Glycidyl Methacrylate Market by Type (Di Functional, Mono Functional), Application (Adhesives & Sealants, Coatings, Composites), End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Glycidyl Methacrylate Market was valued at USD 201.22 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 213.17 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.39%, reaching USD 330.30 million by 2032.
Introduction to Glycidyl Methacrylate and its pivotal role as a reactive monomer enabling improved adhesion, crosslink density, and formulation flexibility across industries
A concise introduction that frames Glycidyl Methacrylate as a versatile reactive monomer with strategic relevance across industrial value chains
Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) is a versatile epoxy-functional methacrylate monomer distinguished by its ability to impart reactive epoxy groups into polymer matrices and coatings. It functions as a coupling agent and reactive diluent, enabling crosslinking, adhesion promotion, and improved interfacial compatibility in polymer blends. Across production and formulation landscapes, GMA is valued for its capacity to enhance mechanical strength, chemical resistance, and adhesion without introducing large quantities of non-reactive diluents. Its reactivity enables lower-temperature cure chemistries and formulation flexibility that can reduce energy consumption during processing.
The industrial relevance of GMA spans adhesives, sealants, coatings, composites, and electronic chemicals, where it serves both as a functional monomer and a building block for copolymers and glycidyl-containing oligomers. Regulatory scrutiny of epoxy-functional chemistries continues to influence raw material selection and process design, prompting manufacturers to optimize formulations for worker safety and end-use compliance. Given ongoing transitions in mobility, construction, and electronics, GMA plays a facilitative role in enabling advanced material properties and manufacturing efficiencies, making it a focal point for product developers, procurement specialists, and regulatory affairs teams alike.
Evolving demand drivers, regulatory pressures, and supply chain adaptations that are redefining research, development, and sourcing strategies for Glycidyl Methacrylate
Transformative shifts shaping demand, regulation, and innovation for Glycidyl Methacrylate across materials and supply chains
The landscape for glycidyl methacrylate has been reshaped by converging dynamics: increased demand for high-performance adhesives and coatings, accelerated electrification in transportation, tighter regulatory oversight of epoxy and glycidyl-containing materials, and a more fragmented global supply chain. Formulators are prioritizing multifunctional chemistries that reduce process steps and energy intensity, propelling interest in monomers that deliver both reactive functionality and compatibility with greener solvent systems. As a result, product development is tilting toward low-VOC and UV-curable solutions where glycidyl methacrylate can provide the requisite reactivity while enabling faster cure times.
Simultaneously, customers across aerospace, automotive, construction, and electronics are seeking materials that balance performance with life-cycle considerations. This demand has intensified R&D efforts to produce glycidyl methacrylate-based copolymers that improve recyclability, reduce hazardous byproducts, and facilitate end-of-life recovery. Supply chain volatility has further catalyzed strategic purchasing patterns, with manufacturers increasing emphasis on supplier diversification, safety stock policies, and qualification of alternative feedstocks. Taken together, these shifts are prompting incumbents and new entrants to re-examine portfolio strategies, downstream partnerships, and technology roadmaps to capture evolving application requirements while managing regulatory and sustainability expectations.
Assessment of how 2025 tariff shifts in the United States have influenced procurement, reformulation, and supply chain resilience strategies across the value chain
Analysis of cumulative tariff impacts in the United States during 2025 and their operational consequences for producers, formulators, and buyers
Tariff actions introduced or adjusted in 2025 have had a measurable effect on input costs and procurement strategies for epoxy-functional monomers and related intermediates. Elevated duties on certain chemical intermediates and finished formulations have increased landed costs for import-dependent manufacturers and have prompted both suppliers and end users to reassess global sourcing footprints. The cumulative impact is evident in longer procurement lead times for specific grades, a heightened focus on tariff classification and origin documentation, and renewed interest in domestic or nearshored production capacity to mitigate exposure to trade policy volatility.
In response to these tariff dynamics, many firms have adopted tactical measures such as renegotiating supplier contracts to include tariff-sharing clauses, reallocating production across global sites to exploit preferential trade arrangements, and investing in greater forward purchasing where storage considerations permit. At the formulation level, some buyers have explored reformulation to leverage locally available intermediates or to substitute lower-duty chemistries while preserving product performance. From a commercial standpoint, tariff-driven cost increases have accelerated discussions with customers about price adjustments and product segmentation to protect margins. Overall, the 2025 tariff environment underscored the strategic importance of flexible supply chains, proactive regulatory monitoring, and agile procurement practices.
Application, end-user, and functionality-driven segmentation insights that determine formulation trade-offs, performance priorities, and commercial targeting strategies for Glycidyl Methacrylate
Key segmentation insights that reveal application-, end-user-, and type-specific performance attributes and commercial implications for Glycidyl Methacrylate
When viewed through the lens of application, glycidyl methacrylate is investigated across adhesives and sealants, coatings, composites, and electronic chemicals. Adhesives and sealants warrant a closer look as they further subdivide into sealants and structural adhesives, each demanding distinct balance of flexibility, cure speed, and bond strength. Coatings applications are differentiated between powder coatings and UV coatings, where the former benefits from GMA’s capacity to enhance crosslink density at elevated temperatures and the latter leverages its reactive functionality for rapid cure and improved adhesion on diverse substrates. In composites, glycidyl methacrylate contributes to matrix toughness and fiber-matrix adhesion, while in electronic chemicals it plays a role in formulations for potting compounds and printed circuit boards where dielectric properties and thermal stability are critical.
From an end-user perspective, primary markets include aerospace and defense, automotive, construction, and electronics. Automotive demand can be further dissected into commercial vehicles, electric vehicles, and passenger cars, with electrification amplifying requirements for thermally stable, flame-retardant, and electrically isolating materials. Construction applications split into commercial, industrial, and residential sectors, each prioritizing different performance and compliance vectors such as fire resistance, durability, or VOC limits. Electronics end users include potting compounds and printed circuit boards, where GMA-derived chemistries must meet stringent cleanliness, stability, and adhesion constraints. Regarding type differentiation, products are categorized as di-functional and mono-functional, a distinction that drives crosslink density, mechanical properties, and cure behavior; di-functional variants enable higher network density and stiffness, whereas mono-functional types are favored where flexibility or lower crosslinking is required. These segmentation perspectives inform product development priorities and help suppliers target formulation trade-offs to meet sector-specific performance and regulatory needs.
Regional analysis of how Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific dynamics are shaping production decisions, regulatory compliance, and commercial deployment of Glycidyl Methacrylate
Regional dynamics and performance differentials across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific that influence supply chains, regulatory compliance, and commercial opportunity for Glycidyl Methacrylate
Across the Americas, competitive advantage is increasingly tied to localized production and responsive supply chains that can meet the needs of automotive and electronics manufacturers concentrated in key industrial clusters. Regulatory frameworks and state-level incentives shape investment decisions in production capacity and specialty chemical manufacturing. Meanwhile, demand from construction and industrial coatings emphasizes durability and compliance with evolving environmental standards, encouraging formulators to prioritize low-VOC and high-performance curing systems.
In the Europe, Middle East & Africa region, regulatory rigor and sustainability mandates exert strong influence on material selection and product development. Manufacturers serving aerospace, defense, and high-value industrial sectors must navigate complex harmonized standards and demonstrate lifecycle performance, which in turn drives interest in advanced glycidyl methacrylate-based copolymers that support recyclability and reduced emissions. The Asia-Pacific region remains a significant center for both production and consumption, driven by extensive manufacturing footprints in electronics and automotive assembly. Rapid industrialization and capacity expansion in several Asia-Pacific markets continue to underpin demand for reactive monomers, while local regulatory evolution and increasing attention to worker safety and emissions are prompting suppliers to adapt labeling, handling, and formulation practices across the region.
Company-level observations on R&D focus, capacity strategies, and collaborative models that are redefining competitive advantage within the Glycidyl Methacrylate value chain
Strategic company-level observations highlighting innovation, capacity choices, and partnership models among leading participants in the Glycidyl Methacrylate ecosystem
Leading producers and specialty chemical formulators are differentiating through targeted investments in application development, capacity flexibility, and sustainable production practices. Companies with robust R&D footprints are focusing on tailor-made copolymers, performance additives, and resin systems that exploit GMA’s reactive epoxide functionality while addressing safety and environmental constraints. Partnerships between polymer producers, coating formulators, and OEMs are accelerating time-to-market for application-specific solutions, particularly in automotive electrification and advanced electronics where qualification processes are rigorous and performance windows narrow.
Operational strategies among prominent players include backward integration to secure feedstocks, modular capacity to respond to surges in demand, and multi-site manufacturing to minimize single-source risk. Commercially, alliances that combine supply security with technical support services-such as on-site formulation consultation and regulatory dossier management-are increasingly valued by buyers. Additionally, there is growing investment in pilot facilities and accelerated testing platforms to compress development cycles and validate substitution options that can reduce exposure to constrained intermediates or tariff-driven cost swings.
Practical strategic steps for manufacturers and suppliers to enhance supply chain resilience, accelerate formulation innovation, and align product portfolios with regulatory priorities
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen resilience, accelerate innovation, and align portfolios with evolving regulatory and customer demands
Proactive supply chain diversification is essential: firms should expand qualified supplier lists, evaluate dual-sourcing strategies for critical intermediates, and pursue nearshoring where feasible to reduce transit risk and tariff exposure. Investing in formulation flexibility by maintaining libraries of alternative chemistries and validation protocols will enable rapid substitution when regulatory or trade conditions change. Concurrently, integrating regulatory and sustainability considerations early in product design reduces downstream compliance costs and enhances market acceptability.
On the innovation front, companies should prioritize the development of glycidyl methacrylate-based systems that support low-temperature curing, UV-curing applications, and compatibility with recycled substrates. Strengthening technical partnerships with OEMs and system formulators can accelerate adoption cycles and ensure that product attributes align with real-world application needs. Finally, firms should enhance commercial transparency by clarifying total-cost-of-ownership implications for customers, offering formulation support packages, and structuring contracts to share or mitigate tariff risk. Taken together, these measures will help businesses protect margins, sustain growth in targeted end markets, and meet heightened expectations around safety and sustainability.
Transparent description of the primary and secondary research methods, expert validation, and triangulation techniques used to produce technically rigorous and operationally relevant insights
Research methodology describing how primary insights, secondary intelligence, and triangulation techniques were used to develop a robust understanding of Glycidyl Methacrylate dynamics
This analysis synthesizes a combination of primary qualitative interviews with industry practitioners, technical experts, and procurement leaders, supplemented by secondary technical literature, regulatory guidance, and trade documentation. Primary interviews were structured to elicit insights on formulation trends, qualification hurdles, and supply chain adaptations, ensuring representation from adhesive formulators, coating manufacturers, composite fabricators, and electronics material scientists. Secondary sources included peer-reviewed publications, regulatory filings, and publicly available technical datasheets to verify material properties, typical use-cases, and compliance pathways.
Data triangulation techniques were employed to cross-validate anecdotal evidence against documented regulatory developments and logistical indicators. The methodology emphasized transparency about assumptions and limitations, noting where proprietary or confidential supplier data limited granularity. Sensitivity checks were applied when interpreting impacts related to trade policy changes and regional regulatory shifts, and expert review rounds were used to refine interpretive conclusions. The resulting approach balances technical depth with practical relevance for decision-makers across R&D, supply chain, and commercial functions.
Concluding assessment of strategic priorities for stakeholders to convert glycidyl methacrylate technical advantages into compliant, resilient, and commercially viable solutions
Concluding observations that summarize the strategic implications for stakeholders engaged with Glycidyl Methacrylate and adjacent material systems
Glycidyl methacrylate occupies a strategic position within polymer and formulation portfolios due to its reactive epoxy functionality and capacity to enable enhanced adhesion, crosslink density, and processing flexibility. Stakeholders from product developers to procurement teams must navigate a landscape defined by regulatory tightening, evolving end-use requirements, and episodic trade disruptions. Success will depend on aligning material innovation with lifecycle and compliance objectives while building supply chain architectures that can respond to geopolitical and policy shifts.
Moving forward, organizations that combine technical investment in application-specific formulations with pragmatic sourcing and tariff-mitigation strategies will be best positioned to capture demand in high-growth segments such as electrified mobility and advanced electronics. Emphasizing cross-functional collaboration-bringing together R&D, regulatory affairs, and commercial teams-will accelerate qualification cycles and reduce time-to-adoption for novel GMA-enabled systems. Ultimately, the most resilient players will be those that translate scientific advantages into practical, compliant, and economically viable solutions for their customers.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Introduction to Glycidyl Methacrylate and its pivotal role as a reactive monomer enabling improved adhesion, crosslink density, and formulation flexibility across industries
A concise introduction that frames Glycidyl Methacrylate as a versatile reactive monomer with strategic relevance across industrial value chains
Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) is a versatile epoxy-functional methacrylate monomer distinguished by its ability to impart reactive epoxy groups into polymer matrices and coatings. It functions as a coupling agent and reactive diluent, enabling crosslinking, adhesion promotion, and improved interfacial compatibility in polymer blends. Across production and formulation landscapes, GMA is valued for its capacity to enhance mechanical strength, chemical resistance, and adhesion without introducing large quantities of non-reactive diluents. Its reactivity enables lower-temperature cure chemistries and formulation flexibility that can reduce energy consumption during processing.
The industrial relevance of GMA spans adhesives, sealants, coatings, composites, and electronic chemicals, where it serves both as a functional monomer and a building block for copolymers and glycidyl-containing oligomers. Regulatory scrutiny of epoxy-functional chemistries continues to influence raw material selection and process design, prompting manufacturers to optimize formulations for worker safety and end-use compliance. Given ongoing transitions in mobility, construction, and electronics, GMA plays a facilitative role in enabling advanced material properties and manufacturing efficiencies, making it a focal point for product developers, procurement specialists, and regulatory affairs teams alike.
Evolving demand drivers, regulatory pressures, and supply chain adaptations that are redefining research, development, and sourcing strategies for Glycidyl Methacrylate
Transformative shifts shaping demand, regulation, and innovation for Glycidyl Methacrylate across materials and supply chains
The landscape for glycidyl methacrylate has been reshaped by converging dynamics: increased demand for high-performance adhesives and coatings, accelerated electrification in transportation, tighter regulatory oversight of epoxy and glycidyl-containing materials, and a more fragmented global supply chain. Formulators are prioritizing multifunctional chemistries that reduce process steps and energy intensity, propelling interest in monomers that deliver both reactive functionality and compatibility with greener solvent systems. As a result, product development is tilting toward low-VOC and UV-curable solutions where glycidyl methacrylate can provide the requisite reactivity while enabling faster cure times.
Simultaneously, customers across aerospace, automotive, construction, and electronics are seeking materials that balance performance with life-cycle considerations. This demand has intensified R&D efforts to produce glycidyl methacrylate-based copolymers that improve recyclability, reduce hazardous byproducts, and facilitate end-of-life recovery. Supply chain volatility has further catalyzed strategic purchasing patterns, with manufacturers increasing emphasis on supplier diversification, safety stock policies, and qualification of alternative feedstocks. Taken together, these shifts are prompting incumbents and new entrants to re-examine portfolio strategies, downstream partnerships, and technology roadmaps to capture evolving application requirements while managing regulatory and sustainability expectations.
Assessment of how 2025 tariff shifts in the United States have influenced procurement, reformulation, and supply chain resilience strategies across the value chain
Analysis of cumulative tariff impacts in the United States during 2025 and their operational consequences for producers, formulators, and buyers
Tariff actions introduced or adjusted in 2025 have had a measurable effect on input costs and procurement strategies for epoxy-functional monomers and related intermediates. Elevated duties on certain chemical intermediates and finished formulations have increased landed costs for import-dependent manufacturers and have prompted both suppliers and end users to reassess global sourcing footprints. The cumulative impact is evident in longer procurement lead times for specific grades, a heightened focus on tariff classification and origin documentation, and renewed interest in domestic or nearshored production capacity to mitigate exposure to trade policy volatility.
In response to these tariff dynamics, many firms have adopted tactical measures such as renegotiating supplier contracts to include tariff-sharing clauses, reallocating production across global sites to exploit preferential trade arrangements, and investing in greater forward purchasing where storage considerations permit. At the formulation level, some buyers have explored reformulation to leverage locally available intermediates or to substitute lower-duty chemistries while preserving product performance. From a commercial standpoint, tariff-driven cost increases have accelerated discussions with customers about price adjustments and product segmentation to protect margins. Overall, the 2025 tariff environment underscored the strategic importance of flexible supply chains, proactive regulatory monitoring, and agile procurement practices.
Application, end-user, and functionality-driven segmentation insights that determine formulation trade-offs, performance priorities, and commercial targeting strategies for Glycidyl Methacrylate
Key segmentation insights that reveal application-, end-user-, and type-specific performance attributes and commercial implications for Glycidyl Methacrylate
When viewed through the lens of application, glycidyl methacrylate is investigated across adhesives and sealants, coatings, composites, and electronic chemicals. Adhesives and sealants warrant a closer look as they further subdivide into sealants and structural adhesives, each demanding distinct balance of flexibility, cure speed, and bond strength. Coatings applications are differentiated between powder coatings and UV coatings, where the former benefits from GMA’s capacity to enhance crosslink density at elevated temperatures and the latter leverages its reactive functionality for rapid cure and improved adhesion on diverse substrates. In composites, glycidyl methacrylate contributes to matrix toughness and fiber-matrix adhesion, while in electronic chemicals it plays a role in formulations for potting compounds and printed circuit boards where dielectric properties and thermal stability are critical.
From an end-user perspective, primary markets include aerospace and defense, automotive, construction, and electronics. Automotive demand can be further dissected into commercial vehicles, electric vehicles, and passenger cars, with electrification amplifying requirements for thermally stable, flame-retardant, and electrically isolating materials. Construction applications split into commercial, industrial, and residential sectors, each prioritizing different performance and compliance vectors such as fire resistance, durability, or VOC limits. Electronics end users include potting compounds and printed circuit boards, where GMA-derived chemistries must meet stringent cleanliness, stability, and adhesion constraints. Regarding type differentiation, products are categorized as di-functional and mono-functional, a distinction that drives crosslink density, mechanical properties, and cure behavior; di-functional variants enable higher network density and stiffness, whereas mono-functional types are favored where flexibility or lower crosslinking is required. These segmentation perspectives inform product development priorities and help suppliers target formulation trade-offs to meet sector-specific performance and regulatory needs.
Regional analysis of how Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific dynamics are shaping production decisions, regulatory compliance, and commercial deployment of Glycidyl Methacrylate
Regional dynamics and performance differentials across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific that influence supply chains, regulatory compliance, and commercial opportunity for Glycidyl Methacrylate
Across the Americas, competitive advantage is increasingly tied to localized production and responsive supply chains that can meet the needs of automotive and electronics manufacturers concentrated in key industrial clusters. Regulatory frameworks and state-level incentives shape investment decisions in production capacity and specialty chemical manufacturing. Meanwhile, demand from construction and industrial coatings emphasizes durability and compliance with evolving environmental standards, encouraging formulators to prioritize low-VOC and high-performance curing systems.
In the Europe, Middle East & Africa region, regulatory rigor and sustainability mandates exert strong influence on material selection and product development. Manufacturers serving aerospace, defense, and high-value industrial sectors must navigate complex harmonized standards and demonstrate lifecycle performance, which in turn drives interest in advanced glycidyl methacrylate-based copolymers that support recyclability and reduced emissions. The Asia-Pacific region remains a significant center for both production and consumption, driven by extensive manufacturing footprints in electronics and automotive assembly. Rapid industrialization and capacity expansion in several Asia-Pacific markets continue to underpin demand for reactive monomers, while local regulatory evolution and increasing attention to worker safety and emissions are prompting suppliers to adapt labeling, handling, and formulation practices across the region.
Company-level observations on R&D focus, capacity strategies, and collaborative models that are redefining competitive advantage within the Glycidyl Methacrylate value chain
Strategic company-level observations highlighting innovation, capacity choices, and partnership models among leading participants in the Glycidyl Methacrylate ecosystem
Leading producers and specialty chemical formulators are differentiating through targeted investments in application development, capacity flexibility, and sustainable production practices. Companies with robust R&D footprints are focusing on tailor-made copolymers, performance additives, and resin systems that exploit GMA’s reactive epoxide functionality while addressing safety and environmental constraints. Partnerships between polymer producers, coating formulators, and OEMs are accelerating time-to-market for application-specific solutions, particularly in automotive electrification and advanced electronics where qualification processes are rigorous and performance windows narrow.
Operational strategies among prominent players include backward integration to secure feedstocks, modular capacity to respond to surges in demand, and multi-site manufacturing to minimize single-source risk. Commercially, alliances that combine supply security with technical support services-such as on-site formulation consultation and regulatory dossier management-are increasingly valued by buyers. Additionally, there is growing investment in pilot facilities and accelerated testing platforms to compress development cycles and validate substitution options that can reduce exposure to constrained intermediates or tariff-driven cost swings.
Practical strategic steps for manufacturers and suppliers to enhance supply chain resilience, accelerate formulation innovation, and align product portfolios with regulatory priorities
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen resilience, accelerate innovation, and align portfolios with evolving regulatory and customer demands
Proactive supply chain diversification is essential: firms should expand qualified supplier lists, evaluate dual-sourcing strategies for critical intermediates, and pursue nearshoring where feasible to reduce transit risk and tariff exposure. Investing in formulation flexibility by maintaining libraries of alternative chemistries and validation protocols will enable rapid substitution when regulatory or trade conditions change. Concurrently, integrating regulatory and sustainability considerations early in product design reduces downstream compliance costs and enhances market acceptability.
On the innovation front, companies should prioritize the development of glycidyl methacrylate-based systems that support low-temperature curing, UV-curing applications, and compatibility with recycled substrates. Strengthening technical partnerships with OEMs and system formulators can accelerate adoption cycles and ensure that product attributes align with real-world application needs. Finally, firms should enhance commercial transparency by clarifying total-cost-of-ownership implications for customers, offering formulation support packages, and structuring contracts to share or mitigate tariff risk. Taken together, these measures will help businesses protect margins, sustain growth in targeted end markets, and meet heightened expectations around safety and sustainability.
Transparent description of the primary and secondary research methods, expert validation, and triangulation techniques used to produce technically rigorous and operationally relevant insights
Research methodology describing how primary insights, secondary intelligence, and triangulation techniques were used to develop a robust understanding of Glycidyl Methacrylate dynamics
This analysis synthesizes a combination of primary qualitative interviews with industry practitioners, technical experts, and procurement leaders, supplemented by secondary technical literature, regulatory guidance, and trade documentation. Primary interviews were structured to elicit insights on formulation trends, qualification hurdles, and supply chain adaptations, ensuring representation from adhesive formulators, coating manufacturers, composite fabricators, and electronics material scientists. Secondary sources included peer-reviewed publications, regulatory filings, and publicly available technical datasheets to verify material properties, typical use-cases, and compliance pathways.
Data triangulation techniques were employed to cross-validate anecdotal evidence against documented regulatory developments and logistical indicators. The methodology emphasized transparency about assumptions and limitations, noting where proprietary or confidential supplier data limited granularity. Sensitivity checks were applied when interpreting impacts related to trade policy changes and regional regulatory shifts, and expert review rounds were used to refine interpretive conclusions. The resulting approach balances technical depth with practical relevance for decision-makers across R&D, supply chain, and commercial functions.
Concluding assessment of strategic priorities for stakeholders to convert glycidyl methacrylate technical advantages into compliant, resilient, and commercially viable solutions
Concluding observations that summarize the strategic implications for stakeholders engaged with Glycidyl Methacrylate and adjacent material systems
Glycidyl methacrylate occupies a strategic position within polymer and formulation portfolios due to its reactive epoxy functionality and capacity to enable enhanced adhesion, crosslink density, and processing flexibility. Stakeholders from product developers to procurement teams must navigate a landscape defined by regulatory tightening, evolving end-use requirements, and episodic trade disruptions. Success will depend on aligning material innovation with lifecycle and compliance objectives while building supply chain architectures that can respond to geopolitical and policy shifts.
Moving forward, organizations that combine technical investment in application-specific formulations with pragmatic sourcing and tariff-mitigation strategies will be best positioned to capture demand in high-growth segments such as electrified mobility and advanced electronics. Emphasizing cross-functional collaboration-bringing together R&D, regulatory affairs, and commercial teams-will accelerate qualification cycles and reduce time-to-adoption for novel GMA-enabled systems. Ultimately, the most resilient players will be those that translate scientific advantages into practical, compliant, and economically viable solutions for their customers.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rapid adoption of bio-based glycidyl methacrylate monomers in eco-friendly coatings for automotive refinishing
- 5.2. Increasing integration of glycidyl methacrylate into UV-curable inks for sustainable flexible packaging applications
- 5.3. Innovation in glycidyl methacrylate-based dental adhesive formulations to improve bond strength and longevity
- 5.4. Development of glycidyl methacrylate functionalized resins for high-definition 3D printing of industrial components
- 5.5. Regulatory-driven shift towards low-VOC glycidyl methacrylate alternatives in consumer electronics coatings
- 5.6. Expansion of glycidyl methacrylate production capacities in Asia Pacific to meet booming automotive sector demand
- 5.7. Use of glycidyl methacrylate in targeted drug delivery nanoparticle systems for controlled release therapies
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Glycidyl Methacrylate Market, by Type
- 8.1. Di Functional
- 8.2. Mono Functional
- 9. Glycidyl Methacrylate Market, by Application
- 9.1. Adhesives & Sealants
- 9.1.1. Sealants
- 9.1.2. Structural Adhesives
- 9.2. Coatings
- 9.2.1. Powder Coatings
- 9.2.2. Uv Coatings
- 9.3. Composites
- 9.4. Electronic Chemicals
- 10. Glycidyl Methacrylate Market, by End User
- 10.1. Aerospace & Defense
- 10.2. Automotive
- 10.2.1. Commercial Vehicles
- 10.2.2. Electric Vehicles
- 10.2.3. Passenger Cars
- 10.3. Construction
- 10.3.1. Commercial
- 10.3.2. Industrial
- 10.3.3. Residential
- 10.4. Electronics
- 10.4.1. Potting Compounds
- 10.4.2. Printed Circuit Boards
- 11. Glycidyl Methacrylate Market, by Region
- 11.1. Americas
- 11.1.1. North America
- 11.1.2. Latin America
- 11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 11.2.1. Europe
- 11.2.2. Middle East
- 11.2.3. Africa
- 11.3. Asia-Pacific
- 12. Glycidyl Methacrylate Market, by Group
- 12.1. ASEAN
- 12.2. GCC
- 12.3. European Union
- 12.4. BRICS
- 12.5. G7
- 12.6. NATO
- 13. Glycidyl Methacrylate Market, by Country
- 13.1. United States
- 13.2. Canada
- 13.3. Mexico
- 13.4. Brazil
- 13.5. United Kingdom
- 13.6. Germany
- 13.7. France
- 13.8. Russia
- 13.9. Italy
- 13.10. Spain
- 13.11. China
- 13.12. India
- 13.13. Japan
- 13.14. Australia
- 13.15. South Korea
- 14. Competitive Landscape
- 14.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 14.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 14.3. Competitive Analysis
- 14.3.1. Arkema SA
- 14.3.2. Ataman Kimya
- 14.3.3. BASF SE
- 14.3.4. Eastman Chemical Company
- 14.3.5. Estron Chemical, Inc.
- 14.3.6. Evonik Industries AG
- 14.3.7. Hexion Inc.
- 14.3.8. Huntsman Corporation
- 14.3.9. Jiangsu Sanmu Group Co., Ltd.
- 14.3.10. Kowa American Corporation
- 14.3.11. Kuraray Co., Ltd
- 14.3.12. LG Chem Ltd.
- 14.3.13. LOTTE Chemical Corporation
- 14.3.14. Merck KGaA
- 14.3.15. Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc.
- 14.3.16. Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.
- 14.3.17. Osaka Organic Chemical Industry Ltd.
- 14.3.18. SimSon Pharma Limited
- 14.3.19. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 14.3.20. The Dow Chemical Company
- 14.3.21. Tokyo Chemical Industry
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
