Glass Fiber Market by Product Form (Chopped Strand, Continuous Filament, Mat & Veil), Fiber Type (AR-Glass, C-Glass, E-Glass), Manufacturing Method, Application, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Glass Fiber Market was valued at USD 22.82 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 24.15 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.87%, reaching USD 36.03 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive framing of glass fiber dynamics to orient executives toward near-term strategic priorities, cross-industry drivers, and practical adoption pathways
This executive summary orients senior leaders to the contemporary glass fiber landscape by synthesizing structural drivers, technological inflections, and supply-side dynamics shaping commercial decision-making today.
The analysis emphasizes how evolving performance requirements, materials innovation, and heightened regulatory scrutiny are reshaping procurement and product development pathways. Across multiple industrial domains, glass fiber continues to be positioned as a critical enabling material for weight reduction, thermal management, electrical insulation, and filtration, while concurrently facing rising expectations for lifecycle impact and supply transparency. The introduction establishes the thematic anchors used throughout the report: functional performance, manufacturing differentiation, supply chain resilience, and sustainability integration.
By clarifying these priorities, the section prepares readers to interpret subsequent analyses through a pragmatic lens that balances technical requirements with commercial realities. It also highlights that opportunity identification increasingly rests on cross-functional alignment between product engineering, sourcing, and sustainability teams, as companies reconcile performance ambitions with operational constraints and policy-driven shifts.
Identifying transformative shifts and technology intersections that are redefining performance thresholds, supply complexity, and sustainability expectations in glass fiber use
The industry is undergoing several transformative shifts that are altering competitive boundaries and creating new imperatives for product engineering and supply management.
First, material science advances are expanding the performance envelope of glass fiber through specialized chemistries and hybridization strategies. These innovations enable higher strength-to-weight ratios and improved thermal or corrosive resistance, thereby unlocking new applications across mobility, aerospace, and industrial filtration. Concurrently, production technologies are evolving: manufacturing methods that emphasize throughput, filament control, and fiber morphology are enabling tighter tolerances and more consistent quality, which in turn permit downstream designers to rely on glass fiber in higher-value structural roles.
Second, sustainability considerations have moved from compliance to value creation. Increased scrutiny of embedded carbon, recyclability, and end-of-life treatment is accelerating adoption of circular design practices and novel process routes that reduce energy intensity or enable reuse. Third, supply chain complexity and geopolitically driven policy interventions are prompting buyers to diversify sourcing strategies and deepen supplier collaboration. Taken together, these shifts demand a reorientation of R&D priorities, procurement strategies, and cross-functional governance to capture the benefits and mitigate the risks associated with this new phase of material evolution.
Assessing cumulative implications of United States tariff actions through 2025 on procurement strategies, cost structures, and resilient sourcing models across glass fiber supply chains
Recent tariff measures enacted by the United States through 2025 have introduced persistent cost and sourcing frictions that reverberate across procurement and operational planning.
Manufacturers and buyers responded to these trade interventions by reassessing supplier portfolios, prioritizing near-shore options where feasible, and increasing contractual protections against input price volatility. The cumulative effect has been an acceleration of supply chain mapping activities and a greater willingness to engage in strategic partnerships that provide capacity visibility and preferential allocation during constrained periods. In parallel, firms invested in alternative route-to-market strategies such as establishing localized finishing operations or qualifying multiple upstream suppliers to maintain continuity of supply for critical applications.
The policy environment also incentivized greater transparency around input origins and compliance documentation, prompting procurement teams to institutionalize audits and traceability protocols. For product teams, the policy-driven disruptions underscored the need to design material-flexible platforms that can accommodate alternate fiber types or form factors without necessitating fundamental redesigns. Collectively, these responses illustrate how trade policy acts as a catalyst for both immediate tactical shifts and longer-term structural changes in sourcing and product strategy.
Deep segmentation insights bridging end-use demands, application performance, product morphology, fiber chemistries, and manufacturing techniques for actionable product-market alignment
A rigorous segmentation lens clarifies where value accrues and how technical and commercial choices intersect across end-use, application, form, fiber chemistry, and production technique.
When viewed through end use, demand patterns diverge between industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Construction, Electrical & Electronics, Marine & Shipbuilding, and Transportation, each imposing distinct performance and certification requirements. Application-level differentiation further refines this picture: automotive components and composite materials require tightly controlled fiber properties and compatibility with polymer matrices; industrial filtration and insulation prioritize porosity, thermal behavior, and chemical resistance; textile applications emphasize hand, drape, and processing characteristics. Within composite materials, designers must also choose between thermoplastic composites and thermoset composites depending on recyclability, cycle time, and service demands.
Product form influences both processing and end-use integration, as choices among chopped strand, continuous filament, mat & veil, and woven roving determine handling, reinforcement orientation, and part complexity. Fiber type selection-spanning AR-Glass, C-Glass, E-Glass, and S-Glass-drives mechanical and chemical performance trade-offs that must align with service conditions and cost targets. Manufacturing method likewise creates meaningful differentiation: advanced spinning, centrifugal spinning, flame attenuation, and the float process each produce fibers with distinct diameter distributions, surface characteristics, and production footprints. Together, these segmentation dimensions provide a multidimensional framework for prioritizing investments, qualifying suppliers, and tailoring product specifications to application-specific constraints.
Regionally nuanced intelligence detailing supply chain resilience, demand diversifications, and policy-driven dynamics across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific landscapes
Geographic dynamics shape supply chain resilience, regulatory exposure, and commercial opportunity in materially different ways across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions.
In the Americas, industrial buyers place a premium on supply continuity and localized service capabilities; procurement strategies increasingly emphasize supplier partnerships that shorten lead times and enable responsive technical support. Europe, Middle East & Africa sees a strong interplay between regulatory drivers and sustainability commitments, with firms integrating lifecycle considerations and compliance readiness into product specifications. Across Asia-Pacific, the region’s deep fabrication ecosystems and proximity to raw material suppliers underpin competitive manufacturing cost structures, though buyers must account for variability in standards and the need for robust quality assurance when engaging with diverse suppliers.
These regional distinctions necessitate differentiated go-to-market approaches: investment in local technical centers and quality certification is often rewarded in markets prioritizing engineering support, whereas competitive pricing and scale matter more where high-volume production and rapid turnarounds dominate. For global players, successful regional strategies blend centralized technology platforms with localized execution capabilities to reconcile product consistency with market-specific requirements.
Profiling strategic behaviors, innovation investments, and partnership ecosystems among leading manufacturers and suppliers shaping the competitive glass fiber landscape
Leading companies in the glass fiber ecosystem exhibit a set of recurring strategic behaviors that illuminate potential pathways for others seeking competitive advantage.
First, investment in process innovation and precision manufacturing is a common lever used to differentiate on quality and cost efficiency. Firms that prioritize continuous improvement in filament control, sizing chemistry, and downstream conversion often secure stronger technical partnerships with OEMs. Second, successful suppliers are broadening their value proposition beyond commodity fiber supply by offering application engineering support, customized sizing solutions, and collaborative development programs that reduce integration risk for customers. Third, partnerships and M&A activity are being used selectively to acquire technological capabilities, expand geographic reach, or secure feedstock access, enabling companies to respond more nimbly to demand shifts and regulatory changes.
Additionally, sustainability initiatives are materializing through investments in lower-emission production methods, improved recycling options, and supplier engagement programs focused on traceability. Companies that combine technical excellence with transparent sustainability and customer-centric commercial models are therefore better positioned to capture long-term contracts and to participate in high-value applications where consistency and certification matter most.
Actionable executive recommendations to optimize product portfolios, strengthen sourcing strategies, and accelerate sustainable material transitions in glass fiber operations
Leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic actions that translate strategic intent into measurable operational outcomes while reducing exposure to supply and regulatory risks.
Begin by strengthening supplier qualification and dual-sourcing frameworks that prioritize technical capability and traceability as highly as price. Parallel to sourcing resilience, embed material flexibility into product roadmaps so engineering teams can qualify multiple fiber types and product forms without costly redesigns. Invest selectively in partnerships with suppliers that offer co-development and application engineering, as these collaborations shorten time-to-performance and reduce integration risk for complex applications. On the sustainability front, prioritize energy-efficiency measures in production and evaluate recycling or reclamation pilots that can be scaled across part families where end-of-life considerations influence customer purchasing decisions.
Finally, realign commercial contracting to include clauses that share upside and manage allocation during supply disruption, and develop scenario-based procurement playbooks that coordinate sourcing, inventory, and customer communication. By operationalizing these recommendations, organizations can better balance near-term continuity with longer-term strategic transformation.
Transparent description of research methodology, data triangulation, and quality assurance practices underpinning the analysis and evidence synthesis
The analysis synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs using a triangulated methodology designed to ensure reliability, traceability, and analytical rigor.
Primary inputs included structured interviews with technical and commercial leaders across supply, OEM, and conversion segments, detailed supplier capability questionnaires, and on-site verification of selected production processes. Secondary inputs incorporated peer-reviewed technical literature, standards documentation, policy statements, and published company disclosures to validate performance claims and sustainability commitments. Data synthesis employed cross-checking across independent sources to reconcile discrepancies and to identify consistent themes. Quality assurance measures included reproducibility checks on technical descriptions, methodological transparency, and documentation of assumptions underlying analytical judgments.
Together, these practices produce a defensible evidence base that supports the strategic conclusions and recommendations, and they provide stakeholders with a clear audit trail for how findings were derived and validated.
Concise synthesis highlighting strategic takeaways, risk considerations, and priority actions for stakeholders engaging with glass fiber innovation and supply decisions
The concluding synthesis distills strategic takeaways, key risk considerations, and priority actions that should guide cross-functional decision-making.
Principal takeaways emphasize the interplay between technical performance and supply strategy: product teams must work in lockstep with procurement to ensure that material choices are both technically feasible and operationally sustainable. Risk considerations center on policy-induced trade frictions, feedstock availability, and increasing requirements for lifecycle transparency; mitigation measures include supplier diversification, stronger contractual protections, and accelerated testing of substitute materials. Priority actions for leaders include targeted investments in manufacturing precision, engagement with suppliers on co-development, and pilots to validate recycling or low-energy production approaches.
By focusing on these priorities-engineering-sourcing alignment, supplier capability elevation, and sustainability integration-organizations can better position themselves to capture application-level value while managing supply and regulatory risks that are intrinsic to the contemporary glass fiber ecosystem.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive framing of glass fiber dynamics to orient executives toward near-term strategic priorities, cross-industry drivers, and practical adoption pathways
This executive summary orients senior leaders to the contemporary glass fiber landscape by synthesizing structural drivers, technological inflections, and supply-side dynamics shaping commercial decision-making today.
The analysis emphasizes how evolving performance requirements, materials innovation, and heightened regulatory scrutiny are reshaping procurement and product development pathways. Across multiple industrial domains, glass fiber continues to be positioned as a critical enabling material for weight reduction, thermal management, electrical insulation, and filtration, while concurrently facing rising expectations for lifecycle impact and supply transparency. The introduction establishes the thematic anchors used throughout the report: functional performance, manufacturing differentiation, supply chain resilience, and sustainability integration.
By clarifying these priorities, the section prepares readers to interpret subsequent analyses through a pragmatic lens that balances technical requirements with commercial realities. It also highlights that opportunity identification increasingly rests on cross-functional alignment between product engineering, sourcing, and sustainability teams, as companies reconcile performance ambitions with operational constraints and policy-driven shifts.
Identifying transformative shifts and technology intersections that are redefining performance thresholds, supply complexity, and sustainability expectations in glass fiber use
The industry is undergoing several transformative shifts that are altering competitive boundaries and creating new imperatives for product engineering and supply management.
First, material science advances are expanding the performance envelope of glass fiber through specialized chemistries and hybridization strategies. These innovations enable higher strength-to-weight ratios and improved thermal or corrosive resistance, thereby unlocking new applications across mobility, aerospace, and industrial filtration. Concurrently, production technologies are evolving: manufacturing methods that emphasize throughput, filament control, and fiber morphology are enabling tighter tolerances and more consistent quality, which in turn permit downstream designers to rely on glass fiber in higher-value structural roles.
Second, sustainability considerations have moved from compliance to value creation. Increased scrutiny of embedded carbon, recyclability, and end-of-life treatment is accelerating adoption of circular design practices and novel process routes that reduce energy intensity or enable reuse. Third, supply chain complexity and geopolitically driven policy interventions are prompting buyers to diversify sourcing strategies and deepen supplier collaboration. Taken together, these shifts demand a reorientation of R&D priorities, procurement strategies, and cross-functional governance to capture the benefits and mitigate the risks associated with this new phase of material evolution.
Assessing cumulative implications of United States tariff actions through 2025 on procurement strategies, cost structures, and resilient sourcing models across glass fiber supply chains
Recent tariff measures enacted by the United States through 2025 have introduced persistent cost and sourcing frictions that reverberate across procurement and operational planning.
Manufacturers and buyers responded to these trade interventions by reassessing supplier portfolios, prioritizing near-shore options where feasible, and increasing contractual protections against input price volatility. The cumulative effect has been an acceleration of supply chain mapping activities and a greater willingness to engage in strategic partnerships that provide capacity visibility and preferential allocation during constrained periods. In parallel, firms invested in alternative route-to-market strategies such as establishing localized finishing operations or qualifying multiple upstream suppliers to maintain continuity of supply for critical applications.
The policy environment also incentivized greater transparency around input origins and compliance documentation, prompting procurement teams to institutionalize audits and traceability protocols. For product teams, the policy-driven disruptions underscored the need to design material-flexible platforms that can accommodate alternate fiber types or form factors without necessitating fundamental redesigns. Collectively, these responses illustrate how trade policy acts as a catalyst for both immediate tactical shifts and longer-term structural changes in sourcing and product strategy.
Deep segmentation insights bridging end-use demands, application performance, product morphology, fiber chemistries, and manufacturing techniques for actionable product-market alignment
A rigorous segmentation lens clarifies where value accrues and how technical and commercial choices intersect across end-use, application, form, fiber chemistry, and production technique.
When viewed through end use, demand patterns diverge between industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Construction, Electrical & Electronics, Marine & Shipbuilding, and Transportation, each imposing distinct performance and certification requirements. Application-level differentiation further refines this picture: automotive components and composite materials require tightly controlled fiber properties and compatibility with polymer matrices; industrial filtration and insulation prioritize porosity, thermal behavior, and chemical resistance; textile applications emphasize hand, drape, and processing characteristics. Within composite materials, designers must also choose between thermoplastic composites and thermoset composites depending on recyclability, cycle time, and service demands.
Product form influences both processing and end-use integration, as choices among chopped strand, continuous filament, mat & veil, and woven roving determine handling, reinforcement orientation, and part complexity. Fiber type selection-spanning AR-Glass, C-Glass, E-Glass, and S-Glass-drives mechanical and chemical performance trade-offs that must align with service conditions and cost targets. Manufacturing method likewise creates meaningful differentiation: advanced spinning, centrifugal spinning, flame attenuation, and the float process each produce fibers with distinct diameter distributions, surface characteristics, and production footprints. Together, these segmentation dimensions provide a multidimensional framework for prioritizing investments, qualifying suppliers, and tailoring product specifications to application-specific constraints.
Regionally nuanced intelligence detailing supply chain resilience, demand diversifications, and policy-driven dynamics across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific landscapes
Geographic dynamics shape supply chain resilience, regulatory exposure, and commercial opportunity in materially different ways across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions.
In the Americas, industrial buyers place a premium on supply continuity and localized service capabilities; procurement strategies increasingly emphasize supplier partnerships that shorten lead times and enable responsive technical support. Europe, Middle East & Africa sees a strong interplay between regulatory drivers and sustainability commitments, with firms integrating lifecycle considerations and compliance readiness into product specifications. Across Asia-Pacific, the region’s deep fabrication ecosystems and proximity to raw material suppliers underpin competitive manufacturing cost structures, though buyers must account for variability in standards and the need for robust quality assurance when engaging with diverse suppliers.
These regional distinctions necessitate differentiated go-to-market approaches: investment in local technical centers and quality certification is often rewarded in markets prioritizing engineering support, whereas competitive pricing and scale matter more where high-volume production and rapid turnarounds dominate. For global players, successful regional strategies blend centralized technology platforms with localized execution capabilities to reconcile product consistency with market-specific requirements.
Profiling strategic behaviors, innovation investments, and partnership ecosystems among leading manufacturers and suppliers shaping the competitive glass fiber landscape
Leading companies in the glass fiber ecosystem exhibit a set of recurring strategic behaviors that illuminate potential pathways for others seeking competitive advantage.
First, investment in process innovation and precision manufacturing is a common lever used to differentiate on quality and cost efficiency. Firms that prioritize continuous improvement in filament control, sizing chemistry, and downstream conversion often secure stronger technical partnerships with OEMs. Second, successful suppliers are broadening their value proposition beyond commodity fiber supply by offering application engineering support, customized sizing solutions, and collaborative development programs that reduce integration risk for customers. Third, partnerships and M&A activity are being used selectively to acquire technological capabilities, expand geographic reach, or secure feedstock access, enabling companies to respond more nimbly to demand shifts and regulatory changes.
Additionally, sustainability initiatives are materializing through investments in lower-emission production methods, improved recycling options, and supplier engagement programs focused on traceability. Companies that combine technical excellence with transparent sustainability and customer-centric commercial models are therefore better positioned to capture long-term contracts and to participate in high-value applications where consistency and certification matter most.
Actionable executive recommendations to optimize product portfolios, strengthen sourcing strategies, and accelerate sustainable material transitions in glass fiber operations
Leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic actions that translate strategic intent into measurable operational outcomes while reducing exposure to supply and regulatory risks.
Begin by strengthening supplier qualification and dual-sourcing frameworks that prioritize technical capability and traceability as highly as price. Parallel to sourcing resilience, embed material flexibility into product roadmaps so engineering teams can qualify multiple fiber types and product forms without costly redesigns. Invest selectively in partnerships with suppliers that offer co-development and application engineering, as these collaborations shorten time-to-performance and reduce integration risk for complex applications. On the sustainability front, prioritize energy-efficiency measures in production and evaluate recycling or reclamation pilots that can be scaled across part families where end-of-life considerations influence customer purchasing decisions.
Finally, realign commercial contracting to include clauses that share upside and manage allocation during supply disruption, and develop scenario-based procurement playbooks that coordinate sourcing, inventory, and customer communication. By operationalizing these recommendations, organizations can better balance near-term continuity with longer-term strategic transformation.
Transparent description of research methodology, data triangulation, and quality assurance practices underpinning the analysis and evidence synthesis
The analysis synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs using a triangulated methodology designed to ensure reliability, traceability, and analytical rigor.
Primary inputs included structured interviews with technical and commercial leaders across supply, OEM, and conversion segments, detailed supplier capability questionnaires, and on-site verification of selected production processes. Secondary inputs incorporated peer-reviewed technical literature, standards documentation, policy statements, and published company disclosures to validate performance claims and sustainability commitments. Data synthesis employed cross-checking across independent sources to reconcile discrepancies and to identify consistent themes. Quality assurance measures included reproducibility checks on technical descriptions, methodological transparency, and documentation of assumptions underlying analytical judgments.
Together, these practices produce a defensible evidence base that supports the strategic conclusions and recommendations, and they provide stakeholders with a clear audit trail for how findings were derived and validated.
Concise synthesis highlighting strategic takeaways, risk considerations, and priority actions for stakeholders engaging with glass fiber innovation and supply decisions
The concluding synthesis distills strategic takeaways, key risk considerations, and priority actions that should guide cross-functional decision-making.
Principal takeaways emphasize the interplay between technical performance and supply strategy: product teams must work in lockstep with procurement to ensure that material choices are both technically feasible and operationally sustainable. Risk considerations center on policy-induced trade frictions, feedstock availability, and increasing requirements for lifecycle transparency; mitigation measures include supplier diversification, stronger contractual protections, and accelerated testing of substitute materials. Priority actions for leaders include targeted investments in manufacturing precision, engagement with suppliers on co-development, and pilots to validate recycling or low-energy production approaches.
By focusing on these priorities-engineering-sourcing alignment, supplier capability elevation, and sustainability integration-organizations can better position themselves to capture application-level value while managing supply and regulatory risks that are intrinsic to the contemporary glass fiber ecosystem.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising adoption of glass fiber in wind turbine blade reinforcement to boost renewable energy efficiency
- 5.2. Development of bio-based resin systems compatible with glass fiber composites for sustainable manufacturing
- 5.3. Integration of embedded fiber optic sensors in glass fiber composites for real-time structural health monitoring
- 5.4. Expansion of lightweight automotive components using glass fiber-reinforced polymers to enhance fuel economy
- 5.5. Innovations in high-strength alkali-resistant glass fiber meshes for coastal infrastructure corrosion protection
- 5.6. Advancements in recycled glass fiber materials to minimize environmental impact in composite production
- 5.7. Emergence of pultruded glass fiber profile applications in building and construction for durable load-bearing solutions
- 5.8. Growing use of glass fiber fabrics in additive manufacturing processes for complex composite part fabrication
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Glass Fiber Market, by Product Form
- 8.1. Chopped Strand
- 8.2. Continuous Filament
- 8.3. Mat & Veil
- 8.4. Woven Roving
- 9. Glass Fiber Market, by Fiber Type
- 9.1. AR-Glass
- 9.2. C-Glass
- 9.3. E-Glass
- 9.4. S-Glass
- 10. Glass Fiber Market, by Manufacturing Method
- 10.1. Advanced Spinning
- 10.2. Centrifugal Spinning
- 10.3. Flame Attenuation
- 10.4. Float Process
- 11. Glass Fiber Market, by Application
- 11.1. Automotive Components
- 11.2. Composite Materials
- 11.2.1. Thermoplastic Composites
- 11.2.2. Thermoset Composites
- 11.3. Industrial Filtration
- 11.4. Insulation
- 11.5. Textile
- 12. Glass Fiber Market, by End Use Industry
- 12.1. Aerospace & Defense
- 12.2. Construction
- 12.3. Electrical & Electronics
- 12.4. Marine & Shipbuilding
- 12.5. Transportation
- 13. Glass Fiber Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Glass Fiber Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Glass Fiber Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. 3B Fibreglass
- 16.3.2. AGY Holding Corp.
- 16.3.3. Ahlstrom Oyj
- 16.3.4. Asahi Fiber Glass Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.5. BASF SE
- 16.3.6. China Beihai Fiberglass Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.7. China Jushi Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.8. Chongqing Polycomp International Corporation
- 16.3.9. Gurit Services AG
- 16.3.10. Hexcel Corporation
- 16.3.11. Jiangsu Jiuding New Materials Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.12. Johns Manville Corporation
- 16.3.13. Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.14. Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.15. Owens Corning
- 16.3.16. PPG Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.17. Reliance Industries Limited
- 16.3.18. Saint-Gobain S.A.
- 16.3.19. Scott Bader Company Ltd.
- 16.3.20. Taishan Fiberglass Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
