Fiberglass Roving Market by Product Type (Ar Glass, C Glass, E Glass), Form (Chopped Strands, Continuous Filament), Technology, Application, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Fiberglass Roving Market was valued at USD 10.98 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 11.68 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.43%, reaching USD 18.09 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive industry context explaining the strategic role of fiberglass roving across advanced composites and industrial manufacturing applications
The fiberglass roving industry occupies a pivotal role at the intersection of advanced materials innovation and industrial-scale manufacturing. Fiberglass roving functions as a foundational reinforcement input across a wide range of composite applications, where its mechanical consistency, processing reliability, and surface chemistry determine final part performance. In recent years the material’s relevance has expanded beyond traditional construction and electrical insulation roles into high-value applications such as wind energy blades, transportation composites, and demanding industrial components that require precise fiber architecture and consistent sizing treatments.
As stakeholders reassess supply chains and materials strategies, the importance of quality control, treatment chemistry, and form factor - whether chopped strands, continuous filaments, or variations in end roving configuration - has become increasingly prominent. This introduction sets the scene for a focused analysis of where demand drivers are originating, how regulatory and trade developments are reshaping procurement decisions, and which technical and commercial attributes are becoming decisive in buyer selection. The subsequent sections explore transformative shifts, policy impacts, segmentation nuances, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, and recommended actions for leaders seeking to secure advantage in this evolving landscape.
How technological advances in treatment chemistries and manufacturing automation are reshaping demand, supply chains, and supplier selection criteria
The fiberglass roving ecosystem is undergoing a period of accelerated transformation driven by technological innovation, evolving end-use needs, and renewed focus on sustainability. Advances in surface treatments and sizing chemistries are enabling cleaner adhesion with thermoset and thermoplastic matrices, thereby broadening the material’s applicability to lighter, stronger composite structures. Concurrently, manufacturing innovations such as automation in roving handling and pultrusion enhancements are increasing throughput and consistency while reducing labor sensitivity and defect rates.
End-use sectors are also shifting demand patterns: the automotive and transportation sector is integrating more composite components to meet vehicle weight reduction targets, and wind energy continues to demand larger, longer blades that require high-quality, consistently supplied rovings. Regulatory pressures and evolving customer expectations are amplifying requirements around recyclability, lower-emission resins, and supplier transparency, which in turn push producers to adopt cleaner processes and more traceable supply chains. These converging factors are creating both challenges and opportunities for producers, processors, and buyers as they re-evaluate partnerships, invest in process upgrades, and prioritize technical service capabilities.
Assessment of how recent tariff interventions have cumulatively altered sourcing strategies, supplier footprints, and production-design choices across the fiberglass value chain
Policy measures implemented in recent tariff cycles have exerted a compound effect on supply chain planning, procurement strategies, and end-user pricing dynamics across the fiberglass roving value chain. Tariff-driven uncertainty has increased the cost of certain imports and incentivized buyers to diversify sourcing, nearshore production, and vertical integration. As a result, procurement teams now weigh not only traditional criteria such as price, lead time, and quality but also tariff exposure, trade-compliance risk, and the resilience of alternative suppliers.
The cumulative consequences of these trade actions have been most visible in longer lead times for specialized grades and in accelerated conversations about reshoring or regional production hubs. Suppliers with flexible manufacturing footprints, robust customs and compliance capabilities, and established local inventories have a competitive advantage. At the same time, some downstream manufacturers have responded by reformulating component designs to accommodate locally available fiber grades or to reduce sensitivity to material cost volatility. Policymakers’ emphasis on domestic capacity building has also prompted strategic investments in production assets, training, and supplier development programs intended to mitigate future trade shocks and to stabilize critical supply lines for high-priority industries.
Detailed segmentation insights explaining how application, product type, form factors, end-use verticals, and surface-treatment technologies drive buyer selection and supplier differentiation
Segment-level dynamics reveal differentiated drivers and adoption curves that are critical for strategic decision-making. Based on Application, demand is split among Automotive & Transportation, Composites, Construction Materials, Electrical & Electronics, and Wind Energy, with composites applications further delineated into FRP plates and sheets, molded components, and pultruded profiles, each segment valuing distinct roving characteristics such as strand count, sizing chemistry, and tow consistency. Based on Product Type, technical selection rests among Ar glass, C glass, E glass, and S glass, where mechanical properties and cost-performance trade-offs dictate suitability for specific structural or insulation roles. Based on End Use Industry, adoption patterns vary across Aerospace & Defense, Automotive & Transportation, Construction, Electrical & Electronics, and Wind Energy, where certification regimes, durability expectations, and life-cycle considerations shape supplier qualifications and testing requirements.
Based on Form, the choice between chopped strands and continuous filament affects processing lines and resin compatibility, and continuous filament alternatives are further differentiated into multiple end roving, single end roving, and tow configurations that influence winding, pultrusion, and molding performance. Based on Technology, the prevalent treatment approaches-epoxy treatment and silane treatment-drive interfacial performance with resin systems and determine long-term durability in harsh environments. Understanding these segmentation lenses together clarifies where technical investments, quality control, and customer service add the most value and where product portfolios should be optimized to match specific processing and performance requirements.
How divergent regional regulatory regimes, industrial clusters, and logistical realities are reshaping procurement and production strategies across global fiberglass roving markets
Regional dynamics shape supply chain strategy and commercialization priorities in materially different ways across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, proximity to major transportation and wind energy OEMs, combined with an emphasis on domestic capacity and regulatory scrutiny, has encouraged investments in local manufacturing and inventory buffers to secure just-in-time supply and to support rapid technical collaboration. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, complex regulatory frameworks, stringent environmental requirements, and historically strong composites ecosystems have favored suppliers that can demonstrate high-quality controls, sustainability credentials, and deep engineering support for renewable energy and construction projects.
Asia-Pacific remains a major production and consumption hub with a broad supplier base, vertically integrated supply chains, and rapid adoption of new production techniques; buyers there often prioritize cost competitiveness, scale, and speed of delivery while simultaneously raising expectations for performance consistency. Across all regions, the interplay between regional policy measures, local OEM clustering, and logistical realities influences decisions about where to locate inventories, how to structure contracts, and which technical partnerships to pursue in order to minimize disruption and capture growth opportunities.
Key competitive dynamics showing how technical service, manufacturing flexibility, and strategic partnerships are creating differentiated value propositions among fiberglass roving suppliers
Competitive positioning in the fiberglass roving sector is increasingly defined by a combination of technical capability, operational flexibility, and service-led differentiation. Leading manufacturers are investing in advanced surface treatment laboratories and process analytics to ensure consistent sizing adhesion across resin platforms, while others focus on expanding form-factor options such as specialized tows and multi-end rovings to support complex winding and pultrusion processes. Companies that provide integrated solutions-combining tailored roving specifications, just-in-time delivery, and on-site technical assistance-are frequently preferred by OEMs that require tight tolerances and rapid troubleshooting support.
Strategic partnerships and joint development agreements between fiber suppliers and resin formulators or composite processors are becoming more common, enabling faster qualification cycles for new applications. Firms that maintain transparent traceability systems and can demonstrate lower embodied-energy footprints are also gaining favor among buyers with sustainability mandates. At the same time, smaller specialty producers differentiate through niche capabilities such as high-strength S glass grades or custom sizing chemistries, which serve aerospace, defense, and high-performance transportation programs where certification and reliability are paramount.
Actionable and prioritized strategic recommendations for suppliers and OEMs to strengthen supply resilience, technical differentiation, and sustainability credentials
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic, multi-pronged approach to secure resilience and capture differentiated value. First, prioritize investments in treatment chemistry capabilities and quality analytics to reduce variability and accelerate customer qualification for higher-value applications. Second, diversify sourcing by combining regional production hubs with strategic inventory nodes to mitigate tariff exposure and logistics disruptions while preserving responsiveness to OEM schedules. Third, deepen technical partnerships with resin formulators and composite processors to co-develop application-specific rovings and reduce qualification lead times.
Moreover, companies should formalize sustainability roadmaps that include traceability, energy-efficiency initiatives, and end-of-life strategies for composite products, thereby aligning with evolving customer procurement criteria. Enhance commercial agility by offering tailored commercial terms, technical training, and on-site support that lower buyers’ switching costs. Finally, consider targeted capability investments in automation for roving handling and pultrusion processes to reduce labor risk and improve consistency, enabling suppliers to command premium pricing where performance and reliability are prioritized.
Transparent and reproducible research methodology combining primary interviews, plant validations, technical literature, and comparative analytics to support evidence-based insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines qualitative and quantitative evidence streams to ensure robust, reproducible insights. Primary inputs include structured interviews with manufacturing leaders, procurement professionals, and technical experts across fiber manufacturing, composite processing, and end-use OEMs, supplemented by plant-level site visits to validate manufacturing practices and quality control regimes. Secondary sources involve technical literature, industry standards documentation, regulatory notices, and trade publications to contextualize treatment chemistries, form-factor developments, and policy trends.
Analytical techniques include cross-segmentation comparative analysis to identify where product attributes map to application requirements, supply chain stress testing to evaluate resilience under tariff and logistics scenarios, and competitive benchmarking to determine capability gaps. Triangulation across data sources and stakeholder perspectives ensures that conclusions are grounded in observable practices and validated expert judgment, with an emphasis on reproducibility and transparency in assumptions and evidence sources.
Conclusive synthesis describing why technical excellence, supply-chain agility, and sustainability alignment will determine competitive winners in fiberglass roving markets
The fiberglass roving sector stands at a critical inflection point where technical progress, policy shifts, and changing end-use demands converge to reframe competitive advantage. Suppliers that invest in treatment chemistry innovation, quality analytics, and flexible production forms will be better positioned to serve high-growth and high-specification applications. Buyers who reprioritize sourcing strategies to balance tariff exposure, regional proximity, and supplier technical support will gain operational stability and reduce qualification risks.
In sum, the future landscape favors integrated approaches that combine technical excellence, supply chain agility, and demonstrable sustainability commitments. Organizations that act now to align product development, commercial structures, and regional footprints with these imperatives will achieve measurable improvements in reliability and market responsiveness, enabling them to capture opportunities as the composite materials ecosystem continues to evolve.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive industry context explaining the strategic role of fiberglass roving across advanced composites and industrial manufacturing applications
The fiberglass roving industry occupies a pivotal role at the intersection of advanced materials innovation and industrial-scale manufacturing. Fiberglass roving functions as a foundational reinforcement input across a wide range of composite applications, where its mechanical consistency, processing reliability, and surface chemistry determine final part performance. In recent years the material’s relevance has expanded beyond traditional construction and electrical insulation roles into high-value applications such as wind energy blades, transportation composites, and demanding industrial components that require precise fiber architecture and consistent sizing treatments.
As stakeholders reassess supply chains and materials strategies, the importance of quality control, treatment chemistry, and form factor - whether chopped strands, continuous filaments, or variations in end roving configuration - has become increasingly prominent. This introduction sets the scene for a focused analysis of where demand drivers are originating, how regulatory and trade developments are reshaping procurement decisions, and which technical and commercial attributes are becoming decisive in buyer selection. The subsequent sections explore transformative shifts, policy impacts, segmentation nuances, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, and recommended actions for leaders seeking to secure advantage in this evolving landscape.
How technological advances in treatment chemistries and manufacturing automation are reshaping demand, supply chains, and supplier selection criteria
The fiberglass roving ecosystem is undergoing a period of accelerated transformation driven by technological innovation, evolving end-use needs, and renewed focus on sustainability. Advances in surface treatments and sizing chemistries are enabling cleaner adhesion with thermoset and thermoplastic matrices, thereby broadening the material’s applicability to lighter, stronger composite structures. Concurrently, manufacturing innovations such as automation in roving handling and pultrusion enhancements are increasing throughput and consistency while reducing labor sensitivity and defect rates.
End-use sectors are also shifting demand patterns: the automotive and transportation sector is integrating more composite components to meet vehicle weight reduction targets, and wind energy continues to demand larger, longer blades that require high-quality, consistently supplied rovings. Regulatory pressures and evolving customer expectations are amplifying requirements around recyclability, lower-emission resins, and supplier transparency, which in turn push producers to adopt cleaner processes and more traceable supply chains. These converging factors are creating both challenges and opportunities for producers, processors, and buyers as they re-evaluate partnerships, invest in process upgrades, and prioritize technical service capabilities.
Assessment of how recent tariff interventions have cumulatively altered sourcing strategies, supplier footprints, and production-design choices across the fiberglass value chain
Policy measures implemented in recent tariff cycles have exerted a compound effect on supply chain planning, procurement strategies, and end-user pricing dynamics across the fiberglass roving value chain. Tariff-driven uncertainty has increased the cost of certain imports and incentivized buyers to diversify sourcing, nearshore production, and vertical integration. As a result, procurement teams now weigh not only traditional criteria such as price, lead time, and quality but also tariff exposure, trade-compliance risk, and the resilience of alternative suppliers.
The cumulative consequences of these trade actions have been most visible in longer lead times for specialized grades and in accelerated conversations about reshoring or regional production hubs. Suppliers with flexible manufacturing footprints, robust customs and compliance capabilities, and established local inventories have a competitive advantage. At the same time, some downstream manufacturers have responded by reformulating component designs to accommodate locally available fiber grades or to reduce sensitivity to material cost volatility. Policymakers’ emphasis on domestic capacity building has also prompted strategic investments in production assets, training, and supplier development programs intended to mitigate future trade shocks and to stabilize critical supply lines for high-priority industries.
Detailed segmentation insights explaining how application, product type, form factors, end-use verticals, and surface-treatment technologies drive buyer selection and supplier differentiation
Segment-level dynamics reveal differentiated drivers and adoption curves that are critical for strategic decision-making. Based on Application, demand is split among Automotive & Transportation, Composites, Construction Materials, Electrical & Electronics, and Wind Energy, with composites applications further delineated into FRP plates and sheets, molded components, and pultruded profiles, each segment valuing distinct roving characteristics such as strand count, sizing chemistry, and tow consistency. Based on Product Type, technical selection rests among Ar glass, C glass, E glass, and S glass, where mechanical properties and cost-performance trade-offs dictate suitability for specific structural or insulation roles. Based on End Use Industry, adoption patterns vary across Aerospace & Defense, Automotive & Transportation, Construction, Electrical & Electronics, and Wind Energy, where certification regimes, durability expectations, and life-cycle considerations shape supplier qualifications and testing requirements.
Based on Form, the choice between chopped strands and continuous filament affects processing lines and resin compatibility, and continuous filament alternatives are further differentiated into multiple end roving, single end roving, and tow configurations that influence winding, pultrusion, and molding performance. Based on Technology, the prevalent treatment approaches-epoxy treatment and silane treatment-drive interfacial performance with resin systems and determine long-term durability in harsh environments. Understanding these segmentation lenses together clarifies where technical investments, quality control, and customer service add the most value and where product portfolios should be optimized to match specific processing and performance requirements.
How divergent regional regulatory regimes, industrial clusters, and logistical realities are reshaping procurement and production strategies across global fiberglass roving markets
Regional dynamics shape supply chain strategy and commercialization priorities in materially different ways across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, proximity to major transportation and wind energy OEMs, combined with an emphasis on domestic capacity and regulatory scrutiny, has encouraged investments in local manufacturing and inventory buffers to secure just-in-time supply and to support rapid technical collaboration. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, complex regulatory frameworks, stringent environmental requirements, and historically strong composites ecosystems have favored suppliers that can demonstrate high-quality controls, sustainability credentials, and deep engineering support for renewable energy and construction projects.
Asia-Pacific remains a major production and consumption hub with a broad supplier base, vertically integrated supply chains, and rapid adoption of new production techniques; buyers there often prioritize cost competitiveness, scale, and speed of delivery while simultaneously raising expectations for performance consistency. Across all regions, the interplay between regional policy measures, local OEM clustering, and logistical realities influences decisions about where to locate inventories, how to structure contracts, and which technical partnerships to pursue in order to minimize disruption and capture growth opportunities.
Key competitive dynamics showing how technical service, manufacturing flexibility, and strategic partnerships are creating differentiated value propositions among fiberglass roving suppliers
Competitive positioning in the fiberglass roving sector is increasingly defined by a combination of technical capability, operational flexibility, and service-led differentiation. Leading manufacturers are investing in advanced surface treatment laboratories and process analytics to ensure consistent sizing adhesion across resin platforms, while others focus on expanding form-factor options such as specialized tows and multi-end rovings to support complex winding and pultrusion processes. Companies that provide integrated solutions-combining tailored roving specifications, just-in-time delivery, and on-site technical assistance-are frequently preferred by OEMs that require tight tolerances and rapid troubleshooting support.
Strategic partnerships and joint development agreements between fiber suppliers and resin formulators or composite processors are becoming more common, enabling faster qualification cycles for new applications. Firms that maintain transparent traceability systems and can demonstrate lower embodied-energy footprints are also gaining favor among buyers with sustainability mandates. At the same time, smaller specialty producers differentiate through niche capabilities such as high-strength S glass grades or custom sizing chemistries, which serve aerospace, defense, and high-performance transportation programs where certification and reliability are paramount.
Actionable and prioritized strategic recommendations for suppliers and OEMs to strengthen supply resilience, technical differentiation, and sustainability credentials
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic, multi-pronged approach to secure resilience and capture differentiated value. First, prioritize investments in treatment chemistry capabilities and quality analytics to reduce variability and accelerate customer qualification for higher-value applications. Second, diversify sourcing by combining regional production hubs with strategic inventory nodes to mitigate tariff exposure and logistics disruptions while preserving responsiveness to OEM schedules. Third, deepen technical partnerships with resin formulators and composite processors to co-develop application-specific rovings and reduce qualification lead times.
Moreover, companies should formalize sustainability roadmaps that include traceability, energy-efficiency initiatives, and end-of-life strategies for composite products, thereby aligning with evolving customer procurement criteria. Enhance commercial agility by offering tailored commercial terms, technical training, and on-site support that lower buyers’ switching costs. Finally, consider targeted capability investments in automation for roving handling and pultrusion processes to reduce labor risk and improve consistency, enabling suppliers to command premium pricing where performance and reliability are prioritized.
Transparent and reproducible research methodology combining primary interviews, plant validations, technical literature, and comparative analytics to support evidence-based insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines qualitative and quantitative evidence streams to ensure robust, reproducible insights. Primary inputs include structured interviews with manufacturing leaders, procurement professionals, and technical experts across fiber manufacturing, composite processing, and end-use OEMs, supplemented by plant-level site visits to validate manufacturing practices and quality control regimes. Secondary sources involve technical literature, industry standards documentation, regulatory notices, and trade publications to contextualize treatment chemistries, form-factor developments, and policy trends.
Analytical techniques include cross-segmentation comparative analysis to identify where product attributes map to application requirements, supply chain stress testing to evaluate resilience under tariff and logistics scenarios, and competitive benchmarking to determine capability gaps. Triangulation across data sources and stakeholder perspectives ensures that conclusions are grounded in observable practices and validated expert judgment, with an emphasis on reproducibility and transparency in assumptions and evidence sources.
Conclusive synthesis describing why technical excellence, supply-chain agility, and sustainability alignment will determine competitive winners in fiberglass roving markets
The fiberglass roving sector stands at a critical inflection point where technical progress, policy shifts, and changing end-use demands converge to reframe competitive advantage. Suppliers that invest in treatment chemistry innovation, quality analytics, and flexible production forms will be better positioned to serve high-growth and high-specification applications. Buyers who reprioritize sourcing strategies to balance tariff exposure, regional proximity, and supplier technical support will gain operational stability and reduce qualification risks.
In sum, the future landscape favors integrated approaches that combine technical excellence, supply chain agility, and demonstrable sustainability commitments. Organizations that act now to align product development, commercial structures, and regional footprints with these imperatives will achieve measurable improvements in reliability and market responsiveness, enabling them to capture opportunities as the composite materials ecosystem continues to evolve.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
199 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing adoption of E-glass roving in wind turbine blade manufacturing for enhanced strength and durability under extreme conditions
- 5.2. Integration of bio-based resins with fiberglass roving to meet rising sustainability and carbon footprint reduction targets
- 5.3. Development of hybrid composite materials combining fiberglass roving and carbon fibers for lightweight automotive structural components
- 5.4. Expansion of demand for high-performance fiberglass roving in construction applications focused on fire resistance and thermal insulation standards
- 5.5. Advances in automated filament winding processes optimizing fiberglass roving placement in pressure vessel production for energy storage
- 5.6. Implementation of closed-loop recycling systems for end-of-life fiberglass roving composites to support circular economy initiatives
- 5.7. Emergence of specialty sizing agents enhancing interfacial bonding between fiberglass roving and thermoplastic matrices in composite manufacturing
- 5.8. Increasing utilization of chopped fiberglass roving mats in marine vessel hull production to improve impact resistance and corrosion protection
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Fiberglass Roving Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Ar Glass
- 8.2. C Glass
- 8.3. E Glass
- 8.4. S Glass
- 9. Fiberglass Roving Market, by Form
- 9.1. Chopped Strands
- 9.2. Continuous Filament
- 9.2.1. Multiple End Roving
- 9.2.2. Single End Roving
- 9.2.3. Tow
- 10. Fiberglass Roving Market, by Technology
- 10.1. Epoxy Treatment
- 10.2. Silane Treatment
- 11. Fiberglass Roving Market, by Application
- 11.1. Automotive & Transportation
- 11.2. Composites
- 11.2.1. Frp Plates & Sheets
- 11.2.2. Molded Components
- 11.2.3. Pultruded Profiles
- 11.3. Construction Materials
- 11.4. Electrical & Electronics
- 11.5. Wind Energy
- 12. Fiberglass Roving Market, by End Use Industry
- 12.1. Aerospace & Defense
- 12.2. Automotive & Transportation
- 12.3. Construction
- 12.4. Electrical & Electronics
- 12.5. Wind Energy
- 13. Fiberglass Roving Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Fiberglass Roving Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Fiberglass Roving Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. AGY Holding Corporation
- 16.3.2. BGF Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.3. Binani 3B-The Fibreglass Company
- 16.3.4. Celanese Corporation
- 16.3.5. China Beihai Fiberglass Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.6. China Jushi Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.7. China National Building Material Company Limited
- 16.3.8. Chomarat Group
- 16.3.9. Chongqing Polycomp International Corporation
- 16.3.10. Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A.
- 16.3.11. CTG Group
- 16.3.12. Fibtex Products
- 16.3.13. Jiuding New Material Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.14. Johns Manville Corporation by Berkshire Hathaway Company
- 16.3.15. Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.16. Nische Solutions
- 16.3.17. Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.18. Owens Corning
- 16.3.19. P-D Glasseiden GmbH
- 16.3.20. PFG Fiberglass Corporation
- 16.3.21. PPG Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.22. Reliance Industries Limited
- 16.3.23. S. G. F. Enterprises
- 16.3.24. Saertex GmbH
- 16.3.25. Taiwan Glass Industry Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
