.5. Cronos Group Inc.
- 16.3.6. CV Sciences, Inc.
- 16.3.7. Elixinol Global Ltd
- 16.3.8. Hemp Foods Australia Pty Ltd
- 16.3.9. Hemp, Inc.
- 16.3.10. HEXO Corp.
- 16.3.11. Isodiol International Inc.
- 16.3.12. Manitoba Harvest Quality Foods LLC
- 16.3.13. Nutiva, Inc.
- 16.3.14. Pure Hemp Technology Inc.
- 16.3.15. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
- 16.3.16. Tilray Brands, Inc.
- 16.3.17. VIVO Cannabis Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
