Desalination Technologies Market by Technology (Reverse Osmosis, Thermal), Source Water (Brackish Water, Seawater, Wastewater), Plant Capacity, Configuration, Application - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Desalination Technologies Market was valued at USD 15.72 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 16.49 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.51%, reaching USD 22.89 billion by 2032.
Framing the contemporary desalination landscape through energy efficiency, deployment modalities, and strategic priorities that define near-term industry trajectories
The following executive summary synthesizes the most consequential developments shaping desalination technologies and their commercial deployment. It frames the current landscape through the lenses of technological innovation, regulatory dynamics, and shifting supply chain realities, and it emphasizes the strategic implications for operators, investors, and policy stakeholders. The narrative prioritizes clarity and immediacy so readers can rapidly assimilate the forces that will determine competitive advantage over the next several years.
The introduction establishes the context for subsequent sections by describing how decreasing energy intensity, advances in membrane and thermal engineering, and heightened attention to lifecycle environmental performance have collectively raised desalination from a niche contingency to a core water resource solution in water-stressed and industrially intensive regions. Early-stage companies and established system integrators alike are responding to demand for modular, lower-carbon solutions, while procurement and financing practices are adapting to accommodate longer-term service contracts and performance-based outcomes. Altogether, this section sets the stage for a focused appraisal of transformation drivers, tariff effects, segmentation nuance, regional contrasts, and strategic responses.
How material advances in membranes, energy integration, digital operations, and modular deployment are reshaping desalination project economics and delivery timelines
The desalination sector is experiencing a wave of transformative shifts that are redefining what projects look like, how they are financed, and where they are deployed. Advances in membrane chemistry and manufacturing are reducing fouling rates and extending element life, which, in turn, lowers operating intensity and total cost of ownership. Simultaneously, integration with renewable power generation and energy recovery systems is making previously cost-prohibitive projects more viable, particularly when electricity prices and grid emissions profiles are taken into account.
Digitalization and remote monitoring have matured from pilot programs into operational necessities, enabling predictive maintenance and performance-based contracting that shift operational risk away from owners and toward technology providers. Modularization and factory-built plants are accelerating project delivery cycles and enabling incremental capacity additions, while offshore and floating configurations are attracting attention for coastal cities and island nations seeking to minimize land-use conflicts. Regulatory emphasis on brine management, circular water use, and lifecycle carbon accounting is encouraging closed-loop and hybrid designs. Taken together, these shifts are creating a more flexible, lower-carbon, and risk-managed industry capable of addressing diverse water security challenges.
Understanding the multi-dimensional effects of United States tariff policy changes on procurement strategies, supplier footprints, and contractual risk allocation in desalination projects
United States tariff changes announced for 2025 have introduced multifaceted implications across procurement, supply chain resilience, and cost pass-through dynamics for desalination projects. Tariff adjustments affect the price competitiveness of imported membranes, pressure vessels, pumps, and specialty alloys, and they alter sourcing strategies for multinational system suppliers. As a consequence, procurement teams are re-evaluating supplier footprints and inventory strategies to dampen exposure to tariff volatility while maintaining project schedules.
In response, many developers and EPC contractors are diversifying supplier bases and increasing domestic sourcing where feasible, even as lead times for alternative components expand. The tariffs also influence the structure of long-term service agreements by raising the importance of fixed-price clauses, early supplier engagement, and hedging strategies for critical commodities. For investors, tariff-driven cost uncertainty elevates the value of flexible contracting and phased deployment approaches that allow capacity to be added when input costs stabilize. Crucially, regulatory shifts in trade policy underscore the need for scenario planning, contract reopener clauses, and a heightened focus on total lifecycle costs rather than headline capital estimates, so stakeholders can maintain momentum on essential projects despite a more complex international trade environment.
Analytical segmentation insight explaining how technology, source water, plant capacity tiers, configuration choices, and application profiles jointly determine project evaluation criteria
Segment-level dynamics reveal where technology choices, feed water characteristics, scale, and configuration converge to determine project viability and performance objectives. When technologies are compared, reverse osmosis continues to dominate when energy efficiency and modular scalability are primary considerations, while thermal solutions-encompassing mechanical vapor compression, multi-effect distillation, and multi-stage flash-retain relevance for high-salinity streams and certain industrial heat integration scenarios. Selecting between membrane and thermal approaches requires careful alignment of feed water chemistry, available waste heat, and long-term operating budgets.
Source water categories-brackish water, seawater, and wastewater-each demand tailored pretreatment, material selection, and brine handling strategies that drive differential operating risk and maintenance regimes. Plant capacity tiers, from small units up to 1,000 cubic meters per day, through mid-range systems of 1,000 to 5,000 cubic meters per day, to larger facilities exceeding 5,000 cubic meters per day, influence the balance between capital intensity and economies of scale, with mid-to-large plants often leveraging advanced energy recovery to optimize operating expenditure. Configuration choices between land-based and offshore deployments affect permitting timelines, footprint constraints, and access to coastal or industrial heat sources; offshore options include floating and ship-based arrangements that present distinct installation and maintenance logistics. Application areas such as agricultural uses-further divided into irrigation and livestock-commercial operations, industrial sectors including chemical processing, oil and gas, and power generation, and municipal supply define water quality targets, reliability expectations, and revenue models, guiding both technology selection and service delivery formats.
Comparative regional analysis showing how distinct regulatory environments, resource constraints, and industrial demand shape desalination project priorities and execution strategies
Regional considerations are central to project design, regulatory compliance, and financing pathways, and the comparative landscape reveals distinct drivers and constraints across the principal geographies. In the Americas, project development often emphasizes municipal and industrial demand centers with an increasing focus on integrating renewable energy and addressing aging water infrastructure through retrofit and augmentation strategies. Regulatory frameworks and financing mechanisms in the region shape procurement models that favor performance guarantees and long-term service arrangements.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a diverse set of drivers: intense water scarcity and strategic desalination programs in some nations coexist with stringent environmental regulations and public scrutiny of brine discharge practices. Investors and technology providers in these markets must navigate complex permitting regimes while offering robust environmental mitigation and circularity solutions. Asia-Pacific demonstrates particularly rapid adoption of a wide range of configurations, driven by urbanization, industrial growth, and island-state vulnerability. Here, modular construction, offshore options, and localized manufacturing are accelerating deployment, while regional supply chains and trade policies influence sourcing strategies and cost structures. Across all regions, the interplay between policy objectives, resource endowments, and industrial demand patterns shapes which desalination approaches are prioritized and how projects are financed and executed.
How market participants capture advantage by combining technological differentiation, integrated service models, supply chain resilience, and long-term operational capabilities
Competitive dynamics in the desalination space are evolving from equipment-centric competition toward integrated service models that combine technology, operations, and financing. Leading participants differentiate through advanced R&D capabilities in membranes and thermal processes, proprietary energy recovery systems, and digital platforms for performance optimization. Strategic partnerships and ecosystem plays are emerging as common routes to scale, with technology licensors, EPC firms, and specialist operators aligning capabilities to deliver turnkey solutions and long-term service agreements.
Supply chain integration, domestic manufacturing presence, and aftermarket service networks are increasingly decisive in bid evaluations, particularly where tariff exposure or logistical complexity elevates delivery risk. Companies that demonstrate credible lifecycle performance data, robust brine management solutions, and a clear pathway to decarbonization tend to secure premium positions in procurement competitions. At the same time, nimble entrants that offer modular, factory-built plants or niche process innovations can capture opportunities in smaller scale or specialized industrial applications. Overall, competitive advantage accrues to organizations that combine technical differentiation with flexible commercial models and an ability to partner across financing, construction, and long-term operations.
Practical strategic moves for senior executives to strengthen technology adoption, supply chain agility, contractual risk mitigation, and environmental performance across desalination portfolios
Industry leaders should pursue a strategy that balances technological investment, supply chain resilience, and contract design to secure favorable outcomes amid evolving policy and commercial realities. Prioritize investments in energy-efficient membranes and recovery technologies while accelerating pilots that integrate renewables and waste-heat sources to reduce operating exposure to grid volatility. Simultaneously, implement digital monitoring and performance analytics across portfolios to enable predictive maintenance and to support outcome-based contracting structures that align incentives between owners and providers.
From a procurement standpoint, diversify supplier bases and consider staged procurement to manage tariff and commodity risk, while negotiating contract clauses that permit equitable adjustments for material cost shocks. Pursue partnerships with local manufacturers and service providers to shorten lead times and reduce tariff vulnerability, particularly for projects in regions with complex trade dynamics. Finally, embed environmental performance metrics-such as brine management, energy intensity, and lifecycle emissions-into technical specifications and financing covenants to enhance regulatory acceptance and to unlock sustainability-focused capital sources. These measures collectively improve project resilience, reduce total lifecycle exposure, and position organizations to capitalize on near-term demand for reliable, lower-carbon water supply.
Comprehensive mixed-method research approach combining stakeholder interviews, on-site validation, secondary technical review, and scenario-based sensitivity analysis for robust insights
The research underpinning this analysis relied on a structured methodology that combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary research included in-depth interviews with developers, EPC contractors, technology providers, utilities, and project financiers to capture contemporary perspectives on deployment barriers, cost drivers, and preferred contractual structures. These conversations were supplemented by site visits and technology demonstrations where available to validate operational claims and to observe maintenance and pretreatment practices firsthand.
Secondary research drew on a broad spectrum of publicly available technical literature, regulatory filings, engineering standards, and patent disclosures to map technological trajectories and supply chain footprints. Data triangulation techniques were applied to reconcile differing inputs, and scenario analysis was used to examine the implications of policy changes such as tariff adjustments and carbon pricing on procurement and contractual models. The methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions, and sensitivity testing was conducted on key variables to highlight risk exposures and potential mitigation strategies for practitioners and investors.
Synthesis of technological progress, trade dynamics, and strategic imperatives that together determine which desalination projects will succeed under evolving economic and regulatory pressures
In conclusion, the desalination sector is at an inflection point where technological advances, regulatory pressures, and evolving commercial models converge to create new opportunities and operational imperatives. Improvements in membrane performance and energy recovery, combined with modular construction and digital operations, lower barriers to deployment and enable more projects to meet stringent environmental and cost objectives. At the same time, geopolitical and trade-related developments, including tariff adjustments, elevate the importance of supply chain strategy and contract design in preserving project viability and investor confidence.
Stakeholders who act decisively-investing in energy-efficient technologies, diversifying supply chains, and adopting outcome-focused commercial models-will capture disproportionate benefits as demand for resilient, lower-carbon water solutions grows. Moreover, region-specific approaches that account for regulatory regimes, resource endowments, and industrial demand profiles will be essential to achieving robust project outcomes. The cumulative evidence suggests that a pragmatic balance of technological rigor, commercial flexibility, and environmental stewardship will define success in the evolving desalination landscape.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the contemporary desalination landscape through energy efficiency, deployment modalities, and strategic priorities that define near-term industry trajectories
The following executive summary synthesizes the most consequential developments shaping desalination technologies and their commercial deployment. It frames the current landscape through the lenses of technological innovation, regulatory dynamics, and shifting supply chain realities, and it emphasizes the strategic implications for operators, investors, and policy stakeholders. The narrative prioritizes clarity and immediacy so readers can rapidly assimilate the forces that will determine competitive advantage over the next several years.
The introduction establishes the context for subsequent sections by describing how decreasing energy intensity, advances in membrane and thermal engineering, and heightened attention to lifecycle environmental performance have collectively raised desalination from a niche contingency to a core water resource solution in water-stressed and industrially intensive regions. Early-stage companies and established system integrators alike are responding to demand for modular, lower-carbon solutions, while procurement and financing practices are adapting to accommodate longer-term service contracts and performance-based outcomes. Altogether, this section sets the stage for a focused appraisal of transformation drivers, tariff effects, segmentation nuance, regional contrasts, and strategic responses.
How material advances in membranes, energy integration, digital operations, and modular deployment are reshaping desalination project economics and delivery timelines
The desalination sector is experiencing a wave of transformative shifts that are redefining what projects look like, how they are financed, and where they are deployed. Advances in membrane chemistry and manufacturing are reducing fouling rates and extending element life, which, in turn, lowers operating intensity and total cost of ownership. Simultaneously, integration with renewable power generation and energy recovery systems is making previously cost-prohibitive projects more viable, particularly when electricity prices and grid emissions profiles are taken into account.
Digitalization and remote monitoring have matured from pilot programs into operational necessities, enabling predictive maintenance and performance-based contracting that shift operational risk away from owners and toward technology providers. Modularization and factory-built plants are accelerating project delivery cycles and enabling incremental capacity additions, while offshore and floating configurations are attracting attention for coastal cities and island nations seeking to minimize land-use conflicts. Regulatory emphasis on brine management, circular water use, and lifecycle carbon accounting is encouraging closed-loop and hybrid designs. Taken together, these shifts are creating a more flexible, lower-carbon, and risk-managed industry capable of addressing diverse water security challenges.
Understanding the multi-dimensional effects of United States tariff policy changes on procurement strategies, supplier footprints, and contractual risk allocation in desalination projects
United States tariff changes announced for 2025 have introduced multifaceted implications across procurement, supply chain resilience, and cost pass-through dynamics for desalination projects. Tariff adjustments affect the price competitiveness of imported membranes, pressure vessels, pumps, and specialty alloys, and they alter sourcing strategies for multinational system suppliers. As a consequence, procurement teams are re-evaluating supplier footprints and inventory strategies to dampen exposure to tariff volatility while maintaining project schedules.
In response, many developers and EPC contractors are diversifying supplier bases and increasing domestic sourcing where feasible, even as lead times for alternative components expand. The tariffs also influence the structure of long-term service agreements by raising the importance of fixed-price clauses, early supplier engagement, and hedging strategies for critical commodities. For investors, tariff-driven cost uncertainty elevates the value of flexible contracting and phased deployment approaches that allow capacity to be added when input costs stabilize. Crucially, regulatory shifts in trade policy underscore the need for scenario planning, contract reopener clauses, and a heightened focus on total lifecycle costs rather than headline capital estimates, so stakeholders can maintain momentum on essential projects despite a more complex international trade environment.
Analytical segmentation insight explaining how technology, source water, plant capacity tiers, configuration choices, and application profiles jointly determine project evaluation criteria
Segment-level dynamics reveal where technology choices, feed water characteristics, scale, and configuration converge to determine project viability and performance objectives. When technologies are compared, reverse osmosis continues to dominate when energy efficiency and modular scalability are primary considerations, while thermal solutions-encompassing mechanical vapor compression, multi-effect distillation, and multi-stage flash-retain relevance for high-salinity streams and certain industrial heat integration scenarios. Selecting between membrane and thermal approaches requires careful alignment of feed water chemistry, available waste heat, and long-term operating budgets.
Source water categories-brackish water, seawater, and wastewater-each demand tailored pretreatment, material selection, and brine handling strategies that drive differential operating risk and maintenance regimes. Plant capacity tiers, from small units up to 1,000 cubic meters per day, through mid-range systems of 1,000 to 5,000 cubic meters per day, to larger facilities exceeding 5,000 cubic meters per day, influence the balance between capital intensity and economies of scale, with mid-to-large plants often leveraging advanced energy recovery to optimize operating expenditure. Configuration choices between land-based and offshore deployments affect permitting timelines, footprint constraints, and access to coastal or industrial heat sources; offshore options include floating and ship-based arrangements that present distinct installation and maintenance logistics. Application areas such as agricultural uses-further divided into irrigation and livestock-commercial operations, industrial sectors including chemical processing, oil and gas, and power generation, and municipal supply define water quality targets, reliability expectations, and revenue models, guiding both technology selection and service delivery formats.
Comparative regional analysis showing how distinct regulatory environments, resource constraints, and industrial demand shape desalination project priorities and execution strategies
Regional considerations are central to project design, regulatory compliance, and financing pathways, and the comparative landscape reveals distinct drivers and constraints across the principal geographies. In the Americas, project development often emphasizes municipal and industrial demand centers with an increasing focus on integrating renewable energy and addressing aging water infrastructure through retrofit and augmentation strategies. Regulatory frameworks and financing mechanisms in the region shape procurement models that favor performance guarantees and long-term service arrangements.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a diverse set of drivers: intense water scarcity and strategic desalination programs in some nations coexist with stringent environmental regulations and public scrutiny of brine discharge practices. Investors and technology providers in these markets must navigate complex permitting regimes while offering robust environmental mitigation and circularity solutions. Asia-Pacific demonstrates particularly rapid adoption of a wide range of configurations, driven by urbanization, industrial growth, and island-state vulnerability. Here, modular construction, offshore options, and localized manufacturing are accelerating deployment, while regional supply chains and trade policies influence sourcing strategies and cost structures. Across all regions, the interplay between policy objectives, resource endowments, and industrial demand patterns shapes which desalination approaches are prioritized and how projects are financed and executed.
How market participants capture advantage by combining technological differentiation, integrated service models, supply chain resilience, and long-term operational capabilities
Competitive dynamics in the desalination space are evolving from equipment-centric competition toward integrated service models that combine technology, operations, and financing. Leading participants differentiate through advanced R&D capabilities in membranes and thermal processes, proprietary energy recovery systems, and digital platforms for performance optimization. Strategic partnerships and ecosystem plays are emerging as common routes to scale, with technology licensors, EPC firms, and specialist operators aligning capabilities to deliver turnkey solutions and long-term service agreements.
Supply chain integration, domestic manufacturing presence, and aftermarket service networks are increasingly decisive in bid evaluations, particularly where tariff exposure or logistical complexity elevates delivery risk. Companies that demonstrate credible lifecycle performance data, robust brine management solutions, and a clear pathway to decarbonization tend to secure premium positions in procurement competitions. At the same time, nimble entrants that offer modular, factory-built plants or niche process innovations can capture opportunities in smaller scale or specialized industrial applications. Overall, competitive advantage accrues to organizations that combine technical differentiation with flexible commercial models and an ability to partner across financing, construction, and long-term operations.
Practical strategic moves for senior executives to strengthen technology adoption, supply chain agility, contractual risk mitigation, and environmental performance across desalination portfolios
Industry leaders should pursue a strategy that balances technological investment, supply chain resilience, and contract design to secure favorable outcomes amid evolving policy and commercial realities. Prioritize investments in energy-efficient membranes and recovery technologies while accelerating pilots that integrate renewables and waste-heat sources to reduce operating exposure to grid volatility. Simultaneously, implement digital monitoring and performance analytics across portfolios to enable predictive maintenance and to support outcome-based contracting structures that align incentives between owners and providers.
From a procurement standpoint, diversify supplier bases and consider staged procurement to manage tariff and commodity risk, while negotiating contract clauses that permit equitable adjustments for material cost shocks. Pursue partnerships with local manufacturers and service providers to shorten lead times and reduce tariff vulnerability, particularly for projects in regions with complex trade dynamics. Finally, embed environmental performance metrics-such as brine management, energy intensity, and lifecycle emissions-into technical specifications and financing covenants to enhance regulatory acceptance and to unlock sustainability-focused capital sources. These measures collectively improve project resilience, reduce total lifecycle exposure, and position organizations to capitalize on near-term demand for reliable, lower-carbon water supply.
Comprehensive mixed-method research approach combining stakeholder interviews, on-site validation, secondary technical review, and scenario-based sensitivity analysis for robust insights
The research underpinning this analysis relied on a structured methodology that combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary research included in-depth interviews with developers, EPC contractors, technology providers, utilities, and project financiers to capture contemporary perspectives on deployment barriers, cost drivers, and preferred contractual structures. These conversations were supplemented by site visits and technology demonstrations where available to validate operational claims and to observe maintenance and pretreatment practices firsthand.
Secondary research drew on a broad spectrum of publicly available technical literature, regulatory filings, engineering standards, and patent disclosures to map technological trajectories and supply chain footprints. Data triangulation techniques were applied to reconcile differing inputs, and scenario analysis was used to examine the implications of policy changes such as tariff adjustments and carbon pricing on procurement and contractual models. The methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions, and sensitivity testing was conducted on key variables to highlight risk exposures and potential mitigation strategies for practitioners and investors.
Synthesis of technological progress, trade dynamics, and strategic imperatives that together determine which desalination projects will succeed under evolving economic and regulatory pressures
In conclusion, the desalination sector is at an inflection point where technological advances, regulatory pressures, and evolving commercial models converge to create new opportunities and operational imperatives. Improvements in membrane performance and energy recovery, combined with modular construction and digital operations, lower barriers to deployment and enable more projects to meet stringent environmental and cost objectives. At the same time, geopolitical and trade-related developments, including tariff adjustments, elevate the importance of supply chain strategy and contract design in preserving project viability and investor confidence.
Stakeholders who act decisively-investing in energy-efficient technologies, diversifying supply chains, and adopting outcome-focused commercial models-will capture disproportionate benefits as demand for resilient, lower-carbon water solutions grows. Moreover, region-specific approaches that account for regulatory regimes, resource endowments, and industrial demand profiles will be essential to achieving robust project outcomes. The cumulative evidence suggests that a pragmatic balance of technological rigor, commercial flexibility, and environmental stewardship will define success in the evolving desalination landscape.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Desalination Technologies Market, by Technology
- 8.1. Reverse Osmosis
- 8.2. Thermal
- 8.2.1. Mechanical Vapor Compression
- 8.2.2. Multi Effect Distillation
- 8.2.3. Multi Stage Flash
- 9. Desalination Technologies Market, by Source Water
- 9.1. Brackish Water
- 9.2. Seawater
- 9.3. Wastewater
- 10. Desalination Technologies Market, by Plant Capacity
- 10.1. 1000 To 5000 Cubic Meters Per Day
- 10.2. Greater Than 5000 Cubic Meters Per Day
- 10.3. Up To 1000 Cubic Meters Per Day
- 11. Desalination Technologies Market, by Configuration
- 11.1. Land Based
- 11.2. Offshore
- 11.2.1. Floating
- 11.2.2. Ship Based
- 12. Desalination Technologies Market, by Application
- 12.1. Agricultural
- 12.1.1. Irrigation
- 12.1.2. Livestock
- 12.2. Commercial
- 12.3. Industrial
- 12.3.1. Chemical Processing
- 12.3.2. Oil And Gas
- 12.3.3. Power Generation
- 12.4. Municipal
- 13. Desalination Technologies Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Desalination Technologies Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Desalination Technologies Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. United States Desalination Technologies Market
- 17. China Desalination Technologies Market
- 18. Competitive Landscape
- 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 18.5. Abengoa, S.A.
- 18.6. ACCIONA, S.A.
- 18.7. Alfa Laval AB
- 18.8. Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd.
- 18.9. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 18.10. General Electric Company
- 18.11. Genesis Water Technologies, Inc.
- 18.12. Hatenboer-Water B.V.
- 18.13. Hyundai ENP Co.
- 18.14. IDE Technologies Ltd.
- 18.15. SUEZ S.A.
- 18.16. Toray Industries, Inc.
- 18.17. Veolia Environnement S.A.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
