Facial Implant Market by Material (Hydroxyapatite, Polyetheretherketone, Porous Polyethylene), Application (Cheek Reconstruction, Chin Augmentation, Future Innovations), End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Facial Implant Market was valued at USD 3.99 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.42 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 10.94%, reaching USD 9.16 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction to how clinical demand, biomaterials innovation, and procedural digitization are reshaping facial implant development and adoption
Facial implants sit at the intersection of reconstructive necessity and aesthetic aspiration, driven by advances in biomaterials, digital planning, and minimally invasive techniques. Clinicians and product developers are navigating a landscape where patient expectations for natural outcomes and rapid recovery increasingly determine procedural choice, while payers and regulatory authorities scrutinize evidence of safety and value. Consequently, the field demands integrative thinking that connects clinical efficacy, supply chain resilience, and technological differentiation.
As an introduction to the current state of the facial implant domain, this section outlines the primary forces shaping practice patterns and commercial strategies. Surgical teams are integrating three-dimensional imaging and custom implant design to improve fit and reduce intraoperative modification. Meanwhile, manufacturers are pursuing materials innovation to balance biocompatibility, mechanical performance, and ease of use. Taken together, these trends are accelerating adoption of tailored solutions in both reconstructive and cosmetic contexts, creating new entry points for collaboration among clinicians, engineers, and distributors.
Definitive overview of the transformative technological, clinical, and regulatory shifts redefining product development and clinical adoption in facial implants
The landscape for facial implants is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology, regulatory emphasis, and patient-centric care models. Emerging additive manufacturing techniques allow for patient-specific geometries that reduce operative time and enhance anatomical conformity, while concurrently enabling iterative design cycles that respond to surgeon feedback more rapidly than traditional manufacturing methods. At the same time, the regulatory environment is becoming more outcomes-focused, prompting developers to invest in robust clinical evidence and post-market surveillance to sustain product adoption.
Concurrently, the rise of minimally invasive approaches and scar-minimizing techniques is changing perioperative expectations, placing a premium on implant profiles that integrate seamlessly with soft tissue dynamics. Economic pressures and the need for streamlined procurement are encouraging healthcare providers to favor partners who can demonstrate supply chain transparency and scalability. As a result, companies that combine materials science excellence, digital capability, and clear clinical value propositions are best positioned to convert these transformative shifts into durable competitive advantage.
In-depth analysis of how 2025 U.S. tariff changes are reshaping supply chains, procurement strategies, and competitive positioning across the facial implant value chain
Tariff adjustments affecting trade flows in 2025 have introduced new headwinds and strategic considerations for stakeholders across the facial implant ecosystem. Elevated import duties and broader trade policy shifts create immediate cost pressure for manufacturers dependent on cross-border sourcing of raw polymers, advanced ceramics, and precision machinery. As supply chain expenses increase, companies face choices about absorbing costs, passing them to buyers, or redesigning procurement strategies to preserve margin without compromising clinical performance.
In response, many organizations are accelerating supplier diversification and nearshoring initiatives to reduce exposure to single-country dependencies. This trend is complemented by intensifying collaboration with contract manufacturers that can localize production of critical implant components while maintaining quality systems aligned with international regulatory frameworks. Moreover, purchasers and clinical networks are reassessing vendor agreements to include contingencies for tariff volatility, emphasizing contract flexibility and inventory optimization. Taken together, these adjustments illustrate how trade policy can catalyze structural supply chain resilience, influence pricing dynamics, and redefine competitive positioning across the industry.
Strategic segmentation insights highlighting how biomaterial choices, clinical applications, end-user requirements, and distribution models collectively drive product and commercial priorities
Material selection remains foundational to product differentiation in facial implants, with distinct trade-offs between mechanical behavior, biocompatibility, and surgical handling. Hydroxyapatite offers osteoconductive properties favored in bone-integrative reconstructions, while polyetheretherketone provides a favorable strength-to-weight ratio and radiolucency preferred in load-bearing or imaging-sensitive applications. Porous polyethylene delivers soft-tissue integration and contouring ease that surgeons value in select reconstructive cases, and silicone retains a long-standing role where malleability and predictable aesthetic shaping are prioritized.
Application-driven segmentation highlights clinical pathways where implant design must align with anatomical and functional objectives. Cheek reconstruction demands volumetric support and soft tissue conformity, whereas chin augmentation focuses on stable projection and load distribution. Nasal contouring and orbital reconstruction impose unique geometric and tissue-interface requirements that favor specialized materials and fixation systems. Future innovations, particularly customized 3D printing and minimally invasive techniques, are converging to enable implants that are both patient-specific and compatible with less invasive delivery methods, creating opportunities for faster recovery and improved cosmetic outcomes.
End-user dynamics influence product packaging, training needs, and service models. Aesthetic clinics and day clinics emphasize streamlined implant systems that facilitate outpatient procedures and fast turnover, while med spas-whether chain or independent-are increasingly involved in preprocedural consultations and adjunctive aesthetic care. Ambulatory surgical centers prioritize sterilization workflows and inventory predictability, and hospitals-both government and private-require demonstrable clinical evidence and integration with electronic health systems. Distribution strategies reflect these end-user nuances, with direct sales supporting clinical education and account management, distributors enabling broad geographic reach, and online channels through company websites and third-party e-commerce facilitating access for repeat purchases or smaller-volume buyers.
Critical regional intelligence describing how distinct regulatory, clinical, and commercial conditions across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape strategic priorities
Regional dynamics exert significant influence on product development priorities, regulatory strategy, and commercial channels for facial implants. The Americas present diverse payer landscapes and high procedural volumes that favor innovations demonstrating clinical differentiation and clear value in outpatient settings. In this region, demand for customizable implants and integrated surgical planning is rising, and providers increasingly seek partnerships that support training and rapid product replenishment.
Europe, the Middle East & Africa exhibit heterogeneous regulatory frameworks and procurement practices, which require adaptable market entry strategies. In mature European markets, clinical evidence and compliance with stringent device regulations are critical to adoption, whereas markets across the Middle East and Africa may prioritize cost-effective solutions and partnerships that build local clinical capacity. Asia-Pacific shows rapid uptake of aesthetic procedures alongside investment in domestic manufacturing capabilities, which amplifies competition but also drives innovation in cost-efficient materials and scalable production techniques. Across regions, success depends on tailoring product portfolios, distribution approaches, and clinical engagement models to local regulatory expectations and care delivery settings.
Actionable company-level intelligence revealing how innovation, partnerships, and commercialization capabilities determine leadership and disruption potential in the facial implant sector
Competitive dynamics in the facial implant landscape are defined by a mix of established medical device manufacturers, specialized reconstructive product developers, and emerging technology firms advancing additive manufacturing and digital surgical planning. Leading organizations invest in translational research to validate biomaterials, enhance sterilization and packaging, and ensure compatibility with imaging modalities, positioning their portfolios to meet both reconstructive and aesthetic indications. At the same time, agile challengers focus on narrow clinical niches or novel delivery mechanisms, using focused clinical partnerships to generate adoption momentum.
Commercial strategies increasingly emphasize integrated service offerings that combine product supply with surgeon training, digital planning tools, and post-market clinical support. Strategic collaborations between implant developers and contract manufacturers enable scalable production while preserving proprietary design elements. Mergers, acquisitions, and targeted investments are concentrating technological capabilities around firms that can demonstrate a pathway from R&D to regulatory approval and clinical integration. Ultimately, companies that balance technical excellence with robust commercialization infrastructure and clinician-centric support are most likely to secure preferential positioning with high-volume surgical centers and progressive aesthetic practices.
Practical, high-impact recommendations for manufacturers and providers to strengthen innovation pipelines, supply chains, clinician adoption, and commercial execution in facial implants
Industry leaders should prioritize an integrated approach that aligns product innovation with supply chain resilience and clinician engagement to achieve sustainable growth. First, invest in modular design and validated biomaterials that allow rapid customization while streamlining regulatory submissions and manufacturing workflows. Second, diversify sourcing and consider regional manufacturing partnerships to mitigate tariff exposure and reduce lead times for key markets, thereby preserving competitive pricing and service reliability.
Third, enhance commercial differentiation by offering surgeon-focused digital planning tools and structured training programs that reduce the learning curve for new implant technologies. Fourth, formalize value-based evidence generation through registries and post-market studies that address payer concerns and accelerate hospital adoption. Fifth, develop flexible distribution models that blend direct clinical support for high-touch accounts with distributor partnerships and e-commerce options to reach smaller-volume buyers. By executing these steps in parallel, leaders can increase agility, deepen clinical trust, and position their organizations to capture opportunities presented by technological and regulatory change.
Transparent explanation of the multi-layered research methodology combining clinical interviews, literature triangulation, supply chain mapping, and expert validation to ensure robust insight generation
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined primary stakeholder engagement, clinical literature review, and supply chain mapping to produce a validated assessment of industry dynamics. Primary engagement included in-depth interviews with practicing surgeons, procurement officers, regulatory experts, and manufacturing partners to capture real-world insights on material performance, procedural preferences, and commercial constraints. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with peer-reviewed clinical studies and device safety literature to ensure the analysis reflected current evidence on outcomes and complications.
Supply chain mapping identified critical nodes for raw materials, precision tooling, and sterilization services, and scenario analysis was used to explore the implications of trade policy shifts. Validation workshops with independent clinical advisors and industry specialists were conducted to refine assumptions and highlight practical considerations for adoption. Limitations of the methodology include variability in regional regulatory timelines and the evolving nature of additive manufacturing standards, which require ongoing monitoring. Overall, the approach balances depth of clinical insight with practical commercial analysis to support strategic decision-making.
Concise conclusion synthesizing how biomaterials advances, procedural innovation, and strategic commercial adaptation will determine long-term success in the facial implant arena
In summary, the facial implant sector is at a pivotal moment defined by converging technological, clinical, and commercial forces. Advances in biomaterials, customizable manufacturing, and minimally invasive delivery are expanding the possibilities for improved patient outcomes, while trade policy and regional regulatory variation are reshaping supply chain and market entry considerations. Stakeholders who align material innovation with rigorous clinical evidence and resilient procurement strategies will be best placed to meet rising procedural expectations and to scale responsibly across diverse care settings.
Looking ahead, success will depend on cross-functional collaboration between surgeons, materials scientists, and commercial teams to translate technical advantages into tangible clinical benefits. Organizations that proactively invest in clinician education, localized manufacturing flexibility, and evidence generation will not only respond to immediate headwinds but also create durable advantages in a market increasingly defined by customization, quality, and service excellence.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction to how clinical demand, biomaterials innovation, and procedural digitization are reshaping facial implant development and adoption
Facial implants sit at the intersection of reconstructive necessity and aesthetic aspiration, driven by advances in biomaterials, digital planning, and minimally invasive techniques. Clinicians and product developers are navigating a landscape where patient expectations for natural outcomes and rapid recovery increasingly determine procedural choice, while payers and regulatory authorities scrutinize evidence of safety and value. Consequently, the field demands integrative thinking that connects clinical efficacy, supply chain resilience, and technological differentiation.
As an introduction to the current state of the facial implant domain, this section outlines the primary forces shaping practice patterns and commercial strategies. Surgical teams are integrating three-dimensional imaging and custom implant design to improve fit and reduce intraoperative modification. Meanwhile, manufacturers are pursuing materials innovation to balance biocompatibility, mechanical performance, and ease of use. Taken together, these trends are accelerating adoption of tailored solutions in both reconstructive and cosmetic contexts, creating new entry points for collaboration among clinicians, engineers, and distributors.
Definitive overview of the transformative technological, clinical, and regulatory shifts redefining product development and clinical adoption in facial implants
The landscape for facial implants is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology, regulatory emphasis, and patient-centric care models. Emerging additive manufacturing techniques allow for patient-specific geometries that reduce operative time and enhance anatomical conformity, while concurrently enabling iterative design cycles that respond to surgeon feedback more rapidly than traditional manufacturing methods. At the same time, the regulatory environment is becoming more outcomes-focused, prompting developers to invest in robust clinical evidence and post-market surveillance to sustain product adoption.
Concurrently, the rise of minimally invasive approaches and scar-minimizing techniques is changing perioperative expectations, placing a premium on implant profiles that integrate seamlessly with soft tissue dynamics. Economic pressures and the need for streamlined procurement are encouraging healthcare providers to favor partners who can demonstrate supply chain transparency and scalability. As a result, companies that combine materials science excellence, digital capability, and clear clinical value propositions are best positioned to convert these transformative shifts into durable competitive advantage.
In-depth analysis of how 2025 U.S. tariff changes are reshaping supply chains, procurement strategies, and competitive positioning across the facial implant value chain
Tariff adjustments affecting trade flows in 2025 have introduced new headwinds and strategic considerations for stakeholders across the facial implant ecosystem. Elevated import duties and broader trade policy shifts create immediate cost pressure for manufacturers dependent on cross-border sourcing of raw polymers, advanced ceramics, and precision machinery. As supply chain expenses increase, companies face choices about absorbing costs, passing them to buyers, or redesigning procurement strategies to preserve margin without compromising clinical performance.
In response, many organizations are accelerating supplier diversification and nearshoring initiatives to reduce exposure to single-country dependencies. This trend is complemented by intensifying collaboration with contract manufacturers that can localize production of critical implant components while maintaining quality systems aligned with international regulatory frameworks. Moreover, purchasers and clinical networks are reassessing vendor agreements to include contingencies for tariff volatility, emphasizing contract flexibility and inventory optimization. Taken together, these adjustments illustrate how trade policy can catalyze structural supply chain resilience, influence pricing dynamics, and redefine competitive positioning across the industry.
Strategic segmentation insights highlighting how biomaterial choices, clinical applications, end-user requirements, and distribution models collectively drive product and commercial priorities
Material selection remains foundational to product differentiation in facial implants, with distinct trade-offs between mechanical behavior, biocompatibility, and surgical handling. Hydroxyapatite offers osteoconductive properties favored in bone-integrative reconstructions, while polyetheretherketone provides a favorable strength-to-weight ratio and radiolucency preferred in load-bearing or imaging-sensitive applications. Porous polyethylene delivers soft-tissue integration and contouring ease that surgeons value in select reconstructive cases, and silicone retains a long-standing role where malleability and predictable aesthetic shaping are prioritized.
Application-driven segmentation highlights clinical pathways where implant design must align with anatomical and functional objectives. Cheek reconstruction demands volumetric support and soft tissue conformity, whereas chin augmentation focuses on stable projection and load distribution. Nasal contouring and orbital reconstruction impose unique geometric and tissue-interface requirements that favor specialized materials and fixation systems. Future innovations, particularly customized 3D printing and minimally invasive techniques, are converging to enable implants that are both patient-specific and compatible with less invasive delivery methods, creating opportunities for faster recovery and improved cosmetic outcomes.
End-user dynamics influence product packaging, training needs, and service models. Aesthetic clinics and day clinics emphasize streamlined implant systems that facilitate outpatient procedures and fast turnover, while med spas-whether chain or independent-are increasingly involved in preprocedural consultations and adjunctive aesthetic care. Ambulatory surgical centers prioritize sterilization workflows and inventory predictability, and hospitals-both government and private-require demonstrable clinical evidence and integration with electronic health systems. Distribution strategies reflect these end-user nuances, with direct sales supporting clinical education and account management, distributors enabling broad geographic reach, and online channels through company websites and third-party e-commerce facilitating access for repeat purchases or smaller-volume buyers.
Critical regional intelligence describing how distinct regulatory, clinical, and commercial conditions across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape strategic priorities
Regional dynamics exert significant influence on product development priorities, regulatory strategy, and commercial channels for facial implants. The Americas present diverse payer landscapes and high procedural volumes that favor innovations demonstrating clinical differentiation and clear value in outpatient settings. In this region, demand for customizable implants and integrated surgical planning is rising, and providers increasingly seek partnerships that support training and rapid product replenishment.
Europe, the Middle East & Africa exhibit heterogeneous regulatory frameworks and procurement practices, which require adaptable market entry strategies. In mature European markets, clinical evidence and compliance with stringent device regulations are critical to adoption, whereas markets across the Middle East and Africa may prioritize cost-effective solutions and partnerships that build local clinical capacity. Asia-Pacific shows rapid uptake of aesthetic procedures alongside investment in domestic manufacturing capabilities, which amplifies competition but also drives innovation in cost-efficient materials and scalable production techniques. Across regions, success depends on tailoring product portfolios, distribution approaches, and clinical engagement models to local regulatory expectations and care delivery settings.
Actionable company-level intelligence revealing how innovation, partnerships, and commercialization capabilities determine leadership and disruption potential in the facial implant sector
Competitive dynamics in the facial implant landscape are defined by a mix of established medical device manufacturers, specialized reconstructive product developers, and emerging technology firms advancing additive manufacturing and digital surgical planning. Leading organizations invest in translational research to validate biomaterials, enhance sterilization and packaging, and ensure compatibility with imaging modalities, positioning their portfolios to meet both reconstructive and aesthetic indications. At the same time, agile challengers focus on narrow clinical niches or novel delivery mechanisms, using focused clinical partnerships to generate adoption momentum.
Commercial strategies increasingly emphasize integrated service offerings that combine product supply with surgeon training, digital planning tools, and post-market clinical support. Strategic collaborations between implant developers and contract manufacturers enable scalable production while preserving proprietary design elements. Mergers, acquisitions, and targeted investments are concentrating technological capabilities around firms that can demonstrate a pathway from R&D to regulatory approval and clinical integration. Ultimately, companies that balance technical excellence with robust commercialization infrastructure and clinician-centric support are most likely to secure preferential positioning with high-volume surgical centers and progressive aesthetic practices.
Practical, high-impact recommendations for manufacturers and providers to strengthen innovation pipelines, supply chains, clinician adoption, and commercial execution in facial implants
Industry leaders should prioritize an integrated approach that aligns product innovation with supply chain resilience and clinician engagement to achieve sustainable growth. First, invest in modular design and validated biomaterials that allow rapid customization while streamlining regulatory submissions and manufacturing workflows. Second, diversify sourcing and consider regional manufacturing partnerships to mitigate tariff exposure and reduce lead times for key markets, thereby preserving competitive pricing and service reliability.
Third, enhance commercial differentiation by offering surgeon-focused digital planning tools and structured training programs that reduce the learning curve for new implant technologies. Fourth, formalize value-based evidence generation through registries and post-market studies that address payer concerns and accelerate hospital adoption. Fifth, develop flexible distribution models that blend direct clinical support for high-touch accounts with distributor partnerships and e-commerce options to reach smaller-volume buyers. By executing these steps in parallel, leaders can increase agility, deepen clinical trust, and position their organizations to capture opportunities presented by technological and regulatory change.
Transparent explanation of the multi-layered research methodology combining clinical interviews, literature triangulation, supply chain mapping, and expert validation to ensure robust insight generation
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined primary stakeholder engagement, clinical literature review, and supply chain mapping to produce a validated assessment of industry dynamics. Primary engagement included in-depth interviews with practicing surgeons, procurement officers, regulatory experts, and manufacturing partners to capture real-world insights on material performance, procedural preferences, and commercial constraints. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with peer-reviewed clinical studies and device safety literature to ensure the analysis reflected current evidence on outcomes and complications.
Supply chain mapping identified critical nodes for raw materials, precision tooling, and sterilization services, and scenario analysis was used to explore the implications of trade policy shifts. Validation workshops with independent clinical advisors and industry specialists were conducted to refine assumptions and highlight practical considerations for adoption. Limitations of the methodology include variability in regional regulatory timelines and the evolving nature of additive manufacturing standards, which require ongoing monitoring. Overall, the approach balances depth of clinical insight with practical commercial analysis to support strategic decision-making.
Concise conclusion synthesizing how biomaterials advances, procedural innovation, and strategic commercial adaptation will determine long-term success in the facial implant arena
In summary, the facial implant sector is at a pivotal moment defined by converging technological, clinical, and commercial forces. Advances in biomaterials, customizable manufacturing, and minimally invasive delivery are expanding the possibilities for improved patient outcomes, while trade policy and regional regulatory variation are reshaping supply chain and market entry considerations. Stakeholders who align material innovation with rigorous clinical evidence and resilient procurement strategies will be best placed to meet rising procedural expectations and to scale responsibly across diverse care settings.
Looking ahead, success will depend on cross-functional collaboration between surgeons, materials scientists, and commercial teams to translate technical advantages into tangible clinical benefits. Organizations that proactively invest in clinician education, localized manufacturing flexibility, and evidence generation will not only respond to immediate headwinds but also create durable advantages in a market increasingly defined by customization, quality, and service excellence.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
193 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Surge in personalized 3D-printed facial implants using patient-specific imaging technology
- 5.2. Rising adoption of biocompatible PEEK and silicone materials in facial implant design
- 5.3. Integration of AI-driven morphologic analysis for custom facial implant planning and outcomes
- 5.4. Growing consumer demand for ethnically tailored cheek and jaw implants reflecting diverse aesthetic preferences
- 5.5. Advances in minimally invasive endoscopic techniques for placement of complex facial prosthetic implants
- 5.6. Regulatory landscape evolution impacting approval timelines for next-generation facial implant materials
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Facial Implant Market, by Material
- 8.1. Hydroxyapatite
- 8.2. Polyetheretherketone
- 8.3. Porous Polyethylene
- 8.4. Silicone
- 9. Facial Implant Market, by Application
- 9.1. Cheek Reconstruction
- 9.2. Chin Augmentation
- 9.3. Future Innovations
- 9.3.1. Customized 3D Printing
- 9.3.2. Minimally Invasive Techniques
- 9.4. Nasal Contouring
- 9.5. Orbital Reconstruction
- 10. Facial Implant Market, by End User
- 10.1. Aesthetic Clinics
- 10.1.1. Day Clinics
- 10.1.2. Med Spas
- 10.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
- 10.3. Hospitals
- 10.3.1. Government Hospitals
- 10.3.2. Private Hospitals
- 11. Facial Implant Market, by Distribution Channel
- 11.1. Online Channels
- 11.1.1. Company Websites
- 11.1.2. eCommerce Websites
- 11.2. Offline
- 12. Facial Implant Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Facial Implant Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Facial Implant Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. 3M Company
- 15.3.2. AbbVie Inc.
- 15.3.3. B. Braun Melsungen AG
- 15.3.4. BioHorizons Implant Systems Inc.
- 15.3.5. Calavera Surgical Design
- 15.3.6. Dentsply Sirona Inc.
- 15.3.7. GC Aesthetics PLC
- 15.3.8. Hanson Medical Inc.
- 15.3.9. Henry Schein, Inc.
- 15.3.10. Implantech Associates Inc.
- 15.3.11. Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
- 15.3.12. Johnson & Johnson
- 15.3.13. KLS Martin Group
- 15.3.14. Matrix Surgical USA
- 15.3.15. Medartis AG
- 15.3.16. Medtronic plc
- 15.3.17. Nobel Biocare Holding AG
- 15.3.18. Osstem Implant Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.19. OsteoMed L.P.
- 15.3.20. POLYTECH Health & Aesthetics GmbH
- 15.3.21. RTI Surgical Holdings, Inc.
- 15.3.22. Sientra Inc.
- 15.3.23. Stryker Corporation
- 15.3.24. Surgiform Technologies LLC
- 15.3.25. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
