Ethylene Market by Derivative Type (Alpha Olefins, Ethylene Dichloride, Ethylene Oxide), Production Process (Catalytic Cracking, Methanol-to-Olefins, Steam Cracking), Feedstocks, End Use Industry, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Ethylene Market was valued at USD 154.55 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 162.00 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.10%, reaching USD 230.25 billion by 2032.
A focused orientation to ethylene's strategic role across chemicals and materials supply chains highlighting drivers that shape operational and investment priorities
The ethylene value chain sits at the heart of modern chemical manufacturing and material production, underpinning a wide array of industrial sectors from packaging and construction to automotive and textiles. As a foundational petrochemical building block, ethylene's relevance extends beyond commodity supply, shaping product innovation cycles, feedstock selection strategies, and midstream processing investments. The dynamics influencing ethylene today arise from a confluence of feedstock availability, technological choices in production pathways, environmental regulatory regimes, and shifting demand patterns across end use industries.
In this context, stakeholders require a concise, authoritative synthesis that clarifies how structural shifts are altering competitive advantages, where investment risk is concentrating, and which operational levers deliver resilience. This introduction frames the subsequent analysis by grounding readers in the primary technical and commercial drivers that respectively enable and constrain ethylene production and derivative development. It also highlights the importance of integrating feedstock strategy with downstream market needs, and of aligning capital allocation with evolving regulatory landscapes and consumer-driven sustainability expectations.
How rapid technological, regulatory, and feedstock diversification trends are reshaping competitive positions and investment calculus across the ethylene ecosystem
The landscape for ethylene production and consumption is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological advances, sustainability requirements, and supply chain realignments. Novel process technologies and optimization of existing crackers are redefining capital efficiency, while increasing interest in lower-carbon feedstocks and circular-feed approaches is reshaping feedstock mixes. At the same time, demand-side dynamics such as growth in high-performance polymers for electronics and lightweighting in automotive applications are redirecting derivative priorities and prompting investments in specialty grades.
Transitioning from legacy feedstock dependence toward diversified inputs has significant implications for regional competitiveness and trade flows. Improvements in process integration and the scaling of methanol-to-olefins, catalytic cracking variants, and steam cracking optimizations are reducing specific energy consumption and unit operating costs, thereby altering the calculus for greenfield and brownfield projects. Regulatory pressures and corporate decarbonization commitments are accelerating the adoption of emissions-reduction technologies across operations, which in turn influence sourcing decisions and long-term contractual structures. These combined forces are reframing how producers, downstream manufacturers, and buyers plan capacity, negotiate offtakes, and prioritize innovation agendas.
Quantifying tariff-driven trade realignments and the operational responses shaping procurement, logistics, and contractual strategies within the ethylene value chain
Recent tariff measures introduced by the United States in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity into global ethylene-related trade and supply chain planning. Tariff adjustments have immediate implications for cost structures and procurement strategies, prompting both exporters and importers to reassess routing, contractual terms, and sourcing alternatives. Producers who historically relied on cross-border flows are revisiting commercial strategies, balancing short-term disruptions against longer-term reconfigurations of supplier portfolios and destination markets.
The tariffs also accelerate strategic responses among downstream converters and integrated chemical producers who may seek to insulate operations through vertical integration, local sourcing, or renegotiated supplier agreements. Shippers and logistics providers are adapting route plans and capacity allocations to accommodate altered trade patterns, while traders are exploring hedging and forward-cover mechanisms to manage margin volatility. Overlaid on these commercial adjustments are regulatory compliance obligations and documentation complexities that add administrative burden to cross-border transactions. Collectively, these developments reinforce the need for scenario-based planning that integrates tariff risk into procurement, capital allocation, and contract design decisions.
A granular segmentation-driven perspective linking production pathways, feedstock choices, derivative specializations, distribution channels, and end-use demands to strategic priorities
Understanding segmentation is essential to interpreting how value is created and captured across the ethylene ecosystem. Based on Derivative Type, the landscape spans Alpha Olefins, Ethylene Dichloride, Ethylene Oxide, and Polyethylene, each serving distinct downstream applications and commanding different quality and processing requirements. Differences among these derivatives influence catalysts, purification steps, and polymerization capacity planning, requiring producers to tailor asset configurations and commercial approaches to derivative-specific demand profiles. Based on Production Process, the market is studied across Catalytic Cracking, Methanol-to-Olefins, and Steam Cracking, with Steam Cracking further examined through Ethane Cracking, Light Naphtha Cracking, and Propane Cracking; the choice of process pathway informs capital intensity, feedstock flexibility, and emissions footprint and therefore shapes project viability and retrofit potential.
Based on Feedstocks, assessment spans Bioethanol, Butane, Ethane, Liquefied Petroleum Gas, Naphtha, and Propane, reflecting how availability, price volatility, and sustainability criteria drive feedstock strategy. Feedstock selection impacts operational continuity, co-product streams, and the feasibility of integrating lower-carbon inputs. Based on Distribution Channel, the study differentiates Direct Sales and Online Platforms, with Online Platforms further explored through Company Portals and E-Commerce Marketplaces; distribution choices affect margin structure, customer engagement models, and service levels, especially for specialty grades and smaller-volume transactions. Finally, based on End Use Industry, the analysis covers Agriculture, Automotive, Chemical, Construction, Consumer Goods, Electronics, Packaging, and Textile sectors, recognizing that application-specific performance requirements and regulatory drivers create differentiated demand patterns and innovation pathways. Together, these segmentation lenses enable stakeholders to align asset strategy, commercial focus, and R&D priorities with evolving market realities.
How distinct regional endowments, regulatory regimes, and demand compositions are determining capacity placement, commercial strategies, and resilience planning across global markets
Regional dynamics exert powerful influence over competitive advantage in ethylene production, distribution, and derivative manufacturing. In the Americas, abundant light hydrocarbons and established petrochemical clusters support a range of steam-cracking configurations and integrated downstream facilities, fostering economies of scale and supply chain depth. Investment trends in the region are shaped by feedstock economics, midstream capacity expansions, and proximity to major polymer-consuming industries. In parallel, Europe, Middle East & Africa present a diverse set of conditions where regulatory frameworks, fiscal incentives, and access to export markets create differentiated opportunities; the Middle East remains focused on leveraging hydrocarbon advantages and petrochemical integration, while Europe emphasizes decarbonization, circularity, and higher-value specialty chemistries.
Across Asia-Pacific, demand growth for packaging, electronics, and consumer goods continues to drive consumption of ethylene-derived products, while investments in new capacity and technological upgrades respond to both domestic needs and export ambitions. Supply chain resiliency concerns and regional trade policies influence how companies prioritize local versus imported feedstocks and finished products. Taken together, these regions demonstrate how resource endowments, regulatory priorities, and demand-side composition interact to define where capacity is added, how assets are configured, and which commercial strategies are most effective for capturing value in different markets.
Competitive positioning and partnership dynamics among integrated producers, regional operators, and technology licensors shaping value capture and innovation pathways
The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of integrated petrochemical majors, regional producers, and technology-focused operators, each pursuing strategies that range from scale-driven commodity production to niche specialization. Leading industrial players prioritize integrated value-chain approaches that secure feedstock supply, optimize cracker operations, and capture downstream margin through derivative and polymer offerings. Meanwhile, regional champions increasingly focus on agility, operational efficiency, and strategic partnerships that enable participation in fast-growing end markets without necessitating full vertical integration.
Technology providers and licensors play a catalytic role by supplying advanced cracking technologies, catalyst formulations, and digital solutions for process optimization and emissions monitoring. Collaborative relationships between producers and end users are becoming more common, with offtake agreements, co-investment in circularity initiatives, and joint innovation projects aligning incentives across the value chain. For investors and corporate strategists, assessing company positioning requires scrutiny of asset flexibility, feedstock diversification, decarbonization pathways, and commercial channels that enhance access to high-growth applications such as electronics-grade polymers and lightweighting solutions for transportation.
Practical strategic imperatives for leadership to strengthen resilience, pursue decarbonization, and realign commercial models for sustained competitiveness
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of actionable steps that enhance resilience, unlock value, and align operations with evolving sustainability and market demands. First, strategic feedstock diversification should be pursued to reduce exposure to single-source volatility while enabling access to lower-carbon inputs; this includes evaluating contractual frameworks, storage, and blending capabilities to maintain operational flexibility. Second, investments in process optimization and retrofit technologies can deliver energy efficiency gains and emissions reductions, supporting compliance with regulatory expectations and corporate commitments. Third, revising commercial models to incorporate flexible offtakes, blended pricing mechanisms, and closer collaboration with downstream customers will help stabilize volumes and margins under shifting trade conditions.
In parallel, companies should systematically evaluate opportunities for vertical collaboration that secure derivative market access and accelerate innovation in specialty products. Embedding advanced analytics and digital twinning into operations will improve decision velocity across maintenance, yield optimization, and logistics planning. Finally, establishing clear metrics for circularity and lifecycle impacts, and incorporating those metrics into procurement and product development decisions, will position firms to meet buyer expectations and regulatory requirements, enhancing long-term competitiveness.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining expert interviews, technical benchmarking, and scenario analysis to underpin strategic recommendations and insights
The research underpinning this executive summary synthesizes primary and secondary sources, technical literature, and expert consultation to deliver a comprehensive view of ethylene-related dynamics. Primary inputs include interviews with industry executives, plant operations managers, and technology vendors, complemented by site-level observations and process performance assessments. Secondary sources span regulatory filings, patent disclosures, technical standards, and peer-reviewed engineering studies that provide the technical foundation for evaluating production pathways, catalyst performance, and emissions mitigation options.
Analytical methods combine qualitative scenario planning with quantitative process benchmarking to assess operational trade-offs, retrofit prospects, and pathway-dependent emissions profiles. Cross-validation was conducted through triangulation of interview insights, published technical data, and observed plant performance metrics to ensure robustness. Segmentation frameworks were applied to align findings with derivative-specific requirements, feedstock variability, distribution channels, and end-use industry characteristics, thereby enabling practical recommendations that reflect both technical feasibility and commercial realities.
Synthesis of technical and commercial signals that identifies practical pathways for companies to secure advantage amid evolving operational and policy environments
This analysis synthesizes complex technical, commercial, and policy signals to provide stakeholders with a coherent view of where strategic advantage will emerge in the ethylene value chain. The interplay of feedstock choices, production pathway selection, and evolving end-use requirements creates differentiated risk-reward profiles across regions and applications. Companies that align operational flexibility with targeted product development, that invest in emissions-reduction and process optimization, and that adapt commercial terms to manage trade-related uncertainties will be better positioned to capitalize on emerging opportunities.
Ultimately, the most successful organizations will be those that integrate technical excellence with agile commercial strategies and purposeful sustainability commitments. By doing so, they can navigate tariff-induced disruptions, leverage regional strengths, and participate in structural shifts toward higher-value derivatives and circular material flows. The insights presented here are designed to inform immediate tactical choices and longer-term strategic planning across procurement, operations, and corporate development teams.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A focused orientation to ethylene's strategic role across chemicals and materials supply chains highlighting drivers that shape operational and investment priorities
The ethylene value chain sits at the heart of modern chemical manufacturing and material production, underpinning a wide array of industrial sectors from packaging and construction to automotive and textiles. As a foundational petrochemical building block, ethylene's relevance extends beyond commodity supply, shaping product innovation cycles, feedstock selection strategies, and midstream processing investments. The dynamics influencing ethylene today arise from a confluence of feedstock availability, technological choices in production pathways, environmental regulatory regimes, and shifting demand patterns across end use industries.
In this context, stakeholders require a concise, authoritative synthesis that clarifies how structural shifts are altering competitive advantages, where investment risk is concentrating, and which operational levers deliver resilience. This introduction frames the subsequent analysis by grounding readers in the primary technical and commercial drivers that respectively enable and constrain ethylene production and derivative development. It also highlights the importance of integrating feedstock strategy with downstream market needs, and of aligning capital allocation with evolving regulatory landscapes and consumer-driven sustainability expectations.
How rapid technological, regulatory, and feedstock diversification trends are reshaping competitive positions and investment calculus across the ethylene ecosystem
The landscape for ethylene production and consumption is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological advances, sustainability requirements, and supply chain realignments. Novel process technologies and optimization of existing crackers are redefining capital efficiency, while increasing interest in lower-carbon feedstocks and circular-feed approaches is reshaping feedstock mixes. At the same time, demand-side dynamics such as growth in high-performance polymers for electronics and lightweighting in automotive applications are redirecting derivative priorities and prompting investments in specialty grades.
Transitioning from legacy feedstock dependence toward diversified inputs has significant implications for regional competitiveness and trade flows. Improvements in process integration and the scaling of methanol-to-olefins, catalytic cracking variants, and steam cracking optimizations are reducing specific energy consumption and unit operating costs, thereby altering the calculus for greenfield and brownfield projects. Regulatory pressures and corporate decarbonization commitments are accelerating the adoption of emissions-reduction technologies across operations, which in turn influence sourcing decisions and long-term contractual structures. These combined forces are reframing how producers, downstream manufacturers, and buyers plan capacity, negotiate offtakes, and prioritize innovation agendas.
Quantifying tariff-driven trade realignments and the operational responses shaping procurement, logistics, and contractual strategies within the ethylene value chain
Recent tariff measures introduced by the United States in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity into global ethylene-related trade and supply chain planning. Tariff adjustments have immediate implications for cost structures and procurement strategies, prompting both exporters and importers to reassess routing, contractual terms, and sourcing alternatives. Producers who historically relied on cross-border flows are revisiting commercial strategies, balancing short-term disruptions against longer-term reconfigurations of supplier portfolios and destination markets.
The tariffs also accelerate strategic responses among downstream converters and integrated chemical producers who may seek to insulate operations through vertical integration, local sourcing, or renegotiated supplier agreements. Shippers and logistics providers are adapting route plans and capacity allocations to accommodate altered trade patterns, while traders are exploring hedging and forward-cover mechanisms to manage margin volatility. Overlaid on these commercial adjustments are regulatory compliance obligations and documentation complexities that add administrative burden to cross-border transactions. Collectively, these developments reinforce the need for scenario-based planning that integrates tariff risk into procurement, capital allocation, and contract design decisions.
A granular segmentation-driven perspective linking production pathways, feedstock choices, derivative specializations, distribution channels, and end-use demands to strategic priorities
Understanding segmentation is essential to interpreting how value is created and captured across the ethylene ecosystem. Based on Derivative Type, the landscape spans Alpha Olefins, Ethylene Dichloride, Ethylene Oxide, and Polyethylene, each serving distinct downstream applications and commanding different quality and processing requirements. Differences among these derivatives influence catalysts, purification steps, and polymerization capacity planning, requiring producers to tailor asset configurations and commercial approaches to derivative-specific demand profiles. Based on Production Process, the market is studied across Catalytic Cracking, Methanol-to-Olefins, and Steam Cracking, with Steam Cracking further examined through Ethane Cracking, Light Naphtha Cracking, and Propane Cracking; the choice of process pathway informs capital intensity, feedstock flexibility, and emissions footprint and therefore shapes project viability and retrofit potential.
Based on Feedstocks, assessment spans Bioethanol, Butane, Ethane, Liquefied Petroleum Gas, Naphtha, and Propane, reflecting how availability, price volatility, and sustainability criteria drive feedstock strategy. Feedstock selection impacts operational continuity, co-product streams, and the feasibility of integrating lower-carbon inputs. Based on Distribution Channel, the study differentiates Direct Sales and Online Platforms, with Online Platforms further explored through Company Portals and E-Commerce Marketplaces; distribution choices affect margin structure, customer engagement models, and service levels, especially for specialty grades and smaller-volume transactions. Finally, based on End Use Industry, the analysis covers Agriculture, Automotive, Chemical, Construction, Consumer Goods, Electronics, Packaging, and Textile sectors, recognizing that application-specific performance requirements and regulatory drivers create differentiated demand patterns and innovation pathways. Together, these segmentation lenses enable stakeholders to align asset strategy, commercial focus, and R&D priorities with evolving market realities.
How distinct regional endowments, regulatory regimes, and demand compositions are determining capacity placement, commercial strategies, and resilience planning across global markets
Regional dynamics exert powerful influence over competitive advantage in ethylene production, distribution, and derivative manufacturing. In the Americas, abundant light hydrocarbons and established petrochemical clusters support a range of steam-cracking configurations and integrated downstream facilities, fostering economies of scale and supply chain depth. Investment trends in the region are shaped by feedstock economics, midstream capacity expansions, and proximity to major polymer-consuming industries. In parallel, Europe, Middle East & Africa present a diverse set of conditions where regulatory frameworks, fiscal incentives, and access to export markets create differentiated opportunities; the Middle East remains focused on leveraging hydrocarbon advantages and petrochemical integration, while Europe emphasizes decarbonization, circularity, and higher-value specialty chemistries.
Across Asia-Pacific, demand growth for packaging, electronics, and consumer goods continues to drive consumption of ethylene-derived products, while investments in new capacity and technological upgrades respond to both domestic needs and export ambitions. Supply chain resiliency concerns and regional trade policies influence how companies prioritize local versus imported feedstocks and finished products. Taken together, these regions demonstrate how resource endowments, regulatory priorities, and demand-side composition interact to define where capacity is added, how assets are configured, and which commercial strategies are most effective for capturing value in different markets.
Competitive positioning and partnership dynamics among integrated producers, regional operators, and technology licensors shaping value capture and innovation pathways
The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of integrated petrochemical majors, regional producers, and technology-focused operators, each pursuing strategies that range from scale-driven commodity production to niche specialization. Leading industrial players prioritize integrated value-chain approaches that secure feedstock supply, optimize cracker operations, and capture downstream margin through derivative and polymer offerings. Meanwhile, regional champions increasingly focus on agility, operational efficiency, and strategic partnerships that enable participation in fast-growing end markets without necessitating full vertical integration.
Technology providers and licensors play a catalytic role by supplying advanced cracking technologies, catalyst formulations, and digital solutions for process optimization and emissions monitoring. Collaborative relationships between producers and end users are becoming more common, with offtake agreements, co-investment in circularity initiatives, and joint innovation projects aligning incentives across the value chain. For investors and corporate strategists, assessing company positioning requires scrutiny of asset flexibility, feedstock diversification, decarbonization pathways, and commercial channels that enhance access to high-growth applications such as electronics-grade polymers and lightweighting solutions for transportation.
Practical strategic imperatives for leadership to strengthen resilience, pursue decarbonization, and realign commercial models for sustained competitiveness
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of actionable steps that enhance resilience, unlock value, and align operations with evolving sustainability and market demands. First, strategic feedstock diversification should be pursued to reduce exposure to single-source volatility while enabling access to lower-carbon inputs; this includes evaluating contractual frameworks, storage, and blending capabilities to maintain operational flexibility. Second, investments in process optimization and retrofit technologies can deliver energy efficiency gains and emissions reductions, supporting compliance with regulatory expectations and corporate commitments. Third, revising commercial models to incorporate flexible offtakes, blended pricing mechanisms, and closer collaboration with downstream customers will help stabilize volumes and margins under shifting trade conditions.
In parallel, companies should systematically evaluate opportunities for vertical collaboration that secure derivative market access and accelerate innovation in specialty products. Embedding advanced analytics and digital twinning into operations will improve decision velocity across maintenance, yield optimization, and logistics planning. Finally, establishing clear metrics for circularity and lifecycle impacts, and incorporating those metrics into procurement and product development decisions, will position firms to meet buyer expectations and regulatory requirements, enhancing long-term competitiveness.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining expert interviews, technical benchmarking, and scenario analysis to underpin strategic recommendations and insights
The research underpinning this executive summary synthesizes primary and secondary sources, technical literature, and expert consultation to deliver a comprehensive view of ethylene-related dynamics. Primary inputs include interviews with industry executives, plant operations managers, and technology vendors, complemented by site-level observations and process performance assessments. Secondary sources span regulatory filings, patent disclosures, technical standards, and peer-reviewed engineering studies that provide the technical foundation for evaluating production pathways, catalyst performance, and emissions mitigation options.
Analytical methods combine qualitative scenario planning with quantitative process benchmarking to assess operational trade-offs, retrofit prospects, and pathway-dependent emissions profiles. Cross-validation was conducted through triangulation of interview insights, published technical data, and observed plant performance metrics to ensure robustness. Segmentation frameworks were applied to align findings with derivative-specific requirements, feedstock variability, distribution channels, and end-use industry characteristics, thereby enabling practical recommendations that reflect both technical feasibility and commercial realities.
Synthesis of technical and commercial signals that identifies practical pathways for companies to secure advantage amid evolving operational and policy environments
This analysis synthesizes complex technical, commercial, and policy signals to provide stakeholders with a coherent view of where strategic advantage will emerge in the ethylene value chain. The interplay of feedstock choices, production pathway selection, and evolving end-use requirements creates differentiated risk-reward profiles across regions and applications. Companies that align operational flexibility with targeted product development, that invest in emissions-reduction and process optimization, and that adapt commercial terms to manage trade-related uncertainties will be better positioned to capitalize on emerging opportunities.
Ultimately, the most successful organizations will be those that integrate technical excellence with agile commercial strategies and purposeful sustainability commitments. By doing so, they can navigate tariff-induced disruptions, leverage regional strengths, and participate in structural shifts toward higher-value derivatives and circular material flows. The insights presented here are designed to inform immediate tactical choices and longer-term strategic planning across procurement, operations, and corporate development teams.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing demand for ethylene in agricultural chemicals to improve crop yields
- 5.2. Emerging applications of ethylene in sustainable packaging solutions across industries
- 5.3. Increasing utilization of ethylene-based agrochemicals to support global food security initiatives
- 5.4. Increasing investments in ethylene production capacity to meet future industrial demand
- 5.5. Development of new catalytic technologies to enhance ethylene production sustainability
- 5.6. Integration of digital technologies in ethylene manufacturing for improved efficiency
- 5.7. Innovations in ethylene derivatives to enhance the cosmetics and personal care sectors
- 5.8. Evolving environmental regulations impacting ethylene production processes
- 5.9. Expansion of ethylene derivative applications in packaging and construction materials
- 5.10. Rising demand for ethylene fueled by expanding plastics production and automotive industries
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Ethylene Market, by Derivative Type
- 8.1. Alpha Olefins
- 8.2. Ethylene Dichloride
- 8.3. Ethylene Oxide
- 8.4. Polyethylene
- 9. Ethylene Market, by Production Process
- 9.1. Catalytic Cracking
- 9.2. Methanol-to-Olefins
- 9.3. Steam Cracking
- 9.3.1. Ethane Cracking
- 9.3.2. Light Naphtha Cracking
- 9.3.3. Propane Cracking
- 10. Ethylene Market, by Feedstocks
- 10.1. Bioethanol
- 10.2. Butane
- 10.3. Ethane
- 10.4. Liquefied Petroleum Gas
- 10.5. Naphtha
- 10.6. Propane
- 11. Ethylene Market, by End Use Industry
- 11.1. Agriculture
- 11.2. Automotive
- 11.3. Chemical
- 11.4. Construction
- 11.5. Consumer Goods
- 11.6. Electronics
- 11.7. Packaging
- 11.8. Textile
- 12. Ethylene Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Direct Sales
- 12.2. Online Platforms
- 12.2.1. Company Portals
- 12.2.2. E-Commerce Marketplaces
- 13. Ethylene Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Ethylene Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Ethylene Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. BASF SE
- 16.3.2. Borealis AG
- 16.3.3. Braskem SA
- 16.3.4. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company
- 16.3.5. China Petrochemical Corporation
- 16.3.6. Evonik Industries AG
- 16.3.7. Exxon Mobil Corporation
- 16.3.8. Formosa Plastics Corporation
- 16.3.9. Haldia Petrochemicals Limited
- 16.3.10. Hanwha Corporation
- 16.3.11. Kavian Petrochemical Corporation by Bakhtar Petrochemical Company
- 16.3.12. L'AIR LIQUIDE S.A
- 16.3.13. LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
- 16.3.14. Merck KGaA
- 16.3.15. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
- 16.3.16. Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
- 16.3.17. PTT Public Company Limited
- 16.3.18. Reliance Industries Limited
- 16.3.19. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- 16.3.20. Shell PLC
- 16.3.21. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.22. Sumitomo Chemical Company
- 16.3.23. The Dow Chemical Company
- 16.3.24. Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
