New Energy Vehicle Taxi Market by Powertrain (Battery Electric, Fuel Cell Electric, Hybrid Electric), Charging Mode (Ac Slow Charging, Battery Swap, Dc Fast Charging), Battery Capacity, Driving Range - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The New Energy Vehicle Taxi Market was valued at USD 32.98 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 35.98 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.29%, reaching USD 67.13 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation to the electrified taxi segment that frames operational realities, stakeholder priorities, and the strategic significance of technology and policy interactions
The transition toward electrified taxi fleets is reshaping urban mobility, fleet economics, and public policy frameworks in ways that demand strategic clarity. This executive summary synthesizes the pivotal drivers, structural shifts, and actionable insights relevant to stakeholders across vehicle OEMs, fleet managers, charging infrastructure providers, regulators, and mobility operators. Grounded in primary stakeholder interviews, technical assessments, and policy review, the analysis focuses on how technology, operations, and regulatory regimes converge to redefine taxi service delivery.
The narrative begins by framing the taxi segment as a distinct use case within broader transport electrification because duty cycles, utilization intensity, and infrastructure needs differ markedly from private passenger vehicles. High daily mileage, depot-centric charging opportunities, and predictable routing create both opportunities and constraints for battery and charging strategies. Throughout this summary, emphasis is placed on practical implications for procurement, asset utilization, total cost of operation drivers, and the interoperability of charging and energy management systems so that decision-makers can prioritize investments with a clear view of operational trade-offs.
An integrated view of recent technological advancements, operational adaptations, and regulatory incentives that are jointly accelerating taxi electrification and reshaping incumbent business models
Recent years have produced a cascade of structural shifts that are now converging to transform taxi services at scale. Technology improvements in energy density, charging power electronics, and battery management have narrowed the performance gap between electric and legacy powertrains, which changes fleet operator calculus around vehicle replacement cycles. Meanwhile, software-driven fleet orchestration and telematics now enable dynamic charging schedules and route optimization, effectively turning vehicles into flexible energy assets during off-peak periods and enabling higher utilization without compromising uptime.
On the policy front, incentive and regulatory frameworks have increasingly tilted in favor of lower-emission taxis, influencing procurement priorities for municipal operators and licensed fleets. Investment patterns among infrastructure providers are moving from ad hoc, destination-focused chargers to integrated depot and curb strategies, with an emphasis on interoperability and payment standardization. These shifts are reinforced by a maturing ecosystem of financing and risk-transfer products that address battery residual value and charging infrastructure deployment, thereby unlocking capital for fleet electrification. Collectively, these developments are prompting a re-evaluation of legacy business models within ride-hailing, inclusive of partnerships between mobility platforms and utilities to coordinate demand response and managed charging.
A nuanced assessment of how cumulative tariff actions and trade dynamics are reshaping supply chains, procurement strategies, and manufacturing footprints in the taxi electrification value chain
Tariff measures and trade actions affecting components, complete vehicles, and battery materials have created a more complex operating environment for global supply chains, with implications for procurement sourcing and manufacturing footprint decisions. Existing duties on certain imports and ongoing trade reviews have incentivized some manufacturers to consider localized assembly or vertical integration of battery supply to mitigate exposure to additional levies. These adaptive responses have consequences for lead times, supplier diversification strategies, and the design of commercial contracts where tariffs may shift landed costs unpredictably.
By 2025, the cumulative impact of tariffs must be evaluated in conjunction with domestic policy incentives that promote local sourcing and manufacturing content. Tariff pressure can accelerate nearshoring decisions for components such as power electronics and battery cells, while also motivating strategic partnerships to create tariff-resilient value chains. For fleet operators and procurement agencies, an important implication is the need to incorporate tariff sensitivity into total cost analyses and procurement specifications; procurement windows should include contractual safeguards and contingency clauses to address sudden changes in import duties. Furthermore, tariff-induced upstream shifts are likely to alter supplier competitive dynamics, increasing the strategic importance of long-term supply contracts and collaborative R&D arrangements to sustain technology advantages.
Actionable segmentation-based insights that connect powertrain architectures, charging modalities, battery capacities, and driving range profiles to practical fleet deployment scenarios
Powertrain choices remain foundational to fleet strategy, with the market examined across Battery Electric, Fuel Cell Electric, and Hybrid Electric platforms; within the hybrid category, there is further differentiation between Conventional Hybrid and Plug In Hybrid models reflecting distinct refueling and charging paradigms. These powertrain distinctions carry operational consequences: battery electric vehicles favor depot charging and higher upfront capital allocation for batteries, fuel cell electric vehicles alter fueling logistics toward hydrogen infrastructure and present different refueling speeds, while plug-in hybrids and conventional hybrids provide transitional options that reduce range anxiety at the cost of ongoing liquid fuel dependencies.
Charging modalities are equally consequential and the analysis distinguishes among AC slow charging, battery swap, and DC fast charging; AC slow charging itself is parsed into high power AC slow charging and low power AC slow charging, whereas DC fast charging is separated into high power DC fast charging and medium power DC fast charging to reflect divergent operational use cases. These charging mode distinctions map directly to depot versus curb strategies and influence charger density, energy management systems, and floorplanning for vehicle layovers. Battery capacity segmentation, categorized across the bands of 60 to 100 kWh, above 100 kWh, and below 60 kWh, shapes decisions around expected range, payload implications, and degradation management, and thus influences replacement and warranty structures.
Driving range categories-150 to 300 km, above 300 km, and up to 150 km-help frame suitability for different service patterns; shorter range vehicles may be optimal for dense, short-trip urban circuits with frequent opportunity charging, while long-range variants support extended shifts and minimize en-route charging dependencies. Integrating these segmentation lenses yields a granular view of product-market fit: operators with depot-centric fleets and predictable shift patterns may prioritize higher battery capacities and medium to high power AC slow charging investments, whereas fleets with distributed operations and minimal depot access might emphasize rapid DC fast charging or explore battery swap solutions combined with smaller battery capacities to optimize capital expenditure and turnaround times.
Comparative regional analysis that reveals how policy frameworks, infrastructure readiness, and public procurement strategies create distinct electrification pathways across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics underline that electrification pathways are not uniform; in the Americas, the interplay between federal incentives, state-level regulation, and municipal procurement policies creates a layered adoption pattern that favors early electrification among major metropolitan fleets. Infrastructure investments in depot charging and utility grid modernization are concentrated around high-demand urban corridors, while legacy taxi markets face distinct licensing and retrofitting challenges that require coordinated municipal planning and targeted financing mechanisms. In this context, partnerships between fleet operators and utilities are emerging as a core enabler of scalable charging deployment.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a diverse set of regulatory and market environments where strong emissions standards in European markets and targeted subsidy programs accelerate fleet turnover, while in some Middle Eastern and African markets uneven grid readiness and fuel pricing dynamics shape more incremental adoption. The region’s emphasis on interoperable standards, congestion-zone management, and municipal emissions targets means that taxi electrification is often pursued as part of integrated urban mobility strategies. Asia-Pacific continues to demonstrate rapid adoption in high-density urban centers supported by domestic manufacturing capability, aggressive public procurement, and integrated mobility platforms that align vehicle, charging, and services offerings at scale. Across all regions, local policy design, grid infrastructure readiness, and access to capital remain the principal levers determining the pace and shape of electrification.
A strategic appraisal of how OEMs, component innovators, charging operators, and mobility platforms are forming new competitive and collaborative models to serve high-utilization taxi fleets
Competitive dynamics among manufacturers, component suppliers, charging network operators, and mobility platforms are evolving as incumbents and new entrants position for fleet-specific value propositions. Vehicle OEMs are differentiating through modular battery architectures, telematics-enabled warranties, and certified depot integration programs aimed at minimizing downtime and aligning maintenance cycles with high-utilization taxi fleets. Component suppliers specializing in thermal management, high-efficiency power electronics, and advanced battery chemistries are becoming strategic partners for fleets seeking to optimize lifecycle costs and reliability under heavy daily utilization.
Charging network providers are competing on accessibility, uptime guarantees, and integrated payment and energy management services, often forming alliances with utilities to provide managed charging and demand response capabilities. Mobility platforms and fleet operators are exploring joint procurement and shared-infrastructure models to spread capital costs and accelerate network density in targeted urban clusters. Service providers that combine vehicle-as-a-service offerings with battery lifecycle management and residual value assurance are gaining traction, particularly among smaller operators that lack the scale to absorb technology risk independently. These competitive moves emphasize collaboration across the value chain, where co-investment and long-term supply arrangements reduce execution risk for large-scale electrification programs.
Concrete, multi-stakeholder strategies to align vehicle selection, charging infrastructure, utility partnerships, procurement safeguards, and data-driven operations for sustainable electrification
Industry leaders should prioritize an integrated approach that combines procurement, infrastructure deployment, and operational readiness planning. First, fleet operators must align vehicle selection with realistic duty cycles and maintenance capabilities, ensuring that powertrain and battery specifications match daily range requirements and charging opportunities. Second, stakeholders should pursue flexible charging architectures that accommodate both depot and opportunity charging to maximize availability while minimizing capital intensity; this includes planning for mixed charging speeds and the potential adoption of battery swap where it materially reduces downtime.
Third, strategic partnerships with utilities and energy service providers are essential to manage peak load, implement dynamic pricing, and leverage demand-side flexibility. Fourth, procurement strategies should incorporate contractual protections for tariff exposure and supply chain disruption, including staged manufacturing localization, multi-sourcing, and collaborative R&D agreements to maintain access to key components. Fifth, operators should adopt data-driven fleet management platforms that optimize dispatch, predictive maintenance, and battery degradation modeling to extend asset life and reduce operating risk. Finally, policymakers and municipal leaders should be engaged proactively to design coordinated incentives, curbside policies, and licensing frameworks that enable efficient roll-out of electrified taxi services while ensuring equity and service reliability for urban populations.
A robust mixed-methods research design combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical assessments, depot case studies, and scenario analysis to deliver decision-focused insights
The research approach combined qualitative interviews with fleet managers, OEM product leads, charging infrastructure providers, and policy experts, supplemented by technical reviews of powertrain architectures and charging technologies. Data collection included on-the-ground assessments of depot layouts, charging footprint case studies, and anonymized operational telemetry to validate assumptions about daily utilization, charging windows, and duty cycles. Secondary sources comprised regulatory filings, manufacturer technical specifications, and industry white papers to triangulate findings from primary conversations.
Analytical methods emphasized scenario-based assessment of operational configurations, sensitivity analysis of key cost and performance levers, and supplier mapping to highlight concentration risks. Wherever possible, findings were validated through cross-referencing stakeholder perspectives to ensure that technology readiness, regulatory intent, and logistical constraints were coherently represented. The methodology prioritized actionable intelligence over speculative forecasting, focusing on decision-relevant metrics such as uptime implications, maintenance cadence differences, and infrastructure interoperability considerations.
A concluding synthesis that distills operational priorities, public-private enablers, and pragmatic scaling approaches for reliably transitioning taxi fleets to electric propulsion
Electrifying taxi fleets presents both an operational imperative and a strategic opportunity: operators that anticipate the interaction between vehicle selection, charging strategy, and regulatory conditions will be best positioned to capture efficiency gains and deliver reliable service. Technological advances and ecosystem maturation have resolved many early barriers, but successful scale-up requires disciplined procurement, collaborative infrastructure planning, and active risk management across supply chains. Municipal authorities and utilities play a central enabling role by aligning incentives, streamlining permitting, and investing in grid modernization that supports high-density charging.
The path forward emphasizes pragmatic pilots that validate operational assumptions, iterative scaling that learns from early deployments, and durable partnerships that share risk across manufacturers, infrastructure providers, and mobility platforms. Decisions grounded in operational telemetry and scenario planning will reduce uncertainty and enable stakeholders to convert strategic intent into measurable fleet performance improvements and emissions reductions over time.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to the electrified taxi segment that frames operational realities, stakeholder priorities, and the strategic significance of technology and policy interactions
The transition toward electrified taxi fleets is reshaping urban mobility, fleet economics, and public policy frameworks in ways that demand strategic clarity. This executive summary synthesizes the pivotal drivers, structural shifts, and actionable insights relevant to stakeholders across vehicle OEMs, fleet managers, charging infrastructure providers, regulators, and mobility operators. Grounded in primary stakeholder interviews, technical assessments, and policy review, the analysis focuses on how technology, operations, and regulatory regimes converge to redefine taxi service delivery.
The narrative begins by framing the taxi segment as a distinct use case within broader transport electrification because duty cycles, utilization intensity, and infrastructure needs differ markedly from private passenger vehicles. High daily mileage, depot-centric charging opportunities, and predictable routing create both opportunities and constraints for battery and charging strategies. Throughout this summary, emphasis is placed on practical implications for procurement, asset utilization, total cost of operation drivers, and the interoperability of charging and energy management systems so that decision-makers can prioritize investments with a clear view of operational trade-offs.
An integrated view of recent technological advancements, operational adaptations, and regulatory incentives that are jointly accelerating taxi electrification and reshaping incumbent business models
Recent years have produced a cascade of structural shifts that are now converging to transform taxi services at scale. Technology improvements in energy density, charging power electronics, and battery management have narrowed the performance gap between electric and legacy powertrains, which changes fleet operator calculus around vehicle replacement cycles. Meanwhile, software-driven fleet orchestration and telematics now enable dynamic charging schedules and route optimization, effectively turning vehicles into flexible energy assets during off-peak periods and enabling higher utilization without compromising uptime.
On the policy front, incentive and regulatory frameworks have increasingly tilted in favor of lower-emission taxis, influencing procurement priorities for municipal operators and licensed fleets. Investment patterns among infrastructure providers are moving from ad hoc, destination-focused chargers to integrated depot and curb strategies, with an emphasis on interoperability and payment standardization. These shifts are reinforced by a maturing ecosystem of financing and risk-transfer products that address battery residual value and charging infrastructure deployment, thereby unlocking capital for fleet electrification. Collectively, these developments are prompting a re-evaluation of legacy business models within ride-hailing, inclusive of partnerships between mobility platforms and utilities to coordinate demand response and managed charging.
A nuanced assessment of how cumulative tariff actions and trade dynamics are reshaping supply chains, procurement strategies, and manufacturing footprints in the taxi electrification value chain
Tariff measures and trade actions affecting components, complete vehicles, and battery materials have created a more complex operating environment for global supply chains, with implications for procurement sourcing and manufacturing footprint decisions. Existing duties on certain imports and ongoing trade reviews have incentivized some manufacturers to consider localized assembly or vertical integration of battery supply to mitigate exposure to additional levies. These adaptive responses have consequences for lead times, supplier diversification strategies, and the design of commercial contracts where tariffs may shift landed costs unpredictably.
By 2025, the cumulative impact of tariffs must be evaluated in conjunction with domestic policy incentives that promote local sourcing and manufacturing content. Tariff pressure can accelerate nearshoring decisions for components such as power electronics and battery cells, while also motivating strategic partnerships to create tariff-resilient value chains. For fleet operators and procurement agencies, an important implication is the need to incorporate tariff sensitivity into total cost analyses and procurement specifications; procurement windows should include contractual safeguards and contingency clauses to address sudden changes in import duties. Furthermore, tariff-induced upstream shifts are likely to alter supplier competitive dynamics, increasing the strategic importance of long-term supply contracts and collaborative R&D arrangements to sustain technology advantages.
Actionable segmentation-based insights that connect powertrain architectures, charging modalities, battery capacities, and driving range profiles to practical fleet deployment scenarios
Powertrain choices remain foundational to fleet strategy, with the market examined across Battery Electric, Fuel Cell Electric, and Hybrid Electric platforms; within the hybrid category, there is further differentiation between Conventional Hybrid and Plug In Hybrid models reflecting distinct refueling and charging paradigms. These powertrain distinctions carry operational consequences: battery electric vehicles favor depot charging and higher upfront capital allocation for batteries, fuel cell electric vehicles alter fueling logistics toward hydrogen infrastructure and present different refueling speeds, while plug-in hybrids and conventional hybrids provide transitional options that reduce range anxiety at the cost of ongoing liquid fuel dependencies.
Charging modalities are equally consequential and the analysis distinguishes among AC slow charging, battery swap, and DC fast charging; AC slow charging itself is parsed into high power AC slow charging and low power AC slow charging, whereas DC fast charging is separated into high power DC fast charging and medium power DC fast charging to reflect divergent operational use cases. These charging mode distinctions map directly to depot versus curb strategies and influence charger density, energy management systems, and floorplanning for vehicle layovers. Battery capacity segmentation, categorized across the bands of 60 to 100 kWh, above 100 kWh, and below 60 kWh, shapes decisions around expected range, payload implications, and degradation management, and thus influences replacement and warranty structures.
Driving range categories-150 to 300 km, above 300 km, and up to 150 km-help frame suitability for different service patterns; shorter range vehicles may be optimal for dense, short-trip urban circuits with frequent opportunity charging, while long-range variants support extended shifts and minimize en-route charging dependencies. Integrating these segmentation lenses yields a granular view of product-market fit: operators with depot-centric fleets and predictable shift patterns may prioritize higher battery capacities and medium to high power AC slow charging investments, whereas fleets with distributed operations and minimal depot access might emphasize rapid DC fast charging or explore battery swap solutions combined with smaller battery capacities to optimize capital expenditure and turnaround times.
Comparative regional analysis that reveals how policy frameworks, infrastructure readiness, and public procurement strategies create distinct electrification pathways across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics underline that electrification pathways are not uniform; in the Americas, the interplay between federal incentives, state-level regulation, and municipal procurement policies creates a layered adoption pattern that favors early electrification among major metropolitan fleets. Infrastructure investments in depot charging and utility grid modernization are concentrated around high-demand urban corridors, while legacy taxi markets face distinct licensing and retrofitting challenges that require coordinated municipal planning and targeted financing mechanisms. In this context, partnerships between fleet operators and utilities are emerging as a core enabler of scalable charging deployment.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a diverse set of regulatory and market environments where strong emissions standards in European markets and targeted subsidy programs accelerate fleet turnover, while in some Middle Eastern and African markets uneven grid readiness and fuel pricing dynamics shape more incremental adoption. The region’s emphasis on interoperable standards, congestion-zone management, and municipal emissions targets means that taxi electrification is often pursued as part of integrated urban mobility strategies. Asia-Pacific continues to demonstrate rapid adoption in high-density urban centers supported by domestic manufacturing capability, aggressive public procurement, and integrated mobility platforms that align vehicle, charging, and services offerings at scale. Across all regions, local policy design, grid infrastructure readiness, and access to capital remain the principal levers determining the pace and shape of electrification.
A strategic appraisal of how OEMs, component innovators, charging operators, and mobility platforms are forming new competitive and collaborative models to serve high-utilization taxi fleets
Competitive dynamics among manufacturers, component suppliers, charging network operators, and mobility platforms are evolving as incumbents and new entrants position for fleet-specific value propositions. Vehicle OEMs are differentiating through modular battery architectures, telematics-enabled warranties, and certified depot integration programs aimed at minimizing downtime and aligning maintenance cycles with high-utilization taxi fleets. Component suppliers specializing in thermal management, high-efficiency power electronics, and advanced battery chemistries are becoming strategic partners for fleets seeking to optimize lifecycle costs and reliability under heavy daily utilization.
Charging network providers are competing on accessibility, uptime guarantees, and integrated payment and energy management services, often forming alliances with utilities to provide managed charging and demand response capabilities. Mobility platforms and fleet operators are exploring joint procurement and shared-infrastructure models to spread capital costs and accelerate network density in targeted urban clusters. Service providers that combine vehicle-as-a-service offerings with battery lifecycle management and residual value assurance are gaining traction, particularly among smaller operators that lack the scale to absorb technology risk independently. These competitive moves emphasize collaboration across the value chain, where co-investment and long-term supply arrangements reduce execution risk for large-scale electrification programs.
Concrete, multi-stakeholder strategies to align vehicle selection, charging infrastructure, utility partnerships, procurement safeguards, and data-driven operations for sustainable electrification
Industry leaders should prioritize an integrated approach that combines procurement, infrastructure deployment, and operational readiness planning. First, fleet operators must align vehicle selection with realistic duty cycles and maintenance capabilities, ensuring that powertrain and battery specifications match daily range requirements and charging opportunities. Second, stakeholders should pursue flexible charging architectures that accommodate both depot and opportunity charging to maximize availability while minimizing capital intensity; this includes planning for mixed charging speeds and the potential adoption of battery swap where it materially reduces downtime.
Third, strategic partnerships with utilities and energy service providers are essential to manage peak load, implement dynamic pricing, and leverage demand-side flexibility. Fourth, procurement strategies should incorporate contractual protections for tariff exposure and supply chain disruption, including staged manufacturing localization, multi-sourcing, and collaborative R&D agreements to maintain access to key components. Fifth, operators should adopt data-driven fleet management platforms that optimize dispatch, predictive maintenance, and battery degradation modeling to extend asset life and reduce operating risk. Finally, policymakers and municipal leaders should be engaged proactively to design coordinated incentives, curbside policies, and licensing frameworks that enable efficient roll-out of electrified taxi services while ensuring equity and service reliability for urban populations.
A robust mixed-methods research design combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical assessments, depot case studies, and scenario analysis to deliver decision-focused insights
The research approach combined qualitative interviews with fleet managers, OEM product leads, charging infrastructure providers, and policy experts, supplemented by technical reviews of powertrain architectures and charging technologies. Data collection included on-the-ground assessments of depot layouts, charging footprint case studies, and anonymized operational telemetry to validate assumptions about daily utilization, charging windows, and duty cycles. Secondary sources comprised regulatory filings, manufacturer technical specifications, and industry white papers to triangulate findings from primary conversations.
Analytical methods emphasized scenario-based assessment of operational configurations, sensitivity analysis of key cost and performance levers, and supplier mapping to highlight concentration risks. Wherever possible, findings were validated through cross-referencing stakeholder perspectives to ensure that technology readiness, regulatory intent, and logistical constraints were coherently represented. The methodology prioritized actionable intelligence over speculative forecasting, focusing on decision-relevant metrics such as uptime implications, maintenance cadence differences, and infrastructure interoperability considerations.
A concluding synthesis that distills operational priorities, public-private enablers, and pragmatic scaling approaches for reliably transitioning taxi fleets to electric propulsion
Electrifying taxi fleets presents both an operational imperative and a strategic opportunity: operators that anticipate the interaction between vehicle selection, charging strategy, and regulatory conditions will be best positioned to capture efficiency gains and deliver reliable service. Technological advances and ecosystem maturation have resolved many early barriers, but successful scale-up requires disciplined procurement, collaborative infrastructure planning, and active risk management across supply chains. Municipal authorities and utilities play a central enabling role by aligning incentives, streamlining permitting, and investing in grid modernization that supports high-density charging.
The path forward emphasizes pragmatic pilots that validate operational assumptions, iterative scaling that learns from early deployments, and durable partnerships that share risk across manufacturers, infrastructure providers, and mobility platforms. Decisions grounded in operational telemetry and scenario planning will reduce uncertainty and enable stakeholders to convert strategic intent into measurable fleet performance improvements and emissions reductions over time.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
194 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Government subsidy adjustments driving shifts in electric taxi fleet procurement strategies
- 5.2. Deployment of high speed charging infrastructure influencing EV taxi route optimization
- 5.3. Integration of vehicle to grid technology enabling idle taxi energy monetization
- 5.4. Adoption of advanced telematics platforms improving EV taxi dispatch and maintenance efficiency
- 5.5. Rising competition from ride hailing platforms accelerating electrification of taxi services
- 5.6. Integration of autonomous driving features in NEV taxis transforming urban mobility patterns
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. New Energy Vehicle Taxi Market, by Powertrain
- 8.1. Battery Electric
- 8.2. Fuel Cell Electric
- 8.3. Hybrid Electric
- 8.3.1. Conventional Hybrid
- 8.3.2. Plug In Hybrid
- 9. New Energy Vehicle Taxi Market, by Charging Mode
- 9.1. Ac Slow Charging
- 9.1.1. High Power AC Slow Charging
- 9.1.2. Low Power AC Slow Charging
- 9.2. Battery Swap
- 9.3. Dc Fast Charging
- 9.3.1. High Power DC Fast Charging
- 9.3.2. Medium Power DC Fast Charging
- 10. New Energy Vehicle Taxi Market, by Battery Capacity
- 10.1. 60 To 100 Kwh
- 10.2. Above 100 Kwh
- 10.3. Below 60 Kwh
- 11. New Energy Vehicle Taxi Market, by Driving Range
- 11.1. 150 To 300 Km
- 11.2. Above 300 Km
- 11.3. Up To 150 Km
- 12. New Energy Vehicle Taxi Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. New Energy Vehicle Taxi Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. New Energy Vehicle Taxi Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. BYD Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.2. Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.3. SAIC Motor Corporation Limited
- 15.3.4. BAIC Group Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.5. Changan Automobile Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.6. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.7. SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.8. FAW-Volkswagen Automotive Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.9. Dongfeng Motor Corporation
- 15.3.10. Tesla, Inc.
- 15.3.11. Ford Motor Company
- 15.3.12. Daimler AG
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
