Glycol Market by Product Type (Diethylene Glycol, Ethylene Glycol, Triethylene Glycol), Source (Petrochemical, Bio-Based, Blended), Application, End-Use Industry, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Glycol Market was valued at USD 48.41 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 50.20 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.09%, reaching USD 72.02 billion by 2032.
Glycol industry primer covering technical fundamentals, supply chain drivers, regulatory trends, sustainability imperatives, and strategic priorities for leaders
The glycol sector occupies a central role across multiple industrial chains, bridging petrochemical feedstock conversion, polymer manufacture, cold-weather fluid formulation, and several specialty downstream applications. Understanding the technical characteristics of diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol is fundamental to assessing performance requirements, safety protocols, and end-use compatibility. Equally important are the logistical and regulatory constraints that govern raw material sourcing, transport of hazardous intermediates, and end-product labeling for cosmetics and pharmaceutical applications.
Against this backdrop, stakeholders face a confluence of drivers: evolving sustainability expectations that push toward recycled polyethylene terephthalate integration and lower-carbon production routes; regulatory regimes that are tightening chemical safety and import controls; and commercial pressures to optimize cost through procurement strategies and supply chain diversification. These forces influence not only capital allocation and plant operation priorities but also R&D focus areas such as low-temperature performance, impurity control for excipient use, and formulation adaptability for automotive and industrial coolants.
This introduction frames the analytical scope of the report, situates glycol within broader chemical value chains, and sets expectations for the strategic takeaways that follow. Readers will gain a clear orientation to the technical, operational, and strategic considerations that are shaping competitive positioning and investment choices across the value chain.
Transformative shifts reshaping glycol supply and demand driven by feedstock innovation, circularity advances, regulatory tightening, and digital supply chains
The glycol landscape is undergoing rapid transformation driven by technological, regulatory, and commercial inflection points. Advances in feedstock flexibility and process intensification are enabling producers to reduce energy intensity and broaden the range of acceptable inputs, which in turn affects sourcing strategies and capital planning. Concurrently, circularity initiatives are accelerating the integration of recycled polyethylene terephthalate feedstocks and chemical recycling pathways, altering demand compositions and introducing new quality control imperatives for downstream manufacturers.
Regulatory tightening on chemical safety, import controls, and product stewardship has raised the bar for compliance and traceability, prompting firms to invest in digital recordkeeping and enhanced supplier audits. At the same time, digital supply chain capabilities are reshaping procurement, enabling better visibility into inventory positioning, lead times, and logistics risk. These capabilities become differentiators as companies adapt to episodic trade disruptions, shifting consumer preferences for low-impact ingredients in cosmetics and personal care, and heightened expectations for transparency in pharmaceutical excipients.
Together, these shifts are prompting firms to rethink product portfolios, re-evaluate capital allocation toward retrofit projects, and pursue partnerships that accelerate innovation. The cumulative effect is a more resilient, sustainability-minded, and technically sophisticated industry where strategic agility is rewarded and legacy models of production and distribution are challenged.
Cumulative implications of United States tariffs on glycol value chains, pricing dynamics, sourcing strategies, and multinational procurement decisions
The introduction and escalation of tariffs by the United States have had complex, cascading effects on glycol supply chains and commercial behavior. Tariff-driven cost differentials alter sourcing incentives, leading some purchasers to pivot regional sourcing or to prioritize domestic suppliers when feasible. This reorientation affects supplier negotiations, push-pull inventory strategies, and the allocation of manufacturing throughput across facilities. For multinational producers, tariff measures complicate transfer pricing, contract negotiations, and long-term sourcing commitments.
Beyond immediate cost implications, tariffs influence investment calculus. Firms weigh the benefits of near-shoring or capacity reallocation against the operational frictions and capital required to shift production footprints. Companies with integrated downstream operations may adjust internal procurement patterns to buffer pricing volatility, while distributors and dealers reassess stocking policies to maintain service levels without eroding margins.
Logistics and administrative burdens also rise as customs processes and classification disputes create additional friction. Smaller buyers and niche formulators can be particularly exposed, facing margin pressure or disrupted supply continuity. In response, many organizations are enhancing contractual flexibility, diversifying supplier panels, and investing in scenario planning to preserve continuity. Ultimately, the cumulative impact of tariff actions is manifest not only in transactional adjustments but in strategic shifts around sourcing geography, inventory management, and supplier collaboration.
In-depth segmentation insights across product types, applications, end-use industries, and distribution channels revealing demand patterns and strategic priority
A nuanced understanding of segmentation is essential to prioritize investments and optimize product strategies. By product type, stakeholders must distinguish performance, regulatory, and safety profiles among diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol because each grade aligns with distinct formulation and downstream requirements; procurement teams and R&D groups should therefore align specifications and quality control procedures accordingly. When considering application segmentation, demand drivers differ substantially across antifreeze and coolant, cosmetic ingredient, deicing fluid, pharmaceutical excipient, and polyethylene terephthalate uses; within antifreeze and coolant, the split between automotive coolant and industrial coolant introduces divergent performance standards and certification pathways, while polyethylene terephthalate demand dynamics diverge between recycled PET and virgin PET inputs, necessitating different supply chain relationships and quality assurance regimes.
End-use industry segmentation further clarifies priorities: the automotive sector, which includes aftermarket and original equipment manufacturer channels, demands consistent batch quality and regulatory provenance; packaging applications split into bottles, films and sheets, and thermoforming, each imposing unique polymer grade and processing tolerances; pharmaceuticals and personal care require stringent impurity control and traceability; textile applications prioritize fiber performance and compatibility with finishing treatments. Distribution channel segmentation reveals operational nuances that affect market access and margin structures; direct sales relationships support bespoke contractual terms and close technical collaboration, distributor sales via dealers and wholesalers provide networked reach and inventory buffering, and online sales are increasingly important for smaller buyers seeking convenience and speed. Integrating these segmentation layers enables decision-makers to tailor product development, customer engagement, and channel strategies to the specific technical and commercial needs of each pathway.
Regional dynamics and strategic considerations across Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shaping supply chains, regulations, and investments
Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on feedstock access, regulatory risk profiles, and investment appetites. In the Americas, proximity to key petrochemical feedstocks, a sizable automotive sector, and a mature distribution network support integrated supply chains, while regional regulatory attention to chemical safety and trade measures can rapidly alter procurement calculus. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogenous landscape: Western European markets emphasize sustainability credentials and circularity initiatives, regulatory complexity is high, and producers encounter stringent product stewardship expectations; the Middle East combines advantaged feedstock availability with emerging downstream investment, and Africa introduces unique logistics and demand development considerations.
Asia-Pacific remains a critical region for production scale and demand growth in polyester and textile segments, with significant domestic manufacturing capacity, evolving regulatory environments, and differentiated consumer preferences that shape formulation standards. Cross-regional interactions, including trade flows, investment partnerships, and technology transfer, create interdependencies that influence where producers choose to deploy capital and how buyers configure global sourcing. Understanding these geographic nuances supports better risk management, more effective regulatory engagement, and smarter investment allocation across facilities and value chain nodes.
Key company strategies, competitive positioning, M&A signals, and operational priorities among leading glycol producers and downstream integrators
Leading companies in the glycol ecosystem are deploying a blend of operational efficiency, portfolio differentiation, and collaborative innovation to sustain competitiveness. Strategic moves include targeted capital projects that improve feedstock flexibility, investments in process controls that enhance impurity management for excipient and pharmaceutical grades, and joint ventures that secure downstream feedstock demand for polyethylene terephthalate applications. Competitive positioning is also shaped by proprietary logistics networks and relationships with distributors, dealers, and wholesale partners that ensure consistent market access.
Mergers and acquisitions remain an important means to acquire technical capabilities, geographic reach, or downstream relationships, while partnerships with recyclers and chemical recyclers reflect a growing emphasis on circular feedstock integration. Companies that successfully communicate sustainability metrics and demonstrate transparent supply chain governance tend to gain preferential consideration from formulators in cosmetics and personal care as well as from brand owners in packaging. Operational priorities are increasingly centered on energy efficiency, emissions reduction, and digital monitoring of plant performance to reduce downtime and improve product consistency. Collectively, these strategic orientations inform where value is created across the value chain and which capabilities will determine competitive differentiation going forward.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to enhance resilience, decarbonize operations, optimize procurement, and capture value across glycol value chains
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic set of actions to enhance resilience and capture emerging opportunities. First, diversifying feedstock sourcing while investing in process flexibility reduces exposure to regional trade actions and feedstock price swings, and aligning procurement with quality specifications for diethylene, ethylene, or triethylene glycol mitigates formulation risk. Second, prioritizing circularity through partnerships with recyclers and investments in recycled PET integration strengthens sustainability credentials and opens new commercial pathways in packaging and textile end-uses. Third, upgrading digital capabilities across procurement, logistics, and plant operations improves visibility into lead times and inventory risk, enabling more responsive sourcing and production planning.
Additionally, companies should embed regulatory foresight into strategy, actively monitoring relevant chemical safety regulations and import controls to preempt compliance bottlenecks. Investing in R&D focused on impurity control and low-temperature performance will support growth in pharmaceutical excipients, cosmetics, and automotive coolant segments. Finally, building flexible commercial terms with distributors, dealers, and wholesalers, and offering technical support for formulators, can deepen customer relationships and preserve margins even when external cost pressures persist. These actions form an actionable roadmap that balances immediate resilience with medium-term transformation toward sustainability and operational excellence.
Research methodology overview detailing data collection, triangulation, stakeholder engagement, and analytical frameworks employed to ensure insight credibility
The research methodology combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure that conclusions are robust and actionable. Primary research included structured interviews with technical, commercial, and regulatory stakeholders across production, distribution, and end-use segments, enabling direct insight into operational priorities, certification needs, and purchasing behavior. Secondary sources were synthesized to provide context on technological trends, regulatory developments, and public sustainability initiatives, and findings were triangulated across multiple inputs to validate continuity and identify areas of divergence.
Analytical frameworks used scenario analysis and supply chain mapping to surface vulnerability points and opportunity nodes, while product-level specification reviews clarified performance differentials among diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol grades. Quality control and validation protocols included cross-checks with industry experts and iterative review cycles to ensure interpretive rigor. Where applicable, the methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions and a clear delineation between observed behavior and strategic intent, providing readers with a defensible basis for decision-making and further customized investigation.
Conclusion synthesizing implications for regulators, investors, and industry navigating technical, regulatory, and sustainability imperatives shaping the glycol sector
The conclusion synthesizes the strategic implications that flow from technical, regulatory, and commercial trends in the glycol sector. Producers and suppliers must reconcile short-term operating resilience with longer-term investments in sustainability and process adaptability, while buyers should optimize procurement strategies to balance cost, quality, and supply continuity. Regulators and standard-setting bodies will continue to influence product formulation and labeling practices, particularly in pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications where impurity control and traceability are non-negotiable. Investors and corporate strategists face the task of identifying opportunities that are resilient to trade friction and that benefit from circularity and digital supply chain enhancements.
Cross-cutting themes include the rising importance of recycled feedstocks for polyethylene terephthalate applications, the need for strengthened quality controls for excipient and cosmetic uses, and the competitive advantage conferred by integrated logistics and distributor networks. Organizations that proactively align technical capabilities, regulatory preparedness, and commercial flexibility will be best positioned to navigate disruption and to capitalize on shifting demand patterns. The sector’s evolution will reward those who combine operational discipline with strategic foresight.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Glycol industry primer covering technical fundamentals, supply chain drivers, regulatory trends, sustainability imperatives, and strategic priorities for leaders
The glycol sector occupies a central role across multiple industrial chains, bridging petrochemical feedstock conversion, polymer manufacture, cold-weather fluid formulation, and several specialty downstream applications. Understanding the technical characteristics of diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol is fundamental to assessing performance requirements, safety protocols, and end-use compatibility. Equally important are the logistical and regulatory constraints that govern raw material sourcing, transport of hazardous intermediates, and end-product labeling for cosmetics and pharmaceutical applications.
Against this backdrop, stakeholders face a confluence of drivers: evolving sustainability expectations that push toward recycled polyethylene terephthalate integration and lower-carbon production routes; regulatory regimes that are tightening chemical safety and import controls; and commercial pressures to optimize cost through procurement strategies and supply chain diversification. These forces influence not only capital allocation and plant operation priorities but also R&D focus areas such as low-temperature performance, impurity control for excipient use, and formulation adaptability for automotive and industrial coolants.
This introduction frames the analytical scope of the report, situates glycol within broader chemical value chains, and sets expectations for the strategic takeaways that follow. Readers will gain a clear orientation to the technical, operational, and strategic considerations that are shaping competitive positioning and investment choices across the value chain.
Transformative shifts reshaping glycol supply and demand driven by feedstock innovation, circularity advances, regulatory tightening, and digital supply chains
The glycol landscape is undergoing rapid transformation driven by technological, regulatory, and commercial inflection points. Advances in feedstock flexibility and process intensification are enabling producers to reduce energy intensity and broaden the range of acceptable inputs, which in turn affects sourcing strategies and capital planning. Concurrently, circularity initiatives are accelerating the integration of recycled polyethylene terephthalate feedstocks and chemical recycling pathways, altering demand compositions and introducing new quality control imperatives for downstream manufacturers.
Regulatory tightening on chemical safety, import controls, and product stewardship has raised the bar for compliance and traceability, prompting firms to invest in digital recordkeeping and enhanced supplier audits. At the same time, digital supply chain capabilities are reshaping procurement, enabling better visibility into inventory positioning, lead times, and logistics risk. These capabilities become differentiators as companies adapt to episodic trade disruptions, shifting consumer preferences for low-impact ingredients in cosmetics and personal care, and heightened expectations for transparency in pharmaceutical excipients.
Together, these shifts are prompting firms to rethink product portfolios, re-evaluate capital allocation toward retrofit projects, and pursue partnerships that accelerate innovation. The cumulative effect is a more resilient, sustainability-minded, and technically sophisticated industry where strategic agility is rewarded and legacy models of production and distribution are challenged.
Cumulative implications of United States tariffs on glycol value chains, pricing dynamics, sourcing strategies, and multinational procurement decisions
The introduction and escalation of tariffs by the United States have had complex, cascading effects on glycol supply chains and commercial behavior. Tariff-driven cost differentials alter sourcing incentives, leading some purchasers to pivot regional sourcing or to prioritize domestic suppliers when feasible. This reorientation affects supplier negotiations, push-pull inventory strategies, and the allocation of manufacturing throughput across facilities. For multinational producers, tariff measures complicate transfer pricing, contract negotiations, and long-term sourcing commitments.
Beyond immediate cost implications, tariffs influence investment calculus. Firms weigh the benefits of near-shoring or capacity reallocation against the operational frictions and capital required to shift production footprints. Companies with integrated downstream operations may adjust internal procurement patterns to buffer pricing volatility, while distributors and dealers reassess stocking policies to maintain service levels without eroding margins.
Logistics and administrative burdens also rise as customs processes and classification disputes create additional friction. Smaller buyers and niche formulators can be particularly exposed, facing margin pressure or disrupted supply continuity. In response, many organizations are enhancing contractual flexibility, diversifying supplier panels, and investing in scenario planning to preserve continuity. Ultimately, the cumulative impact of tariff actions is manifest not only in transactional adjustments but in strategic shifts around sourcing geography, inventory management, and supplier collaboration.
In-depth segmentation insights across product types, applications, end-use industries, and distribution channels revealing demand patterns and strategic priority
A nuanced understanding of segmentation is essential to prioritize investments and optimize product strategies. By product type, stakeholders must distinguish performance, regulatory, and safety profiles among diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol because each grade aligns with distinct formulation and downstream requirements; procurement teams and R&D groups should therefore align specifications and quality control procedures accordingly. When considering application segmentation, demand drivers differ substantially across antifreeze and coolant, cosmetic ingredient, deicing fluid, pharmaceutical excipient, and polyethylene terephthalate uses; within antifreeze and coolant, the split between automotive coolant and industrial coolant introduces divergent performance standards and certification pathways, while polyethylene terephthalate demand dynamics diverge between recycled PET and virgin PET inputs, necessitating different supply chain relationships and quality assurance regimes.
End-use industry segmentation further clarifies priorities: the automotive sector, which includes aftermarket and original equipment manufacturer channels, demands consistent batch quality and regulatory provenance; packaging applications split into bottles, films and sheets, and thermoforming, each imposing unique polymer grade and processing tolerances; pharmaceuticals and personal care require stringent impurity control and traceability; textile applications prioritize fiber performance and compatibility with finishing treatments. Distribution channel segmentation reveals operational nuances that affect market access and margin structures; direct sales relationships support bespoke contractual terms and close technical collaboration, distributor sales via dealers and wholesalers provide networked reach and inventory buffering, and online sales are increasingly important for smaller buyers seeking convenience and speed. Integrating these segmentation layers enables decision-makers to tailor product development, customer engagement, and channel strategies to the specific technical and commercial needs of each pathway.
Regional dynamics and strategic considerations across Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shaping supply chains, regulations, and investments
Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on feedstock access, regulatory risk profiles, and investment appetites. In the Americas, proximity to key petrochemical feedstocks, a sizable automotive sector, and a mature distribution network support integrated supply chains, while regional regulatory attention to chemical safety and trade measures can rapidly alter procurement calculus. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogenous landscape: Western European markets emphasize sustainability credentials and circularity initiatives, regulatory complexity is high, and producers encounter stringent product stewardship expectations; the Middle East combines advantaged feedstock availability with emerging downstream investment, and Africa introduces unique logistics and demand development considerations.
Asia-Pacific remains a critical region for production scale and demand growth in polyester and textile segments, with significant domestic manufacturing capacity, evolving regulatory environments, and differentiated consumer preferences that shape formulation standards. Cross-regional interactions, including trade flows, investment partnerships, and technology transfer, create interdependencies that influence where producers choose to deploy capital and how buyers configure global sourcing. Understanding these geographic nuances supports better risk management, more effective regulatory engagement, and smarter investment allocation across facilities and value chain nodes.
Key company strategies, competitive positioning, M&A signals, and operational priorities among leading glycol producers and downstream integrators
Leading companies in the glycol ecosystem are deploying a blend of operational efficiency, portfolio differentiation, and collaborative innovation to sustain competitiveness. Strategic moves include targeted capital projects that improve feedstock flexibility, investments in process controls that enhance impurity management for excipient and pharmaceutical grades, and joint ventures that secure downstream feedstock demand for polyethylene terephthalate applications. Competitive positioning is also shaped by proprietary logistics networks and relationships with distributors, dealers, and wholesale partners that ensure consistent market access.
Mergers and acquisitions remain an important means to acquire technical capabilities, geographic reach, or downstream relationships, while partnerships with recyclers and chemical recyclers reflect a growing emphasis on circular feedstock integration. Companies that successfully communicate sustainability metrics and demonstrate transparent supply chain governance tend to gain preferential consideration from formulators in cosmetics and personal care as well as from brand owners in packaging. Operational priorities are increasingly centered on energy efficiency, emissions reduction, and digital monitoring of plant performance to reduce downtime and improve product consistency. Collectively, these strategic orientations inform where value is created across the value chain and which capabilities will determine competitive differentiation going forward.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to enhance resilience, decarbonize operations, optimize procurement, and capture value across glycol value chains
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic set of actions to enhance resilience and capture emerging opportunities. First, diversifying feedstock sourcing while investing in process flexibility reduces exposure to regional trade actions and feedstock price swings, and aligning procurement with quality specifications for diethylene, ethylene, or triethylene glycol mitigates formulation risk. Second, prioritizing circularity through partnerships with recyclers and investments in recycled PET integration strengthens sustainability credentials and opens new commercial pathways in packaging and textile end-uses. Third, upgrading digital capabilities across procurement, logistics, and plant operations improves visibility into lead times and inventory risk, enabling more responsive sourcing and production planning.
Additionally, companies should embed regulatory foresight into strategy, actively monitoring relevant chemical safety regulations and import controls to preempt compliance bottlenecks. Investing in R&D focused on impurity control and low-temperature performance will support growth in pharmaceutical excipients, cosmetics, and automotive coolant segments. Finally, building flexible commercial terms with distributors, dealers, and wholesalers, and offering technical support for formulators, can deepen customer relationships and preserve margins even when external cost pressures persist. These actions form an actionable roadmap that balances immediate resilience with medium-term transformation toward sustainability and operational excellence.
Research methodology overview detailing data collection, triangulation, stakeholder engagement, and analytical frameworks employed to ensure insight credibility
The research methodology combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure that conclusions are robust and actionable. Primary research included structured interviews with technical, commercial, and regulatory stakeholders across production, distribution, and end-use segments, enabling direct insight into operational priorities, certification needs, and purchasing behavior. Secondary sources were synthesized to provide context on technological trends, regulatory developments, and public sustainability initiatives, and findings were triangulated across multiple inputs to validate continuity and identify areas of divergence.
Analytical frameworks used scenario analysis and supply chain mapping to surface vulnerability points and opportunity nodes, while product-level specification reviews clarified performance differentials among diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol grades. Quality control and validation protocols included cross-checks with industry experts and iterative review cycles to ensure interpretive rigor. Where applicable, the methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions and a clear delineation between observed behavior and strategic intent, providing readers with a defensible basis for decision-making and further customized investigation.
Conclusion synthesizing implications for regulators, investors, and industry navigating technical, regulatory, and sustainability imperatives shaping the glycol sector
The conclusion synthesizes the strategic implications that flow from technical, regulatory, and commercial trends in the glycol sector. Producers and suppliers must reconcile short-term operating resilience with longer-term investments in sustainability and process adaptability, while buyers should optimize procurement strategies to balance cost, quality, and supply continuity. Regulators and standard-setting bodies will continue to influence product formulation and labeling practices, particularly in pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications where impurity control and traceability are non-negotiable. Investors and corporate strategists face the task of identifying opportunities that are resilient to trade friction and that benefit from circularity and digital supply chain enhancements.
Cross-cutting themes include the rising importance of recycled feedstocks for polyethylene terephthalate applications, the need for strengthened quality controls for excipient and cosmetic uses, and the competitive advantage conferred by integrated logistics and distributor networks. Organizations that proactively align technical capabilities, regulatory preparedness, and commercial flexibility will be best positioned to navigate disruption and to capitalize on shifting demand patterns. The sector’s evolution will reward those who combine operational discipline with strategic foresight.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing adoption of bio-based glycols from corn-derived feedstocks to meet sustainability targets
- 5.2. Rising demand for high-purity ethylene glycol in battery coolants for electric vehicles
- 5.3. Integration of advanced glycol recycling technologies to reduce industrial wastewater footprints
- 5.4. Regulatory pressures driving shift toward propylene glycol formulations in consumer cosmetics
- 5.5. Surge in demand for monoethylene glycol as a feedstock for sustainable polyester fiber production
- 5.6. Expansion of glycol-based antifreeze solutions tailored for extreme temperature climate regions
- 5.7. Collaborations between chemical manufacturers and startups for novel glycol derivative innovations
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Glycol Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Diethylene Glycol
- 8.2. Ethylene Glycol
- 8.3. Triethylene Glycol
- 9. Glycol Market, by Source
- 9.1. Petrochemical
- 9.1.1. Naphtha-Based Cracker Feedstock
- 9.1.2. Ethane And Propane-Based Cracker Feedstock
- 9.2. Bio-Based
- 9.2.1. Glycerin Route
- 9.2.2. Sugar And Starch Route
- 9.2.3. Lignocellulosic Biomass Route
- 9.3. Blended
- 10. Glycol Market, by Application
- 10.1. Antifreeze And Coolant
- 10.1.1. Automotive Coolant
- 10.1.2. Industrial Coolant
- 10.2. Cosmetic Ingredient
- 10.3. Deicing Fluid
- 10.4. Pharmaceutical Excipient
- 10.5. Polyethylene Terephthalate
- 10.5.1. Recycled Pet
- 10.5.2. Virgin Pet
- 11. Glycol Market, by End-Use Industry
- 11.1. Automotive
- 11.2. Packaging
- 11.3. Pharmaceuticals And Personal Care
- 12. Glycol Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Direct Sales
- 12.2. Distributor Sales
- 12.2.1. Dealers
- 12.2.2. Wholesalers
- 12.3. Online Sales
- 13. Glycol Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Glycol Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Glycol Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
- 16.3.2. BASF SE
- 16.3.3. Cargill, Incorporated
- 16.3.4. China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation
- 16.3.5. Dow Inc.
- 16.3.6. Eastman Chemical Company
- 16.3.7. EQUATE Petrochemical Company
- 16.3.8. Exxon Mobil Corporation
- 16.3.9. Formosa Plastics Corporation
- 16.3.10. Global Bio-chem Technology Group Company Limited
- 16.3.11. Huntsman Corporation
- 16.3.12. India Glycols Limited
- 16.3.13. Indorama Ventures Public Company Limited
- 16.3.14. INEOS AG
- 16.3.15. LG Chem Ltd.
- 16.3.16. Lotte Chemical Corporation
- 16.3.17. LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
- 16.3.18. Manali Petrochemicals Limited
- 16.3.19. Mitsubishi Chemical Group Corporation
- 16.3.20. Oleon NV
- 16.3.21. PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited
- 16.3.22. Reliance Industries Limited
- 16.3.23. Repsol S.A.
- 16.3.24. Sasol Limited
- 16.3.25. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- 16.3.26. Shell Chemicals International B.V.
- 16.3.27. SKC Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.28. TotalEnergies SE
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
