Direct Fiberglass Roving Market by Type (C-Glass, E-Glass, S-Glass), Product Form (Chopped Strand, Rovings, Woven Roving), End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Direct Fiberglass Roving Market was valued at USD 2.35 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 2.49 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.63%, reaching USD 3.69 billion by 2032.
An authoritative orientation to direct fiberglass roving that clarifies technical roles, supply chain realities, and commercial trade-offs that shape strategic decisions
The direct fiberglass roving landscape occupies a pivotal position at the intersection of advanced materials, industrial manufacturing, and decarbonization-driven product evolution. This introduction orients readers to the technical role that roving plays as a reinforcement component across high-performance composites, the evolving expectations from end users for durability and recyclability, and the operational realities facing producers and downstream fabricators. It sets the scene by clarifying how product form and material type determine applicability across distinct sectors, and how supply chain dynamics influence lead times and sourcing strategies.
In the following pages, expect clear delineation of product forms and fiber chemistries, and an exploration of how those attributes translate into mechanical properties, processing requirements, and cost considerations for manufacturers and OEMs. The introduction also underscores the critical importance of regulatory environments and changing trade frameworks in shaping procurement and investment decisions. By framing the subsequent analysis around technical differentiators and commercial drivers, this opening section prepares stakeholders to evaluate trade-offs between performance, manufacturability, and lifecycle outcomes, while situating the discussion within current market and geopolitical contexts.
How concurrent innovations in fiber chemistry, process automation, and sustainability expectations are structurally redefining the fiberglass roving ecosystem
Over recent years, transformative shifts have accelerated across materials innovation, manufacturing processes, and sustainability expectations, and these forces now converge to reshape demand and supply patterns for fiberglass rovings. Advances in fiber chemistry and sizing technologies have improved interfacial bonding and processing speed, prompting downstream converters to rethink laminate architectures and assembly sequences. At the same time, automation in winding, pultrusion, and filament winding has reduced labor sensitivity and tightened tolerances, enabling higher throughput and more consistent product performance.
Concurrently, regulatory and customer-driven sustainability requirements have elevated interest in lifecycle impacts, recyclability, and lower-carbon production routes, which in turn is prompting investments in alternative glass formulations and surface treatments. Trade policy volatility and logistical constraints have encouraged firms to diversify supplier bases and to localize critical operations closer to major end-use clusters. Taken together, these shifts are not incremental but structural: they are changing how product specifications are negotiated, how long-term supplier relationships are constructed, and how capital is allocated toward production capacity and technical R&D.
The cumulative operational and strategic consequences of 2025 trade measures that reshaped sourcing priorities, pricing mechanics, and supplier resilience across the supply chain
The implementation of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 has exerted multi-dimensional effects across procurement strategies, cost structures, and supplier footprints without uniformly increasing demand for any single product form. In the immediate aftermath, buyers reassessed sourcing maps to identify low-risk suppliers and to mitigate exposure to import duty escalation. This reallocation favored suppliers with established regional presence or those able to demonstrate robust compliance and tariff classification expertise. At the same time, some converters accelerated vertical integration or nearshoring initiatives to regain control over input costs and lead-time reliability.
Beyond procurement adjustments, manufacturers revisited contractual terms and pricing mechanics to pass through or absorb incremental trade-related expenses while preserving customer relationships. Strategic players increased focus on value engineering, offering product formulations or processing recommendations that maintain performance while improving cost efficiency. Financial and operational risk management practices also evolved: companies expanded scenario planning, reinforced inventory governance, and revisited hedging strategies to smooth the impact of policy volatility. Over the medium term, tariff-induced reconfigurations have catalyzed supplier selection based on resilience and operational transparency rather than purely lowest-cost criteria.
Actionable segmentation insights that explain how glass type, product form, and end-user application combine to determine performance demands and commercial strategies
Insightful segmentation is central to actionable strategy in the fiberglass roving domain because product performance, processing attributes, and end-user demands vary significantly by material type, product form, and application sector. Based on Type, the market is studied across C-Glass, E-Glass, and S-Glass, each exhibiting distinct mechanical properties and chemical resistance characteristics that make them more suitable for specific engineering demands and environmental exposures. Based on Product Form, the market is studied across Chopped Strand, Rovings, Woven Roving, and Yarn; within these categories, the Chopped Strand is further studied across Long Strand and Short Strand, and the Rovings is further studied across Multi-End Roving and Single-End Roving, reflecting differing processing workflows, reinforcement orientations, and resin impregnation behaviors. Based on End User, the market is studied across Aerospace & Defense, Automotive, Construction, Electrical & Electronics, and Energy & Power, each sector imposing unique performance thresholds, certification requirements, and volume-procurement patterns.
These segmentation layers interact: for example, S-Glass rovings paired with multi-end configurations tend to address high-stress aerospace and defense applications where thermal and tensile performance are prioritized, while E-Glass chopped strand in short lengths is more commonly applied in mass-manufactured automotive composites where cycle time and cost are critical. Understanding these cross-segment dynamics allows manufacturers and buyers to align product development and inventory strategies with the mechanical, certification, and processing needs of targeted end users.
Regional dynamics and strategic implications across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine capacity placement and partnership opportunities
Regional dynamics determine where capacity investments, distribution networks, and innovation clusters coalesce, and leaders must interpret those patterns to position operations and partnerships effectively. In the Americas, demand drivers skew toward high-volume automotive composites, construction materials, and a growing renewable energy segment that requires reliable, regionally proximate supply. Supply chain agility and local content preferences are driving increased interest in nearshoring production and in establishing long-term contractual relationships with domestic converters.
Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, advanced engineering capabilities, and project-driven procurement shape product specifications and supplier selection. This region emphasizes certification, environmental performance, and integration with broader industrial ecosystems, making it a fertile ground for technical collaborations between suppliers and OEMs. In Asia-Pacific, a diverse set of manufacturing hubs supports a broad spectrum of end users, from consumer electronics to heavy industry. Rapid infrastructure development and an active renewable energy buildout sustain demand growth for robust, cost-effective reinforcement solutions. Together, these regional dynamics guide strategic decisions regarding capacity placement, R&D collaboration, and customer engagement models.
How incumbent manufacturers and specialized niche players are differentiating through R&D, process control, and collaborative product development to win technical and commercial advantage
Competitive intensity in fiberglass roving manufacturing combines legacy producers with specialized niche players who focus on high-performance fiber chemistries or advanced surface treatments. The competitive landscape rewards firms that can consistently deliver technical reliability, certification support, and transparent supply-chain documentation. Key companies differentiate through investments in continuous R&D, targeted downstream partnerships, and incremental process automation that raises throughput without compromising quality.
Some players pursue product-driven differentiation, offering proprietary sizings and coupling agents that improve interlaminar strength or resin compatibility. Others compete on operational excellence, optimizing logistics and lean manufacturing to meet just-in-time requirements of large converters. Strategic collaborations between raw glass manufacturers and composite fabricators have emerged to expedite material validation cycles and to co-develop application-specific formulations. For buyers and investors, the relevant evaluation criteria include technological depth, breadth of product forms, ability to scale, and demonstrated capacity to support certification and testing regimes required by regulated end users.
Clear, actionable strategies for manufacturers and buyers to enhance resilience, accelerate material innovation, and convert disruption into competitive advantage
Industry leaders should adopt a multi-pronged strategy that balances near-term resilience with long-term innovation to capture value in a changing fiberglass roving environment. First, prioritize supplier diversification and regional sourcing to reduce exposure to trade and logistics disruption while maintaining quality and certification continuity. This approach should be complemented by targeted investments in automation and quality control systems that lower unit variability and enable quicker scale-up when contract wins materialize.
Second, accelerate material and surface-chemistry innovation by partnering with composite fabricators and resin suppliers to co-develop sizings that improve processing speed and end-use durability. These partnerships shorten validation cycles and create defensible differentiation. Third, embed lifecycle thinking into product development by documenting recyclability attributes and production carbon intensity, thereby aligning with OEM procurement requirements and regulatory trends. Finally, strengthen commercial models by offering technical support packages, custom formulations, and flexible logistics solutions to move from transactional selling to value-based partnerships. By executing these recommendations, leaders can convert external disruption into competitive advantage and revenue stability.
A transparent mixed-methods approach combining technical characterization, supply chain triangulation, and stakeholder interviews to ensure robust and actionable conclusions
This research synthesizes primary interviews with technical leaders, procurement managers, and fabricators, combined with secondary analysis of publicly available technical literature, regulatory filings, and industry white papers to construct a balanced view of product and commercial dynamics. Technical characterization relied on engineering literature and vendor technical datasheets to compare fiber chemistries and sizing approaches in terms of mechanical behavior and processing attributes. Supply chain analysis drew on company disclosures, trade publications, and logistics performance indicators to map sourcing dependencies and potential bottlenecks.
To ensure robustness, findings were triangulated by cross-referencing supplier statements with downstream usage patterns and by validating qualitative themes through multiple independent interviews. The methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions and clear documentation of data provenance for each analytical thread. Where proprietary or confidential data informed strategic recommendations, it was used only in aggregated or anonymized form. The combined approach ensures that conclusions reflect both technical realities and commercial considerations, while allowing readers to interpret implications in light of their specific operational contexts.
A concise synthesis highlighting resilience, innovation partnerships, and lifecycle alignment as the core imperatives for sustained leadership in fiberglass roving
In conclusion, direct fiberglass roving remains an essential enabling material for a wide range of composite applications, and its strategic importance will continue as industries pursue lighter, stronger, and more sustainable solutions. The convergence of improved fiber chemistries, advanced automation, and heightened sustainability expectations is reshaping supplier selection, product development, and go-to-market strategies. Companies that proactively address tariff-driven sourcing challenges, that invest in targeted R&D partnerships, and that embed lifecycle considerations into product design will be better positioned to capture long-term value.
Decision-makers should focus on integrating technical, commercial, and regulatory signals into coherent roadmaps that prioritize resilient supply chains, differentiated product offerings, and customer-centric service models. By doing so, organizations can mitigate near-term disruption while laying the groundwork for innovation-led growth in high-value segments such as aerospace, renewable energy, and advanced industrial applications. The path forward requires disciplined execution, collaborative innovation, and a clear focus on aligning material performance with end-user requirements.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative orientation to direct fiberglass roving that clarifies technical roles, supply chain realities, and commercial trade-offs that shape strategic decisions
The direct fiberglass roving landscape occupies a pivotal position at the intersection of advanced materials, industrial manufacturing, and decarbonization-driven product evolution. This introduction orients readers to the technical role that roving plays as a reinforcement component across high-performance composites, the evolving expectations from end users for durability and recyclability, and the operational realities facing producers and downstream fabricators. It sets the scene by clarifying how product form and material type determine applicability across distinct sectors, and how supply chain dynamics influence lead times and sourcing strategies.
In the following pages, expect clear delineation of product forms and fiber chemistries, and an exploration of how those attributes translate into mechanical properties, processing requirements, and cost considerations for manufacturers and OEMs. The introduction also underscores the critical importance of regulatory environments and changing trade frameworks in shaping procurement and investment decisions. By framing the subsequent analysis around technical differentiators and commercial drivers, this opening section prepares stakeholders to evaluate trade-offs between performance, manufacturability, and lifecycle outcomes, while situating the discussion within current market and geopolitical contexts.
How concurrent innovations in fiber chemistry, process automation, and sustainability expectations are structurally redefining the fiberglass roving ecosystem
Over recent years, transformative shifts have accelerated across materials innovation, manufacturing processes, and sustainability expectations, and these forces now converge to reshape demand and supply patterns for fiberglass rovings. Advances in fiber chemistry and sizing technologies have improved interfacial bonding and processing speed, prompting downstream converters to rethink laminate architectures and assembly sequences. At the same time, automation in winding, pultrusion, and filament winding has reduced labor sensitivity and tightened tolerances, enabling higher throughput and more consistent product performance.
Concurrently, regulatory and customer-driven sustainability requirements have elevated interest in lifecycle impacts, recyclability, and lower-carbon production routes, which in turn is prompting investments in alternative glass formulations and surface treatments. Trade policy volatility and logistical constraints have encouraged firms to diversify supplier bases and to localize critical operations closer to major end-use clusters. Taken together, these shifts are not incremental but structural: they are changing how product specifications are negotiated, how long-term supplier relationships are constructed, and how capital is allocated toward production capacity and technical R&D.
The cumulative operational and strategic consequences of 2025 trade measures that reshaped sourcing priorities, pricing mechanics, and supplier resilience across the supply chain
The implementation of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 has exerted multi-dimensional effects across procurement strategies, cost structures, and supplier footprints without uniformly increasing demand for any single product form. In the immediate aftermath, buyers reassessed sourcing maps to identify low-risk suppliers and to mitigate exposure to import duty escalation. This reallocation favored suppliers with established regional presence or those able to demonstrate robust compliance and tariff classification expertise. At the same time, some converters accelerated vertical integration or nearshoring initiatives to regain control over input costs and lead-time reliability.
Beyond procurement adjustments, manufacturers revisited contractual terms and pricing mechanics to pass through or absorb incremental trade-related expenses while preserving customer relationships. Strategic players increased focus on value engineering, offering product formulations or processing recommendations that maintain performance while improving cost efficiency. Financial and operational risk management practices also evolved: companies expanded scenario planning, reinforced inventory governance, and revisited hedging strategies to smooth the impact of policy volatility. Over the medium term, tariff-induced reconfigurations have catalyzed supplier selection based on resilience and operational transparency rather than purely lowest-cost criteria.
Actionable segmentation insights that explain how glass type, product form, and end-user application combine to determine performance demands and commercial strategies
Insightful segmentation is central to actionable strategy in the fiberglass roving domain because product performance, processing attributes, and end-user demands vary significantly by material type, product form, and application sector. Based on Type, the market is studied across C-Glass, E-Glass, and S-Glass, each exhibiting distinct mechanical properties and chemical resistance characteristics that make them more suitable for specific engineering demands and environmental exposures. Based on Product Form, the market is studied across Chopped Strand, Rovings, Woven Roving, and Yarn; within these categories, the Chopped Strand is further studied across Long Strand and Short Strand, and the Rovings is further studied across Multi-End Roving and Single-End Roving, reflecting differing processing workflows, reinforcement orientations, and resin impregnation behaviors. Based on End User, the market is studied across Aerospace & Defense, Automotive, Construction, Electrical & Electronics, and Energy & Power, each sector imposing unique performance thresholds, certification requirements, and volume-procurement patterns.
These segmentation layers interact: for example, S-Glass rovings paired with multi-end configurations tend to address high-stress aerospace and defense applications where thermal and tensile performance are prioritized, while E-Glass chopped strand in short lengths is more commonly applied in mass-manufactured automotive composites where cycle time and cost are critical. Understanding these cross-segment dynamics allows manufacturers and buyers to align product development and inventory strategies with the mechanical, certification, and processing needs of targeted end users.
Regional dynamics and strategic implications across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine capacity placement and partnership opportunities
Regional dynamics determine where capacity investments, distribution networks, and innovation clusters coalesce, and leaders must interpret those patterns to position operations and partnerships effectively. In the Americas, demand drivers skew toward high-volume automotive composites, construction materials, and a growing renewable energy segment that requires reliable, regionally proximate supply. Supply chain agility and local content preferences are driving increased interest in nearshoring production and in establishing long-term contractual relationships with domestic converters.
Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, advanced engineering capabilities, and project-driven procurement shape product specifications and supplier selection. This region emphasizes certification, environmental performance, and integration with broader industrial ecosystems, making it a fertile ground for technical collaborations between suppliers and OEMs. In Asia-Pacific, a diverse set of manufacturing hubs supports a broad spectrum of end users, from consumer electronics to heavy industry. Rapid infrastructure development and an active renewable energy buildout sustain demand growth for robust, cost-effective reinforcement solutions. Together, these regional dynamics guide strategic decisions regarding capacity placement, R&D collaboration, and customer engagement models.
How incumbent manufacturers and specialized niche players are differentiating through R&D, process control, and collaborative product development to win technical and commercial advantage
Competitive intensity in fiberglass roving manufacturing combines legacy producers with specialized niche players who focus on high-performance fiber chemistries or advanced surface treatments. The competitive landscape rewards firms that can consistently deliver technical reliability, certification support, and transparent supply-chain documentation. Key companies differentiate through investments in continuous R&D, targeted downstream partnerships, and incremental process automation that raises throughput without compromising quality.
Some players pursue product-driven differentiation, offering proprietary sizings and coupling agents that improve interlaminar strength or resin compatibility. Others compete on operational excellence, optimizing logistics and lean manufacturing to meet just-in-time requirements of large converters. Strategic collaborations between raw glass manufacturers and composite fabricators have emerged to expedite material validation cycles and to co-develop application-specific formulations. For buyers and investors, the relevant evaluation criteria include technological depth, breadth of product forms, ability to scale, and demonstrated capacity to support certification and testing regimes required by regulated end users.
Clear, actionable strategies for manufacturers and buyers to enhance resilience, accelerate material innovation, and convert disruption into competitive advantage
Industry leaders should adopt a multi-pronged strategy that balances near-term resilience with long-term innovation to capture value in a changing fiberglass roving environment. First, prioritize supplier diversification and regional sourcing to reduce exposure to trade and logistics disruption while maintaining quality and certification continuity. This approach should be complemented by targeted investments in automation and quality control systems that lower unit variability and enable quicker scale-up when contract wins materialize.
Second, accelerate material and surface-chemistry innovation by partnering with composite fabricators and resin suppliers to co-develop sizings that improve processing speed and end-use durability. These partnerships shorten validation cycles and create defensible differentiation. Third, embed lifecycle thinking into product development by documenting recyclability attributes and production carbon intensity, thereby aligning with OEM procurement requirements and regulatory trends. Finally, strengthen commercial models by offering technical support packages, custom formulations, and flexible logistics solutions to move from transactional selling to value-based partnerships. By executing these recommendations, leaders can convert external disruption into competitive advantage and revenue stability.
A transparent mixed-methods approach combining technical characterization, supply chain triangulation, and stakeholder interviews to ensure robust and actionable conclusions
This research synthesizes primary interviews with technical leaders, procurement managers, and fabricators, combined with secondary analysis of publicly available technical literature, regulatory filings, and industry white papers to construct a balanced view of product and commercial dynamics. Technical characterization relied on engineering literature and vendor technical datasheets to compare fiber chemistries and sizing approaches in terms of mechanical behavior and processing attributes. Supply chain analysis drew on company disclosures, trade publications, and logistics performance indicators to map sourcing dependencies and potential bottlenecks.
To ensure robustness, findings were triangulated by cross-referencing supplier statements with downstream usage patterns and by validating qualitative themes through multiple independent interviews. The methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions and clear documentation of data provenance for each analytical thread. Where proprietary or confidential data informed strategic recommendations, it was used only in aggregated or anonymized form. The combined approach ensures that conclusions reflect both technical realities and commercial considerations, while allowing readers to interpret implications in light of their specific operational contexts.
A concise synthesis highlighting resilience, innovation partnerships, and lifecycle alignment as the core imperatives for sustained leadership in fiberglass roving
In conclusion, direct fiberglass roving remains an essential enabling material for a wide range of composite applications, and its strategic importance will continue as industries pursue lighter, stronger, and more sustainable solutions. The convergence of improved fiber chemistries, advanced automation, and heightened sustainability expectations is reshaping supplier selection, product development, and go-to-market strategies. Companies that proactively address tariff-driven sourcing challenges, that invest in targeted R&D partnerships, and that embed lifecycle considerations into product design will be better positioned to capture long-term value.
Decision-makers should focus on integrating technical, commercial, and regulatory signals into coherent roadmaps that prioritize resilient supply chains, differentiated product offerings, and customer-centric service models. By doing so, organizations can mitigate near-term disruption while laying the groundwork for innovation-led growth in high-value segments such as aerospace, renewable energy, and advanced industrial applications. The path forward requires disciplined execution, collaborative innovation, and a clear focus on aligning material performance with end-user requirements.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
182 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Direct Fiberglass Roving Market, by Type
- 8.1. C-Glass
- 8.2. E-Glass
- 8.3. S-Glass
- 9. Direct Fiberglass Roving Market, by Product Form
- 9.1. Chopped Strand
- 9.1.1. Long Strand
- 9.1.2. Short Strand
- 9.2. Rovings
- 9.2.1. Multi-End Roving
- 9.2.2. Single-End Roving
- 9.3. Woven Roving
- 9.4. Yarn
- 10. Direct Fiberglass Roving Market, by End User
- 10.1. Aerospace & Defense
- 10.2. Automotive
- 10.3. Construction
- 10.4. Electrical & Electronics
- 10.5. Energy & Power
- 11. Direct Fiberglass Roving Market, by Region
- 11.1. Americas
- 11.1.1. North America
- 11.1.2. Latin America
- 11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 11.2.1. Europe
- 11.2.2. Middle East
- 11.2.3. Africa
- 11.3. Asia-Pacific
- 12. Direct Fiberglass Roving Market, by Group
- 12.1. ASEAN
- 12.2. GCC
- 12.3. European Union
- 12.4. BRICS
- 12.5. G7
- 12.6. NATO
- 13. Direct Fiberglass Roving Market, by Country
- 13.1. United States
- 13.2. Canada
- 13.3. Mexico
- 13.4. Brazil
- 13.5. United Kingdom
- 13.6. Germany
- 13.7. France
- 13.8. Russia
- 13.9. Italy
- 13.10. Spain
- 13.11. China
- 13.12. India
- 13.13. Japan
- 13.14. Australia
- 13.15. South Korea
- 14. United States Direct Fiberglass Roving Market
- 15. China Direct Fiberglass Roving Market
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 16.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 16.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 16.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 16.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 16.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 16.5. AGY Holding Corporation
- 16.6. Chongqing Polycomp International Corporation Limited
- 16.7. INDORE COMPOSITE PVT LTD
- 16.8. Johns Manville Corporation
- 16.9. JUSHI GROUP CO LTD
- 16.10. Jushi Group Co., Ltd.
- 16.11. KCC Corporation
- 16.12. Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd.
- 16.13. Owens Corning
- 16.14. PPG Industries, Inc.
- 16.15. Saint-Gobain Vetrotex
- 16.16. Taishan Fiberglass Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
