Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market by Adhesive Type (Acrylic Adhesive, Epoxy Adhesive, Polyurethane Adhesive), Application Method (Automated Dispensing, Manual Dispensing), Vehicle Type, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market was valued at USD 941.94 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1,214.30 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 30.37%, reaching USD 7,864.18 million by 2032.
Understand how adhesive materials and processes have become mission-critical enablers of electric vehicle performance reliability manufacturability and regulatory compliance
Electric vehicle design and assembly have elevated adhesives from supporting materials to core enablers of performance, safety, and manufacturability. Adhesives now play critical roles across battery pack assembly, structural bonding, sealing, electromagnetic interference mitigation, and thermal management, intersecting materials science with high-volume automotive production realities. As vehicle architectures evolve toward larger battery capacities and greater electrification, adhesives must meet increasingly stringent mechanical, thermal, electrical, and regulatory requirements without introducing assembly complexity or long-term reliability risks.
Consequently, stakeholders across engineering, procurement, and supplier management require concise, technically grounded insight into adhesive chemistries, process compatibility, and lifecycle behavior. This executive summary synthesizes that intelligence for decision-makers, translating laboratory performance attributes into shop-floor considerations and commercial trade-offs. It emphasizes where adhesives deliver distinct value in electric vehicle platforms, highlights friction points in manufacturing integration, and outlines pragmatic steps companies can take to align material selection with production cadence and regulatory timelines.
Throughout the analysis, emphasis remains on bridging technical feasibility with operational practicality so that leaders can make confident, evidence-based choices that support vehicle performance targets while minimizing integration risk.
Explore the converging innovations in adhesive chemistries manufacturing automation and sustainability that are reshaping electric vehicle assembly and product design
The adhesive landscape within the electric vehicle sector is undergoing rapid, transformative shifts driven by converging forces in materials innovation, manufacturing automation, and regulatory focus. Advanced chemistries now deliver combinations of mechanical strength, thermal conductivity, and electrical performance that were previously mutually exclusive, enabling designers to reduce fasteners and improve pack structural integrity while managing heat and electrical isolation. At the same time, production systems are shifting toward higher degrees of automation, increasing demand for adhesives compatible with automated dispensing, cure-time reduction, and in-line quality inspection.
Moreover, sustainability and end-of-life considerations are influencing formulation choices and supplier selection criteria. Manufacturers seek adhesives that enable recyclability or reduce contaminant burdens without sacrificing performance. Concurrently, design teams are prioritizing solutions that reduce vehicle mass and improve energy density, thereby extending range while preserving safety margins. These technical and operational shifts are prompting suppliers to offer integrated service models that include application engineering, on-site process integration, and lifecycle testing to accelerate adoption in mass-production environments.
As a result, companies that align R&D, process engineering, and procurement around adhesive selection and application will unlock the most immediate gains in assembly efficiency, vehicle durability, and regulatory readiness.
Assess how recent tariff developments and trade policy shifts are accelerating supplier regionalization and reshaping sourcing strategies across the adhesive value chain
Recent trade policy adjustments affecting tariffs and import duties have amplified strategic reassessment across the adhesive value chain, with meaningful implications for sourcing, supplier footprint, and component qualification timelines. Tariff-related cost pressures have catalyzed a re-evaluation of supplier geographies and total landed cost models, accelerating trends toward regionalization and nearshoring in order to preserve lead-time reliability and reduce exposure to trade volatility.
Consequently, procurement teams have intensified dual-sourcing strategies and broadened technical qualification pipelines to include suppliers with local production capability or proven logistics resilience. These shifts have a cascading effect: engineering schedules and prototype cycles must account for validated secondary suppliers and alternative chemistries that can meet the same performance parameters while fitting into revised procurement frameworks. Furthermore, supply chain teams are increasingly factoring regulatory compliance, customs complexity, and tariff mitigation into long-term sourcing decisions to stabilize production ramp-ups.
In summary, tariff developments have reinforced the importance of supply-chain agility and regional production presence. Stakeholders should therefore prioritize supplier partnerships that combine technical competence with flexible manufacturing footprints to mitigate disruption and maintain continuity of adhesive supply during critical production ramps.
Dissect adhesive chemistries application methods and end-use role differentiation to align materials selection with assembly processes performance targets and service models
Clear segmentation of adhesives by chemistry, application method, usage, vehicle architecture, and end customer illuminates where technical and commercial choices will matter most. Adhesive chemistries such as acrylic, epoxy, polyurethane, and silicone each bring distinct mechanical, thermal, and cure-profile characteristics that inform selection criteria for battery containment, structural bonding, and sealing functions. In parallel, application methods split between automated dispensing and manual dispensing, with automation favored where precision, cycle time, and repeatability are paramount, while manual approaches remain relevant for low-volume variants and complex geometry touch-ups.
Applications span battery pack assembly, EMI shielding, sealing and gasketing, structural bonding, and thermal management. EMI shielding is further differentiated into conductive adhesives and epoxy-based EMI adhesives, with conductive systems delivering both electrical continuity and shielding while epoxies offer structural robustness. Thermal management solutions are subdivided into phase change materials and thermal gap fillers, each addressing different thermal impedance and mechanical compliance needs. Vehicle types influence adhesive requirements because battery electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles present divergent packaging constraints, voltage architectures, and durability expectations. End-user channels divide between aftermarket and OEM segments, where OEM integration demands rigorous qualification and lifecycle verification while aftermarket solutions prioritize ease of application, compatibility across model years, and serviceability.
Taken together, this segmentation framework helps engineers and procurement specialists match adhesive selection to functional requirements, manufacturing processes, and commercial constraints to reduce integration risk and accelerate validation.
Examine how regional regulatory priorities manufacturing footprints and supplier ecosystems influence adhesive selection supply resilience and validation speed across global EV hubs
Regional dynamics play a pivotal role in shaping adhesive availability, regulatory pressures, and localized technical support capabilities across the global electric vehicle ecosystem. In the Americas, demand for adhesives aligns with strong EV development hubs and significant aftermarket activity, creating pressure for supply chains that can support high-volume assembly and rapid prototyping while meeting regional emissions and safety harmonization. This region also emphasizes close collaboration between adhesive suppliers and OEMs to optimize process integration and to localize formulations that match climatic and durability profiles.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency and a growing emphasis on sustainability influence adhesive formulation and packaging, with manufacturers prioritizing low-emission chemistries and recyclability credentials. The region’s dense supplier networks and advanced testing infrastructure support rapid materials validation, but they also require suppliers to meet high compliance and documentation standards. In Asia-Pacific, a concentration of OEM manufacturing and major battery production facilities drives intensity in qualification cycles, cost optimization, and scale. Suppliers in this region often provide integrated on-site engineering services to enable rapid ramp-up and process automation. Overall, regional strategies must balance technical requirements, regulatory compliance, and logistics considerations to ensure consistent adhesive performance across diverse vehicle programs.
Understand how supplier differentiation is shifting toward integrated materials application services resilient regional footprints and targeted innovations in battery and thermal adhesive solutions
Supplier strategies and competitive positioning are increasingly defined by the ability to couple advanced materials with application engineering and service continuity. Leading adhesive producers have invested in specialized product lines for battery adhesion, thermally conductive gap fillers, and conductive EMI solutions, while differentiating through application-support services such as automated dispensing integration, in-line metrology recommendations, and on-site process qualification. Larger incumbents leverage broad formulation portfolios to serve both OEM development cycles and aftermarket product lines, enabling cross-program knowledge transfer and scale advantages in raw-material sourcing.
Smaller, specialized firms differentiate through rapid innovation cycles and niche focus, for example concentrating on phase change materials or highly conductive adhesives tailored to compact battery modules. These suppliers often partner with system integrators and testing labs to accelerate qualification, offering tailored aging and vibration protocols. Meanwhile, contract manufacturers and tier-one adhesive formulators emphasize regional capacity and logistical reliability to support zero-defect production ramps. Across the landscape, strategic partnerships between material scientists, equipment OEMs, and vehicle manufacturers accelerate adoption by aligning chemistry performance with dispensing technology and process controls.
As a result, commercial success stems from an integrated value proposition: proven product performance combined with demonstrable application expertise and a resilient supply footprint that reduces qualification friction for vehicle programs.
Adopt a prioritized set of actions to integrate adhesive selection into early design automation qualification and supplier diversification to reduce risk and accelerate production ramps
Industry leaders should take a sequence of targeted actions to capture immediate productivity gains while safeguarding against supply and regulatory risk. First, embed adhesive selection early in the vehicle architecture and design-for-manufacturing discussions so that chemistry, cure profiles, and dispensing constraints become design inputs rather than late-stage fixes. Early alignment reduces rework and shortens validation cycles, enabling smoother production ramps.
Second, prioritize process automation where repeatability and cycle time materially affect cost and quality; invest in proof-of-concept lines to validate automated dispensing, cure controls, and in-line inspection. Third, diversify supplier pools by qualifying at least one geographically proximate alternative supplier and validating cross-compatible chemistries to reduce exposure to trade or logistics shocks. Fourth, incorporate end-of-life and recyclability criteria into adhesive specification to meet tightening regulatory expectations and to lower downstream dismantling costs. Finally, develop collaborative test protocols with suppliers that simulate real-world thermal cycling, vibration, and chemical exposure to ensure adhesives meet long-term durability targets. By following these actions in parallel, leaders will improve time-to-production, reduce integration risk, and create a defensible advantage in both OEM programs and aftermarket service offerings.
Review the structured research approach combining primary interviews materials characterization site observations and scenario-based risk analysis to deliver actionable technical insights
The research underpinning this executive summary combines qualitative interviews, materials characterization review, and applied process observation to ensure findings are actionable and technically grounded. Primary information was gathered through structured interviews with materials scientists, assembly engineers, procurement leads, and tier-one adhesive suppliers, focusing on performance trade-offs, qualification timelines, and supply-chain constraints. Secondary technical sources included peer-reviewed materials science literature, publicly available regulatory documents, and manufacturer technical datasheets to cross-validate performance attributes and application constraints.
In addition, the methodology incorporated a comparative analysis of application methods and production workflows through site visits and virtual process reviews, enabling assessment of automation readiness and dispensing compatibility across representative assembly environments. Risk analysis considered supplier footprint, logistics complexity, and regulatory compliance obligations, while scenario-based sensitivity checks evaluated the operational impact of alternative sourcing and chemistry substitution. Throughout the process, emphasis remained on practical relevance: test protocols and selection criteria were framed to be adoptable by engineering and procurement teams during vehicle development and production ramp phases.
Conclude with a concise synthesis showing how strategic adhesive management unlocks design performance production resilience and regulatory alignment for electric vehicle programs
Adhesives are now central to the performance, safety, and manufacturability of electric vehicles, and their strategic management can materially influence program outcomes. Across chemistry innovation, application automation, and supplier strategy, clear opportunities exist to reduce integration friction, enhance thermal and electrical performance, and improve production resilience. At the same time, evolving regulatory priorities and trade dynamics demand proactive attention to supply-chain design and material compliance.
Moving forward, companies that integrate adhesive selection into early-stage design, invest in automation where it drives repeatability, and develop supplier contingency plans will reduce validation timelines and exposure to disruption. Furthermore, adopting sustainability and end-of-life considerations within adhesive specifications will position organizations to meet regulatory expectations and evolving consumer preferences. In short, treating adhesives as strategic engineering elements rather than ancillary materials unlocks both product and operational advantages that translate into safer, more efficient, and more competitive electric vehicle programs.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Understand how adhesive materials and processes have become mission-critical enablers of electric vehicle performance reliability manufacturability and regulatory compliance
Electric vehicle design and assembly have elevated adhesives from supporting materials to core enablers of performance, safety, and manufacturability. Adhesives now play critical roles across battery pack assembly, structural bonding, sealing, electromagnetic interference mitigation, and thermal management, intersecting materials science with high-volume automotive production realities. As vehicle architectures evolve toward larger battery capacities and greater electrification, adhesives must meet increasingly stringent mechanical, thermal, electrical, and regulatory requirements without introducing assembly complexity or long-term reliability risks.
Consequently, stakeholders across engineering, procurement, and supplier management require concise, technically grounded insight into adhesive chemistries, process compatibility, and lifecycle behavior. This executive summary synthesizes that intelligence for decision-makers, translating laboratory performance attributes into shop-floor considerations and commercial trade-offs. It emphasizes where adhesives deliver distinct value in electric vehicle platforms, highlights friction points in manufacturing integration, and outlines pragmatic steps companies can take to align material selection with production cadence and regulatory timelines.
Throughout the analysis, emphasis remains on bridging technical feasibility with operational practicality so that leaders can make confident, evidence-based choices that support vehicle performance targets while minimizing integration risk.
Explore the converging innovations in adhesive chemistries manufacturing automation and sustainability that are reshaping electric vehicle assembly and product design
The adhesive landscape within the electric vehicle sector is undergoing rapid, transformative shifts driven by converging forces in materials innovation, manufacturing automation, and regulatory focus. Advanced chemistries now deliver combinations of mechanical strength, thermal conductivity, and electrical performance that were previously mutually exclusive, enabling designers to reduce fasteners and improve pack structural integrity while managing heat and electrical isolation. At the same time, production systems are shifting toward higher degrees of automation, increasing demand for adhesives compatible with automated dispensing, cure-time reduction, and in-line quality inspection.
Moreover, sustainability and end-of-life considerations are influencing formulation choices and supplier selection criteria. Manufacturers seek adhesives that enable recyclability or reduce contaminant burdens without sacrificing performance. Concurrently, design teams are prioritizing solutions that reduce vehicle mass and improve energy density, thereby extending range while preserving safety margins. These technical and operational shifts are prompting suppliers to offer integrated service models that include application engineering, on-site process integration, and lifecycle testing to accelerate adoption in mass-production environments.
As a result, companies that align R&D, process engineering, and procurement around adhesive selection and application will unlock the most immediate gains in assembly efficiency, vehicle durability, and regulatory readiness.
Assess how recent tariff developments and trade policy shifts are accelerating supplier regionalization and reshaping sourcing strategies across the adhesive value chain
Recent trade policy adjustments affecting tariffs and import duties have amplified strategic reassessment across the adhesive value chain, with meaningful implications for sourcing, supplier footprint, and component qualification timelines. Tariff-related cost pressures have catalyzed a re-evaluation of supplier geographies and total landed cost models, accelerating trends toward regionalization and nearshoring in order to preserve lead-time reliability and reduce exposure to trade volatility.
Consequently, procurement teams have intensified dual-sourcing strategies and broadened technical qualification pipelines to include suppliers with local production capability or proven logistics resilience. These shifts have a cascading effect: engineering schedules and prototype cycles must account for validated secondary suppliers and alternative chemistries that can meet the same performance parameters while fitting into revised procurement frameworks. Furthermore, supply chain teams are increasingly factoring regulatory compliance, customs complexity, and tariff mitigation into long-term sourcing decisions to stabilize production ramp-ups.
In summary, tariff developments have reinforced the importance of supply-chain agility and regional production presence. Stakeholders should therefore prioritize supplier partnerships that combine technical competence with flexible manufacturing footprints to mitigate disruption and maintain continuity of adhesive supply during critical production ramps.
Dissect adhesive chemistries application methods and end-use role differentiation to align materials selection with assembly processes performance targets and service models
Clear segmentation of adhesives by chemistry, application method, usage, vehicle architecture, and end customer illuminates where technical and commercial choices will matter most. Adhesive chemistries such as acrylic, epoxy, polyurethane, and silicone each bring distinct mechanical, thermal, and cure-profile characteristics that inform selection criteria for battery containment, structural bonding, and sealing functions. In parallel, application methods split between automated dispensing and manual dispensing, with automation favored where precision, cycle time, and repeatability are paramount, while manual approaches remain relevant for low-volume variants and complex geometry touch-ups.
Applications span battery pack assembly, EMI shielding, sealing and gasketing, structural bonding, and thermal management. EMI shielding is further differentiated into conductive adhesives and epoxy-based EMI adhesives, with conductive systems delivering both electrical continuity and shielding while epoxies offer structural robustness. Thermal management solutions are subdivided into phase change materials and thermal gap fillers, each addressing different thermal impedance and mechanical compliance needs. Vehicle types influence adhesive requirements because battery electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles present divergent packaging constraints, voltage architectures, and durability expectations. End-user channels divide between aftermarket and OEM segments, where OEM integration demands rigorous qualification and lifecycle verification while aftermarket solutions prioritize ease of application, compatibility across model years, and serviceability.
Taken together, this segmentation framework helps engineers and procurement specialists match adhesive selection to functional requirements, manufacturing processes, and commercial constraints to reduce integration risk and accelerate validation.
Examine how regional regulatory priorities manufacturing footprints and supplier ecosystems influence adhesive selection supply resilience and validation speed across global EV hubs
Regional dynamics play a pivotal role in shaping adhesive availability, regulatory pressures, and localized technical support capabilities across the global electric vehicle ecosystem. In the Americas, demand for adhesives aligns with strong EV development hubs and significant aftermarket activity, creating pressure for supply chains that can support high-volume assembly and rapid prototyping while meeting regional emissions and safety harmonization. This region also emphasizes close collaboration between adhesive suppliers and OEMs to optimize process integration and to localize formulations that match climatic and durability profiles.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency and a growing emphasis on sustainability influence adhesive formulation and packaging, with manufacturers prioritizing low-emission chemistries and recyclability credentials. The region’s dense supplier networks and advanced testing infrastructure support rapid materials validation, but they also require suppliers to meet high compliance and documentation standards. In Asia-Pacific, a concentration of OEM manufacturing and major battery production facilities drives intensity in qualification cycles, cost optimization, and scale. Suppliers in this region often provide integrated on-site engineering services to enable rapid ramp-up and process automation. Overall, regional strategies must balance technical requirements, regulatory compliance, and logistics considerations to ensure consistent adhesive performance across diverse vehicle programs.
Understand how supplier differentiation is shifting toward integrated materials application services resilient regional footprints and targeted innovations in battery and thermal adhesive solutions
Supplier strategies and competitive positioning are increasingly defined by the ability to couple advanced materials with application engineering and service continuity. Leading adhesive producers have invested in specialized product lines for battery adhesion, thermally conductive gap fillers, and conductive EMI solutions, while differentiating through application-support services such as automated dispensing integration, in-line metrology recommendations, and on-site process qualification. Larger incumbents leverage broad formulation portfolios to serve both OEM development cycles and aftermarket product lines, enabling cross-program knowledge transfer and scale advantages in raw-material sourcing.
Smaller, specialized firms differentiate through rapid innovation cycles and niche focus, for example concentrating on phase change materials or highly conductive adhesives tailored to compact battery modules. These suppliers often partner with system integrators and testing labs to accelerate qualification, offering tailored aging and vibration protocols. Meanwhile, contract manufacturers and tier-one adhesive formulators emphasize regional capacity and logistical reliability to support zero-defect production ramps. Across the landscape, strategic partnerships between material scientists, equipment OEMs, and vehicle manufacturers accelerate adoption by aligning chemistry performance with dispensing technology and process controls.
As a result, commercial success stems from an integrated value proposition: proven product performance combined with demonstrable application expertise and a resilient supply footprint that reduces qualification friction for vehicle programs.
Adopt a prioritized set of actions to integrate adhesive selection into early design automation qualification and supplier diversification to reduce risk and accelerate production ramps
Industry leaders should take a sequence of targeted actions to capture immediate productivity gains while safeguarding against supply and regulatory risk. First, embed adhesive selection early in the vehicle architecture and design-for-manufacturing discussions so that chemistry, cure profiles, and dispensing constraints become design inputs rather than late-stage fixes. Early alignment reduces rework and shortens validation cycles, enabling smoother production ramps.
Second, prioritize process automation where repeatability and cycle time materially affect cost and quality; invest in proof-of-concept lines to validate automated dispensing, cure controls, and in-line inspection. Third, diversify supplier pools by qualifying at least one geographically proximate alternative supplier and validating cross-compatible chemistries to reduce exposure to trade or logistics shocks. Fourth, incorporate end-of-life and recyclability criteria into adhesive specification to meet tightening regulatory expectations and to lower downstream dismantling costs. Finally, develop collaborative test protocols with suppliers that simulate real-world thermal cycling, vibration, and chemical exposure to ensure adhesives meet long-term durability targets. By following these actions in parallel, leaders will improve time-to-production, reduce integration risk, and create a defensible advantage in both OEM programs and aftermarket service offerings.
Review the structured research approach combining primary interviews materials characterization site observations and scenario-based risk analysis to deliver actionable technical insights
The research underpinning this executive summary combines qualitative interviews, materials characterization review, and applied process observation to ensure findings are actionable and technically grounded. Primary information was gathered through structured interviews with materials scientists, assembly engineers, procurement leads, and tier-one adhesive suppliers, focusing on performance trade-offs, qualification timelines, and supply-chain constraints. Secondary technical sources included peer-reviewed materials science literature, publicly available regulatory documents, and manufacturer technical datasheets to cross-validate performance attributes and application constraints.
In addition, the methodology incorporated a comparative analysis of application methods and production workflows through site visits and virtual process reviews, enabling assessment of automation readiness and dispensing compatibility across representative assembly environments. Risk analysis considered supplier footprint, logistics complexity, and regulatory compliance obligations, while scenario-based sensitivity checks evaluated the operational impact of alternative sourcing and chemistry substitution. Throughout the process, emphasis remained on practical relevance: test protocols and selection criteria were framed to be adoptable by engineering and procurement teams during vehicle development and production ramp phases.
Conclude with a concise synthesis showing how strategic adhesive management unlocks design performance production resilience and regulatory alignment for electric vehicle programs
Adhesives are now central to the performance, safety, and manufacturability of electric vehicles, and their strategic management can materially influence program outcomes. Across chemistry innovation, application automation, and supplier strategy, clear opportunities exist to reduce integration friction, enhance thermal and electrical performance, and improve production resilience. At the same time, evolving regulatory priorities and trade dynamics demand proactive attention to supply-chain design and material compliance.
Moving forward, companies that integrate adhesive selection into early-stage design, invest in automation where it drives repeatability, and develop supplier contingency plans will reduce validation timelines and exposure to disruption. Furthermore, adopting sustainability and end-of-life considerations within adhesive specifications will position organizations to meet regulatory expectations and evolving consumer preferences. In short, treating adhesives as strategic engineering elements rather than ancillary materials unlocks both product and operational advantages that translate into safer, more efficient, and more competitive electric vehicle programs.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
193 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Development of lightweight structural adhesives for bonding aluminum and carbon composite EV chassis panels
- 5.2. Growing adoption of thermally conductive adhesives tailored for advanced EV battery module heat dissipation
- 5.3. Increasing demand for ecofriendly bio-based adhesive formulations to reduce EV manufacturing carbon footprint
- 5.4. Emergence of electrically conductive adhesives for seamless integration of EV battery cells and power electronics
- 5.5. Advancement of UV-curable adhesive solutions for high-speed automated assembly of EV interior components
- 5.6. Development of silicone-based high-voltage insulation adhesives for robust EV powertrain safety and performance
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Adhesive Type
- 8.1. Acrylic Adhesive
- 8.2. Epoxy Adhesive
- 8.3. Polyurethane Adhesive
- 8.4. Silicone Adhesive
- 9. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Application Method
- 9.1. Automated Dispensing
- 9.2. Manual Dispensing
- 10. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Vehicle Type
- 10.1. Battery Electric Vehicles
- 10.2. Hybrid Electric Vehicles
- 10.3. Plug In Hybrid Electric Vehicles
- 11. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Application
- 11.1. Battery Pack Assembly
- 11.2. EMI Shielding
- 11.2.1. Conductive Adhesives
- 11.2.2. Epoxy Based EMI Adhesives
- 11.3. Sealing And Gasketing
- 11.4. Structural Bonding
- 11.5. Thermal Management
- 11.5.1. Phase Change Materials
- 11.5.2. Thermal Gap Fillers
- 12. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by End User
- 12.1. Aftermarket
- 12.2. Oem
- 13. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. 3M Company
- 16.3.2. Arkema SA
- 16.3.3. Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
- 16.3.4. Avery Dennison Corporation
- 16.3.5. Bostik S.A.
- 16.3.6. Dow Inc.
- 16.3.7. Dymax Corporation
- 16.3.8. H.B. Fuller Company
- 16.3.9. Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
- 16.3.10. Huntsman Corporation
- 16.3.11. Illinois Tool Works Inc.
- 16.3.12. Jowat SE
- 16.3.13. L&L Products, Inc.
- 16.3.14. Nitto Denko Corporation
- 16.3.15. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
- 16.3.16. Permabond LLC
- 16.3.17. PPG Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.18. Sika AG
- 16.3.19. Uniseal, Inc.
- 16.3.20. Wacker Chemie AG
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
