Double Suction Pump Market by Pump Design (Horizontal Split Case, Vertical Split Case, Barrel Case), Stage (Single-Stage, Multi-Stage), Impeller Material, Pump Size, Driver Type, Bearing Type, Installation Orientation, Sales Channel, End-Use Industry - Gl
Description
The Double Suction Pump Market was valued at USD 22.54 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 24.02 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.23%, reaching USD 39.43 billion by 2032.
Understanding double suction pump fundamentals and why lifecycle performance, materials, and serviceability now determine procurement decisions for heavy industry
Double suction pumps continue to underpin critical fluid-handling infrastructure across heavy industry, utilities, and petrochemical operations. These pumps are prized for their axial load cancellation, balanced hydraulics, and capacity to handle high flow rates with improved operational stability. As end users demand greater uptime and lower life-cycle costs, engineering teams increasingly evaluate double suction designs for applications that require sustained large-volume throughput combined with moderate to high head conditions.
In recent years, attention has shifted beyond core hydraulic performance to factors that determine total cost of ownership. Material selection, seal systems, bearing arrangements, and modular serviceability now drive procurement decisions as much as nominal capacity curves. Meanwhile, energy efficiency regulations and corporate sustainability targets have elevated the importance of pump hydraulics optimization and electric motor efficiency pairings. These forces converge to redefine procurement criteria and create a larger role for advanced testing, field diagnostics, and aftermarket services.
Transitioning from product-centric procurement to lifetime-value thinking, stakeholders demand integrated solutions: pumps supplied with condition-monitoring capabilities, spare-parts contracts, and documented maintenance pathways. As a result, manufacturers that pair engineering excellence with robust service models are seeing differentiated acceptance among industrial buyers. Forward-looking organizations are preparing for increased regulatory scrutiny and advocating for standardized performance metrics to facilitate fair comparison across suppliers.
How energy efficiency mandates, digitalization, and supply chain realignment are reshaping product strategies and service models across the double suction pump landscape
The landscape for double suction pumps is undergoing transformative shifts driven by rising energy-efficiency expectations, tighter environmental standards, and a strategic re-evaluation of supply chains. Driven by both regulatory pressure and corporate sustainability agendas, end users now prioritize hydraulic designs that minimize energy consumption across operating envelopes and that pair with high-efficiency drives. Concurrently, the move toward electrification and decarbonization elevates the role of pumps as energy-intensive assets where incremental efficiency gains translate into meaningful operational savings.
Technological developments in sensor integration and digitalization are reshaping service models. Predictive maintenance enabled by condition monitoring reduces unplanned downtime and alters aftermarket economics, turning one-off equipment purchases into long-term service relationships. Additive manufacturing and advanced metallurgy have begun to influence component lead times and valve geometries, enabling bespoke solutions for erosive or corrosive process streams. Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions and trade policy adjustments are prompting manufacturers and end users to reconfigure sourcing strategies, with an emphasis on regional manufacturing hubs and supplier redundancy.
These shifts are gradual but cumulative: as design, material, and service innovations diffuse across the industry, the competitive advantage accrues to firms that can integrate engineering rigor with a flexible supply model and digital service overlays. For buyers, this means placing growing weight on suppliers’ ability to provide lifecycle documentation, local service coverage, and clear pathways for future upgrades.
Assessing how the 2025 tariff measures in the United States triggered accelerated supply chain localization, contractual redesigns, and aftermarket strategic shifts across pump supply networks
The imposition of tariffs in the United States during 2025 introduced a material recalibration for global suppliers and domestic buyers of double suction pumps. Tariff measures affected the cost base for imported assemblies, spare parts, and raw materials, prompting buyers to reassess sourcing strategies and consider nearshoring or qualifying alternative regional suppliers. In turn, suppliers faced immediate pressure to adapt commercial models, renegotiate long-term contracts, and evaluate the feasibility of localized manufacturing to preserve competitiveness in the US market.
Operationally, the tariff environment accelerated existing trends toward inventory buffering and dual-sourcing for critical components. Many engineering procurement teams responded by adjusting procurement windows and by increasing emphasis on parts interchangeability to reduce single-source vulnerabilities. At the same time, OEMs with established manufacturing footprints outside tariff-impacted regions leveraged their local facilities to offer quicker lead times and tariff-insulated pricing, creating a competitive premium for localized production.
Longer-term strategic reactions included intensified investments in regional service centers and extended warranty frameworks to capture aftermarket value that became more attractive as upfront import costs rose. Moreover, companies pursued closer collaboration with distributors and EPC contractors to redesign contracts that accounted for potential tariff volatility. Collectively, these adaptations reinforced a broader market movement toward supply chain resilience, with price pass-through, localization, and contractual flexibility emerging as dominant risk-mitigation tactics.
Deconstructing demand through a multidimensional segmentation lens to reveal how material, flow, head, and application priorities drive purchase criteria and product configuration choices
Insight into demand dynamics emerges when segmentation is examined across multiple technical and application dimensions. Based on End Use Industry, market is studied across End Use Industry, Flow Rate Range, Head Range, Material, Power Rating, and Pump Type. The End Use Industry is further studied across Chemical, Oil And Gas, Power Generation, and Water And Wastewater. The Flow Rate Range is further studied across 1000 To 2000 M3/H, Above 2000 M3/H, and Up To 1000 M3/H. The Head Range is further studied across 50 To 100 M, Above 100 M, and Up To 50 M. The Material is further studied across Cast Iron, Ductile Iron, and Stainless Steel. The Power Rating is further studied across 200 To 500 Kw, Above 500 Kw, and Up To 200 Kw. The Pump Type is further studied across Horizontal and Vertical.
Analyzing these segments together reveals that end users in chemical and oil and gas applications increasingly prioritize corrosion-resistant materials and serviceable seal housings to manage abrasive or chemically aggressive streams. In power generation and water and wastewater contexts, flow rate and head profiles determine whether horizontal or vertical pump orientations are preferred, with both types offering distinct installation and maintenance trade-offs. Higher power ratings correspond with industrial processes demanding robust bearing systems and thermal management, whereas lower power ranges favor compact designs that facilitate retrofitting into existing skids.
Taken collectively, segmentation analysis underscores the necessity for suppliers to offer configurable portfolios that match material specifications, hydraulic envelopes, and motor pairings to specific end-use reliability requirements. Accordingly, value propositions that combine modularity, standardized interfaces, and rapid spare parts availability resonate strongly with procurement teams who must balance performance with lifecycle affordability.
Comparing regional procurement priorities and service expectations across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific to reveal differentiated demand drivers and supplier strategies
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on procurement practices, regulatory expectations, and supplier networks. In the Americas, investment emphasis centers on infrastructure renewal and resilience, with industrial operators seeking partners that can provide robust aftermarket presence and rapid field support. This region values local fabrication and service hubs that minimize logistics friction and accelerate project timelines. Conversely, Europe, Middle East & Africa prioritize stringent energy-efficiency standards, compliance documentation, and lifecycle sustainability; buyers in these markets often demand demonstrable performance improvements and certifications that align with regional regulatory frameworks.
In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid industrialization and large-scale water and power projects create sustained demand for high-capacity pumping solutions and competitive manufacturing ecosystems. Manufacturers here have focused on scale, cost optimization, and production agility to serve both domestic and export markets. Across regions, strategic differences manifest in how suppliers structure warranties, spare-parts logistics, and installation support, with regional service architectures proving decisive in purchase decisions. Therefore, a regionally nuanced commercial approach-tailoring product configurations, service SLAs, and delivery models to local expectations-yields measurable advantages in market penetration and customer retention.
How leading manufacturers and service providers combine modular engineering, strategic partnerships, and aftermarket capabilities to secure durable competitive advantage in heavy-duty pump markets
Competitive dynamics in the double suction pump arena emphasize a blend of engineering leadership, service capability, and strategic partnerships. Market leaders are increasingly investing in product modularity to shorten lead times and simplify maintenance, while independent service providers and authorized distributors expand aftermarket reach through localized workshops and digital service contracts. Meanwhile, engineering teams focus on validating pump hydraulics via computational fluid dynamics and field trials, which serve as technical differentiators when selling into performance-sensitive sectors.
Strategic moves include targeted acquisitions to shore up service footprints and to acquire complementary technology such as advanced sealing solutions, sensor suites, or materials expertise. Partnerships with motor suppliers and control-system integrators enable vendors to offer integrated pump-and-drive solutions that simplify procurement and ensure compatibility. Additionally, firms that deliver comprehensive training programs, OEM-certified spare parts, and remote diagnostics secure longer customer relationships and higher aftermarket revenue streams. Ultimately, companies that harmonize product engineering with responsive service delivery and strong channel relationships tend to achieve superior retention and margin profiles.
Actionable strategic moves for manufacturers and buyers to strengthen competitiveness through efficiency upgrades, modular design, supply chain diversification, and service monetization
Industry leaders should adopt a multi-pronged strategy that balances product innovation, supply chain resilience, and service transformation to stay ahead. First, prioritize energy-efficiency improvements through optimized hydraulics and premium-efficiency motor pairings to lower lifecycle operating costs and satisfy regulatory requirements. Second, invest in condition-monitoring platforms and remote diagnostics to transition from reactive to predictive service models, which reduce downtime and strengthen recurring revenue streams.
Third, diversify supply base and evaluate regional manufacturing or contract production to mitigate tariff exposure and transportation risk. Fourth, enhance modularity and standardized interfaces across pump lines to simplify parts inventory and accelerate field repairs. Fifth, develop integrated commercial offerings that bundle equipment, installation, and multi-year service agreements to deliver transparent total-cost-of-ownership propositions to buyers. Finally, engage proactively with industry bodies and regulators to shape standards that recognize energy performance and lifecycle impacts, thereby creating a level playing field for innovation-driven suppliers. Executing these actions will require cross-functional coordination between engineering, commercial, and operations teams, but the outcomes will materially improve resilience and commercial differentiation.
A rigorous mixed-methods research framework combining primary interviews, technical validation, and secondary policy and patent analysis to produce actionable industry insights
The research behind these insights blends qualitative expert interviews, technical literature analysis, and field-level data triangulation to ensure robust conclusions. Primary research included structured conversations with procurement leads, chief engineers, aftermarket managers, and distributor executives to capture real-world decision criteria and service expectations. Technical validation incorporated review of engineering specifications, test reports, and industry standards to contextualize performance claims and material selection trade-offs.
Secondary research surveyed public regulatory guidance, patent filings, and trade documentation to map policy and technological trends that influence design and sourcing. Where applicable, case studies and anonymized project post-mortems were used to illustrate procurement outcomes and the commercial impact of supply chain disruptions. Findings were synthesized through a cross-disciplinary analyst review to reconcile commercial drivers with engineering realities and to ensure the report’s recommendations reflect operational feasibility and strategic relevance across geographies.
Concluding synthesis that ties together lifecycle performance, supply chain resilience, and service innovation as the decisive factors shaping future competitiveness in double suction pump markets
In sum, the double suction pump sector is at an inflection point where engineering performance, supply chain strategy, and service innovation intersect to determine commercial winners. The growing emphasis on energy efficiency and lifecycle value is compelling buyers to look beyond purchase price and to prioritize long-term reliability, maintainability, and service assurance. Concurrently, geopolitical and trade developments have underscored the need for diversified sourcing and regional manufacturing options to manage cost exposure and delivery risk.
Manufacturers that align product roadmaps with digital service platforms, that adopt modularity in design, and that invest in localized service infrastructures will be best positioned to capture demand across industrial, power, and water applications. By focusing on these strategic imperatives, stakeholders can convert current market headwinds into opportunities for differentiation, cost optimization, and more predictable aftermarket revenues. The industry’s next chapter will reward those who act decisively to integrate engineering excellence with resilient commercial models.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Understanding double suction pump fundamentals and why lifecycle performance, materials, and serviceability now determine procurement decisions for heavy industry
Double suction pumps continue to underpin critical fluid-handling infrastructure across heavy industry, utilities, and petrochemical operations. These pumps are prized for their axial load cancellation, balanced hydraulics, and capacity to handle high flow rates with improved operational stability. As end users demand greater uptime and lower life-cycle costs, engineering teams increasingly evaluate double suction designs for applications that require sustained large-volume throughput combined with moderate to high head conditions.
In recent years, attention has shifted beyond core hydraulic performance to factors that determine total cost of ownership. Material selection, seal systems, bearing arrangements, and modular serviceability now drive procurement decisions as much as nominal capacity curves. Meanwhile, energy efficiency regulations and corporate sustainability targets have elevated the importance of pump hydraulics optimization and electric motor efficiency pairings. These forces converge to redefine procurement criteria and create a larger role for advanced testing, field diagnostics, and aftermarket services.
Transitioning from product-centric procurement to lifetime-value thinking, stakeholders demand integrated solutions: pumps supplied with condition-monitoring capabilities, spare-parts contracts, and documented maintenance pathways. As a result, manufacturers that pair engineering excellence with robust service models are seeing differentiated acceptance among industrial buyers. Forward-looking organizations are preparing for increased regulatory scrutiny and advocating for standardized performance metrics to facilitate fair comparison across suppliers.
How energy efficiency mandates, digitalization, and supply chain realignment are reshaping product strategies and service models across the double suction pump landscape
The landscape for double suction pumps is undergoing transformative shifts driven by rising energy-efficiency expectations, tighter environmental standards, and a strategic re-evaluation of supply chains. Driven by both regulatory pressure and corporate sustainability agendas, end users now prioritize hydraulic designs that minimize energy consumption across operating envelopes and that pair with high-efficiency drives. Concurrently, the move toward electrification and decarbonization elevates the role of pumps as energy-intensive assets where incremental efficiency gains translate into meaningful operational savings.
Technological developments in sensor integration and digitalization are reshaping service models. Predictive maintenance enabled by condition monitoring reduces unplanned downtime and alters aftermarket economics, turning one-off equipment purchases into long-term service relationships. Additive manufacturing and advanced metallurgy have begun to influence component lead times and valve geometries, enabling bespoke solutions for erosive or corrosive process streams. Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions and trade policy adjustments are prompting manufacturers and end users to reconfigure sourcing strategies, with an emphasis on regional manufacturing hubs and supplier redundancy.
These shifts are gradual but cumulative: as design, material, and service innovations diffuse across the industry, the competitive advantage accrues to firms that can integrate engineering rigor with a flexible supply model and digital service overlays. For buyers, this means placing growing weight on suppliers’ ability to provide lifecycle documentation, local service coverage, and clear pathways for future upgrades.
Assessing how the 2025 tariff measures in the United States triggered accelerated supply chain localization, contractual redesigns, and aftermarket strategic shifts across pump supply networks
The imposition of tariffs in the United States during 2025 introduced a material recalibration for global suppliers and domestic buyers of double suction pumps. Tariff measures affected the cost base for imported assemblies, spare parts, and raw materials, prompting buyers to reassess sourcing strategies and consider nearshoring or qualifying alternative regional suppliers. In turn, suppliers faced immediate pressure to adapt commercial models, renegotiate long-term contracts, and evaluate the feasibility of localized manufacturing to preserve competitiveness in the US market.
Operationally, the tariff environment accelerated existing trends toward inventory buffering and dual-sourcing for critical components. Many engineering procurement teams responded by adjusting procurement windows and by increasing emphasis on parts interchangeability to reduce single-source vulnerabilities. At the same time, OEMs with established manufacturing footprints outside tariff-impacted regions leveraged their local facilities to offer quicker lead times and tariff-insulated pricing, creating a competitive premium for localized production.
Longer-term strategic reactions included intensified investments in regional service centers and extended warranty frameworks to capture aftermarket value that became more attractive as upfront import costs rose. Moreover, companies pursued closer collaboration with distributors and EPC contractors to redesign contracts that accounted for potential tariff volatility. Collectively, these adaptations reinforced a broader market movement toward supply chain resilience, with price pass-through, localization, and contractual flexibility emerging as dominant risk-mitigation tactics.
Deconstructing demand through a multidimensional segmentation lens to reveal how material, flow, head, and application priorities drive purchase criteria and product configuration choices
Insight into demand dynamics emerges when segmentation is examined across multiple technical and application dimensions. Based on End Use Industry, market is studied across End Use Industry, Flow Rate Range, Head Range, Material, Power Rating, and Pump Type. The End Use Industry is further studied across Chemical, Oil And Gas, Power Generation, and Water And Wastewater. The Flow Rate Range is further studied across 1000 To 2000 M3/H, Above 2000 M3/H, and Up To 1000 M3/H. The Head Range is further studied across 50 To 100 M, Above 100 M, and Up To 50 M. The Material is further studied across Cast Iron, Ductile Iron, and Stainless Steel. The Power Rating is further studied across 200 To 500 Kw, Above 500 Kw, and Up To 200 Kw. The Pump Type is further studied across Horizontal and Vertical.
Analyzing these segments together reveals that end users in chemical and oil and gas applications increasingly prioritize corrosion-resistant materials and serviceable seal housings to manage abrasive or chemically aggressive streams. In power generation and water and wastewater contexts, flow rate and head profiles determine whether horizontal or vertical pump orientations are preferred, with both types offering distinct installation and maintenance trade-offs. Higher power ratings correspond with industrial processes demanding robust bearing systems and thermal management, whereas lower power ranges favor compact designs that facilitate retrofitting into existing skids.
Taken collectively, segmentation analysis underscores the necessity for suppliers to offer configurable portfolios that match material specifications, hydraulic envelopes, and motor pairings to specific end-use reliability requirements. Accordingly, value propositions that combine modularity, standardized interfaces, and rapid spare parts availability resonate strongly with procurement teams who must balance performance with lifecycle affordability.
Comparing regional procurement priorities and service expectations across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific to reveal differentiated demand drivers and supplier strategies
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on procurement practices, regulatory expectations, and supplier networks. In the Americas, investment emphasis centers on infrastructure renewal and resilience, with industrial operators seeking partners that can provide robust aftermarket presence and rapid field support. This region values local fabrication and service hubs that minimize logistics friction and accelerate project timelines. Conversely, Europe, Middle East & Africa prioritize stringent energy-efficiency standards, compliance documentation, and lifecycle sustainability; buyers in these markets often demand demonstrable performance improvements and certifications that align with regional regulatory frameworks.
In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid industrialization and large-scale water and power projects create sustained demand for high-capacity pumping solutions and competitive manufacturing ecosystems. Manufacturers here have focused on scale, cost optimization, and production agility to serve both domestic and export markets. Across regions, strategic differences manifest in how suppliers structure warranties, spare-parts logistics, and installation support, with regional service architectures proving decisive in purchase decisions. Therefore, a regionally nuanced commercial approach-tailoring product configurations, service SLAs, and delivery models to local expectations-yields measurable advantages in market penetration and customer retention.
How leading manufacturers and service providers combine modular engineering, strategic partnerships, and aftermarket capabilities to secure durable competitive advantage in heavy-duty pump markets
Competitive dynamics in the double suction pump arena emphasize a blend of engineering leadership, service capability, and strategic partnerships. Market leaders are increasingly investing in product modularity to shorten lead times and simplify maintenance, while independent service providers and authorized distributors expand aftermarket reach through localized workshops and digital service contracts. Meanwhile, engineering teams focus on validating pump hydraulics via computational fluid dynamics and field trials, which serve as technical differentiators when selling into performance-sensitive sectors.
Strategic moves include targeted acquisitions to shore up service footprints and to acquire complementary technology such as advanced sealing solutions, sensor suites, or materials expertise. Partnerships with motor suppliers and control-system integrators enable vendors to offer integrated pump-and-drive solutions that simplify procurement and ensure compatibility. Additionally, firms that deliver comprehensive training programs, OEM-certified spare parts, and remote diagnostics secure longer customer relationships and higher aftermarket revenue streams. Ultimately, companies that harmonize product engineering with responsive service delivery and strong channel relationships tend to achieve superior retention and margin profiles.
Actionable strategic moves for manufacturers and buyers to strengthen competitiveness through efficiency upgrades, modular design, supply chain diversification, and service monetization
Industry leaders should adopt a multi-pronged strategy that balances product innovation, supply chain resilience, and service transformation to stay ahead. First, prioritize energy-efficiency improvements through optimized hydraulics and premium-efficiency motor pairings to lower lifecycle operating costs and satisfy regulatory requirements. Second, invest in condition-monitoring platforms and remote diagnostics to transition from reactive to predictive service models, which reduce downtime and strengthen recurring revenue streams.
Third, diversify supply base and evaluate regional manufacturing or contract production to mitigate tariff exposure and transportation risk. Fourth, enhance modularity and standardized interfaces across pump lines to simplify parts inventory and accelerate field repairs. Fifth, develop integrated commercial offerings that bundle equipment, installation, and multi-year service agreements to deliver transparent total-cost-of-ownership propositions to buyers. Finally, engage proactively with industry bodies and regulators to shape standards that recognize energy performance and lifecycle impacts, thereby creating a level playing field for innovation-driven suppliers. Executing these actions will require cross-functional coordination between engineering, commercial, and operations teams, but the outcomes will materially improve resilience and commercial differentiation.
A rigorous mixed-methods research framework combining primary interviews, technical validation, and secondary policy and patent analysis to produce actionable industry insights
The research behind these insights blends qualitative expert interviews, technical literature analysis, and field-level data triangulation to ensure robust conclusions. Primary research included structured conversations with procurement leads, chief engineers, aftermarket managers, and distributor executives to capture real-world decision criteria and service expectations. Technical validation incorporated review of engineering specifications, test reports, and industry standards to contextualize performance claims and material selection trade-offs.
Secondary research surveyed public regulatory guidance, patent filings, and trade documentation to map policy and technological trends that influence design and sourcing. Where applicable, case studies and anonymized project post-mortems were used to illustrate procurement outcomes and the commercial impact of supply chain disruptions. Findings were synthesized through a cross-disciplinary analyst review to reconcile commercial drivers with engineering realities and to ensure the report’s recommendations reflect operational feasibility and strategic relevance across geographies.
Concluding synthesis that ties together lifecycle performance, supply chain resilience, and service innovation as the decisive factors shaping future competitiveness in double suction pump markets
In sum, the double suction pump sector is at an inflection point where engineering performance, supply chain strategy, and service innovation intersect to determine commercial winners. The growing emphasis on energy efficiency and lifecycle value is compelling buyers to look beyond purchase price and to prioritize long-term reliability, maintainability, and service assurance. Concurrently, geopolitical and trade developments have underscored the need for diversified sourcing and regional manufacturing options to manage cost exposure and delivery risk.
Manufacturers that align product roadmaps with digital service platforms, that adopt modularity in design, and that invest in localized service infrastructures will be best positioned to capture demand across industrial, power, and water applications. By focusing on these strategic imperatives, stakeholders can convert current market headwinds into opportunities for differentiation, cost optimization, and more predictable aftermarket revenues. The industry’s next chapter will reward those who act decisively to integrate engineering excellence with resilient commercial models.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of IoT-enabled sensors for real-time performance tracking in double suction pumps
- 5.2. Development of high-chrome alloy impellers to enhance corrosion resistance in aggressive fluid applications
- 5.3. Surge in demand for compact vertical double suction pump designs in water treatment plants
- 5.4. Adoption of variable frequency drives for optimized energy consumption in double suction pumping systems
- 5.5. Expansion of modular double suction pump platforms to simplify maintenance and reduce downtime
- 5.6. Growth of API 610 compliance-driven customization in double suction pumps for oil refineries
- 5.7. Emergence of magnetic coupling technology to eliminate seal leakage risks in double suction pumps
- 5.8. Implementation of digital twin modeling for lifecycle management of double suction pump assets
- 5.9. Rising focus on noise reduction innovations in double suction pumps for urban HVAC and commercial buildings
- 5.10. Advances in additive manufacturing enabling rapid prototyping of complex pump components
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Double Suction Pump Market, by Pump Design
- 8.1. Horizontal Split Case
- 8.2. Vertical Split Case
- 8.3. Barrel Case
- 9. Double Suction Pump Market, by Stage
- 9.1. Single-Stage
- 9.2. Multi-Stage
- 10. Double Suction Pump Market, by Impeller Material
- 10.1. Cast Iron
- 10.1.1. Gray Iron
- 10.1.2. Ductile Iron
- 10.2. Stainless Steel
- 10.2.1. 304 Stainless Steel
- 10.2.2. 316 Stainless Steel
- 10.3. Alloy Steel
- 10.4. Bronze
- 10.5. Duplex Stainless Steel
- 11. Double Suction Pump Market, by Pump Size
- 11.1. Up To 150 mm
- 11.2. 150 To 300 mm
- 11.3. 300 To 500 mm
- 11.4. Above 500 mm
- 12. Double Suction Pump Market, by Driver Type
- 12.1. Electric Motor
- 12.2. Diesel Engine
- 12.3. Gas Turbine
- 12.4. Steam Turbine
- 12.5. Hydraulic Turbine
- 13. Double Suction Pump Market, by Bearing Type
- 13.1. Ball Bearing
- 13.2. Roller Bearing
- 13.3. Sleeve Bearing
- 13.4. Hydrodynamic Bearing
- 14. Double Suction Pump Market, by Installation Orientation
- 14.1. Horizontal
- 14.2. Vertical
- 15. Double Suction Pump Market, by Sales Channel
- 15.1. Direct Sales
- 15.2. Distributor Sales
- 15.3. OEM Partnerships
- 15.4. EPC And Project Sales
- 15.5. Online Sales
- 16. Double Suction Pump Market, by End-Use Industry
- 16.1. Water And Wastewater
- 16.1.1. Municipal Water Supply
- 16.1.2. Wastewater Treatment
- 16.1.3. Desalination
- 16.2. Power Generation
- 16.2.1. Thermal Power Plants
- 16.2.2. Nuclear Power Plants
- 16.2.3. Hydro Power Plants
- 16.2.4. Renewable Power Plants Balance Of Plant
- 16.3. Oil And Gas
- 16.3.1. Upstream Operations
- 16.3.2. Midstream Transport
- 16.3.3. Downstream Refining And Petrochemicals
- 16.4. Chemical And Petrochemical
- 16.5. HVAC And Building Services
- 16.6. Mining And Metals
- 16.7. Pulp And Paper
- 16.8. Food And Beverage
- 17. Double Suction Pump Market, by Region
- 17.1. Americas
- 17.1.1. North America
- 17.1.2. Latin America
- 17.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 17.2.1. Europe
- 17.2.2. Middle East
- 17.2.3. Africa
- 17.3. Asia-Pacific
- 18. Double Suction Pump Market, by Group
- 18.1. ASEAN
- 18.2. GCC
- 18.3. European Union
- 18.4. BRICS
- 18.5. G7
- 18.6. NATO
- 19. Double Suction Pump Market, by Country
- 19.1. United States
- 19.2. Canada
- 19.3. Mexico
- 19.4. Brazil
- 19.5. United Kingdom
- 19.6. Germany
- 19.7. France
- 19.8. Russia
- 19.9. Italy
- 19.10. Spain
- 19.11. China
- 19.12. India
- 19.13. Japan
- 19.14. Australia
- 19.15. South Korea
- 20. Competitive Landscape
- 20.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 20.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 20.3. Competitive Analysis
- 20.3.1. Andritz AG
- 20.3.2. DEPUMP TECHNOLOGY SJZ.CO.,LTD.
- 20.3.3. DESMI Pumping Technology A/S
- 20.3.4. Ebara Corporation
- 20.3.5. Flowserve Corporation
- 20.3.6. Gorman-Rupp Company
- 20.3.7. Grundfos Holding A/S
- 20.3.8. ITT Inc.
- 20.3.9. Kirloskar Brothers Limited
- 20.3.10. KSB SE & Co. KGaA
- 20.3.11. Modo Pump Co.,Ltd
- 20.3.12. Patterson Pump Company
- 20.3.13. Pentair plc
- 20.3.14. Ruhrpumpen Group
- 20.3.15. Shanghai Kaiquan Pump Group Co., Ltd.
- 20.3.16. Shanghai Liancheng (Group) Co., Ltd.
- 20.3.17. Shijiazhuang Kingda Pump Industry Group Co., Ltd.
- 20.3.18. SPP Pumps Limited
- 20.3.19. SPX FLOW, Inc.
- 20.3.20. Sulzer Ltd.
- 20.3.21. Torishima Pump Mfg. Co., Ltd.
- 20.3.22. Weir Group plc
- 20.3.23. Wilo SE
- 20.3.24. Xylem Inc.
- 20.3.25. Zhejiang Yonjou Technology Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
