Digital Biomanufacturing Market by Product Type (Cell Therapy, Monoclonal Antibodies, Recombinant Proteins), Process Stage (Continuous Biomanufacturing, Downstream Processing, Upstream Processing), Technology, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-
Description
The Digital Biomanufacturing Market was valued at USD 216.66 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 230.60 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.48%, reaching USD 358.06 million by 2032.
A concise orientation to the strategic drivers, operational imperatives, and organizational shifts that define modern digital biomanufacturing landscapes
Digital biomanufacturing sits at the intersection of biology, engineering, and data science, creating a new ecosystem for how biologics are developed, scaled, and delivered. The convergence of automation, single-use technologies, continuous processing paradigms, and advanced analytics is altering traditional workflows and enabling a shift from batch-centric operations to more flexible, modular, and data-driven manufacturing platforms. These changes are not purely technical; they reshape organizational structures, supply chain relationships, regulatory interactions, and capital allocation priorities.
This introduction frames the executive-level lens needed to assess strategic choices. It outlines core drivers such as workforce skills evolution, capital intensity trade-offs between traditional stainless-steel and single-use systems, and the growing importance of digital twins and process analytics to reduce cycle time and improve reproducibility. Readers are guided to appreciate that successful adoption requires synchronized investments in process development, quality by design, and cybersecurity for connected production environments. The narrative sets expectations that subsequent sections will translate these drivers into practical implications for product developers, contract manufacturers, and institutional stakeholders across therapeutic modalities.
Strategic and operational transformations reshaping biomanufacturing through modular platforms, continuous processing, and pervasive digital control systems
The landscape of biomanufacturing is experiencing several transformative shifts that are redefining competitive advantage and operational resilience. Process architecture is moving from large-scale, centralized stainless-steel facilities toward modular, single-use platforms that enable faster changeovers and reduced capital outlay, while continuous bioprocessing strategies are being integrated to compress timelines and stabilize product quality. At the same time, the infusion of digital technologies-real-time sensors, advanced process control, and predictive analytics-creates new levers for improving yield, reducing variability, and enabling remote operations.
These shifts also alter the role of contract development and manufacturing organizations and academic translational centers; partnerships are becoming more strategic and outcomes-focused, with technology transfer efficiency and digital interoperability emerging as critical selection criteria. Regulatory authorities are adapting, encouraging use of data-rich submissions and quality-by-design approaches that emphasize process understanding. Finally, supply chain dynamics are changing as single-use consumables, digitally dependent components, and geographically concentrated raw material suppliers require more sophisticated risk-management and supplier diversification strategies to sustain resilient production.
Assessment of the cumulative effects of 2025 tariff measures on procurement choices, supply chain resilience, and regional manufacturing strategies in biomanufacturing
The tariff landscape introduced in 2025 has introduced a new variable into procurement strategies, supply chain configuration, and cost modeling for biomanufacturers operating or sourcing from the United States. Tariff measures have raised the relative cost of imported components and consumables for some supply lines while incentivizing nearshoring and localized production for critical inputs. This shift prompts organizations to reassess vendor portfolios, logistics routing, and inventory policies to maintain continuity of operations and to mitigate exposure to policy-driven cost volatility.
Consequently, organizations are prioritizing supplier qualification pathways that shorten lead times and diversify sourcing across geographies. Manufacturers are also evaluating the trade-offs between maintaining strategic inventories and investing in process redesign that reduces dependency on tariff-exposed inputs. For entities involved in cross-border technology transfer, tariffs have added complexity to capital planning for new facilities and to decisions about where to site specialized equipment and single-use component supply. The cumulative effect is a stronger emphasis on strategic procurement, scenario-based planning, and increased collaboration with suppliers to secure long-term agreements and co-investment arrangements that stabilize supply and control costs.
Comprehensive segmentation insights revealing how product, process, technology, end-user, and application distinctions drive divergent strategic and operational priorities
A nuanced segmentation analysis illuminates how adoption patterns, investment priorities, and operational requirements vary across product types, process stages, technologies, end users, and applications. When observed by product type, cell therapies present distinct demands with subsegments such as CAR-T therapy, stem cell therapy, and tissue engineering requiring closed systems, stringent chain-of-custody controls, and often localized manufacturing, while monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, and vaccines have differing scale and facility footprints that influence equipment choices and process standardization.
Process stage segmentation highlights divergent priorities across continuous biomanufacturing, downstream processing, and upstream processing. Continuous approaches introduce requirements for integrated analytics and continuous downstream and continuous upstream coordination, whereas downstream processing brings focus to chromatography and filtration selection and optimization. Upstream activities center on bioreactors, cell culture practices, and media optimization, each driving different facility configurations and control strategies. Technology segmentation contrasts single-use systems and traditional systems; single-use solutions including bags, connectors, and sensors reduce turnaround and cleaning needs, while traditional clean-in-place systems and stainless-steel bioreactors remain relevant for high-volume, cost-sensitive applications. End user segmentation shows academic organizations, biopharmaceutical companies, contract development and manufacturing organizations, and research institutes each prioritizing different capabilities, with academic organizations often tied to government research labs and universities and emphasizing flexibility and translational pathways. Application segmentation spans diagnostics, industrial enzymes, and therapeutics, with diagnostics subdividing into imaging and in vitro testing and requiring distinct regulatory and validation pathways. Taken together, these intersecting segmentation lenses clarify that strategic choices in manufacturing technology and process architecture must be calibrated to product complexity, regulatory expectations, and the operating model of the end user.
Regional differentiation and strategic implications across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific for deploying resilient and scalable biomanufacturing solutions
Regional dynamics influence technology adoption, regulatory approaches, and supply chain structuring in markedly different ways across major global markets. In the Americas, ecosystem maturity, a concentration of biopharma headquarters, and a robust CDMO network prioritize acceleration to clinical and commercial supply, while innovation hubs drive adoption of single-use solutions and integrated digital platforms. Cross-border trade flows from the region shape supplier strategies and create opportunities for localized value chains that reduce lead times and enhance responsiveness for North American customers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous environment with advanced regulatory harmonization in some jurisdictions and fragmented capability in others, prompting differential adoption of continuous processing and digital control strategies. Policy priorities, public-private partnerships, and regional centers of excellence influence where advanced manufacturing investments are directed. Asia-Pacific demonstrates rapid capacity expansion and ambitious localization initiatives, with governments incentivizing domestic production and raw material self-sufficiency. The region’s manufacturing scale and supplier ecosystems create both competitive pressures and opportunities for global players to partner locally, deploy modular facilities, and tailor solutions to regional regulatory and logistical realities. Recognizing these regional distinctions is essential to crafting deployment plans that respect local policy levers, talent availability, and infrastructure constraints.
Competitive behaviors and partnership strategies by leading players accelerating technology transfer, modular deployment, and integrated solution offerings across the value chain
Key industry participants are accelerating collaborations, technology licensing, and co-development arrangements that align with emergent process paradigms and regulatory preferences. Leading manufacturers and technology providers are investing in demonstrator facilities and digital twin capabilities to validate continuous processing workflows and to showcase the benefits of integrated analytics. Partnerships between equipment suppliers and process developers are streamlining technology transfer to contract manufacturers and end users, reducing time-to-deployment for new therapies and process innovations.
Several companies are also diversifying product portfolios to offer end-to-end solutions encompassing single-use consumables, bioreactor platforms, and control software, enabling customers to simplify procurement and vendor management. The CDMO sector is carving out specialized offerings for cell and gene therapies, providing localized manufacturing and chain-of-custody services that meet high-touch regulatory expectations. Across the value chain, organizations that combine deep domain expertise with scalable digital platforms and robust quality systems are differentiating themselves as preferred partners for complex biologics development and manufacturing programs.
Actionable strategic initiatives for leaders to accelerate modularization, strengthen supply resilience, and embed analytics-driven process control across operations
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of actionable initiatives to secure advantage in an increasingly digital and modular manufacturing environment. First, aligning capital allocation to support modular facility designs and single-use adoption where appropriate will reduce time-to-market and provide flexibility to serve multiple product classes. Concurrent investments in analytics and process control will yield operational gains by improving yield consistency and reducing batch failures, and these investments should be planned in tandem with workforce training programs to ensure new systems are effectively operated and maintained.
Second, manufacturers should pursue strategic supplier partnerships and multi-source agreements to mitigate the risk of supply disruption and tariff exposures. Scenario-based procurement planning, including evaluating localized sourcing options and vendor co-investment models, can provide long-term security while preserving cost predictability. Third, establishing robust data governance and cybersecurity practices is essential as increased digitization creates new vectors for operational risk. Finally, organizations should build regulatory engagement plans that prioritize early dialogue, leverage data-rich submissions, and incorporate quality-by-design principles to expedite approvals and reduce post-approval changes. These steps, when coordinated across commercial, technical, and regulatory functions, translate strategic intent into operational resilience and market readiness.
Transparent mixed-methods research methodology integrating expert interviews, technical literature synthesis, and scenario mapping to validate practical adoption pathways
The research synthesis draws on a mixed-methods approach combining expert interviews, primary qualitative engagement, and secondary synthesis of publicly available technical literature and regulatory guidance. Expert interviews were conducted with senior manufacturing leaders, technology suppliers, regulatory affairs specialists, and contract manufacturing executives to capture firsthand perspectives on process adoption barriers, technology validation pathways, and partnership models. These engagements informed thematic coding and scenario mapping to surface common pain points, enablers, and emergent best practices.
Secondary literature review focused on peer-reviewed process engineering studies, regulatory guidance documents, and technical white papers that describe continuous processing, single-use adoption, and digital analytics applications. The methodology applied triangulation to validate claims across data sources, ensuring conclusions reflect both practitioner experience and documented technical outcomes. Throughout, the approach emphasized transparency in assumption framing, a careful distinction between observed practice and aspirational strategy, and the use of use-case exemplars to illustrate how technologies can be combined to address specific product and process challenges.
Synthesis and strategic takeaways emphasizing coordinated investments in technology, talent, and supplier ecosystems to realize durable operational advantages
In conclusion, digital biomanufacturing represents a strategic shift that extends beyond equipment and raw materials to encompass organizational design, regulatory engagement, and supplier ecosystems. The combined trajectory of modular single-use adoption, continuous processing integration, and digital control systems creates opportunities to accelerate development, stabilize quality, and respond more rapidly to therapeutic demand. However, realizing these benefits requires coordinated investments in talent, data governance, and supply chain resilience to manage new dependencies and regulatory expectations.
Leaders who proactively align capital plans, forge collaborative supplier relationships, and invest in analytics-driven process control will be better positioned to translate technology potential into operational advantage. Equally, organizations that treat regulatory engagement as an ongoing, data-informed dialogue will reduce approval friction and enable smoother scale-up. The path forward is iterative: early pilots, rigorous validation, and incremental scale provide the most reliable route to sustainable transformation while preserving product quality and patient safety.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to the strategic drivers, operational imperatives, and organizational shifts that define modern digital biomanufacturing landscapes
Digital biomanufacturing sits at the intersection of biology, engineering, and data science, creating a new ecosystem for how biologics are developed, scaled, and delivered. The convergence of automation, single-use technologies, continuous processing paradigms, and advanced analytics is altering traditional workflows and enabling a shift from batch-centric operations to more flexible, modular, and data-driven manufacturing platforms. These changes are not purely technical; they reshape organizational structures, supply chain relationships, regulatory interactions, and capital allocation priorities.
This introduction frames the executive-level lens needed to assess strategic choices. It outlines core drivers such as workforce skills evolution, capital intensity trade-offs between traditional stainless-steel and single-use systems, and the growing importance of digital twins and process analytics to reduce cycle time and improve reproducibility. Readers are guided to appreciate that successful adoption requires synchronized investments in process development, quality by design, and cybersecurity for connected production environments. The narrative sets expectations that subsequent sections will translate these drivers into practical implications for product developers, contract manufacturers, and institutional stakeholders across therapeutic modalities.
Strategic and operational transformations reshaping biomanufacturing through modular platforms, continuous processing, and pervasive digital control systems
The landscape of biomanufacturing is experiencing several transformative shifts that are redefining competitive advantage and operational resilience. Process architecture is moving from large-scale, centralized stainless-steel facilities toward modular, single-use platforms that enable faster changeovers and reduced capital outlay, while continuous bioprocessing strategies are being integrated to compress timelines and stabilize product quality. At the same time, the infusion of digital technologies-real-time sensors, advanced process control, and predictive analytics-creates new levers for improving yield, reducing variability, and enabling remote operations.
These shifts also alter the role of contract development and manufacturing organizations and academic translational centers; partnerships are becoming more strategic and outcomes-focused, with technology transfer efficiency and digital interoperability emerging as critical selection criteria. Regulatory authorities are adapting, encouraging use of data-rich submissions and quality-by-design approaches that emphasize process understanding. Finally, supply chain dynamics are changing as single-use consumables, digitally dependent components, and geographically concentrated raw material suppliers require more sophisticated risk-management and supplier diversification strategies to sustain resilient production.
Assessment of the cumulative effects of 2025 tariff measures on procurement choices, supply chain resilience, and regional manufacturing strategies in biomanufacturing
The tariff landscape introduced in 2025 has introduced a new variable into procurement strategies, supply chain configuration, and cost modeling for biomanufacturers operating or sourcing from the United States. Tariff measures have raised the relative cost of imported components and consumables for some supply lines while incentivizing nearshoring and localized production for critical inputs. This shift prompts organizations to reassess vendor portfolios, logistics routing, and inventory policies to maintain continuity of operations and to mitigate exposure to policy-driven cost volatility.
Consequently, organizations are prioritizing supplier qualification pathways that shorten lead times and diversify sourcing across geographies. Manufacturers are also evaluating the trade-offs between maintaining strategic inventories and investing in process redesign that reduces dependency on tariff-exposed inputs. For entities involved in cross-border technology transfer, tariffs have added complexity to capital planning for new facilities and to decisions about where to site specialized equipment and single-use component supply. The cumulative effect is a stronger emphasis on strategic procurement, scenario-based planning, and increased collaboration with suppliers to secure long-term agreements and co-investment arrangements that stabilize supply and control costs.
Comprehensive segmentation insights revealing how product, process, technology, end-user, and application distinctions drive divergent strategic and operational priorities
A nuanced segmentation analysis illuminates how adoption patterns, investment priorities, and operational requirements vary across product types, process stages, technologies, end users, and applications. When observed by product type, cell therapies present distinct demands with subsegments such as CAR-T therapy, stem cell therapy, and tissue engineering requiring closed systems, stringent chain-of-custody controls, and often localized manufacturing, while monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, and vaccines have differing scale and facility footprints that influence equipment choices and process standardization.
Process stage segmentation highlights divergent priorities across continuous biomanufacturing, downstream processing, and upstream processing. Continuous approaches introduce requirements for integrated analytics and continuous downstream and continuous upstream coordination, whereas downstream processing brings focus to chromatography and filtration selection and optimization. Upstream activities center on bioreactors, cell culture practices, and media optimization, each driving different facility configurations and control strategies. Technology segmentation contrasts single-use systems and traditional systems; single-use solutions including bags, connectors, and sensors reduce turnaround and cleaning needs, while traditional clean-in-place systems and stainless-steel bioreactors remain relevant for high-volume, cost-sensitive applications. End user segmentation shows academic organizations, biopharmaceutical companies, contract development and manufacturing organizations, and research institutes each prioritizing different capabilities, with academic organizations often tied to government research labs and universities and emphasizing flexibility and translational pathways. Application segmentation spans diagnostics, industrial enzymes, and therapeutics, with diagnostics subdividing into imaging and in vitro testing and requiring distinct regulatory and validation pathways. Taken together, these intersecting segmentation lenses clarify that strategic choices in manufacturing technology and process architecture must be calibrated to product complexity, regulatory expectations, and the operating model of the end user.
Regional differentiation and strategic implications across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific for deploying resilient and scalable biomanufacturing solutions
Regional dynamics influence technology adoption, regulatory approaches, and supply chain structuring in markedly different ways across major global markets. In the Americas, ecosystem maturity, a concentration of biopharma headquarters, and a robust CDMO network prioritize acceleration to clinical and commercial supply, while innovation hubs drive adoption of single-use solutions and integrated digital platforms. Cross-border trade flows from the region shape supplier strategies and create opportunities for localized value chains that reduce lead times and enhance responsiveness for North American customers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous environment with advanced regulatory harmonization in some jurisdictions and fragmented capability in others, prompting differential adoption of continuous processing and digital control strategies. Policy priorities, public-private partnerships, and regional centers of excellence influence where advanced manufacturing investments are directed. Asia-Pacific demonstrates rapid capacity expansion and ambitious localization initiatives, with governments incentivizing domestic production and raw material self-sufficiency. The region’s manufacturing scale and supplier ecosystems create both competitive pressures and opportunities for global players to partner locally, deploy modular facilities, and tailor solutions to regional regulatory and logistical realities. Recognizing these regional distinctions is essential to crafting deployment plans that respect local policy levers, talent availability, and infrastructure constraints.
Competitive behaviors and partnership strategies by leading players accelerating technology transfer, modular deployment, and integrated solution offerings across the value chain
Key industry participants are accelerating collaborations, technology licensing, and co-development arrangements that align with emergent process paradigms and regulatory preferences. Leading manufacturers and technology providers are investing in demonstrator facilities and digital twin capabilities to validate continuous processing workflows and to showcase the benefits of integrated analytics. Partnerships between equipment suppliers and process developers are streamlining technology transfer to contract manufacturers and end users, reducing time-to-deployment for new therapies and process innovations.
Several companies are also diversifying product portfolios to offer end-to-end solutions encompassing single-use consumables, bioreactor platforms, and control software, enabling customers to simplify procurement and vendor management. The CDMO sector is carving out specialized offerings for cell and gene therapies, providing localized manufacturing and chain-of-custody services that meet high-touch regulatory expectations. Across the value chain, organizations that combine deep domain expertise with scalable digital platforms and robust quality systems are differentiating themselves as preferred partners for complex biologics development and manufacturing programs.
Actionable strategic initiatives for leaders to accelerate modularization, strengthen supply resilience, and embed analytics-driven process control across operations
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of actionable initiatives to secure advantage in an increasingly digital and modular manufacturing environment. First, aligning capital allocation to support modular facility designs and single-use adoption where appropriate will reduce time-to-market and provide flexibility to serve multiple product classes. Concurrent investments in analytics and process control will yield operational gains by improving yield consistency and reducing batch failures, and these investments should be planned in tandem with workforce training programs to ensure new systems are effectively operated and maintained.
Second, manufacturers should pursue strategic supplier partnerships and multi-source agreements to mitigate the risk of supply disruption and tariff exposures. Scenario-based procurement planning, including evaluating localized sourcing options and vendor co-investment models, can provide long-term security while preserving cost predictability. Third, establishing robust data governance and cybersecurity practices is essential as increased digitization creates new vectors for operational risk. Finally, organizations should build regulatory engagement plans that prioritize early dialogue, leverage data-rich submissions, and incorporate quality-by-design principles to expedite approvals and reduce post-approval changes. These steps, when coordinated across commercial, technical, and regulatory functions, translate strategic intent into operational resilience and market readiness.
Transparent mixed-methods research methodology integrating expert interviews, technical literature synthesis, and scenario mapping to validate practical adoption pathways
The research synthesis draws on a mixed-methods approach combining expert interviews, primary qualitative engagement, and secondary synthesis of publicly available technical literature and regulatory guidance. Expert interviews were conducted with senior manufacturing leaders, technology suppliers, regulatory affairs specialists, and contract manufacturing executives to capture firsthand perspectives on process adoption barriers, technology validation pathways, and partnership models. These engagements informed thematic coding and scenario mapping to surface common pain points, enablers, and emergent best practices.
Secondary literature review focused on peer-reviewed process engineering studies, regulatory guidance documents, and technical white papers that describe continuous processing, single-use adoption, and digital analytics applications. The methodology applied triangulation to validate claims across data sources, ensuring conclusions reflect both practitioner experience and documented technical outcomes. Throughout, the approach emphasized transparency in assumption framing, a careful distinction between observed practice and aspirational strategy, and the use of use-case exemplars to illustrate how technologies can be combined to address specific product and process challenges.
Synthesis and strategic takeaways emphasizing coordinated investments in technology, talent, and supplier ecosystems to realize durable operational advantages
In conclusion, digital biomanufacturing represents a strategic shift that extends beyond equipment and raw materials to encompass organizational design, regulatory engagement, and supplier ecosystems. The combined trajectory of modular single-use adoption, continuous processing integration, and digital control systems creates opportunities to accelerate development, stabilize quality, and respond more rapidly to therapeutic demand. However, realizing these benefits requires coordinated investments in talent, data governance, and supply chain resilience to manage new dependencies and regulatory expectations.
Leaders who proactively align capital plans, forge collaborative supplier relationships, and invest in analytics-driven process control will be better positioned to translate technology potential into operational advantage. Equally, organizations that treat regulatory engagement as an ongoing, data-informed dialogue will reduce approval friction and enable smoother scale-up. The path forward is iterative: early pilots, rigorous validation, and incremental scale provide the most reliable route to sustainable transformation while preserving product quality and patient safety.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
182 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Implementation of AI-powered process analytical technology to enhance real-time quality control in biomanufacturing lines
- 5.2. Adoption of digital twin simulations for predictive scale-up of cell culture and fermentation workflows in bioproduction facilities
- 5.3. Deployment of cloud-native platforms integrating multiomics data for adaptive monitoring of biologic drug manufacturing performance
- 5.4. Utilization of edge computing and IoT-enabled bioreactors for remote monitoring and automated control of continuous bioprocessing
- 5.5. Integration of blockchain and secure data provenance systems to ensure traceability and compliance across digital biomanufacturing supply chains
- 5.6. Application of machine learning algorithms for predictive maintenance and downtime reduction in large-scale biologics production equipment
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Digital Biomanufacturing Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Cell Therapy
- 8.1.1. Car-T Therapy
- 8.1.2. Stem Cell Therapy
- 8.1.3. Tissue Engineering
- 8.2. Monoclonal Antibodies
- 8.3. Recombinant Proteins
- 8.4. Vaccines
- 9. Digital Biomanufacturing Market, by Process Stage
- 9.1. Continuous Biomanufacturing
- 9.1.1. Continuous Downstream
- 9.1.2. Continuous Upstream
- 9.2. Downstream Processing
- 9.2.1. Chromatography
- 9.2.2. Filtration
- 9.3. Upstream Processing
- 9.3.1. Bioreactors
- 9.3.2. Cell Culture
- 9.3.3. Media
- 10. Digital Biomanufacturing Market, by Technology
- 10.1. Single-Use Systems
- 10.1.1. Bags
- 10.1.2. Connectors
- 10.1.3. Sensors
- 10.2. Traditional Systems
- 10.2.1. Clean-In-Place Systems
- 10.2.2. Stainless-Steel Bioreactors
- 11. Digital Biomanufacturing Market, by Application
- 11.1. Diagnostics
- 11.1.1. Imaging
- 11.1.2. In Vitro Testing
- 11.2. Industrial Enzymes
- 11.3. Therapeutics
- 12. Digital Biomanufacturing Market, by End User
- 12.1. Academic Organizations
- 12.1.1. Government Research Labs
- 12.1.2. Universities
- 12.2. Biopharmaceutical Companies
- 12.3. Contract Development And Manufacturing Organizations
- 12.4. Research Institutes
- 13. Digital Biomanufacturing Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Digital Biomanufacturing Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Digital Biomanufacturing Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. 3M Company
- 16.3.2. 64xBio
- 16.3.3. ABB Ltd.
- 16.3.4. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
- 16.3.5. bioMérieux SA
- 16.3.6. Bota Biosciences, Ltd.
- 16.3.7. CellPort Software
- 16.3.8. Culture Biosciences, Inc.
- 16.3.9. Cytiva (Global Life Sciences Solutions USA LLC)
- 16.3.10. Debut Biotechnology
- 16.3.11. Donaldson Company, Inc.
- 16.3.12. Emerson Electric Co.
- 16.3.13. FabricNano
- 16.3.14. GE Healthcare
- 16.3.15. Indegene Limited
- 16.3.16. OVO Biomanufacturing
- 16.3.17. Samsung Biologics
- 16.3.18. Sanofi SA
- 16.3.19. Sartorius AG
- 16.3.20. Shimadzu Corp.
- 16.3.21. Siemens AG
- 16.3.22. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- 16.3.23. Waters Corp.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
