Geocomposites Market by Product Type (Cellular Confinement, Geogrid, Geomembrane), Application (Construction Projects, Erosion Control, Mining), Function, Raw Material - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Geocomposites Market was valued at USD 504.28 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 536.48 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.37%, reaching USD 826.46 million by 2032.
A concise orientation to the geocomposites sector that frames material innovation, functional roles, and cross-sector application drivers for technical and commercial stakeholders
Geocomposites have evolved from niche technical solutions into foundational components across civil engineering, environmental containment, and infrastructure resilience initiatives. This executive summary distills the critical dynamics shaping the sector, emphasizing functional performance, materials innovation, and cross-industry application patterns. The aim is to provide decision-makers with a concise, structured view of where technology, policy, and project demand intersect so that stakeholders can make better-informed specification and procurement choices.
The introduction situates geocomposites within the broader context of infrastructure renewal, coastal defense, transportation maintenance, and resource extraction mitigation. It outlines the core product categories, functional roles within engineered systems, and the principal drivers influencing adoption. By foregrounding technical drivers and commercial constraints, this section sets expectations for the deeper analytical segments that follow, preparing readers to engage with segmentation insights, policy impacts, and practical recommendations tailored for operators, designers, and commercial leaders.
An integrated view of technological, regulatory, and supply chain transitions that are redefining product specifications, procurement priorities, and deployment practices across geocomposite applications
The landscape for geocomposites is shifting along multiple axes simultaneously, driven by material science advances, evolving performance specifications, and a recalibration of supply chains. Advances in polymer chemistry and manufacturing processes have improved tensile strength, UV resistance, and long-term creep behavior, making geocomposites viable in increasingly demanding applications. As a result, engineering specifications are migrating from prescriptive component-based requirements toward performance-based criteria that prioritize lifecycle resilience and maintenance reduction.
Concurrently, regulatory and environmental priorities are reshaping procurement and design choices. Stringent environmental standards for landfill containment and coastal protection coupled with an increased emphasis on reducing carbon intensity in construction practices are prompting wider adoption of engineered solutions that offer both functional performance and demonstrable sustainability benefits. Lastly, the growing emphasis on modular, rapid-deployment systems for emergency response and remote infrastructure projects has elevated interest in lightweight, easy-to-install geocomposite assemblies that reduce onsite labor and accelerate schedule-critical works.
A practical assessment of how tariff-driven input cost changes and trade policy dynamics have reshaped sourcing strategies, contract terms, and project risk allocation in the geocomposites supply chain
The introduction of United States tariffs in 2025 has created a cascade of operational and strategic adjustments across the geocomposites supply chain. Manufacturers that rely on imported polymers, specialized additives, or finished geosynthetic components have faced immediate input cost pressures, which in turn have prompted sourcing diversification. Procurement teams are responding by qualifying additional suppliers, increasing local content where viable, and in some cases accelerating qualification of alternative materials that deliver comparable performance at lower landed cost exposure.
Beyond procurement, tariffs have influenced capital planning and inventory strategies. Project owners and contractors have adopted more conservative procurement timelines to insulate schedules from shipment variability and have considered longer lead inventories for critical components. Meanwhile, engineering teams are reconciling performance specifications with material availability, sometimes selecting over-specified solutions where supply chain risk is elevated, and other times reworking designs to accommodate materials with more secure supply pathways. These changes are reshaping contractual terms, pricing frameworks, and risk allocation between owners and contractors, amplifying the importance of early supply chain engagement and contractual clarity on material origins and substitution protocols.
A layered segmentation framework that maps product types, application subsegments, functional roles, and raw material chemistries to practical selection and specification criteria
Understanding the market through a segmented lens clarifies where technical demand and commercial opportunity align. Based on product type, analysis spans cellular confinement, geogrid, geomembrane, geonet, nonwoven geotextile, and woven geotextile, each bringing distinct performance attributes and installation considerations that influence selection for specific tasks. For instance, cellular confinement delivers soil stabilization and load distribution advantages in slope and pavement systems, while geotextiles-both woven and nonwoven-serve critical roles in filtration, separation, and reinforcement across strata.
Based on application, the market discussion examines construction projects, erosion control, mining, transportation infrastructure, waste management, and water management. Construction projects are further examined through building foundations, retaining walls, and tunnels, each of which imposes unique tensile, creep, and interface friction requirements. Erosion control evaluation addresses reforestation barriers, shoreline protection, and slope protection where resistance to hydraulic forces and vegetative integration matter. Mining analysis considers heap leach pads, overburden management, and pit slope stabilization with emphasis on chemical compatibility and mechanical durability. Transportation infrastructure discussion includes airport runways, railways, and roads where cyclic loading and drainage performance are central. Waste management coverage looks at capping systems, landfill liners, and leachate collection with containment integrity as the priority. Water management considerations assess coastal protection, drainage systems, and reservoir lining where hydraulic containment and erosion mitigation are paramount.
Based on function, the analysis differentiates barrier, cushioning, drainage, filtration, reinforcement, and separation roles, mapping material characteristics to performance requirements and installation contexts. Finally, based on raw material, the study evaluates polyamide, polyester, polyethylene, and polypropylene substrates, considering how each polymer’s mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and durability profile affect long-term performance and suitability for specific applications. This layered segmentation yields a practical matrix linking product design, functional intent, and material chemistry to real-world application needs.
A comparative regional analysis highlighting how infrastructure priorities, environmental pressures, and regulatory expectations are shaping geocomposite demand and sourcing strategies across global markets
Regional dynamics drive distinct adoption patterns and risk profiles for geocomposites. In the Americas, investment in both urban infrastructure renewal and resource sector activity supports demand for high-performance containment and stabilization systems. Project procurement in this region increasingly emphasizes supplier traceability, compliance with environmental permitting, and resilience against extreme weather events, creating opportunities for solutions that demonstrate proven long-term behavior under cyclical loading and variable climates.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a diverse set of drivers: regulatory stringency and sustainability goals in European markets are accelerating uptake of durable, low-maintenance geocomposites for infrastructure and environmental protection, while rapid urbanization and desertification pressures in parts of the Middle East and Africa are prioritizing erosion control and water management solutions. Stakeholders in these subregions are focused on lifecycle performance, adaptation to saline or arid conditions, and the ability to integrate with vegetation-based stabilization techniques.
Asia-Pacific continues to be a large and technically diverse market where rapid infrastructure expansion, coastal defense needs, and mining activity create varied demand for geocomposite solutions. In densely populated coastal zones and deltaic plains, the emphasis is on robust shoreline protection and drainage engineering, whereas inland development and transport upgrades prioritize slope stabilization and foundational reinforcement. Supply chain localization, regional manufacturing capacity, and trade policy also shape sourcing strategies and product availability across this geography.
Insight into industry competitive dynamics showing how innovation, integrated service offerings, and manufacturing agility are determining supplier differentiation and contract wins
Competitive dynamics in the geocomposites landscape are shaped by a balance between product innovation, manufacturing scale, and field performance validation. Leading manufacturers are investing in process optimization to improve material consistency and reduce variability in critical mechanical properties, while research partnerships with academic and testing laboratories are producing more robust, application-specific performance data. These investments translate into reduced installation risk and clearer specification language for engineers and owners.
At the same time, market entrants and specialized suppliers are differentiating through service models that combine product supply with installation training, warranty packages, and design consultation. This shift toward integrated solutions reflects buyer demand for single-source accountability where performance risk can be demonstrably mitigated. Strategic partnerships and channel development are also enabling faster response in project-critical timelines, and companies that can align manufacturing flexibility with rapid technical support secure advantageous positions in competitive bids.
Action-oriented recommendations designed to fortify procurement resilience, standardize performance-based specifications, and accelerate technical adoption while mitigating commercial and regulatory risks
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions to protect margin, strengthen supply continuity, and improve specification outcomes. First, invest in diversified sourcing strategies that incorporate regional manufacturing partners and validated secondary suppliers to mitigate tariff and logistics risk. Early supplier engagement during the design phase reduces the risk of late-stage substitutions and helps secure lead times.
Second, align product specifications with performance-based acceptance criteria and standardized test methods to create clearer pathways for material substitution without compromising durability. Third, expand technical support capabilities, including installation training and performance monitoring, to reduce lifecycle risk and increase the likelihood of repeat procurement. Fourth, pursue targeted material R&D that focuses on lower-carbon polymer alternatives and recyclability to meet tightening environmental requirements while preserving mechanical performance. Finally, strengthen contractual risk-sharing mechanisms with clients and subcontractors to explicitly address material origin, qualification timelines, and contingency protocols, enabling more predictable project delivery under shifting trade and regulatory conditions.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach that integrates stakeholder interviews, field validation, and standards-based secondary analysis to produce robust, actionable insights for technical and procurement audiences
The research methodology combines primary engagement with industry stakeholders and rigorous secondary analysis to ensure conclusions are both technically grounded and commercially relevant. Primary work included structured interviews with engineering firms, procurement leads, installation contractors, and material scientists to surface practical performance pain points and real-world substitution patterns. These engagements were complemented by site-level observations and supplier technical briefings to validate installation practices and warranty frameworks.
Secondary research synthesized peer-reviewed technical literature, standards documents, material test methods, and publicly available regulatory guidance to build a robust framework linking polymer chemistry to functional performance. Data triangulation occurred through cross-validation between laboratory performance claims, field performance case studies, and stakeholder interviews. Quality controls included methodological transparency, consistent definition of technical metrics, and sensitivity checks to ensure findings remain applicable across different climatic and regulatory contexts.
Synthesis of core findings highlighting how material advances, procurement practices, and regulatory imperatives are jointly shaping long-term resilience and specification choices in geocomposite projects
In conclusion, geocomposites are positioned to play an increasingly central role in resilient infrastructure, environmental containment, and erosion mitigation solutions. Material innovation and improved manufacturing control are expanding application envelopes, while regulatory and sustainability pressures are shifting procurement toward performance-oriented specifications. These forces converge to reward suppliers that can demonstrate documented field performance, offer integrated technical support, and deliver supply chain transparency.
Given the current trade environment and evolving performance expectations, stakeholders that proactively address sourcing risk, adopt performance-based specification language, and invest in lifecycle verification will be best positioned to reduce project uncertainty and capture longer-term value. The strategic integration of material selection, design optimization, and contractual clarity will determine which projects achieve the intended resilience and cost-effectiveness over their operational lives.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to the geocomposites sector that frames material innovation, functional roles, and cross-sector application drivers for technical and commercial stakeholders
Geocomposites have evolved from niche technical solutions into foundational components across civil engineering, environmental containment, and infrastructure resilience initiatives. This executive summary distills the critical dynamics shaping the sector, emphasizing functional performance, materials innovation, and cross-industry application patterns. The aim is to provide decision-makers with a concise, structured view of where technology, policy, and project demand intersect so that stakeholders can make better-informed specification and procurement choices.
The introduction situates geocomposites within the broader context of infrastructure renewal, coastal defense, transportation maintenance, and resource extraction mitigation. It outlines the core product categories, functional roles within engineered systems, and the principal drivers influencing adoption. By foregrounding technical drivers and commercial constraints, this section sets expectations for the deeper analytical segments that follow, preparing readers to engage with segmentation insights, policy impacts, and practical recommendations tailored for operators, designers, and commercial leaders.
An integrated view of technological, regulatory, and supply chain transitions that are redefining product specifications, procurement priorities, and deployment practices across geocomposite applications
The landscape for geocomposites is shifting along multiple axes simultaneously, driven by material science advances, evolving performance specifications, and a recalibration of supply chains. Advances in polymer chemistry and manufacturing processes have improved tensile strength, UV resistance, and long-term creep behavior, making geocomposites viable in increasingly demanding applications. As a result, engineering specifications are migrating from prescriptive component-based requirements toward performance-based criteria that prioritize lifecycle resilience and maintenance reduction.
Concurrently, regulatory and environmental priorities are reshaping procurement and design choices. Stringent environmental standards for landfill containment and coastal protection coupled with an increased emphasis on reducing carbon intensity in construction practices are prompting wider adoption of engineered solutions that offer both functional performance and demonstrable sustainability benefits. Lastly, the growing emphasis on modular, rapid-deployment systems for emergency response and remote infrastructure projects has elevated interest in lightweight, easy-to-install geocomposite assemblies that reduce onsite labor and accelerate schedule-critical works.
A practical assessment of how tariff-driven input cost changes and trade policy dynamics have reshaped sourcing strategies, contract terms, and project risk allocation in the geocomposites supply chain
The introduction of United States tariffs in 2025 has created a cascade of operational and strategic adjustments across the geocomposites supply chain. Manufacturers that rely on imported polymers, specialized additives, or finished geosynthetic components have faced immediate input cost pressures, which in turn have prompted sourcing diversification. Procurement teams are responding by qualifying additional suppliers, increasing local content where viable, and in some cases accelerating qualification of alternative materials that deliver comparable performance at lower landed cost exposure.
Beyond procurement, tariffs have influenced capital planning and inventory strategies. Project owners and contractors have adopted more conservative procurement timelines to insulate schedules from shipment variability and have considered longer lead inventories for critical components. Meanwhile, engineering teams are reconciling performance specifications with material availability, sometimes selecting over-specified solutions where supply chain risk is elevated, and other times reworking designs to accommodate materials with more secure supply pathways. These changes are reshaping contractual terms, pricing frameworks, and risk allocation between owners and contractors, amplifying the importance of early supply chain engagement and contractual clarity on material origins and substitution protocols.
A layered segmentation framework that maps product types, application subsegments, functional roles, and raw material chemistries to practical selection and specification criteria
Understanding the market through a segmented lens clarifies where technical demand and commercial opportunity align. Based on product type, analysis spans cellular confinement, geogrid, geomembrane, geonet, nonwoven geotextile, and woven geotextile, each bringing distinct performance attributes and installation considerations that influence selection for specific tasks. For instance, cellular confinement delivers soil stabilization and load distribution advantages in slope and pavement systems, while geotextiles-both woven and nonwoven-serve critical roles in filtration, separation, and reinforcement across strata.
Based on application, the market discussion examines construction projects, erosion control, mining, transportation infrastructure, waste management, and water management. Construction projects are further examined through building foundations, retaining walls, and tunnels, each of which imposes unique tensile, creep, and interface friction requirements. Erosion control evaluation addresses reforestation barriers, shoreline protection, and slope protection where resistance to hydraulic forces and vegetative integration matter. Mining analysis considers heap leach pads, overburden management, and pit slope stabilization with emphasis on chemical compatibility and mechanical durability. Transportation infrastructure discussion includes airport runways, railways, and roads where cyclic loading and drainage performance are central. Waste management coverage looks at capping systems, landfill liners, and leachate collection with containment integrity as the priority. Water management considerations assess coastal protection, drainage systems, and reservoir lining where hydraulic containment and erosion mitigation are paramount.
Based on function, the analysis differentiates barrier, cushioning, drainage, filtration, reinforcement, and separation roles, mapping material characteristics to performance requirements and installation contexts. Finally, based on raw material, the study evaluates polyamide, polyester, polyethylene, and polypropylene substrates, considering how each polymer’s mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and durability profile affect long-term performance and suitability for specific applications. This layered segmentation yields a practical matrix linking product design, functional intent, and material chemistry to real-world application needs.
A comparative regional analysis highlighting how infrastructure priorities, environmental pressures, and regulatory expectations are shaping geocomposite demand and sourcing strategies across global markets
Regional dynamics drive distinct adoption patterns and risk profiles for geocomposites. In the Americas, investment in both urban infrastructure renewal and resource sector activity supports demand for high-performance containment and stabilization systems. Project procurement in this region increasingly emphasizes supplier traceability, compliance with environmental permitting, and resilience against extreme weather events, creating opportunities for solutions that demonstrate proven long-term behavior under cyclical loading and variable climates.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a diverse set of drivers: regulatory stringency and sustainability goals in European markets are accelerating uptake of durable, low-maintenance geocomposites for infrastructure and environmental protection, while rapid urbanization and desertification pressures in parts of the Middle East and Africa are prioritizing erosion control and water management solutions. Stakeholders in these subregions are focused on lifecycle performance, adaptation to saline or arid conditions, and the ability to integrate with vegetation-based stabilization techniques.
Asia-Pacific continues to be a large and technically diverse market where rapid infrastructure expansion, coastal defense needs, and mining activity create varied demand for geocomposite solutions. In densely populated coastal zones and deltaic plains, the emphasis is on robust shoreline protection and drainage engineering, whereas inland development and transport upgrades prioritize slope stabilization and foundational reinforcement. Supply chain localization, regional manufacturing capacity, and trade policy also shape sourcing strategies and product availability across this geography.
Insight into industry competitive dynamics showing how innovation, integrated service offerings, and manufacturing agility are determining supplier differentiation and contract wins
Competitive dynamics in the geocomposites landscape are shaped by a balance between product innovation, manufacturing scale, and field performance validation. Leading manufacturers are investing in process optimization to improve material consistency and reduce variability in critical mechanical properties, while research partnerships with academic and testing laboratories are producing more robust, application-specific performance data. These investments translate into reduced installation risk and clearer specification language for engineers and owners.
At the same time, market entrants and specialized suppliers are differentiating through service models that combine product supply with installation training, warranty packages, and design consultation. This shift toward integrated solutions reflects buyer demand for single-source accountability where performance risk can be demonstrably mitigated. Strategic partnerships and channel development are also enabling faster response in project-critical timelines, and companies that can align manufacturing flexibility with rapid technical support secure advantageous positions in competitive bids.
Action-oriented recommendations designed to fortify procurement resilience, standardize performance-based specifications, and accelerate technical adoption while mitigating commercial and regulatory risks
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions to protect margin, strengthen supply continuity, and improve specification outcomes. First, invest in diversified sourcing strategies that incorporate regional manufacturing partners and validated secondary suppliers to mitigate tariff and logistics risk. Early supplier engagement during the design phase reduces the risk of late-stage substitutions and helps secure lead times.
Second, align product specifications with performance-based acceptance criteria and standardized test methods to create clearer pathways for material substitution without compromising durability. Third, expand technical support capabilities, including installation training and performance monitoring, to reduce lifecycle risk and increase the likelihood of repeat procurement. Fourth, pursue targeted material R&D that focuses on lower-carbon polymer alternatives and recyclability to meet tightening environmental requirements while preserving mechanical performance. Finally, strengthen contractual risk-sharing mechanisms with clients and subcontractors to explicitly address material origin, qualification timelines, and contingency protocols, enabling more predictable project delivery under shifting trade and regulatory conditions.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach that integrates stakeholder interviews, field validation, and standards-based secondary analysis to produce robust, actionable insights for technical and procurement audiences
The research methodology combines primary engagement with industry stakeholders and rigorous secondary analysis to ensure conclusions are both technically grounded and commercially relevant. Primary work included structured interviews with engineering firms, procurement leads, installation contractors, and material scientists to surface practical performance pain points and real-world substitution patterns. These engagements were complemented by site-level observations and supplier technical briefings to validate installation practices and warranty frameworks.
Secondary research synthesized peer-reviewed technical literature, standards documents, material test methods, and publicly available regulatory guidance to build a robust framework linking polymer chemistry to functional performance. Data triangulation occurred through cross-validation between laboratory performance claims, field performance case studies, and stakeholder interviews. Quality controls included methodological transparency, consistent definition of technical metrics, and sensitivity checks to ensure findings remain applicable across different climatic and regulatory contexts.
Synthesis of core findings highlighting how material advances, procurement practices, and regulatory imperatives are jointly shaping long-term resilience and specification choices in geocomposite projects
In conclusion, geocomposites are positioned to play an increasingly central role in resilient infrastructure, environmental containment, and erosion mitigation solutions. Material innovation and improved manufacturing control are expanding application envelopes, while regulatory and sustainability pressures are shifting procurement toward performance-oriented specifications. These forces converge to reward suppliers that can demonstrate documented field performance, offer integrated technical support, and deliver supply chain transparency.
Given the current trade environment and evolving performance expectations, stakeholders that proactively address sourcing risk, adopt performance-based specification language, and invest in lifecycle verification will be best positioned to reduce project uncertainty and capture longer-term value. The strategic integration of material selection, design optimization, and contractual clarity will determine which projects achieve the intended resilience and cost-effectiveness over their operational lives.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
184 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of sensor-embedded geocomposites for real-time structural health monitoring in civil infrastructure
- 5.2. Rising adoption of bio-based polymer geocomposites to reduce environmental footprint in infrastructural applications
- 5.3. Advancements in nanofiber-reinforced geocomposites for enhanced mechanical strength in erosion control systems
- 5.4. Implementation of geocomposite drainage layers in modern landfill designs to improve leachate collection efficiency
- 5.5. Development of recycled plastic geocomposites for cost-effective and sustainable road base reinforcement solutions
- 5.6. Growing demand for lightweight geocomposite liners in wastewater treatment plants to optimize installation and durability
- 5.7. Increasing collaboration between material science institutes and industry for custom-designed geocomposites in coastal protection projects
- 5.8. Application of 3D printing technologies for complex geocomposite component fabrication in tunneling and underground construction
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Geocomposites Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Cellular Confinement
- 8.2. Geogrid
- 8.3. Geomembrane
- 8.4. Geonet
- 8.5. Nonwoven Geotextile
- 8.6. Woven Geotextile
- 9. Geocomposites Market, by Application
- 9.1. Construction Projects
- 9.1.1. Building Foundations
- 9.1.2. Retaining Walls
- 9.1.3. Tunnels
- 9.2. Erosion Control
- 9.2.1. Reforestation Barriers
- 9.2.2. Shoreline Protection
- 9.2.3. Slope Protection
- 9.3. Mining
- 9.3.1. Heap Leach Pads
- 9.3.2. Overburden Management
- 9.3.3. Pit Slope Stabilization
- 9.4. Transportation Infrastructure
- 9.4.1. Airport Runways
- 9.4.2. Railways
- 9.4.3. Roads
- 9.5. Waste Management
- 9.5.1. Capping Systems
- 9.5.2. Landfill Liners
- 9.5.3. Leachate Collection
- 9.6. Water Management
- 9.6.1. Coastal Protection
- 9.6.2. Drainage Systems
- 9.6.3. Reservoir Lining
- 10. Geocomposites Market, by Function
- 10.1. Barrier
- 10.2. Cushioning
- 10.3. Drainage
- 10.4. Filtration
- 10.5. Reinforcement
- 10.6. Separation
- 11. Geocomposites Market, by Raw Material
- 11.1. Polyamide
- 11.2. Polyester
- 11.3. Polyethylene
- 11.4. Polypropylene
- 12. Geocomposites Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Geocomposites Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Geocomposites Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. ABG Ltd.
- 15.3.2. ACE Geosynthetics
- 15.3.3. Asahi Kasei Advance Corporation
- 15.3.4. Atarfil
- 15.3.5. Berry Global
- 15.3.6. Climax Synthetics Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.7. Enviro-Pro Geosynthetics Ltd.
- 15.3.8. Feicheng Lianyi Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.9. Fibertex Nonwovens A/S
- 15.3.10. Geofabrics Australasia Pty Ltd
- 15.3.11. Global Synthetics
- 15.3.12. Gorantla Geosynthetics Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.13. GSE Environmental
- 15.3.14. Hanes Geo Components
- 15.3.15. Huesker Synthetic GmbH
- 15.3.16. Officine Maccaferri Spa
- 15.3.17. NAUE GmbH & Co. KG
- 15.3.18. Pietrucha Group
- 15.3.19. Polyfabrics Australasia Pty Ltd
- 15.3.20. Propex Geotextiles
- 15.3.21. PRS Geo-Technologies
- 15.3.22. SKAPS Industries
- 15.3.23. Solmax
- 15.3.24. Strata Systems, Inc.
- 15.3.25. TenCate Geosynthetics
- 15.3.26. Tensar International Corporation
- 15.3.27. Texel Technical Materials, Inc.
- 15.3.28. TYPAR Geosynthetics
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
