Electronic Funds Transfer Market by Payment Mode (Bank Transfer, Card Based, Mobile Wallet), Transaction Type (Business To Consumer, Consumer To Business, Government To Consumer), Component, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Electronic Funds Transfer Market was valued at USD 81.91 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 90.20 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.90%, reaching USD 174.34 billion by 2032.
A strategic overview of electronic funds transfer dynamics, key drivers, and stakeholder priorities reshaping payments infrastructure and services worldwide
This executive summary frames electronic funds transfer as an essential backbone of modern commerce and public services, encompassing retail payments, corporate settlements, government disbursements, and person-to-person flows. Rapid digitization, the proliferation of mobile connectivity, and rising expectations for speed and transparency have elevated payments from a back-office utility to a strategic differentiator for banks, payment processors, merchants, and technology providers.
Stakeholders must consider three intertwined priorities: resilience of payment rails, customer centricity in user experience design, and alignment with evolving regulatory obligations. The operational imperative is to reduce friction-while strengthening fraud detection and identity verification-so that end users experience faster, safer, and more convenient transactions. At the same time, institutions face pressures to integrate modern software architectures, cloud-native services, and modular APIs that support partnerships with fintech innovators and independent software vendors.
This introduction highlights why leaders should re-evaluate legacy architectures and procurement approaches now. By prioritizing interoperability, scalable security controls, and a clear roadmap for integration, organizations can preserve trust, meet compliance expectations, and unlock new revenue and efficiency opportunities across ecosystems that span consumers, corporates, and government channels.
Technological and regulatory shifts transforming electronic funds transfer ecosystems, accelerating instant settlement, open connectivity and new trust frameworks
The landscape for electronic funds transfer is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology, regulation, and changing user expectations. Real-time settlement capabilities and the normalization of instant payment experiences have redefined what end users perceive as acceptable service levels. Concurrently, open banking initiatives and API-first approaches are facilitating richer integrations between banks, fintechs, and merchants, enabling new value-added features such as reconciling capabilities, contextual offers, and programmable payment flows.
Security paradigms are evolving from perimeter defenses to identity-first models that combine tokenization, biometrics, and behavioral analytics. Cloud migration and platformization of core payment services reduce time to market for innovations while creating fresh considerations for data residency and operational resilience. At the same time, distributed ledger experiments and alternative rails are testing assumptions about settlement finality and cross-border interoperability.
Regulatory frameworks are adapting to these changes, with authorities emphasizing consumer protection, anti-money laundering controls, and operational continuity. Together, these shifts create opportunities for incumbents to modernize and for challengers to capture niche value propositions, but they also raise the bar for collaboration, governance, and the ability to scale securely across geographies and customer segments.
Evaluating how United States tariffs in 2025 reshape electronic funds transfer supply chains, hardware sourcing, and cross-border payment operations
United States tariffs in 2025 introduce a discrete layer of operational and strategic complexity for organizations that depend on global supply chains and hardware-dependent payment interfaces. Tariff measures can increase costs for terminals, card readers, and other point-of-sale devices, prompting procurement teams to revisit supplier contracts, sourcing geographies, and total cost of ownership calculations. In an environment where margin pressure is already influential, these cost impacts can reverberate through device lifecycle planning, warranty arrangements, and upgrade cycles.
Beyond hardware, tariffs can indirectly affect software and services by shifting supplier priorities and component availability. Vendors may prioritize customers based on scale or modify roadmaps to minimize exposure, which influences timelines for firmware updates, security patches, and compatibility enhancements. Cross-border payment operations can become more complex as counterparties adjust pricing models to reflect increased costs, and as regulatory compliance intersects with customs and trade rules.
Strategically, organizations should evaluate diversification of manufacturing and supplier relationships, explore modular hardware designs that tolerate component substitutions, and stress-test contractual terms for supply disruptions. Scenario planning that integrates tariff contingencies with security and compliance plans will enable more resilient operating models while preserving capacity for ongoing modernization of electronic funds transfer infrastructures.
Insights across payment modes, transaction types, channels, components and user segments that reveal demand drivers and adoption behaviors in EFT ecosystems
Granular segmentation reveals meaningful differences in how value is created and captured across payment modes, transaction types, channels, components, and end users. Payment Mode differentiation shows that Bank Transfer remains foundational for high-value and corporate settlements, Card Based transactions-including Credit Card, Debit Card, and Prepaid Card-dominate consumer retail spend and loyalty programs, and Mobile Wallets continue to expand in channels where device-based convenience matters most. These distinctions have implications for authorization flows, reconciliation processes, and fee structures.
Transaction Type nuances underscore that Business To Consumer and Consumer To Business transactions require distinct risk management and take rate approaches, while Government To Consumer disbursements prioritize reliability and auditability. Person To Person activity demands frictionless identity mapping and instant settlement. Channel analysis highlights that Automated Teller Machine networks still play a role in cash access and certain deposit flows, Mobile interfaces have become the primary touchpoint for retail consumers, Online channels drive e-commerce settlement complexity, and Point Of Sale remains central to in-store conversions.
Component insights show that Hardware investments must align with lifecycle and security needs, Services-spanning Implementation And Integration as well as Support And Maintenance-are critical to sustained uptime, and Software platforms enable orchestration, analytics, and risk controls. End User segmentation between Consumer, Corporate, and Government audiences informs pricing, service level design, and compliance posture, guiding where providers should concentrate product and go-to-market effort.
Contrasts across the Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific shaping payments infrastructure, adoption paths, regulatory approaches, and cross-border flow dynamics
Regional contrasts materially shape priorities for infrastructure investment, regulatory compliance, and product design. In the Americas, legacy card networks and bank-led initiatives remain influential alongside rapidly growing mobile and digital wallet adoption; the market dynamic emphasizes interoperability with established banking rails, consumer protection frameworks, and merchant acceptance strategies. North-South dynamics within the region also affect cross-border remittances and corporate treasury optimization.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a diverse regulatory and technological tapestry where open banking and instant payment schemes in parts of Europe coexist with emerging digital payment ecosystems across the Middle East and Africa. Here, compliance complexity and diversity of payment preferences create opportunities for modular solutions that address local needs while enabling cross-border consistency. Regulatory emphasis on regulatory reporting and data protection shapes architectural and operational choices.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by accelerated mobile-first adoption, strong fintech-led innovation, and high penetration of alternative payment methods in several markets. Investment in mobile infrastructure, identity ecosystems, and partnerships with platform providers drives rapid feature adoption. Across these regions, cross-border flows, regulatory alignment, and localized user experience design determine which value propositions will resonate with consumers, corporates, and public-sector operators.
Competitive structures, partnership strategies, and innovation priorities shaping product roadmaps, platform reach and differentiation among payments providers
Competitive dynamics in electronic funds transfer are defined by the interplay between established financial institutions, card networks, payment processors, hardware manufacturers, and agile fintech challengers. Incumbents leverage scale, established trust relationships, and regulatory experience to defend core rails, while challengers focus on nimble product development, niche vertical solutions, and superior digital experiences. Strategic partnerships and platform-based alliances frequently determine market reach and the speed at which new capabilities diffuse.
Companies that prioritize a platform approach-integrating software, services, and hardware interoperability-tend to achieve greater stickiness with enterprise clients and merchants. Meanwhile, vendors that invest in analytics, fraud mitigation, and SDKs for partner integration unlock higher-value engagements. Mergers and acquisitions activity commonly aims to close capability gaps, accelerate time-to-market, or secure distribution channels.
For buyers, vendor selection requires evaluation of long-term product roadmaps, security posture, integration costs, and operational support capacity. Providers that can demonstrate stable, transparent operations, a clear migration path from legacy systems, and a commitment to compliance are positioned to win deals that hinge on reliability as much as innovation.
Strategic recommendations and operational guide for industry leaders to accelerate secure, interoperable and customer centric funds transfer capability
Leaders should pursue a focused set of actions to strengthen competitive positioning and operational resilience. First, prioritize interoperability and API-based integration to enable rapid partner onboarding and reduce time to market for new payment experiences. Second, invest in layered security architectures that combine tokenization, strong customer authentication, and advanced fraud analytics to protect both transactional integrity and customer trust.
Third, diversify supply chains for hardware and critical components to mitigate tariff and geo-political risk, and adopt modular hardware designs where feasible to ease component substitution. Fourth, collaborate proactively with regulators and industry consortia to shape standards that balance innovation with consumer protection, while ensuring internal compliance frameworks remain agile. Fifth, tailor product strategies to distinct segments: design low-friction mobile experiences for consumers, robust reconciliation and liquidity management for corporates, and audited, secure disbursement workflows for government clients.
Finally, enhance decision-making with data analytics and scenario modeling that incorporate operational contingencies, cost shocks, and adoption curves. These combined actions will help organizations deliver superior experiences while maintaining resilience against external shocks and regulatory shifts.
Transparent research methodology outlining primary and secondary approaches, data triangulation, expert validation and quality controls applied to EFT analysis
The research methodology combined a structured mix of primary and secondary approaches, iterative triangulation, and expert validation to ensure findings are robust and actionable. Primary inputs included interviews with payments practitioners, procurement leaders, technology architects, and compliance officers, which provided qualitative context on operational challenges and strategic priorities. Supplementary survey work captured sentiment and feature priorities across representative user groups to inform behavior-driven insights.
Secondary analysis reviewed vendor documentation, industry white papers, regulatory guidance, and technical standards to map capability sets and interoperability constraints. Data triangulation reconciled these sources with primary inputs to resolve discrepancies and identify consistent signals. Expert panels and peer reviews were used to validate conceptual frameworks and to test the plausibility of scenario narratives, while quality controls checked for methodological biases and ensured reproducibility of key observations.
Limitations are acknowledged where rapidly evolving technology or policy shifts could change parameters; the methodology therefore emphasizes transparent assumptions and recommends periodic update cycles. Ethical considerations guided data collection and confidentiality for participant inputs, preserving commercial sensitivities while enabling candid insights.
Concluding strategic priorities for executives to balance resilience, innovation, compliance and cost management within electronic funds transfer operations
The evidence and analysis underscore that electronic funds transfer is at an inflection point where operational resilience, user experience, and regulatory alignment converge to determine competitive advantage. Organizations that modernize architectures, adopt robust security patterns, and invest selectively in partnerships will be better positioned to capture shifting volumes across consumer, corporate, and government segments. At the same time, tariffs, supply chain shifts, and regional regulatory divergence require targeted mitigation strategies and flexible procurement approaches.
Successful programs will blend short-term remediation-such as ramping up fraud detection, securing firmware update processes, and diversifying component suppliers-with medium-term platform investments in APIs, orchestration layers, and analytics capabilities. Leadership alignment and governance structures that prioritize cross-functional decision-making accelerate execution and reduce integration risk.
In conclusion, the path forward emphasizes pragmatic modernization: preserve continuity of core services, accelerate features that matter most to end users, and maintain an adaptive posture to regulatory and economic change. Those actions will enable institutions to sustain trust while unlocking new efficiencies and revenue opportunities across the payments ecosystem.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic overview of electronic funds transfer dynamics, key drivers, and stakeholder priorities reshaping payments infrastructure and services worldwide
This executive summary frames electronic funds transfer as an essential backbone of modern commerce and public services, encompassing retail payments, corporate settlements, government disbursements, and person-to-person flows. Rapid digitization, the proliferation of mobile connectivity, and rising expectations for speed and transparency have elevated payments from a back-office utility to a strategic differentiator for banks, payment processors, merchants, and technology providers.
Stakeholders must consider three intertwined priorities: resilience of payment rails, customer centricity in user experience design, and alignment with evolving regulatory obligations. The operational imperative is to reduce friction-while strengthening fraud detection and identity verification-so that end users experience faster, safer, and more convenient transactions. At the same time, institutions face pressures to integrate modern software architectures, cloud-native services, and modular APIs that support partnerships with fintech innovators and independent software vendors.
This introduction highlights why leaders should re-evaluate legacy architectures and procurement approaches now. By prioritizing interoperability, scalable security controls, and a clear roadmap for integration, organizations can preserve trust, meet compliance expectations, and unlock new revenue and efficiency opportunities across ecosystems that span consumers, corporates, and government channels.
Technological and regulatory shifts transforming electronic funds transfer ecosystems, accelerating instant settlement, open connectivity and new trust frameworks
The landscape for electronic funds transfer is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technology, regulation, and changing user expectations. Real-time settlement capabilities and the normalization of instant payment experiences have redefined what end users perceive as acceptable service levels. Concurrently, open banking initiatives and API-first approaches are facilitating richer integrations between banks, fintechs, and merchants, enabling new value-added features such as reconciling capabilities, contextual offers, and programmable payment flows.
Security paradigms are evolving from perimeter defenses to identity-first models that combine tokenization, biometrics, and behavioral analytics. Cloud migration and platformization of core payment services reduce time to market for innovations while creating fresh considerations for data residency and operational resilience. At the same time, distributed ledger experiments and alternative rails are testing assumptions about settlement finality and cross-border interoperability.
Regulatory frameworks are adapting to these changes, with authorities emphasizing consumer protection, anti-money laundering controls, and operational continuity. Together, these shifts create opportunities for incumbents to modernize and for challengers to capture niche value propositions, but they also raise the bar for collaboration, governance, and the ability to scale securely across geographies and customer segments.
Evaluating how United States tariffs in 2025 reshape electronic funds transfer supply chains, hardware sourcing, and cross-border payment operations
United States tariffs in 2025 introduce a discrete layer of operational and strategic complexity for organizations that depend on global supply chains and hardware-dependent payment interfaces. Tariff measures can increase costs for terminals, card readers, and other point-of-sale devices, prompting procurement teams to revisit supplier contracts, sourcing geographies, and total cost of ownership calculations. In an environment where margin pressure is already influential, these cost impacts can reverberate through device lifecycle planning, warranty arrangements, and upgrade cycles.
Beyond hardware, tariffs can indirectly affect software and services by shifting supplier priorities and component availability. Vendors may prioritize customers based on scale or modify roadmaps to minimize exposure, which influences timelines for firmware updates, security patches, and compatibility enhancements. Cross-border payment operations can become more complex as counterparties adjust pricing models to reflect increased costs, and as regulatory compliance intersects with customs and trade rules.
Strategically, organizations should evaluate diversification of manufacturing and supplier relationships, explore modular hardware designs that tolerate component substitutions, and stress-test contractual terms for supply disruptions. Scenario planning that integrates tariff contingencies with security and compliance plans will enable more resilient operating models while preserving capacity for ongoing modernization of electronic funds transfer infrastructures.
Insights across payment modes, transaction types, channels, components and user segments that reveal demand drivers and adoption behaviors in EFT ecosystems
Granular segmentation reveals meaningful differences in how value is created and captured across payment modes, transaction types, channels, components, and end users. Payment Mode differentiation shows that Bank Transfer remains foundational for high-value and corporate settlements, Card Based transactions-including Credit Card, Debit Card, and Prepaid Card-dominate consumer retail spend and loyalty programs, and Mobile Wallets continue to expand in channels where device-based convenience matters most. These distinctions have implications for authorization flows, reconciliation processes, and fee structures.
Transaction Type nuances underscore that Business To Consumer and Consumer To Business transactions require distinct risk management and take rate approaches, while Government To Consumer disbursements prioritize reliability and auditability. Person To Person activity demands frictionless identity mapping and instant settlement. Channel analysis highlights that Automated Teller Machine networks still play a role in cash access and certain deposit flows, Mobile interfaces have become the primary touchpoint for retail consumers, Online channels drive e-commerce settlement complexity, and Point Of Sale remains central to in-store conversions.
Component insights show that Hardware investments must align with lifecycle and security needs, Services-spanning Implementation And Integration as well as Support And Maintenance-are critical to sustained uptime, and Software platforms enable orchestration, analytics, and risk controls. End User segmentation between Consumer, Corporate, and Government audiences informs pricing, service level design, and compliance posture, guiding where providers should concentrate product and go-to-market effort.
Contrasts across the Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific shaping payments infrastructure, adoption paths, regulatory approaches, and cross-border flow dynamics
Regional contrasts materially shape priorities for infrastructure investment, regulatory compliance, and product design. In the Americas, legacy card networks and bank-led initiatives remain influential alongside rapidly growing mobile and digital wallet adoption; the market dynamic emphasizes interoperability with established banking rails, consumer protection frameworks, and merchant acceptance strategies. North-South dynamics within the region also affect cross-border remittances and corporate treasury optimization.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a diverse regulatory and technological tapestry where open banking and instant payment schemes in parts of Europe coexist with emerging digital payment ecosystems across the Middle East and Africa. Here, compliance complexity and diversity of payment preferences create opportunities for modular solutions that address local needs while enabling cross-border consistency. Regulatory emphasis on regulatory reporting and data protection shapes architectural and operational choices.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by accelerated mobile-first adoption, strong fintech-led innovation, and high penetration of alternative payment methods in several markets. Investment in mobile infrastructure, identity ecosystems, and partnerships with platform providers drives rapid feature adoption. Across these regions, cross-border flows, regulatory alignment, and localized user experience design determine which value propositions will resonate with consumers, corporates, and public-sector operators.
Competitive structures, partnership strategies, and innovation priorities shaping product roadmaps, platform reach and differentiation among payments providers
Competitive dynamics in electronic funds transfer are defined by the interplay between established financial institutions, card networks, payment processors, hardware manufacturers, and agile fintech challengers. Incumbents leverage scale, established trust relationships, and regulatory experience to defend core rails, while challengers focus on nimble product development, niche vertical solutions, and superior digital experiences. Strategic partnerships and platform-based alliances frequently determine market reach and the speed at which new capabilities diffuse.
Companies that prioritize a platform approach-integrating software, services, and hardware interoperability-tend to achieve greater stickiness with enterprise clients and merchants. Meanwhile, vendors that invest in analytics, fraud mitigation, and SDKs for partner integration unlock higher-value engagements. Mergers and acquisitions activity commonly aims to close capability gaps, accelerate time-to-market, or secure distribution channels.
For buyers, vendor selection requires evaluation of long-term product roadmaps, security posture, integration costs, and operational support capacity. Providers that can demonstrate stable, transparent operations, a clear migration path from legacy systems, and a commitment to compliance are positioned to win deals that hinge on reliability as much as innovation.
Strategic recommendations and operational guide for industry leaders to accelerate secure, interoperable and customer centric funds transfer capability
Leaders should pursue a focused set of actions to strengthen competitive positioning and operational resilience. First, prioritize interoperability and API-based integration to enable rapid partner onboarding and reduce time to market for new payment experiences. Second, invest in layered security architectures that combine tokenization, strong customer authentication, and advanced fraud analytics to protect both transactional integrity and customer trust.
Third, diversify supply chains for hardware and critical components to mitigate tariff and geo-political risk, and adopt modular hardware designs where feasible to ease component substitution. Fourth, collaborate proactively with regulators and industry consortia to shape standards that balance innovation with consumer protection, while ensuring internal compliance frameworks remain agile. Fifth, tailor product strategies to distinct segments: design low-friction mobile experiences for consumers, robust reconciliation and liquidity management for corporates, and audited, secure disbursement workflows for government clients.
Finally, enhance decision-making with data analytics and scenario modeling that incorporate operational contingencies, cost shocks, and adoption curves. These combined actions will help organizations deliver superior experiences while maintaining resilience against external shocks and regulatory shifts.
Transparent research methodology outlining primary and secondary approaches, data triangulation, expert validation and quality controls applied to EFT analysis
The research methodology combined a structured mix of primary and secondary approaches, iterative triangulation, and expert validation to ensure findings are robust and actionable. Primary inputs included interviews with payments practitioners, procurement leaders, technology architects, and compliance officers, which provided qualitative context on operational challenges and strategic priorities. Supplementary survey work captured sentiment and feature priorities across representative user groups to inform behavior-driven insights.
Secondary analysis reviewed vendor documentation, industry white papers, regulatory guidance, and technical standards to map capability sets and interoperability constraints. Data triangulation reconciled these sources with primary inputs to resolve discrepancies and identify consistent signals. Expert panels and peer reviews were used to validate conceptual frameworks and to test the plausibility of scenario narratives, while quality controls checked for methodological biases and ensured reproducibility of key observations.
Limitations are acknowledged where rapidly evolving technology or policy shifts could change parameters; the methodology therefore emphasizes transparent assumptions and recommends periodic update cycles. Ethical considerations guided data collection and confidentiality for participant inputs, preserving commercial sensitivities while enabling candid insights.
Concluding strategic priorities for executives to balance resilience, innovation, compliance and cost management within electronic funds transfer operations
The evidence and analysis underscore that electronic funds transfer is at an inflection point where operational resilience, user experience, and regulatory alignment converge to determine competitive advantage. Organizations that modernize architectures, adopt robust security patterns, and invest selectively in partnerships will be better positioned to capture shifting volumes across consumer, corporate, and government segments. At the same time, tariffs, supply chain shifts, and regional regulatory divergence require targeted mitigation strategies and flexible procurement approaches.
Successful programs will blend short-term remediation-such as ramping up fraud detection, securing firmware update processes, and diversifying component suppliers-with medium-term platform investments in APIs, orchestration layers, and analytics capabilities. Leadership alignment and governance structures that prioritize cross-functional decision-making accelerate execution and reduce integration risk.
In conclusion, the path forward emphasizes pragmatic modernization: preserve continuity of core services, accelerate features that matter most to end users, and maintain an adaptive posture to regulatory and economic change. Those actions will enable institutions to sustain trust while unlocking new efficiencies and revenue opportunities across the payments ecosystem.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising adoption of real-time cross-border payment networks leveraging blockchain and distributed ledger technology
- 5.2. Integration of biometric authentication methods in mobile banking apps to enhance security during electronic fund transfers
- 5.3. Growing partnerships between fintech startups and established banks to streamline peer-to-peer payment solutions
- 5.4. Implementation of open banking APIs driving innovation in third-party payment initiation services
- 5.5. Increasing regulatory focus on instant payment settlement standards to mitigate fraud and ensure compliance
- 5.6. Expansion of contactless payment terminals supporting NFC and QR code transactions in retail environments
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Electronic Funds Transfer Market, by Payment Mode
- 8.1. Bank Transfer
- 8.2. Card Based
- 8.2.1. Credit Card
- 8.2.2. Debit Card
- 8.2.3. Prepaid Card
- 8.3. Mobile Wallet
- 9. Electronic Funds Transfer Market, by Transaction Type
- 9.1. Business To Consumer
- 9.2. Consumer To Business
- 9.3. Government To Consumer
- 9.4. Person To Person
- 10. Electronic Funds Transfer Market, by Component
- 10.1. Hardware
- 10.2. Services
- 10.2.1. Implementation & Integration
- 10.2.2. Support & Maintenance
- 10.3. Software
- 11. Electronic Funds Transfer Market, by End User
- 11.1. Consumer
- 11.2. Corporate
- 11.3. Government
- 12. Electronic Funds Transfer Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Electronic Funds Transfer Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Electronic Funds Transfer Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Fiserv Inc.
- 15.3.2. PayPal Holdings Inc.
- 15.3.3. Square Inc.
- 15.3.4. Stripe Inc.
- 15.3.5. Mastercard Incorporated
- 15.3.6. Visa Inc.
- 15.3.7. American Express Company
- 15.3.8. Discover Financial Services
- 15.3.9. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- 15.3.10. Bank of America Corporation
- 15.3.11. Wells Fargo & Company
- 15.3.12. Citigroup Inc.
- 15.3.13. Western Union Company
- 15.3.14. MoneyGram International Inc.
- 15.3.15. TransferWise Ltd.
- 15.3.16. Worldpay LLC
- 15.3.17. Global Payments Inc.
- 15.3.18. Adyen N.V.
- 15.3.19. ACI Worldwide Inc.
- 15.3.20. Jack Henry & Associates Inc.
- 15.3.21. Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated
- 15.3.22. NCR Corporation
- 15.3.23. Euronet Worldwide Inc.
- 15.3.24. Remitly Global Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.

