Electric Vehicle Polymers Market by Material Type (Elastomers, Thermoplastics, Thermosets), Application (Exterior Components, Interior Components, Powertrain Systems), Vehicle Type, Distribution Channel, End-Use - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Electric Vehicle Polymers Market was valued at USD 5.63 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 5.97 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.40%, reaching USD 9.27 billion by 2032.
A concise introduction to how polymer selection and supply chain strategy are reshaping electric vehicle engineering priorities and procurement decisions
Electric vehicle architectures are redefining material demands across automotive engineering, and polymers are central to that transformation. As EV manufacturers pursue lighter weight, enhanced safety, and thermal management compatibilities, elastomers, thermoplastics, and thermosets are being re-evaluated not only for functional performance but also for manufacturability, recyclability, and supply security. Consequently, materials teams and procurement functions must balance competing priorities: cost control, regulatory compliance, and the need for rapid iteration across model platforms.
Transitioning from legacy internal combustion vehicle materials to EV-specific polymer solutions requires disciplined cross-functional collaboration. Product development, sourcing, and manufacturing engineering must co-design components to reduce assembly complexity while achieving targets for crashworthiness, acoustic comfort, and thermal stability. Furthermore, regulatory developments and customer expectations for sustainability are increasing the importance of polymer recyclability and end-of-life considerations, which in turn influence design choices and supplier selection.
How technological breakthroughs, sustainability mandates, and supply chain realignment are jointly accelerating new material choices and supplier strategies across electric vehicle platforms
The landscape for polymers in electric vehicles is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological, regulatory, and commercial forces. Electrified powertrains demand new thermal and chemical resistance characteristics from materials used in battery housings, cooling pipes, and transmission systems, while vehicle interiors and exteriors are being reimagined for weight reduction and enhanced cabin experience. These shifts are forcing material scientists and design engineers to accelerate adoption of specialty elastomers and engineered thermoplastics, and to integrate thermosets where structural and high-temperature properties remain paramount.
Moreover, sustainability imperatives are pushing the industry toward higher-performing recycled content and formulations that are compatible with advanced recycling streams. At the same time, supply chain realignment-motivated by geopolitical tensions and changing trade policies-is prompting original equipment manufacturers to diversify suppliers and invest in nearshoring or regional manufacturing hubs. Taken together, these changes are creating a dynamic environment where agility in material qualification and supplier partnerships will determine the speed at which manufacturers can bring EV programs to market with the required reliability and regulatory compliance.
Evaluating the cumulative consequences of recent United States tariff adjustments on sourcing, design choices, and supplier strategies for electric vehicle polymer supply chains
Recent tariff developments and trade policy adjustments are producing a cumulative set of effects that are reshaping sourcing and manufacturing strategies for EV polymers. Tariff-driven cost pressures on imported polymers and compound inputs are encouraging manufacturers to reassess total landed cost and to prioritize suppliers with resilient regional footprints. In response, many firms are recalibrating long-term supplier agreements and increasing emphasis on multi-sourcing to mitigate exposure to sudden trade shifts. As a result, procurement teams are placing greater weight on supplier diversification and on contracts that include protective terms for trade-related volatility.
In addition, tariff dynamics are having implications for product design and material selection. Where import duties make certain high-performance polymers less economically feasible, engineering teams are exploring material substitution or design modifications to maintain performance targets while reducing tariff exposure. Regulatory complexity also raises compliance costs and administrative burdens, which in turn affect lead times and working capital requirements. Consequently, manufacturers are investing in closer collaboration with polymer suppliers, including joint development agreements and localized compounding capabilities, to reduce dependency on long cross-border supply chains and to preserve program timelines.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis explaining how material classes, vehicle applications, distribution pathways, vehicle types, and end-use contexts converge to shape polymer priorities in EV programs
A nuanced understanding of market segmentation illuminates where technical requirements and commercial pressures intersect, and it guides prioritization of development and sourcing activity. Based on material type, the market is studied across elastomers, thermoplastics, and thermosets, with elastomers further analyzed across acrylate elastomers, silicone elastomers, and styrene-butadiene rubber, thermoplastics further analyzed across acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polypropylene, and polyvinyl chloride, and thermosets further analyzed across epoxy, phenolic resins, and polyurethane. Each material family brings distinct mechanical, thermal, and chemical resistance profiles that map to different vehicle requirements and production processes.
Based on application, the market is studied across exterior components, interior components, and powertrain systems, with exterior components further analyzed across body panels, bumpers, and trunk lids, interior components further analyzed across dashboard, headliners, and seating, and powertrain systems further analyzed across battery housings, cooling pipes, and transmission systems. These application categories illuminate where performance trade-offs matter most, whether the priority is structural integrity, thermal management, acoustic damping, or aesthetic finish. Based on vehicle type, the market is studied across commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles, with commercial vehicles further analyzed across heavy commercial vehicles and light commercial vehicles, revealing differing duty cycles and regulatory regimes that influence material selection and lifecycle expectations.
Based on distribution channel, the market is studied across offline and online channels, underscoring different go-to-market dynamics for raw polymer suppliers versus specialty compounders and distributors. Finally, based on end-use, the market is studied across aftermarket and OEMs, which highlights divergent quality standards, warranty obligations, and procurement rhythms. Taken together, these segmentation lenses provide a multidimensional view that aligns technical performance with commercial realities, enabling stakeholders to target investment in material development, qualification testing, and supply chain partnerships where they will deliver the greatest program impact.
Key regional dynamics and strategic imperatives across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine polymer sourcing, qualification, and circularity approaches for EV manufacturers
Regional dynamics are shaping both supplier strategies and engineering priorities, with distinct considerations in the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, proximity to large EV OEMs and growing battery manufacturing capacity is amplifying demand for polymers that support thermal management and structural efficiency, while incentives for local production are influencing investment in regional compounding and recycling capabilities. Consequently, manufacturers and suppliers are prioritizing lead-time reduction, industrial scale-up, and regulatory alignment to serve North American and Latin American customers more responsively.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, stringent regulatory standards and ambitious sustainability targets are driving emphasis on recyclable formulations and on materials that meet demanding crash and fire-safety criteria. As a result, European stakeholders are investing in advanced material qualification and circularity solutions, which in turn are informing product specifications and supplier selection. Meanwhile, in the Asia-Pacific region, extensive manufacturing capacity and vertically integrated supply chains-combined with rapid EV adoption in several markets-are creating opportunities for scale-driven cost improvements and for accelerated commercialization of next-generation polymer systems. Across regions, transitional trade policies and regional incentives are prompting a mix of nearshoring, regional sourcing, and targeted partnerships that reflect both local regulatory requirements and global program strategies.
Insight into how leading material manufacturers, specialty compounders, and service-driven suppliers are differentiating through partnerships, technical services, and regional production capabilities
Leading suppliers and materials innovators are central to delivering the performance, reliability, and sustainability required by modern electric vehicle platforms. Companies with deep expertise in high-performance elastomers, advanced thermoplastics, and durable thermosets are investing in joint development agreements with OEMs and tier suppliers to co-create materials that meet specific thermal, chemical, and mechanical demands. These partnerships frequently include shared validation protocols, pilot production runs, and integrated quality systems to reduce time-to-first-production and to ensure consistent in-vehicle performance.
At the same time, specialty compounders and regional distributors are expanding capabilities to support localized blending, color matching, and recyclate integration, which helps OEMs meet regulatory requirements and consumer expectations for sustainability. Strategic differentiation increasingly comes from a company’s ability to offer technical services-such as failure analysis, lifecycle assessments, and design-for-recyclability consulting-alongside the polymer product. Consequently, incumbent chemical producers and nimble specialty players alike are leveraging vertical integration, targeted R&D investments, and service-oriented business models to capture value across the EV value chain.
Actionable strategic recommendations for procurement, engineering, and leadership to strengthen supply chain resilience, expedite material qualification, and advance circularity in EV programs
Industry leaders should take decisive steps to de-risk supply chains, accelerate material qualification, and embed circularity into product roadmaps. First, procurement and engineering teams must deepen collaboration through joint development agreements that align technical specifications with supplier capabilities and that include contingency clauses for trade disruptions. By integrating supplier input earlier in the design cycle, organizations can reduce the number of rework iterations and shorten validation timelines.
Second, companies should invest in regional compounding and recycling partnerships to reduce exposure to cross-border tariff volatility and to meet evolving sustainability regulations. These investments will also facilitate faster sampling and iteration, which is particularly valuable when qualifying advanced elastomers and engineered thermoplastics for thermal management and structural roles. Third, design teams should adopt a materials-first approach that prioritizes recyclability and reparability alongside performance, thereby reducing end-of-life complexity and aligning with regulatory trends. Finally, senior leaders must ensure that contractual frameworks, risk registers, and capital planning reflect the full implications of trade policy and supplier concentration risks so that strategic decisions are resilient to geopolitical and economic changes.
Transparent description of the mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical review, and scenario-based analysis to validate material and supply chain insights
This research synthesizes primary interviews with materials scientists, procurement leaders, and manufacturing engineers, together with secondary analysis of industry journals, regulatory documents, and supplier technical data sheets. Primary inputs were gathered through structured interviews and workshops that probed material performance in thermal, mechanical, and chemical environments representative of electric vehicle applications. These engagements were augmented by technical literature reviews and by benchmarking of supplier capabilities against standard qualification protocols.
Analytical methods included material performance mapping, risk exposure assessment, and scenario analysis to evaluate the implications of trade and regulatory developments on sourcing and design choices. Validation steps involved cross-referencing interview findings with supplier technical documentation and with public regulatory guidance to ensure consistency and accuracy. Transparency was maintained through documentation of interview protocols, inclusion criteria for suppliers and stakeholders, and the assumptions used in scenario construction, enabling stakeholders to understand the basis for the insights and to apply them in practical decision-making contexts.
Strategic conclusion summarizing why integrated material, supply chain, and sustainability actions are essential for long-term EV program success and resilience
Polymers are an enabling technology for electric vehicles, but realizing their full potential requires coherent alignment across design, sourcing, and sustainability strategies. The confluence of higher thermal and mechanical demands, evolving regulatory expectations, and shifting trade policies is raising the bar for material performance and supply chain resilience. As a result, organizations that move proactively to qualify performant, recyclable materials and that invest in regional supplier partnerships will be better positioned to meet delivery schedules and regulatory obligations while preserving product quality.
In closing, stakeholders should treat material decisions as strategic levers rather than purely technical choices. By integrating procurement, engineering, and sustainability goals, firms can reduce program risk, accelerate time-to-market, and create demonstrable value for customers and regulators alike. Continued investment in supplier collaboration, validation infrastructure, and circularity measures will be critical to maintaining competitiveness in the rapidly evolving EV ecosystem.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise introduction to how polymer selection and supply chain strategy are reshaping electric vehicle engineering priorities and procurement decisions
Electric vehicle architectures are redefining material demands across automotive engineering, and polymers are central to that transformation. As EV manufacturers pursue lighter weight, enhanced safety, and thermal management compatibilities, elastomers, thermoplastics, and thermosets are being re-evaluated not only for functional performance but also for manufacturability, recyclability, and supply security. Consequently, materials teams and procurement functions must balance competing priorities: cost control, regulatory compliance, and the need for rapid iteration across model platforms.
Transitioning from legacy internal combustion vehicle materials to EV-specific polymer solutions requires disciplined cross-functional collaboration. Product development, sourcing, and manufacturing engineering must co-design components to reduce assembly complexity while achieving targets for crashworthiness, acoustic comfort, and thermal stability. Furthermore, regulatory developments and customer expectations for sustainability are increasing the importance of polymer recyclability and end-of-life considerations, which in turn influence design choices and supplier selection.
How technological breakthroughs, sustainability mandates, and supply chain realignment are jointly accelerating new material choices and supplier strategies across electric vehicle platforms
The landscape for polymers in electric vehicles is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological, regulatory, and commercial forces. Electrified powertrains demand new thermal and chemical resistance characteristics from materials used in battery housings, cooling pipes, and transmission systems, while vehicle interiors and exteriors are being reimagined for weight reduction and enhanced cabin experience. These shifts are forcing material scientists and design engineers to accelerate adoption of specialty elastomers and engineered thermoplastics, and to integrate thermosets where structural and high-temperature properties remain paramount.
Moreover, sustainability imperatives are pushing the industry toward higher-performing recycled content and formulations that are compatible with advanced recycling streams. At the same time, supply chain realignment-motivated by geopolitical tensions and changing trade policies-is prompting original equipment manufacturers to diversify suppliers and invest in nearshoring or regional manufacturing hubs. Taken together, these changes are creating a dynamic environment where agility in material qualification and supplier partnerships will determine the speed at which manufacturers can bring EV programs to market with the required reliability and regulatory compliance.
Evaluating the cumulative consequences of recent United States tariff adjustments on sourcing, design choices, and supplier strategies for electric vehicle polymer supply chains
Recent tariff developments and trade policy adjustments are producing a cumulative set of effects that are reshaping sourcing and manufacturing strategies for EV polymers. Tariff-driven cost pressures on imported polymers and compound inputs are encouraging manufacturers to reassess total landed cost and to prioritize suppliers with resilient regional footprints. In response, many firms are recalibrating long-term supplier agreements and increasing emphasis on multi-sourcing to mitigate exposure to sudden trade shifts. As a result, procurement teams are placing greater weight on supplier diversification and on contracts that include protective terms for trade-related volatility.
In addition, tariff dynamics are having implications for product design and material selection. Where import duties make certain high-performance polymers less economically feasible, engineering teams are exploring material substitution or design modifications to maintain performance targets while reducing tariff exposure. Regulatory complexity also raises compliance costs and administrative burdens, which in turn affect lead times and working capital requirements. Consequently, manufacturers are investing in closer collaboration with polymer suppliers, including joint development agreements and localized compounding capabilities, to reduce dependency on long cross-border supply chains and to preserve program timelines.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis explaining how material classes, vehicle applications, distribution pathways, vehicle types, and end-use contexts converge to shape polymer priorities in EV programs
A nuanced understanding of market segmentation illuminates where technical requirements and commercial pressures intersect, and it guides prioritization of development and sourcing activity. Based on material type, the market is studied across elastomers, thermoplastics, and thermosets, with elastomers further analyzed across acrylate elastomers, silicone elastomers, and styrene-butadiene rubber, thermoplastics further analyzed across acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polypropylene, and polyvinyl chloride, and thermosets further analyzed across epoxy, phenolic resins, and polyurethane. Each material family brings distinct mechanical, thermal, and chemical resistance profiles that map to different vehicle requirements and production processes.
Based on application, the market is studied across exterior components, interior components, and powertrain systems, with exterior components further analyzed across body panels, bumpers, and trunk lids, interior components further analyzed across dashboard, headliners, and seating, and powertrain systems further analyzed across battery housings, cooling pipes, and transmission systems. These application categories illuminate where performance trade-offs matter most, whether the priority is structural integrity, thermal management, acoustic damping, or aesthetic finish. Based on vehicle type, the market is studied across commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles, with commercial vehicles further analyzed across heavy commercial vehicles and light commercial vehicles, revealing differing duty cycles and regulatory regimes that influence material selection and lifecycle expectations.
Based on distribution channel, the market is studied across offline and online channels, underscoring different go-to-market dynamics for raw polymer suppliers versus specialty compounders and distributors. Finally, based on end-use, the market is studied across aftermarket and OEMs, which highlights divergent quality standards, warranty obligations, and procurement rhythms. Taken together, these segmentation lenses provide a multidimensional view that aligns technical performance with commercial realities, enabling stakeholders to target investment in material development, qualification testing, and supply chain partnerships where they will deliver the greatest program impact.
Key regional dynamics and strategic imperatives across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine polymer sourcing, qualification, and circularity approaches for EV manufacturers
Regional dynamics are shaping both supplier strategies and engineering priorities, with distinct considerations in the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, proximity to large EV OEMs and growing battery manufacturing capacity is amplifying demand for polymers that support thermal management and structural efficiency, while incentives for local production are influencing investment in regional compounding and recycling capabilities. Consequently, manufacturers and suppliers are prioritizing lead-time reduction, industrial scale-up, and regulatory alignment to serve North American and Latin American customers more responsively.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, stringent regulatory standards and ambitious sustainability targets are driving emphasis on recyclable formulations and on materials that meet demanding crash and fire-safety criteria. As a result, European stakeholders are investing in advanced material qualification and circularity solutions, which in turn are informing product specifications and supplier selection. Meanwhile, in the Asia-Pacific region, extensive manufacturing capacity and vertically integrated supply chains-combined with rapid EV adoption in several markets-are creating opportunities for scale-driven cost improvements and for accelerated commercialization of next-generation polymer systems. Across regions, transitional trade policies and regional incentives are prompting a mix of nearshoring, regional sourcing, and targeted partnerships that reflect both local regulatory requirements and global program strategies.
Insight into how leading material manufacturers, specialty compounders, and service-driven suppliers are differentiating through partnerships, technical services, and regional production capabilities
Leading suppliers and materials innovators are central to delivering the performance, reliability, and sustainability required by modern electric vehicle platforms. Companies with deep expertise in high-performance elastomers, advanced thermoplastics, and durable thermosets are investing in joint development agreements with OEMs and tier suppliers to co-create materials that meet specific thermal, chemical, and mechanical demands. These partnerships frequently include shared validation protocols, pilot production runs, and integrated quality systems to reduce time-to-first-production and to ensure consistent in-vehicle performance.
At the same time, specialty compounders and regional distributors are expanding capabilities to support localized blending, color matching, and recyclate integration, which helps OEMs meet regulatory requirements and consumer expectations for sustainability. Strategic differentiation increasingly comes from a company’s ability to offer technical services-such as failure analysis, lifecycle assessments, and design-for-recyclability consulting-alongside the polymer product. Consequently, incumbent chemical producers and nimble specialty players alike are leveraging vertical integration, targeted R&D investments, and service-oriented business models to capture value across the EV value chain.
Actionable strategic recommendations for procurement, engineering, and leadership to strengthen supply chain resilience, expedite material qualification, and advance circularity in EV programs
Industry leaders should take decisive steps to de-risk supply chains, accelerate material qualification, and embed circularity into product roadmaps. First, procurement and engineering teams must deepen collaboration through joint development agreements that align technical specifications with supplier capabilities and that include contingency clauses for trade disruptions. By integrating supplier input earlier in the design cycle, organizations can reduce the number of rework iterations and shorten validation timelines.
Second, companies should invest in regional compounding and recycling partnerships to reduce exposure to cross-border tariff volatility and to meet evolving sustainability regulations. These investments will also facilitate faster sampling and iteration, which is particularly valuable when qualifying advanced elastomers and engineered thermoplastics for thermal management and structural roles. Third, design teams should adopt a materials-first approach that prioritizes recyclability and reparability alongside performance, thereby reducing end-of-life complexity and aligning with regulatory trends. Finally, senior leaders must ensure that contractual frameworks, risk registers, and capital planning reflect the full implications of trade policy and supplier concentration risks so that strategic decisions are resilient to geopolitical and economic changes.
Transparent description of the mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical review, and scenario-based analysis to validate material and supply chain insights
This research synthesizes primary interviews with materials scientists, procurement leaders, and manufacturing engineers, together with secondary analysis of industry journals, regulatory documents, and supplier technical data sheets. Primary inputs were gathered through structured interviews and workshops that probed material performance in thermal, mechanical, and chemical environments representative of electric vehicle applications. These engagements were augmented by technical literature reviews and by benchmarking of supplier capabilities against standard qualification protocols.
Analytical methods included material performance mapping, risk exposure assessment, and scenario analysis to evaluate the implications of trade and regulatory developments on sourcing and design choices. Validation steps involved cross-referencing interview findings with supplier technical documentation and with public regulatory guidance to ensure consistency and accuracy. Transparency was maintained through documentation of interview protocols, inclusion criteria for suppliers and stakeholders, and the assumptions used in scenario construction, enabling stakeholders to understand the basis for the insights and to apply them in practical decision-making contexts.
Strategic conclusion summarizing why integrated material, supply chain, and sustainability actions are essential for long-term EV program success and resilience
Polymers are an enabling technology for electric vehicles, but realizing their full potential requires coherent alignment across design, sourcing, and sustainability strategies. The confluence of higher thermal and mechanical demands, evolving regulatory expectations, and shifting trade policies is raising the bar for material performance and supply chain resilience. As a result, organizations that move proactively to qualify performant, recyclable materials and that invest in regional supplier partnerships will be better positioned to meet delivery schedules and regulatory obligations while preserving product quality.
In closing, stakeholders should treat material decisions as strategic levers rather than purely technical choices. By integrating procurement, engineering, and sustainability goals, firms can reduce program risk, accelerate time-to-market, and create demonstrable value for customers and regulators alike. Continued investment in supplier collaboration, validation infrastructure, and circularity measures will be critical to maintaining competitiveness in the rapidly evolving EV ecosystem.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of high-performance thermoplastic elastomers for lightweight electric vehicle battery casings with enhanced safety
- 5.2. Adoption of bio-based and recycled polymer composites to reduce carbon footprint of electric vehicle components
- 5.3. Development of flame-retardant polymer blends for electric vehicle wiring harnesses and battery thermal management
- 5.4. Implementation of conductive polymer coatings to optimize thermal conductivity in electric vehicle battery packs
- 5.5. Customization of polymer electrolyte membranes for next-generation solid-state lithium battery systems in electric vehicles
- 5.6. Use of advanced polymeric adhesives for improved bonding in multi-material electric vehicle body structures
- 5.7. Advances in self-healing polymer composites for increased durability of electric vehicle exterior panels under stress
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Electric Vehicle Polymers Market, by Material Type
- 8.1. Elastomers
- 8.1.1. Acrylate Elastomers
- 8.1.2. Silicone Elastomers
- 8.1.3. Styrene-Butadiene Rubber
- 8.2. Thermoplastics
- 8.2.1. Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene
- 8.2.2. Polypropylene
- 8.2.3. Polyvinyl Chloride
- 8.3. Thermosets
- 8.3.1. Epoxy
- 8.3.2. Phenolic Resins
- 8.3.3. Polyurethane
- 9. Electric Vehicle Polymers Market, by Application
- 9.1. Exterior Components
- 9.1.1. Body Panels
- 9.1.2. Bumpers
- 9.1.3. Trunk Lids
- 9.2. Interior Components
- 9.2.1. Dashboard
- 9.2.2. Headliners
- 9.2.3. Seating
- 9.3. Powertrain Systems
- 9.3.1. Battery Housings
- 9.3.2. Cooling Pipes
- 9.3.3. Transmission Systems
- 10. Electric Vehicle Polymers Market, by Vehicle Type
- 10.1. Commercial Vehicles
- 10.1.1. Heavy Commercial Vehicles
- 10.1.2. Light Commercial Vehicles
- 10.2. Passenger Vehicles
- 11. Electric Vehicle Polymers Market, by Distribution Channel
- 11.1. Offline
- 11.2. Online
- 12. Electric Vehicle Polymers Market, by End-Use
- 12.1. Aftermarket
- 12.2. OEMs
- 13. Electric Vehicle Polymers Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Electric Vehicle Polymers Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Electric Vehicle Polymers Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. 3M Company
- 16.3.2. Addiplast SA
- 16.3.3. Aearo Technologies
- 16.3.4. AlphaGary Corporation
- 16.3.5. Arkema S.A.
- 16.3.6. Arlanxeo
- 16.3.7. Asahi Kasei Corporation
- 16.3.8. Ascend Performance Materials Holdings Inc.
- 16.3.9. BASF SE
- 16.3.10. Celanese Corporation
- 16.3.11. Chi Mei Corporation
- 16.3.12. Covestro AG
- 16.3.13. Croda International PLC
- 16.3.14. Daikin Industries Ltd.
- 16.3.15. DIC Corporation
- 16.3.16. DuPont de Nemours, Inc
- 16.3.17. Evonik Industries AG
- 16.3.18. JSR Corporation
- 16.3.19. LG Chem Ltd.
- 16.3.20. LyondellBasell Industries Holdings
- 16.3.21. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
- 16.3.22. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- 16.3.23. Solvay S.A.
- 16.3.24. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.25. Teijin Limited
- 16.3.26. The Dow Chemical Company
- 16.3.27. Toray Industries, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
