Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market by Adhesive Type (Acrylic Adhesive, Epoxy Adhesive, Polyurethane Adhesive), Application Method (Automated Dispensing, Manual Dispensing), Application, Vehicle Type, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market was valued at USD 941.93 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1,234.30 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 30.37%, reaching USD 7,864.18 million by 2032.
Framing the strategic importance of advanced adhesives as mission-critical materials that influence battery integrity, thermal management, EMI control, and manufacturing scalability
The transition to electrified mobility has elevated adhesives from a peripheral consumable to a core enabler of vehicle performance, safety, and manufacturability. As battery systems, structural assemblies, thermal subsystems, and electromagnetic shielding requirements converge, adhesive technologies are being redefined by a combination of material science advances, automated production imperatives, and increasingly stringent regulatory and reliability expectations. In turn, adhesive selection now influences energy density, crashworthiness, thermal control, and manufacturability in ways that were historically distributed across multiple component-level decisions.
This report opens with a strategic framing that situates adhesive technology within the broader vehicle electrification agenda. It synthesizes the forces that are reshaping formulation priorities, including thermal conductivity needs for fast-charging batteries, electrically conductive chemistries for EMI control, and high-modulus structural adhesives that replace mechanical fasteners to lower mass. The introduction also highlights the interplay between process automation and material performance, noting that the adoption of automated dispensing shifts qualification timelines, tolerances, and supplier collaboration models. Finally, the section underscores how cross-functional engagement between procurement, component engineering, and quality teams becomes imperative to minimize rework, accelerate vehicle-level validation, and protect program timelines as adhesive choices increasingly affect system-level outcomes.
Analyzing the converging technological, manufacturing, and regulatory forces that are redefining adhesive selection, process integration, and supplier collaboration across electrified vehicle programs
The landscape for electric vehicle adhesives is undergoing transformative shifts driven by a combination of technological innovation, manufacturing modernization, and evolving regulatory pressures. Novel chemistries are emerging to address the twin imperatives of thermal performance and electrical conductivity, with R&D investments prioritizing formulations that provide reliable thermal gap filling while meeting long-term creep and outgassing requirements. At the same time, lightweighting goals and the desire to replace mechanical joining with structural bonding are elevating high-modulus adhesives into primary structural roles, expanding material qualification regimes and crash simulation requirements.
Manufacturing shifts are equally consequential. Wider adoption of automated dispensing and in-line inspection capabilities is increasing the throughput and consistency of adhesive application, while also imposing new compatibility constraints on rheology and cure profiles. These process-driven demands are prompting closer collaboration between adhesive suppliers and OEMs to co-develop application-specific solutions and to shorten pilot-to-production cycles. Concurrently, heightened focus on durability and recyclability is steering formulators toward lower-emissions chemistries and more repairable joint designs. Collectively, these drivers are reshaping supplier relationships, accelerating vertical integration in some supply chains, and requiring procurement and engineering teams to adopt more integrated qualification and validation practices to maintain pace with vehicle electrification roadmaps.
Evaluating how recent United States trade measures are reshaping sourcing strategies, production footprint decisions, and supplier qualification approaches for adhesive supply chains
The introduction of targeted tariffs and trade measures in the United States has created a complex set of cost, sourcing, and strategic implications for adhesive suppliers and OEMs that participate in global automotive value chains. Supply base decisions are increasingly influenced by tariff exposure, with manufacturers evaluating near-shore sourcing, dual sourcing, and strategic inventory positioning to mitigate the operational risk of sudden duty changes. As a result, procurement strategies are moving beyond unit price to consider landed cost variability, lead-time resilience, and supplier diversification as core drivers of sourcing decisions.
Tariff-driven dynamics also affect formulation choices and localization incentives. Suppliers with global production footprints are reassessing which facilities contract-manufacture specialty adhesives and which product lines justify localized production near major vehicle assembly clusters. In parallel, OEMs and tier suppliers are accelerating qualification of regionally produced adhesives to reduce dependency on long supply corridors that are vulnerable to tariff shifts. These adjustments carry implications for R&D deployment and capital allocation as companies determine where to site production for conductive adhesives, epoxy-based EMI solutions, and thermally conductive gap fillers to balance cost certainty with technical validation timelines. Ultimately, the tariff environment is prompting a more proactive, scenario-based approach to sourcing decisions that integrates regulatory foresight with engineering qualification and inventory strategy.
Uncovering nuanced segmentation-driven priorities across adhesive chemistries, application methods, functional uses, vehicle classes, and end-user channels that determine product and process strategies
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated priorities that map directly to material performance requirements, application environments, and production methods. Based on Adhesive Type, Acrylic Adhesive, Epoxy Adhesive, Polyurethane Adhesive, and Silicone Adhesive each present distinct trade-offs between flexibility, modulus, thermal conductivity, and environmental resistance, so material selection must align to both short-term assembly needs and long-term durability expectations. Based on Application Method, Automated Dispensing and Manual Dispensing create divergent constraints for formulation rheology, cure kinetics, and fixture times, with automated lines favoring low-variance, high-throughput chemistries and manual operations allowing for more viscous or thixotropic systems.
Based on Application, Battery Pack Assembly, EMI Shielding, Sealing And Gasketing, Structural Bonding, and Thermal Management each demand bespoke material attributes and qualification protocols. Within EMI Shielding, Conductive Adhesives and Epoxy Based EMI Adhesives address the need for electrical continuity and mechanical integrity, whereas Thermal Management subdivides into Phase Change Materials and Thermal Gap Fillers to meet competing objectives of transient heat absorption and consistent thermal coupling. Based on Vehicle Type, Battery Electric Vehicles, Hybrid Electric Vehicles, and Plug In Hybrid Electric Vehicles impose different packaging, thermal load, and vibration profiles that influence adhesive formulation and application strategy. Based on End User, Aftermarket and Oem channels diverge in qualification rigor, volume expectations, and distribution models, requiring suppliers to adopt differentiated go-to-market and support frameworks to serve both markets effectively.
Explaining how distinctive regional manufacturing clusters, regulatory priorities, and supplier ecosystems drive differentiated adoption and commercialization pathways for adhesives globally
Regional dynamics exert powerful influence on regulatory expectations, supplier ecosystems, and adoption timelines for advanced adhesive technologies. In the Americas, growth in battery-electric vehicle programs is concentrated around both established OEM hubs and emerging EV-focused startups, driving demand for adhesives suited to high-throughput battery pack assembly and robust thermal management under a range of climate conditions. This region also emphasizes supplier proximity and logistic resilience as critical considerations for cost and program certainty.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigor on vehicle safety, emissions, and recyclability propels advanced adhesive adoption in structural bonding and lightweighting initiatives, while established automotive clusters support deep technical collaboration between formulators and OEMs. The region’s emphasis on circularity and repairability informs material selection and end-of-life considerations. In Asia-Pacific, the combination of large-scale vehicle production, rapid electrification adoption, and dense supplier networks facilitates faster pilot-to-production cycles for novel adhesive chemistries, particularly in thermal management and EMI shielding. Across these geographies, regional policy, local supplier capability, and manufacturing density collectively shape the pace and nature of adhesive adoption, and therefore require tailored commercialization and qualification strategies for suppliers and OEMs alike.
Profiling how technical depth, application engineering services, and localized manufacturing capabilities distinguish leading adhesive suppliers in a rapidly evolving EV supply chain
Competitive dynamics among key companies are characterized by a blend of formulation expertise, application engineering capability, and manufacturing scale. Leading material developers are investing in cross-functional teams that combine chemists, application engineers, and process integration specialists to reduce time-to-qualification and to co-develop solutions that align with OEM process parameters and quality gates. These capabilities are complemented by strategic partnerships with dispensing equipment providers and by the expansion of local production footprints to support faster customer response and reduced logistic exposure.
At the same time, differentiation is increasingly achieved through value-added services such as application training, in-line process optimization, and joint qualification programs. Firms that can demonstrate robust reliability data, compatibility with automated dispensing platforms, and proven thermal or conductive performance gain preferential consideration during supplier selection. Moreover, a subset of companies is pursuing modular product architectures that allow formulators to adapt base chemistries to specific thermal, mechanical, or electrical needs without restarting full qualification cycles. This combination of technical depth, application support, and manufacturing agility defines the competitive frontier and shapes how OEMs and tier suppliers prioritize strategic partners.
Actionable steps for OEMs and suppliers to shorten qualification cycles, strengthen sourcing resilience, and align adhesives to automated production and performance imperatives
Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic actions to translate insight into operational advantage. First, cross-functional qualification teams that include procurement, materials engineering, and manufacturing process owners should be established to accelerate joint testing and reduce iterative rework between component and system-level validation. Second, suppliers and OEMs should jointly pilot automated dispensing parameters early in development to ensure formulations meet both performance and process compatibility constraints, thereby shortening pilot-to-production cycles.
Third, build near-term sourcing scenarios that factor in tariff volatility and supplier localization options, and use these scenarios to drive investment decisions in regional production or inventory buffers. Fourth, prioritize modular formulation strategies that retain core performance attributes while allowing rapid customization for thermal gap fillers, phase change units, and conductive EMI solutions. Finally, invest in capability-building programs such as on-site application training and co-located technical support to improve first-pass yield, reduce qualification time, and create stronger supplier-customer integration that supports long-term program stability. These actions collectively reduce program risk, protect development timelines, and enhance the probability of first-time-right qualification outcomes.
Describing the rigorous mixed-methods research approach that integrates expert interviews, technical validation, and scenario planning to produce decision-ready insights for adhesive adoption
This research combines primary interviews with materials scientists, application engineers, procurement leaders, and manufacturing specialists together with secondary analysis of technical literature, standards documents, and regulatory guidance to build a holistic view of adhesive use cases and constraints. The methodology emphasizes triangulation: qualitative insights from subject-matter experts are cross-validated against application case studies and technical performance data to ensure recommendations are grounded in real-world practice. Attention was given to the reproducibility of application parameters such as dispense geometry, cure profile, and environmental exposure to ensure findings are relevant to production environments.
Segmentation-driven analysis was performed to align technical priorities with application contexts, covering adhesive chemistries, dispensing methods, and functional applications including battery pack assembly, EMI shielding, sealing and gasketing, structural bonding, and thermal management. Where applicable, further granularity was applied to EMI shielding chemistries and thermal management strategies. Regional dynamics were evaluated through a combination of on-the-ground supply chain assessments and policy reviews to capture the implications of regulatory and trade developments. Finally, recommendations were stress-tested via scenario planning to assess resilience under supply chain disruption and tariff variability, ensuring that strategic guidance is actionable for decision-makers.
Concluding observations that synthesize how material innovation, process integration, and strategic sourcing combine to determine adhesive success in electrified vehicle architectures
In summary, adhesives are now central to the technical and commercial success of electric vehicle programs because they bridge material science, process engineering, and supply chain strategy. As vehicles continue to electrify, adhesive requirements will become more exacting: thermal management solutions must reconcile short-term heat dissipation with long-term dimensional stability, conductive adhesives must deliver repeatable EMC performance under vibration and thermal cycling, and structural bonding systems must satisfy both crashworthiness and lightweighting goals. These converging demands require suppliers and OEMs to work more closely, integrating chemistry innovation with application engineering and production process design.
Looking ahead, the combination of tariff-driven sourcing choices, regional production strategies, and manufacturing automation will determine which suppliers attain scale and trust with OEMs. Companies that invest in modular chemistries, localized production, and comprehensive application support will be best positioned to capture long-term program roles. Ultimately, a cross-disciplinary approach that aligns procurement, engineering, and manufacturing around clear qualification pathways will be the defining capability for teams seeking to de-risk adhesive adoption and to accelerate time-to-production with confidence.
Market Segmentation & Coverage
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-segmentations:
Adhesive Type
Acrylic Adhesive
Epoxy Adhesive
Polyurethane Adhesive
Silicone Adhesive
Application Method
Automated Dispensing
Manual Dispensing
Application
Battery Pack Assembly
EMI Shielding
Conductive Adhesives
Epoxy Based EMI Adhesives
Sealing And Gasketing
Structural Bonding
Thermal Management
Phase Change Materials
Thermal Gap Fillers
Vehicle Type
Battery Electric Vehicles
Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Plug In Hybrid Electric Vehicles
End User
Aftermarket
Oem
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-regions:
Americas
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Latin America
Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Colombia
Peru
Europe, Middle East & Africa
Europe
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
Italy
Spain
Netherlands
Sweden
Poland
Switzerland
Middle East
United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Turkey
Israel
Africa
South Africa
Nigeria
Egypt
Kenya
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
Australia
South Korea
Indonesia
Thailand
Malaysia
Singapore
Taiwan
This research report categorizes to delves into recent significant developments and analyze trends in each of the following companies:
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
3M Company
Sika AG
H.B. Fuller Company
Dow Inc.
Arkema SA
Huntsman Corporation
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
Nitto Denko Corporation
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the strategic importance of advanced adhesives as mission-critical materials that influence battery integrity, thermal management, EMI control, and manufacturing scalability
The transition to electrified mobility has elevated adhesives from a peripheral consumable to a core enabler of vehicle performance, safety, and manufacturability. As battery systems, structural assemblies, thermal subsystems, and electromagnetic shielding requirements converge, adhesive technologies are being redefined by a combination of material science advances, automated production imperatives, and increasingly stringent regulatory and reliability expectations. In turn, adhesive selection now influences energy density, crashworthiness, thermal control, and manufacturability in ways that were historically distributed across multiple component-level decisions.
This report opens with a strategic framing that situates adhesive technology within the broader vehicle electrification agenda. It synthesizes the forces that are reshaping formulation priorities, including thermal conductivity needs for fast-charging batteries, electrically conductive chemistries for EMI control, and high-modulus structural adhesives that replace mechanical fasteners to lower mass. The introduction also highlights the interplay between process automation and material performance, noting that the adoption of automated dispensing shifts qualification timelines, tolerances, and supplier collaboration models. Finally, the section underscores how cross-functional engagement between procurement, component engineering, and quality teams becomes imperative to minimize rework, accelerate vehicle-level validation, and protect program timelines as adhesive choices increasingly affect system-level outcomes.
Analyzing the converging technological, manufacturing, and regulatory forces that are redefining adhesive selection, process integration, and supplier collaboration across electrified vehicle programs
The landscape for electric vehicle adhesives is undergoing transformative shifts driven by a combination of technological innovation, manufacturing modernization, and evolving regulatory pressures. Novel chemistries are emerging to address the twin imperatives of thermal performance and electrical conductivity, with R&D investments prioritizing formulations that provide reliable thermal gap filling while meeting long-term creep and outgassing requirements. At the same time, lightweighting goals and the desire to replace mechanical joining with structural bonding are elevating high-modulus adhesives into primary structural roles, expanding material qualification regimes and crash simulation requirements.
Manufacturing shifts are equally consequential. Wider adoption of automated dispensing and in-line inspection capabilities is increasing the throughput and consistency of adhesive application, while also imposing new compatibility constraints on rheology and cure profiles. These process-driven demands are prompting closer collaboration between adhesive suppliers and OEMs to co-develop application-specific solutions and to shorten pilot-to-production cycles. Concurrently, heightened focus on durability and recyclability is steering formulators toward lower-emissions chemistries and more repairable joint designs. Collectively, these drivers are reshaping supplier relationships, accelerating vertical integration in some supply chains, and requiring procurement and engineering teams to adopt more integrated qualification and validation practices to maintain pace with vehicle electrification roadmaps.
Evaluating how recent United States trade measures are reshaping sourcing strategies, production footprint decisions, and supplier qualification approaches for adhesive supply chains
The introduction of targeted tariffs and trade measures in the United States has created a complex set of cost, sourcing, and strategic implications for adhesive suppliers and OEMs that participate in global automotive value chains. Supply base decisions are increasingly influenced by tariff exposure, with manufacturers evaluating near-shore sourcing, dual sourcing, and strategic inventory positioning to mitigate the operational risk of sudden duty changes. As a result, procurement strategies are moving beyond unit price to consider landed cost variability, lead-time resilience, and supplier diversification as core drivers of sourcing decisions.
Tariff-driven dynamics also affect formulation choices and localization incentives. Suppliers with global production footprints are reassessing which facilities contract-manufacture specialty adhesives and which product lines justify localized production near major vehicle assembly clusters. In parallel, OEMs and tier suppliers are accelerating qualification of regionally produced adhesives to reduce dependency on long supply corridors that are vulnerable to tariff shifts. These adjustments carry implications for R&D deployment and capital allocation as companies determine where to site production for conductive adhesives, epoxy-based EMI solutions, and thermally conductive gap fillers to balance cost certainty with technical validation timelines. Ultimately, the tariff environment is prompting a more proactive, scenario-based approach to sourcing decisions that integrates regulatory foresight with engineering qualification and inventory strategy.
Uncovering nuanced segmentation-driven priorities across adhesive chemistries, application methods, functional uses, vehicle classes, and end-user channels that determine product and process strategies
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated priorities that map directly to material performance requirements, application environments, and production methods. Based on Adhesive Type, Acrylic Adhesive, Epoxy Adhesive, Polyurethane Adhesive, and Silicone Adhesive each present distinct trade-offs between flexibility, modulus, thermal conductivity, and environmental resistance, so material selection must align to both short-term assembly needs and long-term durability expectations. Based on Application Method, Automated Dispensing and Manual Dispensing create divergent constraints for formulation rheology, cure kinetics, and fixture times, with automated lines favoring low-variance, high-throughput chemistries and manual operations allowing for more viscous or thixotropic systems.
Based on Application, Battery Pack Assembly, EMI Shielding, Sealing And Gasketing, Structural Bonding, and Thermal Management each demand bespoke material attributes and qualification protocols. Within EMI Shielding, Conductive Adhesives and Epoxy Based EMI Adhesives address the need for electrical continuity and mechanical integrity, whereas Thermal Management subdivides into Phase Change Materials and Thermal Gap Fillers to meet competing objectives of transient heat absorption and consistent thermal coupling. Based on Vehicle Type, Battery Electric Vehicles, Hybrid Electric Vehicles, and Plug In Hybrid Electric Vehicles impose different packaging, thermal load, and vibration profiles that influence adhesive formulation and application strategy. Based on End User, Aftermarket and Oem channels diverge in qualification rigor, volume expectations, and distribution models, requiring suppliers to adopt differentiated go-to-market and support frameworks to serve both markets effectively.
Explaining how distinctive regional manufacturing clusters, regulatory priorities, and supplier ecosystems drive differentiated adoption and commercialization pathways for adhesives globally
Regional dynamics exert powerful influence on regulatory expectations, supplier ecosystems, and adoption timelines for advanced adhesive technologies. In the Americas, growth in battery-electric vehicle programs is concentrated around both established OEM hubs and emerging EV-focused startups, driving demand for adhesives suited to high-throughput battery pack assembly and robust thermal management under a range of climate conditions. This region also emphasizes supplier proximity and logistic resilience as critical considerations for cost and program certainty.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigor on vehicle safety, emissions, and recyclability propels advanced adhesive adoption in structural bonding and lightweighting initiatives, while established automotive clusters support deep technical collaboration between formulators and OEMs. The region’s emphasis on circularity and repairability informs material selection and end-of-life considerations. In Asia-Pacific, the combination of large-scale vehicle production, rapid electrification adoption, and dense supplier networks facilitates faster pilot-to-production cycles for novel adhesive chemistries, particularly in thermal management and EMI shielding. Across these geographies, regional policy, local supplier capability, and manufacturing density collectively shape the pace and nature of adhesive adoption, and therefore require tailored commercialization and qualification strategies for suppliers and OEMs alike.
Profiling how technical depth, application engineering services, and localized manufacturing capabilities distinguish leading adhesive suppliers in a rapidly evolving EV supply chain
Competitive dynamics among key companies are characterized by a blend of formulation expertise, application engineering capability, and manufacturing scale. Leading material developers are investing in cross-functional teams that combine chemists, application engineers, and process integration specialists to reduce time-to-qualification and to co-develop solutions that align with OEM process parameters and quality gates. These capabilities are complemented by strategic partnerships with dispensing equipment providers and by the expansion of local production footprints to support faster customer response and reduced logistic exposure.
At the same time, differentiation is increasingly achieved through value-added services such as application training, in-line process optimization, and joint qualification programs. Firms that can demonstrate robust reliability data, compatibility with automated dispensing platforms, and proven thermal or conductive performance gain preferential consideration during supplier selection. Moreover, a subset of companies is pursuing modular product architectures that allow formulators to adapt base chemistries to specific thermal, mechanical, or electrical needs without restarting full qualification cycles. This combination of technical depth, application support, and manufacturing agility defines the competitive frontier and shapes how OEMs and tier suppliers prioritize strategic partners.
Actionable steps for OEMs and suppliers to shorten qualification cycles, strengthen sourcing resilience, and align adhesives to automated production and performance imperatives
Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic actions to translate insight into operational advantage. First, cross-functional qualification teams that include procurement, materials engineering, and manufacturing process owners should be established to accelerate joint testing and reduce iterative rework between component and system-level validation. Second, suppliers and OEMs should jointly pilot automated dispensing parameters early in development to ensure formulations meet both performance and process compatibility constraints, thereby shortening pilot-to-production cycles.
Third, build near-term sourcing scenarios that factor in tariff volatility and supplier localization options, and use these scenarios to drive investment decisions in regional production or inventory buffers. Fourth, prioritize modular formulation strategies that retain core performance attributes while allowing rapid customization for thermal gap fillers, phase change units, and conductive EMI solutions. Finally, invest in capability-building programs such as on-site application training and co-located technical support to improve first-pass yield, reduce qualification time, and create stronger supplier-customer integration that supports long-term program stability. These actions collectively reduce program risk, protect development timelines, and enhance the probability of first-time-right qualification outcomes.
Describing the rigorous mixed-methods research approach that integrates expert interviews, technical validation, and scenario planning to produce decision-ready insights for adhesive adoption
This research combines primary interviews with materials scientists, application engineers, procurement leaders, and manufacturing specialists together with secondary analysis of technical literature, standards documents, and regulatory guidance to build a holistic view of adhesive use cases and constraints. The methodology emphasizes triangulation: qualitative insights from subject-matter experts are cross-validated against application case studies and technical performance data to ensure recommendations are grounded in real-world practice. Attention was given to the reproducibility of application parameters such as dispense geometry, cure profile, and environmental exposure to ensure findings are relevant to production environments.
Segmentation-driven analysis was performed to align technical priorities with application contexts, covering adhesive chemistries, dispensing methods, and functional applications including battery pack assembly, EMI shielding, sealing and gasketing, structural bonding, and thermal management. Where applicable, further granularity was applied to EMI shielding chemistries and thermal management strategies. Regional dynamics were evaluated through a combination of on-the-ground supply chain assessments and policy reviews to capture the implications of regulatory and trade developments. Finally, recommendations were stress-tested via scenario planning to assess resilience under supply chain disruption and tariff variability, ensuring that strategic guidance is actionable for decision-makers.
Concluding observations that synthesize how material innovation, process integration, and strategic sourcing combine to determine adhesive success in electrified vehicle architectures
In summary, adhesives are now central to the technical and commercial success of electric vehicle programs because they bridge material science, process engineering, and supply chain strategy. As vehicles continue to electrify, adhesive requirements will become more exacting: thermal management solutions must reconcile short-term heat dissipation with long-term dimensional stability, conductive adhesives must deliver repeatable EMC performance under vibration and thermal cycling, and structural bonding systems must satisfy both crashworthiness and lightweighting goals. These converging demands require suppliers and OEMs to work more closely, integrating chemistry innovation with application engineering and production process design.
Looking ahead, the combination of tariff-driven sourcing choices, regional production strategies, and manufacturing automation will determine which suppliers attain scale and trust with OEMs. Companies that invest in modular chemistries, localized production, and comprehensive application support will be best positioned to capture long-term program roles. Ultimately, a cross-disciplinary approach that aligns procurement, engineering, and manufacturing around clear qualification pathways will be the defining capability for teams seeking to de-risk adhesive adoption and to accelerate time-to-production with confidence.
Market Segmentation & Coverage
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-segmentations:
Adhesive Type
Acrylic Adhesive
Epoxy Adhesive
Polyurethane Adhesive
Silicone Adhesive
Application Method
Automated Dispensing
Manual Dispensing
Application
Battery Pack Assembly
EMI Shielding
Conductive Adhesives
Epoxy Based EMI Adhesives
Sealing And Gasketing
Structural Bonding
Thermal Management
Phase Change Materials
Thermal Gap Fillers
Vehicle Type
Battery Electric Vehicles
Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Plug In Hybrid Electric Vehicles
End User
Aftermarket
Oem
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-regions:
Americas
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Latin America
Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Colombia
Peru
Europe, Middle East & Africa
Europe
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
Italy
Spain
Netherlands
Sweden
Poland
Switzerland
Middle East
United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Turkey
Israel
Africa
South Africa
Nigeria
Egypt
Kenya
Asia-Pacific
China
India
Japan
Australia
South Korea
Indonesia
Thailand
Malaysia
Singapore
Taiwan
This research report categorizes to delves into recent significant developments and analyze trends in each of the following companies:
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
3M Company
Sika AG
H.B. Fuller Company
Dow Inc.
Arkema SA
Huntsman Corporation
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
Nitto Denko Corporation
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
188 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency & Pricing
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Development of lightweight structural adhesives for bonding aluminum and carbon composite EV chassis panels
- 5.2. Growing adoption of thermally conductive adhesives tailored for advanced EV battery module heat dissipation
- 5.3. Increasing demand for ecofriendly bio-based adhesive formulations to reduce EV manufacturing carbon footprint
- 5.4. Emergence of electrically conductive adhesives for seamless integration of EV battery cells and power electronics
- 5.5. Advancement of UV-curable adhesive solutions for high-speed automated assembly of EV interior components
- 5.6. Development of silicone-based high-voltage insulation adhesives for robust EV powertrain safety and performance
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Adhesive Type
- 8.1. Acrylic Adhesive
- 8.2. Epoxy Adhesive
- 8.3. Polyurethane Adhesive
- 8.4. Silicone Adhesive
- 9. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Application Method
- 9.1. Automated Dispensing
- 9.2. Manual Dispensing
- 10. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Application
- 10.1. Battery Pack Assembly
- 10.2. EMI Shielding
- 10.2.1. Conductive Adhesives
- 10.2.2. Epoxy Based EMI Adhesives
- 10.3. Sealing And Gasketing
- 10.4. Structural Bonding
- 10.5. Thermal Management
- 10.5.1. Phase Change Materials
- 10.5.2. Thermal Gap Fillers
- 11. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Vehicle Type
- 11.1. Battery Electric Vehicles
- 11.2. Hybrid Electric Vehicles
- 11.3. Plug In Hybrid Electric Vehicles
- 12. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by End User
- 12.1. Aftermarket
- 12.2. Oem
- 13. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Electric Vehicle Adhesives Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
- 16.3.2. 3M Company
- 16.3.3. Sika AG
- 16.3.4. H.B. Fuller Company
- 16.3.5. Dow Inc.
- 16.3.6. Arkema SA
- 16.3.7. Huntsman Corporation
- 16.3.8. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
- 16.3.9. Illinois Tool Works Inc.
- 16.3.10. Nitto Denko Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
