DevSecOps Market by Offering (Services, Solutions), Type (Compliance as Code, Infrastructure as Code, Policy as Code), Deployment Mode, Organization Size, Industry Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The DevSecOps Market was valued at USD 6.96 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 7.72 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 11.53%, reaching USD 16.67 billion by 2032.
An essential primer on why integrating security into development lifecycles is a strategic imperative for modern digital organizations transforming operations and risk management
The landscape of modern software delivery and security is undergoing a fundamental transformation driven by the convergence of development, operations, and security disciplines. As organizations accelerate digital initiatives and rely more heavily on cloud-native architectures, the integration of security into every phase of the software lifecycle has moved from a best practice to a strategic imperative. This introduction frames the discussion around how organizations are adapting organizational structures, workflows, and toolchains to embed security-as-code principles, automate compliance checks, and shorten feedback loops between developers and security teams.
Emerging practices in secure software development are no longer isolated activities conducted late in the pipeline; instead, they are embedded into continuous integration and continuous delivery workflows, automating policies, and shifting detection earlier. The resulting benefits include reduced remediation costs, faster time to market, and improved resilience against sophisticated threats. However, realizing these benefits requires attention to culture, governance, tooling interoperability, and measurable metrics that link security investments to business outcomes. This opening section establishes the context for the deeper analysis that follows, emphasizing the imperative for executive leadership to prioritize integrated security strategies across people, process, and technology.
How cloud-native adoption, policy-driven automation, and organizational realignment are collectively redefining DevSecOps practices and control frameworks for modern enterprises
The past few years have produced several transformative shifts that are reshaping how organizations approach DevSecOps, and these shifts are accelerating the move from point solutions to integrated, policy-driven platforms. First, the rise of cloud-native deployments, container orchestration, and microservices architectures has multiplied the number of runtime and build-time touchpoints requiring security controls. Security has therefore shifted from a perimeter-centric model to an observability- and policy-centric model that must operate across ephemeral workloads and distributed systems.
Second, the commoditization of automation and infrastructure as code has made it possible to codify security policies, creating repeatable, auditable controls that travel with applications. This enables organizations to scale secure practices across distributed teams while retaining governance. Third, regulatory and compliance frameworks are increasingly oriented around demonstrable controls and continuous evidence, prompting security and compliance teams to prioritize tooling that produces verifiable artifacts and continuous attestations. Finally, the talent and organizational paradigms are evolving: cross-functional teams, platform engineering, and developer-centric security enablement are replacing gatekeeper models. Together these shifts require a different operating model-one that favors programmable policy, continuous validation, and shared responsibility across engineering and security leaders.
Understanding the broader implications of recent United States tariff changes on procurement, supply chain resilience, and strategic sourcing for technology and security services
In 2025, trade policy and tariff dynamics in the United States introduced new considerations for global supply chains, procurement strategies, and vendor selection in technology stacks. These measures have implications for software and service sourcing decisions, procurement lead times, and the cost structures for organizations that depend on cross-border technology delivery. As a result, procurement teams and technology leaders must reassess vendor diversification, localization of critical functions, and contractual terms to preserve continuity of operations while managing cost impacts.
The cumulative effect of tariff changes has prompted many organizations to place greater emphasis on supply chain resilience and visibility. This includes a renewed focus on the provenance of hardware used in data centers and edge deployments, and an increased scrutiny of third-party service dependencies and managed services contracts. Increased customs and import considerations have also influenced decisions about where to host certain workloads and where to situate development and testing activities. In some cases, organizations have accelerated investments in domestically hosted cloud services or regionally based development centers to reduce exposure, while others have renegotiated vendor SLAs and established additional contingencies. Looking ahead, decision-makers will need to factor evolving trade policies into strategic sourcing, contract negotiations, and disaster recovery planning to maintain operational flexibility.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis revealing how offering types, deployment models, organizational scale, and industry-specific drivers determine strategic priorities and solution fit
A nuanced approach to market segmentation provides clarity on where value is created and where investment should be prioritized. When examined by offering, the market separates into Services-further split into managed services and professional services-and Solutions that encompass application security testing, cloud security and compliance, container and microservices security, identity and access management, incident detection and response, and secure software development. This delineation highlights the importance of both outcome-oriented services that deliver operational support and advisory capabilities, and productized solutions that embed controls directly into development and runtime environments.
Viewing the market through the lens of type reveals distinct operational philosophies: compliance as code, infrastructure as code, policy as code, and security as code each emphasize different touchpoints for automation and verification. Deployment mode segmentation underscores differing operational trade-offs between cloud and on-premises environments, where cloud deployments emphasize elasticity and vendor-managed controls while on-premises deployments emphasize local control and custom integration. Organization size introduces further distinction; large enterprises typically require scalable governance, integration with complex legacy systems, and enterprise-grade support, whereas small and medium-sized enterprises often prioritize ease of adoption, cost-effective managed capabilities, and rapid time to value. Finally, industry vertical segmentation-spanning banking, financial services and insurance, education, energy and utilities, government and public sector, healthcare and life sciences, IT and telecom, manufacturing, media and entertainment, and retail and e-commerce-illustrates how sector-specific compliance regimes, threat models, and customer expectations shape the emphasis placed on particular capabilities. Taken together, these segmentation dimensions inform product roadmaps, go-to-market strategies, and implementation approaches that must be tailored to distinct buyer needs.
Regional market dynamics and regulatory considerations that shape adoption patterns, procurement preferences, and localized security strategies across major global regions
Regional dynamics continue to shape how organizations prioritize investments in secure software practices and the supporting ecosystem. In the Americas, demand is frequently driven by a heavy concentration of digital-native firms and large enterprises that prioritize rapid innovation, regulatory compliance, and robust incident response capabilities. This region often emphasizes hybrid cloud strategies and platform engineering approaches that enable centralized governance while supporting distributed teams. Conversely, Europe, Middle East & Africa displays heterogeneous regulatory landscapes and varying levels of cloud adoption; organizations in this region place substantial weight on data residency, cross-border data transfer rules, and sector-specific compliance requirements, which influence preferences for on-premises controls and regionalized managed services.
Asia-Pacific presents a diverse set of adoption patterns influenced by rapid cloud adoption in some markets and legacy system reliance in others. Regulatory regimes and local procurement policies in the region can accelerate demand for localized offerings and partnerships with regional service providers. Across all regions, there is a shared emphasis on building resilient supply chains, enhancing visibility into third-party dependencies, and securing cloud-native workloads. These regional distinctions require vendors and enterprise buyers to adapt engagement models, prioritize localized compliance and integration capabilities, and structure support and training services that reflect language, regulatory, and operational nuances.
How vendor consolidation, platform convergence, and strategic partnerships are reshaping competitive dynamics and influencing enterprise procurement decisions in DevSecOps
Competitive dynamics across the DevSecOps ecosystem are shaped by a combination of technology innovation, go-to-market partnerships, and evolving buyer expectations. Leading organizations in the space differentiate through integrated platforms that reduce toolchain complexity, through deep automation that enables policy-as-code enforcement across build and runtime environments, and through robust observability that surfaces actionable security signals without overwhelming developers. There is a clear trend toward converged offerings that blend prevention, detection, and response capabilities with developer-friendly workflows and CI/CD integrations.
Strategic alliances and channel partnerships are increasingly important, enabling vendors to extend reach into enterprise accounts and to bundle capabilities with cloud service providers, systems integrators, and managed security service providers. Mergers and acquisitions remain a key mechanism for incumbents and investors to acquire niche capabilities, expand domain coverage, and accelerate time to market for specialized functions such as runtime protection for containers or automated compliance attestations. For enterprise buyers, vendor evaluation increasingly centers on integration maturity, support for policy-driven automation, and demonstrated success in complex, regulated environments. As the ecosystem matures, vendors that can combine strong developer ergonomics with enterprise-grade governance and support will be best positioned to capture sustained engagement from large programs.
Actionable strategic priorities for executives to operationalize secure development practices, strengthen supply chain resilience, and accelerate developer-centric security adoption
Industry leaders must translate strategic intent into concrete actions that accelerate secure delivery while maintaining velocity. First, leaders should prioritize establishing clear governance and measurable objectives for integrating security into development pipelines, ensuring that KPIs link security outcomes to business value and customer trust. Second, investing in platform engineering and developer enablement reduces friction by embedding security guardrails into standard tooling, templates, and developer workflows rather than relying on manual approvals. This approach lowers the cognitive load on engineering teams and increases adoption of secure practices.
Third, procurement and risk teams should implement diversified sourcing strategies that include vendor redundancy, local partners, and contractual terms that address supply chain and tariff-driven risks. Fourth, organizations must cultivate cross-functional capabilities by aligning security, compliance, and engineering through shared objectives, joint training programs, and rotational development opportunities that increase mutual understanding. Finally, leaders should adopt a phased automation roadmap that begins with high-impact, low-friction policies and progressively automates complex attestations, ensuring that measurement, feedback, and continuous improvement are embedded at each stage. These actions help enterprises balance innovation speed with resilient security postures and create scalable models for long-term success.
Rigorous and transparent research methodology combining practitioner interviews, technical validation, and cross-source triangulation to generate actionable and reliable insights
This analysis synthesizes primary and secondary research inputs to construct an evidence-based narrative about current trends, operational practices, and strategic implications for secure software delivery. Primary research includes interviews with senior security and engineering leaders, procurement specialists, platform engineering teams, and managed service providers to capture decision drivers, implementation challenges, and best practices. Secondary research incorporates regulatory guidance, industry white papers, technical standards, and publicly available vendor documentation to contextualize observed behaviors and validate practitioner perspectives.
Findings were triangulated across multiple sources to ensure reliability and to surface consistent themes. Qualitative insights were complemented by comparative vendor capability reviews and scenario-based assessments that examine how different segmentation choices-such as offering mix, type of automation, deployment mode, organizational scale, and industry vertical-impact implementation approaches. The methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions, clear delineation between observation and interpretation, and the use of exemplars to illustrate effective patterns. Throughout, the analysis prioritizes actionable intelligence that leaders can use to inform strategy, procurement, and operational design without relying on proprietary or undisclosed data.
A strategic synthesis of how integrated security practices, policy-driven automation, and resilient sourcing collectively enable sustainable innovation and enterprise risk reduction
The conclusion synthesizes the report’s core messages and highlights the imperative for leadership to adopt integrated, automated, and measurable approaches to secure software delivery. Organizations that successfully embed security into development lifecycles balance developer productivity with robust governance, leverage policy-as-code and infrastructure-as-code to produce verifiable controls, and adopt platform-focused enablement to scale best practices across teams. These changes require not only technology investments but also adjustments to organizational structures, incentives, and metrics that align security outcomes with business objectives.
Looking forward, resilience will be defined by an organization’s ability to adapt to regulatory shifts, supply chain dynamics, and evolving threat vectors while preserving the pace of innovation. Decision-makers should therefore focus on building modular, interoperable architectures; investing in observable controls that provide continuous assurance; and strengthening supplier and deployment diversity to mitigate external risks. By doing so, enterprises can transform security from a gating function into a strategic enabler that protects value, supports growth, and sustains customer trust.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An essential primer on why integrating security into development lifecycles is a strategic imperative for modern digital organizations transforming operations and risk management
The landscape of modern software delivery and security is undergoing a fundamental transformation driven by the convergence of development, operations, and security disciplines. As organizations accelerate digital initiatives and rely more heavily on cloud-native architectures, the integration of security into every phase of the software lifecycle has moved from a best practice to a strategic imperative. This introduction frames the discussion around how organizations are adapting organizational structures, workflows, and toolchains to embed security-as-code principles, automate compliance checks, and shorten feedback loops between developers and security teams.
Emerging practices in secure software development are no longer isolated activities conducted late in the pipeline; instead, they are embedded into continuous integration and continuous delivery workflows, automating policies, and shifting detection earlier. The resulting benefits include reduced remediation costs, faster time to market, and improved resilience against sophisticated threats. However, realizing these benefits requires attention to culture, governance, tooling interoperability, and measurable metrics that link security investments to business outcomes. This opening section establishes the context for the deeper analysis that follows, emphasizing the imperative for executive leadership to prioritize integrated security strategies across people, process, and technology.
How cloud-native adoption, policy-driven automation, and organizational realignment are collectively redefining DevSecOps practices and control frameworks for modern enterprises
The past few years have produced several transformative shifts that are reshaping how organizations approach DevSecOps, and these shifts are accelerating the move from point solutions to integrated, policy-driven platforms. First, the rise of cloud-native deployments, container orchestration, and microservices architectures has multiplied the number of runtime and build-time touchpoints requiring security controls. Security has therefore shifted from a perimeter-centric model to an observability- and policy-centric model that must operate across ephemeral workloads and distributed systems.
Second, the commoditization of automation and infrastructure as code has made it possible to codify security policies, creating repeatable, auditable controls that travel with applications. This enables organizations to scale secure practices across distributed teams while retaining governance. Third, regulatory and compliance frameworks are increasingly oriented around demonstrable controls and continuous evidence, prompting security and compliance teams to prioritize tooling that produces verifiable artifacts and continuous attestations. Finally, the talent and organizational paradigms are evolving: cross-functional teams, platform engineering, and developer-centric security enablement are replacing gatekeeper models. Together these shifts require a different operating model-one that favors programmable policy, continuous validation, and shared responsibility across engineering and security leaders.
Understanding the broader implications of recent United States tariff changes on procurement, supply chain resilience, and strategic sourcing for technology and security services
In 2025, trade policy and tariff dynamics in the United States introduced new considerations for global supply chains, procurement strategies, and vendor selection in technology stacks. These measures have implications for software and service sourcing decisions, procurement lead times, and the cost structures for organizations that depend on cross-border technology delivery. As a result, procurement teams and technology leaders must reassess vendor diversification, localization of critical functions, and contractual terms to preserve continuity of operations while managing cost impacts.
The cumulative effect of tariff changes has prompted many organizations to place greater emphasis on supply chain resilience and visibility. This includes a renewed focus on the provenance of hardware used in data centers and edge deployments, and an increased scrutiny of third-party service dependencies and managed services contracts. Increased customs and import considerations have also influenced decisions about where to host certain workloads and where to situate development and testing activities. In some cases, organizations have accelerated investments in domestically hosted cloud services or regionally based development centers to reduce exposure, while others have renegotiated vendor SLAs and established additional contingencies. Looking ahead, decision-makers will need to factor evolving trade policies into strategic sourcing, contract negotiations, and disaster recovery planning to maintain operational flexibility.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis revealing how offering types, deployment models, organizational scale, and industry-specific drivers determine strategic priorities and solution fit
A nuanced approach to market segmentation provides clarity on where value is created and where investment should be prioritized. When examined by offering, the market separates into Services-further split into managed services and professional services-and Solutions that encompass application security testing, cloud security and compliance, container and microservices security, identity and access management, incident detection and response, and secure software development. This delineation highlights the importance of both outcome-oriented services that deliver operational support and advisory capabilities, and productized solutions that embed controls directly into development and runtime environments.
Viewing the market through the lens of type reveals distinct operational philosophies: compliance as code, infrastructure as code, policy as code, and security as code each emphasize different touchpoints for automation and verification. Deployment mode segmentation underscores differing operational trade-offs between cloud and on-premises environments, where cloud deployments emphasize elasticity and vendor-managed controls while on-premises deployments emphasize local control and custom integration. Organization size introduces further distinction; large enterprises typically require scalable governance, integration with complex legacy systems, and enterprise-grade support, whereas small and medium-sized enterprises often prioritize ease of adoption, cost-effective managed capabilities, and rapid time to value. Finally, industry vertical segmentation-spanning banking, financial services and insurance, education, energy and utilities, government and public sector, healthcare and life sciences, IT and telecom, manufacturing, media and entertainment, and retail and e-commerce-illustrates how sector-specific compliance regimes, threat models, and customer expectations shape the emphasis placed on particular capabilities. Taken together, these segmentation dimensions inform product roadmaps, go-to-market strategies, and implementation approaches that must be tailored to distinct buyer needs.
Regional market dynamics and regulatory considerations that shape adoption patterns, procurement preferences, and localized security strategies across major global regions
Regional dynamics continue to shape how organizations prioritize investments in secure software practices and the supporting ecosystem. In the Americas, demand is frequently driven by a heavy concentration of digital-native firms and large enterprises that prioritize rapid innovation, regulatory compliance, and robust incident response capabilities. This region often emphasizes hybrid cloud strategies and platform engineering approaches that enable centralized governance while supporting distributed teams. Conversely, Europe, Middle East & Africa displays heterogeneous regulatory landscapes and varying levels of cloud adoption; organizations in this region place substantial weight on data residency, cross-border data transfer rules, and sector-specific compliance requirements, which influence preferences for on-premises controls and regionalized managed services.
Asia-Pacific presents a diverse set of adoption patterns influenced by rapid cloud adoption in some markets and legacy system reliance in others. Regulatory regimes and local procurement policies in the region can accelerate demand for localized offerings and partnerships with regional service providers. Across all regions, there is a shared emphasis on building resilient supply chains, enhancing visibility into third-party dependencies, and securing cloud-native workloads. These regional distinctions require vendors and enterprise buyers to adapt engagement models, prioritize localized compliance and integration capabilities, and structure support and training services that reflect language, regulatory, and operational nuances.
How vendor consolidation, platform convergence, and strategic partnerships are reshaping competitive dynamics and influencing enterprise procurement decisions in DevSecOps
Competitive dynamics across the DevSecOps ecosystem are shaped by a combination of technology innovation, go-to-market partnerships, and evolving buyer expectations. Leading organizations in the space differentiate through integrated platforms that reduce toolchain complexity, through deep automation that enables policy-as-code enforcement across build and runtime environments, and through robust observability that surfaces actionable security signals without overwhelming developers. There is a clear trend toward converged offerings that blend prevention, detection, and response capabilities with developer-friendly workflows and CI/CD integrations.
Strategic alliances and channel partnerships are increasingly important, enabling vendors to extend reach into enterprise accounts and to bundle capabilities with cloud service providers, systems integrators, and managed security service providers. Mergers and acquisitions remain a key mechanism for incumbents and investors to acquire niche capabilities, expand domain coverage, and accelerate time to market for specialized functions such as runtime protection for containers or automated compliance attestations. For enterprise buyers, vendor evaluation increasingly centers on integration maturity, support for policy-driven automation, and demonstrated success in complex, regulated environments. As the ecosystem matures, vendors that can combine strong developer ergonomics with enterprise-grade governance and support will be best positioned to capture sustained engagement from large programs.
Actionable strategic priorities for executives to operationalize secure development practices, strengthen supply chain resilience, and accelerate developer-centric security adoption
Industry leaders must translate strategic intent into concrete actions that accelerate secure delivery while maintaining velocity. First, leaders should prioritize establishing clear governance and measurable objectives for integrating security into development pipelines, ensuring that KPIs link security outcomes to business value and customer trust. Second, investing in platform engineering and developer enablement reduces friction by embedding security guardrails into standard tooling, templates, and developer workflows rather than relying on manual approvals. This approach lowers the cognitive load on engineering teams and increases adoption of secure practices.
Third, procurement and risk teams should implement diversified sourcing strategies that include vendor redundancy, local partners, and contractual terms that address supply chain and tariff-driven risks. Fourth, organizations must cultivate cross-functional capabilities by aligning security, compliance, and engineering through shared objectives, joint training programs, and rotational development opportunities that increase mutual understanding. Finally, leaders should adopt a phased automation roadmap that begins with high-impact, low-friction policies and progressively automates complex attestations, ensuring that measurement, feedback, and continuous improvement are embedded at each stage. These actions help enterprises balance innovation speed with resilient security postures and create scalable models for long-term success.
Rigorous and transparent research methodology combining practitioner interviews, technical validation, and cross-source triangulation to generate actionable and reliable insights
This analysis synthesizes primary and secondary research inputs to construct an evidence-based narrative about current trends, operational practices, and strategic implications for secure software delivery. Primary research includes interviews with senior security and engineering leaders, procurement specialists, platform engineering teams, and managed service providers to capture decision drivers, implementation challenges, and best practices. Secondary research incorporates regulatory guidance, industry white papers, technical standards, and publicly available vendor documentation to contextualize observed behaviors and validate practitioner perspectives.
Findings were triangulated across multiple sources to ensure reliability and to surface consistent themes. Qualitative insights were complemented by comparative vendor capability reviews and scenario-based assessments that examine how different segmentation choices-such as offering mix, type of automation, deployment mode, organizational scale, and industry vertical-impact implementation approaches. The methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions, clear delineation between observation and interpretation, and the use of exemplars to illustrate effective patterns. Throughout, the analysis prioritizes actionable intelligence that leaders can use to inform strategy, procurement, and operational design without relying on proprietary or undisclosed data.
A strategic synthesis of how integrated security practices, policy-driven automation, and resilient sourcing collectively enable sustainable innovation and enterprise risk reduction
The conclusion synthesizes the report’s core messages and highlights the imperative for leadership to adopt integrated, automated, and measurable approaches to secure software delivery. Organizations that successfully embed security into development lifecycles balance developer productivity with robust governance, leverage policy-as-code and infrastructure-as-code to produce verifiable controls, and adopt platform-focused enablement to scale best practices across teams. These changes require not only technology investments but also adjustments to organizational structures, incentives, and metrics that align security outcomes with business objectives.
Looking forward, resilience will be defined by an organization’s ability to adapt to regulatory shifts, supply chain dynamics, and evolving threat vectors while preserving the pace of innovation. Decision-makers should therefore focus on building modular, interoperable architectures; investing in observable controls that provide continuous assurance; and strengthening supplier and deployment diversity to mitigate external risks. By doing so, enterprises can transform security from a gating function into a strategic enabler that protects value, supports growth, and sustains customer trust.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
180 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of policy-as-code frameworks for automated security governance across multicloud environments
- 5.2. Integration of AI-powered vulnerability detection within CI/CD pipelines for proactive risk mitigation
- 5.3. Implementation of SBOM-driven software supply chain security to address emerging compliance mandates
- 5.4. Shift-left application of runtime container protection using eBPF and service mesh observability tools
- 5.5. Orchestration of automated threat modeling and compliance checks in development workflows with git hooks
- 5.6. Use of security chaos engineering experiments to validate resilience of microservices in production environments
- 5.7. Integration of human-centric DevSecOps training platforms with gamified learning paths for developer adoption
- 5.8. Enterprise adoption of unified DevSecOps platforms that consolidate code scanning, secrets management, and runtime telemetry across hybrid cloud environments
- 5.9. Increasing integration of cloud-native runtime detection with application-aware microsegmentation to reduce blast radius of compromised workloads
- 5.10. Rising adoption of cryptographic signing, provenance attestations, and reproducible builds to strengthen trust in software supply chain artifacts
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. DevSecOps Market, by Offering
- 8.1. Services
- 8.1.1. Managed Services
- 8.1.2. Professional Services
- 8.2. Solutions
- 8.2.1. Application Security Testing
- 8.2.2. Cloud Security & Compliance
- 8.2.3. Container & Microservices Security
- 8.2.4. Identity & Access Management (IAM)
- 8.2.5. Incident Detection & Response
- 8.2.6. Secure Software Development
- 9. DevSecOps Market, by Type
- 9.1. Compliance as Code
- 9.2. Infrastructure as Code
- 9.3. Policy as Code
- 9.4. Security as Code
- 10. DevSecOps Market, by Deployment Mode
- 10.1. Cloud
- 10.2. On-Premises
- 11. DevSecOps Market, by Organization Size
- 11.1. Large Enterprises
- 11.2. Small & Medium-Sized Enterprises
- 12. DevSecOps Market, by Industry Vertical
- 12.1. Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance
- 12.2. Education
- 12.3. Energy & Utilities
- 12.4. Government & Public Sector
- 12.5. Healthcare & Life Sciences
- 12.6. IT & Telecom
- 12.7. Manufacturing
- 12.8. Media & Entertainment
- 12.9. Retail & E-commerce
- 13. DevSecOps Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. DevSecOps Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. DevSecOps Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
- 16.3.2. Google by Alphabet Inc.
- 16.3.3. 4ARMED Limited
- 16.3.4. Aqua Security Software Ltd
- 16.3.5. Broadcom Inc.
- 16.3.6. Checkmarx Ltd.
- 16.3.7. Contrast Security, Inc.
- 16.3.8. Copado, Inc
- 16.3.9. CYBERARK SOFTWARE LTD
- 16.3.10. Entersoft Information Systems Pvt Ltd.
- 16.3.11. Gitlab Inc.
- 16.3.12. International Business Machines Corporation
- 16.3.13. Microsoft Corporation
- 16.3.14. OpenText Corporation
- 16.3.15. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
- 16.3.16. Progress Software Corporation
- 16.3.17. Qualys, Inc.
- 16.3.18. Rapid7, Inc.
- 16.3.19. Snyk Limited
- 16.3.20. Sonatype Inc.
- 16.3.21. Synopsys, Inc.
- 16.3.22. Tenable, Inc.
- 16.3.23. Trend Micro Incorporated
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
