Event Management as a Service Market by Type (Analytics & Reporting, Attendee Engagement & Networking, Event Marketing & Promotion), Event Format (Hybrid Events, Physical Events, Virtual Events), Service Type, Deployment Model, End User, Industry Vertical
Description
The Event Management as a Service Market was valued at USD 5.31 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 5.85 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 10.31%, reaching USD 11.67 billion by 2032.
A clear framing of event management as a strategic managed service that integrates technology, operations, and outcomes to support enterprise experience goals
Event management delivered as a managed service has transitioned from a niche operational support offering to a strategic capability that drives brand experiences, operational resilience, and measurable business outcomes. This introduction positions event management as a business-critical service set that combines technology platforms, professional services, and operational networks to orchestrate complex live, virtual, and hybrid experiences. It highlights how the convergence of digital collaboration tools, data-driven audience engagement, and integrated logistics has redefined expectations for speed, reliability, and return on investment across industries.
As organisations shift from episodic event planning toward continuous experience strategies, decision-makers now prioritise repeatable processes, vendor ecosystems that provide end-to-end delivery, and platforms that enable rapid iteration. This evolution demands new procurement frameworks, deeper alignment between marketing and procurement functions, and an emphasis on outcomes such as attendee engagement, lead quality, and operational efficiency. Understanding this context is crucial because it frames the tactical choices buyers make about technology selection, service models, and partner relationships.
Consequently, providers are being evaluated on their ability to supply integrated workflows, demonstrate privacy‑aware data practices, and deliver consistent experiences across geographic and format boundaries. This introduction establishes the baseline for the remainder of the analysis by clarifying the role of event management as a service in supporting strategic goals while enabling scalable execution across multiple touchpoints and stakeholder groups.
How rapid technology advances, hybrid expectations, and operational resilience are reshaping event delivery models and buyer selection criteria
The landscape for event management services is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology, buyer expectations, and operational complexity. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are enhancing personalization and real-time decisioning, enabling systems to recommend content sequences, predict session attendance, and optimise networking suggestions. At the same time, the rise of hybrid formats has forced a rethink of production standards, requiring parity of experience between physical and virtual attendees and raising the bar for audio‑visual, interaction design, and moderation practices.
Buyers now expect modularity: they want components that can be assembled quickly to meet campaign tempos yet governed by consistent KPIs and data schemas. This has encouraged the proliferation of API-first platforms and ecosystem playbooks that allow third-party tools for registration, engagement, analytics, and venue logistics to interoperate. Privacy regulations and data residency requirements have compelled providers to embed compliance capabilities into their deployments, with clear controls over consented data capture and retention.
Operationally, supply chain resilience and local fulfilment networks are becoming differentiators, especially as clients demand rapid turnarounds across multiple markets. Environmental sustainability considerations are altering event design choices and vendor selection criteria. Together, these forces are redefining vendor value propositions from single-point solutions to integrated service partners capable of delivering consistent, measurable experiences at scale.
The cumulative operational and procurement consequences of US tariffs in 2025 and the pragmatic adaptation strategies reshaping vendor sourcing and pricing dynamics
The implementation of United States tariffs in 2025 has produced cumulative effects across procurement, pricing, and operational planning within the event services ecosystem. Increased duties on imported audio‑visual equipment, staging hardware, and certain electronics have driven up capital and rental costs for physical production. As a result, event providers and corporate procurement teams have re-evaluated purchasing strategies, shifting some capital outlays toward rental agreements with local partners or prioritising software-centric solutions that reduce dependency on imported hardware.
In response, service providers accelerated diversification of supply chains by developing nearer‑shore fulfilment networks and deepening relationships with domestic manufacturers and rental houses. This transition improved lead time reliability but also raised short‑term unit costs as new vendors scaled capacity. Some buyers accepted higher pass‑through costs for premium in‑person production while others reallocated budgets toward hybrid production investments that amortise expenses across virtual audiences.
Longer term, the tariff environment catalysed innovation in lightweight modular staging and cloud-managed AV workflows that reduce the volume of imported components. It also incentivised service models that emphasise subscription and managed rental over capital ownership, enabling buyers to preserve budget flexibility in an uncertain trade environment. Through these adaptations, the sector demonstrated pragmatic mitigation strategies that balanced adherence to regulatory impacts with the need to maintain event quality and audience expectations.
A nuanced segmentation framework that connects product types, event formats, service models, deployment choices, end users, and vertical needs to actionable service design
Insightful segmentation allows providers and buyers to match capabilities to specific needs, and logical grouping by type, format, service orientation, deployment model, end user, and industry vertical reveals differentiated demand vectors. When examining offerings by type, Analytics & Reporting is recognised for its split between Post‑Event Reporting and Real‑Time Analytics, which respectively support retrospective ROI assessment and live optimisation. Attendee Engagement & Networking manifests through mechanisms such as Gamification, Networking Lounge, and Polling & Surveys, each delivering distinct behavioural levers to sustain attention and catalyse connections. Event Marketing & Promotion spans Content Marketing, Email Marketing, and Social Media Marketing, reflecting the diverse channels used to build awareness and convert registrants. Onsite Services & Management pairs Logistics Management with Staff Management to ensure physical delivery, while Registration & Ticketing differentiates between Online Registration and Onsite Registration to meet varied user journeys. Venue Sourcing & Management balances Local Venue Partners with Online Venue Aggregators to reconcile local expertise and global reach, and Virtual Event Platforms divide into Hybrid Event Platforms, Virtual Collaboration Platforms, and Webcast Platforms to support differing interaction models.
Across event formats, demand separates into Hybrid Events, Physical Events, and Virtual Events, with each format carrying distinct production, technology, and measurement requirements. Service type bifurcates into Managed Services and Professional Services, where the former emphasises outcome ownership and the latter focuses on project-based expertise. Deployment considerations fall into Cloud and On‑Premises choices, reflecting trade‑offs between scalability and control. End users range from Large Enterprises to Small & Medium Enterprises, creating variation in procurement complexity, compliance needs, and scale expectations. Industry verticals such as BFSI, Education, Government & Defense, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, IT & Telecom, Manufacturing, and Retail & E‑Commerce each impose unique regulatory, technical, and audience engagement constraints that shape solution design. By aligning product roadmaps and service packages to these segment distinctions, providers can prioritise investments in platform capabilities, localized operations, and verticalised content strategies that respond directly to buyer priorities.
How divergent regional priorities across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific demand tailored delivery models, compliance approaches, and engagement strategies
Regional dynamics shape demand, delivery models, and competitive positioning in distinct ways, creating differentiated priorities for providers operating across the globe. In the 'Americas' market, enterprise adoption is driven by large corporate events, trade shows, and conferences where buyers prioritise scale, integrated CRM and marketing automation pairing, and vendor ecosystems capable of cross‑border delivery. This region also favours advanced analytics and lead‑generation integrations that align event outcomes with sales pipelines.
Across 'Europe, Middle East & Africa', regulatory diversity and sustainability imperatives influence supplier selection and event design. Buyers increasingly expect transparent carbon reporting and localized production to meet jurisdictional requirements, and the region's heterogenous market requires providers to offer flexible fulfilment models that accommodate local regulations and supplier markets. Hybrid offerings are particularly valuable here because they allow organisations to balance in‑person presence with broader virtual reach.
Within 'Asia‑Pacific', rapid digitalisation, high mobile engagement rates, and growing investment in experience marketing have accelerated adoption of virtual collaboration and hybrid event platforms. Infrastructure variability across markets means that providers must balance cloud capabilities with edge fulfilment and local partner networks to assure performance. Moreover, cost sensitivity coexists with appetite for innovative engagement formats, creating opportunities for scalable, lower‑latency solutions that support multi‑lingual and culturally adaptive programming.
An overview of competitive patterns showing platform convergence, strategic partnerships, and capability-led differentiation shaping supplier strategies and buyer choices
Competitive dynamics in the event management services space are driven by a mix of platform innovation, service breadth, and operational reach. Leading providers differentiate through platform convergence that brings registration, engagement, analytics, and onsite operations under a single orchestration layer, while specialist firms emphasise deep vertical expertise or unique production capabilities. Strategic partnerships between technology vendors, local fulfilment networks, and creative agencies have become common as firms seek to deliver seamless attendee experiences without owning every component of the value chain.
Providers that succeed tend to excel in two dimensions: the ability to deliver consistent experience quality across formats and geographies, and the capacity to translate event interactions into measurable downstream outcomes. Investment priorities include governance and privacy features, interoperability through open APIs, and modular pricing structures that facilitate trials and phased rollouts. Talent and operational networks remain a differentiator, particularly for complex physical and hybrid productions where local knowledge and reliable staging partners determine execution risk.
At the same time, competitive pressure encourages consolidation and M&A activity as firms seek to expand their geographic footprint, add complementary capabilities, and accelerate time to market. Buyers can expect continued refinement of end‑to‑end service models, more transparent procurement terms, and an expanded menu of subscription and outcome-based commercial arrangements as companies align offerings to enterprise procurement practices.
Practical, high‑impact recommendations for enterprise leaders to build resilient, measurable, and scalable event programs that align with strategic priorities
Leaders in enterprise event strategy should pursue a set of pragmatic actions to capitalise on current trends and reduce operational risk. First, prioritise modular platform architectures and API integrations that allow rapid assembly of solutions while preserving data governance and user privacy. Second, invest in hybrid production capabilities and design templates that ensure equitable experiences for both in‑person and virtual attendees, thereby protecting brand equity across formats. Third, build or deepen local fulfilment networks to mitigate supply chain volatility and to reduce the lead times that erode campaign agility.
Additionally, organisations should develop outcome‑oriented commercial frameworks with providers, aligning incentives to attendee engagement metrics, lead conversion quality, and post‑event attribution. Emphasise sustainability by adopting measurable carbon reduction practices and vendor reporting requirements, as this will increasingly influence buyer and stakeholder perception. Talent development is also essential: combine internal program management skills with external production expertise to maintain continuity and institutional knowledge.
Finally, adopt a phased approach to advanced analytics, starting with real‑time monitoring for live optimisation and extending to post‑event attribution frameworks that feed back into program design. By executing these recommendations, leaders will be well positioned to deliver repeatable, measurable event programs that align with broader organisational objectives and deliver tangible business impact.
A transparent mixed‑methods research approach combining practitioner interviews, secondary review, triangulation, and scenario analysis to validate findings and recommendations
The research underpinning this analysis combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to produce balanced, verifiable insights. Primary inputs included structured interviews with event buyers, service providers, production partners, and technology leaders operating across multiple geographies and verticals. These interviews focused on procurement criteria, operational challenges, platform preferences, and forward‑looking priorities, ensuring the perspective of both buyers and suppliers.
Secondary research consisted of an exhaustive review of public filings, vendor product documentation, regulatory guidance, and industry thought leadership to contextualise primary findings and to identify technology and operational trends. Data triangulation methods were applied to reconcile differing viewpoints and to validate recurring themes. Additionally, scenario analysis was used to assess the operational implications of policy shifts, supply chain disruptions, and emergent technologies.
To maintain rigor, all conclusions were subjected to internal peer review and cross‑checked with practitioner feedback during validation workshops. Limitations include variability in regional disclosure practices and the rapid pace of technological innovation, which may alter supplier roadmaps. Nonetheless, the methodology emphasises transparency and traceability so readers can understand the evidence behind each recommendation and adapt them to their specific organisational context.
A concise synthesis of how strategic alignment, operational investments, and platform innovation will determine success in delivering measurable event experiences
In conclusion, event management as a service has matured into a strategic capability that combines technological sophistication, operational depth, and outcome orientation. Providers and buyers are realigning around hybrid delivery models, modular integration, and data governance practices that enable rapid experimentation while preserving consistency and compliance. The cumulative effects of trade policy shifts and supply chain pressures have accelerated moves toward rental and managed service models, and regional variation in regulatory and infrastructure conditions continues to drive differentiated go‑to‑market strategies.
The sectors most ready to capitalise on these shifts will be those that embrace modular platform architectures, invest in local fulfilment and talent networks, and adopt outcome‑oriented commercial relationships with suppliers. For buyers, the priority is to articulate clear KPIs, demand interoperability, and require transparent reporting on both engagement outcomes and sustainability metrics. For providers, the imperative is to deliver reproducible quality across geographies, to innovate in production efficiency, and to build trust through demonstrable privacy and compliance capabilities.
Taken together, these strategic adjustments will drive better event experiences, more predictable operational outcomes, and closer alignment between event investments and organisational objectives. Organisations that move decisively today will secure competitive advantage as experience marketing continues to shape customer and stakeholder relationships.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A clear framing of event management as a strategic managed service that integrates technology, operations, and outcomes to support enterprise experience goals
Event management delivered as a managed service has transitioned from a niche operational support offering to a strategic capability that drives brand experiences, operational resilience, and measurable business outcomes. This introduction positions event management as a business-critical service set that combines technology platforms, professional services, and operational networks to orchestrate complex live, virtual, and hybrid experiences. It highlights how the convergence of digital collaboration tools, data-driven audience engagement, and integrated logistics has redefined expectations for speed, reliability, and return on investment across industries.
As organisations shift from episodic event planning toward continuous experience strategies, decision-makers now prioritise repeatable processes, vendor ecosystems that provide end-to-end delivery, and platforms that enable rapid iteration. This evolution demands new procurement frameworks, deeper alignment between marketing and procurement functions, and an emphasis on outcomes such as attendee engagement, lead quality, and operational efficiency. Understanding this context is crucial because it frames the tactical choices buyers make about technology selection, service models, and partner relationships.
Consequently, providers are being evaluated on their ability to supply integrated workflows, demonstrate privacy‑aware data practices, and deliver consistent experiences across geographic and format boundaries. This introduction establishes the baseline for the remainder of the analysis by clarifying the role of event management as a service in supporting strategic goals while enabling scalable execution across multiple touchpoints and stakeholder groups.
How rapid technology advances, hybrid expectations, and operational resilience are reshaping event delivery models and buyer selection criteria
The landscape for event management services is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology, buyer expectations, and operational complexity. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are enhancing personalization and real-time decisioning, enabling systems to recommend content sequences, predict session attendance, and optimise networking suggestions. At the same time, the rise of hybrid formats has forced a rethink of production standards, requiring parity of experience between physical and virtual attendees and raising the bar for audio‑visual, interaction design, and moderation practices.
Buyers now expect modularity: they want components that can be assembled quickly to meet campaign tempos yet governed by consistent KPIs and data schemas. This has encouraged the proliferation of API-first platforms and ecosystem playbooks that allow third-party tools for registration, engagement, analytics, and venue logistics to interoperate. Privacy regulations and data residency requirements have compelled providers to embed compliance capabilities into their deployments, with clear controls over consented data capture and retention.
Operationally, supply chain resilience and local fulfilment networks are becoming differentiators, especially as clients demand rapid turnarounds across multiple markets. Environmental sustainability considerations are altering event design choices and vendor selection criteria. Together, these forces are redefining vendor value propositions from single-point solutions to integrated service partners capable of delivering consistent, measurable experiences at scale.
The cumulative operational and procurement consequences of US tariffs in 2025 and the pragmatic adaptation strategies reshaping vendor sourcing and pricing dynamics
The implementation of United States tariffs in 2025 has produced cumulative effects across procurement, pricing, and operational planning within the event services ecosystem. Increased duties on imported audio‑visual equipment, staging hardware, and certain electronics have driven up capital and rental costs for physical production. As a result, event providers and corporate procurement teams have re-evaluated purchasing strategies, shifting some capital outlays toward rental agreements with local partners or prioritising software-centric solutions that reduce dependency on imported hardware.
In response, service providers accelerated diversification of supply chains by developing nearer‑shore fulfilment networks and deepening relationships with domestic manufacturers and rental houses. This transition improved lead time reliability but also raised short‑term unit costs as new vendors scaled capacity. Some buyers accepted higher pass‑through costs for premium in‑person production while others reallocated budgets toward hybrid production investments that amortise expenses across virtual audiences.
Longer term, the tariff environment catalysed innovation in lightweight modular staging and cloud-managed AV workflows that reduce the volume of imported components. It also incentivised service models that emphasise subscription and managed rental over capital ownership, enabling buyers to preserve budget flexibility in an uncertain trade environment. Through these adaptations, the sector demonstrated pragmatic mitigation strategies that balanced adherence to regulatory impacts with the need to maintain event quality and audience expectations.
A nuanced segmentation framework that connects product types, event formats, service models, deployment choices, end users, and vertical needs to actionable service design
Insightful segmentation allows providers and buyers to match capabilities to specific needs, and logical grouping by type, format, service orientation, deployment model, end user, and industry vertical reveals differentiated demand vectors. When examining offerings by type, Analytics & Reporting is recognised for its split between Post‑Event Reporting and Real‑Time Analytics, which respectively support retrospective ROI assessment and live optimisation. Attendee Engagement & Networking manifests through mechanisms such as Gamification, Networking Lounge, and Polling & Surveys, each delivering distinct behavioural levers to sustain attention and catalyse connections. Event Marketing & Promotion spans Content Marketing, Email Marketing, and Social Media Marketing, reflecting the diverse channels used to build awareness and convert registrants. Onsite Services & Management pairs Logistics Management with Staff Management to ensure physical delivery, while Registration & Ticketing differentiates between Online Registration and Onsite Registration to meet varied user journeys. Venue Sourcing & Management balances Local Venue Partners with Online Venue Aggregators to reconcile local expertise and global reach, and Virtual Event Platforms divide into Hybrid Event Platforms, Virtual Collaboration Platforms, and Webcast Platforms to support differing interaction models.
Across event formats, demand separates into Hybrid Events, Physical Events, and Virtual Events, with each format carrying distinct production, technology, and measurement requirements. Service type bifurcates into Managed Services and Professional Services, where the former emphasises outcome ownership and the latter focuses on project-based expertise. Deployment considerations fall into Cloud and On‑Premises choices, reflecting trade‑offs between scalability and control. End users range from Large Enterprises to Small & Medium Enterprises, creating variation in procurement complexity, compliance needs, and scale expectations. Industry verticals such as BFSI, Education, Government & Defense, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, IT & Telecom, Manufacturing, and Retail & E‑Commerce each impose unique regulatory, technical, and audience engagement constraints that shape solution design. By aligning product roadmaps and service packages to these segment distinctions, providers can prioritise investments in platform capabilities, localized operations, and verticalised content strategies that respond directly to buyer priorities.
How divergent regional priorities across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific demand tailored delivery models, compliance approaches, and engagement strategies
Regional dynamics shape demand, delivery models, and competitive positioning in distinct ways, creating differentiated priorities for providers operating across the globe. In the 'Americas' market, enterprise adoption is driven by large corporate events, trade shows, and conferences where buyers prioritise scale, integrated CRM and marketing automation pairing, and vendor ecosystems capable of cross‑border delivery. This region also favours advanced analytics and lead‑generation integrations that align event outcomes with sales pipelines.
Across 'Europe, Middle East & Africa', regulatory diversity and sustainability imperatives influence supplier selection and event design. Buyers increasingly expect transparent carbon reporting and localized production to meet jurisdictional requirements, and the region's heterogenous market requires providers to offer flexible fulfilment models that accommodate local regulations and supplier markets. Hybrid offerings are particularly valuable here because they allow organisations to balance in‑person presence with broader virtual reach.
Within 'Asia‑Pacific', rapid digitalisation, high mobile engagement rates, and growing investment in experience marketing have accelerated adoption of virtual collaboration and hybrid event platforms. Infrastructure variability across markets means that providers must balance cloud capabilities with edge fulfilment and local partner networks to assure performance. Moreover, cost sensitivity coexists with appetite for innovative engagement formats, creating opportunities for scalable, lower‑latency solutions that support multi‑lingual and culturally adaptive programming.
An overview of competitive patterns showing platform convergence, strategic partnerships, and capability-led differentiation shaping supplier strategies and buyer choices
Competitive dynamics in the event management services space are driven by a mix of platform innovation, service breadth, and operational reach. Leading providers differentiate through platform convergence that brings registration, engagement, analytics, and onsite operations under a single orchestration layer, while specialist firms emphasise deep vertical expertise or unique production capabilities. Strategic partnerships between technology vendors, local fulfilment networks, and creative agencies have become common as firms seek to deliver seamless attendee experiences without owning every component of the value chain.
Providers that succeed tend to excel in two dimensions: the ability to deliver consistent experience quality across formats and geographies, and the capacity to translate event interactions into measurable downstream outcomes. Investment priorities include governance and privacy features, interoperability through open APIs, and modular pricing structures that facilitate trials and phased rollouts. Talent and operational networks remain a differentiator, particularly for complex physical and hybrid productions where local knowledge and reliable staging partners determine execution risk.
At the same time, competitive pressure encourages consolidation and M&A activity as firms seek to expand their geographic footprint, add complementary capabilities, and accelerate time to market. Buyers can expect continued refinement of end‑to‑end service models, more transparent procurement terms, and an expanded menu of subscription and outcome-based commercial arrangements as companies align offerings to enterprise procurement practices.
Practical, high‑impact recommendations for enterprise leaders to build resilient, measurable, and scalable event programs that align with strategic priorities
Leaders in enterprise event strategy should pursue a set of pragmatic actions to capitalise on current trends and reduce operational risk. First, prioritise modular platform architectures and API integrations that allow rapid assembly of solutions while preserving data governance and user privacy. Second, invest in hybrid production capabilities and design templates that ensure equitable experiences for both in‑person and virtual attendees, thereby protecting brand equity across formats. Third, build or deepen local fulfilment networks to mitigate supply chain volatility and to reduce the lead times that erode campaign agility.
Additionally, organisations should develop outcome‑oriented commercial frameworks with providers, aligning incentives to attendee engagement metrics, lead conversion quality, and post‑event attribution. Emphasise sustainability by adopting measurable carbon reduction practices and vendor reporting requirements, as this will increasingly influence buyer and stakeholder perception. Talent development is also essential: combine internal program management skills with external production expertise to maintain continuity and institutional knowledge.
Finally, adopt a phased approach to advanced analytics, starting with real‑time monitoring for live optimisation and extending to post‑event attribution frameworks that feed back into program design. By executing these recommendations, leaders will be well positioned to deliver repeatable, measurable event programs that align with broader organisational objectives and deliver tangible business impact.
A transparent mixed‑methods research approach combining practitioner interviews, secondary review, triangulation, and scenario analysis to validate findings and recommendations
The research underpinning this analysis combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to produce balanced, verifiable insights. Primary inputs included structured interviews with event buyers, service providers, production partners, and technology leaders operating across multiple geographies and verticals. These interviews focused on procurement criteria, operational challenges, platform preferences, and forward‑looking priorities, ensuring the perspective of both buyers and suppliers.
Secondary research consisted of an exhaustive review of public filings, vendor product documentation, regulatory guidance, and industry thought leadership to contextualise primary findings and to identify technology and operational trends. Data triangulation methods were applied to reconcile differing viewpoints and to validate recurring themes. Additionally, scenario analysis was used to assess the operational implications of policy shifts, supply chain disruptions, and emergent technologies.
To maintain rigor, all conclusions were subjected to internal peer review and cross‑checked with practitioner feedback during validation workshops. Limitations include variability in regional disclosure practices and the rapid pace of technological innovation, which may alter supplier roadmaps. Nonetheless, the methodology emphasises transparency and traceability so readers can understand the evidence behind each recommendation and adapt them to their specific organisational context.
A concise synthesis of how strategic alignment, operational investments, and platform innovation will determine success in delivering measurable event experiences
In conclusion, event management as a service has matured into a strategic capability that combines technological sophistication, operational depth, and outcome orientation. Providers and buyers are realigning around hybrid delivery models, modular integration, and data governance practices that enable rapid experimentation while preserving consistency and compliance. The cumulative effects of trade policy shifts and supply chain pressures have accelerated moves toward rental and managed service models, and regional variation in regulatory and infrastructure conditions continues to drive differentiated go‑to‑market strategies.
The sectors most ready to capitalise on these shifts will be those that embrace modular platform architectures, invest in local fulfilment and talent networks, and adopt outcome‑oriented commercial relationships with suppliers. For buyers, the priority is to articulate clear KPIs, demand interoperability, and require transparent reporting on both engagement outcomes and sustainability metrics. For providers, the imperative is to deliver reproducible quality across geographies, to innovate in production efficiency, and to build trust through demonstrable privacy and compliance capabilities.
Taken together, these strategic adjustments will drive better event experiences, more predictable operational outcomes, and closer alignment between event investments and organisational objectives. Organisations that move decisively today will secure competitive advantage as experience marketing continues to shape customer and stakeholder relationships.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Emergence of AI-driven personalization engines optimizing attendee engagement at scale
- 5.2. Integration of blockchain-based ticketing solutions to enhance event security and transparency
- 5.3. Adoption of hybrid event platforms enabling seamless transitions between virtual and in-person experiences
- 5.4. Deployment of real-time analytics dashboards for monitoring event performance metrics and ROI
- 5.5. Utilization of virtual reality environments to create immersive event experiences for remote attendees
- 5.6. Incorporation of contactless technologies and biometric screening for post-pandemic event safety protocols
- 5.7. Implementation of end-to-end automation in event workflows from registration to post-event follow-up
- 5.8. Partnerships between event management platforms and social media networks for live streaming monetization
- 5.9. Rise of sustainability-focused event planning modules reducing carbon footprint through digital tools
- 5.10. Integration of chatbots and voice assistants for personalized attendee support and networking facilitation
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Event Management as a Service Market, by Type
- 8.1. Analytics & Reporting
- 8.1.1. Post-Event Reporting
- 8.1.2. Real-Time Analytics
- 8.2. Attendee Engagement & Networking
- 8.2.1. Gamification
- 8.2.2. Networking Lounge
- 8.2.3. Polling & Surveys
- 8.3. Event Marketing & Promotion
- 8.3.1. Content Marketing
- 8.3.2. Email Marketing
- 8.3.3. Social Media Marketing
- 8.4. Onsite Services & Management
- 8.4.1. Logistics Management
- 8.4.2. Staff Management
- 8.5. Registration & Ticketing
- 8.5.1. Online Registration
- 8.5.2. Onsite Registration
- 8.6. Venue Sourcing & Management
- 8.6.1. Local Venue Partners
- 8.6.2. Online Venue Aggregators
- 8.7. Virtual Event Platforms
- 8.7.1. Hybrid Event Platforms
- 8.7.2. Virtual Collaboration Platforms
- 8.7.3. Webcast Platforms
- 9. Event Management as a Service Market, by Event Format
- 9.1. Hybrid Events
- 9.2. Physical Events
- 9.3. Virtual Events
- 10. Event Management as a Service Market, by Service Type
- 10.1. Managed Services
- 10.2. Professional Services
- 11. Event Management as a Service Market, by Deployment Model
- 11.1. Cloud
- 11.2. On-Premises
- 12. Event Management as a Service Market, by End User
- 12.1. Large Enterprises
- 12.2. Small & Medium Enterprises
- 13. Event Management as a Service Market, by Industry Vertical
- 13.1. BFSI
- 13.2. Education
- 13.3. Government & Defense
- 13.4. Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
- 13.5. IT & Telecom
- 13.6. Manufacturing
- 13.7. Retail & E-Commerce
- 14. Event Management as a Service Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Event Management as a Service Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Event Management as a Service Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. 3cket – Ticketing System Lda.
- 17.3.2. Accelevents, Inc.
- 17.3.3. Arlo Software Limited
- 17.3.4. Aventri, Inc.
- 17.3.5. Bitrix, Inc.
- 17.3.6. Bizzabo Ltd.
- 17.3.7. Certain, Inc.
- 17.3.8. Cvent, Inc.
- 17.3.9. Eventbrite, Inc.
- 17.3.10. EventMobi
- 17.3.11. Eventzilla Corporation
- 17.3.12. Glue Up, Inc.
- 17.3.13. Hopin, Inc.
- 17.3.14. Hubb, Inc.
- 17.3.15. Hubilo Pte. Ltd.
- 17.3.16. Idloom SA
- 17.3.17. Meeting Evolution, LLC
- 17.3.18. MeetingPlay, Inc.
- 17.3.19. Regpack, Inc.
- 17.3.20. Splash Technologies, Inc.
- 17.3.21. Splash That, Inc.
- 17.3.22. Swapcard SAS
- 17.3.23. Tripleseat, LLC
- 17.3.24. Ungerboeck Systems International, LLC
- 17.3.25. vFairs LLC
- 17.3.26. XING Events GmbH
- 17.3.27. Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.


