Friction Products Market by Product Type (Product Type), Material (Ceramic, Metallic, Organic), Distribution Channel, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Friction Products Market was valued at USD 13.38 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 14.28 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.78%, reaching USD 22.63 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation to friction products dynamics that clarifies performance imperatives, supply pressures, and the strategic context for procurement and R&D decisions
The friction products sector underpins critical safety, performance, and reliability outcomes across transportation, aerospace, and heavy industrial applications. This executive summary provides a concise orientation to current drivers, material innovations, distribution dynamics, and regulatory forces that are shaping supplier decisions and downstream engineering specifications. By clarifying the dominant performance vectors - such as thermal stability, wear resistance, and environmental tolerances - the opening section frames how operational imperatives intersect with procurement constraints and product development roadmaps.
In addition, this introduction positions the subsequent analysis to help decision-makers discern where technological substitution, supply chain reshoring, and material science breakthroughs are most likely to change design criteria. Contextualizing the discussion with attention to end-use safety requirements and lifecycle cost considerations establishes a foundation for the deeper technical and commercial insights that follow. The aim here is to orient leadership teams toward pragmatic choices that balance immediate operational needs with medium-term resilience and product innovation.
How material innovation, standards evolution, and supply chain digitization are jointly redefining performance requirements and commercial models across friction product value chains
The landscape for friction products is undergoing a period of accelerated transformation driven by intersecting technological, regulatory, and supply chain trends. Advances in material formulations, particularly in ceramics and engineered metallic composites, are changing the trade-offs between braking performance and wear longevity while also enabling lighter, higher-temperature-tolerant components that meet evolving vehicle electrification and aerospace weight-reduction targets. Simultaneously, digitization across manufacturing and testing is enabling tighter process control and traceability, which elevates vendor expectations for quality assurance and data transparency.
Regulatory pressure on emissions and safety standards is prompting design teams to reassess compatibility with new propulsion systems, while procurement organizations are increasingly prioritizing supplier resilience, nearshoring, and multi-tier visibility. These shifts are not isolated; they reinforce one another. For example, material innovation reduces maintenance intervals, which in turn alters aftermarket service models and distribution needs. Taken together, these transformative dynamics demand coordinated responses from product development, sourcing, and aftermarket strategy functions to sustain performance under a rapidly evolving risk and opportunity profile.
The cumulative effects of 2025 tariff measures on supply networks, procurement tactics, and long-term supplier selection criteria within the friction products ecosystem
Recent tariff actions enacted by United States authorities in 2025 have produced layered consequences for manufacturers, assemblers, and purchasers of friction products that reverberate through cost structures and sourcing strategies. Tariffs have disrupted established import flows for raw materials and finished components, prompting procurement teams to reassess supplier portfolios and accelerate qualification of alternative vendors in lower-tariff jurisdictions. This has increased near-term transactional complexity as cross-border logistics, duty mitigation, and compliance verification absorb more organizational attention and working capital resources.
Moreover, the tariffs have encouraged strategic reconfiguration of inventory policies and contractual terms, with firms extending safety stock and negotiating long-term agreements to stabilize input availability. For manufacturers, the incremental cost pressures have heightened incentives to invest in process efficiencies and material substitutions that deliver equivalent performance at lower duty exposure. Over time, these responses can alter the composition of supply ecosystems by favoring domestic capacity expansions and regional suppliers that offer lower trade friction. Importantly, the cumulative impact goes beyond pricing: it reshapes the tempo of product development, supplier relationships, and cross-border collaboration in ways that emphasize resilience and regulatory agility.
Detailed segmentation-driven perspectives that connect product families, material science distinctions, end-use certification needs, and distribution pathways to strategic priorities
Segmentation analysis reveals how product, material, end-use, and distribution distinctions map to distinct technical requirements and commercial behaviors for friction products. Based on product type, technical design and testing priorities differ substantially among Block, Disc, Liner, and Pads; each product family presents unique thermal management and wear profiles that guide engineering tolerances and after-sales service models. Based on material, differentiation emerges between Ceramic, Metallic, and Organic formulations; Ceramic variants further subdivide into Aluminum Oxide and Silicon Carbide, each offering different hardness and thermal conductivity characteristics, while Metallic options span Cast Iron, Sintered Metal, and Steel with divergent machining and fatigue properties, and Organic materials consist of Fiber, Resin, and Rubber blends that emphasize damping and noise characteristics.
Based on end use industry, performance thresholds and certification regimes vary across Aerospace, Automotive, Industrial Machinery, and Rail, demanding tailored validation protocols and traceability frameworks for each segment. Based on distribution channel, the dynamics between Offline and Online channels influence lead times, technical support expectations, and the role of intermediaries; Offline channels further break down into Direct Sales, Distributor, and OEM pathways, each shaping service-level agreements, warranty structures, and collaborative product development opportunities. Integrating these segmentation lenses helps teams prioritize investment across R&D, quality systems, and commercial channels according to where technical differentiation and margin potential intersect with customer procurement behavior.
A regional synthesis of supply resilience, regulatory complexity, and innovation hubs that determines where manufacturers should prioritize capacity, certification, and partnerships
Regional dynamics shape supply chain resilience, regulatory exposure, and innovation ecosystems in markedly different ways across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, proximity to major automotive clusters and a growing emphasis on supply chain resilience have catalyzed investments in localized production capabilities and supplier consolidation strategies; this region’s regulatory and procurement environment often rewards traceability and rapid technical support for large fleet operators.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory mosaic and stringent safety standards frequently necessitate elevated compliance investments, while well-established OEM ecosystems enable deep specialization in high-performance ceramic and metallic solutions. The Asia-Pacific region remains a center for high-volume manufacturing and rapid material innovation, supported by integrated supply chains and intense cost competition, which encourages scale-driven process improvements and variant proliferation. Taken together, these regional currents inform where companies prioritize capacity expansions, certification efforts, and partner ecosystems to align with differentiated customer needs and geopolitical risk profiles.
How technical differentiation, targeted partnerships, and hybrid distribution models are shaping competitive advantage among leading and emerging friction component manufacturers
Competitive dynamics among leading firms in the friction products arena emphasize technical differentiation, integrated supply capabilities, and service-oriented commercial models. Industry leaders are investing in proprietary material formulations, enhanced testing platforms, and expanded aftermarket offerings that bundle predictive maintenance data and longer service intervals. These capabilities support closer collaboration with OEMs and fleet operators who demand consistent performance and lifecycle transparency. At the same time, mid-tier suppliers are carving out profitable positions by focusing on niche material expertise or regional service excellence that meets localized regulatory and aftermarket needs.
Strategic partnerships, joint development agreements, and targeted capacity investments are common approaches to managing technology risk and securing privileged access to raw material streams. Firms that succeed in this environment typically combine robust R&D pipelines with disciplined quality management and flexible manufacturing that can accommodate a range of material chemistries and product geometries. In addition, distribution strategies that integrate direct sales for major accounts with selective use of distributors and digital channels for aftermarket replacement parts create diversified revenue pathways that enhance resilience against demand volatility.
Practical steps to align material qualification, sourcing resilience, digital traceability, and hybrid distribution to lock in performance advantages and operational agility
Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of actions that align material innovation, supplier resilience, and commercial model evolution to secure long-term competitive advantage. First, accelerate material qualification programs that prioritize ceramic and advanced metallic composites with demonstrable gains in thermal stability and wear performance while also assessing organic formulations for noise and vibration control. Simultaneously, develop multi-sourcing strategies and regional manufacturing footprints to reduce tariff exposure and compress lead times for critical accounts.
Next, integrate digital traceability and predictive analytics into quality systems to offer customers verifiable lifecycle data and to enable condition-based maintenance services that create recurring revenue streams. Additionally, align distribution approaches by combining direct OEM engagement for co-development with selective distributor partnerships and enhanced online ordering for aftermarket parts. Finally, invest in cross-functional training and rapid supplier qualification protocols so that procurement, engineering, and quality functions can respond quickly to regulatory shifts or supply interruptions. These pragmatic steps will position firms to capture incremental performance advantages while lowering operational risk.
A triangulated research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical standards review, and supply chain mapping to produce validated, decision-ready insights
The research underpinning this executive summary relied on a triangulated methodology that combined primary interviews, technical literature synthesis, and supply chain mapping to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary engagement included structured interviews with engineering leads, procurement executives, and aftermarket managers across relevant end-use segments, enabling a multi-stakeholder view of performance requirements and purchasing behavior. Complementing this, technical literature and standards documentation were analyzed to validate material property claims and certification requirements, ensuring that formulation performance assertions align with industry testing protocols.
Supply chain mapping and policy analysis traced flows of critical raw materials and examined tariff impacts on typical bilateral trade lanes, allowing the study to identify likely points of vulnerability and practical mitigation measures. Where appropriate, scenario-based sensitivity analysis was applied to evaluate strategic options for sourcing and capacity allocation, and findings were cross-checked through peer review with subject matter experts to ensure coherence and applicability for decision-makers.
Executive conclusions that link material innovation, supply resilience, and digital service models to sustained competitiveness in the evolving friction products sector
In closing, the friction products sector requires integrated responses that marry material science progress with pragmatic supply chain and commercial strategies. Organizations that focus on validated material substitutes, improved process control, and strengthened multi-regional supplier relationships are better positioned to maintain operational continuity and deliver consistent performance to end users. At the same time, digitization of quality records and the adoption of predictive service offerings can transform aftermarket relationships into strategic assets that differentiate suppliers on service and total cost of ownership rather than price alone.
Leaders should treat regulatory shifts and trade measures as catalysts for strategic renewal rather than purely as cost pressures, using them to justify investments in resilience and higher-value product development. By combining disciplined procurement, targeted R&D, and adaptive distribution models, firms can navigate near-term disruptions while building the capabilities required to compete effectively in an environment of accelerating technical and geopolitical change.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to friction products dynamics that clarifies performance imperatives, supply pressures, and the strategic context for procurement and R&D decisions
The friction products sector underpins critical safety, performance, and reliability outcomes across transportation, aerospace, and heavy industrial applications. This executive summary provides a concise orientation to current drivers, material innovations, distribution dynamics, and regulatory forces that are shaping supplier decisions and downstream engineering specifications. By clarifying the dominant performance vectors - such as thermal stability, wear resistance, and environmental tolerances - the opening section frames how operational imperatives intersect with procurement constraints and product development roadmaps.
In addition, this introduction positions the subsequent analysis to help decision-makers discern where technological substitution, supply chain reshoring, and material science breakthroughs are most likely to change design criteria. Contextualizing the discussion with attention to end-use safety requirements and lifecycle cost considerations establishes a foundation for the deeper technical and commercial insights that follow. The aim here is to orient leadership teams toward pragmatic choices that balance immediate operational needs with medium-term resilience and product innovation.
How material innovation, standards evolution, and supply chain digitization are jointly redefining performance requirements and commercial models across friction product value chains
The landscape for friction products is undergoing a period of accelerated transformation driven by intersecting technological, regulatory, and supply chain trends. Advances in material formulations, particularly in ceramics and engineered metallic composites, are changing the trade-offs between braking performance and wear longevity while also enabling lighter, higher-temperature-tolerant components that meet evolving vehicle electrification and aerospace weight-reduction targets. Simultaneously, digitization across manufacturing and testing is enabling tighter process control and traceability, which elevates vendor expectations for quality assurance and data transparency.
Regulatory pressure on emissions and safety standards is prompting design teams to reassess compatibility with new propulsion systems, while procurement organizations are increasingly prioritizing supplier resilience, nearshoring, and multi-tier visibility. These shifts are not isolated; they reinforce one another. For example, material innovation reduces maintenance intervals, which in turn alters aftermarket service models and distribution needs. Taken together, these transformative dynamics demand coordinated responses from product development, sourcing, and aftermarket strategy functions to sustain performance under a rapidly evolving risk and opportunity profile.
The cumulative effects of 2025 tariff measures on supply networks, procurement tactics, and long-term supplier selection criteria within the friction products ecosystem
Recent tariff actions enacted by United States authorities in 2025 have produced layered consequences for manufacturers, assemblers, and purchasers of friction products that reverberate through cost structures and sourcing strategies. Tariffs have disrupted established import flows for raw materials and finished components, prompting procurement teams to reassess supplier portfolios and accelerate qualification of alternative vendors in lower-tariff jurisdictions. This has increased near-term transactional complexity as cross-border logistics, duty mitigation, and compliance verification absorb more organizational attention and working capital resources.
Moreover, the tariffs have encouraged strategic reconfiguration of inventory policies and contractual terms, with firms extending safety stock and negotiating long-term agreements to stabilize input availability. For manufacturers, the incremental cost pressures have heightened incentives to invest in process efficiencies and material substitutions that deliver equivalent performance at lower duty exposure. Over time, these responses can alter the composition of supply ecosystems by favoring domestic capacity expansions and regional suppliers that offer lower trade friction. Importantly, the cumulative impact goes beyond pricing: it reshapes the tempo of product development, supplier relationships, and cross-border collaboration in ways that emphasize resilience and regulatory agility.
Detailed segmentation-driven perspectives that connect product families, material science distinctions, end-use certification needs, and distribution pathways to strategic priorities
Segmentation analysis reveals how product, material, end-use, and distribution distinctions map to distinct technical requirements and commercial behaviors for friction products. Based on product type, technical design and testing priorities differ substantially among Block, Disc, Liner, and Pads; each product family presents unique thermal management and wear profiles that guide engineering tolerances and after-sales service models. Based on material, differentiation emerges between Ceramic, Metallic, and Organic formulations; Ceramic variants further subdivide into Aluminum Oxide and Silicon Carbide, each offering different hardness and thermal conductivity characteristics, while Metallic options span Cast Iron, Sintered Metal, and Steel with divergent machining and fatigue properties, and Organic materials consist of Fiber, Resin, and Rubber blends that emphasize damping and noise characteristics.
Based on end use industry, performance thresholds and certification regimes vary across Aerospace, Automotive, Industrial Machinery, and Rail, demanding tailored validation protocols and traceability frameworks for each segment. Based on distribution channel, the dynamics between Offline and Online channels influence lead times, technical support expectations, and the role of intermediaries; Offline channels further break down into Direct Sales, Distributor, and OEM pathways, each shaping service-level agreements, warranty structures, and collaborative product development opportunities. Integrating these segmentation lenses helps teams prioritize investment across R&D, quality systems, and commercial channels according to where technical differentiation and margin potential intersect with customer procurement behavior.
A regional synthesis of supply resilience, regulatory complexity, and innovation hubs that determines where manufacturers should prioritize capacity, certification, and partnerships
Regional dynamics shape supply chain resilience, regulatory exposure, and innovation ecosystems in markedly different ways across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, proximity to major automotive clusters and a growing emphasis on supply chain resilience have catalyzed investments in localized production capabilities and supplier consolidation strategies; this region’s regulatory and procurement environment often rewards traceability and rapid technical support for large fleet operators.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory mosaic and stringent safety standards frequently necessitate elevated compliance investments, while well-established OEM ecosystems enable deep specialization in high-performance ceramic and metallic solutions. The Asia-Pacific region remains a center for high-volume manufacturing and rapid material innovation, supported by integrated supply chains and intense cost competition, which encourages scale-driven process improvements and variant proliferation. Taken together, these regional currents inform where companies prioritize capacity expansions, certification efforts, and partner ecosystems to align with differentiated customer needs and geopolitical risk profiles.
How technical differentiation, targeted partnerships, and hybrid distribution models are shaping competitive advantage among leading and emerging friction component manufacturers
Competitive dynamics among leading firms in the friction products arena emphasize technical differentiation, integrated supply capabilities, and service-oriented commercial models. Industry leaders are investing in proprietary material formulations, enhanced testing platforms, and expanded aftermarket offerings that bundle predictive maintenance data and longer service intervals. These capabilities support closer collaboration with OEMs and fleet operators who demand consistent performance and lifecycle transparency. At the same time, mid-tier suppliers are carving out profitable positions by focusing on niche material expertise or regional service excellence that meets localized regulatory and aftermarket needs.
Strategic partnerships, joint development agreements, and targeted capacity investments are common approaches to managing technology risk and securing privileged access to raw material streams. Firms that succeed in this environment typically combine robust R&D pipelines with disciplined quality management and flexible manufacturing that can accommodate a range of material chemistries and product geometries. In addition, distribution strategies that integrate direct sales for major accounts with selective use of distributors and digital channels for aftermarket replacement parts create diversified revenue pathways that enhance resilience against demand volatility.
Practical steps to align material qualification, sourcing resilience, digital traceability, and hybrid distribution to lock in performance advantages and operational agility
Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of actions that align material innovation, supplier resilience, and commercial model evolution to secure long-term competitive advantage. First, accelerate material qualification programs that prioritize ceramic and advanced metallic composites with demonstrable gains in thermal stability and wear performance while also assessing organic formulations for noise and vibration control. Simultaneously, develop multi-sourcing strategies and regional manufacturing footprints to reduce tariff exposure and compress lead times for critical accounts.
Next, integrate digital traceability and predictive analytics into quality systems to offer customers verifiable lifecycle data and to enable condition-based maintenance services that create recurring revenue streams. Additionally, align distribution approaches by combining direct OEM engagement for co-development with selective distributor partnerships and enhanced online ordering for aftermarket parts. Finally, invest in cross-functional training and rapid supplier qualification protocols so that procurement, engineering, and quality functions can respond quickly to regulatory shifts or supply interruptions. These pragmatic steps will position firms to capture incremental performance advantages while lowering operational risk.
A triangulated research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical standards review, and supply chain mapping to produce validated, decision-ready insights
The research underpinning this executive summary relied on a triangulated methodology that combined primary interviews, technical literature synthesis, and supply chain mapping to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary engagement included structured interviews with engineering leads, procurement executives, and aftermarket managers across relevant end-use segments, enabling a multi-stakeholder view of performance requirements and purchasing behavior. Complementing this, technical literature and standards documentation were analyzed to validate material property claims and certification requirements, ensuring that formulation performance assertions align with industry testing protocols.
Supply chain mapping and policy analysis traced flows of critical raw materials and examined tariff impacts on typical bilateral trade lanes, allowing the study to identify likely points of vulnerability and practical mitigation measures. Where appropriate, scenario-based sensitivity analysis was applied to evaluate strategic options for sourcing and capacity allocation, and findings were cross-checked through peer review with subject matter experts to ensure coherence and applicability for decision-makers.
Executive conclusions that link material innovation, supply resilience, and digital service models to sustained competitiveness in the evolving friction products sector
In closing, the friction products sector requires integrated responses that marry material science progress with pragmatic supply chain and commercial strategies. Organizations that focus on validated material substitutes, improved process control, and strengthened multi-regional supplier relationships are better positioned to maintain operational continuity and deliver consistent performance to end users. At the same time, digitization of quality records and the adoption of predictive service offerings can transform aftermarket relationships into strategic assets that differentiate suppliers on service and total cost of ownership rather than price alone.
Leaders should treat regulatory shifts and trade measures as catalysts for strategic renewal rather than purely as cost pressures, using them to justify investments in resilience and higher-value product development. By combining disciplined procurement, targeted R&D, and adaptive distribution models, firms can navigate near-term disruptions while building the capabilities required to compete effectively in an environment of accelerating technical and geopolitical change.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
188 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rise of low-emission, low-dust brake materials driven by stricter environmental regulations
- 5.2. Integration of sensor-enabled friction components for real-time performance monitoring
- 5.3. Shift towards bio-based and recycled composite materials in friction pad manufacturing
- 5.4. Increasing adoption of carbon-ceramic brake systems in high-performance vehicles
- 5.5. Impact of global supply chain reconfiguration on raw material availability for friction products
- 5.6. Advancements in 3D printing for custom and complex friction component geometries
- 5.7. Demand growth for smart predictive maintenance platforms in industrial braking systems
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Friction Products Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Product Type
- 8.1.1. Braking Friction Products
- 8.1.1.1. Disc Brake Pads
- 8.1.1.2. Drum Brake Linings And Shoes
- 8.1.1.3. Brake Discs And Rotors
- 8.1.1.4. Brake Blocks And Tiles
- 8.1.2. Clutch Friction Products
- 8.1.2.1. Clutch Facings
- 8.1.2.2. Clutch Plates
- 8.1.2.3. Transmission And Torque Converter Discs
- 8.1.3. Industrial Friction Materials
- 8.1.3.1. Industrial Brake Pads And Linings
- 8.1.3.2. Friction Rolls And Sheets
- 8.1.3.3. Friction Segments And Blocks
- 8.1.4. Miscellaneous Friction Components
- 8.1.4.1. Band Brakes
- 8.1.4.2. Cone And Plate Clutches
- 8.1.4.3. Customized Friction Components
- 9. Friction Products Market, by Material
- 9.1. Ceramic
- 9.1.1. Aluminum Oxide
- 9.1.2. Silicon Carbide
- 9.2. Metallic
- 9.2.1. Cast Iron
- 9.2.2. Sintered Metal
- 9.2.3. Steel
- 9.3. Organic
- 9.3.1. Fiber
- 9.3.2. Resin
- 9.3.3. Rubber
- 10. Friction Products Market, by Distribution Channel
- 10.1. Offline
- 10.1.1. Direct Sales
- 10.1.2. Distributor
- 10.1.3. OEM
- 10.2. Online
- 11. Friction Products Market, by End Use Industry
- 11.1. Aerospace
- 11.2. Automotive
- 11.3. Industrial Machinery
- 11.4. Rail
- 12. Friction Products Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Friction Products Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Friction Products Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.2. Akebono Brake Industry Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.3. Brembo S.p.A.
- 15.3.4. Carlisle Brake & Friction, Inc.
- 15.3.5. China Automotive Brake Technology Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.6. Continental AG
- 15.3.7. Fras-le S.A.
- 15.3.8. Goetze GmbH & Co. KG
- 15.3.9. Hindustan Composites Ltd.
- 15.3.10. Hitachi Chemical Company, Ltd.
- 15.3.11. ITT Inc.
- 15.3.12. Japan Brake Industrial Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.13. Mando Corporation
- 15.3.14. Miba AG
- 15.3.15. Nisshinbo Holdings Inc.
- 15.3.16. Rane Brake Lining Limited
- 15.3.17. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 15.3.18. SGL Carbon SE
- 15.3.19. Tenneco Inc.
- 15.3.20. TMD Friction Holdings GmbH
- 15.3.21. ZF Friedrichshafen AG
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
