Fiber-reinforced Plastic Recycling Market by End Use Industry (Automotive & Transportation, Construction & Infrastructure, Marine & Aerospace), Product Type (Composites, Profiles, Sheets & Plates), Fiber Type, Recycling Process - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Fiber-reinforced Plastic Recycling Market was valued at USD 541.34 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 588.28 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.73%, reaching USD 1,057.81 million by 2032.
An integrative introduction that frames material complexity, innovation trajectories, and stakeholder incentives driving the evolution of fiber‑reinforced plastic recycling
The landscape of fiber‑reinforced plastic recycling sits at the intersection of urgent environmental objectives, accelerating material innovation, and shifting commercial incentives. The composite materials that deliver high strength‑to‑weight ratios across transportation, infrastructure, and energy sectors now present a circularity challenge: their durable, multi‑matrix construction complicates separation, recovery, and re‑integration into new products. As a result, stakeholders from original equipment manufacturers to material suppliers and public agencies are prioritizing strategies that convert end‑of‑life composites into feedstocks, performance components, or benign waste streams.
Concurrently, advances in chemical technologies, thermal recovery processes, and mechanical reprocessing have begun to reframe what recycling can accomplish for complex composites. Technology maturation is enabling novel end markets for recycled fibers and resins, while product design and procurement policies are emerging as levers to increase recyclability across the value chain. Taken together, these dynamics create an inflection point: organizations that adopt systems thinking and invest in scalable recovery routes stand to reduce lifecycle impacts, secure material supply resilience, and meet growing requirements from customers and regulators.
A detailed account of the regulatory, technological, and commercial paradigm shifts reshaping recovery and circularity practices for composite materials
Recent years have seen multiple transformative shifts that are reconfiguring the fiber‑reinforced plastic recycling landscape. First, regulatory and procurement pressures have moved beyond voluntary sustainability statements; they now mandate demonstrable end‑of‑life solutions and recycled content credentials, thereby forcing design and sourcing decisions upstream. Second, technological progress in areas such as pyrolysis, solvolysis, and advanced mechanical separation is expanding the repertoire of viable recovery pathways. These innovations are reducing the performance delta between virgin and recycled fibers, while also improving energy efficiency and process consistency.
Third, business model innovation is emerging as a critical force: extended producer responsibility schemes, take‑back services, and circular supply agreements increasingly align incentives across OEMs, recyclers, and material processors. Fourth, industry collaboration across material suppliers, recyclers, and end users is accelerating the emergence of standardized testing and certification protocols, which in turn reduce transaction friction for recycled content. Finally, capital allocation patterns indicate a growing willingness to fund demonstration facilities and scale‑up pilots, shifting the conversation from proof‑of‑concept to industrial deployment. Collectively, these shifts are establishing a new normal in which recyclability and circular procurement are integral to product and corporate strategy rather than peripheral sustainability initiatives.
An analysis of how 2025 tariff measures are recalibrating supply chain resilience, procurement incentives, and investment priorities in composite recycling
The introduction of new tariff measures affecting composite imports and downstream materials in 2025 has altered supply chain calculus and commercial incentives in important ways. Increased import costs have prompted original equipment manufacturers and processors to reevaluate sourcing strategies, accelerating interest in domestic recycling routes and localized supply networks. When import economics tighten, the relative attractiveness of recovered fibers and recycled resins improves, prompting procurement teams to pilot recycled inputs where technical parity can be demonstrated.
Moreover, tariff‑driven cost pressure has highlighted vulnerabilities in long, globalized value chains and made investment in resilient, regionalized processing assets more compelling. As a consequence, some manufacturers are rediscovering the strategic value of feedstock diversification and vertical integration. At the same time, tariffs have the potential to slow the adoption of higher‑value virgin composites in cost‑sensitive markets, thereby creating an opening for recycled material suppliers to capture displacement opportunities. In sum, these trade measures are not merely a near‑term cost shock; they are reshaping long‑term incentives around supply chain architecture, capital allocation for recycling infrastructure, and collaborative procurement models that prioritize domestic circularity.
Key segmentation insights revealing how end use sectors, product typologies, fiber chemistry, and process selection determine recycling feasibility and commercial pathways
Understanding where recycling yields the greatest technical and commercial gains requires segmentation by end use, product architecture, fiber chemistry, and process pathway. Across end use industries, Automotive And Transportation demand high performance recycled fibers and predictable mechanical properties to meet safety and durability standards, while Construction And Infrastructure prioritize cost‑effective bulk materials with long service lives and fire performance characteristics. Marine And Aerospace applications emphasize corrosion resistance, structural integrity, and regulatory certification, and Wind Energy presents a large volume, high‑volume laminate waste stream where blade recycling and material recovery are rapidly emerging as strategic priorities.
Product type matters because reprocessing requirements differ substantially between complex molded composites and simpler profiles, sheets, and plates. Composites often require targeted recovery approaches that account for embedded resins and fiber orientations, with thermoplastic composites being comparatively easier to reprocess than thermoset composites due to their inherent re‑melting and reshaping potential. Profiles and sheets & plates, by contrast, offer opportunities for mechanical re‑use or downcycling where dimensional stability is preserved. Fiber type further refines recovery strategies: Aramid Fiber presents chemical sensitivity that impacts depolymerization choices, Carbon Fiber demands careful handling to retain tensile properties, and Glass Fiber offers a balance of cost and recyclability with established mechanical recovery routes. Finally, the recycling process selection-whether chemical, mechanical, or thermal-drives the quality and applicability of recovered material. Chemical routes such as depolymerization and solvolysis are attractive when high‑purity feedstocks are needed, thermal options like pyrolysis can recover carbonaceous fibers and energy, and mechanical processing often provides pragmatic, lower‑capex pathways for volume‑oriented streams. Integrating these segmentation lenses helps stakeholders prioritize R&D, capital deployment, and strategic partnerships according to the specific performance and cost thresholds of each application.
Regionally specific insights into how policy frameworks, industrial capacity, and procurement practices are shaping recycling pathways across the Americas, Europe Middle East and Africa, and Asia Pacific
Regional dynamics are a decisive factor in shaping recycling strategies for fiber‑reinforced plastics, with distinct drivers and constraints emerging across the globe. In the Americas, policy emphasis on domestic manufacturing competitiveness and circular procurement is prompting investment in localized recycling capacity and collection infrastructure. North American OEMs are increasingly evaluating circular supply agreements and technology partnerships to secure recycled feedstocks that reduce exposure to volatile global logistics and trade measures.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks and extended producer responsibility schemes are pushing manufacturers and waste managers toward higher diversion rates and certified recovery processes, which in turn foster innovation in chemical recycling and certification protocols. European jurisdictions are also investing in standardization and end‑of‑life documentation systems that simplify cross‑border trade in recycled materials. In Asia‑Pacific, rapid manufacturing scale, diverse material flows, and strong original equipment production create both large recovery opportunities and logistical complexity. Policymakers and industry actors in the region are balancing the growth imperative with nascent circularity initiatives, while areas with heavy wind turbine and automotive manufacturing are becoming focal points for pilot recycling facilities. These regional contrasts underline the importance of aligning technology selection, partnership models, and policy engagement to local regulatory environments and industrial strengths.
An assessment of the competitive dynamics and partnership models that determine which players will scale recycling technologies and capture value across the composite materials value chain
Competitive dynamics in the recycling ecosystem are evolving as technology providers, material suppliers, and original equipment manufacturers converge on end‑of‑life solutions. Tiered specialization is emerging: pure‑play recyclers focus on scale and logistics, process innovators develop high‑value chemical and thermal recovery routes, and established material suppliers integrate recycled inputs to protect market position. Partnerships that combine feedstock aggregation, process engineering, and application know‑how are proving critical to close the loop at commercially relevant scales.
Additionally, licensing arrangements for proprietary recovery technologies are enabling faster market entry for recyclers while jointly funded demonstration projects de‑risk leading‑edge approaches. Corporations with product stewardship obligations are increasingly deploying procurement levers and supplier engagement programs to stimulate demand for recycled materials. Equity investors and corporate venture arms have begun to allocate capital toward companies that can demonstrate credible pathways from pilot to plant, which in turn drives consolidation and strategic alliances. Overall, the competitive landscape rewards organizations that align technical capability with off‑take agreements and that can navigate certification requirements to deliver traceable, quality‑assured recycled materials to demanding end markets.
Actionable, prioritized recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate commercial recycling adoption while managing technical and regulatory risk
Leaders who intend to shape the future of composite recycling should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions that accelerate adoption while managing risk. First, invest in selective pilot projects that validate performance claims under real operational conditions and that include third‑party testing to support certification. Second, design procurement policies that create credible demand signals for recycled inputs and that include staged volume commitments tied to quality criteria. Third, form targeted partnerships that combine feedstock aggregation, processing expertise, and product development capacity to bridge the interoperability gaps between suppliers and end users.
Fourth, embed circularity in product design by simplifying material constructions, favoring thermoplastics where appropriate, and standardizing interfaces to ease disassembly and sorting. Fifth, engage proactively with regulators and standards bodies to co‑design practical compliance pathways and testing protocols that recognize the specificities of fiber‑reinforced composites. Finally, align capital deployment with staged milestones and learnings from pilot facilities to avoid premature scale‑ups while maintaining momentum. These actions reduce technical and commercial uncertainty and position organizations to convert regulatory and market pressure into sustained competitive advantage.
A rigorous mixed‑methods research framework combining primary interviews, laboratory validation, process audits, and triangulated secondary evidence to ensure robust findings
This study employs a mixed‑methods research approach that integrates primary interviews, laboratory validation, process audits, and exhaustive secondary documentation. Primary research included structured discussions with technical leads at manufacturers, recycling operators, and materials scientists to capture operational constraints and technology readiness. Laboratory validation and pilot plant data were used to corroborate performance claims for chemical depolymerization, pyrolysis, and mechanical reprocessing, with particular attention to fiber retention, contaminant profiles, and energy intensity.
Secondary research drew on peer‑reviewed literature, standards documents, patent landscapes, and trade publications to establish baseline technical parameters and to map historical technology trajectories. Data triangulation techniques were applied to reconcile discrepancies among sources, and scenario analysis was used to test the sensitivity of strategic options to key variables such as feedstock quality and regulatory change. Quality assurance protocols included expert peer review, methodologically transparent assumptions, and versioned datasets to support reproducibility. The result is a rigorous evidence base that links laboratory findings to commercial deployment considerations and policy implications.
A conclusive synthesis emphasizing the interconnected steps needed across technology, procurement, and policy to scale composite recycling into durable industrial practice
The path to scalable recycling of fiber‑reinforced plastics is neither singular nor simple; it requires coordinated progress across technology, design, policy, and commercial collaboration. Progress to date demonstrates that a portfolio of recovery routes-mechanical, thermal, and chemical-can be deployed in complementary roles depending on feedstock composition and end use requirements. Importantly, aligning procurement practices and standards with demonstrable material performance reduces market friction and enables circular supply chains to emerge with economic credibility.
Looking ahead, stakeholders that integrate product redesign, localized feedstock aggregation, and selective process investment are best positioned to convert regulatory and market pressure into durable advantage. Continued investment in certification, pilot scaling, and knowledge sharing will be necessary to move from isolated successes to industry‑scale impact. In short, the transition toward responsible, economically viable recycling of composites depends on pragmatic, staged actions that marry technical feasibility with commercial contracts and policy alignment.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An integrative introduction that frames material complexity, innovation trajectories, and stakeholder incentives driving the evolution of fiber‑reinforced plastic recycling
The landscape of fiber‑reinforced plastic recycling sits at the intersection of urgent environmental objectives, accelerating material innovation, and shifting commercial incentives. The composite materials that deliver high strength‑to‑weight ratios across transportation, infrastructure, and energy sectors now present a circularity challenge: their durable, multi‑matrix construction complicates separation, recovery, and re‑integration into new products. As a result, stakeholders from original equipment manufacturers to material suppliers and public agencies are prioritizing strategies that convert end‑of‑life composites into feedstocks, performance components, or benign waste streams.
Concurrently, advances in chemical technologies, thermal recovery processes, and mechanical reprocessing have begun to reframe what recycling can accomplish for complex composites. Technology maturation is enabling novel end markets for recycled fibers and resins, while product design and procurement policies are emerging as levers to increase recyclability across the value chain. Taken together, these dynamics create an inflection point: organizations that adopt systems thinking and invest in scalable recovery routes stand to reduce lifecycle impacts, secure material supply resilience, and meet growing requirements from customers and regulators.
A detailed account of the regulatory, technological, and commercial paradigm shifts reshaping recovery and circularity practices for composite materials
Recent years have seen multiple transformative shifts that are reconfiguring the fiber‑reinforced plastic recycling landscape. First, regulatory and procurement pressures have moved beyond voluntary sustainability statements; they now mandate demonstrable end‑of‑life solutions and recycled content credentials, thereby forcing design and sourcing decisions upstream. Second, technological progress in areas such as pyrolysis, solvolysis, and advanced mechanical separation is expanding the repertoire of viable recovery pathways. These innovations are reducing the performance delta between virgin and recycled fibers, while also improving energy efficiency and process consistency.
Third, business model innovation is emerging as a critical force: extended producer responsibility schemes, take‑back services, and circular supply agreements increasingly align incentives across OEMs, recyclers, and material processors. Fourth, industry collaboration across material suppliers, recyclers, and end users is accelerating the emergence of standardized testing and certification protocols, which in turn reduce transaction friction for recycled content. Finally, capital allocation patterns indicate a growing willingness to fund demonstration facilities and scale‑up pilots, shifting the conversation from proof‑of‑concept to industrial deployment. Collectively, these shifts are establishing a new normal in which recyclability and circular procurement are integral to product and corporate strategy rather than peripheral sustainability initiatives.
An analysis of how 2025 tariff measures are recalibrating supply chain resilience, procurement incentives, and investment priorities in composite recycling
The introduction of new tariff measures affecting composite imports and downstream materials in 2025 has altered supply chain calculus and commercial incentives in important ways. Increased import costs have prompted original equipment manufacturers and processors to reevaluate sourcing strategies, accelerating interest in domestic recycling routes and localized supply networks. When import economics tighten, the relative attractiveness of recovered fibers and recycled resins improves, prompting procurement teams to pilot recycled inputs where technical parity can be demonstrated.
Moreover, tariff‑driven cost pressure has highlighted vulnerabilities in long, globalized value chains and made investment in resilient, regionalized processing assets more compelling. As a consequence, some manufacturers are rediscovering the strategic value of feedstock diversification and vertical integration. At the same time, tariffs have the potential to slow the adoption of higher‑value virgin composites in cost‑sensitive markets, thereby creating an opening for recycled material suppliers to capture displacement opportunities. In sum, these trade measures are not merely a near‑term cost shock; they are reshaping long‑term incentives around supply chain architecture, capital allocation for recycling infrastructure, and collaborative procurement models that prioritize domestic circularity.
Key segmentation insights revealing how end use sectors, product typologies, fiber chemistry, and process selection determine recycling feasibility and commercial pathways
Understanding where recycling yields the greatest technical and commercial gains requires segmentation by end use, product architecture, fiber chemistry, and process pathway. Across end use industries, Automotive And Transportation demand high performance recycled fibers and predictable mechanical properties to meet safety and durability standards, while Construction And Infrastructure prioritize cost‑effective bulk materials with long service lives and fire performance characteristics. Marine And Aerospace applications emphasize corrosion resistance, structural integrity, and regulatory certification, and Wind Energy presents a large volume, high‑volume laminate waste stream where blade recycling and material recovery are rapidly emerging as strategic priorities.
Product type matters because reprocessing requirements differ substantially between complex molded composites and simpler profiles, sheets, and plates. Composites often require targeted recovery approaches that account for embedded resins and fiber orientations, with thermoplastic composites being comparatively easier to reprocess than thermoset composites due to their inherent re‑melting and reshaping potential. Profiles and sheets & plates, by contrast, offer opportunities for mechanical re‑use or downcycling where dimensional stability is preserved. Fiber type further refines recovery strategies: Aramid Fiber presents chemical sensitivity that impacts depolymerization choices, Carbon Fiber demands careful handling to retain tensile properties, and Glass Fiber offers a balance of cost and recyclability with established mechanical recovery routes. Finally, the recycling process selection-whether chemical, mechanical, or thermal-drives the quality and applicability of recovered material. Chemical routes such as depolymerization and solvolysis are attractive when high‑purity feedstocks are needed, thermal options like pyrolysis can recover carbonaceous fibers and energy, and mechanical processing often provides pragmatic, lower‑capex pathways for volume‑oriented streams. Integrating these segmentation lenses helps stakeholders prioritize R&D, capital deployment, and strategic partnerships according to the specific performance and cost thresholds of each application.
Regionally specific insights into how policy frameworks, industrial capacity, and procurement practices are shaping recycling pathways across the Americas, Europe Middle East and Africa, and Asia Pacific
Regional dynamics are a decisive factor in shaping recycling strategies for fiber‑reinforced plastics, with distinct drivers and constraints emerging across the globe. In the Americas, policy emphasis on domestic manufacturing competitiveness and circular procurement is prompting investment in localized recycling capacity and collection infrastructure. North American OEMs are increasingly evaluating circular supply agreements and technology partnerships to secure recycled feedstocks that reduce exposure to volatile global logistics and trade measures.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks and extended producer responsibility schemes are pushing manufacturers and waste managers toward higher diversion rates and certified recovery processes, which in turn foster innovation in chemical recycling and certification protocols. European jurisdictions are also investing in standardization and end‑of‑life documentation systems that simplify cross‑border trade in recycled materials. In Asia‑Pacific, rapid manufacturing scale, diverse material flows, and strong original equipment production create both large recovery opportunities and logistical complexity. Policymakers and industry actors in the region are balancing the growth imperative with nascent circularity initiatives, while areas with heavy wind turbine and automotive manufacturing are becoming focal points for pilot recycling facilities. These regional contrasts underline the importance of aligning technology selection, partnership models, and policy engagement to local regulatory environments and industrial strengths.
An assessment of the competitive dynamics and partnership models that determine which players will scale recycling technologies and capture value across the composite materials value chain
Competitive dynamics in the recycling ecosystem are evolving as technology providers, material suppliers, and original equipment manufacturers converge on end‑of‑life solutions. Tiered specialization is emerging: pure‑play recyclers focus on scale and logistics, process innovators develop high‑value chemical and thermal recovery routes, and established material suppliers integrate recycled inputs to protect market position. Partnerships that combine feedstock aggregation, process engineering, and application know‑how are proving critical to close the loop at commercially relevant scales.
Additionally, licensing arrangements for proprietary recovery technologies are enabling faster market entry for recyclers while jointly funded demonstration projects de‑risk leading‑edge approaches. Corporations with product stewardship obligations are increasingly deploying procurement levers and supplier engagement programs to stimulate demand for recycled materials. Equity investors and corporate venture arms have begun to allocate capital toward companies that can demonstrate credible pathways from pilot to plant, which in turn drives consolidation and strategic alliances. Overall, the competitive landscape rewards organizations that align technical capability with off‑take agreements and that can navigate certification requirements to deliver traceable, quality‑assured recycled materials to demanding end markets.
Actionable, prioritized recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate commercial recycling adoption while managing technical and regulatory risk
Leaders who intend to shape the future of composite recycling should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions that accelerate adoption while managing risk. First, invest in selective pilot projects that validate performance claims under real operational conditions and that include third‑party testing to support certification. Second, design procurement policies that create credible demand signals for recycled inputs and that include staged volume commitments tied to quality criteria. Third, form targeted partnerships that combine feedstock aggregation, processing expertise, and product development capacity to bridge the interoperability gaps between suppliers and end users.
Fourth, embed circularity in product design by simplifying material constructions, favoring thermoplastics where appropriate, and standardizing interfaces to ease disassembly and sorting. Fifth, engage proactively with regulators and standards bodies to co‑design practical compliance pathways and testing protocols that recognize the specificities of fiber‑reinforced composites. Finally, align capital deployment with staged milestones and learnings from pilot facilities to avoid premature scale‑ups while maintaining momentum. These actions reduce technical and commercial uncertainty and position organizations to convert regulatory and market pressure into sustained competitive advantage.
A rigorous mixed‑methods research framework combining primary interviews, laboratory validation, process audits, and triangulated secondary evidence to ensure robust findings
This study employs a mixed‑methods research approach that integrates primary interviews, laboratory validation, process audits, and exhaustive secondary documentation. Primary research included structured discussions with technical leads at manufacturers, recycling operators, and materials scientists to capture operational constraints and technology readiness. Laboratory validation and pilot plant data were used to corroborate performance claims for chemical depolymerization, pyrolysis, and mechanical reprocessing, with particular attention to fiber retention, contaminant profiles, and energy intensity.
Secondary research drew on peer‑reviewed literature, standards documents, patent landscapes, and trade publications to establish baseline technical parameters and to map historical technology trajectories. Data triangulation techniques were applied to reconcile discrepancies among sources, and scenario analysis was used to test the sensitivity of strategic options to key variables such as feedstock quality and regulatory change. Quality assurance protocols included expert peer review, methodologically transparent assumptions, and versioned datasets to support reproducibility. The result is a rigorous evidence base that links laboratory findings to commercial deployment considerations and policy implications.
A conclusive synthesis emphasizing the interconnected steps needed across technology, procurement, and policy to scale composite recycling into durable industrial practice
The path to scalable recycling of fiber‑reinforced plastics is neither singular nor simple; it requires coordinated progress across technology, design, policy, and commercial collaboration. Progress to date demonstrates that a portfolio of recovery routes-mechanical, thermal, and chemical-can be deployed in complementary roles depending on feedstock composition and end use requirements. Importantly, aligning procurement practices and standards with demonstrable material performance reduces market friction and enables circular supply chains to emerge with economic credibility.
Looking ahead, stakeholders that integrate product redesign, localized feedstock aggregation, and selective process investment are best positioned to convert regulatory and market pressure into durable advantage. Continued investment in certification, pilot scaling, and knowledge sharing will be necessary to move from isolated successes to industry‑scale impact. In short, the transition toward responsible, economically viable recycling of composites depends on pragmatic, staged actions that marry technical feasibility with commercial contracts and policy alignment.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
198 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Collaborative R&D initiatives for closed-loop recycling of carbon fiber reinforced composites
- 5.2. Commercial-scale deployment of thermomechanical processes to separate fiber and resin phases in composite waste
- 5.3. Use of solvolysis techniques to recover high-strength glass fiber from wind turbine blade end-of-life composites
- 5.4. Integration of chemical recycling units into existing composites manufacturing lines for sustainable material loops
- 5.5. Adoption of digital traceability systems to track fiber-reinforced plastic materials through the recycling lifecycle
- 5.6. Strategic partnerships between OEMs and recyclers to establish supply chains for recycled carbon fiber materials
- 5.7. Development of bio-based resin formulations compatible with mechanical recycling of fiber composites
- 5.8. Regulatory frameworks mandating minimum recycled content in fiber-reinforced plastic products
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Fiber-reinforced Plastic Recycling Market, by End Use Industry
- 8.1. Automotive & Transportation
- 8.2. Construction & Infrastructure
- 8.3. Marine & Aerospace
- 8.4. Wind Energy
- 9. Fiber-reinforced Plastic Recycling Market, by Product Type
- 9.1. Composites
- 9.1.1. Thermoplastic Composites
- 9.1.2. Thermoset Composites
- 9.2. Profiles
- 9.3. Sheets & Plates
- 10. Fiber-reinforced Plastic Recycling Market, by Fiber Type
- 10.1. Aramid Fiber
- 10.2. Carbon Fiber
- 10.3. Glass Fiber
- 11. Fiber-reinforced Plastic Recycling Market, by Recycling Process
- 11.1. Chemical
- 11.1.1. Depolymerization
- 11.1.2. Solvolysis
- 11.2. Mechanical
- 11.3. Thermal
- 11.3.1. Incineration
- 11.3.2. Pyrolysis
- 12. Fiber-reinforced Plastic Recycling Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Fiber-reinforced Plastic Recycling Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Fiber-reinforced Plastic Recycling Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Aeron Composite Pvt Ltd
- 15.3.2. Carbon Conversions
- 15.3.3. Carbon Fiber Recycle Industry Co Ltd
- 15.3.4. Conenor Ltd
- 15.3.5. Eco-Wolf Inc
- 15.3.6. ELG Carbon Fibre Ltd
- 15.3.7. Gen 2 Carbon Limited
- 15.3.8. Global Fiberglass Solutions
- 15.3.9. Karborek Recycling Carbon Fibers
- 15.3.10. MBA Polymers Inc
- 15.3.11. MCR Mixt Composites Recyclables
- 15.3.12. Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials GmbH
- 15.3.13. neocomp GmbH
- 15.3.14. PLASTIC ENERGY Limited
- 15.3.15. Procotex
- 15.3.16. Republic Services Inc
- 15.3.17. SGL Carbon SE
- 15.3.18. SUEZ Recycling and Recovery
- 15.3.19. Toray Industries Inc
- 15.3.20. Ucomposites A/S
- 15.3.21. Vartega Inc
- 15.3.22. Veolia Environnement S.A.
- 15.3.23. Waste Management Inc
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
