Electric Vehicle Battery Housing Market by Material Type (Aluminium, Carbon Fiber Composite, Magnesium), Electric Vehicle Type (Battery Electric Vehicle, Hybrid Electric Vehicle, Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle), Pack Structure, Vehicle Type, Sales Channe
Description
The Electric Vehicle Battery Housing Market was valued at USD 2.22 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.97 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 34.04%, reaching USD 23.24 billion by 2032.
Introduction framing the electric vehicle battery housing landscape with material advances, manufacturing hurdles, regulatory shifts, and strategic priorities
Introduction framing the electric vehicle battery housing landscape with material advances, manufacturing hurdles, regulatory shifts, and strategic priorities
The electric vehicle battery housing arena has emerged as a focal point where materials science, thermal management, and manufacturing scale converge to determine the next generation of EV performance and safety. As automakers intensify battery electrification programs, battery housings play a multiplying role: they govern structural integrity, thermal dissipation, crashworthiness, and the overall packaging efficiency of battery systems. Material engineers, supply chain managers, and product strategists now face the dual imperative of improving technical performance while driving down complexity and cost in production.
Across the value chain, choices around metals, composites, and polymer systems influence assembly methods, joining technologies, and quality control regimes. In parallel, regulatory shifts on safety standards and recycling expectations are raising the bar on design provenance and lifecycle traceability. Therefore, a comprehensive introduction must position housing design not as an isolated engineering problem but as a systemic challenge where cross-functional trade-offs determine program outcomes. This section establishes context for subsequent analysis by clarifying the major technical variables, manufacturing pressures, and policy signals that are shaping strategic decisions in battery housing development.
Transformative shifts redefining battery housing through material substitution, structural innovation, thermal control advances, and a growing sustainability imperative
Transformative shifts redefining battery housing through material substitution, structural innovation, thermal control advances, and a growing sustainability imperative
The landscape for battery housing is undergoing transformative shifts driven by concerted efforts to reduce weight, improve energy density, and meet stricter safety and environmental requirements. Material substitution from heavy steel to lightweight aluminum, magnesium, and advanced polymer and composite systems has accelerated, and each choice introduces new trade-offs in terms of crash performance, manufacturability, and cost structure. Simultaneously, carbon fiber composite approaches, whether as molding compounds or prepregs, are beginning to appear in high-performance applications where stiffness-to-weight benefits justify more complex processing.
Thermal management innovations are reshaping internal architectures, creating opportunities for integrated cooling plates, improved phase-change interfaces, and novel potting strategies that align with both module-level and pack-level housing concepts. These technical advances are paralleled by manufacturing innovation: high-pressure molding, automated layup, and hybrid joining techniques are enabling higher throughput while preserving precision. Importantly, sustainability considerations increasingly influence materials selection and end-of-life planning, prompting design-for-recycling and circularity strategies that affect supplier selection and long-term sourcing. Taken together, these shifts demand integrated roadmaps that align R&D, procurement, and production engineering to deliver resilient, scalable battery housing solutions.
Analyzing how 2025 United States tariffs cumulatively alter electric vehicle battery housing supply chains, sourcing choices, and production footprints
Analyzing how 2025 United States tariffs cumulatively alter electric vehicle battery housing supply chains, sourcing choices, and production footprints
The tariff measures implemented in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for companies sourcing battery housing components and raw materials across borders. Tariffs change the calculus for where to source casings, fasteners, and raw feedstocks such as aluminum, magnesium, and specialized polymer resins. In some cases, the incremental duties have prompted OEMs and suppliers to reassess long-standing trade routes and prioritize near-shore suppliers or in-region production to avoid tariff leakage and lead-time volatility.
Consequently, supply chain teams have increasingly evaluated total landed cost rather than unit price alone, factoring in duty exposure, logistical risk, and inventory holding strategies. These shifts encourage longer-term strategic moves, including capacity reallocation, supplier diversification, and selective vertical integration for critical subcomponents. For engineering and procurement functions, the tariffs underscore the importance of design flexibility that accommodates localized sourcing options without compromising performance or safety. At the same time, companies must manage the near-term working capital impacts of requalification and transition activities, while pursuing contractual mechanisms to mitigate cost pass-through and preserve program economics.
Segmentation insights linking material choice, EV type, vehicle class, pack design, and sales channel to performance, manufacturing ease, and aftermarket impacts
Segmentation insights linking material choice, EV type, vehicle class, pack design, and sales channel to performance, manufacturing ease, and aftermarket impacts
A robust segmentation analysis reveals how material selection drives both functional outcomes and production pathways. Aluminum offers a familiar die-cast or extrusion route that aligns with existing high-volume automotive manufacturing, while carbon fiber composite approaches-available as molding compounds or prepregs-promise superior stiffness-to-weight ratios but require higher capital investment and process control. Magnesium and polymer composite systems, including thermoplastic composite and thermoset composite variants, present intermediate options with distinct joining and thermal properties that influence crash behavior and manufacturability.
When viewed by EV type, battery electric vehicles trend toward higher structural integration and thermal performance as primary priorities, whereas hybrid and plug-in hybrid platforms may prioritize modularity and cost-effective packaging. Vehicle class further modifies these drivers: commercial vehicles, split into heavy and light commercial segments, often emphasize durability and thermal robustness, while passenger cars prioritize packaging efficiency and weight savings. Pack architecture choices-module level housing versus pack level housing-translate into different integration requirements; module-level designs subdivided into cylindrical, pouch, and prismatic module formats require tailored housing geometries and thermal interfaces. Finally, sales channel considerations, including original equipment manufacturer and aftermarket pathways, influence design for serviceability, spare part logistics, and lifecycle documentation. Integrated segmentation thinking therefore links technical trade-offs to pragmatic manufacturing and aftermarket realities.
Regional dynamics across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific that influence battery housing supply resilience, policy interplay, and manufacturing investment
Regional dynamics across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific that influence battery housing supply resilience, policy interplay, and manufacturing investment
Regional variation in policy, industrial capability, and supplier ecosystems strongly shapes strategic options for battery housing. In the Americas, a combination of policy incentives and a growing automotive electrification market supports investment in localized aluminum casting and sheet metal forming, with expanding interest in polymer processing capacity to reduce import dependency. Transition strategies in this region frequently emphasize supply resilience, onshoring critical components, and leveraging existing automotive supplier networks to accelerate qualification timelines.
In Europe, Middle East, and Africa, regulatory stringency around safety, recyclability, and emissions fosters a premium on designs that demonstrate traceability and recyclability. Strong clusters of advanced composite capability coexist with mature metal forming and machining ecosystems, prompting hybrid sourcing strategies that balance innovation and manufacturability. Asia-Pacific remains a dominant manufacturing hub with deep capabilities in high-volume metal forming, magnesium die casting, and polymer processing, alongside rapidly maturing composite supply chains. Policy support in several APAC markets, combined with dense supplier networks, enables rapid scale-up, but also requires careful navigation of regional trade measures and intellectual property considerations. Across regions, capital deployment decisions reflect local labor cost structures, proximity to OEM assembly plants, and regulatory incentives that together determine where housing production and value-added integration will coalesce.
Corporate maneuvers by battery housing suppliers and integrators highlighting strategic partnerships, technology investment, vertical integration, and IP focus
Corporate maneuvers by battery housing suppliers and integrators highlighting strategic partnerships, technology investment, vertical integration, and IP focus
Market participants are pursuing a mix of strategic partnerships, targeted technology investments, and selective vertical integration to capture value within the battery housing ecosystem. Suppliers that previously focused solely on stamped metal housings are investing in joining technologies, sealing systems, and thermal interface integration to offer more complete modules. Meanwhile, specialist composite firms seek collaborations with automotive tier suppliers and OEM engineering teams to reduce technical risk and accelerate qualification timelines.
Technology investment highlights include automation for composite layup, improved adhesive and weld processes for hybrid material systems, and enhanced nondestructive testing for quality assurance. Several players are integrating upstream feedstock capabilities or downstream finishing and assembly operations to tighten control over lead times and cost variability. Intellectual property strategies have shifted toward building protected solution stacks that combine design, process know-how, and testing protocols. As competition intensifies, companies that align product roadmaps with OEM system requirements, invest in demonstrable quality and cycle time improvements, and pursue pragmatic partnerships will be better positioned to secure long-term supply agreements.
Practical recommendations for leaders to refine battery housing strategy across material selection, supply resilience, partners, and regulatory readiness
Practical recommendations for leaders to refine battery housing strategy across material selection, supply resilience, partners, and regulatory readiness
Leadership teams should prioritize a phased decision framework that aligns materials strategy with program timelines and supplier capabilities. Begin by mapping critical performance requirements-structural, thermal, safety, and reparability-and then validate candidate materials against manufacturability criteria and supplier capacity. Early-stage prototyping and pilot production runs reduce downstream risk and inform realistic qualification timelines, enabling procurement to commit with greater confidence.
To strengthen supply resilience, build dual-source strategies where feasible and qualify regional suppliers to mitigate exposure to trade disruptions. Engage in collaborative development agreements with strategic partners to share tooling costs and reduce time-to-market. Investing in modular designs that can accommodate alternative materials or pack-level modularity reduces the cost of supplier transitions. From a regulatory perspective, proactively document material provenance, recyclability attributes, and testing records to accelerate homologation. Finally, embed continuous improvement loops between engineering, manufacturing, and procurement to ensure that design choices remain adaptive as production scales and external conditions evolve.
Methodology outlining primary and secondary research, expert interviews, supply chain mapping, materials evaluation, and rigorous validation protocols
Methodology outlining primary and secondary research, expert interviews, supply chain mapping, materials evaluation, and rigorous validation protocols
The research approach combined primary engagement with industry experts, engineers, and procurement leaders alongside secondary analysis of technical literature, regulatory guidance, and publicly available supplier disclosures. Primary interviews provided insight into current qualification practices, supplier capabilities, and operational constraints, while secondary materials supported cross-validation of observed trends and technology maturities. Supply chain mapping identified critical nodes for raw materials and subassembly capability, emphasizing chokepoints and potential areas for near-shore investment.
Materials evaluation reviewed the performance attributes and processing requirements of metals, composites, and polymer systems, with particular attention to joining, sealing, and thermal interface considerations. Validation protocols included scenario analysis to assess how policy shifts and trade measures alter sourcing decisions, and cross-checks with case examples of recent supplier transitions. Throughout, the methodology prioritized traceable evidence and expert corroboration to ensure that conclusions reflect both technical feasibility and practical implementation pathways.
Conclusion synthesizing implications across materials, manufacturing, policy, partnerships, and regional dynamics that will influence battery housing decisions
Conclusion synthesizing implications across materials, manufacturing, policy, partnerships, and regional dynamics that will influence battery housing decisions
This analysis demonstrates that battery housing decisions are consequential across product performance, manufacturing strategy, and long-term supply resilience. Materials choices carry implications well beyond weight and cost; they reshape joining strategies, thermal approaches, and end-of-life pathways. Manufacturing readiness and regional production footprints will remain decisive as companies respond to evolving policy, tariff regimes, and OEM program priorities.
Strategic clarity requires cross-functional alignment: design teams must build options that procurement and operations can implement at scale, and commercial teams must anticipate regulatory and trade dynamics that influence sourcing. Partnerships and targeted investments can bridge capability gaps, while modular design thinking preserves optionality in the face of changing market conditions. In summary, organizations that integrate materials science, manufacturing pragmatism, and proactive supply chain management will be best equipped to deliver safe, efficient, and scalable battery housing solutions.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Introduction framing the electric vehicle battery housing landscape with material advances, manufacturing hurdles, regulatory shifts, and strategic priorities
Introduction framing the electric vehicle battery housing landscape with material advances, manufacturing hurdles, regulatory shifts, and strategic priorities
The electric vehicle battery housing arena has emerged as a focal point where materials science, thermal management, and manufacturing scale converge to determine the next generation of EV performance and safety. As automakers intensify battery electrification programs, battery housings play a multiplying role: they govern structural integrity, thermal dissipation, crashworthiness, and the overall packaging efficiency of battery systems. Material engineers, supply chain managers, and product strategists now face the dual imperative of improving technical performance while driving down complexity and cost in production.
Across the value chain, choices around metals, composites, and polymer systems influence assembly methods, joining technologies, and quality control regimes. In parallel, regulatory shifts on safety standards and recycling expectations are raising the bar on design provenance and lifecycle traceability. Therefore, a comprehensive introduction must position housing design not as an isolated engineering problem but as a systemic challenge where cross-functional trade-offs determine program outcomes. This section establishes context for subsequent analysis by clarifying the major technical variables, manufacturing pressures, and policy signals that are shaping strategic decisions in battery housing development.
Transformative shifts redefining battery housing through material substitution, structural innovation, thermal control advances, and a growing sustainability imperative
Transformative shifts redefining battery housing through material substitution, structural innovation, thermal control advances, and a growing sustainability imperative
The landscape for battery housing is undergoing transformative shifts driven by concerted efforts to reduce weight, improve energy density, and meet stricter safety and environmental requirements. Material substitution from heavy steel to lightweight aluminum, magnesium, and advanced polymer and composite systems has accelerated, and each choice introduces new trade-offs in terms of crash performance, manufacturability, and cost structure. Simultaneously, carbon fiber composite approaches, whether as molding compounds or prepregs, are beginning to appear in high-performance applications where stiffness-to-weight benefits justify more complex processing.
Thermal management innovations are reshaping internal architectures, creating opportunities for integrated cooling plates, improved phase-change interfaces, and novel potting strategies that align with both module-level and pack-level housing concepts. These technical advances are paralleled by manufacturing innovation: high-pressure molding, automated layup, and hybrid joining techniques are enabling higher throughput while preserving precision. Importantly, sustainability considerations increasingly influence materials selection and end-of-life planning, prompting design-for-recycling and circularity strategies that affect supplier selection and long-term sourcing. Taken together, these shifts demand integrated roadmaps that align R&D, procurement, and production engineering to deliver resilient, scalable battery housing solutions.
Analyzing how 2025 United States tariffs cumulatively alter electric vehicle battery housing supply chains, sourcing choices, and production footprints
Analyzing how 2025 United States tariffs cumulatively alter electric vehicle battery housing supply chains, sourcing choices, and production footprints
The tariff measures implemented in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for companies sourcing battery housing components and raw materials across borders. Tariffs change the calculus for where to source casings, fasteners, and raw feedstocks such as aluminum, magnesium, and specialized polymer resins. In some cases, the incremental duties have prompted OEMs and suppliers to reassess long-standing trade routes and prioritize near-shore suppliers or in-region production to avoid tariff leakage and lead-time volatility.
Consequently, supply chain teams have increasingly evaluated total landed cost rather than unit price alone, factoring in duty exposure, logistical risk, and inventory holding strategies. These shifts encourage longer-term strategic moves, including capacity reallocation, supplier diversification, and selective vertical integration for critical subcomponents. For engineering and procurement functions, the tariffs underscore the importance of design flexibility that accommodates localized sourcing options without compromising performance or safety. At the same time, companies must manage the near-term working capital impacts of requalification and transition activities, while pursuing contractual mechanisms to mitigate cost pass-through and preserve program economics.
Segmentation insights linking material choice, EV type, vehicle class, pack design, and sales channel to performance, manufacturing ease, and aftermarket impacts
Segmentation insights linking material choice, EV type, vehicle class, pack design, and sales channel to performance, manufacturing ease, and aftermarket impacts
A robust segmentation analysis reveals how material selection drives both functional outcomes and production pathways. Aluminum offers a familiar die-cast or extrusion route that aligns with existing high-volume automotive manufacturing, while carbon fiber composite approaches-available as molding compounds or prepregs-promise superior stiffness-to-weight ratios but require higher capital investment and process control. Magnesium and polymer composite systems, including thermoplastic composite and thermoset composite variants, present intermediate options with distinct joining and thermal properties that influence crash behavior and manufacturability.
When viewed by EV type, battery electric vehicles trend toward higher structural integration and thermal performance as primary priorities, whereas hybrid and plug-in hybrid platforms may prioritize modularity and cost-effective packaging. Vehicle class further modifies these drivers: commercial vehicles, split into heavy and light commercial segments, often emphasize durability and thermal robustness, while passenger cars prioritize packaging efficiency and weight savings. Pack architecture choices-module level housing versus pack level housing-translate into different integration requirements; module-level designs subdivided into cylindrical, pouch, and prismatic module formats require tailored housing geometries and thermal interfaces. Finally, sales channel considerations, including original equipment manufacturer and aftermarket pathways, influence design for serviceability, spare part logistics, and lifecycle documentation. Integrated segmentation thinking therefore links technical trade-offs to pragmatic manufacturing and aftermarket realities.
Regional dynamics across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific that influence battery housing supply resilience, policy interplay, and manufacturing investment
Regional dynamics across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific that influence battery housing supply resilience, policy interplay, and manufacturing investment
Regional variation in policy, industrial capability, and supplier ecosystems strongly shapes strategic options for battery housing. In the Americas, a combination of policy incentives and a growing automotive electrification market supports investment in localized aluminum casting and sheet metal forming, with expanding interest in polymer processing capacity to reduce import dependency. Transition strategies in this region frequently emphasize supply resilience, onshoring critical components, and leveraging existing automotive supplier networks to accelerate qualification timelines.
In Europe, Middle East, and Africa, regulatory stringency around safety, recyclability, and emissions fosters a premium on designs that demonstrate traceability and recyclability. Strong clusters of advanced composite capability coexist with mature metal forming and machining ecosystems, prompting hybrid sourcing strategies that balance innovation and manufacturability. Asia-Pacific remains a dominant manufacturing hub with deep capabilities in high-volume metal forming, magnesium die casting, and polymer processing, alongside rapidly maturing composite supply chains. Policy support in several APAC markets, combined with dense supplier networks, enables rapid scale-up, but also requires careful navigation of regional trade measures and intellectual property considerations. Across regions, capital deployment decisions reflect local labor cost structures, proximity to OEM assembly plants, and regulatory incentives that together determine where housing production and value-added integration will coalesce.
Corporate maneuvers by battery housing suppliers and integrators highlighting strategic partnerships, technology investment, vertical integration, and IP focus
Corporate maneuvers by battery housing suppliers and integrators highlighting strategic partnerships, technology investment, vertical integration, and IP focus
Market participants are pursuing a mix of strategic partnerships, targeted technology investments, and selective vertical integration to capture value within the battery housing ecosystem. Suppliers that previously focused solely on stamped metal housings are investing in joining technologies, sealing systems, and thermal interface integration to offer more complete modules. Meanwhile, specialist composite firms seek collaborations with automotive tier suppliers and OEM engineering teams to reduce technical risk and accelerate qualification timelines.
Technology investment highlights include automation for composite layup, improved adhesive and weld processes for hybrid material systems, and enhanced nondestructive testing for quality assurance. Several players are integrating upstream feedstock capabilities or downstream finishing and assembly operations to tighten control over lead times and cost variability. Intellectual property strategies have shifted toward building protected solution stacks that combine design, process know-how, and testing protocols. As competition intensifies, companies that align product roadmaps with OEM system requirements, invest in demonstrable quality and cycle time improvements, and pursue pragmatic partnerships will be better positioned to secure long-term supply agreements.
Practical recommendations for leaders to refine battery housing strategy across material selection, supply resilience, partners, and regulatory readiness
Practical recommendations for leaders to refine battery housing strategy across material selection, supply resilience, partners, and regulatory readiness
Leadership teams should prioritize a phased decision framework that aligns materials strategy with program timelines and supplier capabilities. Begin by mapping critical performance requirements-structural, thermal, safety, and reparability-and then validate candidate materials against manufacturability criteria and supplier capacity. Early-stage prototyping and pilot production runs reduce downstream risk and inform realistic qualification timelines, enabling procurement to commit with greater confidence.
To strengthen supply resilience, build dual-source strategies where feasible and qualify regional suppliers to mitigate exposure to trade disruptions. Engage in collaborative development agreements with strategic partners to share tooling costs and reduce time-to-market. Investing in modular designs that can accommodate alternative materials or pack-level modularity reduces the cost of supplier transitions. From a regulatory perspective, proactively document material provenance, recyclability attributes, and testing records to accelerate homologation. Finally, embed continuous improvement loops between engineering, manufacturing, and procurement to ensure that design choices remain adaptive as production scales and external conditions evolve.
Methodology outlining primary and secondary research, expert interviews, supply chain mapping, materials evaluation, and rigorous validation protocols
Methodology outlining primary and secondary research, expert interviews, supply chain mapping, materials evaluation, and rigorous validation protocols
The research approach combined primary engagement with industry experts, engineers, and procurement leaders alongside secondary analysis of technical literature, regulatory guidance, and publicly available supplier disclosures. Primary interviews provided insight into current qualification practices, supplier capabilities, and operational constraints, while secondary materials supported cross-validation of observed trends and technology maturities. Supply chain mapping identified critical nodes for raw materials and subassembly capability, emphasizing chokepoints and potential areas for near-shore investment.
Materials evaluation reviewed the performance attributes and processing requirements of metals, composites, and polymer systems, with particular attention to joining, sealing, and thermal interface considerations. Validation protocols included scenario analysis to assess how policy shifts and trade measures alter sourcing decisions, and cross-checks with case examples of recent supplier transitions. Throughout, the methodology prioritized traceable evidence and expert corroboration to ensure that conclusions reflect both technical feasibility and practical implementation pathways.
Conclusion synthesizing implications across materials, manufacturing, policy, partnerships, and regional dynamics that will influence battery housing decisions
Conclusion synthesizing implications across materials, manufacturing, policy, partnerships, and regional dynamics that will influence battery housing decisions
This analysis demonstrates that battery housing decisions are consequential across product performance, manufacturing strategy, and long-term supply resilience. Materials choices carry implications well beyond weight and cost; they reshape joining strategies, thermal approaches, and end-of-life pathways. Manufacturing readiness and regional production footprints will remain decisive as companies respond to evolving policy, tariff regimes, and OEM program priorities.
Strategic clarity requires cross-functional alignment: design teams must build options that procurement and operations can implement at scale, and commercial teams must anticipate regulatory and trade dynamics that influence sourcing. Partnerships and targeted investments can bridge capability gaps, while modular design thinking preserves optionality in the face of changing market conditions. In summary, organizations that integrate materials science, manufacturing pragmatism, and proactive supply chain management will be best equipped to deliver safe, efficient, and scalable battery housing solutions.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
195 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of high-strength aluminum alloy battery housings to improve EV energy density and structural safety
- 5.2. Integration of advanced phase change materials in battery housings for enhanced thermal management under extreme conditions
- 5.3. Development of modular battery housing designs to accelerate assembly and simplify end-of-life recycling processes
- 5.4. Implementation of multi-material hybrid housings combining plastics and metals to balance weight, cost, and durability
- 5.5. Advances in structural foam molding techniques for lightweight, impact-resistant EV battery enclosures
- 5.6. Adoption of integrated sensor networks within battery housings for real-time monitoring of temperature and pressure anomalies
- 5.7. Use of high-pressure die-cast magnesium in battery frames to reduce vehicle mass while maintaining crash resilience
- 5.8. Emergence of 3D-printed battery housings enabling complex geometries and rapid prototyping for custom EV platforms
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Electric Vehicle Battery Housing Market, by Material Type
- 8.1. Aluminium
- 8.2. Carbon Fiber Composite
- 8.2.1. Molding Compound
- 8.2.2. Prepreg
- 8.3. Magnesium
- 8.4. Polymer Composite
- 8.4.1. Thermoplastic Composite
- 8.4.2. Thermoset Composite
- 8.5. Steel
- 9. Electric Vehicle Battery Housing Market, by Electric Vehicle Type
- 9.1. Battery Electric Vehicle
- 9.2. Hybrid Electric Vehicle
- 9.3. Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle
- 10. Electric Vehicle Battery Housing Market, by Pack Structure
- 10.1. Module Level Housing
- 10.1.1. Cylindrical Module
- 10.1.2. Pouch Module
- 10.1.3. Prismatic Module
- 10.2. Pack Level Housing
- 11. Electric Vehicle Battery Housing Market, by Vehicle Type
- 11.1. Commercial Vehicle
- 11.1.1. Heavy Commercial Vehicle
- 11.1.2. Light Commercial Vehicle
- 11.2. Passenger Car
- 12. Electric Vehicle Battery Housing Market, by Sales Channel
- 12.1. Aftermarket
- 12.2. Original Equipment Manufacturer
- 13. Electric Vehicle Battery Housing Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Electric Vehicle Battery Housing Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Electric Vehicle Battery Housing Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. BASF SE
- 16.3.2. Constellium SE
- 16.3.3. Covestro AG
- 16.3.4. Electric Vehicle Battery Housing
- 16.3.5. EMP Die Casting Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.6. Evonik Industries AG
- 16.3.7. FEV Group
- 16.3.8. Gestamp Automocion, S.A.
- 16.3.9. GF Casting Solutions
- 16.3.10. Hanwha Advanced Materials
- 16.3.11. Henkel AG & Co.KGaA
- 16.3.12. Magna International Inc.
- 16.3.13. Minth Group
- 16.3.14. Mitsubishi Chemical Group
- 16.3.15. Norsk Hydro ASA
- 16.3.16. Novelis Inc.
- 16.3.17. POSCO
- 16.3.18. SGL Carbon
- 16.3.19. Solvay SA
- 16.3.20. SSAB AB
- 16.3.21. Teijin Limited
- 16.3.22. Thyssenkrupp AG
- 16.3.23. UACJ Corporation
- 16.3.24. Voestalpine AG
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
