Next-Generation Network Market by Deployment Model (Hybrid, Private, Public), Technology (4G LTE, 5G, Nfv), Component, End User, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Next-Generation Network Market was valued at USD 24.56 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 26.44 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.11%, reaching USD 45.86 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation to the evolving technical, commercial, and regulatory drivers reshaping next-generation networks and executive decision points
The advance of next-generation networks is reshaping the technical, commercial, and regulatory landscapes in which connectivity solutions are designed, procured, and operated. This analysis introduces the fundamental shifts that are influencing enterprise architectures, public infrastructure planning, and consumer device ecosystems, and it outlines the critical decision points that industry leaders must address today to remain competitive tomorrow.
Early adopters of virtualized and software-defined architectures are moving from proof-of-concept projects to staged deployments, aligning business cases with operational transformation agendas. Simultaneously, spectrum policy, fiber backhaul investments, and edge computing strategies are converging to create new dependencies between network operators, cloud providers, and vertical industry players. These dynamics are driving cross-sector collaboration that blurs traditional supplier–buyer boundaries and necessitates new partnership models.
As new service paradigms such as fixed wireless access, private 5G campuses, and massive IoT installations proliferate, stakeholders must reconcile interoperability, security, and lifecycle management challenges across heterogeneous infrastructures. The remainder of this report synthesizes these threads into actionable insights that help executives prioritize investments, mitigate supply-chain and regulatory risks, and accelerate time to value without compromising resilience.
How disaggregation, virtualization, and evolving enterprise requirements are creating structural shifts in network economics, operations, and competitive differentiation
The landscape of connectivity has entered a period of transformative shifts driven by technological maturation, architectural convergence, and changing consumption models. The rise of disaggregated hardware, network functions virtualization, and software-defined networking is shifting capital profiles from monolithic equipment to modular, cloud-native capabilities, enabling service differentiation through software and orchestration rather than solely through radio or transport hardware.
At the same time, the growing emphasis on latency-sensitive applications and distributed compute is accelerating edge adoption and rebalancing traffic flows away from centralized data centers. This shift creates new considerations for transport planning, spectrum utilization, and interconnection economics. On the policy front, regulators are revisiting spectrum assignment frameworks and backhaul access rules, which in turn affect the speed and scope of commercial rollouts.
In parallel, enterprise demand is evolving: more verticals are adopting private network models and hybrid deployment strategies to achieve greater control over performance, security, and data residency. Consumer behavior continues to drive higher per-device bandwidth expectations, while machine-type deployments are bringing long-tail connectivity requirements that must be met without eroding overall network performance. Collectively, these trends are redefining vendor value propositions and the battlegrounds for differentiation across the ecosystem.
Managing policy-driven procurement complexity and supplier diversification as tariff adjustments reshape supply-chain resilience and contractual governance for network deployments
Recent tariff developments in the United States have introduced additional complexity into procurement and supply-chain planning for network equipment, components, and related services. Tariff adjustments influence vendor sourcing decisions and accelerate supplier diversification strategies as operators and systems integrators seek to reduce exposure to trade policy volatility and the potential for input-cost inflation. The practical outcome is a more deliberate approach to supplier qualification and an increased emphasis on total cost of ownership over initial equipment pricing.
As procurement teams reassess component sourcing, those responsible for program management must incorporate trade compliance, origin documentation, and potential lead-time variability into contractual frameworks. This results in tighter vendor performance clauses, expanded penalty provisions for delay, and a more rigorous evaluation of alternative supply routes including regional sourcing and nearshoring. The interplay between tariffs and logistical constraints also shifts inventory strategies, prompting some organizations to balance just-in-time procurement with strategic buffer stocks for critical components.
Consequently, procurement and strategy leaders are investing more in scenario planning and cross-functional governance to align commercial terms with engineering roadmaps. Legal, compliance, and sourcing functions are becoming central to network rollout plans, ensuring that policy-driven cost changes do not undermine service objectives or delay deployment milestones. Ultimately, prudently managing tariff-related risk supports continuity of critical rollout activities while preserving budgetary and operational flexibility.
Multi-dimensional segmentation analysis revealing differentiated adoption pathways across deployment models, end-user verticals, technology stacks, application demands, and core components
Segment-level dynamics reveal distinct pathways for adoption and value capture, shaped by deployment model, end-user profile, technology choices, application demands, and component architectures. Based on Deployment Model, market participants must weigh the trade-offs between Hybrid deployments, Private deployments, and Public deployments, designing operations and support models to reflect differing control, performance, and cost imperatives. Based on End User, strategic focus should reflect divergent needs across Consumer, Enterprise, and Government customers; within Consumer, device segmentation spans Smartphone, Tablets, and Wearables and influences radio and edge compute requirements, while Enterprise demand varies across Bfsi, Healthcare, It & Telecom, and Manufacturing verticals with contrasting reliability, security, and latency profiles.
Based on Technology, portfolio and roadmap decisions should consider the coexistence and migration paths for 4G LTE, 5G, Nfv, and Sdn; the 4G LTE pathway requires attention to Fdd and Tdd variants to align with regional spectrum and device ecosystems, while 5G choices involve Nsa and Sa architectures that bear on service orchestration and edge exposure. Based on Application, network planners must balance investments to serve Enhanced Mobile Broadband, Massive IoT, and Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications, with the latter use cases demanding strict performance SLAs and the Massive IoT category further differentiated by Lte-M and Nb-Iot technologies to meet power and density needs.
Based on Component, procurement and systems design must integrate considerations across Core Network, Network Management, Radio Access Network, and Transport Network; core decisions include 5Gc versus Epc evolution paths, network management selections between Ems and Oss philosophies, radio access trade-offs between Macro Cell and Small Cell deployments, and transport choices spanning Fiber and Microwave that determine capacity, latency, and resiliency characteristics. Each segmentation lens informs distinct operational priorities, partner ecosystems, and monetization approaches, and together they form a multi-dimensional map that supports tailored go-to-market strategies and deployment sequencing.
How regional regulatory priorities, infrastructure maturity, and public–private collaboration models are shaping differentiated deployment strategies across global geographies
Regional dynamics are shaping investment corridors, regulatory priorities, and collaboration models in ways that demand nuanced strategic responses. In the Americas, policymakers and operators are balancing urban densification requirements with rural broadband objectives, which in turn influences spectrum auction design, fiber rollout incentives, and public–private partnership structures. The Americas region also presents a highly competitive vendor landscape where differentiation increasingly depends on service orchestration, managed services, and localized support capabilities.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a complex tapestry of regulatory regimes and infrastructure maturity. Western European markets emphasize greenfield opportunities for edge compute and private networks, whereas certain emerging markets within the region prioritize basic connectivity and last-mile transport. Regulatory harmonization efforts coexist with stringent data-protection frameworks, prompting operators and integrators to develop modular solutions that can be rapidly localized to meet compliance demands. The Middle East & Africa component of the region is witnessing accelerated infrastructure investment in urban centers alongside targeted initiatives to close rural connectivity gaps.
Asia-Pacific continues to be a focal point for advanced deployments, with several markets pursuing ambitious national strategies for spectrum, fiber densification, and industrial digitization. The pace of technology adoption varies across markets, reflecting differing fiscal priorities and industry partnerships. Collectively, these regional patterns imply that global vendors must adopt adaptive commercial models that enable local partnerships, flexible supply arrangements, and region-specific product configurations to capture both scale and relevance.
Why interoperability, software-led differentiation, and partnership-driven go-to-market strategies are determining competitive advantage across next-generation network suppliers
The competitive landscape is being redefined by firms that combine systems expertise with software-led differentiation and ecosystem orchestration capabilities. Leading suppliers that emphasize modular, cloud-native stacks and open interfaces are better positioned to participate in multi-vendor, multi-domain implementations. Strategic partnerships between hardware specialists, software orchestration providers, and systems integrators are becoming a de facto requirement for large-scale rollouts, especially where private networks and edge services intersect with legacy operations.
Procurement teams are increasingly evaluating partners based not only on feature sets but also on demonstrable integration experience, lifecycle support capabilities, and a roadmap for software-driven enhancements. Vendors that can present compelling references across vertical implementations, deliver robust security frameworks, and offer flexible commercial terms will gain preference. At the same time, new entrants focusing on narrow but high-value capabilities-such as specialized radio solutions, transport optimization, or domain-specific orchestration-are altering competitive dynamics, incentivizing incumbents to accelerate innovation and partnership strategies.
Consequently, corporate development and alliances strategies are central to competitive positioning. Market participants should prioritize interoperability testing, joint go-to-market initiatives, and shared product roadmaps to reduce deployment friction and accelerate customer value realization. The firms that manage to combine technical depth with commercial agility will lead the next wave of enterprise and public-network transformations.
Actionable strategy levers for leaders to align architecture, procurement, partnerships, and talent investments to accelerate resilient and scalable network transformations
Industry leaders must act decisively to convert ambiguity into advantage by aligning investment priorities, procurement practices, and partner ecosystems with evolving technical and regulatory realities. First, executives should adopt a modular architecture mindset that prioritizes open interfaces, orchestration flexibility, and lifecycle upgradeability to avoid vendor lock-in and to maximize future-proofing. This approach supports incremental deployment while allowing for rapid integration of advanced capabilities such as edge compute and network slicing.
Second, organizations should strengthen cross-functional governance that embeds sourcing, legal, engineering, and regulatory teams into rollout planning. By doing so, they can better manage trade-policy risks, optimize supplier diversification, and ensure contractual protections that reflect realistic lead times and compliance requirements. Third, building strategic alliances with cloud providers, systems integrators, and specialized technology vendors will help scale complex deployments and accelerate time to operational maturity.
Finally, leaders should invest in workforce transformation-developing talent in areas such as cloud-native network engineering, security, and data-driven operations-to sustain competitive performance. Combined, these actions will enable organizations to reduce deployment risk, control costs over the lifecycle, and capture new revenue opportunities enabled by next-generation network capabilities.
A transparent, multi-source research approach combining expert interviews, standards review, and cross-validation to inform strategic network decisions without numeric forecasting
This analysis synthesizes primary and secondary research inputs, expert interviews, and cross-disciplinary validation to produce evidence-based insights that are relevant to both technical and commercial decision-makers. Primary inputs included structured interviews with network architects, procurement leads, and industry regulators, which provided qualitative context on deployment priorities, supplier risk management, and regulatory expectations. Secondary inputs encompassed technology whitepapers, standards documents, and publicly available policy notices that informed the technical and regulatory framing.
Analysts triangulated qualitative findings with documented product roadmaps, vendor interoperability announcements, and infrastructure investment programs to ensure alignment between stated strategies and operational initiatives. The methodology emphasized transparency in source attribution and a conservative approach to interpretive claims, prioritizing corroboration across independent sources. Where appropriate, sensitivity analyses were carried out to highlight how differing regulatory or tariff scenarios could influence procurement and supplier strategies, without attempting to produce numerical forecasts.
Throughout the research process, peer review was applied to major analytical conclusions to reduce bias and to verify that recommendations are actionable for senior leaders. The resulting framework is designed to be adaptable, allowing practitioners to apply the insights to specific deployment contexts and procurement cycles.
Synthesis of strategic priorities and governance actions that enable organizations to translate next-generation network capabilities into resilient operational advantage
In conclusion, the next phase of network evolution will be defined by software-centric architectures, diversified sourcing strategies, and regionally nuanced commercial models. Organizations that embrace modularity, strengthen cross-functional governance, and invest in targeted partnerships will be better positioned to respond to policy shifts, tariff-related procurement complexity, and evolving end-user demands. These strategic priorities will determine the pace at which advanced services migrate from pilot stages to operational scale.
Decision-makers should view this moment as an opportunity to rebalance risk and agility: by adopting interoperable solutions and by embedding procurement and compliance rigor into planning cycles, they can protect deployment timelines while preserving strategic optionality. The ongoing migration toward edge-centric, software-defined, and private-network use cases will generate differentiated competitive advantages for those who can integrate technology, commercial governance, and workforce capabilities into a cohesive transformation program.
The recommendations and insights presented here are intended to help senior leaders craft pragmatic paths forward that align technical choices with commercial realities and regulatory constraints, enabling sustainable, resilient network modernization.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to the evolving technical, commercial, and regulatory drivers reshaping next-generation networks and executive decision points
The advance of next-generation networks is reshaping the technical, commercial, and regulatory landscapes in which connectivity solutions are designed, procured, and operated. This analysis introduces the fundamental shifts that are influencing enterprise architectures, public infrastructure planning, and consumer device ecosystems, and it outlines the critical decision points that industry leaders must address today to remain competitive tomorrow.
Early adopters of virtualized and software-defined architectures are moving from proof-of-concept projects to staged deployments, aligning business cases with operational transformation agendas. Simultaneously, spectrum policy, fiber backhaul investments, and edge computing strategies are converging to create new dependencies between network operators, cloud providers, and vertical industry players. These dynamics are driving cross-sector collaboration that blurs traditional supplier–buyer boundaries and necessitates new partnership models.
As new service paradigms such as fixed wireless access, private 5G campuses, and massive IoT installations proliferate, stakeholders must reconcile interoperability, security, and lifecycle management challenges across heterogeneous infrastructures. The remainder of this report synthesizes these threads into actionable insights that help executives prioritize investments, mitigate supply-chain and regulatory risks, and accelerate time to value without compromising resilience.
How disaggregation, virtualization, and evolving enterprise requirements are creating structural shifts in network economics, operations, and competitive differentiation
The landscape of connectivity has entered a period of transformative shifts driven by technological maturation, architectural convergence, and changing consumption models. The rise of disaggregated hardware, network functions virtualization, and software-defined networking is shifting capital profiles from monolithic equipment to modular, cloud-native capabilities, enabling service differentiation through software and orchestration rather than solely through radio or transport hardware.
At the same time, the growing emphasis on latency-sensitive applications and distributed compute is accelerating edge adoption and rebalancing traffic flows away from centralized data centers. This shift creates new considerations for transport planning, spectrum utilization, and interconnection economics. On the policy front, regulators are revisiting spectrum assignment frameworks and backhaul access rules, which in turn affect the speed and scope of commercial rollouts.
In parallel, enterprise demand is evolving: more verticals are adopting private network models and hybrid deployment strategies to achieve greater control over performance, security, and data residency. Consumer behavior continues to drive higher per-device bandwidth expectations, while machine-type deployments are bringing long-tail connectivity requirements that must be met without eroding overall network performance. Collectively, these trends are redefining vendor value propositions and the battlegrounds for differentiation across the ecosystem.
Managing policy-driven procurement complexity and supplier diversification as tariff adjustments reshape supply-chain resilience and contractual governance for network deployments
Recent tariff developments in the United States have introduced additional complexity into procurement and supply-chain planning for network equipment, components, and related services. Tariff adjustments influence vendor sourcing decisions and accelerate supplier diversification strategies as operators and systems integrators seek to reduce exposure to trade policy volatility and the potential for input-cost inflation. The practical outcome is a more deliberate approach to supplier qualification and an increased emphasis on total cost of ownership over initial equipment pricing.
As procurement teams reassess component sourcing, those responsible for program management must incorporate trade compliance, origin documentation, and potential lead-time variability into contractual frameworks. This results in tighter vendor performance clauses, expanded penalty provisions for delay, and a more rigorous evaluation of alternative supply routes including regional sourcing and nearshoring. The interplay between tariffs and logistical constraints also shifts inventory strategies, prompting some organizations to balance just-in-time procurement with strategic buffer stocks for critical components.
Consequently, procurement and strategy leaders are investing more in scenario planning and cross-functional governance to align commercial terms with engineering roadmaps. Legal, compliance, and sourcing functions are becoming central to network rollout plans, ensuring that policy-driven cost changes do not undermine service objectives or delay deployment milestones. Ultimately, prudently managing tariff-related risk supports continuity of critical rollout activities while preserving budgetary and operational flexibility.
Multi-dimensional segmentation analysis revealing differentiated adoption pathways across deployment models, end-user verticals, technology stacks, application demands, and core components
Segment-level dynamics reveal distinct pathways for adoption and value capture, shaped by deployment model, end-user profile, technology choices, application demands, and component architectures. Based on Deployment Model, market participants must weigh the trade-offs between Hybrid deployments, Private deployments, and Public deployments, designing operations and support models to reflect differing control, performance, and cost imperatives. Based on End User, strategic focus should reflect divergent needs across Consumer, Enterprise, and Government customers; within Consumer, device segmentation spans Smartphone, Tablets, and Wearables and influences radio and edge compute requirements, while Enterprise demand varies across Bfsi, Healthcare, It & Telecom, and Manufacturing verticals with contrasting reliability, security, and latency profiles.
Based on Technology, portfolio and roadmap decisions should consider the coexistence and migration paths for 4G LTE, 5G, Nfv, and Sdn; the 4G LTE pathway requires attention to Fdd and Tdd variants to align with regional spectrum and device ecosystems, while 5G choices involve Nsa and Sa architectures that bear on service orchestration and edge exposure. Based on Application, network planners must balance investments to serve Enhanced Mobile Broadband, Massive IoT, and Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications, with the latter use cases demanding strict performance SLAs and the Massive IoT category further differentiated by Lte-M and Nb-Iot technologies to meet power and density needs.
Based on Component, procurement and systems design must integrate considerations across Core Network, Network Management, Radio Access Network, and Transport Network; core decisions include 5Gc versus Epc evolution paths, network management selections between Ems and Oss philosophies, radio access trade-offs between Macro Cell and Small Cell deployments, and transport choices spanning Fiber and Microwave that determine capacity, latency, and resiliency characteristics. Each segmentation lens informs distinct operational priorities, partner ecosystems, and monetization approaches, and together they form a multi-dimensional map that supports tailored go-to-market strategies and deployment sequencing.
How regional regulatory priorities, infrastructure maturity, and public–private collaboration models are shaping differentiated deployment strategies across global geographies
Regional dynamics are shaping investment corridors, regulatory priorities, and collaboration models in ways that demand nuanced strategic responses. In the Americas, policymakers and operators are balancing urban densification requirements with rural broadband objectives, which in turn influences spectrum auction design, fiber rollout incentives, and public–private partnership structures. The Americas region also presents a highly competitive vendor landscape where differentiation increasingly depends on service orchestration, managed services, and localized support capabilities.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a complex tapestry of regulatory regimes and infrastructure maturity. Western European markets emphasize greenfield opportunities for edge compute and private networks, whereas certain emerging markets within the region prioritize basic connectivity and last-mile transport. Regulatory harmonization efforts coexist with stringent data-protection frameworks, prompting operators and integrators to develop modular solutions that can be rapidly localized to meet compliance demands. The Middle East & Africa component of the region is witnessing accelerated infrastructure investment in urban centers alongside targeted initiatives to close rural connectivity gaps.
Asia-Pacific continues to be a focal point for advanced deployments, with several markets pursuing ambitious national strategies for spectrum, fiber densification, and industrial digitization. The pace of technology adoption varies across markets, reflecting differing fiscal priorities and industry partnerships. Collectively, these regional patterns imply that global vendors must adopt adaptive commercial models that enable local partnerships, flexible supply arrangements, and region-specific product configurations to capture both scale and relevance.
Why interoperability, software-led differentiation, and partnership-driven go-to-market strategies are determining competitive advantage across next-generation network suppliers
The competitive landscape is being redefined by firms that combine systems expertise with software-led differentiation and ecosystem orchestration capabilities. Leading suppliers that emphasize modular, cloud-native stacks and open interfaces are better positioned to participate in multi-vendor, multi-domain implementations. Strategic partnerships between hardware specialists, software orchestration providers, and systems integrators are becoming a de facto requirement for large-scale rollouts, especially where private networks and edge services intersect with legacy operations.
Procurement teams are increasingly evaluating partners based not only on feature sets but also on demonstrable integration experience, lifecycle support capabilities, and a roadmap for software-driven enhancements. Vendors that can present compelling references across vertical implementations, deliver robust security frameworks, and offer flexible commercial terms will gain preference. At the same time, new entrants focusing on narrow but high-value capabilities-such as specialized radio solutions, transport optimization, or domain-specific orchestration-are altering competitive dynamics, incentivizing incumbents to accelerate innovation and partnership strategies.
Consequently, corporate development and alliances strategies are central to competitive positioning. Market participants should prioritize interoperability testing, joint go-to-market initiatives, and shared product roadmaps to reduce deployment friction and accelerate customer value realization. The firms that manage to combine technical depth with commercial agility will lead the next wave of enterprise and public-network transformations.
Actionable strategy levers for leaders to align architecture, procurement, partnerships, and talent investments to accelerate resilient and scalable network transformations
Industry leaders must act decisively to convert ambiguity into advantage by aligning investment priorities, procurement practices, and partner ecosystems with evolving technical and regulatory realities. First, executives should adopt a modular architecture mindset that prioritizes open interfaces, orchestration flexibility, and lifecycle upgradeability to avoid vendor lock-in and to maximize future-proofing. This approach supports incremental deployment while allowing for rapid integration of advanced capabilities such as edge compute and network slicing.
Second, organizations should strengthen cross-functional governance that embeds sourcing, legal, engineering, and regulatory teams into rollout planning. By doing so, they can better manage trade-policy risks, optimize supplier diversification, and ensure contractual protections that reflect realistic lead times and compliance requirements. Third, building strategic alliances with cloud providers, systems integrators, and specialized technology vendors will help scale complex deployments and accelerate time to operational maturity.
Finally, leaders should invest in workforce transformation-developing talent in areas such as cloud-native network engineering, security, and data-driven operations-to sustain competitive performance. Combined, these actions will enable organizations to reduce deployment risk, control costs over the lifecycle, and capture new revenue opportunities enabled by next-generation network capabilities.
A transparent, multi-source research approach combining expert interviews, standards review, and cross-validation to inform strategic network decisions without numeric forecasting
This analysis synthesizes primary and secondary research inputs, expert interviews, and cross-disciplinary validation to produce evidence-based insights that are relevant to both technical and commercial decision-makers. Primary inputs included structured interviews with network architects, procurement leads, and industry regulators, which provided qualitative context on deployment priorities, supplier risk management, and regulatory expectations. Secondary inputs encompassed technology whitepapers, standards documents, and publicly available policy notices that informed the technical and regulatory framing.
Analysts triangulated qualitative findings with documented product roadmaps, vendor interoperability announcements, and infrastructure investment programs to ensure alignment between stated strategies and operational initiatives. The methodology emphasized transparency in source attribution and a conservative approach to interpretive claims, prioritizing corroboration across independent sources. Where appropriate, sensitivity analyses were carried out to highlight how differing regulatory or tariff scenarios could influence procurement and supplier strategies, without attempting to produce numerical forecasts.
Throughout the research process, peer review was applied to major analytical conclusions to reduce bias and to verify that recommendations are actionable for senior leaders. The resulting framework is designed to be adaptable, allowing practitioners to apply the insights to specific deployment contexts and procurement cycles.
Synthesis of strategic priorities and governance actions that enable organizations to translate next-generation network capabilities into resilient operational advantage
In conclusion, the next phase of network evolution will be defined by software-centric architectures, diversified sourcing strategies, and regionally nuanced commercial models. Organizations that embrace modularity, strengthen cross-functional governance, and invest in targeted partnerships will be better positioned to respond to policy shifts, tariff-related procurement complexity, and evolving end-user demands. These strategic priorities will determine the pace at which advanced services migrate from pilot stages to operational scale.
Decision-makers should view this moment as an opportunity to rebalance risk and agility: by adopting interoperable solutions and by embedding procurement and compliance rigor into planning cycles, they can protect deployment timelines while preserving strategic optionality. The ongoing migration toward edge-centric, software-defined, and private-network use cases will generate differentiated competitive advantages for those who can integrate technology, commercial governance, and workforce capabilities into a cohesive transformation program.
The recommendations and insights presented here are intended to help senior leaders craft pragmatic paths forward that align technical choices with commercial realities and regulatory constraints, enabling sustainable, resilient network modernization.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of 5G network slicing to enable enterprise-specific service customization and agility
- 5.2. Integration of multi-access edge computing for ultra-low latency and improved application performance
- 5.3. Deployment of virtualized RAN architecture to reduce capital expenditure and accelerate network scalability
- 5.4. Implementation of AI-driven network automation for predictive maintenance and traffic optimization
- 5.5. Evolution toward cloud-native core networks to support dynamic service provisioning and interoperability
- 5.6. Growing importance of network security orchestration in multi-cloud and hybrid network environments
- 5.7. Emergence of private 5G networks for industrial automation and Internet of Things connectivity
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Next-Generation Network Market, by Deployment Model
- 8.1. Hybrid
- 8.2. Private
- 8.3. Public
- 9. Next-Generation Network Market, by Technology
- 9.1. 4G LTE
- 9.1.1. Fdd
- 9.1.2. Tdd
- 9.2. 5G
- 9.2.1. Nsa
- 9.2.2. Sa
- 9.3. Nfv
- 9.4. Sdn
- 10. Next-Generation Network Market, by Component
- 10.1. Core Network
- 10.1.1. 5Gc
- 10.1.2. Epc
- 10.2. Network Management
- 10.2.1. Ems
- 10.2.2. Oss
- 10.3. Radio Access Network
- 10.3.1. Macro Cell
- 10.3.2. Small Cell
- 10.4. Transport Network
- 10.4.1. Fiber
- 10.4.2. Microwave
- 11. Next-Generation Network Market, by End User
- 11.1. Consumer
- 11.1.1. Smartphone
- 11.1.2. Tablets
- 11.1.3. Wearables
- 11.2. Enterprise
- 11.2.1. Bfsi
- 11.2.2. Healthcare
- 11.2.3. It & Telecom
- 11.2.4. Manufacturing
- 11.3. Government
- 12. Next-Generation Network Market, by Application
- 12.1. Enhanced Mobile Broadband
- 12.2. Massive IoT
- 12.2.1. Lte-M
- 12.2.2. Nb-Iot
- 12.3. Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications
- 13. Next-Generation Network Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Next-Generation Network Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Next-Generation Network Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. ACOME
- 16.3.2. Analog Devices, Inc.
- 16.3.3. Astera Labs, Inc.
- 16.3.4. Broadcom Inc.
- 16.3.5. Capgemini SE
- 16.3.6. Ciena Corporation
- 16.3.7. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 16.3.8. Dell Technologies Inc.
- 16.3.9. Elmos Semiconductor SE
- 16.3.10. Fujitsu Limited
- 16.3.11. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
- 16.3.12. Huawei Investment & Holding Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.13. Hyundai Motor Company
- 16.3.14. Infineon Technologies AG
- 16.3.15. Juniper Networks, Inc.
- 16.3.16. Keysight Technologies
- 16.3.17. Melexis NV
- 16.3.18. Microchip Technology Inc.
- 16.3.19. Nokia Corporation
- 16.3.20. NXP Semiconductors N.V.
- 16.3.21. Renault Group
- 16.3.22. Renesas Electronics Corporation
- 16.3.23. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 16.3.24. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
- 16.3.25. STMicroelectronics N.V.
- 16.3.26. Tektronix, Inc. by Fortive Corporation
- 16.3.27. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- 16.3.28. ZTE Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
