Fluid Handling Systems Market by Pump Type (Centrifugal, Positive Displacement), Drive Type (Diesel Engine, Electric Motor, Gas Engine), Material, Flow Rate, Pressure, Technology, Application, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Fluid Handling Systems Market was valued at USD 75.56 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 79.15 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 4.83%, reaching USD 110.23 billion by 2032.
Framing the modern fluid handling imperative with strategic context, operational priorities, cross-sector drivers and infrastructure imperatives reshaping pump ecosystems globally
The fluid handling landscape is experiencing convergent pressures that are accelerating change across engineering practices, procurement approaches, and operational standards. Aging infrastructure in many industrial and municipal systems is colliding with heightened expectations for energy efficiency, emissions control, and digitized asset management, forcing stakeholders to reassess priorities across capital projects and ongoing maintenance cycles. At the same time, advances in materials science, sensor technologies, and systems integration are creating opportunities to redesign pump selection, system topology, and lifecycle support in ways that materially reduce operating risk and total lifecycle expenditure.
Decision makers must now account for tighter regulatory environments and increasingly sophisticated buyer requirements while navigating supply chain volatility and sourcing constraints. This introduction situates the reader in that context, emphasizing how fluid handling is no longer a purely mechanical discipline but a cross‑functional domain where controls, data, and materials choices intersect with commercial strategy. It sets the tone for subsequent sections by highlighting the dual imperatives of operational reliability and strategic flexibility, preparing readers to evaluate segmentation, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, and concrete actions that will determine who benefits from the next wave of modernization.
Exploring transformative shifts in digitalization, materials innovation, sustainability mandates, and supply chain reconfiguration that are redefining competitive advantage in fluid handling
The pace and character of transformation in fluid handling systems are being defined by four interlocking vectors: digitalization, materials and design innovation, sustainability mandates, and supply chain realignment. Digitalization is extending intelligence to pumps through embedded sensors, edge analytics, and system‑level diagnostics that shift maintenance from calendar‑driven to condition‑based regimes. As a result, operational teams can prioritize interventions that prevent failure modes and optimize energy consumption, and engineering groups can design systems that are more adaptive to variable process demands.
Materials innovation and modular design are enabling a wider set of serviceable and resilient configurations, with composite and advanced stainless alloys improving corrosion resistance and reducing downtime in aggressive applications. Meanwhile, sustainability mandates and corporate net‑zero commitments are redirecting specification decisions toward energy‑efficient motor drives, variable speed controls, and integrated system solutions that lower lifecycle emissions. Finally, supply chain reconfiguration-driven by regional reshoring, tariff impacts, and supplier diversification strategies-is changing lead‑times and procurement risk profiles. Together these shifts are not incremental; they are redefining competitive advantage and creating a bifurcation between operators who adopt integrated, data‑driven models and those who retain legacy, component‑centric approaches.
Evaluating the cumulative operational, procurement and pricing implications stemming from United States tariff measures implemented in 2025 and their ripple effects across global fluid handling networks
The tariff measures introduced by the United States in 2025 introduced a new layer of complexity for buyers, suppliers, and project planners across the fluid handling ecosystem. The immediate effect has been an upward pressure on landed equipment costs for imports subject to higher duties, prompting buyers to reexamine supplier footprints and to accelerate qualification of alternative sources. In many cases, procurement teams have responded by expanding local sourcing, increasing reliance on regional distributors, or redesigning specifications to accommodate domestically manufactured components that avoid tariff exposure.
Beyond procurement, the tariffs have altered negotiation dynamics between OEMs, distributors, and end users. Suppliers with diversified manufacturing footprints have been able to offer continuity and predictable pricing, while smaller vendors reliant on single‑country production faced heightened margin compression and disruptions to delivery schedules. For asset operators, the tariffs have reinforced the importance of total lifecycle thinking: investing in more robust aftermarket agreements, extended warranties, and predictive maintenance capabilities can reduce the frequency of capital replacements that would otherwise be subject to import duties. Over the medium term, the tariff environment is likely to accelerate supplier consolidation in segments where scale enables cost mitigation through localized production, and to incentivize design standardization that simplifies cross‑border manufacturing and compliance.
Translating granular segmentation into strategic insight by aligning pump types, application sectors, drive mechanisms, materials, flow and pressure classes, technologies and channels to decisions
Understanding the market through a structured segmentation lens clarifies where technical requirements intersect with commercial opportunity and operational risk. Based on pump type, the market is studied across centrifugal and positive displacement machines, with the centrifugal family further delineated into horizontal centrifugal and vertical centrifugal units, while the positive displacement category is examined across diaphragm, gear, piston, and rotary lobe variants; those distinctions matter because each subgroup carries different installation footprints, maintenance patterns, and lifecycle cost drivers. Based on application, the market is studied across chemical processing, food and beverage, mining, oil and gas, pharmaceuticals, power generation, and water and wastewater, and each application demands unique materials, certification levels, and control strategies that influence procurement and aftermarket models.
Based on drive type, the market is studied across diesel engine, electric motor, gas engine, and steam turbine configurations, reflecting diverse site constraints and energy sourcing decisions that affect reliability and emissions profiles. Based on material, the market is studied across bronze, cast iron, plastic, and stainless steel options, which directly impact corrosion resistance, compatibility with aggressive media, and maintenance intervals. Based on flow rate, the market is studied across high flow, low flow, and medium flow categories, and based on pressure, the market is studied across high pressure, low pressure, and medium pressure classes; these hydraulic parameters drive selection of sealing systems, bearing designs, and control strategies. Based on technology, the market is studied across conventional pumps and smart pumps, with the smart pumps further studied across IoT enabled and sensor based architectures that enable condition monitoring and remote control. Finally, based on distribution channel, the market is studied across direct sales, distributors and dealers, and online channel, with the online channel further studied across e‑commerce platforms and OEM portals; channel choice affects lead times, configuration options, and service bundling. Integrating these segmentation pillars enables a nuanced approach to product development, sales prioritization, and aftermarket positioning that aligns technical capability with customer willingness to pay for reliability, data, and service.
Comparing regional demand drivers and performance dynamics across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific with an eye to infrastructure, industrial and regulatory differentials
Regional dynamics vary significantly and will determine where investment and supplier focus is most effective. In the Americas, infrastructure renewal cycles, advanced oil and gas projects, and widespread industrial modernizations are driving demand for integrated pump packages, aftermarket service agreements, and digital retrofit solutions. This region also features strong aftermarket service ecosystems and a growing preference for energy‑efficient replacements tied to corporate sustainability agendas.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the landscape is heterogeneous: Western Europe emphasizes regulatory compliance, energy optimization, and circularity in materials, while parts of the Middle East continue to prioritize robust, high‑capacity equipment for oil and gas and water desalination projects. Africa presents a mix of greenfield infrastructure needs and retrofit opportunities where rugged, low‑maintenance solutions have a competitive edge. In Asia‑Pacific, rapid industrialization, expanding municipal water and wastewater projects, and aggressive manufacturing growth create high volume demand for both conventional and smart pump solutions. The Asia‑Pacific region also hosts a dense supplier base with extensive manufacturing capacity, which shapes global sourcing strategies and competitive pricing dynamics. Recognizing these regional differentiators allows suppliers to tailor go‑to‑market approaches, aftersales networks, and localized product portfolios to match end‑user priorities and regulatory landscapes.
Profiling competitive positioning, innovation capabilities and aftermarket strength of leading pump manufacturers, systems integrators and service providers that influence consolidation and partnerships
Leading companies in the fluid handling sector are differentiating along three primary axes: product engineering and quality, digital and service offerings, and geographic manufacturing footprint. Firms that combine deep application expertise with modular product platforms are better positioned to win complex specifications because they can offer repeatable performance with configurable options that reduce engineering lead time. Similarly, organizations that have invested in sensor ecosystems, analytics platforms, and service delivery capabilities capture higher lifetime value through predictive maintenance contracts and performance guarantees.
Corporate strategies that emphasize diversified manufacturing reduce exposure to regional policy shocks and tariffs, while partnerships and strategic acquisitions accelerate access to aftermarket channels and specialized technologies. The aftermarket is a key battleground: companies that build robust spare‑parts distribution, field service teams, and retrofit capability secure recurring revenue and stronger customer relationships. Innovation in materials and sealing systems is another differentiator, particularly in corrosive or abrasive applications where uptime is mission critical. Overall, competitive positioning is increasingly determined by the ability to bundle hardware, software, and service into demonstrable reliability and efficiency outcomes rather than by component price alone.
Delivering actionable recommendations for industry leaders to enhance resilience, optimize lifecycle cost, accelerate digital adoption and expand aftermarket revenue streams in fluid handling
Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of actions that strengthen resilience, improve operational economics, and unlock new revenue pathways. First, prioritize lifecycle procurement frameworks that evaluate total ownership outcomes rather than initial equipment cost, combining stricter technical specification controls with flexible service agreements that can be adapted as operating conditions evolve. Second, accelerate digital adoption by deploying sensor arrays and analytics on high‑criticality assets to enable condition‑based maintenance, reduce unplanned downtime, and quantify energy savings for executive reporting.
Third, regionalize supply chains where tariffs, logistics costs, or lead‑time risk are material, and simultaneously qualify secondary suppliers to preserve operational continuity. Fourth, invest in aftermarket capabilities-spare parts availability, field service proficiency, and retrofit engineering-to convert installed base presence into recurring revenue. Fifth, align product portfolios with application‑specific needs by matching pump type, drive configuration, material selection, and control architecture to performance and environmental requirements. Finally, cultivate partnerships with controls and IoT specialists to offer integrated solutions that deliver measurable efficiency gains. Implementing these actions in combination will create higher barriers to entry and establish sustainable differentiation based on reliability and measurable value delivery.
Detailing a rigorous research methodology that blends primary interviews, technical validation, supply chain mapping and multi-source data synthesis to ensure robust actionable conclusions
The research underpinning this analysis employed a multi‑stage methodology designed to ensure technical fidelity and commercial relevance. Primary interviews were conducted with engineering leads, procurement directors, and aftermarket managers to capture real‑world constraints, specification trends, and pain points across key end‑use sectors. These qualitative inputs were supplemented with vendor technical documentation, reliability data, and publicly available regulatory frameworks to validate performance assumptions and materials compatibility considerations.
Supply chain mapping was performed to identify critical nodes, single‑source dependencies, and regional manufacturing capacities in order to understand lead‑time sensitivities and tariff exposures. Technical validation sessions with independent engineers and operations specialists were used to corroborate findings related to pump hydraulics, sealing systems, and control architectures. Throughout the process, data triangulation ensured that commercial implications drawn from interviews aligned with observed technical constraints and documented supplier capabilities, producing conclusions that are actionable for procurement, engineering, and executive stakeholders.
Synthesizing strategic conclusions that clarify near-term priorities for investors, OEMs, specifiers and operators to balance reliability, sustainability and capital efficiency in fluid handling
The analysis culminates in a clear recognition: fluid handling systems are at the intersection of engineering, digitalization, and commercial strategy, and organizations that treat pumps as systems rather than isolated components will gain the greatest advantage. Immediate priorities include strengthening aftermarket ecosystems, deploying condition monitoring on mission‑critical assets, and aligning procurement to lifecycle performance metrics. These actions reduce operational risk, lower energy consumption, and create measurable pathways to sustainability targets while enabling more predictable capital planning.
Strategically, suppliers and operators should prepare for continued policy and tariff volatility by diversifying manufacturing footprints and standardizing designs to facilitate cross‑border production. Investment in modular architectures and IoT‑enabled control platforms will differentiate offerings and support higher value service contracts. The conclusion is pragmatic: success will flow to those who combine technical excellence with integrated service models and clear commercial propositions that quantify reliability and efficiency gains for end users.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the modern fluid handling imperative with strategic context, operational priorities, cross-sector drivers and infrastructure imperatives reshaping pump ecosystems globally
The fluid handling landscape is experiencing convergent pressures that are accelerating change across engineering practices, procurement approaches, and operational standards. Aging infrastructure in many industrial and municipal systems is colliding with heightened expectations for energy efficiency, emissions control, and digitized asset management, forcing stakeholders to reassess priorities across capital projects and ongoing maintenance cycles. At the same time, advances in materials science, sensor technologies, and systems integration are creating opportunities to redesign pump selection, system topology, and lifecycle support in ways that materially reduce operating risk and total lifecycle expenditure.
Decision makers must now account for tighter regulatory environments and increasingly sophisticated buyer requirements while navigating supply chain volatility and sourcing constraints. This introduction situates the reader in that context, emphasizing how fluid handling is no longer a purely mechanical discipline but a cross‑functional domain where controls, data, and materials choices intersect with commercial strategy. It sets the tone for subsequent sections by highlighting the dual imperatives of operational reliability and strategic flexibility, preparing readers to evaluate segmentation, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, and concrete actions that will determine who benefits from the next wave of modernization.
Exploring transformative shifts in digitalization, materials innovation, sustainability mandates, and supply chain reconfiguration that are redefining competitive advantage in fluid handling
The pace and character of transformation in fluid handling systems are being defined by four interlocking vectors: digitalization, materials and design innovation, sustainability mandates, and supply chain realignment. Digitalization is extending intelligence to pumps through embedded sensors, edge analytics, and system‑level diagnostics that shift maintenance from calendar‑driven to condition‑based regimes. As a result, operational teams can prioritize interventions that prevent failure modes and optimize energy consumption, and engineering groups can design systems that are more adaptive to variable process demands.
Materials innovation and modular design are enabling a wider set of serviceable and resilient configurations, with composite and advanced stainless alloys improving corrosion resistance and reducing downtime in aggressive applications. Meanwhile, sustainability mandates and corporate net‑zero commitments are redirecting specification decisions toward energy‑efficient motor drives, variable speed controls, and integrated system solutions that lower lifecycle emissions. Finally, supply chain reconfiguration-driven by regional reshoring, tariff impacts, and supplier diversification strategies-is changing lead‑times and procurement risk profiles. Together these shifts are not incremental; they are redefining competitive advantage and creating a bifurcation between operators who adopt integrated, data‑driven models and those who retain legacy, component‑centric approaches.
Evaluating the cumulative operational, procurement and pricing implications stemming from United States tariff measures implemented in 2025 and their ripple effects across global fluid handling networks
The tariff measures introduced by the United States in 2025 introduced a new layer of complexity for buyers, suppliers, and project planners across the fluid handling ecosystem. The immediate effect has been an upward pressure on landed equipment costs for imports subject to higher duties, prompting buyers to reexamine supplier footprints and to accelerate qualification of alternative sources. In many cases, procurement teams have responded by expanding local sourcing, increasing reliance on regional distributors, or redesigning specifications to accommodate domestically manufactured components that avoid tariff exposure.
Beyond procurement, the tariffs have altered negotiation dynamics between OEMs, distributors, and end users. Suppliers with diversified manufacturing footprints have been able to offer continuity and predictable pricing, while smaller vendors reliant on single‑country production faced heightened margin compression and disruptions to delivery schedules. For asset operators, the tariffs have reinforced the importance of total lifecycle thinking: investing in more robust aftermarket agreements, extended warranties, and predictive maintenance capabilities can reduce the frequency of capital replacements that would otherwise be subject to import duties. Over the medium term, the tariff environment is likely to accelerate supplier consolidation in segments where scale enables cost mitigation through localized production, and to incentivize design standardization that simplifies cross‑border manufacturing and compliance.
Translating granular segmentation into strategic insight by aligning pump types, application sectors, drive mechanisms, materials, flow and pressure classes, technologies and channels to decisions
Understanding the market through a structured segmentation lens clarifies where technical requirements intersect with commercial opportunity and operational risk. Based on pump type, the market is studied across centrifugal and positive displacement machines, with the centrifugal family further delineated into horizontal centrifugal and vertical centrifugal units, while the positive displacement category is examined across diaphragm, gear, piston, and rotary lobe variants; those distinctions matter because each subgroup carries different installation footprints, maintenance patterns, and lifecycle cost drivers. Based on application, the market is studied across chemical processing, food and beverage, mining, oil and gas, pharmaceuticals, power generation, and water and wastewater, and each application demands unique materials, certification levels, and control strategies that influence procurement and aftermarket models.
Based on drive type, the market is studied across diesel engine, electric motor, gas engine, and steam turbine configurations, reflecting diverse site constraints and energy sourcing decisions that affect reliability and emissions profiles. Based on material, the market is studied across bronze, cast iron, plastic, and stainless steel options, which directly impact corrosion resistance, compatibility with aggressive media, and maintenance intervals. Based on flow rate, the market is studied across high flow, low flow, and medium flow categories, and based on pressure, the market is studied across high pressure, low pressure, and medium pressure classes; these hydraulic parameters drive selection of sealing systems, bearing designs, and control strategies. Based on technology, the market is studied across conventional pumps and smart pumps, with the smart pumps further studied across IoT enabled and sensor based architectures that enable condition monitoring and remote control. Finally, based on distribution channel, the market is studied across direct sales, distributors and dealers, and online channel, with the online channel further studied across e‑commerce platforms and OEM portals; channel choice affects lead times, configuration options, and service bundling. Integrating these segmentation pillars enables a nuanced approach to product development, sales prioritization, and aftermarket positioning that aligns technical capability with customer willingness to pay for reliability, data, and service.
Comparing regional demand drivers and performance dynamics across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific with an eye to infrastructure, industrial and regulatory differentials
Regional dynamics vary significantly and will determine where investment and supplier focus is most effective. In the Americas, infrastructure renewal cycles, advanced oil and gas projects, and widespread industrial modernizations are driving demand for integrated pump packages, aftermarket service agreements, and digital retrofit solutions. This region also features strong aftermarket service ecosystems and a growing preference for energy‑efficient replacements tied to corporate sustainability agendas.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the landscape is heterogeneous: Western Europe emphasizes regulatory compliance, energy optimization, and circularity in materials, while parts of the Middle East continue to prioritize robust, high‑capacity equipment for oil and gas and water desalination projects. Africa presents a mix of greenfield infrastructure needs and retrofit opportunities where rugged, low‑maintenance solutions have a competitive edge. In Asia‑Pacific, rapid industrialization, expanding municipal water and wastewater projects, and aggressive manufacturing growth create high volume demand for both conventional and smart pump solutions. The Asia‑Pacific region also hosts a dense supplier base with extensive manufacturing capacity, which shapes global sourcing strategies and competitive pricing dynamics. Recognizing these regional differentiators allows suppliers to tailor go‑to‑market approaches, aftersales networks, and localized product portfolios to match end‑user priorities and regulatory landscapes.
Profiling competitive positioning, innovation capabilities and aftermarket strength of leading pump manufacturers, systems integrators and service providers that influence consolidation and partnerships
Leading companies in the fluid handling sector are differentiating along three primary axes: product engineering and quality, digital and service offerings, and geographic manufacturing footprint. Firms that combine deep application expertise with modular product platforms are better positioned to win complex specifications because they can offer repeatable performance with configurable options that reduce engineering lead time. Similarly, organizations that have invested in sensor ecosystems, analytics platforms, and service delivery capabilities capture higher lifetime value through predictive maintenance contracts and performance guarantees.
Corporate strategies that emphasize diversified manufacturing reduce exposure to regional policy shocks and tariffs, while partnerships and strategic acquisitions accelerate access to aftermarket channels and specialized technologies. The aftermarket is a key battleground: companies that build robust spare‑parts distribution, field service teams, and retrofit capability secure recurring revenue and stronger customer relationships. Innovation in materials and sealing systems is another differentiator, particularly in corrosive or abrasive applications where uptime is mission critical. Overall, competitive positioning is increasingly determined by the ability to bundle hardware, software, and service into demonstrable reliability and efficiency outcomes rather than by component price alone.
Delivering actionable recommendations for industry leaders to enhance resilience, optimize lifecycle cost, accelerate digital adoption and expand aftermarket revenue streams in fluid handling
Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of actions that strengthen resilience, improve operational economics, and unlock new revenue pathways. First, prioritize lifecycle procurement frameworks that evaluate total ownership outcomes rather than initial equipment cost, combining stricter technical specification controls with flexible service agreements that can be adapted as operating conditions evolve. Second, accelerate digital adoption by deploying sensor arrays and analytics on high‑criticality assets to enable condition‑based maintenance, reduce unplanned downtime, and quantify energy savings for executive reporting.
Third, regionalize supply chains where tariffs, logistics costs, or lead‑time risk are material, and simultaneously qualify secondary suppliers to preserve operational continuity. Fourth, invest in aftermarket capabilities-spare parts availability, field service proficiency, and retrofit engineering-to convert installed base presence into recurring revenue. Fifth, align product portfolios with application‑specific needs by matching pump type, drive configuration, material selection, and control architecture to performance and environmental requirements. Finally, cultivate partnerships with controls and IoT specialists to offer integrated solutions that deliver measurable efficiency gains. Implementing these actions in combination will create higher barriers to entry and establish sustainable differentiation based on reliability and measurable value delivery.
Detailing a rigorous research methodology that blends primary interviews, technical validation, supply chain mapping and multi-source data synthesis to ensure robust actionable conclusions
The research underpinning this analysis employed a multi‑stage methodology designed to ensure technical fidelity and commercial relevance. Primary interviews were conducted with engineering leads, procurement directors, and aftermarket managers to capture real‑world constraints, specification trends, and pain points across key end‑use sectors. These qualitative inputs were supplemented with vendor technical documentation, reliability data, and publicly available regulatory frameworks to validate performance assumptions and materials compatibility considerations.
Supply chain mapping was performed to identify critical nodes, single‑source dependencies, and regional manufacturing capacities in order to understand lead‑time sensitivities and tariff exposures. Technical validation sessions with independent engineers and operations specialists were used to corroborate findings related to pump hydraulics, sealing systems, and control architectures. Throughout the process, data triangulation ensured that commercial implications drawn from interviews aligned with observed technical constraints and documented supplier capabilities, producing conclusions that are actionable for procurement, engineering, and executive stakeholders.
Synthesizing strategic conclusions that clarify near-term priorities for investors, OEMs, specifiers and operators to balance reliability, sustainability and capital efficiency in fluid handling
The analysis culminates in a clear recognition: fluid handling systems are at the intersection of engineering, digitalization, and commercial strategy, and organizations that treat pumps as systems rather than isolated components will gain the greatest advantage. Immediate priorities include strengthening aftermarket ecosystems, deploying condition monitoring on mission‑critical assets, and aligning procurement to lifecycle performance metrics. These actions reduce operational risk, lower energy consumption, and create measurable pathways to sustainability targets while enabling more predictable capital planning.
Strategically, suppliers and operators should prepare for continued policy and tariff volatility by diversifying manufacturing footprints and standardizing designs to facilitate cross‑border production. Investment in modular architectures and IoT‑enabled control platforms will differentiate offerings and support higher value service contracts. The conclusion is pragmatic: success will flow to those who combine technical excellence with integrated service models and clear commercial propositions that quantify reliability and efficiency gains for end users.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of IoT-enabled smart pumps with real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance features
- 5.2. Integration of AI-driven control algorithms for optimizing fluid flow in industrial processes
- 5.3. Deployment of magnetic drive pumps to enhance leak-free chemical handling safety
- 5.4. Development of energy-efficient variable frequency drive systems for centrifugal pumps
- 5.5. Increased use of corrosion-resistant materials like duplex stainless steel for aggressive fluids
- 5.6. Growing demand for modular skid-mounted pumping stations enabling rapid deployment in remote sites
- 5.7. Expansion of ultrasonic flow metering solutions for non-invasive measurement in sanitary pipelines
- 5.8. Implementation of digital twin technology to simulate pump networks under variable load conditions
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Pump Type
- 8.1. Centrifugal
- 8.1.1. Horizontal Centrifugal
- 8.1.2. Vertical Centrifugal
- 8.2. Positive Displacement
- 8.2.1. Diaphragm
- 8.2.2. Gear
- 8.2.3. Piston
- 8.2.4. Rotary Lobe
- 9. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Drive Type
- 9.1. Diesel Engine
- 9.2. Electric Motor
- 9.3. Gas Engine
- 9.4. Steam Turbine
- 10. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Material
- 10.1. Bronze
- 10.2. Cast Iron
- 10.3. Plastic
- 10.4. Stainless Steel
- 11. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Flow Rate
- 11.1. High Flow
- 11.2. Low Flow
- 11.3. Medium Flow
- 12. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Pressure
- 12.1. High Pressure
- 12.2. Low Pressure
- 12.3. Medium Pressure
- 13. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Technology
- 13.1. Conventional Pumps
- 13.2. Smart Pumps
- 13.2.1. IoT Enabled
- 13.2.2. Sensor Based
- 14. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Application
- 14.1. Chemical Processing
- 14.2. Food & Beverage
- 14.3. Mining
- 14.4. Oil & Gas
- 14.5. Pharmaceuticals
- 14.6. Power Generation
- 14.7. Water & Wastewater
- 15. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Distribution Channel
- 15.1. Direct Sales
- 15.2. Distributors And Dealers
- 15.3. Online Channel
- 15.3.1. E-Commerce Platforms
- 15.3.2. OEM Portals
- 16. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Region
- 16.1. Americas
- 16.1.1. North America
- 16.1.2. Latin America
- 16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 16.2.1. Europe
- 16.2.2. Middle East
- 16.2.3. Africa
- 16.3. Asia-Pacific
- 17. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Group
- 17.1. ASEAN
- 17.2. GCC
- 17.3. European Union
- 17.4. BRICS
- 17.5. G7
- 17.6. NATO
- 18. Fluid Handling Systems Market, by Country
- 18.1. United States
- 18.2. Canada
- 18.3. Mexico
- 18.4. Brazil
- 18.5. United Kingdom
- 18.6. Germany
- 18.7. France
- 18.8. Russia
- 18.9. Italy
- 18.10. Spain
- 18.11. China
- 18.12. India
- 18.13. Japan
- 18.14. Australia
- 18.15. South Korea
- 19. Competitive Landscape
- 19.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 19.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 19.3. Competitive Analysis
- 19.3.1. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
- 19.3.2. Endress+Hauser Group Services AG
- 19.3.3. Advanced Instruments, LLC
- 19.3.4. Aurora Biomed Inc.
- 19.3.5. Danaher Corporation
- 19.3.6. Blue-Ray Biotech Corp.
- 19.3.7. Corning Incorporated
- 19.3.8. Dispendix GmbH by BICO Group AB
- 19.3.9. Gilson Incorporated
- 19.3.10. Hamilton Company
- 19.3.11. Merck KGaA
- 19.3.12. PerkinElmer Inc.
- 19.3.13. Sartorius AG
- 19.3.14. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- 19.3.15. Automata Technologies Limited
- 19.3.16. Azenta Life Sciences
- 19.3.17. bioMérieux SA
- 19.3.18. BMG Labtech GmbH
- 19.3.19. Eppendorf SE
- 19.3.20. Hudson Robotics, Inc.
- 19.3.21. QIAGEN GmbH
- 19.3.22. Strateos, Inc.
- 19.3.23. Synchron Lab Automation
- 19.3.24. Tecan Trading AG
- 19.3.25. Waters Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
