DevOps Market by Organization Size (Large Enterprises, Small And Medium Enterprises), Deployment Mode (Cloud, On Premises), Service Type, Industry, Component - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The DevOps Market was valued at USD 11.62 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 12.95 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 13.39%, reaching USD 31.77 billion by 2032.
Concise orientation to the research purpose and strategic lens that bridges engineering practices, risk management, and enterprise decision-making for DevOps leaders
The introduction frames why this body of research matters to organizations navigating modern software delivery and infrastructure operations. In an era where continuous delivery, cross-functional collaboration, and cloud-native architectures dictate competitive advantage, leaders must reconcile rapid feature velocity with operational resilience and regulatory obligations. This summary synthesizes the key forces shaping how engineering, security, and business stakeholders align around DevOps priorities, translating technical trends into governance and investment imperatives.
Readers will find a concise synthesis of structural shifts in toolchains, the evolving vendor landscape, and the integration points that determine time-to-value for automation investments. The analysis highlights how organizations of different scales and sectors recalibrate organizational design, skills, and procurement practices to accelerate digital initiatives while managing risk. It also identifies the necessary shift from point solutions toward platform thinking, where observability, security, and orchestration cohere into repeatable delivery patterns.
Finally, the introduction situates the report’s methodology and scope, clarifying the analytic lens applied to product categories, deployment approaches, and service models. This sets expectations for how insights should be operationalized by technology leaders, procurement officers, and C-suite sponsors seeking pragmatic, evidence-based next steps.
How cloud-native architectures, platform engineering, automation, and integrated security are redefining software delivery and operational governance across enterprises
Transformative shifts in the DevOps landscape have accelerated as organizations adopt cloud-first strategies and embrace automation to sustain competitive differentiation. The maturation of container orchestration and the standardization of CI/CD pipelines have enabled teams to iterate faster, yet this velocity has introduced new operational and security complexities that require holistic governance. As a result, engineering organizations increasingly prioritize platform engineering and developer experience to reduce cognitive load and increase deployment throughput while retaining control over cost and compliance.
Simultaneously, the service delivery model has diversified: managed services and professional services now play complementary roles in helping organizations bridge talent gaps and operationalize modern toolchains. This shift underscores the importance of collaboration between in-house teams and external partners to implement resilient, repeatable practices. Moreover, the integration of advanced monitoring and analytics into every stage of the delivery pipeline has transformed incident response and capacity planning into continuous feedback mechanisms rather than periodic exercises.
Finally, security and compliance are no longer afterthoughts; they are embedded across development lifecycles through policy-as-code, automated scanning, and runtime protections. These changes collectively require cross-functional governance, sustained investment in upskilling, and an emphasis on measurable operational outcomes over one-off technology experiments.
Assessment of how 2025 trade policy shifts and tariff actions reshaped procurement, infrastructure choices, supplier diversification, and operational resilience strategies in DevOps
The introduction of tariffs and trade-related policy dynamics in 2025 has created layered implications for the technology supply chain that ripple through DevOps practices. Hardware-dependent components of modern infrastructure, including on-premises servers, specialized networking gear, and certain accelerator chips, have seen cost and procurement shifts that compel organizations to reassess deployment strategies. In turn, many engineering teams accelerated cloud adoption or re-architected workloads to reduce exposure to hardware procurement cycles and import-related delays, thereby prioritizing portability and infrastructure-as-code practices.
Beyond hardware, tariffs influence software-related procurement indirectly by altering vendor pricing models and the cost basis for managed services that rely on hardware provisioning. Service providers with geographically distributed supply chains responded by optimizing regional sourcing and by expanding partnerships with local providers to maintain service continuity. As a consequence, organizations rebalanced their deployment mix between cloud and on-premises options while emphasizing vendor diversity to mitigate concentration risk.
Operationally, the tariffs environment reinforced the strategic value of automation: teams invested in stronger CI/CD practices, container portability, and orchestration to reduce the lead time required to replatform applications. Regulatory compliance and contractual protections took on increased importance, prompting tighter supplier risk management and contractual clauses addressing supply chain disruptions. In summary, the tariffs landscape of 2025 catalyzed a pragmatic shift toward resilience, portability, and supplier diversification across DevOps ecosystems.
In-depth segmentation analysis highlighting how organization size, deployment modes, service types, industry verticals, and component-level choices define distinct DevOps priorities and operational paths
Segmentation-driven analysis reveals nuanced differences in priorities and capability maturity across organizational contexts. Based on organization size, large enterprises typically operate complex, heterogeneous environments with emphasis on governance, scalability, and vendor management, while small and medium enterprises often prioritize rapid time-to-market, cost predictability, and managed services to compensate for leaner internal teams. These distinctions influence tooling choices, investment cadence, and the balance between in-house and outsourced responsibilities.
Based on deployment mode, cloud-first deployments accelerate adoption of container management, orchestration, and cloud-native monitoring, whereas on-premises deployments emphasize control, data residency, and tailored security controls; many organizations pursue hybrid architectures to capture the strengths of both approaches. Based on service type, managed services provide operational continuity and accelerated adoption for organizations lacking deep platform teams, while professional services deliver transformation-led capabilities such as custom integrations, migration planning, and change management that build long-term internal competence.
Based on industry, sectors with stringent regulatory and data sovereignty requirements-such as BFSI, government and defense, and healthcare-place higher priority on compliance, auditability, and secure configuration management. Industries like IT and telecom, manufacturing, and retail e-commerce emphasize scale, latency optimization, and rapid feature delivery to meet competitive pressures and consumer demand. Based on component, portfolios organized around collaboration and planning, configuration management, container management, continuous delivery, continuous integration, monitoring and analytics, orchestration and automation, and security and compliance reveal that critical modules such as configuration management, container management, continuous delivery, continuous integration, monitoring and analytics, orchestration and automation, and security and compliance all exhibit pathway-specific differences when deployed in cloud versus on-premises environments, underscoring the need for cohesive cross-component strategies that address interoperability, observability, and lifecycle governance.
Regional dynamics and operational considerations across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence procurement, compliance, talent, and deployment approaches
Regional dynamics shape procurement options, talent availability, and regulatory constraints that inform DevOps strategy. In the Americas, a strong cloud ecosystem, mature managed services market, and large enterprise demand drive rapid adoption of platform engineering and advanced observability, while regulatory focus on data privacy and cross-border flows encourages hybrid deployments and contractual diligence. Organizations in this region often lead in integrating CI/CD with security automation and in leveraging commercial toolchains to accelerate enterprise transformation.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity and a diverse vendor landscape require careful orchestration of compliance, data residency, and sovereign cloud options. Public sector and highly regulated industries in these territories emphasize secure configuration and audit-ready pipelines, leading to broader adoption of policy-as-code and formalized change control processes. Talent distribution and language considerations also influence how service providers structure delivery models and localized support.
In Asia-Pacific, fast-growing digital economies combine aggressive cloud adoption with a strong emphasis on cost-effective scale and low-latency architectures. Regional data centers and localized partners play a pivotal role in enabling container-based deployments and managed orchestration services. Across this region, organizations balance speed of innovation with varying regulatory regimes, resulting in pragmatic hybrid approaches that prioritize portability and operational resilience.
Company-level positioning where integrated platforms, outcome-driven managed services, and interoperability-focused vendors shape procurement and operational adoption decisions
Leading companies in the DevOps ecosystem are differentiating through integrated platform offerings, deeper services portfolios, and investments in developer experience. Vendors that combine orchestration, monitoring, and security into coherent platforms help enterprises reduce integration friction and accelerate time-to-value. Meanwhile, managed service providers that offer outcome-oriented contracts and clear operational SLAs gain traction with organizations seeking predictable operations without scaling internal headcount at the same pace.
Consulting and professional services firms play a crucial role in large-scale migrations and the adoption of platform engineering, providing methodology, change management, and upskilling that translate technical capability into sustained operational improvements. Security-focused vendors that embed compliance workflows and runtime protections across CI/CD pipelines are increasingly important as organizations confront sophisticated supply chain threats and regulatory scrutiny.
Ecosystem players that prioritize interoperability, open standards, and extensibility position themselves well for enterprise adoption, as customers look for solutions that integrate with existing investments. Strategic partnerships between infrastructure providers, tooling vendors, and services firms create bundled offerings that address both tactical needs and long-term governance requirements, enabling buyers to choose pragmatic paths tailored to their operational maturity and risk tolerance.
Practical strategic steps recommended for leaders to institutionalize platform engineering, supplier diversification, automation of compliance, and resilience testing for sustained delivery performance
Industry leaders should prioritize platform thinking that centralizes common services while preserving developer autonomy. Invest in a platform engineering approach that standardizes pipelines, templates, and observability patterns to reduce duplication and accelerate onboarding of new applications. Pair this with a targeted upskilling program that builds cloud-native competencies, security-by-design practices, and infrastructure-as-code expertise across development and operations teams to sustain the transition.
Adopt a supplier diversification strategy that reduces concentration risk by combining multi-cloud portability, regional partners, and selective on-premises investments for sensitive workloads. Operationally, enforce policy-as-code and automated compliance checks early in the delivery pipeline to shift left on security and governance. Complement these measures with clear SLAs and outcome-based engagements for managed services to align external partners with internal performance objectives.
Finally, incorporate scenario planning and tabletop exercises that stress-test supply chain disruptions, tariff-induced procurement delays, and regulatory changes. Use these exercises to validate contingency architectures, improve incident response, and refine contractual protections. By implementing these recommendations, leaders can balance innovation speed with operational resilience and sustained regulatory compliance.
Transparent research approach using primary stakeholder interviews, vendor briefings, secondary policy analysis, and triangulation to produce replicable, actionable insights for practitioners
The research methodology combines primary interviews, vendor briefings, and quantitative data collection to build a robust, triangulated view of the DevOps ecosystem. Primary research included structured conversations with technology leaders, platform engineers, and procurement professionals across multiple industries to surface real-world constraints, adoption patterns, and priority use cases. These qualitative inputs were synthesized with vendor documentation and product roadmaps to understand capability trajectories and integration approaches.
Secondary research examined regulatory updates, trade policy announcements, and industry reports to contextualize operational considerations such as data residency, tariffs, and regional sourcing. Data triangulation techniques validated themes across multiple sources, ensuring that insights reflect recurring patterns rather than isolated anecdotes. Segment definitions were applied consistently across organization size, deployment mode, service type, industry verticals, and component categories to enable comparable analysis.
Where appropriate, scenario analysis and sensitivity checks explored how variations in procurement, talent availability, and regulatory pressure affect implementation choices. The resulting methodology emphasizes transparency, repeatability, and practical relevance for decision-makers seeking to apply the findings to strategic planning and tactical execution.
Summative conclusions on aligning platform initiatives, automation-first compliance, and supplier strategies to balance velocity, resilience, and regulatory obligations in software delivery
In conclusion, the DevOps landscape is advancing from fragmented toolchains toward integrated platforms that support rapid delivery while enforcing governance and security. Organizations that embrace platform engineering, prioritize automation of compliance, and invest in supplier diversification will be better positioned to manage operational risk and sustain velocity. The tariff-driven dynamics of 2025 highlighted the importance of portability, regional sourcing strategies, and contractual resilience in maintaining service continuity.
Practically, the most effective transformations couple technology choices with organizational change: clear operating models, role definitions, and continuous learning programs are essential to realize the full value of modern toolchains. Managed services and professional services will continue to play a critical role for organizations that need to accelerate capability adoption without compromising stability. Ultimately, strategic choices should be guided by a balance between speed, cost, and regulatory requirements, with observability and security embedded across the delivery lifecycle.
This synthesis should help leaders prioritize near-term actions and longer-term investments that build operational resilience, improve developer productivity, and reduce systemic risk across distributed delivery environments.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Concise orientation to the research purpose and strategic lens that bridges engineering practices, risk management, and enterprise decision-making for DevOps leaders
The introduction frames why this body of research matters to organizations navigating modern software delivery and infrastructure operations. In an era where continuous delivery, cross-functional collaboration, and cloud-native architectures dictate competitive advantage, leaders must reconcile rapid feature velocity with operational resilience and regulatory obligations. This summary synthesizes the key forces shaping how engineering, security, and business stakeholders align around DevOps priorities, translating technical trends into governance and investment imperatives.
Readers will find a concise synthesis of structural shifts in toolchains, the evolving vendor landscape, and the integration points that determine time-to-value for automation investments. The analysis highlights how organizations of different scales and sectors recalibrate organizational design, skills, and procurement practices to accelerate digital initiatives while managing risk. It also identifies the necessary shift from point solutions toward platform thinking, where observability, security, and orchestration cohere into repeatable delivery patterns.
Finally, the introduction situates the report’s methodology and scope, clarifying the analytic lens applied to product categories, deployment approaches, and service models. This sets expectations for how insights should be operationalized by technology leaders, procurement officers, and C-suite sponsors seeking pragmatic, evidence-based next steps.
How cloud-native architectures, platform engineering, automation, and integrated security are redefining software delivery and operational governance across enterprises
Transformative shifts in the DevOps landscape have accelerated as organizations adopt cloud-first strategies and embrace automation to sustain competitive differentiation. The maturation of container orchestration and the standardization of CI/CD pipelines have enabled teams to iterate faster, yet this velocity has introduced new operational and security complexities that require holistic governance. As a result, engineering organizations increasingly prioritize platform engineering and developer experience to reduce cognitive load and increase deployment throughput while retaining control over cost and compliance.
Simultaneously, the service delivery model has diversified: managed services and professional services now play complementary roles in helping organizations bridge talent gaps and operationalize modern toolchains. This shift underscores the importance of collaboration between in-house teams and external partners to implement resilient, repeatable practices. Moreover, the integration of advanced monitoring and analytics into every stage of the delivery pipeline has transformed incident response and capacity planning into continuous feedback mechanisms rather than periodic exercises.
Finally, security and compliance are no longer afterthoughts; they are embedded across development lifecycles through policy-as-code, automated scanning, and runtime protections. These changes collectively require cross-functional governance, sustained investment in upskilling, and an emphasis on measurable operational outcomes over one-off technology experiments.
Assessment of how 2025 trade policy shifts and tariff actions reshaped procurement, infrastructure choices, supplier diversification, and operational resilience strategies in DevOps
The introduction of tariffs and trade-related policy dynamics in 2025 has created layered implications for the technology supply chain that ripple through DevOps practices. Hardware-dependent components of modern infrastructure, including on-premises servers, specialized networking gear, and certain accelerator chips, have seen cost and procurement shifts that compel organizations to reassess deployment strategies. In turn, many engineering teams accelerated cloud adoption or re-architected workloads to reduce exposure to hardware procurement cycles and import-related delays, thereby prioritizing portability and infrastructure-as-code practices.
Beyond hardware, tariffs influence software-related procurement indirectly by altering vendor pricing models and the cost basis for managed services that rely on hardware provisioning. Service providers with geographically distributed supply chains responded by optimizing regional sourcing and by expanding partnerships with local providers to maintain service continuity. As a consequence, organizations rebalanced their deployment mix between cloud and on-premises options while emphasizing vendor diversity to mitigate concentration risk.
Operationally, the tariffs environment reinforced the strategic value of automation: teams invested in stronger CI/CD practices, container portability, and orchestration to reduce the lead time required to replatform applications. Regulatory compliance and contractual protections took on increased importance, prompting tighter supplier risk management and contractual clauses addressing supply chain disruptions. In summary, the tariffs landscape of 2025 catalyzed a pragmatic shift toward resilience, portability, and supplier diversification across DevOps ecosystems.
In-depth segmentation analysis highlighting how organization size, deployment modes, service types, industry verticals, and component-level choices define distinct DevOps priorities and operational paths
Segmentation-driven analysis reveals nuanced differences in priorities and capability maturity across organizational contexts. Based on organization size, large enterprises typically operate complex, heterogeneous environments with emphasis on governance, scalability, and vendor management, while small and medium enterprises often prioritize rapid time-to-market, cost predictability, and managed services to compensate for leaner internal teams. These distinctions influence tooling choices, investment cadence, and the balance between in-house and outsourced responsibilities.
Based on deployment mode, cloud-first deployments accelerate adoption of container management, orchestration, and cloud-native monitoring, whereas on-premises deployments emphasize control, data residency, and tailored security controls; many organizations pursue hybrid architectures to capture the strengths of both approaches. Based on service type, managed services provide operational continuity and accelerated adoption for organizations lacking deep platform teams, while professional services deliver transformation-led capabilities such as custom integrations, migration planning, and change management that build long-term internal competence.
Based on industry, sectors with stringent regulatory and data sovereignty requirements-such as BFSI, government and defense, and healthcare-place higher priority on compliance, auditability, and secure configuration management. Industries like IT and telecom, manufacturing, and retail e-commerce emphasize scale, latency optimization, and rapid feature delivery to meet competitive pressures and consumer demand. Based on component, portfolios organized around collaboration and planning, configuration management, container management, continuous delivery, continuous integration, monitoring and analytics, orchestration and automation, and security and compliance reveal that critical modules such as configuration management, container management, continuous delivery, continuous integration, monitoring and analytics, orchestration and automation, and security and compliance all exhibit pathway-specific differences when deployed in cloud versus on-premises environments, underscoring the need for cohesive cross-component strategies that address interoperability, observability, and lifecycle governance.
Regional dynamics and operational considerations across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence procurement, compliance, talent, and deployment approaches
Regional dynamics shape procurement options, talent availability, and regulatory constraints that inform DevOps strategy. In the Americas, a strong cloud ecosystem, mature managed services market, and large enterprise demand drive rapid adoption of platform engineering and advanced observability, while regulatory focus on data privacy and cross-border flows encourages hybrid deployments and contractual diligence. Organizations in this region often lead in integrating CI/CD with security automation and in leveraging commercial toolchains to accelerate enterprise transformation.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity and a diverse vendor landscape require careful orchestration of compliance, data residency, and sovereign cloud options. Public sector and highly regulated industries in these territories emphasize secure configuration and audit-ready pipelines, leading to broader adoption of policy-as-code and formalized change control processes. Talent distribution and language considerations also influence how service providers structure delivery models and localized support.
In Asia-Pacific, fast-growing digital economies combine aggressive cloud adoption with a strong emphasis on cost-effective scale and low-latency architectures. Regional data centers and localized partners play a pivotal role in enabling container-based deployments and managed orchestration services. Across this region, organizations balance speed of innovation with varying regulatory regimes, resulting in pragmatic hybrid approaches that prioritize portability and operational resilience.
Company-level positioning where integrated platforms, outcome-driven managed services, and interoperability-focused vendors shape procurement and operational adoption decisions
Leading companies in the DevOps ecosystem are differentiating through integrated platform offerings, deeper services portfolios, and investments in developer experience. Vendors that combine orchestration, monitoring, and security into coherent platforms help enterprises reduce integration friction and accelerate time-to-value. Meanwhile, managed service providers that offer outcome-oriented contracts and clear operational SLAs gain traction with organizations seeking predictable operations without scaling internal headcount at the same pace.
Consulting and professional services firms play a crucial role in large-scale migrations and the adoption of platform engineering, providing methodology, change management, and upskilling that translate technical capability into sustained operational improvements. Security-focused vendors that embed compliance workflows and runtime protections across CI/CD pipelines are increasingly important as organizations confront sophisticated supply chain threats and regulatory scrutiny.
Ecosystem players that prioritize interoperability, open standards, and extensibility position themselves well for enterprise adoption, as customers look for solutions that integrate with existing investments. Strategic partnerships between infrastructure providers, tooling vendors, and services firms create bundled offerings that address both tactical needs and long-term governance requirements, enabling buyers to choose pragmatic paths tailored to their operational maturity and risk tolerance.
Practical strategic steps recommended for leaders to institutionalize platform engineering, supplier diversification, automation of compliance, and resilience testing for sustained delivery performance
Industry leaders should prioritize platform thinking that centralizes common services while preserving developer autonomy. Invest in a platform engineering approach that standardizes pipelines, templates, and observability patterns to reduce duplication and accelerate onboarding of new applications. Pair this with a targeted upskilling program that builds cloud-native competencies, security-by-design practices, and infrastructure-as-code expertise across development and operations teams to sustain the transition.
Adopt a supplier diversification strategy that reduces concentration risk by combining multi-cloud portability, regional partners, and selective on-premises investments for sensitive workloads. Operationally, enforce policy-as-code and automated compliance checks early in the delivery pipeline to shift left on security and governance. Complement these measures with clear SLAs and outcome-based engagements for managed services to align external partners with internal performance objectives.
Finally, incorporate scenario planning and tabletop exercises that stress-test supply chain disruptions, tariff-induced procurement delays, and regulatory changes. Use these exercises to validate contingency architectures, improve incident response, and refine contractual protections. By implementing these recommendations, leaders can balance innovation speed with operational resilience and sustained regulatory compliance.
Transparent research approach using primary stakeholder interviews, vendor briefings, secondary policy analysis, and triangulation to produce replicable, actionable insights for practitioners
The research methodology combines primary interviews, vendor briefings, and quantitative data collection to build a robust, triangulated view of the DevOps ecosystem. Primary research included structured conversations with technology leaders, platform engineers, and procurement professionals across multiple industries to surface real-world constraints, adoption patterns, and priority use cases. These qualitative inputs were synthesized with vendor documentation and product roadmaps to understand capability trajectories and integration approaches.
Secondary research examined regulatory updates, trade policy announcements, and industry reports to contextualize operational considerations such as data residency, tariffs, and regional sourcing. Data triangulation techniques validated themes across multiple sources, ensuring that insights reflect recurring patterns rather than isolated anecdotes. Segment definitions were applied consistently across organization size, deployment mode, service type, industry verticals, and component categories to enable comparable analysis.
Where appropriate, scenario analysis and sensitivity checks explored how variations in procurement, talent availability, and regulatory pressure affect implementation choices. The resulting methodology emphasizes transparency, repeatability, and practical relevance for decision-makers seeking to apply the findings to strategic planning and tactical execution.
Summative conclusions on aligning platform initiatives, automation-first compliance, and supplier strategies to balance velocity, resilience, and regulatory obligations in software delivery
In conclusion, the DevOps landscape is advancing from fragmented toolchains toward integrated platforms that support rapid delivery while enforcing governance and security. Organizations that embrace platform engineering, prioritize automation of compliance, and invest in supplier diversification will be better positioned to manage operational risk and sustain velocity. The tariff-driven dynamics of 2025 highlighted the importance of portability, regional sourcing strategies, and contractual resilience in maintaining service continuity.
Practically, the most effective transformations couple technology choices with organizational change: clear operating models, role definitions, and continuous learning programs are essential to realize the full value of modern toolchains. Managed services and professional services will continue to play a critical role for organizations that need to accelerate capability adoption without compromising stability. Ultimately, strategic choices should be guided by a balance between speed, cost, and regulatory requirements, with observability and security embedded across the delivery lifecycle.
This synthesis should help leaders prioritize near-term actions and longer-term investments that build operational resilience, improve developer productivity, and reduce systemic risk across distributed delivery environments.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
194 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-driven observability platforms to enhance real-time system monitoring and incident response
- 5.2. Adoption of GitOps methodologies for declarative infrastructure management across multi-cloud environments
- 5.3. Increasing demand for platform engineering teams to streamline developer self-service and toolchain automation
- 5.4. Growth of security-first DevSecOps practices embedding automated security checks into CI/CD pipelines
- 5.5. Emergence of low-code/no-code automation tools enabling faster pipeline creation for business stakeholders
- 5.6. Rise of FinOps integration within DevOps workflows to optimize cloud cost management and governance
- 5.7. Expansion of edge computing DevOps strategies for efficient deployment and management of distributed IoT applications
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. DevOps Market, by Organization Size
- 8.1. Large Enterprises
- 8.2. Small And Medium Enterprises
- 9. DevOps Market, by Deployment Mode
- 9.1. Cloud
- 9.2. On Premises
- 10. DevOps Market, by Service Type
- 10.1. Managed Services
- 10.2. Professional Services
- 11. DevOps Market, by Industry
- 11.1. Bfsi
- 11.2. Energy Utilities
- 11.3. Government And Defense
- 11.4. Healthcare
- 11.5. It And Telecom
- 11.6. Manufacturing
- 11.7. Retail Ecommerce
- 12. DevOps Market, by Component
- 12.1. Collaboration And Planning
- 12.2. Configuration Management
- 12.2.1. Cloud
- 12.2.2. On Premises
- 12.3. Container Management
- 12.3.1. Cloud
- 12.3.2. On Premises
- 12.4. Continuous Delivery
- 12.4.1. Cloud
- 12.4.2. On Premises
- 12.5. Continuous Integration
- 12.5.1. Cloud
- 12.5.2. On Premises
- 12.6. Monitoring And Analytics
- 12.6.1. Cloud
- 12.6.2. On Premises
- 12.7. Orchestration And Automation
- 12.7.1. Cloud
- 12.7.2. On Premises
- 12.8. Security And Compliance
- 12.8.1. Cloud
- 12.8.2. On Premises
- 13. DevOps Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. DevOps Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. DevOps Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
- 16.3.2. Microsoft Corporation
- 16.3.3. International Business Machines Corporation
- 16.3.4. Google LLC
- 16.3.5. Atlassian Corporation Plc
- 16.3.6. Broadcom Inc.
- 16.3.7. GitLab Inc.
- 16.3.8. Red Hat, Inc.
- 16.3.9. HashiCorp, Inc.
- 16.3.10. CloudBees, Inc.
- 16.3.11. Docker, Inc.
- 16.3.12. Micro Focus International plc
- 16.3.13. BMC Software, Inc.
- 16.3.14. Splunk Inc.
- 16.3.15. Datadog, Inc.
- 16.3.16. New Relic, Inc.
- 16.3.17. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 16.3.18. Huawei Cloud
- 16.3.19. SaltStack, Inc.
- 16.3.20. Oracle Corporation
- 16.3.21. Circle Internet Services, Inc.
- 16.3.22. Inedo LLC
- 16.3.23. Buildkite Pty Ltd
- 16.3.24. DBmaestro Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
