Gaskets & Seals Market by Product Type (Gaskets, Seals), Material (Composite, Graphite, Metal), Distribution Channel, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Gaskets & Seals Market was valued at USD 6.44 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 6.90 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.53%, reaching USD 11.51 billion by 2032.
An authoritative introduction framing how technical innovation, procurement sophistication, and regulatory convergence are reshaping the global gaskets and seals environment
The gaskets and seals landscape sits at the intersection of precision engineering, materials science, and global supply dynamics. As industrial systems demand higher reliability, longer service intervals, and greater efficiency, the technologies and sourcing strategies that underpin sealing solutions have advanced accordingly. This introduction frames the technical, commercial, and regulatory vectors shaping decision-making across converters, OEMs, distributors and aftermarket service providers.
Engineering complexity now extends beyond part geometry to include material compatibility, lifecycle performance under extreme temperatures and pressures, and integration with predictive maintenance ecosystems. Simultaneously, procurement strategies have shifted from lowest-cost sourcing to total cost of ownership, where downtime avoidance and operational continuity carry premium value. Regulatory frameworks and quality standards continue to converge across jurisdictions, prompting manufacturers to adopt traceability, certification, and end-to-end quality assurance as competitive differentiators.
Taken together, these forces create both disruptive risk and clear opportunity. The remainder of this executive summary parses the transformative shifts in demand, the trade policy environment, segmentation-specific implications, and practical actions leaders can take to strengthen resilience and capture growth in critical end markets.
How advances in materials science, manufacturing precision, and digital services are recalibrating supplier advantage and buyer expectations across the industry
The sector is experiencing transformative shifts driven by advances in materials, manufacturing technologies, and digital enablement. Novel composites and engineered elastomers are pushing service boundaries of gaskets and seals, enabling operation in higher temperatures, more aggressive chemical environments, and more compact system architectures. Additive manufacturing and precision CNC machining reduce lead times for complex geometries, while surface engineering and coating technologies extend seal life and reduce maintenance cycles.
At the same time, buyers increasingly prioritize lifecycle outcomes rather than unit cost. This has promoted the rise of value-added service models, where suppliers bundle condition monitoring, logistics assurance and rapid-response maintenance support. Digital tools such as sensor-enabled seals and integrated asset management platforms improve predictive maintenance capabilities, creating new commercial models and aftermarket revenues.
Parallel to technological change, geopolitical and trade realignments force companies to reassess sourcing strategies and supplier risk. Companies that combine technical leadership with diversified, resilient supply chains are positioned to capture market share, while suppliers that standardize quality, accelerate NPI cycles, and expand service offerings will set a new competitive baseline.
Detailed analysis of how United States tariff actions in 2025 compelled rapid supply chain redesign, nearshoring, and compliance-driven cost mitigation strategies across the sector
In 2025, tariffs and trade measures imposed by the United States introduced a layer of complexity for manufacturers and buyers of sealing solutions, prompting strategic adaptation across the value chain. These measures elevated the importance of supply chain mapping and cost-to-serve analysis, forcing many procurement teams to reassess supplier footprints and alternative sourcing pathways. In response, firms accelerated supplier qualification programs in lower-risk jurisdictions and expanded inventory buffering strategically to ensure uninterrupted operations.
The tariffs also incentivized nearshoring and reshoring initiatives, particularly for mission‑critical components where lead times and reliability outweigh incremental cost increases. As a result, engineering teams and sourcing leaders collaborated more closely to redesign components for manufacturability with local supply bases, thereby reducing tariff exposure and improving responsiveness. Compliance burdens rose as companies implemented enhanced tariff classification, origin documentation and duty mitigation strategies such as Free Trade Agreement utilization and bonded inventory management.
Manufacturers with integrated aftermarket capabilities and localized pre-assembly options mitigated margin pressure by offering bundled service contracts and value-added inventory programs. Overall, while tariffs created short-term cost and administrative burdens, they also accelerated structural adjustments-diversifying supplier networks, strengthening domestic production capabilities, and elevating the strategic role of design-to-cost initiatives in long-term competitiveness.
Insightful segmentation analysis revealing where product types, material choices, industry applications, and channel strategies create differentiated commercial and engineering imperatives
Segmentation reveals where technical requirements and commercial behaviors diverge, and thus where suppliers can differentiate through product design, material expertise and channel strategy. Product type distinctions between gaskets and seals shape manufacturing processes and go-to-market approaches: gaskets that include envelope, jacketed, ring joint, sheet and spiral wound variants demand expertise in flange standards and static sealing, whereas seals composed of mechanical seals, O rings, oil seals, U cup seals and U seals focus on dynamic performance, shaft tolerances and elastomeric resilience.
Material segmentation further informs R&D and inventory strategies. Composite, graphite, metal, PTFE and rubber materials each present distinct handling, testing and certification requirements that influence lead times and supplier capital intensity. End use industry segmentation clarifies demand drivers and regulatory regimes: aerospace & defense prioritizes traceability and certification, automotive weighs cost and volume, chemical & petrochemical stress-tests corrosion resistance, construction & OEM emphasize installation simplicity, oil & gas demands extreme condition durability, and power generation stresses long lifecycle reliability.
Distribution channel choices change commercial economics. OEM relationships require collaborative design cycles and long-term qualification, while aftermarket channels-direct, distributor and ecommerce-drive different service levels and inventory models. Suppliers that align product engineering with material mastery and channel-specific value propositions capture higher lifetime value and reduce warranty risk.
Comparative regional insights showing how the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific each define unique demand drivers, regulatory priorities, and supply chain strategies
Regional dynamics shape demand patterns, regulatory contexts and supply chain options in distinct ways. The Americas exhibit a strong emphasis on reshoring and aftermarket services, driven by energy sector investments and a preference for locally sourced critical components; as a result, suppliers that can offer quick-turn manufacturing and inventory programs tend to secure long-term contracts with industrial customers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa reflect a blend of advanced regulatory standards, mature automotive and power generation markets, and energy-rich economies that require highly engineered sealing solutions. In these markets, certifications, materials compliance and distributor networks play an outsize role in commercial success, and relationships with channel partners often determine access to large industrial accounts.
Asia-Pacific remains a dual-paced region where rapid industrialization and automotive growth coexist with highly cost-competitive manufacturing hubs. Suppliers that balance local operational efficiency with global quality standards and that invest in service infrastructure to support OEMs and aftermarket channels are best positioned to benefit from both high-volume production and emerging demand for higher-performance materials.
How competitive advantage is increasingly defined by materials expertise, integrated aftermarket services, and strategic consolidation that expands technical reach and regional footprint
Competitive dynamics center on reliability, technical depth, and the ability to offer integrated services beyond discrete components. Leading firms prioritize investments in materials science, accelerated new-product introduction, and automated quality assurance to reduce variability and warranty exposure. In parallel, a subset of suppliers differentiate through aftermarket service platforms that combine predictive maintenance, inventory-as-a-service and rapid-response logistics to create stickier customer relationships.
Consolidation continues among mid-sized suppliers seeking scale to support R&D and to achieve broader geographic reach, while specialized manufacturers deepen vertical expertise in high-value niches such as high-temperature composites or complex spiral wound seals. Strategic partnerships between materials innovators and precision fabricators shorten time-to-market for advanced solutions, and distributors that adopt digital storefronts and data-driven stocking optimize turnover and reduce obsolescence risk.
Talent and process capabilities emerge as competitive gates. Organizations that implement robust training programs for sealing design, materials testing and failure analysis reduce time-to-qualification for new customers. Similarly, those that integrate engineering, quality and commercial teams deliver higher customer lifetime value through coordinated project execution and improved first-pass yield.
Actionable recommendations for leaders to accelerate material innovation, redesign supply networks for resilience, and monetize aftermarket services while improving commercial execution
Industry leaders should adopt a multidimensional action plan that addresses technical innovation, supply chain resilience and commercial model evolution. First, accelerate material and design innovation programs that emphasize durability under stress conditions and compatibility with digital monitoring, because product differentiation increasingly hinges on demonstrable lifecycle performance. Integrate failure-mode data into iterative product development to shorten qualification cycles and improve first-pass success rates.
Second, redesign supply chain strategies to include diversified, risk-ranked supplier tiers and regional manufacturing options for mission-critical components. Establish cross-functional teams that align sourcing, engineering and logistics to enable rapid supplier onboarding and localized assembly where tariffs or lead-time constraints apply. Complement these efforts with duty mitigation strategies and bonded inventory solutions to preserve margin and ensure continuity.
Third, expand aftermarket and service offerings by bundling condition-based maintenance, inventory programs and expedited replacement options. Invest in digital tools that surface actionable asset health insights and enable subscription-based revenue streams. Finally, strengthen channel partnerships through co-investment in training, joint quality standards and shared forecasting to improve fill rates and reduce inventory carrying costs.
Transparent research methodology combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical literature analysis, and iterative validation to ensure robust and actionable insights for decision-makers
The research approach combined qualitative expert interviews, technical literature review, and systematic validation through cross-functional industry panels. Primary interviews included procurement leaders, design engineers, aftermarket managers and distributor executives to capture firsthand perspectives on supply chain risk, material performance and commercial expectations. These qualitative inputs grounded hypotheses about demand drivers and product segmentation.
Secondary sources comprised technical journals, regulatory guidance documents and manufacturer product literature to verify materials behavior, certification requirements and manufacturing capabilities. Data triangulation ensured that conclusions reflected consistent observations across multiple stakeholders, and iterative validation sessions with industry practitioners refined the interpretation of trends and implications for manufacturers and buyers.
Methodological rigor included standardized interview protocols, coding of qualitative themes, and scenario analysis to test strategic responses under different trade and supply shock conditions. The study prioritized transparency in assumptions and captured limitations where variance in regional regulations or proprietary supplier practices could influence local outcomes.
A concise strategic conclusion emphasizing the need to fuse engineering excellence with commercial agility to secure market relevance and operational resilience
In conclusion, the gaskets and seals sector is at a pivotal juncture where technical innovation, shifting trade dynamics, and evolving buyer expectations are converging to reorder competitive advantage. Suppliers that invest in material science, shorten new-product introduction cycles, and expand service-oriented offerings will capture disproportionate value in both OEM and aftermarket channels. Equally, companies that proactively redesign supply chains to manage tariff exposure and to localize critical production reduce operational vulnerability and improve customer responsiveness.
The strategic imperative is clear: integrate engineering excellence with commercial agility. By doing so, organizations can transform sealing components from commoditized parts into strategic enablers of asset reliability and operational efficiency. Stakeholders who adopt the recommendations outlined here will be better positioned to navigate uncertainty and to convert technical capability into sustained market relevance.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative introduction framing how technical innovation, procurement sophistication, and regulatory convergence are reshaping the global gaskets and seals environment
The gaskets and seals landscape sits at the intersection of precision engineering, materials science, and global supply dynamics. As industrial systems demand higher reliability, longer service intervals, and greater efficiency, the technologies and sourcing strategies that underpin sealing solutions have advanced accordingly. This introduction frames the technical, commercial, and regulatory vectors shaping decision-making across converters, OEMs, distributors and aftermarket service providers.
Engineering complexity now extends beyond part geometry to include material compatibility, lifecycle performance under extreme temperatures and pressures, and integration with predictive maintenance ecosystems. Simultaneously, procurement strategies have shifted from lowest-cost sourcing to total cost of ownership, where downtime avoidance and operational continuity carry premium value. Regulatory frameworks and quality standards continue to converge across jurisdictions, prompting manufacturers to adopt traceability, certification, and end-to-end quality assurance as competitive differentiators.
Taken together, these forces create both disruptive risk and clear opportunity. The remainder of this executive summary parses the transformative shifts in demand, the trade policy environment, segmentation-specific implications, and practical actions leaders can take to strengthen resilience and capture growth in critical end markets.
How advances in materials science, manufacturing precision, and digital services are recalibrating supplier advantage and buyer expectations across the industry
The sector is experiencing transformative shifts driven by advances in materials, manufacturing technologies, and digital enablement. Novel composites and engineered elastomers are pushing service boundaries of gaskets and seals, enabling operation in higher temperatures, more aggressive chemical environments, and more compact system architectures. Additive manufacturing and precision CNC machining reduce lead times for complex geometries, while surface engineering and coating technologies extend seal life and reduce maintenance cycles.
At the same time, buyers increasingly prioritize lifecycle outcomes rather than unit cost. This has promoted the rise of value-added service models, where suppliers bundle condition monitoring, logistics assurance and rapid-response maintenance support. Digital tools such as sensor-enabled seals and integrated asset management platforms improve predictive maintenance capabilities, creating new commercial models and aftermarket revenues.
Parallel to technological change, geopolitical and trade realignments force companies to reassess sourcing strategies and supplier risk. Companies that combine technical leadership with diversified, resilient supply chains are positioned to capture market share, while suppliers that standardize quality, accelerate NPI cycles, and expand service offerings will set a new competitive baseline.
Detailed analysis of how United States tariff actions in 2025 compelled rapid supply chain redesign, nearshoring, and compliance-driven cost mitigation strategies across the sector
In 2025, tariffs and trade measures imposed by the United States introduced a layer of complexity for manufacturers and buyers of sealing solutions, prompting strategic adaptation across the value chain. These measures elevated the importance of supply chain mapping and cost-to-serve analysis, forcing many procurement teams to reassess supplier footprints and alternative sourcing pathways. In response, firms accelerated supplier qualification programs in lower-risk jurisdictions and expanded inventory buffering strategically to ensure uninterrupted operations.
The tariffs also incentivized nearshoring and reshoring initiatives, particularly for mission‑critical components where lead times and reliability outweigh incremental cost increases. As a result, engineering teams and sourcing leaders collaborated more closely to redesign components for manufacturability with local supply bases, thereby reducing tariff exposure and improving responsiveness. Compliance burdens rose as companies implemented enhanced tariff classification, origin documentation and duty mitigation strategies such as Free Trade Agreement utilization and bonded inventory management.
Manufacturers with integrated aftermarket capabilities and localized pre-assembly options mitigated margin pressure by offering bundled service contracts and value-added inventory programs. Overall, while tariffs created short-term cost and administrative burdens, they also accelerated structural adjustments-diversifying supplier networks, strengthening domestic production capabilities, and elevating the strategic role of design-to-cost initiatives in long-term competitiveness.
Insightful segmentation analysis revealing where product types, material choices, industry applications, and channel strategies create differentiated commercial and engineering imperatives
Segmentation reveals where technical requirements and commercial behaviors diverge, and thus where suppliers can differentiate through product design, material expertise and channel strategy. Product type distinctions between gaskets and seals shape manufacturing processes and go-to-market approaches: gaskets that include envelope, jacketed, ring joint, sheet and spiral wound variants demand expertise in flange standards and static sealing, whereas seals composed of mechanical seals, O rings, oil seals, U cup seals and U seals focus on dynamic performance, shaft tolerances and elastomeric resilience.
Material segmentation further informs R&D and inventory strategies. Composite, graphite, metal, PTFE and rubber materials each present distinct handling, testing and certification requirements that influence lead times and supplier capital intensity. End use industry segmentation clarifies demand drivers and regulatory regimes: aerospace & defense prioritizes traceability and certification, automotive weighs cost and volume, chemical & petrochemical stress-tests corrosion resistance, construction & OEM emphasize installation simplicity, oil & gas demands extreme condition durability, and power generation stresses long lifecycle reliability.
Distribution channel choices change commercial economics. OEM relationships require collaborative design cycles and long-term qualification, while aftermarket channels-direct, distributor and ecommerce-drive different service levels and inventory models. Suppliers that align product engineering with material mastery and channel-specific value propositions capture higher lifetime value and reduce warranty risk.
Comparative regional insights showing how the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific each define unique demand drivers, regulatory priorities, and supply chain strategies
Regional dynamics shape demand patterns, regulatory contexts and supply chain options in distinct ways. The Americas exhibit a strong emphasis on reshoring and aftermarket services, driven by energy sector investments and a preference for locally sourced critical components; as a result, suppliers that can offer quick-turn manufacturing and inventory programs tend to secure long-term contracts with industrial customers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa reflect a blend of advanced regulatory standards, mature automotive and power generation markets, and energy-rich economies that require highly engineered sealing solutions. In these markets, certifications, materials compliance and distributor networks play an outsize role in commercial success, and relationships with channel partners often determine access to large industrial accounts.
Asia-Pacific remains a dual-paced region where rapid industrialization and automotive growth coexist with highly cost-competitive manufacturing hubs. Suppliers that balance local operational efficiency with global quality standards and that invest in service infrastructure to support OEMs and aftermarket channels are best positioned to benefit from both high-volume production and emerging demand for higher-performance materials.
How competitive advantage is increasingly defined by materials expertise, integrated aftermarket services, and strategic consolidation that expands technical reach and regional footprint
Competitive dynamics center on reliability, technical depth, and the ability to offer integrated services beyond discrete components. Leading firms prioritize investments in materials science, accelerated new-product introduction, and automated quality assurance to reduce variability and warranty exposure. In parallel, a subset of suppliers differentiate through aftermarket service platforms that combine predictive maintenance, inventory-as-a-service and rapid-response logistics to create stickier customer relationships.
Consolidation continues among mid-sized suppliers seeking scale to support R&D and to achieve broader geographic reach, while specialized manufacturers deepen vertical expertise in high-value niches such as high-temperature composites or complex spiral wound seals. Strategic partnerships between materials innovators and precision fabricators shorten time-to-market for advanced solutions, and distributors that adopt digital storefronts and data-driven stocking optimize turnover and reduce obsolescence risk.
Talent and process capabilities emerge as competitive gates. Organizations that implement robust training programs for sealing design, materials testing and failure analysis reduce time-to-qualification for new customers. Similarly, those that integrate engineering, quality and commercial teams deliver higher customer lifetime value through coordinated project execution and improved first-pass yield.
Actionable recommendations for leaders to accelerate material innovation, redesign supply networks for resilience, and monetize aftermarket services while improving commercial execution
Industry leaders should adopt a multidimensional action plan that addresses technical innovation, supply chain resilience and commercial model evolution. First, accelerate material and design innovation programs that emphasize durability under stress conditions and compatibility with digital monitoring, because product differentiation increasingly hinges on demonstrable lifecycle performance. Integrate failure-mode data into iterative product development to shorten qualification cycles and improve first-pass success rates.
Second, redesign supply chain strategies to include diversified, risk-ranked supplier tiers and regional manufacturing options for mission-critical components. Establish cross-functional teams that align sourcing, engineering and logistics to enable rapid supplier onboarding and localized assembly where tariffs or lead-time constraints apply. Complement these efforts with duty mitigation strategies and bonded inventory solutions to preserve margin and ensure continuity.
Third, expand aftermarket and service offerings by bundling condition-based maintenance, inventory programs and expedited replacement options. Invest in digital tools that surface actionable asset health insights and enable subscription-based revenue streams. Finally, strengthen channel partnerships through co-investment in training, joint quality standards and shared forecasting to improve fill rates and reduce inventory carrying costs.
Transparent research methodology combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical literature analysis, and iterative validation to ensure robust and actionable insights for decision-makers
The research approach combined qualitative expert interviews, technical literature review, and systematic validation through cross-functional industry panels. Primary interviews included procurement leaders, design engineers, aftermarket managers and distributor executives to capture firsthand perspectives on supply chain risk, material performance and commercial expectations. These qualitative inputs grounded hypotheses about demand drivers and product segmentation.
Secondary sources comprised technical journals, regulatory guidance documents and manufacturer product literature to verify materials behavior, certification requirements and manufacturing capabilities. Data triangulation ensured that conclusions reflected consistent observations across multiple stakeholders, and iterative validation sessions with industry practitioners refined the interpretation of trends and implications for manufacturers and buyers.
Methodological rigor included standardized interview protocols, coding of qualitative themes, and scenario analysis to test strategic responses under different trade and supply shock conditions. The study prioritized transparency in assumptions and captured limitations where variance in regional regulations or proprietary supplier practices could influence local outcomes.
A concise strategic conclusion emphasizing the need to fuse engineering excellence with commercial agility to secure market relevance and operational resilience
In conclusion, the gaskets and seals sector is at a pivotal juncture where technical innovation, shifting trade dynamics, and evolving buyer expectations are converging to reorder competitive advantage. Suppliers that invest in material science, shorten new-product introduction cycles, and expand service-oriented offerings will capture disproportionate value in both OEM and aftermarket channels. Equally, companies that proactively redesign supply chains to manage tariff exposure and to localize critical production reduce operational vulnerability and improve customer responsiveness.
The strategic imperative is clear: integrate engineering excellence with commercial agility. By doing so, organizations can transform sealing components from commoditized parts into strategic enablers of asset reliability and operational efficiency. Stakeholders who adopt the recommendations outlined here will be better positioned to navigate uncertainty and to convert technical capability into sustained market relevance.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of additive manufacturing techniques for customized gasket production at scale
- 5.2. Deployment of IoT-enabled sensors in seals for predictive condition monitoring in machinery
- 5.3. Shift towards bio-based and recyclable gasket materials driven by circular economy initiatives
- 5.4. Development of high-performance seals compatible with hydrogen fuel cell and electrolyzer systems
- 5.5. Implementation of AI-driven design optimization for bespoke sealing solutions in complex machinery
- 5.6. Proliferation of self-healing elastomeric seals to reduce maintenance intervals and downtime
- 5.7. Rising demand for ultralight composite gaskets in aerospace applications to enhance fuel efficiency
- 5.8. Expansion of antimicrobial sealing technologies for infection control in medical and food processing
- 5.9. Increasing regulatory pressures on fluoropolymer seal usage prompting alternative material development
- 5.10. Integration of digital twins for real-time simulation and performance analysis of sealing systems
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Gaskets & Seals Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Gaskets
- 8.1.1. Envelope
- 8.1.2. Jacketed
- 8.1.3. Ring Joint
- 8.1.4. Sheet
- 8.1.5. Spiral Wound
- 8.2. Seals
- 8.2.1. Mechanical Seals
- 8.2.2. O Rings
- 8.2.3. Oil Seals
- 8.2.4. U Cup Seals
- 8.2.5. U Seals
- 9. Gaskets & Seals Market, by Material
- 9.1. Composite
- 9.2. Graphite
- 9.3. Metal
- 9.4. PTFE
- 9.5. Rubber
- 10. Gaskets & Seals Market, by Distribution Channel
- 10.1. Aftermarket
- 10.1.1. Direct
- 10.1.2. Distributor
- 10.1.3. Ecommerce
- 10.2. OEM
- 11. Gaskets & Seals Market, by End Use Industry
- 11.1. Aerospace & Defense
- 11.2. Automotive
- 11.3. Chemical & Petrochemical
- 11.4. Construction & OEM
- 11.5. Oil & Gas
- 11.6. Power Generation
- 12. Gaskets & Seals Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Gaskets & Seals Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Gaskets & Seals Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Armacell LLC
- 15.3.2. Banco Products (I) Ltd.
- 15.3.3. Boyd Corporation
- 15.3.4. Bruss Sealing System GmbH
- 15.3.5. CGR Products
- 15.3.6. Champion Seals India Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.7. Crown Gaskets Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.8. Custom Gasket Manufacturing
- 15.3.9. Dätwyler Holding Inc.
- 15.3.10. Economy Die & Gasket, Inc.
- 15.3.11. ElringKlinger AG
- 15.3.12. Erith Group
- 15.3.13. Flexitallic, GmbH
- 15.3.14. Flowserve Corporation
- 15.3.15. Freudenberg FST GmbH
- 15.3.16. Garlock, an Enpro Company
- 15.3.17. Gasket Express
- 15.3.18. James Walker Group Limited
- 15.3.19. Magnum Diesel Parts
- 15.3.20. Mercer Gasket & Shim
- 15.3.21. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
- 15.3.22. Saunders, A Division of R.S. Hughes Co., Inc.
- 15.3.23. Sealing Devices Inc.
- 15.3.24. SKF Group
- 15.3.25. Smiths Group PLC
- 15.3.26. Teadit
- 15.3.27. Technetics Group
- 15.3.28. Tenneco Inc.
- 15.3.29. Trelleborg AB
- 15.3.30. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
- 15.3.31. XTO, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
