Electric Traction Motor Market by Vehicle Type (Commercial Vehicles, Passenger Cars, Two Wheelers), Motor Type (Induction Motor, Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor, Switched Reluctance Motor), Power Rating, Voltage Level, Construction Type, Cooling Type -
Description
The Electric Traction Motor Market was valued at USD 19.19 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 20.09 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.36%, reaching USD 39.28 billion by 2032.
A clear and authoritative framing of the electric traction motor ecosystem highlighting technological drivers, supply chain alignment, and product strategy imperatives
The electric traction motor domain stands at the intersection of accelerated electrification objectives, supply chain realignment, and rapid advances in motor architectures and materials science. This introduction frames the ecosystem by outlining the pivotal technological drivers such as higher voltage architectures, cooling innovations, and emerging motor topologies that are reshaping vehicle electrification pathways. It also situates the role of vehicle OEMs, Tier‑1 suppliers, and advanced material manufacturers in choreographing product roadmaps that respond to performance, efficiency, cost, and sustainability demands.
As electrified transport expands across passenger cars, two wheelers, and commercial vehicle segments including buses and heavy duty platforms, the traction motor becomes both a performance differentiator and a strategic procurement focal point. The narrative connects recent engineering advances to practical deployment considerations, including thermal management trade-offs, packaging constraints for in‑wheel versus central mounted designs, and compatibility with evolving voltage tiers. Finally, the introduction underscores the importance of cross-functional alignment-between product engineering, supply chain, and policy teams-to translate technical options into commercially viable and resilient product strategies in the near term.
How rapid technological innovation, system integration, supply chain realignment, and sustainability expectations are collectively redefining electric traction motor strategies
The landscape for electric traction motors is undergoing several transformative shifts driven by technological maturation, regulatory pressures, and evolving customer expectations. First, the transition to higher voltage platforms is enabling greater power density and faster charging possibilities, which in turn incentivizes rethinking insulation, cooling approaches, and power electronics integration. Concurrently, advances in motor topologies-ranging from refined permanent magnet synchronous solutions to robust switched reluctance platforms-are altering the trade space between efficiency, rare earth dependency, and manufacturability.
Second, system-level integration is gaining prominence: motors are no longer standalone components but critical nodes in vehicle electrification architectures that must harmonize with inverters, thermal systems, and vehicle control algorithms. This trend elevates the strategic importance of modular designs that ease integration across different vehicle types. Third, the supply chain is shifting toward localized and resilient sourcing patterns, influenced by trade policies and material geopolitics, prompting manufacturers to diversify supplier bases and explore alternatives to rare earth magnets. Finally, customer expectations around range, reliability, and lifecycle sustainability are forcing continuous refinement of testing protocols, durability benchmarks, and end-of-life strategies, reinforcing a product development cycle that is both faster and more collaborative across disciplines.
How recent tariff measures catalyze supply chain restructuring, design choices, and regional sourcing strategies that drive lasting industrial realignment in electric traction motor procurement
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures can materially reshape supplier selection, cost structures, and strategic sourcing decisions for electric traction motor stakeholders. In response to tariff signals, procurement teams often prioritize supplier diversification and nearshoring to mitigate exposure to cross‑border price volatility and lead‑time uncertainty. This adjustment typically prompts a reassessment of vertically integrated versus outsourced production models, influencing decisions around magnet procurement, stator and rotor manufacturing, and assembly footprints.
Manufacturers react to tariff-driven cost differentials by exploring design optimizations that reduce dependency on tariff‑sensitive components, such as substituting magnet chemistries, increasing the use of wound rotor synchronous architectures where appropriate, or investing in production technologies that lower labor and processing costs. At the same time, strategic players accelerate supplier qualification protocols and deepen partnerships with regional suppliers to preserve performance targets while safeguarding margins. Regulatory shifts also redirect investment flows toward technologies that are less exposed to trade friction, reinforcing resilience through dual sourcing, contractual hedging, and targeted capital expenditure in local production capacity. These combined actions underscore how tariffs act as catalysts for structural supply chain change rather than isolated price shocks.
Practical segmentation intelligence tying vehicle architectures, motor topologies, power band distinctions, cooling strategies, construction formats, and voltage tiers to engineering and commercial choices
Segmentation-driven product and commercial strategies reveal distinct pathways across vehicle architectures, motor technologies, power classes, cooling approaches, construction choices, and voltage domains. When considering vehicle type, manufacturers must address divergent performance and packaging needs across passenger cars, two wheelers, and commercial vehicles, with commercial vehicle considerations extending to buses, heavy commercial vehicles, and light commercial vehicles where torque, endurance, and thermal robustness become preeminent design drivers. Motor type selection spans induction motors, permanent magnet synchronous motors, switched reluctance motors, and wound rotor synchronous motors; within permanent magnet synchronous platforms, the choice between ferrite and rare earth magnet chemistries informs both cost and magnetic performance, while wound rotor synchronous designs offer options between brushless excited and excited wound rotor implementations for specific control and efficiency outcomes.
Power rating segmentation frames distinct engineering priorities across high power classes above 300 kW, medium ranges between 75 and 300 kW, and low power envelopes below 75 kW; high power applications further differentiate between 300–500 kW and greater than 500 kW tiers, while medium power distinctions between 150–300 kW and 75–150 kW guide thermal management and cooling selection. Cooling type decisions between air‑cooled and liquid‑cooled systems impact packaging, weight, and sustained output under duty cycles. Construction choices between central mounted and in‑wheel architectures influence vehicle dynamics and integration complexity, with in‑wheel options subdividing into hub motor and ring motor approaches that carry different unsprung mass and packaging implications. Finally, voltage level segmentation across low voltage below 400 V, medium voltage between 400–800 V, and high voltage above 800 V defines electrical insulation, power electronics, and charging interface requirements. Integrating these segmentation lenses allows product teams to map technical trade-offs to customer use cases, prioritize R&D investments, and tailor supplier contracts to the constraints and opportunities inherent in each segment.
Regional strategic comparisons explaining how distinct regulatory environments, supply chain strengths, and customer requirements shape product and sourcing choices across global markets
Regional dynamics exert a pronounced influence on product design choices, supply chain orientation, and commercialization strategies across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific. In the Americas, producers and OEMs often prioritize localized value chains, regulatory compliance for emissions and safety, and integration pathways that favor compatibility with existing vehicle platforms; procurement strategies in the region emphasize supplier reliability, certification processes, and the ability to support aftermarket service networks. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a technology-forward demand mix where stringent emissions policies, urban mobility initiatives, and a strong focus on sustainability drive investments in high-efficiency motor topologies, lifecycle analysis, and recycling programs, while regulatory complexity across jurisdictions necessitates rigorous homologation approaches.
Asia‑Pacific remains a manufacturing and innovation hub with deep supply chain specialization in magnet materials, copper processing, and precision electro-mechanical assembly; this region is characterized by rapid adoption cycles, aggressive cost improvement programs, and a dense supplier ecosystem that supports scale. Differences in regional infrastructure, charging ecosystems, and commercial vehicle fleet characteristics further shape motor selection, cooling systems, and voltage platform choices. Taken together, regional insights inform where to locate engineering centers, how to structure dual sourcing strategies, and which partnerships best accelerate time to market while balancing cost, risk, and performance expectations.
A strategic appraisal of competitive behaviors showing how technical specialization, partnerships, and production strategy determine commercial positioning and supplier advantage
Competitive dynamics among key companies are being reshaped by technology specialization, vertical integration, strategic partnerships, and targeted capital allocation. Industry leaders that pair deep motor engineering capabilities with power electronics integration and robust validation protocols are better positioned to deliver differentiated propositions across diverse vehicle platforms. At the same time, nimble specialists focusing on niche innovations-such as advanced magnet recycling, high‑speed machining, or vacuum impregnation techniques-are securing strategic relationships with OEMs seeking performance upgrades without extensive redesigns.
Partnership models are broadening to include joint development agreements with automotive OEMs, co-investments in localized production capacity, and cross‑sector collaborations with battery and inverter suppliers to optimize system efficiency. Companies are increasingly investing in digital twins and accelerated test methods to compress development cycles and improve first‑time reliability. Procurement decisions now factor in not only unit cost but also supplier capabilities in engineering support, failure analysis, and long‑term serviceability. This competitive landscape rewards firms that combine technical depth, supply chain resilience, and a clear go‑to‑market approach aligned with fleet electrification timelines and regulatory requirements.
Actionable and prioritized recommendations for leaders to align engineering, procurement, and commercialization efforts while strengthening resilience and time to market
Industry leaders should adopt a set of actionable priorities that align engineering objectives with commercial realities and supply chain resilience mandates. First, embed cross-functional roadmaps that link motor architecture choices to vehicle platform objectives and procurement timelines, enabling synchronized decisions on voltage platforms, cooling systems, and construction formats. Second, accelerate supplier qualification and dual sourcing practices for critical inputs including magnet materials, stator laminations, and precision machining services to reduce single‑point exposure and enhance negotiation leverage.
Third, prioritize investments in design for manufacturability and modular architectures that permit platform reuse across passenger, two‑wheeler, and commercial vehicle programs, thereby shortening time to integration and lowering development friction. Fourth, expand testing and validation capabilities, including thermal cycling, high‑torque endurance, and electromagnetic compatibility protocols, to ensure reliability across the full breadth of operating conditions. Fifth, evaluate strategic localization of critical production steps to mitigate tariff and logistics risk while balancing cost and supplier capability. Finally, align R&D investments with sustainability objectives such as magnet recycling and reduced rare earth dependency, which will improve supplier resilience and meet increasingly stringent regulatory and customer expectations.
A rigorous, multi‑modal research methodology combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical literature analysis, supply chain mapping, and scenario validation for decision‑grade insights
The research methodology underlying these insights integrates a multi‑disciplinary approach combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical literature review, and supply chain mapping to ensure robust and decision‑grade analysis. Primary research consisted of structured interviews with design engineers, procurement leads, and system integrators across vehicle OEMs, Tier‑1 suppliers, and independent motor specialists, thereby capturing firsthand perspectives on technical trade-offs, supplier capabilities, and commercial negotiation dynamics. Secondary sources included peer‑reviewed engineering journals, standards documentation, patent disclosures, and publicly available regulatory filings to triangulate technology readiness levels and materials trends.
Analytical rigor was maintained through a layered validation process that cross‑checked interview findings with manufacturing process data and published engineering benchmarks. Scenario analysis was employed to test the sensitivity of sourcing and design decisions to policy shifts and supply chain disruptions. Finally, segmentation and regional insights were derived by synthesizing technical attributes with application requirements, ensuring that recommendations are grounded in both engineering feasibility and commercial applicability. This methodology ensures that the conclusions and recommendations are actionable, traceable, and relevant to decision‑makers shaping electric traction motor strategies.
Concluding synthesis that links technological choices, supply chain resilience, and regulatory responsiveness to practical steps for achieving scalable and sustainable traction motor solutions
In conclusion, the electric traction motor domain is at a critical juncture where design innovation, supply chain strategy, and regulatory forces converge to define competitive advantage. Success will favor organizations that integrate technical excellence with pragmatic sourcing and commercialization strategies, balancing performance objectives with manufacturability and resilience. By adopting modular designs, diversifying supplier footprints, and investing in targeted validation capabilities, companies can reduce integration risk and accelerate adoption across passenger cars, two wheelers, and commercial vehicle applications.
Moreover, responsiveness to tariff dynamics and regional infrastructure differences will determine which firms can sustain margins while meeting aggressive deployment timetables. Long‑term differentiation will stem from capability investments in magnet sourcing alternatives, thermal management innovations, and tighter systems integration across motor and power electronics. The path forward demands coordinated action across engineering, procurement, and commercial functions to translate technical potential into reliable, scalable, and sustainable traction motor solutions that meet evolving customer and regulatory expectations.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A clear and authoritative framing of the electric traction motor ecosystem highlighting technological drivers, supply chain alignment, and product strategy imperatives
The electric traction motor domain stands at the intersection of accelerated electrification objectives, supply chain realignment, and rapid advances in motor architectures and materials science. This introduction frames the ecosystem by outlining the pivotal technological drivers such as higher voltage architectures, cooling innovations, and emerging motor topologies that are reshaping vehicle electrification pathways. It also situates the role of vehicle OEMs, Tier‑1 suppliers, and advanced material manufacturers in choreographing product roadmaps that respond to performance, efficiency, cost, and sustainability demands.
As electrified transport expands across passenger cars, two wheelers, and commercial vehicle segments including buses and heavy duty platforms, the traction motor becomes both a performance differentiator and a strategic procurement focal point. The narrative connects recent engineering advances to practical deployment considerations, including thermal management trade-offs, packaging constraints for in‑wheel versus central mounted designs, and compatibility with evolving voltage tiers. Finally, the introduction underscores the importance of cross-functional alignment-between product engineering, supply chain, and policy teams-to translate technical options into commercially viable and resilient product strategies in the near term.
How rapid technological innovation, system integration, supply chain realignment, and sustainability expectations are collectively redefining electric traction motor strategies
The landscape for electric traction motors is undergoing several transformative shifts driven by technological maturation, regulatory pressures, and evolving customer expectations. First, the transition to higher voltage platforms is enabling greater power density and faster charging possibilities, which in turn incentivizes rethinking insulation, cooling approaches, and power electronics integration. Concurrently, advances in motor topologies-ranging from refined permanent magnet synchronous solutions to robust switched reluctance platforms-are altering the trade space between efficiency, rare earth dependency, and manufacturability.
Second, system-level integration is gaining prominence: motors are no longer standalone components but critical nodes in vehicle electrification architectures that must harmonize with inverters, thermal systems, and vehicle control algorithms. This trend elevates the strategic importance of modular designs that ease integration across different vehicle types. Third, the supply chain is shifting toward localized and resilient sourcing patterns, influenced by trade policies and material geopolitics, prompting manufacturers to diversify supplier bases and explore alternatives to rare earth magnets. Finally, customer expectations around range, reliability, and lifecycle sustainability are forcing continuous refinement of testing protocols, durability benchmarks, and end-of-life strategies, reinforcing a product development cycle that is both faster and more collaborative across disciplines.
How recent tariff measures catalyze supply chain restructuring, design choices, and regional sourcing strategies that drive lasting industrial realignment in electric traction motor procurement
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures can materially reshape supplier selection, cost structures, and strategic sourcing decisions for electric traction motor stakeholders. In response to tariff signals, procurement teams often prioritize supplier diversification and nearshoring to mitigate exposure to cross‑border price volatility and lead‑time uncertainty. This adjustment typically prompts a reassessment of vertically integrated versus outsourced production models, influencing decisions around magnet procurement, stator and rotor manufacturing, and assembly footprints.
Manufacturers react to tariff-driven cost differentials by exploring design optimizations that reduce dependency on tariff‑sensitive components, such as substituting magnet chemistries, increasing the use of wound rotor synchronous architectures where appropriate, or investing in production technologies that lower labor and processing costs. At the same time, strategic players accelerate supplier qualification protocols and deepen partnerships with regional suppliers to preserve performance targets while safeguarding margins. Regulatory shifts also redirect investment flows toward technologies that are less exposed to trade friction, reinforcing resilience through dual sourcing, contractual hedging, and targeted capital expenditure in local production capacity. These combined actions underscore how tariffs act as catalysts for structural supply chain change rather than isolated price shocks.
Practical segmentation intelligence tying vehicle architectures, motor topologies, power band distinctions, cooling strategies, construction formats, and voltage tiers to engineering and commercial choices
Segmentation-driven product and commercial strategies reveal distinct pathways across vehicle architectures, motor technologies, power classes, cooling approaches, construction choices, and voltage domains. When considering vehicle type, manufacturers must address divergent performance and packaging needs across passenger cars, two wheelers, and commercial vehicles, with commercial vehicle considerations extending to buses, heavy commercial vehicles, and light commercial vehicles where torque, endurance, and thermal robustness become preeminent design drivers. Motor type selection spans induction motors, permanent magnet synchronous motors, switched reluctance motors, and wound rotor synchronous motors; within permanent magnet synchronous platforms, the choice between ferrite and rare earth magnet chemistries informs both cost and magnetic performance, while wound rotor synchronous designs offer options between brushless excited and excited wound rotor implementations for specific control and efficiency outcomes.
Power rating segmentation frames distinct engineering priorities across high power classes above 300 kW, medium ranges between 75 and 300 kW, and low power envelopes below 75 kW; high power applications further differentiate between 300–500 kW and greater than 500 kW tiers, while medium power distinctions between 150–300 kW and 75–150 kW guide thermal management and cooling selection. Cooling type decisions between air‑cooled and liquid‑cooled systems impact packaging, weight, and sustained output under duty cycles. Construction choices between central mounted and in‑wheel architectures influence vehicle dynamics and integration complexity, with in‑wheel options subdividing into hub motor and ring motor approaches that carry different unsprung mass and packaging implications. Finally, voltage level segmentation across low voltage below 400 V, medium voltage between 400–800 V, and high voltage above 800 V defines electrical insulation, power electronics, and charging interface requirements. Integrating these segmentation lenses allows product teams to map technical trade-offs to customer use cases, prioritize R&D investments, and tailor supplier contracts to the constraints and opportunities inherent in each segment.
Regional strategic comparisons explaining how distinct regulatory environments, supply chain strengths, and customer requirements shape product and sourcing choices across global markets
Regional dynamics exert a pronounced influence on product design choices, supply chain orientation, and commercialization strategies across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific. In the Americas, producers and OEMs often prioritize localized value chains, regulatory compliance for emissions and safety, and integration pathways that favor compatibility with existing vehicle platforms; procurement strategies in the region emphasize supplier reliability, certification processes, and the ability to support aftermarket service networks. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a technology-forward demand mix where stringent emissions policies, urban mobility initiatives, and a strong focus on sustainability drive investments in high-efficiency motor topologies, lifecycle analysis, and recycling programs, while regulatory complexity across jurisdictions necessitates rigorous homologation approaches.
Asia‑Pacific remains a manufacturing and innovation hub with deep supply chain specialization in magnet materials, copper processing, and precision electro-mechanical assembly; this region is characterized by rapid adoption cycles, aggressive cost improvement programs, and a dense supplier ecosystem that supports scale. Differences in regional infrastructure, charging ecosystems, and commercial vehicle fleet characteristics further shape motor selection, cooling systems, and voltage platform choices. Taken together, regional insights inform where to locate engineering centers, how to structure dual sourcing strategies, and which partnerships best accelerate time to market while balancing cost, risk, and performance expectations.
A strategic appraisal of competitive behaviors showing how technical specialization, partnerships, and production strategy determine commercial positioning and supplier advantage
Competitive dynamics among key companies are being reshaped by technology specialization, vertical integration, strategic partnerships, and targeted capital allocation. Industry leaders that pair deep motor engineering capabilities with power electronics integration and robust validation protocols are better positioned to deliver differentiated propositions across diverse vehicle platforms. At the same time, nimble specialists focusing on niche innovations-such as advanced magnet recycling, high‑speed machining, or vacuum impregnation techniques-are securing strategic relationships with OEMs seeking performance upgrades without extensive redesigns.
Partnership models are broadening to include joint development agreements with automotive OEMs, co-investments in localized production capacity, and cross‑sector collaborations with battery and inverter suppliers to optimize system efficiency. Companies are increasingly investing in digital twins and accelerated test methods to compress development cycles and improve first‑time reliability. Procurement decisions now factor in not only unit cost but also supplier capabilities in engineering support, failure analysis, and long‑term serviceability. This competitive landscape rewards firms that combine technical depth, supply chain resilience, and a clear go‑to‑market approach aligned with fleet electrification timelines and regulatory requirements.
Actionable and prioritized recommendations for leaders to align engineering, procurement, and commercialization efforts while strengthening resilience and time to market
Industry leaders should adopt a set of actionable priorities that align engineering objectives with commercial realities and supply chain resilience mandates. First, embed cross-functional roadmaps that link motor architecture choices to vehicle platform objectives and procurement timelines, enabling synchronized decisions on voltage platforms, cooling systems, and construction formats. Second, accelerate supplier qualification and dual sourcing practices for critical inputs including magnet materials, stator laminations, and precision machining services to reduce single‑point exposure and enhance negotiation leverage.
Third, prioritize investments in design for manufacturability and modular architectures that permit platform reuse across passenger, two‑wheeler, and commercial vehicle programs, thereby shortening time to integration and lowering development friction. Fourth, expand testing and validation capabilities, including thermal cycling, high‑torque endurance, and electromagnetic compatibility protocols, to ensure reliability across the full breadth of operating conditions. Fifth, evaluate strategic localization of critical production steps to mitigate tariff and logistics risk while balancing cost and supplier capability. Finally, align R&D investments with sustainability objectives such as magnet recycling and reduced rare earth dependency, which will improve supplier resilience and meet increasingly stringent regulatory and customer expectations.
A rigorous, multi‑modal research methodology combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical literature analysis, supply chain mapping, and scenario validation for decision‑grade insights
The research methodology underlying these insights integrates a multi‑disciplinary approach combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical literature review, and supply chain mapping to ensure robust and decision‑grade analysis. Primary research consisted of structured interviews with design engineers, procurement leads, and system integrators across vehicle OEMs, Tier‑1 suppliers, and independent motor specialists, thereby capturing firsthand perspectives on technical trade-offs, supplier capabilities, and commercial negotiation dynamics. Secondary sources included peer‑reviewed engineering journals, standards documentation, patent disclosures, and publicly available regulatory filings to triangulate technology readiness levels and materials trends.
Analytical rigor was maintained through a layered validation process that cross‑checked interview findings with manufacturing process data and published engineering benchmarks. Scenario analysis was employed to test the sensitivity of sourcing and design decisions to policy shifts and supply chain disruptions. Finally, segmentation and regional insights were derived by synthesizing technical attributes with application requirements, ensuring that recommendations are grounded in both engineering feasibility and commercial applicability. This methodology ensures that the conclusions and recommendations are actionable, traceable, and relevant to decision‑makers shaping electric traction motor strategies.
Concluding synthesis that links technological choices, supply chain resilience, and regulatory responsiveness to practical steps for achieving scalable and sustainable traction motor solutions
In conclusion, the electric traction motor domain is at a critical juncture where design innovation, supply chain strategy, and regulatory forces converge to define competitive advantage. Success will favor organizations that integrate technical excellence with pragmatic sourcing and commercialization strategies, balancing performance objectives with manufacturability and resilience. By adopting modular designs, diversifying supplier footprints, and investing in targeted validation capabilities, companies can reduce integration risk and accelerate adoption across passenger cars, two wheelers, and commercial vehicle applications.
Moreover, responsiveness to tariff dynamics and regional infrastructure differences will determine which firms can sustain margins while meeting aggressive deployment timetables. Long‑term differentiation will stem from capability investments in magnet sourcing alternatives, thermal management innovations, and tighter systems integration across motor and power electronics. The path forward demands coordinated action across engineering, procurement, and commercial functions to translate technical potential into reliable, scalable, and sustainable traction motor solutions that meet evolving customer and regulatory expectations.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
180 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of digital twin and predictive maintenance solutions for traction motors to minimize downtime
- 5.2. Development of rare earth free traction motor materials driven by geopolitical supply chain risks and sustainability
- 5.3. Standardization of modular electric traction motor platforms to streamline manufacturing across multiple EV segments
- 5.4. Advancements in high power density axial flux motor designs for improved performance in electric vehicles and urban mobility
- 5.5. Implementation of advanced additive manufacturing techniques to reduce production costs of complex motor components at scale
- 5.6. Increasing collaboration between automakers and motor suppliers for co development of next generation electric traction systems
- 5.7. Emergence of integrated on board charger and traction motor units to optimize space and weight in electric vehicle architectures
- 5.8. Growing demand for high torque density traction motors in commercial and heavy duty electric transport applications
- 5.9. Adoption of predictive analytics and IoT enabled sensors for real time monitoring of motor health and performance data
- 5.10. Focus on circular economy initiatives for traction motors including end of life recycling and material reclamation processes
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Electric Traction Motor Market, by Vehicle Type
- 8.1. Commercial Vehicles
- 8.1.1. Buses
- 8.1.2. Heavy Commercial Vehicles
- 8.1.3. Light Commercial Vehicles
- 8.2. Passenger Cars
- 8.3. Two Wheelers
- 9. Electric Traction Motor Market, by Motor Type
- 9.1. Induction Motor
- 9.2. Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
- 9.2.1. Ferrite
- 9.2.2. Rare Earth
- 9.3. Switched Reluctance Motor
- 9.4. Wound Rotor Synchronous Motor
- 9.4.1. Brushless Excited
- 9.4.2. Excited Wound Rotor
- 10. Electric Traction Motor Market, by Power Rating
- 10.1. High Power >300 Kw
- 10.1.1. 300-500 Kw
- 10.1.2. >500 Kw
- 10.2. Low Power <75 Kw
- 10.3. Medium Power 75-300 Kw
- 10.3.1. 150-300 Kw
- 10.3.2. 75-150 Kw
- 11. Electric Traction Motor Market, by Voltage Level
- 11.1. High Voltage >800V
- 11.2. Low Voltage <400V
- 11.3. Medium Voltage 400-800V
- 12. Electric Traction Motor Market, by Construction Type
- 12.1. Central Mounted
- 12.2. In Wheel
- 12.2.1. Hub Motor
- 12.2.2. Ring Motor
- 13. Electric Traction Motor Market, by Cooling Type
- 13.1. Air Cooled
- 13.2. Liquid Cooled
- 14. Electric Traction Motor Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Electric Traction Motor Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Electric Traction Motor Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. CRRC Corporation Limited
- 17.3.2. Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
- 17.3.3. ABB Ltd.
- 17.3.4. Alstom SA
- 17.3.5. Wabtec Corporation
- 17.3.6. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
- 17.3.7. Toshiba Corporation
- 17.3.8. Hitachi, Ltd.
- 17.3.9. Nidec Corporation
- 17.3.10. BorgWarner Inc.
- 17.3.11. BYD Company Limited
- 17.3.12. Tesla, Inc.
- 17.3.13. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 17.3.14. ZF Friedrichshafen AG
- 17.3.15. DENSO CORPORATION
- 17.3.16. Continental AG
- 17.3.17. Schneider Electric SE
- 17.3.18. General Electric Company
- 17.3.19. Magna International Inc.
- 17.3.20. Aisin Corporation
- 17.3.21. Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.22. Valeo SE
- 17.3.23. CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited
- 17.3.24. WEG S.A.
- 17.3.25. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
- 17.3.26. GKN Automotive Limited
- 17.3.27. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
- 17.3.28. Jing-Jin Electric Technologies Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.29. Voith GmbH & Co. KGaA
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
