Enterprise eLearning Market by Deployment Type (Cloud, On Premises), Component (Services, Solution), Learning Type, Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Enterprise eLearning Market was valued at USD 165.71 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 185.91 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 13.69%, reaching USD 462.82 billion by 2032.
An authoritative framing of the contemporary enterprise learning environment that clarifies strategic priorities, operational constraints, and decision-making imperatives for leaders
The contemporary enterprise learning landscape is undergoing a structural evolution driven by rapid technology adoption, demographic shifts in the workforce, and heightened expectations for measurable learning outcomes.
This introduction frames the context for executives and senior stakeholders who must reconcile talent development agendas with digital transformation imperatives. It foregrounds the critical intersections of platform modernization, content strategy, and learner experience design, while acknowledging organizational constraints such as legacy infrastructure, compliance demands, and budgetary discipline. In doing so, it establishes the scope for the analysis that follows: to explain how new delivery modalities and service models reshape procurement, implementation, and governance of enterprise learning solutions.
Readers will find concise evidence-based perspectives on the forces reshaping decision criteria, along with an orientation to how segmentation and regional dynamics influence vendor selection and deployment approaches. The aim is to provide leaders with a strategic starting point for prioritizing investments and aligning stakeholders around realistic, high-impact learning initiatives.
How platform modernization, outcome-focused commercial models, and evolving learner expectations are collectively reshaping enterprise learning strategies and supplier ecosystems
Enterprise learning no longer operates as a discrete HR activity; it sits at the nexus of talent mobility, operational resilience, and customer-centric performance improvement.
Transformative shifts are apparent across technological, pedagogical, and commercial dimensions. Technologically, migration to cloud-native architectures, the maturation of learning platforms, and sophisticated integration with HR systems allow organizations to centralize governance while delivering personalized experiences. Pedagogically, microlearning, blended modalities, and competency-based approaches are becoming default design patterns, and analytics now inform continuous curriculum refinement. Commercially, buyers are shifting from transactional software purchases to outcome-oriented engagements that combine solutions and services, creating new contracting models such as subscription bundles and success-based fees.
Moreover, workforce expectations and regulatory complexity are accelerating demand for scalable compliance training, upskilling pathways, and just-in-time learning. These shifts force vendors and buyers alike to re-evaluate product roadmaps, implementation practices, and partnership models to remain relevant in environments that prize speed, measurability, and learner engagement.
Understanding the multifaceted operational and procurement repercussions of US tariff adjustments and how procurement teams should adjust supplier and architectural strategies
Policy changes in international trade, particularly tariff adjustments enacted in the United States in 2025, have introduced a layer of complexity for procurement and supply chains that support enterprise learning ecosystems.
These tariffs affect hardware procurement for on-premises deployments and the cost base of integrated third-party components, which in turn influences total cost of ownership calculations used by procurement teams. As a result, buyers are reassessing the balance between cloud and on-premises architectures to optimize capital outlays and operational agility. Vendors with diversified production footprints and resilient supply chain strategies are better positioned to mitigate cost shocks, while service providers are adjusting engagement models to absorb or pass through incremental charges in a way that preserves competitive value propositions.
In addition, organizations increasingly prioritize vendor partnerships that demonstrate supply chain transparency and contractual flexibility. This trend reinforces migration to cloud-first architectures where operational expenditures can be managed more predictably, and it accelerates interest in modular, interoperable solutions that reduce dependency on geographically concentrated hardware sourcing. Taken together, these dynamics are prompting procurement teams to incorporate tariff risk into vendor selection criteria and contract negotiation strategies.
A multilayered segmentation framework that clarifies buyer priorities and solution fit by deployment model, organizational scale, component architecture, learning modality, and regulated verticals
A robust segmentation framework reveals how buyer needs vary by deployment orientation, organizational scale, component composition, learning modality, and industry verticals.
Based on Deployment Type, the market is studied across Cloud and On Premises, with Cloud further differentiated into Hybrid Cloud, Private Cloud, and Public Cloud, capturing distinct governance, security, and scalability preferences. Based on Organization Size, distinctions among Large Enterprises, Midsize Enterprises, and Small Enterprises illuminate divergent budget cycles, procurement sophistication, and internal capability to manage complex integrations. Based on Component, the ecosystem separates Services and Solution; Services encompass Consulting, Implementation & Integration, and Support & Maintenance, while Consulting splits into Strategy Consulting and Technical Consulting, and Solution includes Assessment & Simulation Tools, Authoring Tools, Learning Content Management Systems, and Learning Management Systems, each addressing different lifecycle stages of learning solution delivery. Based on Learning Type, modalities such as Asynchronous E Learning, Gamification, Mobile Learning, Social Learning, and Virtual Classroom are further sub-segmented to reflect learner preferences and device usage patterns, with Asynchronous E Learning including Microlearning and Self Paced E Learning, Mobile Learning differentiating Smartphone Learning and Tablet Learning, and Virtual Classroom comprising Web Conferencing Tools and Webinar Platforms. Based on Vertical, industry contexts such as BFSI, Healthcare & Life Sciences, IT & Telecom, Manufacturing, and Retail & Consumer Goods are examined, with Healthcare & Life Sciences broken down into Hospitals and Pharmaceuticals to account for acute regulatory and clinical training requirements.
This layered segmentation supports precise solution design and procurement approaches, allowing decision-makers to map capabilities against business priorities and compliance regimes, and to prioritize investments that deliver immediate operational value while enabling future scalability.
How regional regulatory regimes, language diversity, and device adoption rates distinctly influence procurement priorities and deployment strategies across global markets
Regional dynamics shape buyer expectations, regulatory obligations, and the pace at which new learning modalities gain traction across enterprise customers.
In the Americas, organizations often lead with cloud adoption and emphasize integration with talent platforms and analytics to support large, distributed workforces. Meanwhile, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape in which data protection regimes, multilingual requirements, and regional compliance frameworks drive demand for configurable, privacy-aware solutions and local content adaptation. In Asia-Pacific, rapid digital adoption, mobile-first learner populations, and a competitive vendor ecosystem favor scalable cloud services and mobile learning approaches that accommodate high volumes and varied device profiles.
These regional profiles influence go-to-market strategies for vendors, as well as deployment decisions for buyers who must weigh localization, language support, and regional partner capabilities. Consequently, organizations pursuing global rollouts should design governance models that reconcile central standards with local flexibility, and they should select partners that demonstrate regional delivery capacity alongside a coherent product roadmap.
Insights into vendor differentiation strategies showing why openness, integration, and outcome-driven services decide long-term enterprise partnerships and procurement choices
Competitive dynamics among solution providers and service firms center on product extensibility, integration depth, and outcome-oriented service portfolios.
Leading companies differentiate through platform interoperability, robust APIs, and modular architectures that enable rapid integration with HR systems, content providers, and analytics engines. Conversely, firms that rely on closed architectures risk narrower adoption among enterprise clients seeking flexibility and long-term cost predictability. Service providers that combine strategy consulting with technical delivery capabilities create compelling propositions for complex digital transformation projects, while pure-play vendors that invest in pre-built content libraries and assessment tools can accelerate time-to-value for specific use cases such as compliance and skill certification.
Strategic partnerships, channel expansion, and targeted acquisitions remain primary routes for capability expansion. Observing vendor behavior, buyers should prioritize partners that demonstrate a balanced investment in platform reliability, learner experience design, and measurable learning outcomes. In negotiations, emphasis should fall on contractual provisions for service levels, data portability, and roadmaps tied to interoperability and standards compliance.
Actionable guidance for executives to align procurement, architecture, and performance measurement so learning investments directly support workforce capability and operational goals
Leaders must adopt pragmatic actions that connect strategic intent with operational execution to realize measurable learning outcomes and sustain competitive advantage.
First, prioritize architectures that balance central governance with local adaptability, enabling consistent compliance while allowing regional teams to tailor content and delivery to local needs. Next, align procurement and HR functions around total value considerations that include implementation complexity, integration costs, and ongoing support commitments rather than solely license fees. Additionally, invest in analytics and capability measurement frameworks to translate learning activity into performance metrics that inform continuous improvement and justify further investment. Furthermore, favor vendor partners that offer modular solutions and clear APIs to reduce vendor lock-in and maintain flexibility as business needs evolve. Finally, establish a phased rollout approach that starts with high-impact pilots to validate assumptions, gather user feedback, and iterate before scaling globally.
Collectively, these actions reduce deployment risk, accelerate adoption, and ensure that learning investments map directly to strategic workforce outcomes.
A transparent, reproducible multi-method research design combining primary interviews, secondary documentation, and thematic analysis to support actionable, vendor-agnostic conclusions
The research approach rests on a multi-method design that emphasizes triangulation, transparency, and practical relevance for enterprise decision-makers.
Primary research included structured interviews and workshops with senior procurement leaders, learning and development heads, IT architects, and vendor executives to capture real-world challenges and solution criteria. Secondary research synthesized publicly available technical documentation, regulatory guidance, vendor whitepapers, and product release notes to contextualize market developments and product roadmaps. Qualitative insights were validated through cross-industry comparisons and scenario testing to ensure applicability across diverse organizational contexts.
Analytical methods combined thematic analysis of interview data with capability mapping and use-case alignment to produce actionable segmentation and vendor-agnostic recommendations. Throughout the process, attention to data integrity and reproducibility guided sampling and documentation practices, enabling buyers to understand the evidentiary basis for key conclusions and to adapt findings to their own procurement frameworks.
A concise synthesis that distills strategic priorities and operational actions to ensure learning investments convert into demonstrable workforce capability and performance gains
The conclusion consolidates the analysis into a clear imperative for leaders: prioritize modular, interoperable learning architectures and align procurement with outcome-based metrics to unlock strategic value.
Synthesis across deployment types, organizational sizes, components, learning modalities, regional dynamics, and vendor strategies highlights consistent themes: the premium on flexibility, the need for measurable performance linkage, and the advantage conferred to partners who combine technical delivery with strategic advisory capabilities. By integrating these insights into procurement frameworks and deployment roadmaps, organizations can reduce risk, enhance adoption, and accelerate the translation of learning investments into workforce capability gains. Looking forward, success will hinge on governance models that reconcile central standards with local adaptability and on vendor relationships governed by clear service-level commitments and data portability provisions.
In short, leaders who act decisively to re-align architecture, measurement, and vendor selection will secure durable advantages in talent agility and operational performance.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative framing of the contemporary enterprise learning environment that clarifies strategic priorities, operational constraints, and decision-making imperatives for leaders
The contemporary enterprise learning landscape is undergoing a structural evolution driven by rapid technology adoption, demographic shifts in the workforce, and heightened expectations for measurable learning outcomes.
This introduction frames the context for executives and senior stakeholders who must reconcile talent development agendas with digital transformation imperatives. It foregrounds the critical intersections of platform modernization, content strategy, and learner experience design, while acknowledging organizational constraints such as legacy infrastructure, compliance demands, and budgetary discipline. In doing so, it establishes the scope for the analysis that follows: to explain how new delivery modalities and service models reshape procurement, implementation, and governance of enterprise learning solutions.
Readers will find concise evidence-based perspectives on the forces reshaping decision criteria, along with an orientation to how segmentation and regional dynamics influence vendor selection and deployment approaches. The aim is to provide leaders with a strategic starting point for prioritizing investments and aligning stakeholders around realistic, high-impact learning initiatives.
How platform modernization, outcome-focused commercial models, and evolving learner expectations are collectively reshaping enterprise learning strategies and supplier ecosystems
Enterprise learning no longer operates as a discrete HR activity; it sits at the nexus of talent mobility, operational resilience, and customer-centric performance improvement.
Transformative shifts are apparent across technological, pedagogical, and commercial dimensions. Technologically, migration to cloud-native architectures, the maturation of learning platforms, and sophisticated integration with HR systems allow organizations to centralize governance while delivering personalized experiences. Pedagogically, microlearning, blended modalities, and competency-based approaches are becoming default design patterns, and analytics now inform continuous curriculum refinement. Commercially, buyers are shifting from transactional software purchases to outcome-oriented engagements that combine solutions and services, creating new contracting models such as subscription bundles and success-based fees.
Moreover, workforce expectations and regulatory complexity are accelerating demand for scalable compliance training, upskilling pathways, and just-in-time learning. These shifts force vendors and buyers alike to re-evaluate product roadmaps, implementation practices, and partnership models to remain relevant in environments that prize speed, measurability, and learner engagement.
Understanding the multifaceted operational and procurement repercussions of US tariff adjustments and how procurement teams should adjust supplier and architectural strategies
Policy changes in international trade, particularly tariff adjustments enacted in the United States in 2025, have introduced a layer of complexity for procurement and supply chains that support enterprise learning ecosystems.
These tariffs affect hardware procurement for on-premises deployments and the cost base of integrated third-party components, which in turn influences total cost of ownership calculations used by procurement teams. As a result, buyers are reassessing the balance between cloud and on-premises architectures to optimize capital outlays and operational agility. Vendors with diversified production footprints and resilient supply chain strategies are better positioned to mitigate cost shocks, while service providers are adjusting engagement models to absorb or pass through incremental charges in a way that preserves competitive value propositions.
In addition, organizations increasingly prioritize vendor partnerships that demonstrate supply chain transparency and contractual flexibility. This trend reinforces migration to cloud-first architectures where operational expenditures can be managed more predictably, and it accelerates interest in modular, interoperable solutions that reduce dependency on geographically concentrated hardware sourcing. Taken together, these dynamics are prompting procurement teams to incorporate tariff risk into vendor selection criteria and contract negotiation strategies.
A multilayered segmentation framework that clarifies buyer priorities and solution fit by deployment model, organizational scale, component architecture, learning modality, and regulated verticals
A robust segmentation framework reveals how buyer needs vary by deployment orientation, organizational scale, component composition, learning modality, and industry verticals.
Based on Deployment Type, the market is studied across Cloud and On Premises, with Cloud further differentiated into Hybrid Cloud, Private Cloud, and Public Cloud, capturing distinct governance, security, and scalability preferences. Based on Organization Size, distinctions among Large Enterprises, Midsize Enterprises, and Small Enterprises illuminate divergent budget cycles, procurement sophistication, and internal capability to manage complex integrations. Based on Component, the ecosystem separates Services and Solution; Services encompass Consulting, Implementation & Integration, and Support & Maintenance, while Consulting splits into Strategy Consulting and Technical Consulting, and Solution includes Assessment & Simulation Tools, Authoring Tools, Learning Content Management Systems, and Learning Management Systems, each addressing different lifecycle stages of learning solution delivery. Based on Learning Type, modalities such as Asynchronous E Learning, Gamification, Mobile Learning, Social Learning, and Virtual Classroom are further sub-segmented to reflect learner preferences and device usage patterns, with Asynchronous E Learning including Microlearning and Self Paced E Learning, Mobile Learning differentiating Smartphone Learning and Tablet Learning, and Virtual Classroom comprising Web Conferencing Tools and Webinar Platforms. Based on Vertical, industry contexts such as BFSI, Healthcare & Life Sciences, IT & Telecom, Manufacturing, and Retail & Consumer Goods are examined, with Healthcare & Life Sciences broken down into Hospitals and Pharmaceuticals to account for acute regulatory and clinical training requirements.
This layered segmentation supports precise solution design and procurement approaches, allowing decision-makers to map capabilities against business priorities and compliance regimes, and to prioritize investments that deliver immediate operational value while enabling future scalability.
How regional regulatory regimes, language diversity, and device adoption rates distinctly influence procurement priorities and deployment strategies across global markets
Regional dynamics shape buyer expectations, regulatory obligations, and the pace at which new learning modalities gain traction across enterprise customers.
In the Americas, organizations often lead with cloud adoption and emphasize integration with talent platforms and analytics to support large, distributed workforces. Meanwhile, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape in which data protection regimes, multilingual requirements, and regional compliance frameworks drive demand for configurable, privacy-aware solutions and local content adaptation. In Asia-Pacific, rapid digital adoption, mobile-first learner populations, and a competitive vendor ecosystem favor scalable cloud services and mobile learning approaches that accommodate high volumes and varied device profiles.
These regional profiles influence go-to-market strategies for vendors, as well as deployment decisions for buyers who must weigh localization, language support, and regional partner capabilities. Consequently, organizations pursuing global rollouts should design governance models that reconcile central standards with local flexibility, and they should select partners that demonstrate regional delivery capacity alongside a coherent product roadmap.
Insights into vendor differentiation strategies showing why openness, integration, and outcome-driven services decide long-term enterprise partnerships and procurement choices
Competitive dynamics among solution providers and service firms center on product extensibility, integration depth, and outcome-oriented service portfolios.
Leading companies differentiate through platform interoperability, robust APIs, and modular architectures that enable rapid integration with HR systems, content providers, and analytics engines. Conversely, firms that rely on closed architectures risk narrower adoption among enterprise clients seeking flexibility and long-term cost predictability. Service providers that combine strategy consulting with technical delivery capabilities create compelling propositions for complex digital transformation projects, while pure-play vendors that invest in pre-built content libraries and assessment tools can accelerate time-to-value for specific use cases such as compliance and skill certification.
Strategic partnerships, channel expansion, and targeted acquisitions remain primary routes for capability expansion. Observing vendor behavior, buyers should prioritize partners that demonstrate a balanced investment in platform reliability, learner experience design, and measurable learning outcomes. In negotiations, emphasis should fall on contractual provisions for service levels, data portability, and roadmaps tied to interoperability and standards compliance.
Actionable guidance for executives to align procurement, architecture, and performance measurement so learning investments directly support workforce capability and operational goals
Leaders must adopt pragmatic actions that connect strategic intent with operational execution to realize measurable learning outcomes and sustain competitive advantage.
First, prioritize architectures that balance central governance with local adaptability, enabling consistent compliance while allowing regional teams to tailor content and delivery to local needs. Next, align procurement and HR functions around total value considerations that include implementation complexity, integration costs, and ongoing support commitments rather than solely license fees. Additionally, invest in analytics and capability measurement frameworks to translate learning activity into performance metrics that inform continuous improvement and justify further investment. Furthermore, favor vendor partners that offer modular solutions and clear APIs to reduce vendor lock-in and maintain flexibility as business needs evolve. Finally, establish a phased rollout approach that starts with high-impact pilots to validate assumptions, gather user feedback, and iterate before scaling globally.
Collectively, these actions reduce deployment risk, accelerate adoption, and ensure that learning investments map directly to strategic workforce outcomes.
A transparent, reproducible multi-method research design combining primary interviews, secondary documentation, and thematic analysis to support actionable, vendor-agnostic conclusions
The research approach rests on a multi-method design that emphasizes triangulation, transparency, and practical relevance for enterprise decision-makers.
Primary research included structured interviews and workshops with senior procurement leaders, learning and development heads, IT architects, and vendor executives to capture real-world challenges and solution criteria. Secondary research synthesized publicly available technical documentation, regulatory guidance, vendor whitepapers, and product release notes to contextualize market developments and product roadmaps. Qualitative insights were validated through cross-industry comparisons and scenario testing to ensure applicability across diverse organizational contexts.
Analytical methods combined thematic analysis of interview data with capability mapping and use-case alignment to produce actionable segmentation and vendor-agnostic recommendations. Throughout the process, attention to data integrity and reproducibility guided sampling and documentation practices, enabling buyers to understand the evidentiary basis for key conclusions and to adapt findings to their own procurement frameworks.
A concise synthesis that distills strategic priorities and operational actions to ensure learning investments convert into demonstrable workforce capability and performance gains
The conclusion consolidates the analysis into a clear imperative for leaders: prioritize modular, interoperable learning architectures and align procurement with outcome-based metrics to unlock strategic value.
Synthesis across deployment types, organizational sizes, components, learning modalities, regional dynamics, and vendor strategies highlights consistent themes: the premium on flexibility, the need for measurable performance linkage, and the advantage conferred to partners who combine technical delivery with strategic advisory capabilities. By integrating these insights into procurement frameworks and deployment roadmaps, organizations can reduce risk, enhance adoption, and accelerate the translation of learning investments into workforce capability gains. Looking forward, success will hinge on governance models that reconcile central standards with local adaptability and on vendor relationships governed by clear service-level commitments and data portability provisions.
In short, leaders who act decisively to re-align architecture, measurement, and vendor selection will secure durable advantages in talent agility and operational performance.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
195 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence for personalized adaptive learning paths and performance analytics
- 5.2. Deployment of gamified microlearning modules to improve learner engagement and knowledge retention
- 5.3. Expansion of virtual reality and augmented reality simulations for immersive corporate training experiences
- 5.4. Adoption of mobile-first eLearning platforms with offline access for field-based workforce training
- 5.5. Implementation of learning experience platforms integrating social collaboration and peer feedback features
- 5.6. Utilization of data analytics dashboards to monitor course effectiveness and learner competency progression
- 5.7. Incorporation of adaptive assessments driven by real-time performance data for continuous skill evaluation
- 5.8. Shift towards subscription-based learning libraries offering on-demand bite-sized courses and certification tracks
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Enterprise eLearning Market, by Deployment Type
- 8.1. Cloud
- 8.1.1. Hybrid Cloud
- 8.1.2. Private Cloud
- 8.1.3. Public Cloud
- 8.2. On Premises
- 9. Enterprise eLearning Market, by Component
- 9.1. Services
- 9.1.1. Consulting
- 9.1.1.1. Strategy Consulting
- 9.1.1.2. Technical Consulting
- 9.1.2. Implementation & Integration
- 9.1.3. Support & Maintenance
- 9.2. Solution
- 9.2.1. Assessment & Simulation Tool
- 9.2.2. Authoring Tool
- 9.2.3. Learning Content Management System
- 9.2.4. Learning Management System
- 10. Enterprise eLearning Market, by Learning Type
- 10.1. Asynchronous E Learning
- 10.1.1. Microlearning
- 10.1.2. Self Paced E Learning
- 10.2. Gamification
- 10.3. Mobile Learning
- 10.3.1. Smartphone Learning
- 10.3.2. Tablet Learning
- 10.4. Social Learning
- 10.5. Virtual Classroom
- 10.5.1. Web Conferencing Tool
- 10.5.2. Webinar Platform
- 11. Enterprise eLearning Market, by Vertical
- 11.1. BFSI
- 11.2. Healthcare & Life Sciences
- 11.2.1. Hospitals
- 11.2.2. Pharmaceuticals
- 11.3. IT & Telecom
- 11.4. Manufacturing
- 11.5. Retail & Consumer Goods
- 12. Enterprise eLearning Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Enterprise eLearning Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Enterprise eLearning Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Skillsoft Inc.
- 15.3.2. Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.
- 15.3.3. Adobe Inc.
- 15.3.4. SAP SE
- 15.3.5. Oracle Corporation
- 15.3.6. Workday, Inc.
- 15.3.7. Docebo S.p.A.
- 15.3.8. Blackboard Inc.
- 15.3.9. LinkedIn Corporation
- 15.3.10. Udemy, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
