Electric Vehicles Battery Recycling Market by Battery Type (Lead-Acid Batteries, Lithium-Ion Batteries, Nickel-Metal Hydride Batteries), Recycling Process (Direct Recycling Processes, Hydrometallurgical Process, Pyrometallurgical Process), Source, End-use
Description
The Electric Vehicles Battery Recycling Market was valued at USD 21.55 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 25.37 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 19.17%, reaching USD 87.71 billion by 2032.
An incisive introduction describing why systematic battery recycling is a strategic imperative for securing materials, reducing emissions, and strengthening electrified mobility value chains
The transition from internal combustion engines to electric drivetrains has created an urgent requirement for systematic approaches to recover and reuse battery materials. This introductory analysis situates battery recycling as an essential component of sustainable mobility, connecting raw material security, environmental stewardship, and industrial competitiveness. Stakeholders across supply chains-original equipment manufacturers, battery producers, recyclers, policymakers, and dismantlers-must align around technical standards, collection mechanisms, and investment pathways to transform end-of-life batteries into reliable secondary material streams.
Importantly, this introduction recognizes that recycling is not a single technology but an interconnected set of processes, infrastructure, and commercial models. Trends such as the increasing prevalence of lithium-ion chemistries, the growth of electrified commercial vehicle fleets, and regulatory pressure on extended producer responsibility are converging to accelerate recycling priorities. As a result, organizations that understand operational realities, regulatory levers, and emerging business models will be better positioned to convert regulatory and supply-chain pressures into competitive advantage. This section lays the conceptual groundwork for actionable insights that follow, emphasizing the need for integrated strategies that combine collection, processing, and reintegration of recovered materials into battery manufacturing ecosystems.
A comprehensive overview of the profound technology, regulatory, and commercial shifts reshaping how used electric vehicle batteries are collected, processed, and reintegrated
The landscape for electric vehicle battery recycling is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological innovation, policy evolution, and evolving commercial models. Recent years have seen the maturation of hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical processes alongside early-stage direct recycling techniques that aim to preserve active cathode material and reduce waste. Simultaneously, advances in battery design, standardization of modules, and improved labeling and tracking technologies are making disassembly and material segregation more efficient. These technical changes are enabling higher-value recovery outcomes and supporting circularity ambitions.
On the commercial front, new partnerships between automakers, OEM suppliers, and specialized recyclers are redefining ownership and responsibility for end-of-life flows. Business models are diversifying to include take-back schemes, asset-light collection networks, and integrated recovery-to-manufacturing loops. Policy shifts-ranging from extended producer responsibility mandates to incentives for domestic processing-are creating clearer demand signals for recycled materials. As such, decision-makers must balance near-term operational investments with medium-term technology bets, because the interplay of regulation, capital deployment, and process innovation will determine which recycling pathways scale efficiently and sustainably.
A detailed assessment of how United States tariff measures enacted in 2025 reconfigured supply chains, incentivized domestic processing, and altered commercial incentives across battery recycling ecosystems
The introduction of new tariffs and trade measures in the United States during 2025 has had a cumulative effect on the economics and configuration of battery recycling value chains. By increasing the cost of imported critical materials and certain components, tariffs have incentivized a strategic pivot toward domestic processing capacity and closer integration between material recovery facilities and manufacturing sites. This dynamic is fostering investment in local hydrometallurgical and direct recycling capabilities that reduce reliance on long supply chains and mitigate tariff exposure.
Moreover, tariffs have encouraged stakeholders to reassess logistics and sourcing strategies. Some manufacturers and recycling firms are shortening supply chains or pursuing nearshoring of upstream refining to manage total landed costs. In parallel, regulatory responses and complementary domestic incentives have begun to offset transitional costs by favoring processors that can demonstrate domestic content or closed-loop capabilities. While tariffs raise the cost of some imported inputs, they simultaneously create a market environment in which recycled feedstock gains strategic value as a tariff-immune input. Consequently, companies that rapidly adapt by investing in scalable recycling processes, enhancing yield through better sorting and disassembly, and forging offtake agreements with battery makers are positioning themselves to capture resilience and competitive advantage in a more protectionist trade environment.
Actionable segmentation-driven insights that delineate how battery chemistries, recycling routes, feedstock origins, end-user roles, and vehicle classes create distinct strategic requirements
Understanding the market requires a segmentation-aware perspective that recognizes differences across battery chemistries, recycling processes, sources, end-users, and vehicle types. Based on battery type, the landscape includes lead-acid batteries, lithium-ion batteries, and nickel-metal hydride batteries, each with distinct material recovery profiles, processing requirements, and commercial value. Based on recycling process, stakeholders must evaluate direct recycling processes that aim to retain cathode material functionality alongside hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical process routes that recover elemental metals at differing energy and capital intensities. Based on source, recovered material flows are shaped by end of life batteries and production scrap, which demand differentiated collection, handling, and quality controls. Based on end-user, the chain serves automobile manufacturers, battery manufacturers, dismantlers and scrap yards, and recycling firms, each playing unique roles in feedstock aggregation, processing, and material reintegration. Based on vehicle type, the industry must address commercial electric vehicles and passenger electric vehicles, where duty cycles, battery sizes, and replacement patterns create distinctive recovery opportunities.
These segmented lenses reveal specific strategic implications. For instance, lithium-ion chemistries are the primary focus for high-value recovery and technology investment due to their material intensity and prevalence in new vehicles, whereas legacy lead-acid flows remain significant in different mobility segments and require established collection networks. Direct recycling promises material efficiency gains but is still scaling; hydrometallurgy provides selective recovery with lower thermal intensity, while pyrometallurgy offers robustness at scale but with higher energy requirements. Production scrap offers higher predictability and cleaner streams than end-of-life collections but requires alignment with manufacturers. End-users will increasingly demand recycled content and traceability, shaping contractual relationships and incentivizing investment in quality assurance. Vehicle segment differences-between heavy-duty commercial platforms and passenger car fleets-affect battery design, reuse potential, and timing of EOL waves, and therefore should inform capacity planning for recycling infrastructure.
A nuanced examination of how differing regulatory regimes, industrial strengths, and policy incentives across global regions shape strategic choices for recycling infrastructure and partnerships
Regional dynamics and policy environments are driving differentiated trajectories across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, each exhibiting distinct regulatory priorities, industrial capacities, and investment ecosystems. In the Americas, a combination of policy incentives for domestic processing and an expanding automotive electrification agenda is accelerating investment in recycling infrastructure and downstream refining capacity. This region is increasingly focused on aligning recycling throughput with local manufacturing to reduce import exposure and create resilient material loops.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a regulatory-intensive environment where strict environmental standards and extended producer responsibility frameworks push producers and recyclers toward higher recovery efficiencies and rigorous traceability. Investment here prioritizes technological sophistication and compliance integration. The Asia-Pacific region combines large-scale battery manufacturing hubs with a growing regulatory emphasis on circularity; it remains a focal point for both upstream cathode and cell production and increasingly for processing capability, meaning that competition for feedstock and skilled labor will intensify. Across all regions, cross-border logistics, varying regulatory timelines, and differences in energy mix influence the comparative advantages of process routes and location choices for new facilities. Strategic actors must therefore evaluate regional policy signals, infrastructure readiness, and workforce availability when planning capacity deployment and partnership strategies.
An industry-focused analysis of how operators across the recycling, manufacturing, refining, and technology stack are aligning investments to capture value from recovered battery materials
A closer look at industry participants reveals a diversified ecosystem that includes specialized recyclers, battery manufacturers, automotive OEMs, materials refiners, and technology providers offering process innovation and digital traceability. Leading recyclers are investing in scale, automation, and process optimization to improve yield and reduce unit costs, while battery manufacturers are experimenting with design for recycling to simplify disassembly and increase material recoverability. Automotive OEMs are increasingly entering into strategic relationships or equity partnerships with recyclers and refiners to secure recycled feedstocks and demonstrate compliance with regulatory and voluntary recycled content targets.
Technology providers are also critical, supplying sensor systems, robotics for disassembly, and analytics tools for sorting and quality assurance that raise the value of recovered streams. Meanwhile, refiners and chemical processors are adapting their plants to handle diverse inputs and to produce battery-grade precursor materials that meet the specifications of cell manufacturers. The ecosystem is therefore evolving from a collection of siloed activities into a more integrated set of capabilities that spans collection, processing, refinement, and reintegration. Companies that can combine operational excellence with contractual certainty-through long-term offtake agreements or vertical integration-will be better positioned to capture the benefits of circular material flows and to manage input volatility.
Practical and prioritized recommendations for corporate leaders to accelerate resilient recycling capabilities, secure feedstock, and build integrated circular supply chains for batteries
Industry leaders should adopt a suite of actionable strategies that balance operational execution with strategic partnerships to accelerate circularity and secure supply resilience. First, prioritize investments in flexible processing that can handle multiple chemistries and feedstock quality profiles, enabling capacity to adapt as vehicle fleets and battery designs evolve. Second, develop or join collection networks and take-back schemes that improve feedstock quality and predictability, because reliable input streams are essential to achieving higher recovery yields and stable commercial terms. Third, pursue strategic partnerships with OEMs, battery makers, and chemical refiners to create integrated value chains and to enable recycled material offtake at commercially viable terms.
Additionally, invest in digital traceability and quality assurance systems to provide downstream users with the confidence needed to accept recycled precursors. Complement technology investment with workforce development and safety protocols that reduce processing risk and increase throughput. Finally, engage proactively with policymakers to shape pragmatic regulations that encourage investment and provide transitional incentives for domestic processing capacity. By aligning capital deployment, partnerships, technical capability, and policy engagement, industry leaders can move from opportunistic recycling projects toward durable, system-level solutions that deliver both environmental and commercial returns.
A transparent and robust research methodology integrating primary interviews, facility-level observations, and secondary technical and regulatory reviews to ensure practical and validated insight
This research combines primary and secondary methodologies to create a rigorous, transparent analytical foundation. Primary research included structured interviews and follow-up consultations with executives across automotive OEMs, battery manufacturers, specialist recyclers, materials refiners, and policy experts, complemented by site visits to representative recycling and processing facilities where feasible. These interactions were designed to surface operational challenges, technology adoption timelines, contractual frameworks, and investment priorities directly from practitioners.
Secondary research involved a systematic review of publicly available regulatory filings, technical literature on recycling processes, corporate sustainability reports, and trade policy announcements to construct an evidence-based context for primary findings. Data triangulation techniques were used to validate technology performance claims and to reconcile differing stakeholder perspectives. Analytical frameworks emphasized lifecycle thinking, sensitivity to feedstock quality variance, and attention to logistics and regulatory constraints. Finally, conclusions and recommendations were developed through iterative validation with industry contacts to ensure practical relevance and applicability to strategic decision-making.
A forward-looking conclusion emphasizing why integrated technical, commercial, and policy approaches are essential to convert used batteries into strategic circular assets
In conclusion, battery recycling is now a strategic linchpin for achieving resilient, sustainable electrified mobility. The confluence of evolving battery chemistries, emerging recycling technologies, shifting trade policies, and heightened regulatory expectations has created both urgency and opportunity. Firms that move swiftly to secure high-quality feedstocks, deploy adaptable processing capabilities, and forge durable partnerships across the value chain will reduce exposure to material supply shocks while capturing the environmental and reputational benefits of circular practices.
Going forward, success will require a dynamic approach that integrates technological experimentation with pragmatic operational planning and proactive policy engagement. Stakeholders should expect continued evolution in process efficiency, regulatory frameworks, and commercial business models, and they must prepare to iterate on strategy as the industry matures. Ultimately, the most resilient participants will be those that combine technical rigor, commercial alignment, and policy foresight to transform end-of-life batteries from a compliance obligation into a strategic source of materials and value.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An incisive introduction describing why systematic battery recycling is a strategic imperative for securing materials, reducing emissions, and strengthening electrified mobility value chains
The transition from internal combustion engines to electric drivetrains has created an urgent requirement for systematic approaches to recover and reuse battery materials. This introductory analysis situates battery recycling as an essential component of sustainable mobility, connecting raw material security, environmental stewardship, and industrial competitiveness. Stakeholders across supply chains-original equipment manufacturers, battery producers, recyclers, policymakers, and dismantlers-must align around technical standards, collection mechanisms, and investment pathways to transform end-of-life batteries into reliable secondary material streams.
Importantly, this introduction recognizes that recycling is not a single technology but an interconnected set of processes, infrastructure, and commercial models. Trends such as the increasing prevalence of lithium-ion chemistries, the growth of electrified commercial vehicle fleets, and regulatory pressure on extended producer responsibility are converging to accelerate recycling priorities. As a result, organizations that understand operational realities, regulatory levers, and emerging business models will be better positioned to convert regulatory and supply-chain pressures into competitive advantage. This section lays the conceptual groundwork for actionable insights that follow, emphasizing the need for integrated strategies that combine collection, processing, and reintegration of recovered materials into battery manufacturing ecosystems.
A comprehensive overview of the profound technology, regulatory, and commercial shifts reshaping how used electric vehicle batteries are collected, processed, and reintegrated
The landscape for electric vehicle battery recycling is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological innovation, policy evolution, and evolving commercial models. Recent years have seen the maturation of hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical processes alongside early-stage direct recycling techniques that aim to preserve active cathode material and reduce waste. Simultaneously, advances in battery design, standardization of modules, and improved labeling and tracking technologies are making disassembly and material segregation more efficient. These technical changes are enabling higher-value recovery outcomes and supporting circularity ambitions.
On the commercial front, new partnerships between automakers, OEM suppliers, and specialized recyclers are redefining ownership and responsibility for end-of-life flows. Business models are diversifying to include take-back schemes, asset-light collection networks, and integrated recovery-to-manufacturing loops. Policy shifts-ranging from extended producer responsibility mandates to incentives for domestic processing-are creating clearer demand signals for recycled materials. As such, decision-makers must balance near-term operational investments with medium-term technology bets, because the interplay of regulation, capital deployment, and process innovation will determine which recycling pathways scale efficiently and sustainably.
A detailed assessment of how United States tariff measures enacted in 2025 reconfigured supply chains, incentivized domestic processing, and altered commercial incentives across battery recycling ecosystems
The introduction of new tariffs and trade measures in the United States during 2025 has had a cumulative effect on the economics and configuration of battery recycling value chains. By increasing the cost of imported critical materials and certain components, tariffs have incentivized a strategic pivot toward domestic processing capacity and closer integration between material recovery facilities and manufacturing sites. This dynamic is fostering investment in local hydrometallurgical and direct recycling capabilities that reduce reliance on long supply chains and mitigate tariff exposure.
Moreover, tariffs have encouraged stakeholders to reassess logistics and sourcing strategies. Some manufacturers and recycling firms are shortening supply chains or pursuing nearshoring of upstream refining to manage total landed costs. In parallel, regulatory responses and complementary domestic incentives have begun to offset transitional costs by favoring processors that can demonstrate domestic content or closed-loop capabilities. While tariffs raise the cost of some imported inputs, they simultaneously create a market environment in which recycled feedstock gains strategic value as a tariff-immune input. Consequently, companies that rapidly adapt by investing in scalable recycling processes, enhancing yield through better sorting and disassembly, and forging offtake agreements with battery makers are positioning themselves to capture resilience and competitive advantage in a more protectionist trade environment.
Actionable segmentation-driven insights that delineate how battery chemistries, recycling routes, feedstock origins, end-user roles, and vehicle classes create distinct strategic requirements
Understanding the market requires a segmentation-aware perspective that recognizes differences across battery chemistries, recycling processes, sources, end-users, and vehicle types. Based on battery type, the landscape includes lead-acid batteries, lithium-ion batteries, and nickel-metal hydride batteries, each with distinct material recovery profiles, processing requirements, and commercial value. Based on recycling process, stakeholders must evaluate direct recycling processes that aim to retain cathode material functionality alongside hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical process routes that recover elemental metals at differing energy and capital intensities. Based on source, recovered material flows are shaped by end of life batteries and production scrap, which demand differentiated collection, handling, and quality controls. Based on end-user, the chain serves automobile manufacturers, battery manufacturers, dismantlers and scrap yards, and recycling firms, each playing unique roles in feedstock aggregation, processing, and material reintegration. Based on vehicle type, the industry must address commercial electric vehicles and passenger electric vehicles, where duty cycles, battery sizes, and replacement patterns create distinctive recovery opportunities.
These segmented lenses reveal specific strategic implications. For instance, lithium-ion chemistries are the primary focus for high-value recovery and technology investment due to their material intensity and prevalence in new vehicles, whereas legacy lead-acid flows remain significant in different mobility segments and require established collection networks. Direct recycling promises material efficiency gains but is still scaling; hydrometallurgy provides selective recovery with lower thermal intensity, while pyrometallurgy offers robustness at scale but with higher energy requirements. Production scrap offers higher predictability and cleaner streams than end-of-life collections but requires alignment with manufacturers. End-users will increasingly demand recycled content and traceability, shaping contractual relationships and incentivizing investment in quality assurance. Vehicle segment differences-between heavy-duty commercial platforms and passenger car fleets-affect battery design, reuse potential, and timing of EOL waves, and therefore should inform capacity planning for recycling infrastructure.
A nuanced examination of how differing regulatory regimes, industrial strengths, and policy incentives across global regions shape strategic choices for recycling infrastructure and partnerships
Regional dynamics and policy environments are driving differentiated trajectories across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, each exhibiting distinct regulatory priorities, industrial capacities, and investment ecosystems. In the Americas, a combination of policy incentives for domestic processing and an expanding automotive electrification agenda is accelerating investment in recycling infrastructure and downstream refining capacity. This region is increasingly focused on aligning recycling throughput with local manufacturing to reduce import exposure and create resilient material loops.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a regulatory-intensive environment where strict environmental standards and extended producer responsibility frameworks push producers and recyclers toward higher recovery efficiencies and rigorous traceability. Investment here prioritizes technological sophistication and compliance integration. The Asia-Pacific region combines large-scale battery manufacturing hubs with a growing regulatory emphasis on circularity; it remains a focal point for both upstream cathode and cell production and increasingly for processing capability, meaning that competition for feedstock and skilled labor will intensify. Across all regions, cross-border logistics, varying regulatory timelines, and differences in energy mix influence the comparative advantages of process routes and location choices for new facilities. Strategic actors must therefore evaluate regional policy signals, infrastructure readiness, and workforce availability when planning capacity deployment and partnership strategies.
An industry-focused analysis of how operators across the recycling, manufacturing, refining, and technology stack are aligning investments to capture value from recovered battery materials
A closer look at industry participants reveals a diversified ecosystem that includes specialized recyclers, battery manufacturers, automotive OEMs, materials refiners, and technology providers offering process innovation and digital traceability. Leading recyclers are investing in scale, automation, and process optimization to improve yield and reduce unit costs, while battery manufacturers are experimenting with design for recycling to simplify disassembly and increase material recoverability. Automotive OEMs are increasingly entering into strategic relationships or equity partnerships with recyclers and refiners to secure recycled feedstocks and demonstrate compliance with regulatory and voluntary recycled content targets.
Technology providers are also critical, supplying sensor systems, robotics for disassembly, and analytics tools for sorting and quality assurance that raise the value of recovered streams. Meanwhile, refiners and chemical processors are adapting their plants to handle diverse inputs and to produce battery-grade precursor materials that meet the specifications of cell manufacturers. The ecosystem is therefore evolving from a collection of siloed activities into a more integrated set of capabilities that spans collection, processing, refinement, and reintegration. Companies that can combine operational excellence with contractual certainty-through long-term offtake agreements or vertical integration-will be better positioned to capture the benefits of circular material flows and to manage input volatility.
Practical and prioritized recommendations for corporate leaders to accelerate resilient recycling capabilities, secure feedstock, and build integrated circular supply chains for batteries
Industry leaders should adopt a suite of actionable strategies that balance operational execution with strategic partnerships to accelerate circularity and secure supply resilience. First, prioritize investments in flexible processing that can handle multiple chemistries and feedstock quality profiles, enabling capacity to adapt as vehicle fleets and battery designs evolve. Second, develop or join collection networks and take-back schemes that improve feedstock quality and predictability, because reliable input streams are essential to achieving higher recovery yields and stable commercial terms. Third, pursue strategic partnerships with OEMs, battery makers, and chemical refiners to create integrated value chains and to enable recycled material offtake at commercially viable terms.
Additionally, invest in digital traceability and quality assurance systems to provide downstream users with the confidence needed to accept recycled precursors. Complement technology investment with workforce development and safety protocols that reduce processing risk and increase throughput. Finally, engage proactively with policymakers to shape pragmatic regulations that encourage investment and provide transitional incentives for domestic processing capacity. By aligning capital deployment, partnerships, technical capability, and policy engagement, industry leaders can move from opportunistic recycling projects toward durable, system-level solutions that deliver both environmental and commercial returns.
A transparent and robust research methodology integrating primary interviews, facility-level observations, and secondary technical and regulatory reviews to ensure practical and validated insight
This research combines primary and secondary methodologies to create a rigorous, transparent analytical foundation. Primary research included structured interviews and follow-up consultations with executives across automotive OEMs, battery manufacturers, specialist recyclers, materials refiners, and policy experts, complemented by site visits to representative recycling and processing facilities where feasible. These interactions were designed to surface operational challenges, technology adoption timelines, contractual frameworks, and investment priorities directly from practitioners.
Secondary research involved a systematic review of publicly available regulatory filings, technical literature on recycling processes, corporate sustainability reports, and trade policy announcements to construct an evidence-based context for primary findings. Data triangulation techniques were used to validate technology performance claims and to reconcile differing stakeholder perspectives. Analytical frameworks emphasized lifecycle thinking, sensitivity to feedstock quality variance, and attention to logistics and regulatory constraints. Finally, conclusions and recommendations were developed through iterative validation with industry contacts to ensure practical relevance and applicability to strategic decision-making.
A forward-looking conclusion emphasizing why integrated technical, commercial, and policy approaches are essential to convert used batteries into strategic circular assets
In conclusion, battery recycling is now a strategic linchpin for achieving resilient, sustainable electrified mobility. The confluence of evolving battery chemistries, emerging recycling technologies, shifting trade policies, and heightened regulatory expectations has created both urgency and opportunity. Firms that move swiftly to secure high-quality feedstocks, deploy adaptable processing capabilities, and forge durable partnerships across the value chain will reduce exposure to material supply shocks while capturing the environmental and reputational benefits of circular practices.
Going forward, success will require a dynamic approach that integrates technological experimentation with pragmatic operational planning and proactive policy engagement. Stakeholders should expect continued evolution in process efficiency, regulatory frameworks, and commercial business models, and they must prepare to iterate on strategy as the industry matures. Ultimately, the most resilient participants will be those that combine technical rigor, commercial alignment, and policy foresight to transform end-of-life batteries from a compliance obligation into a strategic source of materials and value.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
194 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Advancements in hydrometallurgical techniques to recover high-purity nickel and cobalt
- 5.2. Emergence of gigafactories dedicated to recycling and refining end-of-life electric vehicle batteries
- 5.3. Scaling up closed-loop battery recycling processes to minimize raw material imports
- 5.4. Integrating blockchain for transparent supply chains in lithium-ion battery recycling
- 5.5. Collaborations between automakers and recyclers for end-of-life battery second-life applications
- 5.6. Development of modular battery disassembly robots to streamline recycling operations
- 5.7. Implementation of regulatory frameworks mandating minimum recycled content in new EV batteries
- 5.8. Investment in direct cathode recycling methods to reduce energy consumption and waste
- 5.9. Strategic partnerships to build regional battery collection networks for efficient material recovery
- 5.10. Adoption of AI-driven sorting and grading systems to optimize recycled battery material yields
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Electric Vehicles Battery Recycling Market, by Battery Type
- 8.1. Lead-Acid Batteries
- 8.2. Lithium-Ion Batteries
- 8.3. Nickel-Metal Hydride Batteries
- 9. Electric Vehicles Battery Recycling Market, by Recycling Process
- 9.1. Direct Recycling Processes
- 9.2. Hydrometallurgical Process
- 9.3. Pyrometallurgical Process
- 10. Electric Vehicles Battery Recycling Market, by Source
- 10.1. End of Life
- 10.2. Production Scrap
- 11. Electric Vehicles Battery Recycling Market, by End-user
- 11.1. Automobile Manufacturers
- 11.2. Battery Manufacturers
- 11.3. Dismantlers & Scrap Yards
- 11.4. Recycling Firms
- 12. Electric Vehicles Battery Recycling Market, by Vehicle Type
- 12.1. Commercial Electric Vehicles
- 12.2. Passenger Electric Vehicles
- 13. Electric Vehicles Battery Recycling Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Electric Vehicles Battery Recycling Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Electric Vehicles Battery Recycling Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. ACCUREC-Recycling GmbH
- 16.3.2. Akkuser Oy
- 16.3.3. American Battery Technology Company by Komatsu Ltd.
- 16.3.4. Aqua Metals, Inc.
- 16.3.5. Attero Recycling Pvt. Ltd.
- 16.3.6. Batrec Industrie AG
- 16.3.7. Battery Recyclers of America
- 16.3.8. Cirba Solutions by Battery Solutions, LLC
- 16.3.9. Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited
- 16.3.10. Duesenfeld GmbH
- 16.3.11. Ecobat, LLC
- 16.3.12. Envirostream Australia Pty Ltd. by Lithium Australia NL
- 16.3.13. F & R Cawley Ltd. by SUEZ Recycling and Recovery
- 16.3.14. Fortum Corporation
- 16.3.15. Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.16. GEM Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.17. Li-Cycle Corp.
- 16.3.18. Lithion Technologies
- 16.3.19. Neometals Ltd.
- 16.3.20. OnTo Technology LLC
- 16.3.21. RecycLiCo Battery Materials Inc.
- 16.3.22. SMCI Group
- 16.3.23. Stena Metall Group
- 16.3.24. Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.25. Tata Chemicals Limited
- 16.3.26. TES Group by SK Ecoplant
- 16.3.27. Umicore N.V.
- 16.3.28. Toshiba Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
