Dichloroethane Market by Process (Direct Chlorination, Oxychlorination), Application (Chemical Intermediates, Polyvinyl Chloride Production, Solvents), End Use Industry, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Dichloroethane Market was valued at USD 26.47 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 27.68 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 4.87%, reaching USD 38.73 billion by 2032.
Harnessing dichloroethane market realities with a concise introduction to chemical properties, logistics, regulatory drivers and application linkages
Dichloroethane occupies a pivotal role in contemporary chemical manufacturing and downstream polymer production, acting as both an intermediate and a solvent in a range of industrial processes. Its physicochemical properties, production pathways and interfacing with polyvinyl chloride feedstock chains create a set of operational and commercial dynamics that merit focused attention from procurement, engineering and regulatory teams. In recent years, shifts in feedstock availability, energy pricing and emissions scrutiny have intensified scrutiny on how dichloroethane is produced, transported and used, and organizations must reconcile short-term operational needs with mid-term strategic resilience.
This introduction frames dichloroethane within the broader context of supply chain complexity, decarbonization pressures and evolving regulatory landscapes. It emphasizes practical linkages between production routes and downstream application suitability, highlights the importance of integrated logistics and storage management, and sets the stage for deeper examinations of segmentation, regional variation and corporate responses. Readers should expect an evidence-driven orientation that underscores actionable considerations for operations, compliance and commercial planning while clarifying the key levers that influence cost, continuity and sustainability outcomes.
Mapping transformative shifts in production, feedstock sourcing, sustainability adoption and technology integration that redefine dichloroethane value chains
The landscape for dichloroethane is undergoing transformative shifts driven by both structural and tactical forces. On the supply side, feedstock transitions and diversification strategies are prompting producers to reassess process routes and raw material sourcing, while technological advances in oxychlorination and direct chlorination are altering unit economics and environmental footprints. Concurrently, the push for lower-carbon operations and improved environmental performance is elevating the importance of process optimization, emissions controls and byproduct management, thereby influencing capital allocation and retrofit priorities.
Demand-side dynamics are also in flux as downstream industries recalibrate material specifications and sustainability criteria. Scaling demands in targeted end use sectors are intersecting with tightening regulatory requirements, producing new compliance burdens and incentives for product stewardship. Logistics and trade patterns have adapted accordingly, prompting shifts in regional trade flows, inventory strategies and distributor relationships. Taken together, these changes are not incremental; they represent a shift in how stakeholders evaluate risk, invest in capacity and align product portfolios to longer-term sustainability and resilience objectives.
Assessing the cumulative impact of United States tariffs implemented in 2025 on supply chains, procurement strategies and downstream production
The introduction of United States tariffs in 2025 has had a cascading effect across procurement strategies, supplier relationships and logistical planning for players connected to dichloroethane supply chains. Import duties elevated the landed cost of certain feedstocks and intermediate shipments, prompting buyers to re-evaluate sourcing geographies and to intensify negotiations with domestic and alternative suppliers. In response, some companies accelerated localization efforts, seeking longer-term contracts with regional producers to mitigate tariff exposure and reduce transport-related vulnerabilities.
Operational teams adapted by increasing emphasis on inventory management and safety stock policies to buffer against tariff-induced supply disruptions. Procurement strategies shifted from purely price-focused decision-making to a more nuanced assessment that accounts for tariff risk, transportation reliability and regulatory compliance costs. Downstream manufacturers revised lead times and supplier qualification criteria while legal and trade teams expanded engagement with customs authorities and trade consultants to identify mitigation pathways such as tariff classification reviews, origin claims and potential use of bonded logistics arrangements. Collectively, these adaptations illustrate how trade policy changes propagate through complex chemical value chains, influencing both immediate procurement responses and medium-term strategic positioning.
Uncovering actionable segmentation insights across applications, industries, process pathways and distribution channels to guide dichloroethane strategies
A clear understanding of segmentation is essential to align product strategy with operational capabilities and customer expectations. Based on application, the market encompasses Chemical Intermediates, Polyvinyl Chloride Production and Solvents, with polyvinyl chloride production further subdivided into Flexible Polyvinyl Chloride and Rigid Polyvinyl Chloride; the flexible segment is closely tied to applications such as cables and wires and footwear and fashion goods, while the rigid segment supports films and plates, pipes and fittings, and profiles and sheets. These application distinctions inform quality specifications, impurity tolerances and supply reliability requirements, and they also affect priorities for emissions control and processing compatibility.
Based on end use industry, the market is influenced by demand from automotive, construction, consumer goods, electrical and electronics, and packaging sectors, each of which imposes different performance criteria and regulatory constraints. Based on process, production pathways are categorized into direct chlorination and oxychlorination, with each route presenting distinct raw material needs, byproduct profiles and environmental considerations that shape plant operations and capital intensity. Based on distribution channel, commercial approaches vary between direct sales and distributors, influencing lead times, contract structures and customer support models. When these segmentation dimensions are overlaid, they reveal nuanced commercial windows and operational trade-offs that companies must navigate to align portfolio decisions with customer requirements and regulatory compliance obligations.
Region-focused analysis of regulatory regimes, feedstock dynamics, demand signals and logistics across Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics materially affect access to feedstock, regulatory compliance burdens, logistics complexity and customer demand patterns. In the Americas, proximity to key petrochemical clusters and port infrastructure often provides advantages in feedstock access and export capability, yet regional regulatory frameworks and state-level environmental standards can introduce variability in permitting timelines and operating requirements. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape where advanced regulatory regimes coexist with jurisdictions prioritizing industrial growth; this mix influences investment decisions, cross-border trade flows and the relative attractiveness of regional production hubs. Asia-Pacific is distinguished by its manufacturing scale, rapidly evolving environmental policies, and varying infrastructural maturity, which together drive divergent strategies among producers and consumers seeking cost efficiency and regulatory alignment.
Across these regions, logistical considerations such as port capacity, inland transportation networks and storage infrastructure shape inventory strategies and distribution economics. Additionally, the pace of regulatory change, the stringency of emissions and chemical use rules, and the availability of skilled technical labor differ meaningfully across geographies, informing choices about where to invest in new capacity versus where to pursue contractual sourcing arrangements. Understanding these regional contours is vital for companies designing resilient supply networks, negotiating long-term procurement, and planning capital deployment in line with both compliance obligations and commercial opportunity.
Profiling dichloroethane producers and value chain partners with focus on investments, capacity management, sustainability and commercial agility
Company strategies vary along several dimensions including investment cadence, process route preference, sustainability commitments and commercial channel configuration. Leading producers tend to prioritize a balanced approach that combines capacity management with investments in emissions control and process yield improvements. Strategic capital allocation increasingly favors retrofits and technology upgrades that reduce environmental impact while preserving or improving operational efficiency, and firms with diversified feedstock portfolios are generally better positioned to manage volatility in raw material supply and pricing.
Partnerships and off-take agreements remain central to risk management, with many companies deepening relationships across the value chain to secure feedstock and to provide downstream certainty. Commercial models also differ, with some organizations emphasizing direct sales to large industrial consumers while others rely on distribution networks to reach fragmented end markets. Sustainability credentials and traceability are emerging as competitive differentiators, prompting investments in monitoring, reporting and supplier engagement. These combined corporate choices shape competitive positioning and determine who can rapidly adapt to regulatory change, trade measures and evolving customer expectations.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to optimize sourcing, accelerate decarbonization, strengthen compliance and integrate downstream to stay competitive
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic set of priorities that align short-term operational resilience with mid-term strategic transformation. First, procurement teams should diversify sourcing by qualifying alternative feedstock suppliers and by establishing flexible contracting terms that accommodate tariff and trade volatility. Second, operations should prioritize process improvements and retrofits that lower emissions and improve yields, directing capital to projects with clear payback through cost avoidance and compliance risk reduction. Third, corporate functions should enhance trade and regulatory expertise to proactively manage tariff exposure and to pursue lawful mitigation measures, thereby reducing unexpected cost escalation and delivery interruptions.
Leaders should also accelerate engagement with downstream customers to co-develop product specifications that balance performance with environmental and cost considerations. Investing in supplier transparency and traceability will strengthen commercial relationships and reduce compliance risk. Finally, senior management should integrate scenario-based planning into strategic reviews to evaluate alternative supply configurations, regulatory trajectories and technology adoption pathways, ensuring investment decisions are resilient to plausible shifts in policy, feedstock availability and end market demands.
Research methodology describing sources, validation, interviews and analytical techniques with clear protocols and data governance for dichloroethane insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines primary engagement with industry participants, structured interviews with technical and commercial stakeholders, and systematic review of public technical literature and regulatory documents to validate findings. Data collection prioritized direct conversations with plant operations, procurement leaders and compliance specialists to capture real-world operational constraints and the practical implications of process route choices. Secondary sources were used to corroborate technical details, emissions considerations and trade policy changes, and to ensure a comprehensive perspective across production, distribution and end use contexts.
Analytical techniques included cross-sectional process comparison, risk mapping of supply chain exposures, and qualitative scenario analysis to illuminate potential operational responses to regulatory and trade perturbations. Validation protocols incorporated triangulation across independent data points and peer review by subject matter experts to strengthen interpretive confidence. This multi-method approach yields robust, actionable insights while maintaining transparency about assumptions and data provenance so stakeholders can adapt the findings to their specific organizational contexts.
Conclusive perspectives synthesizing operational, regulatory and strategic considerations to guide stakeholders through the evolving dichloroethane landscape
In conclusion, the dichloroethane landscape is defined by interconnected operational, regulatory and commercial forces that require coordinated responses across procurement, operations and corporate strategy. Supply chain resilience now depends not only on cost competitiveness but also on the ability to manage tariff exposure, regulatory compliance and environmental performance. Production pathways and process choices have direct implications for emissions profiles and byproduct management, which in turn influence permitting, community relations and long-term viability.
Stakeholders should therefore pursue integrated strategies that encompass diversified sourcing, targeted process investments and proactive regulatory engagement. Cross-functional collaboration and scenario-driven planning are essential to navigate trade policy changes, regional regulatory heterogeneity and evolving end market requirements. By aligning short-term operational adjustments with medium-term sustainability and strategic objectives, organizations can strengthen their market position and reduce exposure to material disruptions while responding to customer and regulator expectations.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Harnessing dichloroethane market realities with a concise introduction to chemical properties, logistics, regulatory drivers and application linkages
Dichloroethane occupies a pivotal role in contemporary chemical manufacturing and downstream polymer production, acting as both an intermediate and a solvent in a range of industrial processes. Its physicochemical properties, production pathways and interfacing with polyvinyl chloride feedstock chains create a set of operational and commercial dynamics that merit focused attention from procurement, engineering and regulatory teams. In recent years, shifts in feedstock availability, energy pricing and emissions scrutiny have intensified scrutiny on how dichloroethane is produced, transported and used, and organizations must reconcile short-term operational needs with mid-term strategic resilience.
This introduction frames dichloroethane within the broader context of supply chain complexity, decarbonization pressures and evolving regulatory landscapes. It emphasizes practical linkages between production routes and downstream application suitability, highlights the importance of integrated logistics and storage management, and sets the stage for deeper examinations of segmentation, regional variation and corporate responses. Readers should expect an evidence-driven orientation that underscores actionable considerations for operations, compliance and commercial planning while clarifying the key levers that influence cost, continuity and sustainability outcomes.
Mapping transformative shifts in production, feedstock sourcing, sustainability adoption and technology integration that redefine dichloroethane value chains
The landscape for dichloroethane is undergoing transformative shifts driven by both structural and tactical forces. On the supply side, feedstock transitions and diversification strategies are prompting producers to reassess process routes and raw material sourcing, while technological advances in oxychlorination and direct chlorination are altering unit economics and environmental footprints. Concurrently, the push for lower-carbon operations and improved environmental performance is elevating the importance of process optimization, emissions controls and byproduct management, thereby influencing capital allocation and retrofit priorities.
Demand-side dynamics are also in flux as downstream industries recalibrate material specifications and sustainability criteria. Scaling demands in targeted end use sectors are intersecting with tightening regulatory requirements, producing new compliance burdens and incentives for product stewardship. Logistics and trade patterns have adapted accordingly, prompting shifts in regional trade flows, inventory strategies and distributor relationships. Taken together, these changes are not incremental; they represent a shift in how stakeholders evaluate risk, invest in capacity and align product portfolios to longer-term sustainability and resilience objectives.
Assessing the cumulative impact of United States tariffs implemented in 2025 on supply chains, procurement strategies and downstream production
The introduction of United States tariffs in 2025 has had a cascading effect across procurement strategies, supplier relationships and logistical planning for players connected to dichloroethane supply chains. Import duties elevated the landed cost of certain feedstocks and intermediate shipments, prompting buyers to re-evaluate sourcing geographies and to intensify negotiations with domestic and alternative suppliers. In response, some companies accelerated localization efforts, seeking longer-term contracts with regional producers to mitigate tariff exposure and reduce transport-related vulnerabilities.
Operational teams adapted by increasing emphasis on inventory management and safety stock policies to buffer against tariff-induced supply disruptions. Procurement strategies shifted from purely price-focused decision-making to a more nuanced assessment that accounts for tariff risk, transportation reliability and regulatory compliance costs. Downstream manufacturers revised lead times and supplier qualification criteria while legal and trade teams expanded engagement with customs authorities and trade consultants to identify mitigation pathways such as tariff classification reviews, origin claims and potential use of bonded logistics arrangements. Collectively, these adaptations illustrate how trade policy changes propagate through complex chemical value chains, influencing both immediate procurement responses and medium-term strategic positioning.
Uncovering actionable segmentation insights across applications, industries, process pathways and distribution channels to guide dichloroethane strategies
A clear understanding of segmentation is essential to align product strategy with operational capabilities and customer expectations. Based on application, the market encompasses Chemical Intermediates, Polyvinyl Chloride Production and Solvents, with polyvinyl chloride production further subdivided into Flexible Polyvinyl Chloride and Rigid Polyvinyl Chloride; the flexible segment is closely tied to applications such as cables and wires and footwear and fashion goods, while the rigid segment supports films and plates, pipes and fittings, and profiles and sheets. These application distinctions inform quality specifications, impurity tolerances and supply reliability requirements, and they also affect priorities for emissions control and processing compatibility.
Based on end use industry, the market is influenced by demand from automotive, construction, consumer goods, electrical and electronics, and packaging sectors, each of which imposes different performance criteria and regulatory constraints. Based on process, production pathways are categorized into direct chlorination and oxychlorination, with each route presenting distinct raw material needs, byproduct profiles and environmental considerations that shape plant operations and capital intensity. Based on distribution channel, commercial approaches vary between direct sales and distributors, influencing lead times, contract structures and customer support models. When these segmentation dimensions are overlaid, they reveal nuanced commercial windows and operational trade-offs that companies must navigate to align portfolio decisions with customer requirements and regulatory compliance obligations.
Region-focused analysis of regulatory regimes, feedstock dynamics, demand signals and logistics across Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics materially affect access to feedstock, regulatory compliance burdens, logistics complexity and customer demand patterns. In the Americas, proximity to key petrochemical clusters and port infrastructure often provides advantages in feedstock access and export capability, yet regional regulatory frameworks and state-level environmental standards can introduce variability in permitting timelines and operating requirements. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape where advanced regulatory regimes coexist with jurisdictions prioritizing industrial growth; this mix influences investment decisions, cross-border trade flows and the relative attractiveness of regional production hubs. Asia-Pacific is distinguished by its manufacturing scale, rapidly evolving environmental policies, and varying infrastructural maturity, which together drive divergent strategies among producers and consumers seeking cost efficiency and regulatory alignment.
Across these regions, logistical considerations such as port capacity, inland transportation networks and storage infrastructure shape inventory strategies and distribution economics. Additionally, the pace of regulatory change, the stringency of emissions and chemical use rules, and the availability of skilled technical labor differ meaningfully across geographies, informing choices about where to invest in new capacity versus where to pursue contractual sourcing arrangements. Understanding these regional contours is vital for companies designing resilient supply networks, negotiating long-term procurement, and planning capital deployment in line with both compliance obligations and commercial opportunity.
Profiling dichloroethane producers and value chain partners with focus on investments, capacity management, sustainability and commercial agility
Company strategies vary along several dimensions including investment cadence, process route preference, sustainability commitments and commercial channel configuration. Leading producers tend to prioritize a balanced approach that combines capacity management with investments in emissions control and process yield improvements. Strategic capital allocation increasingly favors retrofits and technology upgrades that reduce environmental impact while preserving or improving operational efficiency, and firms with diversified feedstock portfolios are generally better positioned to manage volatility in raw material supply and pricing.
Partnerships and off-take agreements remain central to risk management, with many companies deepening relationships across the value chain to secure feedstock and to provide downstream certainty. Commercial models also differ, with some organizations emphasizing direct sales to large industrial consumers while others rely on distribution networks to reach fragmented end markets. Sustainability credentials and traceability are emerging as competitive differentiators, prompting investments in monitoring, reporting and supplier engagement. These combined corporate choices shape competitive positioning and determine who can rapidly adapt to regulatory change, trade measures and evolving customer expectations.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to optimize sourcing, accelerate decarbonization, strengthen compliance and integrate downstream to stay competitive
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic set of priorities that align short-term operational resilience with mid-term strategic transformation. First, procurement teams should diversify sourcing by qualifying alternative feedstock suppliers and by establishing flexible contracting terms that accommodate tariff and trade volatility. Second, operations should prioritize process improvements and retrofits that lower emissions and improve yields, directing capital to projects with clear payback through cost avoidance and compliance risk reduction. Third, corporate functions should enhance trade and regulatory expertise to proactively manage tariff exposure and to pursue lawful mitigation measures, thereby reducing unexpected cost escalation and delivery interruptions.
Leaders should also accelerate engagement with downstream customers to co-develop product specifications that balance performance with environmental and cost considerations. Investing in supplier transparency and traceability will strengthen commercial relationships and reduce compliance risk. Finally, senior management should integrate scenario-based planning into strategic reviews to evaluate alternative supply configurations, regulatory trajectories and technology adoption pathways, ensuring investment decisions are resilient to plausible shifts in policy, feedstock availability and end market demands.
Research methodology describing sources, validation, interviews and analytical techniques with clear protocols and data governance for dichloroethane insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines primary engagement with industry participants, structured interviews with technical and commercial stakeholders, and systematic review of public technical literature and regulatory documents to validate findings. Data collection prioritized direct conversations with plant operations, procurement leaders and compliance specialists to capture real-world operational constraints and the practical implications of process route choices. Secondary sources were used to corroborate technical details, emissions considerations and trade policy changes, and to ensure a comprehensive perspective across production, distribution and end use contexts.
Analytical techniques included cross-sectional process comparison, risk mapping of supply chain exposures, and qualitative scenario analysis to illuminate potential operational responses to regulatory and trade perturbations. Validation protocols incorporated triangulation across independent data points and peer review by subject matter experts to strengthen interpretive confidence. This multi-method approach yields robust, actionable insights while maintaining transparency about assumptions and data provenance so stakeholders can adapt the findings to their specific organizational contexts.
Conclusive perspectives synthesizing operational, regulatory and strategic considerations to guide stakeholders through the evolving dichloroethane landscape
In conclusion, the dichloroethane landscape is defined by interconnected operational, regulatory and commercial forces that require coordinated responses across procurement, operations and corporate strategy. Supply chain resilience now depends not only on cost competitiveness but also on the ability to manage tariff exposure, regulatory compliance and environmental performance. Production pathways and process choices have direct implications for emissions profiles and byproduct management, which in turn influence permitting, community relations and long-term viability.
Stakeholders should therefore pursue integrated strategies that encompass diversified sourcing, targeted process investments and proactive regulatory engagement. Cross-functional collaboration and scenario-driven planning are essential to navigate trade policy changes, regional regulatory heterogeneity and evolving end market requirements. By aligning short-term operational adjustments with medium-term sustainability and strategic objectives, organizations can strengthen their market position and reduce exposure to material disruptions while responding to customer and regulator expectations.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
193 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rapid expansion of PVC manufacturing capacity in Asia Pacific driving dichloroethane demand growth
- 5.2. Regulatory pressure from environmental agencies driving investment in low emission dichloroethane production technologies
- 5.3. Volatility in ethylene and chlorine feedstock prices escalating operational risks for dichloroethane producers
- 5.4. Rising adoption of green hydrogen and renewable energy integration in dichloroethane synthesis processes
- 5.5. Emergence of circular economy models promoting dichloroethane recycling and waste minimization strategies
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Dichloroethane Market, by Process
- 8.1. Direct Chlorination
- 8.2. Oxychlorination
- 9. Dichloroethane Market, by Application
- 9.1. Chemical Intermediates
- 9.2. Polyvinyl Chloride Production
- 9.2.1. Flexible Polyvinyl Chloride
- 9.2.1.1. Cables & Wires
- 9.2.1.2. Footwear & Fashion Goods
- 9.2.2. Rigid Polyvinyl Chloride
- 9.2.2.1. Films & Plates
- 9.2.2.2. Pipes & Fittings
- 9.2.2.3. Profiles & Sheets
- 9.3. Solvents
- 10. Dichloroethane Market, by End Use Industry
- 10.1. Automotive
- 10.2. Construction
- 10.3. Consumer Goods
- 10.4. Electrical & Electronics
- 10.5. Packaging
- 11. Dichloroethane Market, by Distribution Channel
- 11.1. Direct Sales
- 11.2. Distributors
- 12. Dichloroethane Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Dichloroethane Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Dichloroethane Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. BASF SE
- 15.3.2. Bayer AG
- 15.3.3. BeanTown Chemical
- 15.3.4. Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG
- 15.3.5. Central Drug House (P) Ltd.
- 15.3.6. Eastman Chemical Company
- 15.3.7. Ereztech LLC
- 15.3.8. Formosa Plastics Corporation
- 15.3.9. Hwatsi Chemical Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.10. INEOS Group Limited
- 15.3.11. Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.
- 15.3.12. Kishida Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.13. LG Chemicals
- 15.3.14. Merck KGaA
- 15.3.15. Mitsui Toatsu Chemicals Inc.
- 15.3.16. Nacalai Tesque Inc.
- 15.3.17. Occidental Chemical Corporation
- 15.3.18. Olin Corporation
- 15.3.19. Orbia Advance Corporation S.A.B. de C.V.
- 15.3.20. Otto Chemie Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.21. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- 15.3.22. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.23. Shiv Chemicals
- 15.3.24. Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.
- 15.3.25. Solvay S.A.
- 15.3.26. Spectrum Chemical Mfg. Corp.
- 15.3.27. The Dow Chemical Company
- 15.3.28. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- 15.3.29. Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.30. Westlake Chemical Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
