Ethyleneamines Market by Type (Diethylenetriamine, Ethylenediamine, Pentaethylenehexamine), Manufacturing Process (Ethylene Dichloride (EDC) process, Reductive Amination (RA)), Application, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Ethyleneamines Market was valued at USD 4.27 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.53 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.95%, reaching USD 6.79 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction to ethyleneamines chemistry, supply dynamics, and decision-relevant context for stakeholders across multiple industrial value chains
Ethyleneamines comprise a family of nitrogen-containing organic compounds that play foundational roles across a wide range of industrial formulations. Their chemical versatility, manifested through multiple amine functionalities, makes them indispensable as curing agents, chelating intermediates, surfactant precursors, and corrosion inhibitors. Because these compounds intersect with end markets from agriculture to oil and gas, understanding ethyleneamines requires a cross-disciplinary perspective that combines chemical knowledge with downstream application realities.
This introduction frames the technical characteristics, supply chain architecture, and stakeholder needs that underpin strategic decision-making. It emphasizes how feedstock dynamics, regulatory pressures around hazardous substances, and formulation innovation collectively shape procurement strategies and product development priorities. In the paragraphs that follow, readers will find a coherent foundation to interpret later sections on transformative shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation insights, and recommended actions. The aim is to equip executives, R&D leaders, and procurement managers with an immediately usable context for assessing risk, opportunity, and investment priorities in the ethyleneamines landscape.
Detailed analysis of converging sustainability, supply chain reconfiguration, and formulation-driven forces reshaping the ethyleneamines landscape
The ethyleneamines landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging forces in sustainability, supply chain reconfiguration, and application-driven formulation change. On the sustainability front, manufacturers and downstream formulators are accelerating efforts to reduce energy intensity, minimize hazardous byproducts, and adapt to evolving regulatory frameworks that target emissions and worker safety. As a result, process optimization, solvent substitution, and closed-loop recycling of amine-containing streams have risen on corporate agendas, fostering incremental innovation across manufacturing sites.
Concurrently, supply chain reconfiguration is reshaping sourcing strategies. Firms are diversifying supplier portfolios to mitigate geopolitical exposures and feedstock volatility, while also exploring nearshoring and regionalized production hubs that better align with end-use demand clusters. This redistribution favors partners capable of rapid scale-up and consistent quality control. Finally, application-driven formulation change is altering product specifications: adhesives and sealants require amines tuned for lower odor and faster cure; agrochemical formulations demand high-purity intermediates with predictable reactivity; and water treatment systems favor corrosion inhibitors and chelants with improved environmental profiles. Taken together, these shifts create both risks and openings for organizations that can synchronize technical capability with flexible commercial models.
Assessment of how 2025 tariff policies have driven contractual resilience, regional sourcing strategies, and supply chain adaptations across ethyleneamines value chains
The cumulative effect of tariff measures enacted in 2025 on ethyleneamines and related intermediates has prompted a strategic re-evaluation across supply chains, contract terms, and sourcing geographies. Tariff pressures have incentivized procurement teams to revisit supplier contracts, enforce greater transparency in landed-cost calculations, and incorporate tariff contingency clauses that address duty pass-through and force majeure interpretations. As a consequence, many buyers have pursued multi-sourcing arrangements that prioritize suppliers with regional manufacturing presence or tariff-exempt routing options to reduce exposure to sudden cost shocks.
In response to elevated trade friction, producers have adjusted commercial terms and logistics strategies to preserve customer relationships while protecting margins. This has included renegotiation of long-term agreements, expansion of bonded warehousing to defer duties, and greater reliance on local tolling or contract manufacturing to maintain market access. In parallel, downstream formulators have accelerated product reformulation efforts to reduce dependency on imported specialty grades, seeking alternative chemistries or adapting process parameters to accommodate domestically available amine grades. Taken together, these responses highlight an industry increasingly adept at operational flexibility, with clear emphasis on contractual resilience and regional supply options to mitigate the cumulative impacts of tariff policy changes.
In-depth segmentation insights linking ethyleneamine chemistry types to application-specific performance criteria and end-use industry subsegments for precise commercial alignment
Segmentation insight demands a nuanced reading of product types, application pathways, and end-use industry needs because performance requirements diverge significantly across use cases. Based on type, the market is examined through the lens of Diethylenetriamine, Ethylenediamine, Pentaethylenehexamine, and Triethylenetetramine, recognizing distinct reactivity profiles, impurity tolerances, and handling constraints for each amine. Diethylenetriamine and Pentaethylenehexamine commonly serve as crosslinking agents in polymerization chemistries, whereas Ethylenediamine frequently functions as a building block for surfactants and chelants; Triethylenetetramine often finds use where multi-functional amine behavior delivers corrosion inhibition or epoxy curing performance.
Based on application, insights must account for divergent performance drivers in Adhesives & Sealants, Agrochemicals, Corrosion Inhibitors, Oilfield Chemicals, Polymerization, Surfactants, and Water Treatment. Adhesives and sealants prioritize cure speed, bond strength, and user safety, while agrochemical uses stress purity, predictable reactivity, and regulatory compliance for crop protection and fertilizer additives. Corrosion inhibitor and oilfield chemical applications depend on thermal stability and compatibility with complex brines, and surfactant or water treatment roles call for tailored hydrophilic-lipophilic balance and biodegradability where environmental constraints apply. Based on end use industry, segmentation differentiates Agriculture, Automotive, Construction, Oil & Gas, and Water Treatment, with Agriculture further divided into Crop Protection and Fertilizer Additives; Automotive separated into Aftermarket and OEM; Construction split across Commercial, Infrastructure, and Residential; Oil & Gas distinguished by Downstream, Midstream, and Upstream; and Water Treatment categorized into Industrial and Municipal. These layered distinctions drive procurement specifications, quality assurance protocols, and commercial prioritization as each combination of type, application, and end use creates unique technical and regulatory trade-offs that shape product selection and supply chain design.
Comprehensive regional insights connecting capacity footprints, regulatory drivers, and demand centers across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific geographies
Regional dynamics are central to strategy because manufacturing capacity, regulatory regimes, and end-use demand differ markedly across geographies. In the Americas, feedstock access and logistics flexibility influence where producers locate capacity, while downstream sectors such as oil and gas and construction create localized demand corridors that reward integrated supply chain partnerships. In EMEA, regulatory complexity and a strong emphasis on sustainability shape product specifications and investment decisions, prompting manufacturers to adopt cleaner production practices and to emphasize compliance documentation and lifecycle considerations. In Asia-Pacific, the broad base of chemical manufacturing capability and proximity to major downstream converters drive volume-focused supply models, rapid scale-up potential, and increasingly sophisticated local R&D that tailors grades to regional formulation preferences.
Taken together, these regional dynamics imply that companies should calibrate go-to-market strategies by aligning plant footprint, logistics design, and regulatory affairs capability with the dominant demand drivers in each geography. For instance, European and Middle Eastern regulatory scrutiny may necessitate enhanced product stewardship and detailed technical dossiers, whereas Asia-Pacific sourcing advantages can be leveraged to support cost-competitive formulations for high-volume applications. Moreover, cross-regional partnerships, toll-manufacturing agreements, and regional warehouses emerge as effective tools to bridge demand variability and regulatory divergence while preserving supply continuity.
Key competitive insights highlighting how technical excellence, regional service capability, and collaborative commercialization determine leadership in the ethyleneamines sector
Competitive dynamics in the ethyleneamines value chain are characterized by a mix of global chemical producers, specialized regional manufacturers, and nimble toll processors who together shape technology diffusion and commercial terms. Leading producers differentiate on process robustness, impurity profile control, and certifications that support sensitive downstream applications. At the same time, smaller regional players leverage logistical proximity and service-oriented commercial models to serve niche applications or localized demand pockets.
Strategic collaboration between producers and downstream formulators is increasingly common, as co-development projects reduce time-to-market for specialty grades and secure long-term off-take commitments. Investments in process intensification, continuous production, and improved waste-management technologies are central to competitive positioning, enabling cost efficiencies while addressing sustainability expectations. In addition, suppliers that offer technical support, regulatory documentation, and tailored logistics solutions tend to capture premium relationships with formulators who require consistent lot-to-lot performance and traceability. Overall, the competitive landscape rewards integrated capabilities that combine technical excellence, regulatory readiness, and flexible commercial models.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to enhance resilience, sustainability, and commercial differentiation across ethyleneamines supply chains and portfolios
Industry leaders should prioritize a portfolio of actions that advance both resilience and differentiation in ethyleneamines supply chains. First, implement supplier diversification strategies that emphasize regional redundancy and alignment with high-demand end-use clusters to reduce exposure to tariff and logistics shocks. Second, accelerate investments in process improvements and waste reduction technologies to lower environmental footprint and improve compliance readiness; such investments also reduce operational variability and support premium positioning for sustainability-conscious buyers.
Third, develop closer technical partnerships with downstream formulators to co-develop specialty amine grades that meet evolving application requirements, thereby increasing switching costs and securing long-term offtake. Fourth, augment commercial contracts with contingency clauses and flexible logistics options, including bonded storage or regional tolling agreements, to manage duty volatility and shipping disruption. Finally, enhance product stewardship and documentation processes to meet stringent regulatory and procurement standards, thereby smoothing market entry into heavily regulated applications such as agrochemicals and municipal water treatment. Together, these actions create a defensible competitive posture that balances operational resilience with targeted market differentiation.
Robust mixed-methods research methodology combining expert interviews, secondary technical analysis, and rigorous triangulation to validate ethyleneamines industry insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined qualitative expert interviews, targeted secondary research, and rigorous data validation to ensure insight relevance and practical applicability. Primary inputs included structured interviews with technical leaders in formulation, procurement, and plant operations, which provided first-hand perspectives on specification drivers, supply constraints, and real-world performance trade-offs. These interviews were complemented by a review of regulatory registries, patent filings, and public technical literature that informed understanding of process technologies, impurity control measures, and application-specific performance requirements.
To ensure analytical rigor, the research applied triangulation across data sources and validated key themes through follow-up consultations with industry experts. Scenario mapping was used to explore supply chain responses to policy shifts and logistics disruptions, while supplier capability assessments focused on manufacturing footprint, quality systems, and technical support offerings. The methodology prioritized transparency, repeatability, and alignment with the practical decision-making needs of commercial and technical stakeholders.
Conclusive synthesis of strategic imperatives linking supply chain agility, sustainability investments, and technical partnerships to long-term ethyleneamines competitiveness
In conclusion, ethyleneamines remain essential intermediates whose strategic importance spans adhesives, agrochemicals, corrosion protection, polymer chemistry, surfactants, and water treatment. The interplay of sustainability mandates, evolving regulatory expectations, and trade policy dynamics has increased the premium on supply chain agility, technical collaboration, and product stewardship. Companies that align manufacturing capability with regional demand, invest in cleaner production technologies, and deepen technical engagements with downstream customers will capture disproportionate strategic advantage.
Moving forward, the industry must balance near-term operational resilience with longer-term transitions toward lower-impact chemistries and more circular practices. By prioritizing supplier diversification, process improvements, and partnership-driven innovation, stakeholders can mitigate policy and logistics risks while positioning their portfolios for sustained relevance across diverse end-use industries. These steps will be essential for organizations seeking to turn current disruption into durable competitive differentiation.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction to ethyleneamines chemistry, supply dynamics, and decision-relevant context for stakeholders across multiple industrial value chains
Ethyleneamines comprise a family of nitrogen-containing organic compounds that play foundational roles across a wide range of industrial formulations. Their chemical versatility, manifested through multiple amine functionalities, makes them indispensable as curing agents, chelating intermediates, surfactant precursors, and corrosion inhibitors. Because these compounds intersect with end markets from agriculture to oil and gas, understanding ethyleneamines requires a cross-disciplinary perspective that combines chemical knowledge with downstream application realities.
This introduction frames the technical characteristics, supply chain architecture, and stakeholder needs that underpin strategic decision-making. It emphasizes how feedstock dynamics, regulatory pressures around hazardous substances, and formulation innovation collectively shape procurement strategies and product development priorities. In the paragraphs that follow, readers will find a coherent foundation to interpret later sections on transformative shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation insights, and recommended actions. The aim is to equip executives, R&D leaders, and procurement managers with an immediately usable context for assessing risk, opportunity, and investment priorities in the ethyleneamines landscape.
Detailed analysis of converging sustainability, supply chain reconfiguration, and formulation-driven forces reshaping the ethyleneamines landscape
The ethyleneamines landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging forces in sustainability, supply chain reconfiguration, and application-driven formulation change. On the sustainability front, manufacturers and downstream formulators are accelerating efforts to reduce energy intensity, minimize hazardous byproducts, and adapt to evolving regulatory frameworks that target emissions and worker safety. As a result, process optimization, solvent substitution, and closed-loop recycling of amine-containing streams have risen on corporate agendas, fostering incremental innovation across manufacturing sites.
Concurrently, supply chain reconfiguration is reshaping sourcing strategies. Firms are diversifying supplier portfolios to mitigate geopolitical exposures and feedstock volatility, while also exploring nearshoring and regionalized production hubs that better align with end-use demand clusters. This redistribution favors partners capable of rapid scale-up and consistent quality control. Finally, application-driven formulation change is altering product specifications: adhesives and sealants require amines tuned for lower odor and faster cure; agrochemical formulations demand high-purity intermediates with predictable reactivity; and water treatment systems favor corrosion inhibitors and chelants with improved environmental profiles. Taken together, these shifts create both risks and openings for organizations that can synchronize technical capability with flexible commercial models.
Assessment of how 2025 tariff policies have driven contractual resilience, regional sourcing strategies, and supply chain adaptations across ethyleneamines value chains
The cumulative effect of tariff measures enacted in 2025 on ethyleneamines and related intermediates has prompted a strategic re-evaluation across supply chains, contract terms, and sourcing geographies. Tariff pressures have incentivized procurement teams to revisit supplier contracts, enforce greater transparency in landed-cost calculations, and incorporate tariff contingency clauses that address duty pass-through and force majeure interpretations. As a consequence, many buyers have pursued multi-sourcing arrangements that prioritize suppliers with regional manufacturing presence or tariff-exempt routing options to reduce exposure to sudden cost shocks.
In response to elevated trade friction, producers have adjusted commercial terms and logistics strategies to preserve customer relationships while protecting margins. This has included renegotiation of long-term agreements, expansion of bonded warehousing to defer duties, and greater reliance on local tolling or contract manufacturing to maintain market access. In parallel, downstream formulators have accelerated product reformulation efforts to reduce dependency on imported specialty grades, seeking alternative chemistries or adapting process parameters to accommodate domestically available amine grades. Taken together, these responses highlight an industry increasingly adept at operational flexibility, with clear emphasis on contractual resilience and regional supply options to mitigate the cumulative impacts of tariff policy changes.
In-depth segmentation insights linking ethyleneamine chemistry types to application-specific performance criteria and end-use industry subsegments for precise commercial alignment
Segmentation insight demands a nuanced reading of product types, application pathways, and end-use industry needs because performance requirements diverge significantly across use cases. Based on type, the market is examined through the lens of Diethylenetriamine, Ethylenediamine, Pentaethylenehexamine, and Triethylenetetramine, recognizing distinct reactivity profiles, impurity tolerances, and handling constraints for each amine. Diethylenetriamine and Pentaethylenehexamine commonly serve as crosslinking agents in polymerization chemistries, whereas Ethylenediamine frequently functions as a building block for surfactants and chelants; Triethylenetetramine often finds use where multi-functional amine behavior delivers corrosion inhibition or epoxy curing performance.
Based on application, insights must account for divergent performance drivers in Adhesives & Sealants, Agrochemicals, Corrosion Inhibitors, Oilfield Chemicals, Polymerization, Surfactants, and Water Treatment. Adhesives and sealants prioritize cure speed, bond strength, and user safety, while agrochemical uses stress purity, predictable reactivity, and regulatory compliance for crop protection and fertilizer additives. Corrosion inhibitor and oilfield chemical applications depend on thermal stability and compatibility with complex brines, and surfactant or water treatment roles call for tailored hydrophilic-lipophilic balance and biodegradability where environmental constraints apply. Based on end use industry, segmentation differentiates Agriculture, Automotive, Construction, Oil & Gas, and Water Treatment, with Agriculture further divided into Crop Protection and Fertilizer Additives; Automotive separated into Aftermarket and OEM; Construction split across Commercial, Infrastructure, and Residential; Oil & Gas distinguished by Downstream, Midstream, and Upstream; and Water Treatment categorized into Industrial and Municipal. These layered distinctions drive procurement specifications, quality assurance protocols, and commercial prioritization as each combination of type, application, and end use creates unique technical and regulatory trade-offs that shape product selection and supply chain design.
Comprehensive regional insights connecting capacity footprints, regulatory drivers, and demand centers across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific geographies
Regional dynamics are central to strategy because manufacturing capacity, regulatory regimes, and end-use demand differ markedly across geographies. In the Americas, feedstock access and logistics flexibility influence where producers locate capacity, while downstream sectors such as oil and gas and construction create localized demand corridors that reward integrated supply chain partnerships. In EMEA, regulatory complexity and a strong emphasis on sustainability shape product specifications and investment decisions, prompting manufacturers to adopt cleaner production practices and to emphasize compliance documentation and lifecycle considerations. In Asia-Pacific, the broad base of chemical manufacturing capability and proximity to major downstream converters drive volume-focused supply models, rapid scale-up potential, and increasingly sophisticated local R&D that tailors grades to regional formulation preferences.
Taken together, these regional dynamics imply that companies should calibrate go-to-market strategies by aligning plant footprint, logistics design, and regulatory affairs capability with the dominant demand drivers in each geography. For instance, European and Middle Eastern regulatory scrutiny may necessitate enhanced product stewardship and detailed technical dossiers, whereas Asia-Pacific sourcing advantages can be leveraged to support cost-competitive formulations for high-volume applications. Moreover, cross-regional partnerships, toll-manufacturing agreements, and regional warehouses emerge as effective tools to bridge demand variability and regulatory divergence while preserving supply continuity.
Key competitive insights highlighting how technical excellence, regional service capability, and collaborative commercialization determine leadership in the ethyleneamines sector
Competitive dynamics in the ethyleneamines value chain are characterized by a mix of global chemical producers, specialized regional manufacturers, and nimble toll processors who together shape technology diffusion and commercial terms. Leading producers differentiate on process robustness, impurity profile control, and certifications that support sensitive downstream applications. At the same time, smaller regional players leverage logistical proximity and service-oriented commercial models to serve niche applications or localized demand pockets.
Strategic collaboration between producers and downstream formulators is increasingly common, as co-development projects reduce time-to-market for specialty grades and secure long-term off-take commitments. Investments in process intensification, continuous production, and improved waste-management technologies are central to competitive positioning, enabling cost efficiencies while addressing sustainability expectations. In addition, suppliers that offer technical support, regulatory documentation, and tailored logistics solutions tend to capture premium relationships with formulators who require consistent lot-to-lot performance and traceability. Overall, the competitive landscape rewards integrated capabilities that combine technical excellence, regulatory readiness, and flexible commercial models.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to enhance resilience, sustainability, and commercial differentiation across ethyleneamines supply chains and portfolios
Industry leaders should prioritize a portfolio of actions that advance both resilience and differentiation in ethyleneamines supply chains. First, implement supplier diversification strategies that emphasize regional redundancy and alignment with high-demand end-use clusters to reduce exposure to tariff and logistics shocks. Second, accelerate investments in process improvements and waste reduction technologies to lower environmental footprint and improve compliance readiness; such investments also reduce operational variability and support premium positioning for sustainability-conscious buyers.
Third, develop closer technical partnerships with downstream formulators to co-develop specialty amine grades that meet evolving application requirements, thereby increasing switching costs and securing long-term offtake. Fourth, augment commercial contracts with contingency clauses and flexible logistics options, including bonded storage or regional tolling agreements, to manage duty volatility and shipping disruption. Finally, enhance product stewardship and documentation processes to meet stringent regulatory and procurement standards, thereby smoothing market entry into heavily regulated applications such as agrochemicals and municipal water treatment. Together, these actions create a defensible competitive posture that balances operational resilience with targeted market differentiation.
Robust mixed-methods research methodology combining expert interviews, secondary technical analysis, and rigorous triangulation to validate ethyleneamines industry insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined qualitative expert interviews, targeted secondary research, and rigorous data validation to ensure insight relevance and practical applicability. Primary inputs included structured interviews with technical leaders in formulation, procurement, and plant operations, which provided first-hand perspectives on specification drivers, supply constraints, and real-world performance trade-offs. These interviews were complemented by a review of regulatory registries, patent filings, and public technical literature that informed understanding of process technologies, impurity control measures, and application-specific performance requirements.
To ensure analytical rigor, the research applied triangulation across data sources and validated key themes through follow-up consultations with industry experts. Scenario mapping was used to explore supply chain responses to policy shifts and logistics disruptions, while supplier capability assessments focused on manufacturing footprint, quality systems, and technical support offerings. The methodology prioritized transparency, repeatability, and alignment with the practical decision-making needs of commercial and technical stakeholders.
Conclusive synthesis of strategic imperatives linking supply chain agility, sustainability investments, and technical partnerships to long-term ethyleneamines competitiveness
In conclusion, ethyleneamines remain essential intermediates whose strategic importance spans adhesives, agrochemicals, corrosion protection, polymer chemistry, surfactants, and water treatment. The interplay of sustainability mandates, evolving regulatory expectations, and trade policy dynamics has increased the premium on supply chain agility, technical collaboration, and product stewardship. Companies that align manufacturing capability with regional demand, invest in cleaner production technologies, and deepen technical engagements with downstream customers will capture disproportionate strategic advantage.
Moving forward, the industry must balance near-term operational resilience with longer-term transitions toward lower-impact chemistries and more circular practices. By prioritizing supplier diversification, process improvements, and partnership-driven innovation, stakeholders can mitigate policy and logistics risks while positioning their portfolios for sustained relevance across diverse end-use industries. These steps will be essential for organizations seeking to turn current disruption into durable competitive differentiation.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
184 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising adoption of bio-based ethyleneamines to meet sustainable chemistry demands
- 5.2. Impact of stringent environmental regulations on ethyleneamine production processes
- 5.3. Supply chain disruptions driving regional reshoring of ethyleneamine manufacturing
- 5.4. Innovations in catalyst technology enhancing selectivity of ethyleneamine synthesis
- 5.5. Growing demand for ethyleneamine-derived polyamide resins in automotive composites
- 5.6. Expansion of ethyleneamine consumption in flue gas treatment for carbon capture applications
- 5.7. Strategic partnerships between chemical producers to secure ethylene feedstock supply
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Ethyleneamines Market, by Type
- 8.1. Diethylenetriamine
- 8.2. Ethylenediamine
- 8.3. Pentaethylenehexamine
- 8.4. Triethylenetetramine
- 9. Ethyleneamines Market, by Manufacturing Process
- 9.1. Ethylene Dichloride (EDC) process
- 9.2. Reductive Amination (RA)
- 10. Ethyleneamines Market, by Application
- 10.1. Adhesives & Sealants
- 10.2. Agrochemicals
- 10.3. Corrosion Inhibitors
- 10.4. Oilfield Chemicals
- 10.5. Polymerization
- 10.6. Surfactants
- 10.7. Water Treatment
- 11. Ethyleneamines Market, by End Use Industry
- 11.1. Agriculture
- 11.1.1. Crop Protection
- 11.1.2. Fertilizer Additives
- 11.2. Automotive
- 11.2.1. Aftermarket
- 11.2.2. OEM
- 11.3. Construction
- 11.3.1. Commercial
- 11.3.2. Infrastructure
- 11.3.3. Residential
- 11.4. Oil & Gas
- 11.4.1. Downstream
- 11.4.2. Midstream
- 11.4.3. Upstream
- 11.5. Water Treatment
- 11.5.1. Industrial
- 11.5.2. Municipal
- 12. Ethyleneamines Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Ethyleneamines Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Ethyleneamines Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Akzo Nobel N.V.
- 15.3.2. Alkyl Amines Chemicals Limited
- 15.3.3. Arabian Amines Company
- 15.3.4. BASF SE
- 15.3.5. Cole-Parmer Instrument Company, LLC
- 15.3.6. Delamine B.V.
- 15.3.7. Diamines and Chemicals Ltd.
- 15.3.8. Dow Chemical Company
- 15.3.9. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 15.3.10. Gem Chemicals
- 15.3.11. Huntsman International LL
- 15.3.12. Kelvion Holding GmbH
- 15.3.13. LANXESS AG
- 15.3.14. Lumitos AG
- 15.3.15. Nouryon Chemicals Holding B.V.
- 15.3.16. Oriental Union Chemical Corporation
- 15.3.17. Paari Chem Resources Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.18. Prasol Chemicals Limited
- 15.3.19. Saanvi Corp.
- 15.3.20. Sadara Chemical Company
- 15.3.21. Saiper Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.22. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- 15.3.23. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- 15.3.24. Tosoh USA, Inc.
- 15.3.25. UTS Group
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
