Exposure Management Market by Component Type (Services, Solutions), Risk Type (Asset Exposure, Threat Exposure, Vulnerability Exposure), Deployment Model, Organization Size, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Exposure Management Market was valued at USD 2.81 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 3.32 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 18.42%, reaching USD 10.90 billion by 2032.
A strategic framing of exposure management as an enterprise capability that integrates discovery, context, prioritization, and governance to enable resilient operations
Exposure management is now a core enterprise capability that bridges security, risk, and business resilience. Organizations are moving beyond siloed vulnerability scans and toward an integrated understanding of how assets, threats, and vulnerabilities interact across complex technology stacks and supply chains. This introduction frames exposure management as a strategic function that informs investment prioritization, operational controls, and regulatory compliance.
In practice, exposure management combines continuous discovery, contextual risk scoring, and prioritized remediation to reduce the likelihood and impact of disruptive events. Leaders must evaluate not only technical gaps but also procedural and governance factors that influence the speed and effectiveness of mitigation. As enterprises adopt hybrid infrastructures and distributed development practices, the need for unified discovery and actionable risk indicators becomes critical to maintain business continuity.
Consequently, exposure management programs must be adaptable, technology-agnostic, and aligned with business objectives. Successful implementations emphasize cross-functional accountability, metrics that resonate with executives, and processes that enable rapid decision-making. This introduction sets the stage for the report’s deeper analysis, highlighting the imperative to transform exposure data into prioritized action that supports resilience and sustained operational performance.
How evolving attack surfaces, cloud-native architectures, and heightened regulatory expectations are reshaping exposure management practices and priorities
The landscape of exposure management is undergoing transformative shifts driven by changes in attack surfaces, technological architectures, and regulatory expectations. Cloud-native adoption, the proliferation of distributed workforces, and the increased interdependence of third-party services have expanded asset perimeters and created new vectors of exposure. As a result, detection and response capabilities must evolve from isolated point solutions to cohesive platforms that provide continuous visibility and contextual prioritization.
Simultaneously, threat actor sophistication has increased, combining automated tooling with targeted social engineering and supply chain exploitation. This trend compels organizations to prioritize exposure remediation that materially reduces attacker opportunities rather than only achieving compliance checkboxes. Furthermore, regulatory scrutiny is intensifying in many jurisdictions, emphasizing demonstrable risk management practices and lifecycle accountability for critical systems.
Taken together, these shifts necessitate a reorientation toward proactive exposure reduction. Organizations must invest in integrations that connect discovery, asset intelligence, and remediation workflows, while also enhancing governance to ensure consistent policy enforcement. This section examines how these forces create both challenges and opportunities for leaders seeking to modernize their exposure management posture.
Understanding the indirect security consequences of tariff-driven supply chain shifts and procurement dynamics on enterprise exposure and resilience
Tariff changes and trade policy shifts can have indirect but material effects on exposure management programs by altering supply chain dynamics, procurement timelines, and vendor relationships. When tariffs introduce cost volatility or source diversification, organizations often accelerate supplier changes, leading to rapid onboarding of new platforms, devices, or services that may not be fully inventoried or secured. These changes can widen the exposure surface and introduce compatibility or configuration gaps that adversaries can exploit.
Moreover, extended lead times and supply disruptions can delay hardware refresh cycles and security appliance replacements, increasing the operational risk associated with legacy devices that lack modern protections. Procurement-driven shifts also influence software licensing and service-level agreements, which can affect visibility into third-party hosted assets and complicate contractual assurances for security posture.
Consequently, organizations must incorporate trade policy impacts into their exposure risk assessments, emphasizing supplier validation, accelerated discovery of newly introduced assets, and conditional acceptance criteria for outsourced services. By proactively addressing procurement-induced exposure, leaders can mitigate the unintended security consequences of geopolitical or tariff-driven supply chain reconfiguration.
Segment-driven exposure patterns that reveal how component, deployment, size, risk, and vertical distinctions change priorities for discovery and remediation
Segment-level analysis reveals differentiated exposure profiles across component type, deployment model, organization size, risk type, and vertical that inform targeted program design. When considering component type, exposure management must address both Services and Solutions, with Services requiring distinct operational approaches for Managed engagements versus Professional services, and Solutions demanding tailored controls across Application-level assets and Platform-level infrastructure. This distinction affects discovery priorities, contractual obligations, and the expected remediation tempo.
Deployment model further stratifies needs: Cloud, Hybrid, and On Premise environments each present unique visibility and control constraints, and within cloud environments the differences between Private Cloud and Public Cloud architectures shape identity, network segmentation, and telemetry availability. Organization size is another critical dimension, with Large Enterprises typically possessing more complex legacy estates and procurement processes, while Small and Medium Enterprises often face resource constraints that favor managed services and simplified tooling.
Risk type segmentation highlights the need to differentiate between Asset Exposure, Threat Exposure, and Vulnerability Exposure, as each requires distinct detection methods, scoring criteria, and remediation pathways. Vertical considerations across Banking Financial Services Insurance, Government, Healthcare, and IT Telecommunication influence compliance obligations, tolerance for downtime, and the sensitivity of processed data. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables program leaders to prioritize controls that yield the greatest reduction in organizational risk given constraints in budget and personnel.
Regional risk dynamics and operational considerations that demand tailored exposure strategies reflecting regulatory, threat, and infrastructure differences across global markets
Regional dynamics play a strong role in shaping exposure management priorities, driven by regulatory regimes, threat ecosystems, and infrastructure footprints. In the Americas, organizations often contend with a mix of sophisticated enterprise environments and active threat actor activity, driving a focus on integration between asset discovery and incident response. Meanwhile, in Europe, Middle East & Africa regulatory complexity and data residency requirements emphasize demonstrable governance and controls that align with cross-border compliance obligations.
In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid digital transformation and large-scale cloud adoption create a high pace of change that challenges discovery and lifecycle management, while also presenting opportunities for cloud-native exposure management capabilities. Each region’s vendor ecosystems, talent availability, and typical deployment architectures influence the selection of tools and the expected service delivery models. Transitioning from regional assessment to operational planning requires tailoring pilot programs and governance frameworks to regional constraints and strengths.
Therefore, an effective global exposure management strategy balances centralized policy frameworks with region-specific controls and operational models, ensuring that local compliance, threat dynamics, and infrastructure realities are reflected in tooling, processes, and escalation pathways.
Why vendor interoperability, managed outcomes, and integration-first delivery models are critical determinants when selecting exposure management partners
Competitive and innovation dynamics among vendors and service providers influence the capabilities available to buyers and the practical approaches to program implementation. Leading providers increasingly emphasize platform interoperability, automated discovery, and orchestration of remediation workflows to reduce time-to-action and to minimize manual dependency. At the same time, managed service offerings have matured to include continuous monitoring, context-aware alerting, and outcome-based service levels that are attractive to organizations with constrained internal resources.
Partnership models between technology suppliers and system integrators are also shaping how exposure management solutions are deployed at scale, particularly for complex hybrid environments. Buyers should evaluate vendors based on their ability to demonstrate integration with existing security stacks, depth of telemetry ingestion, and the practical effectiveness of prioritization algorithms under real-world conditions. Additionally, provider roadmaps that clearly articulate enhancements in automation, threat intelligence integration, and remediation orchestration are important for long-term alignment.
Ultimately, procurement decisions should weigh tooling capabilities alongside service delivery, professional expertise, and the ability to provide transparent metrics that translate technical findings into executive-level risk narratives. This approach ensures that technology selection supports sustainable operational improvement rather than transient tactical gains.
Practical executive actions to convert exposure visibility into measurable risk reduction through governance, integration, automation, and procurement controls
Industry leaders must move from awareness to decisive execution to reduce exposure in measurable and sustainable ways. First, align exposure management objectives with business risk appetite and operational priorities, ensuring that executive sponsorship is paired with clear owner accountability for remediation outcomes. Next, invest in integrations that connect discovery tools with identity, configuration, and deployment metadata to enable contextual prioritization rather than siloed alerting.
Leaders should also adopt phased delivery models that combine platform adoption with managed services to accelerate capability while developing internal skills. Emphasize playbooks and automation that translate prioritized findings into repeatable remediation workflows, and establish metrics that measure time-to-contain and risk reduction rather than raw scan counts. To address supplier-induced exposure, strengthen procurement controls by embedding security criteria into vendor selection and onboarding processes, and require attestation of security baselines for critical third parties.
Finally, maintain continuous improvement through periodic red-teaming, tabletop exercises, and post-incident reviews that feed back into discovery and prioritization logic. By implementing these actions, leaders can convert exposure visibility into sustained operational resilience and ensure that investments yield measurable reductions in enterprise risk.
A multi-method research approach combining practitioner interviews, vendor capability assessments, and contextual analysis to derive actionable exposure management insights
This research leverages a multi-method approach to produce a robust analysis of exposure management practices, synthesizing primary interviews, vendor capability assessments, and secondary literature to develop actionable insights. Primary research comprised structured interviews with security leaders, practitioners, and service providers across diverse industries to capture operational realities, tool adoption patterns, and governance models. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with vendor documentation and technical whitepapers to validate capability claims and identify common integration patterns.
To ensure relevance, the research incorporated comparative analysis across deployment environments and organizational sizes, identifying how discovery challenges and remediation workflows differ in cloud-native, hybrid, and on-premise contexts. The methodology prioritized evidence-based evaluation of automation maturity, telemetry coverage, and remediation orchestration. Findings were peer-reviewed by domain experts to refine conclusions and to surface practical recommendations for procurement, operations, and executive governance.
Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on contextualized insight rather than theoretical constructs, ensuring that the conclusions and recommendations reflect implementable practices that address current threat dynamics and operational constraints.
Concluding synthesis that reinforces exposure management as a continuous strategic discipline essential for resilience, compliance, and confident digital transformation
In conclusion, exposure management must be treated as an ongoing strategic discipline that integrates discovery, contextual prioritization, and automated remediation to reduce enterprise risk. The interplay of evolving attack techniques, cloud transformation, and supply chain dynamics requires that organizations move beyond periodic assessments and toward continuous, outcomes-focused programs. Effective exposure management relies on well-defined governance, interoperable tooling, and pragmatic procurement practices that prevent rapid introduction of unmanaged assets.
Leaders who adopt a segmented approach-considering component, deployment, organizational size, risk type, and vertical-will be better positioned to allocate resources where they yield the greatest reduction in exposure. Regional considerations and vendor selection dynamics further shape the operational model and the pace at which capabilities can be scaled. By following the actionable recommendations in this report, organizations can convert technical visibility into prioritized action, demonstrating resilience to stakeholders and regulators.
The broader imperative is clear: exposure management is no longer optional. It is a foundational capability that supports business continuity, protects brand integrity, and enables confident digital transformation in the face of persistent and evolving threats.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic framing of exposure management as an enterprise capability that integrates discovery, context, prioritization, and governance to enable resilient operations
Exposure management is now a core enterprise capability that bridges security, risk, and business resilience. Organizations are moving beyond siloed vulnerability scans and toward an integrated understanding of how assets, threats, and vulnerabilities interact across complex technology stacks and supply chains. This introduction frames exposure management as a strategic function that informs investment prioritization, operational controls, and regulatory compliance.
In practice, exposure management combines continuous discovery, contextual risk scoring, and prioritized remediation to reduce the likelihood and impact of disruptive events. Leaders must evaluate not only technical gaps but also procedural and governance factors that influence the speed and effectiveness of mitigation. As enterprises adopt hybrid infrastructures and distributed development practices, the need for unified discovery and actionable risk indicators becomes critical to maintain business continuity.
Consequently, exposure management programs must be adaptable, technology-agnostic, and aligned with business objectives. Successful implementations emphasize cross-functional accountability, metrics that resonate with executives, and processes that enable rapid decision-making. This introduction sets the stage for the report’s deeper analysis, highlighting the imperative to transform exposure data into prioritized action that supports resilience and sustained operational performance.
How evolving attack surfaces, cloud-native architectures, and heightened regulatory expectations are reshaping exposure management practices and priorities
The landscape of exposure management is undergoing transformative shifts driven by changes in attack surfaces, technological architectures, and regulatory expectations. Cloud-native adoption, the proliferation of distributed workforces, and the increased interdependence of third-party services have expanded asset perimeters and created new vectors of exposure. As a result, detection and response capabilities must evolve from isolated point solutions to cohesive platforms that provide continuous visibility and contextual prioritization.
Simultaneously, threat actor sophistication has increased, combining automated tooling with targeted social engineering and supply chain exploitation. This trend compels organizations to prioritize exposure remediation that materially reduces attacker opportunities rather than only achieving compliance checkboxes. Furthermore, regulatory scrutiny is intensifying in many jurisdictions, emphasizing demonstrable risk management practices and lifecycle accountability for critical systems.
Taken together, these shifts necessitate a reorientation toward proactive exposure reduction. Organizations must invest in integrations that connect discovery, asset intelligence, and remediation workflows, while also enhancing governance to ensure consistent policy enforcement. This section examines how these forces create both challenges and opportunities for leaders seeking to modernize their exposure management posture.
Understanding the indirect security consequences of tariff-driven supply chain shifts and procurement dynamics on enterprise exposure and resilience
Tariff changes and trade policy shifts can have indirect but material effects on exposure management programs by altering supply chain dynamics, procurement timelines, and vendor relationships. When tariffs introduce cost volatility or source diversification, organizations often accelerate supplier changes, leading to rapid onboarding of new platforms, devices, or services that may not be fully inventoried or secured. These changes can widen the exposure surface and introduce compatibility or configuration gaps that adversaries can exploit.
Moreover, extended lead times and supply disruptions can delay hardware refresh cycles and security appliance replacements, increasing the operational risk associated with legacy devices that lack modern protections. Procurement-driven shifts also influence software licensing and service-level agreements, which can affect visibility into third-party hosted assets and complicate contractual assurances for security posture.
Consequently, organizations must incorporate trade policy impacts into their exposure risk assessments, emphasizing supplier validation, accelerated discovery of newly introduced assets, and conditional acceptance criteria for outsourced services. By proactively addressing procurement-induced exposure, leaders can mitigate the unintended security consequences of geopolitical or tariff-driven supply chain reconfiguration.
Segment-driven exposure patterns that reveal how component, deployment, size, risk, and vertical distinctions change priorities for discovery and remediation
Segment-level analysis reveals differentiated exposure profiles across component type, deployment model, organization size, risk type, and vertical that inform targeted program design. When considering component type, exposure management must address both Services and Solutions, with Services requiring distinct operational approaches for Managed engagements versus Professional services, and Solutions demanding tailored controls across Application-level assets and Platform-level infrastructure. This distinction affects discovery priorities, contractual obligations, and the expected remediation tempo.
Deployment model further stratifies needs: Cloud, Hybrid, and On Premise environments each present unique visibility and control constraints, and within cloud environments the differences between Private Cloud and Public Cloud architectures shape identity, network segmentation, and telemetry availability. Organization size is another critical dimension, with Large Enterprises typically possessing more complex legacy estates and procurement processes, while Small and Medium Enterprises often face resource constraints that favor managed services and simplified tooling.
Risk type segmentation highlights the need to differentiate between Asset Exposure, Threat Exposure, and Vulnerability Exposure, as each requires distinct detection methods, scoring criteria, and remediation pathways. Vertical considerations across Banking Financial Services Insurance, Government, Healthcare, and IT Telecommunication influence compliance obligations, tolerance for downtime, and the sensitivity of processed data. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables program leaders to prioritize controls that yield the greatest reduction in organizational risk given constraints in budget and personnel.
Regional risk dynamics and operational considerations that demand tailored exposure strategies reflecting regulatory, threat, and infrastructure differences across global markets
Regional dynamics play a strong role in shaping exposure management priorities, driven by regulatory regimes, threat ecosystems, and infrastructure footprints. In the Americas, organizations often contend with a mix of sophisticated enterprise environments and active threat actor activity, driving a focus on integration between asset discovery and incident response. Meanwhile, in Europe, Middle East & Africa regulatory complexity and data residency requirements emphasize demonstrable governance and controls that align with cross-border compliance obligations.
In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid digital transformation and large-scale cloud adoption create a high pace of change that challenges discovery and lifecycle management, while also presenting opportunities for cloud-native exposure management capabilities. Each region’s vendor ecosystems, talent availability, and typical deployment architectures influence the selection of tools and the expected service delivery models. Transitioning from regional assessment to operational planning requires tailoring pilot programs and governance frameworks to regional constraints and strengths.
Therefore, an effective global exposure management strategy balances centralized policy frameworks with region-specific controls and operational models, ensuring that local compliance, threat dynamics, and infrastructure realities are reflected in tooling, processes, and escalation pathways.
Why vendor interoperability, managed outcomes, and integration-first delivery models are critical determinants when selecting exposure management partners
Competitive and innovation dynamics among vendors and service providers influence the capabilities available to buyers and the practical approaches to program implementation. Leading providers increasingly emphasize platform interoperability, automated discovery, and orchestration of remediation workflows to reduce time-to-action and to minimize manual dependency. At the same time, managed service offerings have matured to include continuous monitoring, context-aware alerting, and outcome-based service levels that are attractive to organizations with constrained internal resources.
Partnership models between technology suppliers and system integrators are also shaping how exposure management solutions are deployed at scale, particularly for complex hybrid environments. Buyers should evaluate vendors based on their ability to demonstrate integration with existing security stacks, depth of telemetry ingestion, and the practical effectiveness of prioritization algorithms under real-world conditions. Additionally, provider roadmaps that clearly articulate enhancements in automation, threat intelligence integration, and remediation orchestration are important for long-term alignment.
Ultimately, procurement decisions should weigh tooling capabilities alongside service delivery, professional expertise, and the ability to provide transparent metrics that translate technical findings into executive-level risk narratives. This approach ensures that technology selection supports sustainable operational improvement rather than transient tactical gains.
Practical executive actions to convert exposure visibility into measurable risk reduction through governance, integration, automation, and procurement controls
Industry leaders must move from awareness to decisive execution to reduce exposure in measurable and sustainable ways. First, align exposure management objectives with business risk appetite and operational priorities, ensuring that executive sponsorship is paired with clear owner accountability for remediation outcomes. Next, invest in integrations that connect discovery tools with identity, configuration, and deployment metadata to enable contextual prioritization rather than siloed alerting.
Leaders should also adopt phased delivery models that combine platform adoption with managed services to accelerate capability while developing internal skills. Emphasize playbooks and automation that translate prioritized findings into repeatable remediation workflows, and establish metrics that measure time-to-contain and risk reduction rather than raw scan counts. To address supplier-induced exposure, strengthen procurement controls by embedding security criteria into vendor selection and onboarding processes, and require attestation of security baselines for critical third parties.
Finally, maintain continuous improvement through periodic red-teaming, tabletop exercises, and post-incident reviews that feed back into discovery and prioritization logic. By implementing these actions, leaders can convert exposure visibility into sustained operational resilience and ensure that investments yield measurable reductions in enterprise risk.
A multi-method research approach combining practitioner interviews, vendor capability assessments, and contextual analysis to derive actionable exposure management insights
This research leverages a multi-method approach to produce a robust analysis of exposure management practices, synthesizing primary interviews, vendor capability assessments, and secondary literature to develop actionable insights. Primary research comprised structured interviews with security leaders, practitioners, and service providers across diverse industries to capture operational realities, tool adoption patterns, and governance models. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with vendor documentation and technical whitepapers to validate capability claims and identify common integration patterns.
To ensure relevance, the research incorporated comparative analysis across deployment environments and organizational sizes, identifying how discovery challenges and remediation workflows differ in cloud-native, hybrid, and on-premise contexts. The methodology prioritized evidence-based evaluation of automation maturity, telemetry coverage, and remediation orchestration. Findings were peer-reviewed by domain experts to refine conclusions and to surface practical recommendations for procurement, operations, and executive governance.
Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on contextualized insight rather than theoretical constructs, ensuring that the conclusions and recommendations reflect implementable practices that address current threat dynamics and operational constraints.
Concluding synthesis that reinforces exposure management as a continuous strategic discipline essential for resilience, compliance, and confident digital transformation
In conclusion, exposure management must be treated as an ongoing strategic discipline that integrates discovery, contextual prioritization, and automated remediation to reduce enterprise risk. The interplay of evolving attack techniques, cloud transformation, and supply chain dynamics requires that organizations move beyond periodic assessments and toward continuous, outcomes-focused programs. Effective exposure management relies on well-defined governance, interoperable tooling, and pragmatic procurement practices that prevent rapid introduction of unmanaged assets.
Leaders who adopt a segmented approach-considering component, deployment, organizational size, risk type, and vertical-will be better positioned to allocate resources where they yield the greatest reduction in exposure. Regional considerations and vendor selection dynamics further shape the operational model and the pace at which capabilities can be scaled. By following the actionable recommendations in this report, organizations can convert technical visibility into prioritized action, demonstrating resilience to stakeholders and regulators.
The broader imperative is clear: exposure management is no longer optional. It is a foundational capability that supports business continuity, protects brand integrity, and enables confident digital transformation in the face of persistent and evolving threats.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate real-time risk exposure monitoring across cloud and on premise systems
- 5.2. Adoption of zero trust network architectures to enhance granular access control and minimize exposure risk in distributed environments
- 5.3. Development of standardized risk quantification metrics for enterprise exposure management to drive data driven decision making
- 5.4. Consolidation of exposure management platforms with cloud security posture management for unified visibility and compliance assurance
- 5.5. Incorporation of predictive analytics into exposure management workflows to proactively identify and remediate emerging vulnerabilities
- 5.6. Emphasis on third party and supply chain exposure assessment using continuous monitoring and automated vendor risk scoring
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Exposure Management Market, by Component Type
- 8.1. Services
- 8.1.1. Managed
- 8.1.2. Professional
- 8.2. Solutions
- 8.2.1. Application
- 8.2.2. Platform
- 9. Exposure Management Market, by Risk Type
- 9.1. Asset Exposure
- 9.2. Threat Exposure
- 9.3. Vulnerability Exposure
- 10. Exposure Management Market, by Deployment Model
- 10.1. Cloud
- 10.1.1. Private Cloud
- 10.1.2. Public Cloud
- 10.2. Hybrid
- 10.3. On Premise
- 11. Exposure Management Market, by Organization Size
- 11.1. Large Enterprises
- 11.2. Small And Medium Enterprises
- 12. Exposure Management Market, by End User
- 12.1. Banking Financial Services Insurance
- 12.2. Government
- 12.3. Healthcare
- 12.4. IT Telecommunication
- 13. Exposure Management Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Exposure Management Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Exposure Management Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Adarma
- 16.3.2. Anomali Inc.
- 16.3.3. AppAcuity, Inc.
- 16.3.4. At-Bay, Inc.
- 16.3.5. Atos SE
- 16.3.6. Attaxion, LLC
- 16.3.7. BitSight Technologies, Inc.
- 16.3.8. Censys, Inc.
- 16.3.9. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
- 16.3.10. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 16.3.11. CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc
- 16.3.12. Cymulate Ltd.
- 16.3.13. Cymulate Ltd.
- 16.3.14. Forescout Technologies, Inc.
- 16.3.15. Google LLC by Alphabet Inc.
- 16.3.16. International Business Machines Corporation
- 16.3.17. Microsoft Corporation
- 16.3.18. Picus Security Inc.
- 16.3.19. Rapid7, Inc.
- 16.3.20. Ridge Security, Inc.
- 16.3.21. Risk Management Solutions, Inc.
- 16.3.22. SAP SE
- 16.3.23. Skybox Security, Inc.
- 16.3.24. Tenable, Inc.
- 16.3.25. VIAVI Solutions Inc.
- 16.3.26. Vulcan Cyber Ltd.
- 16.3.27. XM Cyber Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
