EV Composites Market by Material Type (Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymer, Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer, Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer), Manufacturing Technology (Compression Molding, Prepreg, Pultrusion), Resin Type, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2
Description
The EV Composites Market was valued at USD 2.39 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.74 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 14.73%, reaching USD 7.17 billion by 2032.
How advanced polymer composites have become indispensable to electric vehicle program strategies by balancing safety, weight reduction, and manufacturability
Electric vehicle programs depend increasingly on advanced composite materials to meet simultaneous objectives of weight reduction, crashworthiness, and battery safety. Composite solutions-ranging from aramid and carbon fiber reinforced polymers to glass fiber systems-are no longer niche alternatives but core elements of vehicle architecture decisions. Engineers and procurement teams face a rapidly evolving landscape where material performance, manufacturability, regulatory compliance, and total cost of ownership must be balanced to deliver commercially viable EV platforms.
The advent of higher-density battery packs and novel pack geometries intensifies demands on enclosure stiffness, thermal management, and impact resistance, driving closer collaboration between OEMs, tier suppliers, and material producers. At the same time, manufacturing technology choices such as compression molding, prepreg workflows, pultrusion, and resin transfer molding influence cycle times, quality consistency, and capital intensity. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper assessment of how compositional choices, process selection, and policy developments collectively shape strategic decisions across the value chain.
The critical tectonic shifts in material science, manufacturing automation, and regulatory pressures that are accelerating composite adoption across electric vehicle platforms
Over recent years the EV composites landscape has shifted from exploratory pilots to scalable adoption as vehicle electrification targets and safety regulations converge. Lightweighting objectives now intersect with battery thermal management and crash-energy strategies, prompting designers to re-evaluate traditional metal-heavy architectures and prioritize composite integration earlier in the development cycle. Concurrently, improvements in fiber technology and resin chemistry have reduced historical trade-offs between toughness and stiffness, enabling broader application across battery enclosures, chassis parts, and structural components.
Manufacturing transformations have accelerated this momentum. The maturation of automation tools, improved prepreg formulations that tolerate faster curing, and advancements in resin transfer molding have reduced per-unit cycle times and diminished labor intensity for complex shapes. Meanwhile, circularity and end-of-life considerations are driving innovation in bio-based epoxies and resin systems compatible with mechanical recycling or repurposing. Geopolitical dynamics and trade policy volatility also encourage diversified sourcing and regional capacity alignment. Collectively, these shifts create both opportunity and urgency for program leaders to integrate materials strategy, process capability, and supplier relationships into holistic EV system planning.
How cumulative tariff actions in 2025 are reshaping sourcing strategies, regional capacity investment, and material selection calculus across the electric vehicle composites ecosystem
The introduction of new tariff measures and trade policy adjustments in 2025 has created a wave of strategic re-assessment among composite buyers, suppliers, and OEMs. Tariff-related cost pressures have a multi-dimensional impact: they elevate landed material costs, reconfigure sourcing preferences, and influence decisions regarding regional production footprints. Buying organizations are responding by adopting a mix of short-term hedging and longer-term structural shifts such as nearshoring critical supply lines and qualifying secondary suppliers to ensure continuity of supply.
Beyond procurement tactics, the tariffs have implications for technology pathways and design choices. When import-related cost increases affect premium carbon fiber grades, engineering teams are evaluating material substitution strategies-trading off specific stiffness or tensile properties in favor of hybrid constructions that combine aramid, glass, and carbon fibers to preserve performance while controlling cost. Suppliers, in turn, are accelerating local capacity expansions and exploring licensing or joint-venture models to mitigate tariff exposure. Regulatory compliance, customs classification, and origin-tracing have become operational priorities, requiring closer coordination between supply chain, legal, and engineering teams to sustain program schedules and cost targets.
A multidimensional segmentation framework linking material type, application, manufacturing technology, and resin chemistry to practical design and procurement decisions for EV composites
Segmentation analysis reveals nuanced pathways for product development and procurement that reflect material performance, functional demands, manufacturing constraints, and resin chemistry. When analyzing material types, aramid fiber reinforced polymers such as Kevlar 29 and Kevlar 49 offer superior impact resistance for battery enclosures and targeted chassis reinforcements, while carbon fiber reinforced polymer options-ranging from intermediate grade to premium grade-deliver unmatched specific stiffness for body panels and structural load paths. Glass fiber reinforced polymers, including both E Glass and S Glass variants, present a cost-effective balance of strength and formability for large exterior panels where absolute weight minimization is less critical.
Application segmentation highlights where technical priorities differ: battery enclosures emphasize puncture resistance and thermal stability, with module housings and pack housings requiring distinct integration strategies; body panels require surface quality and paintability for elements like front fascia and side skirts; chassis and structural components demand predictable fatigue behavior and joining methods compatible with body in white and exterior panel subassemblies. Manufacturing technology segmentation further refines decision criteria. Compression molding, whether cold press or high pressure, can deliver high throughput for certain thermoset formulations, while prepreg routes with autoclave or hot press processing remain preferred for premium stiffness-critical structures. Pultrusion and resin transfer molding (standard or vacuum assisted) enable efficient continuous or complex-shape production but impose differing constraints on fiber orientation and tooling investment. Resin type shapes long-term durability and environmental performance: epoxy systems, including bio-based and thermoset variants, support high-performance structural bonds; polyester chemistries such as isophthalic and orthophthalic formulations focus on cost-effectiveness and corrosion resistance; vinyl ester families, from bisphenol A to novolac derivatives, offer balanced chemical resistance and toughness for demanding environments.
How regional regulatory frameworks, industrial capabilities, and sustainability priorities are creating differentiated pathways for composite adoption across major global markets
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on strategic priorities for composite adoption and supply chain design. In the Americas, OEMs and tier suppliers are aligning investments with localized production needs and regulatory demands, prioritizing onshore capacity for critical components while pursuing partnerships to accelerate technology transfer. This region shows heightened attention to collision safety standards, repairability protocols, and incentives tied to domestic content that shape procurement and qualification timelines.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, advanced OEM-engineering depth, and a mature supplier base drive a strong emphasis on high-performance fibers and circularity initiatives. Manufacturers in this region are often first adopters of bio-based resin trials and closed-loop material recovery pilots, reflecting both regulatory pressures and sustainability commitments. The Asia-Pacific arena remains a hub for large-volume manufacturing capacity and raw material production. Here, rapid scale-up capabilities coexist with diversified supplier ecosystems, enabling aggressive cost optimization and iterative process improvements. However, the region also faces increasing scrutiny on export controls and environmental compliance, prompting selective reshoring and joint venture arrangements with western OEMs.
Why corporate strategies are shifting toward integrated partnerships, localized capacity expansion, and technology differentiation to secure EV composite value chains and accelerate program qualification
Company strategies in the composites value chain are evolving from transactional supplier relationships toward deeper collaborative models that integrate R&D, tooling, and program-level risk sharing. Leading material producers are investing in fibre and resin formulations optimized for EV-specific performance targets while expanding localized manufacturing footprints to reduce logistical exposure. Tier suppliers are differentiating through systems-level capabilities-offering integrated battery enclosure assemblies, bonded body-in-white subframes, and validated joining solutions that streamline OEM integration.
Strategic partnerships, licensing arrangements, and selective vertical integration are becoming common as companies seek to secure feedstock access, proprietary process know-how, and accelerated time-to-market. Many technology leaders are also pursuing recycling and reclamation pilots to address end-of-life requirements and to position themselves favorably against emerging regulatory regimes. Intellectual property related to automated layup, fast-curing resin systems, and modular tooling represents a critical competitive moat. As a result, procurement teams increasingly evaluate suppliers on metrics beyond unit cost, including technology roadmaps, qualification speed, and resilience of multi-tier supply networks.
Practical, high-impact strategic actions that procurement, engineering, and commercial leaders should prioritize now to future-proof EV composite programs and supply chains
Industry leaders must act decisively to convert material and process insights into program-level advantages. First, procurement and engineering should jointly develop multi-sourcing strategies that prioritize supplier qualification, technical collaboration clauses, and dual-sourcing for critical fibers and resins to cushion tariff and geopolitical risks. Concurrently, investment in modular tooling and flexible manufacturing platforms will enable rapid product changes and cross-program utilization, reducing the capital burden of bespoke equipment.
Design teams should adopt hybrid material approaches where appropriate, combining aramid, carbon, and glass reinforcements to balance cost and performance while standardizing interfaces for assembly. Strategic partnerships with resin and fiber innovators can shorten qualification cycles for bio-based and fast-cure chemistries. Operationally, leaders should implement origin-traceability systems and customs classification audits to minimize exposure to policy shifts. Finally, embedding circularity pilots-mechanical recycling, remanufacturing of thermoset composites where feasible, and supplier take-back programs-will mitigate regulatory risk and create long-term supply advantages as sustainability requirements tighten.
A transparent, multi-method research approach combining expert interviews, factory observations, patent analysis, and scenario testing to validate composite technology and supply chain insights
This analysis synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs sourced through a structured multi-method research approach. Primary data collection included structured interviews with OEM materials engineers, senior procurement leads, tier supplier executives, and subject-matter experts in fiber and resin chemistry. These engagements were complemented by technology validation workshops, factory floor observations of compression molding and RTM operations, and third-party patent landscape reviews to capture innovation trajectories.
Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed literature on composite mechanics, regulatory documentation related to battery safety and trade policy, and supplier technical datasheets for fiber and resin systems. Findings were triangulated through cross-validation of interview insights, process observations, and documentary evidence. Scenario analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity of sourcing and manufacturing choices to tariff and supply-disruption variables. Limitations include the rapid evolution of material formulations and proprietary process improvements that may alter implementation timelines; where appropriate, the report highlights these areas as candidates for ongoing monitoring and supplier audit.
A concise synthesis reinforcing why coordinated materials strategy, process investment, and supply chain resilience are essential to extract value from EV composite innovation
Advanced composites are now a strategic lever for EV program competitiveness, offering pathways to enhance safety, reduce weight, and enable novel packaging solutions. However, realizing these benefits requires coordinated decisions across material selection, manufacturing technology, supplier relationships, and regulatory navigation. The interplay of trade policy, regional industrial capability, and advancing resin and fiber technologies makes it imperative that stakeholders adopt integrated strategies that hedge risk while accelerating qualification timelines.
In practical terms, success will favor organizations that marry technical rigor with commercial agility: those that can qualify multiple material pathways, deploy flexible manufacturing architectures, and secure resilient supplier networks will be best positioned to capture performance advantages without sacrificing cost or timing. Continued monitoring of policy developments, targeted investment in automation and circularity, and proactive collaboration across the value chain will convert composite opportunities into sustainable, scalable program wins.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
How advanced polymer composites have become indispensable to electric vehicle program strategies by balancing safety, weight reduction, and manufacturability
Electric vehicle programs depend increasingly on advanced composite materials to meet simultaneous objectives of weight reduction, crashworthiness, and battery safety. Composite solutions-ranging from aramid and carbon fiber reinforced polymers to glass fiber systems-are no longer niche alternatives but core elements of vehicle architecture decisions. Engineers and procurement teams face a rapidly evolving landscape where material performance, manufacturability, regulatory compliance, and total cost of ownership must be balanced to deliver commercially viable EV platforms.
The advent of higher-density battery packs and novel pack geometries intensifies demands on enclosure stiffness, thermal management, and impact resistance, driving closer collaboration between OEMs, tier suppliers, and material producers. At the same time, manufacturing technology choices such as compression molding, prepreg workflows, pultrusion, and resin transfer molding influence cycle times, quality consistency, and capital intensity. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper assessment of how compositional choices, process selection, and policy developments collectively shape strategic decisions across the value chain.
The critical tectonic shifts in material science, manufacturing automation, and regulatory pressures that are accelerating composite adoption across electric vehicle platforms
Over recent years the EV composites landscape has shifted from exploratory pilots to scalable adoption as vehicle electrification targets and safety regulations converge. Lightweighting objectives now intersect with battery thermal management and crash-energy strategies, prompting designers to re-evaluate traditional metal-heavy architectures and prioritize composite integration earlier in the development cycle. Concurrently, improvements in fiber technology and resin chemistry have reduced historical trade-offs between toughness and stiffness, enabling broader application across battery enclosures, chassis parts, and structural components.
Manufacturing transformations have accelerated this momentum. The maturation of automation tools, improved prepreg formulations that tolerate faster curing, and advancements in resin transfer molding have reduced per-unit cycle times and diminished labor intensity for complex shapes. Meanwhile, circularity and end-of-life considerations are driving innovation in bio-based epoxies and resin systems compatible with mechanical recycling or repurposing. Geopolitical dynamics and trade policy volatility also encourage diversified sourcing and regional capacity alignment. Collectively, these shifts create both opportunity and urgency for program leaders to integrate materials strategy, process capability, and supplier relationships into holistic EV system planning.
How cumulative tariff actions in 2025 are reshaping sourcing strategies, regional capacity investment, and material selection calculus across the electric vehicle composites ecosystem
The introduction of new tariff measures and trade policy adjustments in 2025 has created a wave of strategic re-assessment among composite buyers, suppliers, and OEMs. Tariff-related cost pressures have a multi-dimensional impact: they elevate landed material costs, reconfigure sourcing preferences, and influence decisions regarding regional production footprints. Buying organizations are responding by adopting a mix of short-term hedging and longer-term structural shifts such as nearshoring critical supply lines and qualifying secondary suppliers to ensure continuity of supply.
Beyond procurement tactics, the tariffs have implications for technology pathways and design choices. When import-related cost increases affect premium carbon fiber grades, engineering teams are evaluating material substitution strategies-trading off specific stiffness or tensile properties in favor of hybrid constructions that combine aramid, glass, and carbon fibers to preserve performance while controlling cost. Suppliers, in turn, are accelerating local capacity expansions and exploring licensing or joint-venture models to mitigate tariff exposure. Regulatory compliance, customs classification, and origin-tracing have become operational priorities, requiring closer coordination between supply chain, legal, and engineering teams to sustain program schedules and cost targets.
A multidimensional segmentation framework linking material type, application, manufacturing technology, and resin chemistry to practical design and procurement decisions for EV composites
Segmentation analysis reveals nuanced pathways for product development and procurement that reflect material performance, functional demands, manufacturing constraints, and resin chemistry. When analyzing material types, aramid fiber reinforced polymers such as Kevlar 29 and Kevlar 49 offer superior impact resistance for battery enclosures and targeted chassis reinforcements, while carbon fiber reinforced polymer options-ranging from intermediate grade to premium grade-deliver unmatched specific stiffness for body panels and structural load paths. Glass fiber reinforced polymers, including both E Glass and S Glass variants, present a cost-effective balance of strength and formability for large exterior panels where absolute weight minimization is less critical.
Application segmentation highlights where technical priorities differ: battery enclosures emphasize puncture resistance and thermal stability, with module housings and pack housings requiring distinct integration strategies; body panels require surface quality and paintability for elements like front fascia and side skirts; chassis and structural components demand predictable fatigue behavior and joining methods compatible with body in white and exterior panel subassemblies. Manufacturing technology segmentation further refines decision criteria. Compression molding, whether cold press or high pressure, can deliver high throughput for certain thermoset formulations, while prepreg routes with autoclave or hot press processing remain preferred for premium stiffness-critical structures. Pultrusion and resin transfer molding (standard or vacuum assisted) enable efficient continuous or complex-shape production but impose differing constraints on fiber orientation and tooling investment. Resin type shapes long-term durability and environmental performance: epoxy systems, including bio-based and thermoset variants, support high-performance structural bonds; polyester chemistries such as isophthalic and orthophthalic formulations focus on cost-effectiveness and corrosion resistance; vinyl ester families, from bisphenol A to novolac derivatives, offer balanced chemical resistance and toughness for demanding environments.
How regional regulatory frameworks, industrial capabilities, and sustainability priorities are creating differentiated pathways for composite adoption across major global markets
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on strategic priorities for composite adoption and supply chain design. In the Americas, OEMs and tier suppliers are aligning investments with localized production needs and regulatory demands, prioritizing onshore capacity for critical components while pursuing partnerships to accelerate technology transfer. This region shows heightened attention to collision safety standards, repairability protocols, and incentives tied to domestic content that shape procurement and qualification timelines.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, advanced OEM-engineering depth, and a mature supplier base drive a strong emphasis on high-performance fibers and circularity initiatives. Manufacturers in this region are often first adopters of bio-based resin trials and closed-loop material recovery pilots, reflecting both regulatory pressures and sustainability commitments. The Asia-Pacific arena remains a hub for large-volume manufacturing capacity and raw material production. Here, rapid scale-up capabilities coexist with diversified supplier ecosystems, enabling aggressive cost optimization and iterative process improvements. However, the region also faces increasing scrutiny on export controls and environmental compliance, prompting selective reshoring and joint venture arrangements with western OEMs.
Why corporate strategies are shifting toward integrated partnerships, localized capacity expansion, and technology differentiation to secure EV composite value chains and accelerate program qualification
Company strategies in the composites value chain are evolving from transactional supplier relationships toward deeper collaborative models that integrate R&D, tooling, and program-level risk sharing. Leading material producers are investing in fibre and resin formulations optimized for EV-specific performance targets while expanding localized manufacturing footprints to reduce logistical exposure. Tier suppliers are differentiating through systems-level capabilities-offering integrated battery enclosure assemblies, bonded body-in-white subframes, and validated joining solutions that streamline OEM integration.
Strategic partnerships, licensing arrangements, and selective vertical integration are becoming common as companies seek to secure feedstock access, proprietary process know-how, and accelerated time-to-market. Many technology leaders are also pursuing recycling and reclamation pilots to address end-of-life requirements and to position themselves favorably against emerging regulatory regimes. Intellectual property related to automated layup, fast-curing resin systems, and modular tooling represents a critical competitive moat. As a result, procurement teams increasingly evaluate suppliers on metrics beyond unit cost, including technology roadmaps, qualification speed, and resilience of multi-tier supply networks.
Practical, high-impact strategic actions that procurement, engineering, and commercial leaders should prioritize now to future-proof EV composite programs and supply chains
Industry leaders must act decisively to convert material and process insights into program-level advantages. First, procurement and engineering should jointly develop multi-sourcing strategies that prioritize supplier qualification, technical collaboration clauses, and dual-sourcing for critical fibers and resins to cushion tariff and geopolitical risks. Concurrently, investment in modular tooling and flexible manufacturing platforms will enable rapid product changes and cross-program utilization, reducing the capital burden of bespoke equipment.
Design teams should adopt hybrid material approaches where appropriate, combining aramid, carbon, and glass reinforcements to balance cost and performance while standardizing interfaces for assembly. Strategic partnerships with resin and fiber innovators can shorten qualification cycles for bio-based and fast-cure chemistries. Operationally, leaders should implement origin-traceability systems and customs classification audits to minimize exposure to policy shifts. Finally, embedding circularity pilots-mechanical recycling, remanufacturing of thermoset composites where feasible, and supplier take-back programs-will mitigate regulatory risk and create long-term supply advantages as sustainability requirements tighten.
A transparent, multi-method research approach combining expert interviews, factory observations, patent analysis, and scenario testing to validate composite technology and supply chain insights
This analysis synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs sourced through a structured multi-method research approach. Primary data collection included structured interviews with OEM materials engineers, senior procurement leads, tier supplier executives, and subject-matter experts in fiber and resin chemistry. These engagements were complemented by technology validation workshops, factory floor observations of compression molding and RTM operations, and third-party patent landscape reviews to capture innovation trajectories.
Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed literature on composite mechanics, regulatory documentation related to battery safety and trade policy, and supplier technical datasheets for fiber and resin systems. Findings were triangulated through cross-validation of interview insights, process observations, and documentary evidence. Scenario analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity of sourcing and manufacturing choices to tariff and supply-disruption variables. Limitations include the rapid evolution of material formulations and proprietary process improvements that may alter implementation timelines; where appropriate, the report highlights these areas as candidates for ongoing monitoring and supplier audit.
A concise synthesis reinforcing why coordinated materials strategy, process investment, and supply chain resilience are essential to extract value from EV composite innovation
Advanced composites are now a strategic lever for EV program competitiveness, offering pathways to enhance safety, reduce weight, and enable novel packaging solutions. However, realizing these benefits requires coordinated decisions across material selection, manufacturing technology, supplier relationships, and regulatory navigation. The interplay of trade policy, regional industrial capability, and advancing resin and fiber technologies makes it imperative that stakeholders adopt integrated strategies that hedge risk while accelerating qualification timelines.
In practical terms, success will favor organizations that marry technical rigor with commercial agility: those that can qualify multiple material pathways, deploy flexible manufacturing architectures, and secure resilient supplier networks will be best positioned to capture performance advantages without sacrificing cost or timing. Continued monitoring of policy developments, targeted investment in automation and circularity, and proactive collaboration across the value chain will convert composite opportunities into sustainable, scalable program wins.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
183 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growth of thermoplastic composites for high-volume EV structural components with rapid cycle times
- 5.2. Adoption of continuous fiber-reinforced polymers to reduce battery pack weight and improve safety
- 5.3. Integration of hybrid composite-metal joints enabling optimized load transfer in EV chassis
- 5.4. Development of fire-retardant composite materials for enhanced battery enclosure safety in electric vehicles
- 5.5. Use of recycled carbon fiber composites to meet sustainability targets and reduce production costs in EV manufacturing
- 5.6. Emergence of automated fiber placement technology for precision mass production of EV composite parts
- 5.7. Demand for composite thermal management solutions to enhance EV battery performance and longevity
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. EV Composites Market, by Material Type
- 8.1. Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymer
- 8.2. Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer
- 8.2.1. Intermediate Grade
- 8.2.2. Premium Grade
- 8.2.3. Standard Grade
- 8.3. Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer
- 9. EV Composites Market, by Manufacturing Technology
- 9.1. Compression Molding
- 9.1.1. Cold Press Process
- 9.1.2. High Pressure Process
- 9.2. Prepreg
- 9.2.1. Autoclave Process
- 9.2.2. Hot Press Process
- 9.3. Pultrusion
- 9.3.1. Continuous Pultrusion
- 9.3.2. Discontinuous Pultrusion
- 9.4. Resin Transfer Molding
- 9.4.1. Standard Rtm
- 9.4.2. Vacuum Assisted Rtm
- 10. EV Composites Market, by Resin Type
- 10.1. Epoxy
- 10.1.1. Bio Based Epoxy
- 10.1.2. Thermoset Epoxy
- 10.2. Polyester
- 10.2.1. Isophthalic Polyester
- 10.2.2. Orthophthalic Polyester
- 10.3. Vinyl Ester
- 10.3.1. Bisphenol A Vinyl Ester
- 10.3.2. Novolac Vinyl Ester
- 11. EV Composites Market, by Application
- 11.1. Battery Enclosures
- 11.1.1. Module Housings
- 11.1.2. Pack Housings
- 11.2. Body Panels
- 11.2.1. Front Fascia
- 11.2.2. Side Skirts
- 11.3. Chassis Parts
- 11.4. Structural Components
- 11.4.1. Body In White
- 11.4.2. Exterior Panels
- 12. EV Composites Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. EV Composites Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. EV Composites Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Atlas Fibre
- 15.3.2. CIE Automotive India
- 15.3.3. DI Composites International TRB Lightweight Structures
- 15.3.4. ElringKlinger AG
- 15.3.5. Envalior
- 15.3.6. Exel Composites
- 15.3.7. Faurecia
- 15.3.8. Hexcel Corporation
- 15.3.9. Kautex Textron GmbH & Co. KG
- 15.3.10. Mar-Bal, Inc.
- 15.3.11. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
- 15.3.12. Owens Corning
- 15.3.13. Piran Advanced Composites
- 15.3.14. Plastic Omnium
- 15.3.15. PPG Industries, Inc.
- 15.3.16. Röchling SE & Co. KG
- 15.3.17. Saint-Gobain S.A.
- 15.3.18. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- 15.3.19. SGL Carbon
- 15.3.20. Syensqo Group
- 15.3.21. Teijin Limited
- 15.3.22. The Gund Company
- 15.3.23. Toray Industries, Inc.
- 15.3.24. ZhongAo Carbon
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
