Device-as-a-Service Market by Device Type (Computing Devices, Mobile Devices, Peripheral Devices), Offering (Hardware, Software, Services), Business Model, Organization Size, End User Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Device-as-a-Service Market was valued at USD 82.84 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 106.68 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 30.48%, reaching USD 696.31 billion by 2032.
A strategic orientation that explains why Device-as-a-Service is now central to enterprise procurement, operational resilience, workforce enablement, and sustainability agendas
The Device-as-a-Service model has evolved from a peripheral procurement option into a strategic vehicle for organizations seeking predictable costs, simplified device lifecycle management, and stronger alignment between technology and business outcomes. As organizations continue to prioritize employee experience, security posture, and sustainability, DaaS offers a coherent means to consolidate hardware, software, and managed services under a single subscription framework. This introduction situates the reader at the intersection of operational necessity and commercial innovation, where DaaS becomes both a cost-management tool and a platform for digital workplace transformation.
Transitioning to DaaS requires a synthesis of procurement discipline, vendor governance, and internal change management. Procurement teams must reconcile short-term budgetary constraints with the long-term benefits of device standardization, predictable refresh cycles, and integrated support services. Meanwhile, IT and security leaders must embed endpoint lifecycle practices within broader enterprise risk frameworks to ensure compliance with evolving data protection and device management standards. Together, these dynamics frame DaaS as a cross-functional initiative that extends well beyond hardware provisioning.
Finally, this report adopts a pragmatic lens: it highlights operational levers that enterprises can use to maximize device uptime, streamline support channels, and advance sustainability goals, while also recognizing the commercial shifts suppliers must undertake to deliver consistent, scalable service outcomes.
How consumption economics, security mandates, sustainability expectations, and evolving work models are reshaping Device-as-a-Service value chains and contractual dynamics
The landscape for provisioning endpoints and workspace technology is undergoing several transformative shifts that reconfigure value creation for both buyers and suppliers. First, consumption models are migrating from capital expenditure toward service-based procurement, which reshapes vendor incentives and obligates providers to extend outcomes-based guarantees. This shift promotes closer alignment between device performance and service-level commitments, which in turn elevates the importance of analytics, remote support, and predictive maintenance.
Concurrently, cybersecurity and zero trust architectures have escalated the strategic utility of centrally managed endpoints. As a result, security tooling, firmware management, and secure provisioning increasingly converge with device leasing, making security a differentiator rather than a compliance checkbox. Moreover, sustainability and circular economy practices obligate providers to integrate refurbishment, asset disposition, and lifecycle transparency into their service models, creating new operational disciplines and audit requirements.
Finally, workforce expectations and hybrid work patterns are influencing device personalization and warranty expectations, compelling vendors to balance scale efficiencies with individualized configurations. In aggregate, these shifts force both buyers and sellers to rethink contractual frameworks, tooling investments, and partnership ecosystems to ensure DaaS offerings deliver measurable business outcomes rather than simple hardware refreshes.
Assessment of how cumulative United States tariff measures through 2025 influenced global sourcing, procurement strategies, contract design, and device lifecycle decisions
U.S. tariff policy and trade measures announced and implemented through 2025 have exerted a cumulative influence on global supply chains that support device manufacturing, component sourcing, and logistics. The tariff environment has encouraged procurement teams and vendors to reassess global sourcing strategies, pushing some organizations to diversify suppliers or pursue nearshoring options to mitigate cost volatility and lead-time risk. Consequently, procurement cycles now include more rigorous supply-side scenario planning and clauses that address duty exposure and pass-through mechanisms.
In addition to sourcing shifts, tariff-driven cost pressures have accelerated negotiations over total cost of ownership agreements and prompted an increased emphasis on inventory strategies that prioritize buffer stock for critical components. Vendors are responding by offering longer-term service agreements, hedging strategies, and contract terms that aim to stabilize pricing over the service term. At the same time, the cumulative tariff impact has intensified the focus on product design choices, with manufacturers exploring component substitutions and alternative bill-of-materials configurations to preserve price points while maintaining performance.
Importantly, these trade dynamics have not only affected acquisition economics but also influenced decisions around refurbishment and secondary markets. When new-device costs become less predictable, extending device lifecycles and enhancing refurbishment pipelines emerge as tangible ways to control spend and maintain workforce device availability, thereby reinforcing the centrality of managed services within DaaS offerings.
Granular segmentation analysis that links device classes, integrated service bundles, industry-specific requirements, and enterprise scale to practical DaaS packaging and delivery choices
Segmentation reveals how demand for Device-as-a-Service varies by the type of device, the service components included, the industry context, and the scale of the organization, and these distinctions directly inform product packaging and go-to-market strategies. When analyzing devices, desktop and laptop configurations command different support and lifecycle profiles, with laptops presenting sub-segmentation into convertible, notebook, and ultrabook classes that each require tailored warranty, repair, and asset management approaches. Smartphones and tablets similarly demand mobile device management integration and bespoke security controls that differ from fixed workstation models.
Service offering segmentation shows that Hardware As A Service provides the foundation for subscription-based device access, while Managed Services supplements that foundation with critical elements such as asset disposal, break-fix, and lifecycle management, each of which drives recurring service engagement and deeper vendor-client relationships. Software As A Service complements these layers by delivering device-related productivity, security, and provisioning tools that enable remote management and telemetry-driven support.
Industry verticals shape adoption patterns and compliance requirements; financial services, education, government, healthcare, and IT and telecom each present unique regulatory constraints, user experience expectations, and refresh cadences that influence service-level design. Finally, organization size matters: large enterprises typically demand global logistics, enterprise-grade security, and complex vendor governance; medium enterprises prioritize balanced cost and managed support; and small enterprises often seek simplified pricing and turnkey device onboarding. Taken together, these segmentation lenses clarify where providers should concentrate technical investments, service orchestration, and sales motions to meet differentiated client needs.
Regional market dynamics and operational imperatives across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine DaaS delivery models and go-to-market priorities
Regional dynamics materially affect procurement decisions, service delivery models, and partnership ecosystems across the principal global markets. In the Americas, buyers often prioritize flexible commercial terms, rapid logistics, and end-user experience, which increases demand for well-integrated support and localized repair networks. Vendors operating here must therefore balance national-level compliance with state and provincial regulations while maintaining efficient reverse logistics for asset disposition.
Within Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory heterogeneity and strong sustainability mandates influence both procurement and refurbishment strategies. Providers active in this region need robust data protection frameworks, extended warranty options, and end-of-life processes that satisfy circular economy reporting. Meanwhile, complex cross-border VAT and customs considerations require suppliers to maintain sophisticated tax and logistics capabilities.
In the Asia-Pacific region, supply-side proximity to major manufacturing hubs coexists with fast-moving demand patterns and diverse channel structures. Vendors there often emphasize rapid scale-up, competitive pricing, and strong partnerships with local carriers and repair networks. These regional contrasts imply that successful providers will tailor their operating models and commercial structures to meet distinct expectations across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all playbook.
Competitive ecosystem overview showing how OEMs, managed service specialists, integrators, and software platform providers differentiate through service innovation, partnerships, and sustainability practices
Competitive dynamics in Device-as-a-Service reflect an ecosystem where original equipment manufacturers, independent managed service providers, and technology integrators all stake distinct claims based on their core strengths. Established hardware vendors leverage scale, brand recognition, and existing channel relationships to bundle device financing with service guarantees, while specialist managed service providers differentiate through deep lifecycle management capabilities and bespoke support operations. Cloud and software vendors increasingly embed device management capabilities into broader platform offerings, creating tighter integrations between endpoint telemetry and productivity or security tooling.
Market-leading organizations are investing in digital service platforms that centralize device telemetry, automate incident resolution, and provide transparent reporting dashboards for administrators and procurement teams. Strategic partnerships and white-label agreements also shape competitive positioning, enabling firms to extend geographic reach or to add niche repair and refurbishment capabilities more quickly than through organic development alone. Additionally, companies that can demonstrate measurable sustainability practices, such as certified refurbishment processes and transparent downstream asset tracking, tend to gain influence in procurement conversations that prioritize environmental credentials.
In this environment, vendors that combine rigorous operational discipline, clear contractual terms, and modular service offerings are best positioned to convert trials into long-term contracts and to expand footprint across enterprise accounts.
Actionable strategic steps for providers and enterprise buyers to standardize offerings, fortify supply chains, embed sustainability, and scale outcome-driven service delivery
Industry leaders should take deliberate actions that align commercial strategy with operational excellence to capture the full potential of Device-as-a-Service. First, rationalize product and service catalogs to create modular offerings that can be quickly tailored to client segments while preserving margin through standardized backend operations. This includes offering predictable pricing structures, transparent SLAs, and optional add-ons such as advanced security or enhanced warranty terms.
Second, invest in resilience across the supply chain by diversifying component sources, developing nearshoring options where feasible, and formalizing tariff and duty mitigation clauses in contracts. Coupled with improvements in inventory visibility and predictive parts procurement, these measures reduce service disruption risk. Third, embed sustainability into the service value proposition by formalizing refurbishment pipelines, certified disposal processes, and lifecycle reporting to meet procurement and regulatory expectations.
Fourth, strengthen customer success functions to ensure onboarding, analytics-driven support, and outcome measurement are central to delivery. Finally, pursue partnerships that extend repair networks, enable local logistics efficiency, and integrate software telemetry across the device estate. By executing these actions, leaders can convert operational capabilities into competitive differentiation and sustained contractual relationships.
Robust multi-method research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, secondary regulatory and industry analysis, data triangulation, and rigorous validation to underpin findings
This research synthesized qualitative and quantitative inputs using a multi-method approach designed to produce reliable, actionable insights. Primary research included structured interviews with procurement leaders, IT and security decision-makers, and vendor executives to capture first-hand perspectives on contractual preferences, service challenges, and operational best practices. These interviews were complemented by scenario workshops that helped validate assumptions about lifecycle management, refurbishment economics, and regional delivery constraints.
Secondary research involved a thorough review of public corporate disclosures, regulatory guidance, and industry publications to contextualize trade policy impacts, sustainability requirements, and security standards relevant to device management. Data triangulation was applied to reconcile vendor-reported capabilities with buyer experiences and independent operational indicators, ensuring that findings reflect practical realities rather than vendor positioning alone.
Analytical techniques included segmentation mapping, vendor capability scoring, and risk-impact assessments for supply chain and regulatory variables. Throughout the methodology, quality controls such as peer review, analyst validation, and consistency checks were used to reduce bias and to ensure that conclusions are both defensible and relevant to decision-makers looking to implement or refine Device-as-a-Service strategies.
Conclusive synthesis confirming Device-as-a-Service as a strategic enabler that requires aligned procurement, operational rigor, and sustainability to deliver measurable outcomes
Device-as-a-Service represents a convergence of procurement innovation, operational discipline, and service-led business models. The cumulative effect of changing work patterns, heightened security expectations, and trade policy volatility has pushed DaaS beyond simple device financing into the realm of strategic infrastructure for the digital workplace. Organizations that approach DaaS with clearly defined outcome metrics, rigorous vendor governance, and a commitment to lifecycle optimization stand to capture efficiency gains while reducing operational risk.
At the same time, suppliers that invest in modular service architectures, integrated telemetry platforms, and certified circular-economy processes will be better equipped to win enterprise mandates and to scale across regions. In short, success in the DaaS era depends on alignment between procurement intent, IT operational capability, and vendor service execution, with sustainability and security serving as decisive differentiators in procurement decisions.
The conclusion is pragmatic: DaaS is a strategic enabler rather than a commodity option, and realizing its benefits requires intentional design of contracts, logistics, and support operations that collectively deliver measurable business outcomes.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic orientation that explains why Device-as-a-Service is now central to enterprise procurement, operational resilience, workforce enablement, and sustainability agendas
The Device-as-a-Service model has evolved from a peripheral procurement option into a strategic vehicle for organizations seeking predictable costs, simplified device lifecycle management, and stronger alignment between technology and business outcomes. As organizations continue to prioritize employee experience, security posture, and sustainability, DaaS offers a coherent means to consolidate hardware, software, and managed services under a single subscription framework. This introduction situates the reader at the intersection of operational necessity and commercial innovation, where DaaS becomes both a cost-management tool and a platform for digital workplace transformation.
Transitioning to DaaS requires a synthesis of procurement discipline, vendor governance, and internal change management. Procurement teams must reconcile short-term budgetary constraints with the long-term benefits of device standardization, predictable refresh cycles, and integrated support services. Meanwhile, IT and security leaders must embed endpoint lifecycle practices within broader enterprise risk frameworks to ensure compliance with evolving data protection and device management standards. Together, these dynamics frame DaaS as a cross-functional initiative that extends well beyond hardware provisioning.
Finally, this report adopts a pragmatic lens: it highlights operational levers that enterprises can use to maximize device uptime, streamline support channels, and advance sustainability goals, while also recognizing the commercial shifts suppliers must undertake to deliver consistent, scalable service outcomes.
How consumption economics, security mandates, sustainability expectations, and evolving work models are reshaping Device-as-a-Service value chains and contractual dynamics
The landscape for provisioning endpoints and workspace technology is undergoing several transformative shifts that reconfigure value creation for both buyers and suppliers. First, consumption models are migrating from capital expenditure toward service-based procurement, which reshapes vendor incentives and obligates providers to extend outcomes-based guarantees. This shift promotes closer alignment between device performance and service-level commitments, which in turn elevates the importance of analytics, remote support, and predictive maintenance.
Concurrently, cybersecurity and zero trust architectures have escalated the strategic utility of centrally managed endpoints. As a result, security tooling, firmware management, and secure provisioning increasingly converge with device leasing, making security a differentiator rather than a compliance checkbox. Moreover, sustainability and circular economy practices obligate providers to integrate refurbishment, asset disposition, and lifecycle transparency into their service models, creating new operational disciplines and audit requirements.
Finally, workforce expectations and hybrid work patterns are influencing device personalization and warranty expectations, compelling vendors to balance scale efficiencies with individualized configurations. In aggregate, these shifts force both buyers and sellers to rethink contractual frameworks, tooling investments, and partnership ecosystems to ensure DaaS offerings deliver measurable business outcomes rather than simple hardware refreshes.
Assessment of how cumulative United States tariff measures through 2025 influenced global sourcing, procurement strategies, contract design, and device lifecycle decisions
U.S. tariff policy and trade measures announced and implemented through 2025 have exerted a cumulative influence on global supply chains that support device manufacturing, component sourcing, and logistics. The tariff environment has encouraged procurement teams and vendors to reassess global sourcing strategies, pushing some organizations to diversify suppliers or pursue nearshoring options to mitigate cost volatility and lead-time risk. Consequently, procurement cycles now include more rigorous supply-side scenario planning and clauses that address duty exposure and pass-through mechanisms.
In addition to sourcing shifts, tariff-driven cost pressures have accelerated negotiations over total cost of ownership agreements and prompted an increased emphasis on inventory strategies that prioritize buffer stock for critical components. Vendors are responding by offering longer-term service agreements, hedging strategies, and contract terms that aim to stabilize pricing over the service term. At the same time, the cumulative tariff impact has intensified the focus on product design choices, with manufacturers exploring component substitutions and alternative bill-of-materials configurations to preserve price points while maintaining performance.
Importantly, these trade dynamics have not only affected acquisition economics but also influenced decisions around refurbishment and secondary markets. When new-device costs become less predictable, extending device lifecycles and enhancing refurbishment pipelines emerge as tangible ways to control spend and maintain workforce device availability, thereby reinforcing the centrality of managed services within DaaS offerings.
Granular segmentation analysis that links device classes, integrated service bundles, industry-specific requirements, and enterprise scale to practical DaaS packaging and delivery choices
Segmentation reveals how demand for Device-as-a-Service varies by the type of device, the service components included, the industry context, and the scale of the organization, and these distinctions directly inform product packaging and go-to-market strategies. When analyzing devices, desktop and laptop configurations command different support and lifecycle profiles, with laptops presenting sub-segmentation into convertible, notebook, and ultrabook classes that each require tailored warranty, repair, and asset management approaches. Smartphones and tablets similarly demand mobile device management integration and bespoke security controls that differ from fixed workstation models.
Service offering segmentation shows that Hardware As A Service provides the foundation for subscription-based device access, while Managed Services supplements that foundation with critical elements such as asset disposal, break-fix, and lifecycle management, each of which drives recurring service engagement and deeper vendor-client relationships. Software As A Service complements these layers by delivering device-related productivity, security, and provisioning tools that enable remote management and telemetry-driven support.
Industry verticals shape adoption patterns and compliance requirements; financial services, education, government, healthcare, and IT and telecom each present unique regulatory constraints, user experience expectations, and refresh cadences that influence service-level design. Finally, organization size matters: large enterprises typically demand global logistics, enterprise-grade security, and complex vendor governance; medium enterprises prioritize balanced cost and managed support; and small enterprises often seek simplified pricing and turnkey device onboarding. Taken together, these segmentation lenses clarify where providers should concentrate technical investments, service orchestration, and sales motions to meet differentiated client needs.
Regional market dynamics and operational imperatives across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine DaaS delivery models and go-to-market priorities
Regional dynamics materially affect procurement decisions, service delivery models, and partnership ecosystems across the principal global markets. In the Americas, buyers often prioritize flexible commercial terms, rapid logistics, and end-user experience, which increases demand for well-integrated support and localized repair networks. Vendors operating here must therefore balance national-level compliance with state and provincial regulations while maintaining efficient reverse logistics for asset disposition.
Within Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory heterogeneity and strong sustainability mandates influence both procurement and refurbishment strategies. Providers active in this region need robust data protection frameworks, extended warranty options, and end-of-life processes that satisfy circular economy reporting. Meanwhile, complex cross-border VAT and customs considerations require suppliers to maintain sophisticated tax and logistics capabilities.
In the Asia-Pacific region, supply-side proximity to major manufacturing hubs coexists with fast-moving demand patterns and diverse channel structures. Vendors there often emphasize rapid scale-up, competitive pricing, and strong partnerships with local carriers and repair networks. These regional contrasts imply that successful providers will tailor their operating models and commercial structures to meet distinct expectations across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all playbook.
Competitive ecosystem overview showing how OEMs, managed service specialists, integrators, and software platform providers differentiate through service innovation, partnerships, and sustainability practices
Competitive dynamics in Device-as-a-Service reflect an ecosystem where original equipment manufacturers, independent managed service providers, and technology integrators all stake distinct claims based on their core strengths. Established hardware vendors leverage scale, brand recognition, and existing channel relationships to bundle device financing with service guarantees, while specialist managed service providers differentiate through deep lifecycle management capabilities and bespoke support operations. Cloud and software vendors increasingly embed device management capabilities into broader platform offerings, creating tighter integrations between endpoint telemetry and productivity or security tooling.
Market-leading organizations are investing in digital service platforms that centralize device telemetry, automate incident resolution, and provide transparent reporting dashboards for administrators and procurement teams. Strategic partnerships and white-label agreements also shape competitive positioning, enabling firms to extend geographic reach or to add niche repair and refurbishment capabilities more quickly than through organic development alone. Additionally, companies that can demonstrate measurable sustainability practices, such as certified refurbishment processes and transparent downstream asset tracking, tend to gain influence in procurement conversations that prioritize environmental credentials.
In this environment, vendors that combine rigorous operational discipline, clear contractual terms, and modular service offerings are best positioned to convert trials into long-term contracts and to expand footprint across enterprise accounts.
Actionable strategic steps for providers and enterprise buyers to standardize offerings, fortify supply chains, embed sustainability, and scale outcome-driven service delivery
Industry leaders should take deliberate actions that align commercial strategy with operational excellence to capture the full potential of Device-as-a-Service. First, rationalize product and service catalogs to create modular offerings that can be quickly tailored to client segments while preserving margin through standardized backend operations. This includes offering predictable pricing structures, transparent SLAs, and optional add-ons such as advanced security or enhanced warranty terms.
Second, invest in resilience across the supply chain by diversifying component sources, developing nearshoring options where feasible, and formalizing tariff and duty mitigation clauses in contracts. Coupled with improvements in inventory visibility and predictive parts procurement, these measures reduce service disruption risk. Third, embed sustainability into the service value proposition by formalizing refurbishment pipelines, certified disposal processes, and lifecycle reporting to meet procurement and regulatory expectations.
Fourth, strengthen customer success functions to ensure onboarding, analytics-driven support, and outcome measurement are central to delivery. Finally, pursue partnerships that extend repair networks, enable local logistics efficiency, and integrate software telemetry across the device estate. By executing these actions, leaders can convert operational capabilities into competitive differentiation and sustained contractual relationships.
Robust multi-method research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, secondary regulatory and industry analysis, data triangulation, and rigorous validation to underpin findings
This research synthesized qualitative and quantitative inputs using a multi-method approach designed to produce reliable, actionable insights. Primary research included structured interviews with procurement leaders, IT and security decision-makers, and vendor executives to capture first-hand perspectives on contractual preferences, service challenges, and operational best practices. These interviews were complemented by scenario workshops that helped validate assumptions about lifecycle management, refurbishment economics, and regional delivery constraints.
Secondary research involved a thorough review of public corporate disclosures, regulatory guidance, and industry publications to contextualize trade policy impacts, sustainability requirements, and security standards relevant to device management. Data triangulation was applied to reconcile vendor-reported capabilities with buyer experiences and independent operational indicators, ensuring that findings reflect practical realities rather than vendor positioning alone.
Analytical techniques included segmentation mapping, vendor capability scoring, and risk-impact assessments for supply chain and regulatory variables. Throughout the methodology, quality controls such as peer review, analyst validation, and consistency checks were used to reduce bias and to ensure that conclusions are both defensible and relevant to decision-makers looking to implement or refine Device-as-a-Service strategies.
Conclusive synthesis confirming Device-as-a-Service as a strategic enabler that requires aligned procurement, operational rigor, and sustainability to deliver measurable outcomes
Device-as-a-Service represents a convergence of procurement innovation, operational discipline, and service-led business models. The cumulative effect of changing work patterns, heightened security expectations, and trade policy volatility has pushed DaaS beyond simple device financing into the realm of strategic infrastructure for the digital workplace. Organizations that approach DaaS with clearly defined outcome metrics, rigorous vendor governance, and a commitment to lifecycle optimization stand to capture efficiency gains while reducing operational risk.
At the same time, suppliers that invest in modular service architectures, integrated telemetry platforms, and certified circular-economy processes will be better equipped to win enterprise mandates and to scale across regions. In short, success in the DaaS era depends on alignment between procurement intent, IT operational capability, and vendor service execution, with sustainability and security serving as decisive differentiators in procurement decisions.
The conclusion is pragmatic: DaaS is a strategic enabler rather than a commodity option, and realizing its benefits requires intentional design of contracts, logistics, and support operations that collectively deliver measurable business outcomes.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
193 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-driven device lifecycle management platforms for proactive maintenance and optimization
- 5.2. Adoption of circular economy principles in device-as-a-service models to enable sustainable hardware reuse
- 5.3. Implementation of zero-trust security frameworks with real-time threat detection for subscription devices
- 5.4. Expansion of flexible subscription bundles combining hardware leasing with software and analytics services
- 5.5. Development of multi-vendor interoperability standards to streamline device integration and management
- 5.6. Growing emphasis on remote workforce device provisioning with zero-touch deployment and centralized monitoring
- 5.7. Compliance-driven device disposal and data sanitization processes meeting evolving global privacy regulations
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Device-as-a-Service Market, by Device Type
- 8.1. Computing Devices
- 8.1.1. Laptops
- 8.1.2. Desktops
- 8.2. Mobile Devices
- 8.2.1. Smartphones
- 8.2.2. Tablets
- 8.3. Peripheral Devices
- 8.3.1. Printers
- 8.3.2. Scanners
- 8.3.3. Monitors
- 8.4. Networking Devices
- 8.4.1. Routers
- 8.4.2. Switches
- 8.5. Servers
- 8.5.1. Rack Servers
- 8.5.2. Blade Servers
- 8.5.3. Tower Servers
- 9. Device-as-a-Service Market, by Offering
- 9.1. Hardware
- 9.2. Software
- 9.3. Services
- 9.3.1. Professional Services
- 9.3.1.1. Consulting
- 9.3.1.2. Integration & Deployment
- 9.3.1.3. Customization
- 9.3.2. Managed Services
- 9.3.2.1. Device Management
- 9.3.2.2. Asset Monitoring & Reporting
- 10. Device-as-a-Service Market, by Business Model
- 10.1. Subscription Model
- 10.2. Leasing Model
- 10.3. Pay-per-Use Model
- 11. Device-as-a-Service Market, by Organization Size
- 11.1. Large Enterprise
- 11.2. Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
- 12. Device-as-a-Service Market, by End User Industry
- 12.1. Banking Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI)
- 12.2. Education
- 12.3. Government & Public Sector
- 12.4. Healthcare & Life Sciences
- 12.4.1. Hospitals & Clinics
- 12.4.2. Research Institutions
- 12.4.3. Pharmaceutical Companies
- 12.5. IT & Telecommunications
- 12.5.1. Cloud Service Providers
- 12.5.2. Network Operators
- 12.5.3. Software Development Firms
- 12.6. Manufacturing
- 12.6.1. Automotive
- 12.6.2. Electronics
- 12.6.3. Industrial Equipment
- 12.7. Transportation & Logistics
- 12.7.1. Fleet Management
- 12.7.2. Warehousing
- 13. Device-as-a-Service Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Device-as-a-Service Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Device-as-a-Service Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Acer Inc.
- 16.3.2. Microsoft Corporation
- 16.3.3. Accenture plc
- 16.3.4. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
- 16.3.5. Apple Inc.
- 16.3.6. ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
- 16.3.7. AT&T Inc.
- 16.3.8. Atea Global Services, SIA
- 16.3.9. Atos SE
- 16.3.10. Canon Inc.
- 16.3.11. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
- 16.3.12. CompuCom Systems, Inc.
- 16.3.13. Computacenter plc
- 16.3.14. Dell Inc.
- 16.3.15. Fujitsu Limited
- 16.3.16. HCL Technologies Limited
- 16.3.17. Hitachi, Ltd.
- 16.3.18. HP Inc.
- 16.3.19. Intel Corporation
- 16.3.20. International Business Machines Corporation
- 16.3.21. Lenovo Group Limited
- 16.3.22. NEC Corporation
- 16.3.23. Panasonic Corporation
- 16.3.24. Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- 16.3.25. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.26. SHI International Corp.
- 16.3.27. Tata Consultancy Services Limited
- 16.3.28. Wipro Limited
- 16.3.29. Xerox Corporation
- 16.3.30. Cisco Systems, Inc
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
