Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market by Machine Type (Cold Chamber, Hot Chamber), Metal Type (Aluminum, Magnesium, Zinc), Clamping Force, Automation Type, End Use Industry, Sales Channel - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market was valued at USD 911.36 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 991.46 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 9.57%, reaching USD 1,728.47 million by 2032.
A concise introduction to automatic pick-up systems for die casting operations and how they integrate with modern production priorities and quality objectives
The die casting machine automatic pick-up machine represents a pivotal adjunct to modern high-pressure metal casting operations, combining mechanical precision with downstream automation to increase throughput, consistency, and operator safety. These systems are designed to extract, manipulate, and transfer freshly cast components from the die casting cell to secondary operations such as trimming, inspection, or finishing, thereby reducing manual handling and cycle variability. In an era defined by tighter tolerances, higher cadence production for electrification, and stricter environmental controls, automatic pick-up equipment has transitioned from optional extras to integral components of efficient casting lines.
Consequently, stakeholders across original equipment manufacturers, tier suppliers, and captive foundries are reevaluating line architecture and capital allocation to incorporate pick-up automation earlier in project lifecycles. As a result, engineering teams are balancing cycle-time objectives with tool life, molten-metal behavior, and downstream quality control needs. Importantly, this introduction sets the stage for the subsequent sections, which explore technological shifts, trade policy impacts, segmentation-based implications, and strategic recommendations that operators and investors must consider to remain competitive.
How electrification, lightweight alloys, digital automation, and sustainability imperatives are reshaping pick-up automation requirements and procurement strategies
Over recent years, the landscape for die casting automation has experienced transformative shifts driven by four converging forces: rapid adoption of electric vehicle platforms, accelerated emphasis on lightweight alloys, the maturation of industrial automation technologies, and increasing scrutiny on sustainability. Electrification of drivetrains has pushed demand for components that require more complex geometries and higher dimensional precision, prompting integrators to specify pick-up systems that maintain repeatable part orientation and minimize thermal shock during transfer.
Simultaneously, the transition toward aluminum and magnesium alloys for weight reduction has imposed new mechanical and thermal constraints on pick-up grippers, sensors, and cycle timing. In parallel, industrial automation advances-particularly the integration of machine vision, predictive maintenance analytics, and robotic end-of-arm tooling-have enabled tighter coordination between casting, extraction, and post-casting processes, reducing scrap and rework. Moreover, lifecycle thinking and regulatory pressure have accelerated investments in energy-efficient drives and lubricants, which in turn influence layout and maintenance protocols. Taken together, these shifts are redefining procurement specifications, supplier relationships, and capital deployment strategies across foundries and OEM assembly lines.
Assessment of the cascading operational and procurement effects of United States tariff changes on die casting machine automation and supplier strategies
The introduction of United States tariffs in 2025 on selected metals and finished assemblies has introduced a new vector of commercial and operational consequences for die casting supply chains. In the immediate term, tariffs have increased landed costs for imported components and tooling, prompting buyers to re-evaluate sourcing strategies and to explore nearer-shore suppliers or qualify alternative alloy suppliers. Over time, these trade measures have incentivized several repercussions: suppliers are accelerating investment into domestic production capacity, engineering teams are redesigning parts for locally available alloys, and procurement cycles are incorporating tariff risk assessments as an integral part of supplier qualification.
As a result, capital allocation decisions are being made with a longer horizon, and firms are more frequently combining technology refreshes with localization projects to mitigate exposure. Moreover, the tariffs have catalyzed strategic collaboration between equipment manufacturers and end users to adapt machine designs for local supply constraints, including adjustments in gripper materials, sensor types, and cycle parameter ranges. Importantly, regulatory uncertainty continues to shape contracting strategies; firms are increasingly embedding clauses that address tariff pass-through, lead-time variability, and phased supply agreements to preserve production continuity while managing cost volatility.
Deep segmentation insights revealing how machine type, alloy use, end-use demands, clamping capacity, automation model, and sales channels drive procurement and engineering choices
Segmentation-driven analysis reveals differentiated adoption dynamics and engineering priorities across machine type, material, end-use industry, clamping force, automation model, and sales channel. When categorized by machine type into cold chamber and hot chamber platforms, cold chamber systems dominate heavy-configuration applications and are further classified by clamping capacity tiers of up to 1000 tonnes, 1000 to 2000 tonnes, and above 2000 tonnes; these tiers directly influence gripper design, cycle tolerance, and thermal management strategies. In terms of metal type, aluminum, magnesium, and zinc each impose distinct handling and cooling requirements, with aluminum components frequently associated with downstream applications such as automotive, consumer electronics, and industrial machinery, necessitating higher dimensional accuracy and surface-finish controls.
Examining end-use industries highlights that aerospace & defense, automotive, consumer electronics, and industrial machinery present divergent throughput expectations and quality regimes; within automotive, subsegments including commercial vehicles, electric vehicles, and passenger vehicles each prioritize different performance attributes, for instance corrosion resistance for commercial vehicles versus weight reduction and precision for electric vehicles. Clamping force segmentation reiterates the alignment between die size and pick-up system robustness, with up to 1000 tonnes suited to compact parts and above 2000 tonnes addressing large structural castings. Automation type separates fully automatic from semi-automatic deployments, and fully automatic solutions are further differentiated into integrated production line implementations versus standalone units, the former demanding deeper systems integration and synchronized control strategies. Finally, sales channel distinctions between direct sales and distributor sales affect service-level agreements, spare parts logistics, and customization lead times, influencing how OEMs and end users structure warranty and maintenance commitments. Taken together, these segmentation lenses enable suppliers and buyers to tailor specifications, prioritize capital investment, and structure post-sale support to align with application-critical requirements.
Regional differentiation in adoption, supply chain resilience, and technology prioritization across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics play a decisive role in technology adoption, supply chain architecture, and capital investment decisions across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, policy shifts, proximity to major automotive and heavy equipment OEMs, and a growing emphasis on reshoring and supplier diversification are accelerating investments in automated pick-up systems that offer rapid deployment and local serviceability. Consequently, manufacturers often prefer modular designs and vendor partnerships that can ensure short lead times and robust aftermarket support.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency around emissions and recycling, coupled with a dense network of precision engineering suppliers, encourages adoption of advanced automation and energy-efficient designs; integrators in this region frequently focus on retrofit solutions and interoperability with legacy control systems. In the Asia-Pacific region, high production volumes, rapid adoption of electric vehicles, and a well-developed supplier ecosystem create a fertile environment for both domestic system builders and international OEMs; investments here prioritize cost-optimized automation, scalable production lines, and rapid qualification cycles to serve large-scale manufacturing programs. These regional contrasts inform go-to-market strategies, service network planning, and R&D focus areas for suppliers seeking to expand globally.
Competitive landscape overview highlighting the strategic emphasis on integrated solutions, service offerings, and partnerships to secure long-term equipment relevance
Competitive behavior among key equipment and automation providers emphasizes integrated solutions, aftermarket services, and partnerships that bridge foundry engineering and systems integration. Leading firms are differentiating through investments in proprietary end-of-arm tooling, sensor fusion for real-time quality feedback, and modular control architectures that permit phased automation rollouts. In addition, companies are increasing focus on lifecycle services-preventive maintenance, spare parts pools, and remote diagnostics-to create recurring revenue streams and to reduce total cost of ownership for end users. Strategic collaborations with robotics manufacturers and software vendors are common, enabling suppliers to deliver coordinated solutions that synchronize casting cycles, extraction sequences, and secondary operations.
At the same time, smaller specialist suppliers continue to capture niche opportunities by offering highly customized grippers, heat-resistant tooling materials, and rapid retrofit kits tailored to legacy lines. These niche players often partner with system integrators to bridge functionality gaps for specific alloys or part geometries. As a result, procurement teams should evaluate vendors not only on immediate equipment capabilities but also on their service footprint, integration track record, and roadmaps for software and control-platform updates that will influence long-term compatibility and upgrade paths.
Actionable recommendations for equipment buyers and OEMs to align automation investments with product roadmaps, resilience planning, and sustainability goals
Leaders in die casting automation should adopt a multi-pronged approach to capture efficiency gains while managing risk and ensuring flexibility. First, align automation investments with product roadmaps so that equipment specifications account for anticipated changes in alloy selection, part geometry, and cycle times; this reduces the need for disruptive retrofits. Second, prioritize modular and upgradable control platforms that permit incremental automation investments and minimize capital disruption during scaling. Third, implement a supplier qualification process that weights not only price but also aftermarket capability, spare-parts logistics, and demonstrated integration success with vision and predictive-maintenance systems.
Fourth, develop a localized sourcing plan that balances cost competitiveness with tariff exposure and lead-time resilience, while fifth, invest in workforce upskilling to operate and maintain increasingly software-driven equipment. Sixth, embed sustainability metrics into procurement criteria, favoring drives and lubricants with lower energy footprints and suppliers with transparent recycling practices. Finally, establish cross-functional pilot programs that validate pick-up automation concepts on representative production lines prior to full-scale rollout, thereby accelerating learning cycles and de-risking capital deployment.
Transparent, triangulated research methodology integrating primary interviews, site validation, and documentary analysis to ensure robust and actionable findings
This research is built on a triangulated methodology combining primary qualitative engagement with industry stakeholders and rigorous secondary analysis of technical literature, standards, and policy developments. Primary workstreams included structured interviews with engineering leads at casting operations, procurement managers, and systems integrators, along with observational visits to representative production facilities to validate equipment performance under live cycle conditions. Secondary inputs comprised technical whitepapers, standards documentation, and publicly available regulatory notices relevant to metals trade and industrial automation. Data and insights were synthesized through iterative cross-validation between interview findings and documentary evidence to ensure consistency and to identify areas of divergent practice.
Analytical protocols emphasized traceability, with assumptions and data sources documented for each thematic area. The segmentation framework was applied consistently to classify equipment types, alloys, end uses, clamping capacities, automation modalities, and sales channels, enabling comparative analysis across use cases. Limitations include variability in proprietary process parameters across foundries and evolving tariff policies that may change the commercial environment; these were mitigated by scenario-based sensitivity reviews and by prioritizing recurring themes that emerged across multiple primary interviews.
Closing synthesis of how technology, materials, policy, and segmentation converge to determine strategic priorities for die casting pick-up automation
In conclusion, automatic pick-up systems for die casting operations are no longer peripheral assets but central enablers of productivity, quality, and safety improvements in modern foundries. The interplay of electrification, material evolution, and automation intelligence is redefining equipment specifications and supplier expectations. Trade policy shifts have introduced near-term sourcing challenges while simultaneously accelerating localization and collaborative engineering efforts between equipment manufacturers and end users. Segmentation analysis underscores that effective specification requires careful alignment between machine type, alloy properties, target industry requirements, clamping capacity, automation model, and sales channel dynamics.
Going forward, organizations that prioritize modularity, service-oriented vendor relationships, and workforce upskilling will be best positioned to convert technological capability into operational advantage. By integrating technical, commercial, and regulatory considerations into procurement and capital planning processes, stakeholders can achieve improved uptime, higher first-pass yields, and greater adaptability to evolving product and policy demands.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise introduction to automatic pick-up systems for die casting operations and how they integrate with modern production priorities and quality objectives
The die casting machine automatic pick-up machine represents a pivotal adjunct to modern high-pressure metal casting operations, combining mechanical precision with downstream automation to increase throughput, consistency, and operator safety. These systems are designed to extract, manipulate, and transfer freshly cast components from the die casting cell to secondary operations such as trimming, inspection, or finishing, thereby reducing manual handling and cycle variability. In an era defined by tighter tolerances, higher cadence production for electrification, and stricter environmental controls, automatic pick-up equipment has transitioned from optional extras to integral components of efficient casting lines.
Consequently, stakeholders across original equipment manufacturers, tier suppliers, and captive foundries are reevaluating line architecture and capital allocation to incorporate pick-up automation earlier in project lifecycles. As a result, engineering teams are balancing cycle-time objectives with tool life, molten-metal behavior, and downstream quality control needs. Importantly, this introduction sets the stage for the subsequent sections, which explore technological shifts, trade policy impacts, segmentation-based implications, and strategic recommendations that operators and investors must consider to remain competitive.
How electrification, lightweight alloys, digital automation, and sustainability imperatives are reshaping pick-up automation requirements and procurement strategies
Over recent years, the landscape for die casting automation has experienced transformative shifts driven by four converging forces: rapid adoption of electric vehicle platforms, accelerated emphasis on lightweight alloys, the maturation of industrial automation technologies, and increasing scrutiny on sustainability. Electrification of drivetrains has pushed demand for components that require more complex geometries and higher dimensional precision, prompting integrators to specify pick-up systems that maintain repeatable part orientation and minimize thermal shock during transfer.
Simultaneously, the transition toward aluminum and magnesium alloys for weight reduction has imposed new mechanical and thermal constraints on pick-up grippers, sensors, and cycle timing. In parallel, industrial automation advances-particularly the integration of machine vision, predictive maintenance analytics, and robotic end-of-arm tooling-have enabled tighter coordination between casting, extraction, and post-casting processes, reducing scrap and rework. Moreover, lifecycle thinking and regulatory pressure have accelerated investments in energy-efficient drives and lubricants, which in turn influence layout and maintenance protocols. Taken together, these shifts are redefining procurement specifications, supplier relationships, and capital deployment strategies across foundries and OEM assembly lines.
Assessment of the cascading operational and procurement effects of United States tariff changes on die casting machine automation and supplier strategies
The introduction of United States tariffs in 2025 on selected metals and finished assemblies has introduced a new vector of commercial and operational consequences for die casting supply chains. In the immediate term, tariffs have increased landed costs for imported components and tooling, prompting buyers to re-evaluate sourcing strategies and to explore nearer-shore suppliers or qualify alternative alloy suppliers. Over time, these trade measures have incentivized several repercussions: suppliers are accelerating investment into domestic production capacity, engineering teams are redesigning parts for locally available alloys, and procurement cycles are incorporating tariff risk assessments as an integral part of supplier qualification.
As a result, capital allocation decisions are being made with a longer horizon, and firms are more frequently combining technology refreshes with localization projects to mitigate exposure. Moreover, the tariffs have catalyzed strategic collaboration between equipment manufacturers and end users to adapt machine designs for local supply constraints, including adjustments in gripper materials, sensor types, and cycle parameter ranges. Importantly, regulatory uncertainty continues to shape contracting strategies; firms are increasingly embedding clauses that address tariff pass-through, lead-time variability, and phased supply agreements to preserve production continuity while managing cost volatility.
Deep segmentation insights revealing how machine type, alloy use, end-use demands, clamping capacity, automation model, and sales channels drive procurement and engineering choices
Segmentation-driven analysis reveals differentiated adoption dynamics and engineering priorities across machine type, material, end-use industry, clamping force, automation model, and sales channel. When categorized by machine type into cold chamber and hot chamber platforms, cold chamber systems dominate heavy-configuration applications and are further classified by clamping capacity tiers of up to 1000 tonnes, 1000 to 2000 tonnes, and above 2000 tonnes; these tiers directly influence gripper design, cycle tolerance, and thermal management strategies. In terms of metal type, aluminum, magnesium, and zinc each impose distinct handling and cooling requirements, with aluminum components frequently associated with downstream applications such as automotive, consumer electronics, and industrial machinery, necessitating higher dimensional accuracy and surface-finish controls.
Examining end-use industries highlights that aerospace & defense, automotive, consumer electronics, and industrial machinery present divergent throughput expectations and quality regimes; within automotive, subsegments including commercial vehicles, electric vehicles, and passenger vehicles each prioritize different performance attributes, for instance corrosion resistance for commercial vehicles versus weight reduction and precision for electric vehicles. Clamping force segmentation reiterates the alignment between die size and pick-up system robustness, with up to 1000 tonnes suited to compact parts and above 2000 tonnes addressing large structural castings. Automation type separates fully automatic from semi-automatic deployments, and fully automatic solutions are further differentiated into integrated production line implementations versus standalone units, the former demanding deeper systems integration and synchronized control strategies. Finally, sales channel distinctions between direct sales and distributor sales affect service-level agreements, spare parts logistics, and customization lead times, influencing how OEMs and end users structure warranty and maintenance commitments. Taken together, these segmentation lenses enable suppliers and buyers to tailor specifications, prioritize capital investment, and structure post-sale support to align with application-critical requirements.
Regional differentiation in adoption, supply chain resilience, and technology prioritization across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics play a decisive role in technology adoption, supply chain architecture, and capital investment decisions across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, policy shifts, proximity to major automotive and heavy equipment OEMs, and a growing emphasis on reshoring and supplier diversification are accelerating investments in automated pick-up systems that offer rapid deployment and local serviceability. Consequently, manufacturers often prefer modular designs and vendor partnerships that can ensure short lead times and robust aftermarket support.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency around emissions and recycling, coupled with a dense network of precision engineering suppliers, encourages adoption of advanced automation and energy-efficient designs; integrators in this region frequently focus on retrofit solutions and interoperability with legacy control systems. In the Asia-Pacific region, high production volumes, rapid adoption of electric vehicles, and a well-developed supplier ecosystem create a fertile environment for both domestic system builders and international OEMs; investments here prioritize cost-optimized automation, scalable production lines, and rapid qualification cycles to serve large-scale manufacturing programs. These regional contrasts inform go-to-market strategies, service network planning, and R&D focus areas for suppliers seeking to expand globally.
Competitive landscape overview highlighting the strategic emphasis on integrated solutions, service offerings, and partnerships to secure long-term equipment relevance
Competitive behavior among key equipment and automation providers emphasizes integrated solutions, aftermarket services, and partnerships that bridge foundry engineering and systems integration. Leading firms are differentiating through investments in proprietary end-of-arm tooling, sensor fusion for real-time quality feedback, and modular control architectures that permit phased automation rollouts. In addition, companies are increasing focus on lifecycle services-preventive maintenance, spare parts pools, and remote diagnostics-to create recurring revenue streams and to reduce total cost of ownership for end users. Strategic collaborations with robotics manufacturers and software vendors are common, enabling suppliers to deliver coordinated solutions that synchronize casting cycles, extraction sequences, and secondary operations.
At the same time, smaller specialist suppliers continue to capture niche opportunities by offering highly customized grippers, heat-resistant tooling materials, and rapid retrofit kits tailored to legacy lines. These niche players often partner with system integrators to bridge functionality gaps for specific alloys or part geometries. As a result, procurement teams should evaluate vendors not only on immediate equipment capabilities but also on their service footprint, integration track record, and roadmaps for software and control-platform updates that will influence long-term compatibility and upgrade paths.
Actionable recommendations for equipment buyers and OEMs to align automation investments with product roadmaps, resilience planning, and sustainability goals
Leaders in die casting automation should adopt a multi-pronged approach to capture efficiency gains while managing risk and ensuring flexibility. First, align automation investments with product roadmaps so that equipment specifications account for anticipated changes in alloy selection, part geometry, and cycle times; this reduces the need for disruptive retrofits. Second, prioritize modular and upgradable control platforms that permit incremental automation investments and minimize capital disruption during scaling. Third, implement a supplier qualification process that weights not only price but also aftermarket capability, spare-parts logistics, and demonstrated integration success with vision and predictive-maintenance systems.
Fourth, develop a localized sourcing plan that balances cost competitiveness with tariff exposure and lead-time resilience, while fifth, invest in workforce upskilling to operate and maintain increasingly software-driven equipment. Sixth, embed sustainability metrics into procurement criteria, favoring drives and lubricants with lower energy footprints and suppliers with transparent recycling practices. Finally, establish cross-functional pilot programs that validate pick-up automation concepts on representative production lines prior to full-scale rollout, thereby accelerating learning cycles and de-risking capital deployment.
Transparent, triangulated research methodology integrating primary interviews, site validation, and documentary analysis to ensure robust and actionable findings
This research is built on a triangulated methodology combining primary qualitative engagement with industry stakeholders and rigorous secondary analysis of technical literature, standards, and policy developments. Primary workstreams included structured interviews with engineering leads at casting operations, procurement managers, and systems integrators, along with observational visits to representative production facilities to validate equipment performance under live cycle conditions. Secondary inputs comprised technical whitepapers, standards documentation, and publicly available regulatory notices relevant to metals trade and industrial automation. Data and insights were synthesized through iterative cross-validation between interview findings and documentary evidence to ensure consistency and to identify areas of divergent practice.
Analytical protocols emphasized traceability, with assumptions and data sources documented for each thematic area. The segmentation framework was applied consistently to classify equipment types, alloys, end uses, clamping capacities, automation modalities, and sales channels, enabling comparative analysis across use cases. Limitations include variability in proprietary process parameters across foundries and evolving tariff policies that may change the commercial environment; these were mitigated by scenario-based sensitivity reviews and by prioritizing recurring themes that emerged across multiple primary interviews.
Closing synthesis of how technology, materials, policy, and segmentation converge to determine strategic priorities for die casting pick-up automation
In conclusion, automatic pick-up systems for die casting operations are no longer peripheral assets but central enablers of productivity, quality, and safety improvements in modern foundries. The interplay of electrification, material evolution, and automation intelligence is redefining equipment specifications and supplier expectations. Trade policy shifts have introduced near-term sourcing challenges while simultaneously accelerating localization and collaborative engineering efforts between equipment manufacturers and end users. Segmentation analysis underscores that effective specification requires careful alignment between machine type, alloy properties, target industry requirements, clamping capacity, automation model, and sales channel dynamics.
Going forward, organizations that prioritize modularity, service-oriented vendor relationships, and workforce upskilling will be best positioned to convert technological capability into operational advantage. By integrating technical, commercial, and regulatory considerations into procurement and capital planning processes, stakeholders can achieve improved uptime, higher first-pass yields, and greater adaptability to evolving product and policy demands.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market, by Machine Type
- 8.1. Cold Chamber
- 8.1.1. 1000 To 2000 T
- 8.1.2. Above 2000 T
- 8.1.3. Up To 1000 T
- 8.2. Hot Chamber
- 9. Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market, by Metal Type
- 9.1. Aluminum
- 9.1.1. Automotive
- 9.1.2. Consumer Electronics
- 9.1.3. Industrial Machinery
- 9.2. Magnesium
- 9.3. Zinc
- 10. Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market, by Clamping Force
- 10.1. 1000 To 2000 T
- 10.2. Above 2000 T
- 10.3. Up To 1000 T
- 11. Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market, by Automation Type
- 11.1. Fully Automatic
- 11.1.1. Integrated Production Line
- 11.1.2. Standalone
- 11.2. Semi Automatic
- 12. Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market, by End Use Industry
- 12.1. Aerospace & Defense
- 12.2. Automotive
- 12.2.1. Commercial Vehicle
- 12.2.2. Electric Vehicle
- 12.2.3. Passenger Vehicle
- 12.3. Consumer Electronics
- 12.4. Industrial Machinery
- 13. Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market, by Sales Channel
- 13.1. Direct Sales
- 13.2. Distributor Sales
- 14. Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. United States Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market
- 18. China Die Casting Machine Automatic Pick-Up Machine Market
- 19. Competitive Landscape
- 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 19.5. AIDA Engineering, Ltd.
- 19.6. Altaïr Engineering, Inc.
- 19.7. Bühler AG
- 19.8. Dandong Fengtai Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
- 19.9. Dynacast International Inc.
- 19.10. Frech France S.A.S.
- 19.11. Fried. Frech GmbH & Co. KG
- 19.12. Fushun Die Casting Machinery Co., Ltd.
- 19.13. Haitian Metal Machinery South Co., Ltd.
- 19.14. Hangzhou Fuling Precision Die Casting Co., Ltd.
- 19.15. Hangzhou Mingming Casting & Mould Machinery Co., Ltd.
- 19.16. Inductotherm Group, Inc.
- 19.17. Italpresse Gauss S.p.A.
- 19.18. Nissei Plastic Industrial Co., Ltd.
- 19.19. Shibaura Machine Co., Ltd.
- 19.20. Sinto Corporation
- 19.21. Taiwan Shin Yung Machinery Co., Ltd.
- 19.22. Toshiba Machine Co., Ltd.
- 19.23. UBE Machinery Corporation, Ltd.
- 19.24. Wuko Machinery Co., Ltd.
- 19.25. Yieh Machinery & Mould Industrial Co., Ltd.
- 19.26. Yizumi Die Casting Machinery (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
- 19.27. Yizumi Precision Machinery (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.
- 19.28. Zhejiang Aokai Mechanical & Electrical Technology Co., Ltd.
- 19.29. Zhejiang Taizhou Taihua Pressure Machine Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
