Fast Attack Craft Market by Operation (Blue Water, Littoral), Propulsion Type (Combined, Diesel, Gas Turbine), Hull Material, Weapon System, Displacement, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Fast Attack Craft Market was valued at USD 13.24 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 14.14 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.00%, reaching USD 24.53 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive orientation to fast attack craft roles, design imperatives, and procurement trade-offs that shape operational readiness and capability planning
The fast attack craft landscape demands concise orientation for stakeholders grappling with technological complexity, evolving maritime threats, and shifting procurement priorities. This introduction synthesizes the vessel typologies, operational roles, and design trade-offs that define contemporary fast attack craft programs, connecting end-user requirements with engineering choices and industrial capabilities. It frames the subsequent analysis by clarifying operational envelopes, propulsion architectures, hull material options, and weapon system integration challenges that decision-makers must weigh when evaluating new builds, upgrades, or fleet retirements.
Beginning with operational context, these vessels operate across a spectrum from high-seas blue water missions to littoral interdiction and coastal patrol tasks, each imposing distinct endurance, seakeeping, and survivability criteria. Stakeholder objectives range from law enforcement and search and rescue to high-intensity conflict where missile and gun engagements are expected. As fuel efficiency, signature management, and modular mission payloads grow in importance, procurement planners face competing priorities that affect lifecycle costs, interoperability, and maintenance regimes. This introduction therefore orients readers to the technical and policy threads that underpin later sections, establishing a foundation for strategic decisions and program-level trade-offs.
How propulsion, hull advances, and modular payload strategies are converging to redefine operational doctrine and lifecycle priorities for fast attack craft
The landscape for fast attack craft is undergoing transformative shifts driven by advances in propulsion, materials science, and distributed lethality concepts. Propulsion innovations have reduced barriers to higher sustained speeds while improving fuel efficiency, enabling craft to operate further from basing points and remain mission-effective for longer periods. At the same time, hull material developments and hybrid construction techniques are reshaping survivability and signature management, permitting lighter structures with comparable strength and reduced radar and acoustic footprints. These engineering trends are accompanied by new approaches to modular weapons and sensor payloads that make rapid reconfiguration for mission-specific tasks more practical than in previous generations.
Concurrently, operational doctrine is evolving. Navies and coast guards increasingly value platforms that can perform layered missions across both blue water and littoral environments, emphasizing distributed operations, network-enabled targeting, and integration with unmanned systems. Industrially, supply chain resilience and strategic sourcing are more prominent in program planning as geopolitical uncertainty alters access to key components. Taken together, technological advances, doctrinal shifts, and procurement resilience strategies are creating a fast attack craft ecosystem that prizes adaptability, low observable attributes, and integrated systems engineering, compelling stakeholders to rethink lifecycle planning and interoperability objectives.
Assessing how 2025 U.S. tariff adjustments and tightened export controls have reshaped supply chains, procurement timelines, and industrial responses for fast attack craft programs
Policy measures announced and implemented in the United States during 2025 have introduced new compliance obligations and cost considerations for international procurement of maritime components and assembled platforms. Tariff adjustments, coupled with tighter export controls on critical electronics and propulsion subsystems, have altered sourcing strategies for navies and shipbuilders that previously relied on cross-border supplier networks. These policy shifts have prompted procurement planners to re-evaluate supplier qualification, incorporate alternative sourcing pathways, and factor in longer lead times for sensitive subsystems that are subject to export review.
The cumulative impact extends beyond immediate procurement schedules. Shipyards are reassessing vertical integration opportunities to insulate programs from tariff fluctuations and control critical component fabrication domestically where feasible. In parallel, defense industrial base actors are accelerating investment in qualifying substitute materials and domestic manufacturing capabilities for items such as specialized gas turbines, advanced composites, and precision sensors. For international partners, these changes have transactional implications for existing contracts and strategic implications for alliance interoperability. Consequently, program managers are increasingly including compliance and tariff-risk mitigation as part of program risk registers and procurement governance frameworks, seeking contractual mechanisms and supplier diversification to preserve schedule and capability objectives.
Integrated segmentation perspective linking operation profiles, end-user demands, propulsion architectures, hull materials, weapon fitment, and displacement bands to platform selection dynamics
Robust segmentation analysis highlights how operational demands and technical configurations intersect to determine platform suitability and procurement priorities. Based on operation, the distinction between blue water and littoral employment defines fundamental requirements for endurance, seakeeping, and crew accommodations, with blue water profiles emphasizing longer range and autonomous systems integration while littoral missions prioritize shallow-draft maneuverability and rapid response characteristics. Based on end user, capability needs diverge between coast guard missions that emphasize constabulary roles and persistent presence, military end users that require higher survivability and lethality, and patrol forces that balance interdiction with deterrence; these differences influence weapon fit, sensor suites, and crew training regimens.
Propulsion type segmentation further clarifies trade-offs: combined propulsion architectures-encompassing combined diesel and diesel, combined diesel and gas, and combined diesel and gas electric-offer hybridized performance envelopes that can reconcile efficiency with burst speed, whereas pure diesel and gas turbine approaches lean towards fuel economy or high-speed dash capability respectively. Hull material segmentation differentiates between aluminum, composite, and steel constructions, with composite options such as carbon fiber, glass fiber, and Kevlar composite delivering weight and signature advantages and steel variants including high tensile steel and stainless steel providing robustness and damage tolerance. Weapon system segmentation across guns, missiles, and torpedo installations dictates magazine arrangements, fire-control integration, and structural reinforcement. Finally, displacement bands from under 500 tonnes through 500 to 1000 tonnes and above 1000 tonnes correspond to platform roles, embarked endurance, and sustainment complexity. Collectively, these segmentation dimensions explain why platform selection is a synthesis of operational doctrine, engineering compromises, and lifecycle considerations rather than a singular technical choice.
How regional security dynamics and industrial capabilities in the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific are shaping divergent procurement and sustainment strategies
Regional dynamics exert a decisive influence on procurement philosophies, industrial participation, and operational requirements. In the Americas, emphasis on coastal security, fisheries protection, and partnership patrols has driven investment in versatile patrol and fast attack platforms that can support multinational exercises, humanitarian assistance, and interagency missions. Industrial ecosystems in the region balance domestic shipbuilding capabilities with access to high-quality subsystems, prompting stakeholders to prioritize interoperability with partner navies and compliance with regional trade frameworks.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, geopolitical volatility, expeditionary requirements, and alliance interoperability are prioritizing platforms with adaptable weapons and sensor suites and strong logistics footprints. European producers have advanced modular design approaches that facilitate rapid configuration for expeditionary operations while Middle East and African buyers often seek packaged solutions combining training, sustainment, and technology transfer. In the Asia-Pacific, contested maritime domains and an increasing focus on distributed lethality have driven demand for fast, low-observable platforms with advanced missile integration and networked targeting. Regional shipyards are scaling up to meet national fleet ambitions and to localize high-value subsystems, reflecting a strategic imperative to combine sovereign capability development with international industrial partnerships. These regional nuances drive divergent procurement timelines, sustainment arrangements, and systems-integration priorities across the globe.
Why systems integration, lifecycle services, and localized industrial partnerships are the defining competitive differentiators for fast attack craft suppliers
Leading firms and national shipbuilders are focusing on systems integration, lifecycle support, and export-compliant supply chains to sustain competitive positioning. Companies with proven expertise in modular mission bays, flexible integration of weapons and sensors, and track records of customer support are increasingly favored by procurement agencies seeking to reduce integration risk and accelerate entry-into-service timelines. In addition, firms investing in advanced propulsion partnerships, composite fabrication techniques, and locally based sustainment hubs are better positioned to meet evolving end-user preferences for lower logistical burdens and improved sortie rates.
Strategic alliances and joint ventures are also influencing competitive dynamics. Collaborative efforts that combine shipbuilding capacity with specialist subsystem providers enable faster technology transfer and localized production, which can be especially attractive for buyers contending with import restrictions or tariff-related cost pressures. Furthermore, suppliers emphasizing digital engineering, predictive maintenance platforms, and obsolescence management provide tangible lifecycle benefits that resonate with naval planners aiming to extend platform relevance in fast-evolving threat environments. As a result, company differentiation increasingly hinges on the ability to offer integrated capability packages rather than isolated platform deliveries.
Actionable priorities for suppliers and program managers to enhance modularity, supply chain resilience, digital sustainment, and allied partnerships for sustained operational advantage
Industry leaders should prioritize modularity, supply chain resilience, and interoperable systems engineering to ensure relevance in complex maritime theaters. Investing in modular mission bays and open-architecture combat systems enables quicker re-role capability and reduces upgrade costs over a platform's service life, allowing navies to respond to fast-changing threat profiles without wholesale platform replacement. Complementing that approach, a deliberate strategy to diversify suppliers of critical components and to qualify alternate manufacturing sources mitigates exposure to tariff shifts and export-control disruptions, preserving schedule integrity and operational availability.
Moreover, actionable investment in digital tools-such as model-based systems engineering, digital twins, and predictive maintenance analytics-can materially reduce sustainment burdens and improve availability rates. Leaders should also strengthen partnerships with allied industrial bases to secure supply-chain redundancy while negotiating offset and technology-transfer arrangements that align with national industrial policy goals. Finally, embedding lifecycle support contracts and comprehensive training packages into procurement proposals enhances value proposition and reduces total ownership friction for end users, positioning suppliers as long-term capability partners rather than one-off vendors.
A multi-source, expert-validated methodology combining technical literature review, structured expert elicitation, and comparative capability mapping to assess platform trade-offs and risks
This research synthesizes open-source literature, technical standards, defense white papers, and expert interviews to construct a multi-dimensional understanding of fast attack craft capabilities and procurement considerations. Primary inputs include engineering design documents, publicly available program specifications, defense procurement notices, and industry press releases, which are triangulated with subject-matter expert consultations to validate technical feasibility, integration complexity, and operational suitability. Where direct primary data was unavailable, structured expert elicitation informed assumptions about integration timelines, supply-chain dependencies, and platform lifecycle implications.
Analytical techniques applied include comparative capability mapping across propulsion, hull material, and armament alternatives, as well as risk assessment frameworks for supplier dependency and regulatory exposure. The methodology emphasizes transparency in source attribution and sensitivity testing for supply-chain and policy shock scenarios. Quality assurance processes involved cross-validation with multiple independent sources and iterative review cycles with domain experts to ensure technical accuracy and to surface divergent viewpoints on trade-offs between speed, survivability, and sustainment. This blended-method approach supports robust, defensible conclusions while acknowledging areas where program-specific assessments are required.
Strategic synthesis emphasizing modular design, lifecycle planning, and industrial resilience as the pathway to enduring fast attack craft capability and operational adaptability
In conclusion, the fast attack craft domain is defined by intersecting pressures: technological innovation, evolving operational doctrine, and shifting policy landscapes. Platform choices increasingly reflect a synthesis of modularity, propulsion trade-offs, and material science advancements rather than purely single-metric optimization. Operationally, navies and coast guards require adaptable platforms capable of performing across blue water and littoral environments while supporting varying end-user priorities from constabulary missions to high-intensity conflict engagements. Industrially, resilience in sourcing and the ability to localize high-value activities are now central to program success.
Looking ahead, stakeholders that adopt systems-level thinking-integrating digital engineering, lifecycle support, and supplier diversification-will have a tangible advantage in maintaining fleet readiness and adapting to emergent threats. Strategic procurement decisions should therefore be grounded in rigorous risk assessment, an appreciation for interoperability constraints, and a commitment to sustainment planning that extends platform relevance. By aligning technical choices with operational doctrine and industrial strategy, program managers can deliver capable, maintainable forces that meet contemporary security needs while allowing flexibility for future technological insertion.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive orientation to fast attack craft roles, design imperatives, and procurement trade-offs that shape operational readiness and capability planning
The fast attack craft landscape demands concise orientation for stakeholders grappling with technological complexity, evolving maritime threats, and shifting procurement priorities. This introduction synthesizes the vessel typologies, operational roles, and design trade-offs that define contemporary fast attack craft programs, connecting end-user requirements with engineering choices and industrial capabilities. It frames the subsequent analysis by clarifying operational envelopes, propulsion architectures, hull material options, and weapon system integration challenges that decision-makers must weigh when evaluating new builds, upgrades, or fleet retirements.
Beginning with operational context, these vessels operate across a spectrum from high-seas blue water missions to littoral interdiction and coastal patrol tasks, each imposing distinct endurance, seakeeping, and survivability criteria. Stakeholder objectives range from law enforcement and search and rescue to high-intensity conflict where missile and gun engagements are expected. As fuel efficiency, signature management, and modular mission payloads grow in importance, procurement planners face competing priorities that affect lifecycle costs, interoperability, and maintenance regimes. This introduction therefore orients readers to the technical and policy threads that underpin later sections, establishing a foundation for strategic decisions and program-level trade-offs.
How propulsion, hull advances, and modular payload strategies are converging to redefine operational doctrine and lifecycle priorities for fast attack craft
The landscape for fast attack craft is undergoing transformative shifts driven by advances in propulsion, materials science, and distributed lethality concepts. Propulsion innovations have reduced barriers to higher sustained speeds while improving fuel efficiency, enabling craft to operate further from basing points and remain mission-effective for longer periods. At the same time, hull material developments and hybrid construction techniques are reshaping survivability and signature management, permitting lighter structures with comparable strength and reduced radar and acoustic footprints. These engineering trends are accompanied by new approaches to modular weapons and sensor payloads that make rapid reconfiguration for mission-specific tasks more practical than in previous generations.
Concurrently, operational doctrine is evolving. Navies and coast guards increasingly value platforms that can perform layered missions across both blue water and littoral environments, emphasizing distributed operations, network-enabled targeting, and integration with unmanned systems. Industrially, supply chain resilience and strategic sourcing are more prominent in program planning as geopolitical uncertainty alters access to key components. Taken together, technological advances, doctrinal shifts, and procurement resilience strategies are creating a fast attack craft ecosystem that prizes adaptability, low observable attributes, and integrated systems engineering, compelling stakeholders to rethink lifecycle planning and interoperability objectives.
Assessing how 2025 U.S. tariff adjustments and tightened export controls have reshaped supply chains, procurement timelines, and industrial responses for fast attack craft programs
Policy measures announced and implemented in the United States during 2025 have introduced new compliance obligations and cost considerations for international procurement of maritime components and assembled platforms. Tariff adjustments, coupled with tighter export controls on critical electronics and propulsion subsystems, have altered sourcing strategies for navies and shipbuilders that previously relied on cross-border supplier networks. These policy shifts have prompted procurement planners to re-evaluate supplier qualification, incorporate alternative sourcing pathways, and factor in longer lead times for sensitive subsystems that are subject to export review.
The cumulative impact extends beyond immediate procurement schedules. Shipyards are reassessing vertical integration opportunities to insulate programs from tariff fluctuations and control critical component fabrication domestically where feasible. In parallel, defense industrial base actors are accelerating investment in qualifying substitute materials and domestic manufacturing capabilities for items such as specialized gas turbines, advanced composites, and precision sensors. For international partners, these changes have transactional implications for existing contracts and strategic implications for alliance interoperability. Consequently, program managers are increasingly including compliance and tariff-risk mitigation as part of program risk registers and procurement governance frameworks, seeking contractual mechanisms and supplier diversification to preserve schedule and capability objectives.
Integrated segmentation perspective linking operation profiles, end-user demands, propulsion architectures, hull materials, weapon fitment, and displacement bands to platform selection dynamics
Robust segmentation analysis highlights how operational demands and technical configurations intersect to determine platform suitability and procurement priorities. Based on operation, the distinction between blue water and littoral employment defines fundamental requirements for endurance, seakeeping, and crew accommodations, with blue water profiles emphasizing longer range and autonomous systems integration while littoral missions prioritize shallow-draft maneuverability and rapid response characteristics. Based on end user, capability needs diverge between coast guard missions that emphasize constabulary roles and persistent presence, military end users that require higher survivability and lethality, and patrol forces that balance interdiction with deterrence; these differences influence weapon fit, sensor suites, and crew training regimens.
Propulsion type segmentation further clarifies trade-offs: combined propulsion architectures-encompassing combined diesel and diesel, combined diesel and gas, and combined diesel and gas electric-offer hybridized performance envelopes that can reconcile efficiency with burst speed, whereas pure diesel and gas turbine approaches lean towards fuel economy or high-speed dash capability respectively. Hull material segmentation differentiates between aluminum, composite, and steel constructions, with composite options such as carbon fiber, glass fiber, and Kevlar composite delivering weight and signature advantages and steel variants including high tensile steel and stainless steel providing robustness and damage tolerance. Weapon system segmentation across guns, missiles, and torpedo installations dictates magazine arrangements, fire-control integration, and structural reinforcement. Finally, displacement bands from under 500 tonnes through 500 to 1000 tonnes and above 1000 tonnes correspond to platform roles, embarked endurance, and sustainment complexity. Collectively, these segmentation dimensions explain why platform selection is a synthesis of operational doctrine, engineering compromises, and lifecycle considerations rather than a singular technical choice.
How regional security dynamics and industrial capabilities in the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific are shaping divergent procurement and sustainment strategies
Regional dynamics exert a decisive influence on procurement philosophies, industrial participation, and operational requirements. In the Americas, emphasis on coastal security, fisheries protection, and partnership patrols has driven investment in versatile patrol and fast attack platforms that can support multinational exercises, humanitarian assistance, and interagency missions. Industrial ecosystems in the region balance domestic shipbuilding capabilities with access to high-quality subsystems, prompting stakeholders to prioritize interoperability with partner navies and compliance with regional trade frameworks.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, geopolitical volatility, expeditionary requirements, and alliance interoperability are prioritizing platforms with adaptable weapons and sensor suites and strong logistics footprints. European producers have advanced modular design approaches that facilitate rapid configuration for expeditionary operations while Middle East and African buyers often seek packaged solutions combining training, sustainment, and technology transfer. In the Asia-Pacific, contested maritime domains and an increasing focus on distributed lethality have driven demand for fast, low-observable platforms with advanced missile integration and networked targeting. Regional shipyards are scaling up to meet national fleet ambitions and to localize high-value subsystems, reflecting a strategic imperative to combine sovereign capability development with international industrial partnerships. These regional nuances drive divergent procurement timelines, sustainment arrangements, and systems-integration priorities across the globe.
Why systems integration, lifecycle services, and localized industrial partnerships are the defining competitive differentiators for fast attack craft suppliers
Leading firms and national shipbuilders are focusing on systems integration, lifecycle support, and export-compliant supply chains to sustain competitive positioning. Companies with proven expertise in modular mission bays, flexible integration of weapons and sensors, and track records of customer support are increasingly favored by procurement agencies seeking to reduce integration risk and accelerate entry-into-service timelines. In addition, firms investing in advanced propulsion partnerships, composite fabrication techniques, and locally based sustainment hubs are better positioned to meet evolving end-user preferences for lower logistical burdens and improved sortie rates.
Strategic alliances and joint ventures are also influencing competitive dynamics. Collaborative efforts that combine shipbuilding capacity with specialist subsystem providers enable faster technology transfer and localized production, which can be especially attractive for buyers contending with import restrictions or tariff-related cost pressures. Furthermore, suppliers emphasizing digital engineering, predictive maintenance platforms, and obsolescence management provide tangible lifecycle benefits that resonate with naval planners aiming to extend platform relevance in fast-evolving threat environments. As a result, company differentiation increasingly hinges on the ability to offer integrated capability packages rather than isolated platform deliveries.
Actionable priorities for suppliers and program managers to enhance modularity, supply chain resilience, digital sustainment, and allied partnerships for sustained operational advantage
Industry leaders should prioritize modularity, supply chain resilience, and interoperable systems engineering to ensure relevance in complex maritime theaters. Investing in modular mission bays and open-architecture combat systems enables quicker re-role capability and reduces upgrade costs over a platform's service life, allowing navies to respond to fast-changing threat profiles without wholesale platform replacement. Complementing that approach, a deliberate strategy to diversify suppliers of critical components and to qualify alternate manufacturing sources mitigates exposure to tariff shifts and export-control disruptions, preserving schedule integrity and operational availability.
Moreover, actionable investment in digital tools-such as model-based systems engineering, digital twins, and predictive maintenance analytics-can materially reduce sustainment burdens and improve availability rates. Leaders should also strengthen partnerships with allied industrial bases to secure supply-chain redundancy while negotiating offset and technology-transfer arrangements that align with national industrial policy goals. Finally, embedding lifecycle support contracts and comprehensive training packages into procurement proposals enhances value proposition and reduces total ownership friction for end users, positioning suppliers as long-term capability partners rather than one-off vendors.
A multi-source, expert-validated methodology combining technical literature review, structured expert elicitation, and comparative capability mapping to assess platform trade-offs and risks
This research synthesizes open-source literature, technical standards, defense white papers, and expert interviews to construct a multi-dimensional understanding of fast attack craft capabilities and procurement considerations. Primary inputs include engineering design documents, publicly available program specifications, defense procurement notices, and industry press releases, which are triangulated with subject-matter expert consultations to validate technical feasibility, integration complexity, and operational suitability. Where direct primary data was unavailable, structured expert elicitation informed assumptions about integration timelines, supply-chain dependencies, and platform lifecycle implications.
Analytical techniques applied include comparative capability mapping across propulsion, hull material, and armament alternatives, as well as risk assessment frameworks for supplier dependency and regulatory exposure. The methodology emphasizes transparency in source attribution and sensitivity testing for supply-chain and policy shock scenarios. Quality assurance processes involved cross-validation with multiple independent sources and iterative review cycles with domain experts to ensure technical accuracy and to surface divergent viewpoints on trade-offs between speed, survivability, and sustainment. This blended-method approach supports robust, defensible conclusions while acknowledging areas where program-specific assessments are required.
Strategic synthesis emphasizing modular design, lifecycle planning, and industrial resilience as the pathway to enduring fast attack craft capability and operational adaptability
In conclusion, the fast attack craft domain is defined by intersecting pressures: technological innovation, evolving operational doctrine, and shifting policy landscapes. Platform choices increasingly reflect a synthesis of modularity, propulsion trade-offs, and material science advancements rather than purely single-metric optimization. Operationally, navies and coast guards require adaptable platforms capable of performing across blue water and littoral environments while supporting varying end-user priorities from constabulary missions to high-intensity conflict engagements. Industrially, resilience in sourcing and the ability to localize high-value activities are now central to program success.
Looking ahead, stakeholders that adopt systems-level thinking-integrating digital engineering, lifecycle support, and supplier diversification-will have a tangible advantage in maintaining fleet readiness and adapting to emergent threats. Strategic procurement decisions should therefore be grounded in rigorous risk assessment, an appreciation for interoperability constraints, and a commitment to sustainment planning that extends platform relevance. By aligning technical choices with operational doctrine and industrial strategy, program managers can deliver capable, maintainable forces that meet contemporary security needs while allowing flexibility for future technological insertion.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of autonomous navigation and remote control systems in fast attack craft for enhanced operational flexibility
- 5.2. Adoption of stealth design principles and signature reduction technologies in modern patrol boats for littoral operations
- 5.3. Integration of vertical launch systems and advanced anti-ship missiles on compact high-speed naval platforms for distributed lethality
- 5.4. Development of modular mission payload bays enabling rapid reconfiguration of weapon and sensor suites on fast attack vessels
- 5.5. Implementation of network-centric warfare architectures and real-time C4ISR integration for coordinated swarm engagements in coastal defense
- 5.6. Evolution of hull form design with composite materials and wave-piercing technology for sustained high-speed performance in rough seas
- 5.7. Incorporation of hybrid electric propulsion systems and fuel-efficient engines to extend operational endurance and reduce acoustic signatures
- 5.8. Utilization of digital twin modeling and predictive maintenance analytics to optimize lifecycle management and reduce downtime costs
- 5.9. Shifts in regional export regulations and defense cooperation agreements driving increased procurement of fast attack craft by ASEAN navies
- 5.10. Emphasis on unmanned surface vessel wingman tactics complementing manned fast attack craft in high-threat maritime environments
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Fast Attack Craft Market, by Operation
- 8.1. Blue Water
- 8.2. Littoral
- 9. Fast Attack Craft Market, by Propulsion Type
- 9.1. Combined
- 9.1.1. Combined Diesel And Diesel
- 9.1.2. Combined Diesel And Gas
- 9.1.3. Combined Diesel And Gas Electric
- 9.2. Diesel
- 9.3. Gas Turbine
- 10. Fast Attack Craft Market, by Hull Material
- 10.1. Aluminum
- 10.2. Composite
- 10.2.1. Carbon Fiber
- 10.2.2. Glass Fiber
- 10.2.3. Kevlar Composite
- 10.3. Steel
- 10.3.1. High Tensile Steel
- 10.3.2. Stainless Steel
- 11. Fast Attack Craft Market, by Weapon System
- 11.1. Guns
- 11.2. Missiles
- 11.3. Torpedo
- 12. Fast Attack Craft Market, by Displacement
- 12.1. 500 To 1000 Tonnes
- 12.2. Above 1000 Tonnes
- 12.3. Under 500 Tonnes
- 13. Fast Attack Craft Market, by End User
- 13.1. Coast Guard
- 13.2. Military
- 13.3. Patrol
- 14. Fast Attack Craft Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Fast Attack Craft Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Fast Attack Craft Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Abu Dhabi Ship Building PJSC
- 17.3.2. Austal Limited
- 17.3.3. BAE Systems plc
- 17.3.4. China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation (CSIC) / China Shipbuilding & Offshore International Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.5. Damen Shipyards Group
- 17.3.6. Fincantieri S.p.A.
- 17.3.7. Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd. (GRSE)
- 17.3.8. Goa Shipyard Limited (GSL)
- 17.3.9. Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction Co. Ltd.
- 17.3.10. Israel Shipyards Ltd.
- 17.3.11. Lürssen Werft GmbH & Co. KG
- 17.3.12. Naval Group
- 17.3.13. Navantia S.A.
- 17.3.14. PT PAL Indonesia (Persero)
- 17.3.15. ST Engineering Ltd
- 17.3.16. ThyssenKrupp Group
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
