Food Irradiation Market by Source (Electron Beam, Gamma, X-Ray), Food Type (Fruits & Vegetables, Meat & Poultry, Seafood), Application, Dose, Form - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Food Irradiation Market was valued at USD 637.61 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 681.21 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.69%, reaching USD 1,070.46 million by 2032.
Framing the modern role of irradiation in food safety and supply chain resilience as stakeholders navigate technology, regulation, and commercial adoption
Food irradiation has evolved from a specialized laboratory process into a pivotal tool within contemporary food safety and supply chain resilience strategies. Advances in irradiation science, coupled with shifting regulatory frameworks and heightened consumer concerns about foodborne disease and postharvest loss, have placed ionizing radiation technologies under renewed scrutiny by producers, distributors, and policymakers. Recent developments in equipment design, dose control, and logistics integration have made irradiation more adaptable to diverse commodities and processing footprints, and stakeholders are increasingly evaluating its role beyond sterilization to include quarantine treatment, disinfestation, and shelf-life extension.
As a result, decision-makers across the value chain are reappraising the role of electron beam, gamma, and x-ray modalities relative to traditional phytosanitary and cold-chain interventions. This reassessment is driven by a desire to secure cross-border trade continuity, reduce microbial risk in fresh and minimally processed foods, and address labor constraints in postharvest operations. Moreover, the maturation of regulatory guidance in multiple jurisdictions and the gradual expansion of acceptable food categories for irradiation are providing clearer pathways for commercial deployment. In this introductory context, the narrative that follows examines technological inflection points, tariff-driven trade dynamics, segmentation-specific implications, regional differentiators, and practical recommendations for industry participants intent on translating irradiation capability into competitive advantage.
How converging technology upgrades, regulatory modernization, and commercial procurement priorities are reshaping the strategic value of food irradiation
The landscape of food irradiation is undergoing transformative shifts as innovation intersects with shifting regulatory priorities and evolving trade environments. Technological advances in source management, dose accuracy, and modular equipment design are making electron beam and x-ray systems more viable for decentralized processing, while improvements in handling and logistics are reducing non-technology frictions that historically hindered adoption. At the same time, greater scientific clarity about pathogen inactivation kinetics and spice decontamination has expanded the practical applications of irradiation from narrow quarantine use to broader postharvest interventions that can preserve quality and reduce waste.
Regulatory modernization in several jurisdictions has streamlined approval pathways for certain irradiated food categories, enabling pilot deployments that generate real-world evidence on consumer perception and organoleptic outcomes. Concurrently, private-sector actors-particularly retailers and global food processors-are initiating supplier requirements that emphasize demonstrable microbial controls and transparent cold-chain practices, elevating irradiation as a compelling complement to existing sanitation regimes. Market adoption patterns are also influenced by the growing integration of irradiation services into contract processing networks and by the emergence of financing structures that lower capital barriers for operators. Taken together, these shifts are redefining cost-benefit assessments and opening new commercial avenues for irradiation technologies across fresh, dried, and processed food segments.
Assessing how 2025 tariff adjustments altered operational routing, investment logic, and the resilience calculus for irradiation-enabled food trade
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 introduced tangible friction into the complex value chains that underpin global food trade, with distinct ramifications for irradiation-dependent commodities and service providers. Tariff adjustments raised landed costs and complicated routing decisions for exporters that rely on centralized irradiation facilities located in tariff-favored jurisdictions. As tariffs increased the relative cost of cross-border shipments, some exporters considered nearshoring irradiation capacity to mitigate tariff exposure and to shorten logistics lead times, while others explored alternative phytosanitary pathways to preserve market access.
These trade policy shifts also affected investment calculus for equipment vendors and service operators. Where import duties and export levies altered margins, decision-makers re-evaluated the business case for expanding irradiation capacity or for integrating irradiation into multi-step processing hubs. In some instances, tariff-driven disruptions accelerated the search for trade-compliant solutions such as domestic quarantine treatments or bilateral agreements that exempt certain products from punitive measures. Importantly, firms with flexible sourcing strategies-capable of redirecting shipments, reallocating inventory, or shifting processing across modalities-demonstrated greater resilience. Thus, the 2025 tariff environment underscored the strategic importance of supply chain agility, diversified processing footprints, and regulatory engagement to sustain irradiation-enabled trade lanes.
Integrating source modality, commodity type, application intent, dose regimes, and product form to reveal differentiated adoption pathways and operational imperatives
Segmentation analysis reveals how technological modality, product type, application, dose regimes, and product form collectively shape irradiation adoption pathways and operational priorities. Source distinctions among electron beam, gamma, and x-ray systems define capital intensity, throughput characteristics, and required safety infrastructure; within electron beam offerings, high-energy devices are favored for thicker products and higher penetration needs while low-energy systems suit surface treatment and high-throughput operations, and gamma sources segmented into cesium-137 and cobalt-60 present differing supply chain, regulatory and lifecycle considerations that influence site selection and licensing.
Food type segmentation-spanning fruits and vegetables, meat and poultry, seafood, and spices and seasonings-creates divergent requirements for dose control, quality retention, and sensory outcomes, requiring bespoke process validation and packaging strategies to maintain consumer acceptance. Applications such as disinfestation, quarantine treatment, shelf-life extension, sprout inhibition, and sterilization map to different dose regimes and validation protocols; low-dose treatments up to 1 kGy typically support surface disinfestation and insect control, medium-dose treatments from 1 to 10 kGy enable shelf-life and pathogen reductions for many perishables, while high-dose treatments above 10 kGy are reserved for sterilization and certain dried goods where microbial abatement is the priority. Finally, the physical form of the product-dried, fresh, frozen, or refrigerated-affects logistics sequencing, temperature management, and facility design, so operators must align source technology, dose strategy, and handling protocols to achieve the intended functional outcomes without compromising quality.
How distinct regional supply chain structures, regulatory postures, and trade priorities shape differential adoption pathways for irradiation technologies
Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on how irradiation technologies are adopted, regulated, and scaled across value chains, with distinct patterns observable across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, established cold-chain infrastructure, prevalence of large-scale exporters, and active private-sector procurement policies drive demand for irradiation as a complement to refrigeration and sanitary controls; regulatory clarity in certain markets has enabled pilot programs and broader supplier engagement, while decentralized service models address geographic dispersion of production.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, policy frameworks and consumer sentiment interplay with import standards and stringent food safety requirements to create a cautious but methodical pathway to irradiation use, particularly for spices and dried ingredients where irradiative decontamination offers demonstrable benefits. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific exhibits rapid heterogeneity: export-oriented production hubs prioritize quarantine and disinfestation treatments to preserve trade lanes, and large processing centers are investing in both electron beam and x-ray systems to improve throughput and reduce chemical fumigant reliance. Across regions, convergence is occurring around cross-border regulatory harmonization efforts, greater investment in diagnostic validation, and coordinated public-private research initiatives that seek to align safety evidence, trade facilitation, and consumer communication strategies.
Understanding the ecosystem of equipment makers, contract processors, integrators, and specialist service providers that enable scalable irradiation adoption
Companies operating across the irradiation ecosystem occupy roles that range from equipment manufacturers and engineering integrators to contract processors, logistics providers, and regulatory consultancies. Equipment vendors are concentrating on modular designs, energy efficiency, and automation to lower the threshold for entry by processors and to enable scalable deployments across distributed sites. Service providers and contract irradiation facilities are differentiating on throughput flexibility, traceability, and integration with cold-chain partners to offer turnkey solutions that minimize handling steps and preserve product integrity.
Complementing these operational actors, specialized consultancies and testing laboratories are increasingly important for dose validation, shelf-life studies, and regulatory dossier preparation. Financing partners and technology integrators play a role in structuring capital leases and performance-based agreements that make investments in irradiation infrastructure more attainable for mid-sized processors. Collectively, these company types are forming ecosystems that link equipment capability, service delivery, and compliance assurance, thereby enabling faster deployment cycles and reducing the operational friction associated with adopting ionizing radiation technologies in food processing environments.
Actionable steps for leaders to pilot irradiation, de-risk regulatory and financing barriers, and cultivate market acceptance to accelerate deployment
Industry leaders seeking to capitalize on irradiation technologies should pursue a sequence of strategic actions designed to reduce adoption friction and accelerate value capture. First, prioritize pilot programs that pair technology trials with robust sensory and shelf-life validation, thereby building internal evidence to support supplier requirements and retailer acceptance. Link these pilots to supply chain mapping exercises so that logistics constraints and handling steps are tested under operational conditions, and use the results to inform modular deployment decisions rather than committing to single large-scale facilities.
Second, engage proactively with regulators and trade partners to clarify acceptable products, dose metrics, and labeling expectations; early regulatory engagement reduces compliance uncertainty and shortens time-to-market for irradiated products. Third, consider flexible financing structures and service partnerships to mitigate capital intensity; contracting external irradiation services or pursuing lease-based equipment models can permit rapid scaling while preserving balance-sheet flexibility. Fourth, invest in consumer-facing transparency measures and third-party validation to address perception barriers; communicating the safety profile, quality outcomes, and environmental benefits-such as reduced food waste-can improve acceptance among critical buyers. Finally, embed contingency planning that addresses tariff volatility and supply disruptions by diversifying processing locations, building bilateral supplier relationships, and maintaining alternative phytosanitary options so that trade exposure is minimized under shifting policy regimes.
Methodological approach combining technical literature, primary stakeholder interviews, site observations, and comparative technology profiling to ensure actionable insights
The research underpinning this executive summary combines a structured review of technical literature, regulatory documents, and operational case studies with primary stakeholder interviews across the value chain. Secondary sources were systematically analyzed to establish technology characteristics, safety evidence, and supply chain considerations, while primary interviews with equipment engineers, contract processors, quality assurance leads, and regulatory affairs specialists provided context on deployment constraints and commercial strategies. Site visits and process observations informed assessments of throughput, handling protocols, and integration requirements for differing product forms.
Analytical methods included comparative technology profiling to contrast electron beam, gamma, and x-ray capabilities, application mapping to align dose regimes with end-use cases, and scenario-based supply chain analysis to capture the effects of tariff changes and logistics realignment. Validation steps involved cross-checking technical claims with laboratory test reports and corroborating regulatory interpretations with government guidance documents. Throughout, the methodology emphasized triangulation across data types and stakeholders to ensure conclusions reflect operational realities and are actionable for decision-makers seeking to implement or scale irradiation-enabled processes.
Concluding perspective on how integrated technical, regulatory, and commercial approaches will determine successful irradiation adoption across food value chains
In summary, irradiation technologies are transitioning from niche applications to strategic tools that can bolster food safety, reduce spoilage, and support trade continuity when aligned with appropriate dose regimes, product handling, and regulatory strategies. Technological improvements in modality flexibility and facility integration are lowering barriers to entry, while tariff and trade dynamics emphasize the need for supply chain agility and diversified processing footprints. Segmentation analysis demonstrates that adoption is not monolithic: source technology, commodity type, intended application, dose selection, and product form jointly determine operational requirements and value realization.
Looking forward, organizations that pursue evidence-driven pilots, engage proactively with regulators, and adopt flexible commercial arrangements will be better positioned to capture the benefits of irradiation while managing perception and compliance risks. Collaborative approaches that bring together equipment providers, contract processors, logistics partners, and independent validation labs will accelerate credible deployment. Ultimately, irradiation offers a practical complement to existing food safety and preservation strategies when implemented with attention to technical fit, regulatory alignment, and transparent stakeholder communication.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the modern role of irradiation in food safety and supply chain resilience as stakeholders navigate technology, regulation, and commercial adoption
Food irradiation has evolved from a specialized laboratory process into a pivotal tool within contemporary food safety and supply chain resilience strategies. Advances in irradiation science, coupled with shifting regulatory frameworks and heightened consumer concerns about foodborne disease and postharvest loss, have placed ionizing radiation technologies under renewed scrutiny by producers, distributors, and policymakers. Recent developments in equipment design, dose control, and logistics integration have made irradiation more adaptable to diverse commodities and processing footprints, and stakeholders are increasingly evaluating its role beyond sterilization to include quarantine treatment, disinfestation, and shelf-life extension.
As a result, decision-makers across the value chain are reappraising the role of electron beam, gamma, and x-ray modalities relative to traditional phytosanitary and cold-chain interventions. This reassessment is driven by a desire to secure cross-border trade continuity, reduce microbial risk in fresh and minimally processed foods, and address labor constraints in postharvest operations. Moreover, the maturation of regulatory guidance in multiple jurisdictions and the gradual expansion of acceptable food categories for irradiation are providing clearer pathways for commercial deployment. In this introductory context, the narrative that follows examines technological inflection points, tariff-driven trade dynamics, segmentation-specific implications, regional differentiators, and practical recommendations for industry participants intent on translating irradiation capability into competitive advantage.
How converging technology upgrades, regulatory modernization, and commercial procurement priorities are reshaping the strategic value of food irradiation
The landscape of food irradiation is undergoing transformative shifts as innovation intersects with shifting regulatory priorities and evolving trade environments. Technological advances in source management, dose accuracy, and modular equipment design are making electron beam and x-ray systems more viable for decentralized processing, while improvements in handling and logistics are reducing non-technology frictions that historically hindered adoption. At the same time, greater scientific clarity about pathogen inactivation kinetics and spice decontamination has expanded the practical applications of irradiation from narrow quarantine use to broader postharvest interventions that can preserve quality and reduce waste.
Regulatory modernization in several jurisdictions has streamlined approval pathways for certain irradiated food categories, enabling pilot deployments that generate real-world evidence on consumer perception and organoleptic outcomes. Concurrently, private-sector actors-particularly retailers and global food processors-are initiating supplier requirements that emphasize demonstrable microbial controls and transparent cold-chain practices, elevating irradiation as a compelling complement to existing sanitation regimes. Market adoption patterns are also influenced by the growing integration of irradiation services into contract processing networks and by the emergence of financing structures that lower capital barriers for operators. Taken together, these shifts are redefining cost-benefit assessments and opening new commercial avenues for irradiation technologies across fresh, dried, and processed food segments.
Assessing how 2025 tariff adjustments altered operational routing, investment logic, and the resilience calculus for irradiation-enabled food trade
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 introduced tangible friction into the complex value chains that underpin global food trade, with distinct ramifications for irradiation-dependent commodities and service providers. Tariff adjustments raised landed costs and complicated routing decisions for exporters that rely on centralized irradiation facilities located in tariff-favored jurisdictions. As tariffs increased the relative cost of cross-border shipments, some exporters considered nearshoring irradiation capacity to mitigate tariff exposure and to shorten logistics lead times, while others explored alternative phytosanitary pathways to preserve market access.
These trade policy shifts also affected investment calculus for equipment vendors and service operators. Where import duties and export levies altered margins, decision-makers re-evaluated the business case for expanding irradiation capacity or for integrating irradiation into multi-step processing hubs. In some instances, tariff-driven disruptions accelerated the search for trade-compliant solutions such as domestic quarantine treatments or bilateral agreements that exempt certain products from punitive measures. Importantly, firms with flexible sourcing strategies-capable of redirecting shipments, reallocating inventory, or shifting processing across modalities-demonstrated greater resilience. Thus, the 2025 tariff environment underscored the strategic importance of supply chain agility, diversified processing footprints, and regulatory engagement to sustain irradiation-enabled trade lanes.
Integrating source modality, commodity type, application intent, dose regimes, and product form to reveal differentiated adoption pathways and operational imperatives
Segmentation analysis reveals how technological modality, product type, application, dose regimes, and product form collectively shape irradiation adoption pathways and operational priorities. Source distinctions among electron beam, gamma, and x-ray systems define capital intensity, throughput characteristics, and required safety infrastructure; within electron beam offerings, high-energy devices are favored for thicker products and higher penetration needs while low-energy systems suit surface treatment and high-throughput operations, and gamma sources segmented into cesium-137 and cobalt-60 present differing supply chain, regulatory and lifecycle considerations that influence site selection and licensing.
Food type segmentation-spanning fruits and vegetables, meat and poultry, seafood, and spices and seasonings-creates divergent requirements for dose control, quality retention, and sensory outcomes, requiring bespoke process validation and packaging strategies to maintain consumer acceptance. Applications such as disinfestation, quarantine treatment, shelf-life extension, sprout inhibition, and sterilization map to different dose regimes and validation protocols; low-dose treatments up to 1 kGy typically support surface disinfestation and insect control, medium-dose treatments from 1 to 10 kGy enable shelf-life and pathogen reductions for many perishables, while high-dose treatments above 10 kGy are reserved for sterilization and certain dried goods where microbial abatement is the priority. Finally, the physical form of the product-dried, fresh, frozen, or refrigerated-affects logistics sequencing, temperature management, and facility design, so operators must align source technology, dose strategy, and handling protocols to achieve the intended functional outcomes without compromising quality.
How distinct regional supply chain structures, regulatory postures, and trade priorities shape differential adoption pathways for irradiation technologies
Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on how irradiation technologies are adopted, regulated, and scaled across value chains, with distinct patterns observable across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, established cold-chain infrastructure, prevalence of large-scale exporters, and active private-sector procurement policies drive demand for irradiation as a complement to refrigeration and sanitary controls; regulatory clarity in certain markets has enabled pilot programs and broader supplier engagement, while decentralized service models address geographic dispersion of production.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, policy frameworks and consumer sentiment interplay with import standards and stringent food safety requirements to create a cautious but methodical pathway to irradiation use, particularly for spices and dried ingredients where irradiative decontamination offers demonstrable benefits. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific exhibits rapid heterogeneity: export-oriented production hubs prioritize quarantine and disinfestation treatments to preserve trade lanes, and large processing centers are investing in both electron beam and x-ray systems to improve throughput and reduce chemical fumigant reliance. Across regions, convergence is occurring around cross-border regulatory harmonization efforts, greater investment in diagnostic validation, and coordinated public-private research initiatives that seek to align safety evidence, trade facilitation, and consumer communication strategies.
Understanding the ecosystem of equipment makers, contract processors, integrators, and specialist service providers that enable scalable irradiation adoption
Companies operating across the irradiation ecosystem occupy roles that range from equipment manufacturers and engineering integrators to contract processors, logistics providers, and regulatory consultancies. Equipment vendors are concentrating on modular designs, energy efficiency, and automation to lower the threshold for entry by processors and to enable scalable deployments across distributed sites. Service providers and contract irradiation facilities are differentiating on throughput flexibility, traceability, and integration with cold-chain partners to offer turnkey solutions that minimize handling steps and preserve product integrity.
Complementing these operational actors, specialized consultancies and testing laboratories are increasingly important for dose validation, shelf-life studies, and regulatory dossier preparation. Financing partners and technology integrators play a role in structuring capital leases and performance-based agreements that make investments in irradiation infrastructure more attainable for mid-sized processors. Collectively, these company types are forming ecosystems that link equipment capability, service delivery, and compliance assurance, thereby enabling faster deployment cycles and reducing the operational friction associated with adopting ionizing radiation technologies in food processing environments.
Actionable steps for leaders to pilot irradiation, de-risk regulatory and financing barriers, and cultivate market acceptance to accelerate deployment
Industry leaders seeking to capitalize on irradiation technologies should pursue a sequence of strategic actions designed to reduce adoption friction and accelerate value capture. First, prioritize pilot programs that pair technology trials with robust sensory and shelf-life validation, thereby building internal evidence to support supplier requirements and retailer acceptance. Link these pilots to supply chain mapping exercises so that logistics constraints and handling steps are tested under operational conditions, and use the results to inform modular deployment decisions rather than committing to single large-scale facilities.
Second, engage proactively with regulators and trade partners to clarify acceptable products, dose metrics, and labeling expectations; early regulatory engagement reduces compliance uncertainty and shortens time-to-market for irradiated products. Third, consider flexible financing structures and service partnerships to mitigate capital intensity; contracting external irradiation services or pursuing lease-based equipment models can permit rapid scaling while preserving balance-sheet flexibility. Fourth, invest in consumer-facing transparency measures and third-party validation to address perception barriers; communicating the safety profile, quality outcomes, and environmental benefits-such as reduced food waste-can improve acceptance among critical buyers. Finally, embed contingency planning that addresses tariff volatility and supply disruptions by diversifying processing locations, building bilateral supplier relationships, and maintaining alternative phytosanitary options so that trade exposure is minimized under shifting policy regimes.
Methodological approach combining technical literature, primary stakeholder interviews, site observations, and comparative technology profiling to ensure actionable insights
The research underpinning this executive summary combines a structured review of technical literature, regulatory documents, and operational case studies with primary stakeholder interviews across the value chain. Secondary sources were systematically analyzed to establish technology characteristics, safety evidence, and supply chain considerations, while primary interviews with equipment engineers, contract processors, quality assurance leads, and regulatory affairs specialists provided context on deployment constraints and commercial strategies. Site visits and process observations informed assessments of throughput, handling protocols, and integration requirements for differing product forms.
Analytical methods included comparative technology profiling to contrast electron beam, gamma, and x-ray capabilities, application mapping to align dose regimes with end-use cases, and scenario-based supply chain analysis to capture the effects of tariff changes and logistics realignment. Validation steps involved cross-checking technical claims with laboratory test reports and corroborating regulatory interpretations with government guidance documents. Throughout, the methodology emphasized triangulation across data types and stakeholders to ensure conclusions reflect operational realities and are actionable for decision-makers seeking to implement or scale irradiation-enabled processes.
Concluding perspective on how integrated technical, regulatory, and commercial approaches will determine successful irradiation adoption across food value chains
In summary, irradiation technologies are transitioning from niche applications to strategic tools that can bolster food safety, reduce spoilage, and support trade continuity when aligned with appropriate dose regimes, product handling, and regulatory strategies. Technological improvements in modality flexibility and facility integration are lowering barriers to entry, while tariff and trade dynamics emphasize the need for supply chain agility and diversified processing footprints. Segmentation analysis demonstrates that adoption is not monolithic: source technology, commodity type, intended application, dose selection, and product form jointly determine operational requirements and value realization.
Looking forward, organizations that pursue evidence-driven pilots, engage proactively with regulators, and adopt flexible commercial arrangements will be better positioned to capture the benefits of irradiation while managing perception and compliance risks. Collaborative approaches that bring together equipment providers, contract processors, logistics partners, and independent validation labs will accelerate credible deployment. Ultimately, irradiation offers a practical complement to existing food safety and preservation strategies when implemented with attention to technical fit, regulatory alignment, and transparent stakeholder communication.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
182 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Surge in adoption of electron beam irradiation for large-scale produce decontamination and shelf life extension
- 5.2. Implementation of strict regulatory harmonization across regions to streamline food irradiation approvals for exports
- 5.3. Investment in advanced irradiation facility technologies to boost energy efficiency and processing capacity
- 5.4. Growing consumer awareness campaigns highlighting safety and nutritional benefits of irradiated food products
- 5.5. Collaboration between food manufacturers and irradiation service providers to develop customized treatment protocols
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Food Irradiation Market, by Source
- 8.1. Electron Beam
- 8.2. Gamma
- 8.2.1. Cesium-137
- 8.2.2. Cobalt-60
- 8.3. X-Ray
- 9. Food Irradiation Market, by Food Type
- 9.1. Fruits & Vegetables
- 9.2. Meat & Poultry
- 9.3. Seafood
- 9.4. Spices & Seasonings
- 10. Food Irradiation Market, by Application
- 10.1. Disinfestation
- 10.2. Quarantine Treatment
- 10.3. Shelf-Life Extension
- 10.4. Sprout Inhibition
- 10.5. Sterilization
- 11. Food Irradiation Market, by Dose
- 11.1. High Dose
- 11.2. Low Dose
- 11.3. Medium Dose
- 12. Food Irradiation Market, by Form
- 12.1. Dried
- 12.2. Fresh
- 12.3. Frozen
- 12.4. Refrigerated
- 13. Food Irradiation Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Food Irradiation Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Food Irradiation Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Acsion Industries
- 16.3.2. Aragogamma S.L.
- 16.3.3. Bayer Corporation
- 16.3.4. Benebion LLC
- 16.3.5. Beta-Gamma-Service GmbH & Co. KG
- 16.3.6. Debio-Tec AG
- 16.3.7. Food Technology Service Inc.
- 16.3.8. Gammatom International B.V.
- 16.3.9. Gray Star Inc.
- 16.3.10. Heraeus Holding GmbH
- 16.3.11. IBA Industrial, Inc.
- 16.3.12. Ionisos SA
- 16.3.13. Mevex Corporation
- 16.3.14. Narveris General Trading LLC
- 16.3.15. Nordion Inc.
- 16.3.16. Nutek Corporation
- 16.3.17. Phytosan S.A.
- 16.3.18. Reviss Services Ltd.
- 16.3.19. Sadex Corporation
- 16.3.20. Scantech Sciences Inc.
- 16.3.21. Sterigenics International Inc.
- 16.3.22. Sterilization Solutions, Inc.
- 16.3.23. Sterix Isomedix Services
- 16.3.24. Tacleor LLC
- 16.3.25. Tascom Co. Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
