Dental Biomaterials Market by Product Type (Ceramics Biomaterials, Composites Biomaterials, Metallic Biomaterials), Application (Implantology, Orthodontics, Periodontics), End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Dental Biomaterials Market was valued at USD 9.76 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 10.43 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.22%, reaching USD 17.06 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction to the evolving dental biomaterials ecosystem integrating clinical demands, innovation pathways, and supply chain resilience
This executive summary introduces the contemporary dental biomaterials landscape, where advances in materials science intersect with digital dentistry and shifting clinical priorities. Over recent years clinicians, lab technicians, and manufacturers have navigated a more complex set of performance criteria: biocompatibility, esthetics, longevity, ease of processing, and compatibility with digital workflows. These drivers now coexist with heightened regulatory scrutiny and an intensified focus on supply chain robustness, prompting stakeholders to reassess sourcing, validation, and collaboration models.
Consequently, organizations must balance the need to innovate with the imperative to ensure consistent product availability and regulatory compliance. Today’s decisions around material selection and procurement increasingly reflect not only clinical performance but also manufacturability at scale, interoperability with CAD/CAM systems, and downstream costs of restorative care. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper analysis of transformative shifts, tariff-related trade impacts, segmentation-driven opportunities, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, and practical recommendations designed to help leadership teams align strategy to an environment defined by rapid technical progress and operational pressure.
As industries seek to embed resilient practices and accelerate clinical adoption, this summary highlights the foundational themes informing subsequent sections and frames the priorities that decision-makers should treat as immediate action items.
Examining shifts in dental biomaterials science, digital fabrication workflows, regulatory pressures, and clinical practice that are reshaping supply chains
The dental biomaterials sector is undergoing transformative shifts driven by material innovation, digitization of clinical and laboratory workflows, and a changing regulatory environment. New ceramic formulations and high-performance composites are pushing clinical expectations for longevity and esthetics, while additive manufacturing and CAD/CAM integration are altering how restorative work is designed, produced, and delivered. At the same time, suppliers face pressure to scale manufacturing without compromising material performance, which has accelerated investment in process optimization and quality control.
Moreover, regulatory frameworks are evolving to address novel materials and digital production methods, prompting manufacturers to adopt more proactive compliance strategies. In parallel, professional expectations are changing: clinicians demand materials that reduce chair time, simplify workflows, and deliver predictable outcomes. These converging trends are reshaping procurement criteria and prompting closer collaboration between clinicians, laboratories, and material suppliers.
Consequently, market participants must adapt by aligning R&D priorities with reproducible manufacturing practices, strengthening cross-functional collaboration, and investing in evidence generation to validate claims. In other words, innovation alone no longer guarantees adoption; successful products will combine demonstrable clinical performance, seamless integration into digital workflows, and robust supply continuity.
Assessing the impact of US tariffs enacted in 2025 on dental biomaterials supply chains, manufacturing costs, trade flows, and clinical product availability
United States tariff actions enacted in 2025 introduced a new layer of complexity for global suppliers, manufacturers, and buyers of dental biomaterials. Tariff measures that affect precursor materials, finished components, and equipment used in production changed cost structures and altered sourcing strategies overnight. As a result, manufacturers began reevaluating supplier relationships, nearshoring options, and inventory management practices to mitigate exposure to tariff volatility.
In practice, the tariff environment compelled greater emphasis on supplier diversification and dual-sourcing strategies. Companies that previously relied on concentrated supply pockets faced operational risks that necessitated contingency planning and more rigorous scenario analysis. Additionally, procurement teams responded by renegotiating contracts and intensifying collaboration with logistics partners to ensure predictable lead times.
At the clinical level, procurement committees and laboratory managers started prioritizing materials with stable supply profiles and validated equivalence to incumbent products. In turn, this dynamic accelerated demand for transparent supply chain mapping and traceability. Looking forward, the tariff-driven recalibration reinforced the need for flexible manufacturing footprints, stronger upstream relationships with raw material providers, and investment in regulatory and trade expertise to navigate continuing policy uncertainty.
Actionable segmentation intelligence across product types, clinical applications, end users, and channels to guide development and adoption strategies
Segmentation insight begins with product type, where categories such as ceramics, composites, glass ionomers, metals, and polymers define material selection and application. Ceramics further fragment into alumina, glass ceramics, lithium disilicate, and zirconia, each presenting distinct mechanical and esthetic trade-offs that influence clinical adoption. Composites range from bulk fill to hybrid, microfilled, and nanofilled chemistries, with formulation differences driving handling characteristics and long-term performance. Glass ionomers are studied across conventional and resin-modified variants, and metals are differentiated among cobalt chrome, gold alloys, stainless steel, and titanium, which in turn shape indications from removable prosthetics to implant fixtures. Polymers such as PEEK and PMMA offer alternative performance profiles for provisional and long-term applications.
When viewed through application lenses - endodontics, implantology, orthodontics, periodontics, prosthetics, and restorative - the mapping becomes clearer. Endodontics includes gutta percha points, irrigants, and sealants, while implantology divides into endosseous and subperiosteal implants. Orthodontics encompasses aligners, arch wires, and brackets; periodontics covers barrier membranes, bone grafts, and growth factors; prosthetics includes complete and partial dentures; and restorative work includes bridges, crowns, fillings, and inlays and onlays. Each application category drives unique material performance requirements, evidence needs, and supply considerations.
End users span dental clinics, dental laboratories, and hospitals, with laboratories further segmented into in-house and third-party labs. Distribution channels bifurcate into offline and online pathways, which influence buying behavior, service expectations, and the pace of new product adoption. Taken together, these segmentation dimensions provide a practical framework for prioritizing product development, commercialization strategies, and service models that align to clinical needs and procurement realities.
Regional comparison across Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific highlighting adoption drivers, regulatory nuance, and innovation clusters
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on adoption velocity, regulatory interpretation, and supply arrangements across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, established clinical networks, consolidated distribution channels, and a high prevalence of private dental practice shape demand toward materials that offer predictable clinical outcomes and compatibility with digital workflows. This environment rewards suppliers who provide robust clinical evidence and responsive logistics.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks and reimbursement pathways vary considerably, which places a premium on localized regulatory expertise and adaptive go-to-market strategies. Diverse clinical practices and differing laboratory capabilities across the region create pockets of rapid innovation alongside areas where traditional restorative approaches remain dominant. Consequently, firms that tailor product positioning and training programs regionally tend to achieve stronger penetration.
The Asia-Pacific region combines accelerating adoption in urban centers with cost sensitivities that shape procurement decisions in other markets. Rapid growth of digital dentistry in major markets, combined with local manufacturing capability, has created both competitive pressure and partnership opportunities for international and regional suppliers. Across all regions, these geographic distinctions underscore the need for nuanced market entry plans, differentiated commercial models, and supply strategies that reflect local regulatory, clinical, and logistical realities.
Competitive assessment of dental biomaterials companies focusing on innovation pipelines, strategic partnerships, manufacturing base, and commercial approaches
Company-level dynamics center on innovation pipelines, strategic alliances, manufacturing strategy, and commercial execution. Leading firms are investing in materials research to deliver demonstrable clinical advantages while simultaneously expanding capabilities that support digital integration and scalable manufacturing. Partnerships with dental schools, hospital systems, and laboratory networks are increasingly common as manufacturers seek independent clinical validation and broader practitioner buy-in.
Manufacturing decisions - including where to site production and how to structure supply networks - have emerged as differentiators. Organizations with flexible manufacturing bases and modular production approaches can respond more rapidly to demand shifts and policy changes. At the same time, companies pursuing vertical integration or strategic contract manufacturing arrangements are reducing lead-time risk and gaining cost visibility.
On the commercialization front, firms that combine clear value messaging with practical clinician education and laboratory support capture adoption momentum faster. Data-driven demonstrations of performance, hands-on training programs, and streamlined distribution agreements strengthen market positioning. In short, competitive advantage arises from the confluence of credible clinical evidence, resilient operations, and focused commercial execution rather than from a single differentiator alone.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to prioritize R&D, fortify supply resilience, engage regulators, and refine commercial models
Industry leaders should prioritize four interrelated actions: invest selectively in R&D that targets clinically meaningful performance gains, strengthen supply resilience through diversified sourcing and scalable production, maintain active regulatory engagement to anticipate compliance shifts, and refine commercial models to accelerate clinician and laboratory adoption.
First, R&D investments should align to clinical pain points where material science can materially change outcomes, such as improving fracture resistance, simplifying chairside workflows, or enhancing compatibility with digital fabrication. Second, supply resilience requires a blend of dual sourcing, strategic buffer inventories, and flexibility in manufacturing locations to mitigate trade and tariff disruptions. Third, proactive regulatory engagement reduces the risk of delayed market access by aligning evidence generation to both current standards and foreseeable changes. Finally, commercial refinement should focus on integrated support for clinicians and labs, clear value propositions that translate into time or cost savings, and training that reduces perceived adoption friction.
Taken together, these steps will enable organizations to convert technical innovation into durable market advantage while minimizing exposure to operational and policy risks. Executing these priorities will demand cross-functional coordination, targeted investment, and disciplined project management.
Research methodology describing primary and secondary sources, expert consultations, synthesis process, validation checkpoints, and analytical frameworks
This research relies on a mixed-methods approach integrating primary and secondary evidence to ensure balanced, verifiable findings. Primary inputs included structured consultations with technical experts, laboratory managers, clinicians, and procurement professionals, which were synthesized against secondary sources such as peer-reviewed literature, regulatory documentation, and publicly disclosed company information. The analytical process combined qualitative thematic synthesis with structured validation checkpoints to triangulate conclusions and reduce bias.
Throughout the study, evidence was cross-checked via expert consultations and documented use-case reviews to ensure practical relevance. Synthesis steps emphasized causal explanation and scenario analysis rather than simple correlation, which provided deeper insight into drivers of adoption, manufacturing imperatives, and regulatory risk. Validation checkpoints included iterative reviews with independent subject matter specialists to confirm that interpretations aligned with operational realities.
Finally, the analytical frameworks employed prioritize translational value for decision-makers: segmentation-based prioritization, risk mitigation planning, and commercial model assessment. These methods produce findings meant to be actionable for leaders seeking to align investment, operations, and market engagement to an evolving dental biomaterials landscape.
Concluding synthesis outlining strategic implications, risk considerations, and pragmatic pathways for stakeholders to translate material innovations into clinical and commercial value
In conclusion, the dental biomaterials landscape presents a clear intersection of opportunity and complexity. Material innovations, digital workflows, and changing regulatory expectations create pathways for improved clinical outcomes and new commercial models. At the same time, policy shifts and trade measures have increased the premium on supply chain transparency and operational flexibility. Stakeholders that integrate rigorous evidence generation with resilient sourcing and targeted commercialization will be best positioned to capture long-term value.
Risk management and strategic alignment are central themes: firms must prioritize investments that address demonstrable clinical needs while building operational models that absorb regulatory and trade volatility. In parallel, regional nuance demands tailored approaches to market entry and distribution, whereas competitive differentiation increasingly depends on the ability to combine product performance with integrated services and training.
Moving from insight to implementation requires disciplined project management, cross-functional collaboration, and an unwavering focus on clinical relevance. Organizations that heed these conclusions can convert technical advances into sustainable commercial outcomes and stronger patient care pathways.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction to the evolving dental biomaterials ecosystem integrating clinical demands, innovation pathways, and supply chain resilience
This executive summary introduces the contemporary dental biomaterials landscape, where advances in materials science intersect with digital dentistry and shifting clinical priorities. Over recent years clinicians, lab technicians, and manufacturers have navigated a more complex set of performance criteria: biocompatibility, esthetics, longevity, ease of processing, and compatibility with digital workflows. These drivers now coexist with heightened regulatory scrutiny and an intensified focus on supply chain robustness, prompting stakeholders to reassess sourcing, validation, and collaboration models.
Consequently, organizations must balance the need to innovate with the imperative to ensure consistent product availability and regulatory compliance. Today’s decisions around material selection and procurement increasingly reflect not only clinical performance but also manufacturability at scale, interoperability with CAD/CAM systems, and downstream costs of restorative care. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper analysis of transformative shifts, tariff-related trade impacts, segmentation-driven opportunities, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, and practical recommendations designed to help leadership teams align strategy to an environment defined by rapid technical progress and operational pressure.
As industries seek to embed resilient practices and accelerate clinical adoption, this summary highlights the foundational themes informing subsequent sections and frames the priorities that decision-makers should treat as immediate action items.
Examining shifts in dental biomaterials science, digital fabrication workflows, regulatory pressures, and clinical practice that are reshaping supply chains
The dental biomaterials sector is undergoing transformative shifts driven by material innovation, digitization of clinical and laboratory workflows, and a changing regulatory environment. New ceramic formulations and high-performance composites are pushing clinical expectations for longevity and esthetics, while additive manufacturing and CAD/CAM integration are altering how restorative work is designed, produced, and delivered. At the same time, suppliers face pressure to scale manufacturing without compromising material performance, which has accelerated investment in process optimization and quality control.
Moreover, regulatory frameworks are evolving to address novel materials and digital production methods, prompting manufacturers to adopt more proactive compliance strategies. In parallel, professional expectations are changing: clinicians demand materials that reduce chair time, simplify workflows, and deliver predictable outcomes. These converging trends are reshaping procurement criteria and prompting closer collaboration between clinicians, laboratories, and material suppliers.
Consequently, market participants must adapt by aligning R&D priorities with reproducible manufacturing practices, strengthening cross-functional collaboration, and investing in evidence generation to validate claims. In other words, innovation alone no longer guarantees adoption; successful products will combine demonstrable clinical performance, seamless integration into digital workflows, and robust supply continuity.
Assessing the impact of US tariffs enacted in 2025 on dental biomaterials supply chains, manufacturing costs, trade flows, and clinical product availability
United States tariff actions enacted in 2025 introduced a new layer of complexity for global suppliers, manufacturers, and buyers of dental biomaterials. Tariff measures that affect precursor materials, finished components, and equipment used in production changed cost structures and altered sourcing strategies overnight. As a result, manufacturers began reevaluating supplier relationships, nearshoring options, and inventory management practices to mitigate exposure to tariff volatility.
In practice, the tariff environment compelled greater emphasis on supplier diversification and dual-sourcing strategies. Companies that previously relied on concentrated supply pockets faced operational risks that necessitated contingency planning and more rigorous scenario analysis. Additionally, procurement teams responded by renegotiating contracts and intensifying collaboration with logistics partners to ensure predictable lead times.
At the clinical level, procurement committees and laboratory managers started prioritizing materials with stable supply profiles and validated equivalence to incumbent products. In turn, this dynamic accelerated demand for transparent supply chain mapping and traceability. Looking forward, the tariff-driven recalibration reinforced the need for flexible manufacturing footprints, stronger upstream relationships with raw material providers, and investment in regulatory and trade expertise to navigate continuing policy uncertainty.
Actionable segmentation intelligence across product types, clinical applications, end users, and channels to guide development and adoption strategies
Segmentation insight begins with product type, where categories such as ceramics, composites, glass ionomers, metals, and polymers define material selection and application. Ceramics further fragment into alumina, glass ceramics, lithium disilicate, and zirconia, each presenting distinct mechanical and esthetic trade-offs that influence clinical adoption. Composites range from bulk fill to hybrid, microfilled, and nanofilled chemistries, with formulation differences driving handling characteristics and long-term performance. Glass ionomers are studied across conventional and resin-modified variants, and metals are differentiated among cobalt chrome, gold alloys, stainless steel, and titanium, which in turn shape indications from removable prosthetics to implant fixtures. Polymers such as PEEK and PMMA offer alternative performance profiles for provisional and long-term applications.
When viewed through application lenses - endodontics, implantology, orthodontics, periodontics, prosthetics, and restorative - the mapping becomes clearer. Endodontics includes gutta percha points, irrigants, and sealants, while implantology divides into endosseous and subperiosteal implants. Orthodontics encompasses aligners, arch wires, and brackets; periodontics covers barrier membranes, bone grafts, and growth factors; prosthetics includes complete and partial dentures; and restorative work includes bridges, crowns, fillings, and inlays and onlays. Each application category drives unique material performance requirements, evidence needs, and supply considerations.
End users span dental clinics, dental laboratories, and hospitals, with laboratories further segmented into in-house and third-party labs. Distribution channels bifurcate into offline and online pathways, which influence buying behavior, service expectations, and the pace of new product adoption. Taken together, these segmentation dimensions provide a practical framework for prioritizing product development, commercialization strategies, and service models that align to clinical needs and procurement realities.
Regional comparison across Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific highlighting adoption drivers, regulatory nuance, and innovation clusters
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on adoption velocity, regulatory interpretation, and supply arrangements across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, established clinical networks, consolidated distribution channels, and a high prevalence of private dental practice shape demand toward materials that offer predictable clinical outcomes and compatibility with digital workflows. This environment rewards suppliers who provide robust clinical evidence and responsive logistics.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks and reimbursement pathways vary considerably, which places a premium on localized regulatory expertise and adaptive go-to-market strategies. Diverse clinical practices and differing laboratory capabilities across the region create pockets of rapid innovation alongside areas where traditional restorative approaches remain dominant. Consequently, firms that tailor product positioning and training programs regionally tend to achieve stronger penetration.
The Asia-Pacific region combines accelerating adoption in urban centers with cost sensitivities that shape procurement decisions in other markets. Rapid growth of digital dentistry in major markets, combined with local manufacturing capability, has created both competitive pressure and partnership opportunities for international and regional suppliers. Across all regions, these geographic distinctions underscore the need for nuanced market entry plans, differentiated commercial models, and supply strategies that reflect local regulatory, clinical, and logistical realities.
Competitive assessment of dental biomaterials companies focusing on innovation pipelines, strategic partnerships, manufacturing base, and commercial approaches
Company-level dynamics center on innovation pipelines, strategic alliances, manufacturing strategy, and commercial execution. Leading firms are investing in materials research to deliver demonstrable clinical advantages while simultaneously expanding capabilities that support digital integration and scalable manufacturing. Partnerships with dental schools, hospital systems, and laboratory networks are increasingly common as manufacturers seek independent clinical validation and broader practitioner buy-in.
Manufacturing decisions - including where to site production and how to structure supply networks - have emerged as differentiators. Organizations with flexible manufacturing bases and modular production approaches can respond more rapidly to demand shifts and policy changes. At the same time, companies pursuing vertical integration or strategic contract manufacturing arrangements are reducing lead-time risk and gaining cost visibility.
On the commercialization front, firms that combine clear value messaging with practical clinician education and laboratory support capture adoption momentum faster. Data-driven demonstrations of performance, hands-on training programs, and streamlined distribution agreements strengthen market positioning. In short, competitive advantage arises from the confluence of credible clinical evidence, resilient operations, and focused commercial execution rather than from a single differentiator alone.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to prioritize R&D, fortify supply resilience, engage regulators, and refine commercial models
Industry leaders should prioritize four interrelated actions: invest selectively in R&D that targets clinically meaningful performance gains, strengthen supply resilience through diversified sourcing and scalable production, maintain active regulatory engagement to anticipate compliance shifts, and refine commercial models to accelerate clinician and laboratory adoption.
First, R&D investments should align to clinical pain points where material science can materially change outcomes, such as improving fracture resistance, simplifying chairside workflows, or enhancing compatibility with digital fabrication. Second, supply resilience requires a blend of dual sourcing, strategic buffer inventories, and flexibility in manufacturing locations to mitigate trade and tariff disruptions. Third, proactive regulatory engagement reduces the risk of delayed market access by aligning evidence generation to both current standards and foreseeable changes. Finally, commercial refinement should focus on integrated support for clinicians and labs, clear value propositions that translate into time or cost savings, and training that reduces perceived adoption friction.
Taken together, these steps will enable organizations to convert technical innovation into durable market advantage while minimizing exposure to operational and policy risks. Executing these priorities will demand cross-functional coordination, targeted investment, and disciplined project management.
Research methodology describing primary and secondary sources, expert consultations, synthesis process, validation checkpoints, and analytical frameworks
This research relies on a mixed-methods approach integrating primary and secondary evidence to ensure balanced, verifiable findings. Primary inputs included structured consultations with technical experts, laboratory managers, clinicians, and procurement professionals, which were synthesized against secondary sources such as peer-reviewed literature, regulatory documentation, and publicly disclosed company information. The analytical process combined qualitative thematic synthesis with structured validation checkpoints to triangulate conclusions and reduce bias.
Throughout the study, evidence was cross-checked via expert consultations and documented use-case reviews to ensure practical relevance. Synthesis steps emphasized causal explanation and scenario analysis rather than simple correlation, which provided deeper insight into drivers of adoption, manufacturing imperatives, and regulatory risk. Validation checkpoints included iterative reviews with independent subject matter specialists to confirm that interpretations aligned with operational realities.
Finally, the analytical frameworks employed prioritize translational value for decision-makers: segmentation-based prioritization, risk mitigation planning, and commercial model assessment. These methods produce findings meant to be actionable for leaders seeking to align investment, operations, and market engagement to an evolving dental biomaterials landscape.
Concluding synthesis outlining strategic implications, risk considerations, and pragmatic pathways for stakeholders to translate material innovations into clinical and commercial value
In conclusion, the dental biomaterials landscape presents a clear intersection of opportunity and complexity. Material innovations, digital workflows, and changing regulatory expectations create pathways for improved clinical outcomes and new commercial models. At the same time, policy shifts and trade measures have increased the premium on supply chain transparency and operational flexibility. Stakeholders that integrate rigorous evidence generation with resilient sourcing and targeted commercialization will be best positioned to capture long-term value.
Risk management and strategic alignment are central themes: firms must prioritize investments that address demonstrable clinical needs while building operational models that absorb regulatory and trade volatility. In parallel, regional nuance demands tailored approaches to market entry and distribution, whereas competitive differentiation increasingly depends on the ability to combine product performance with integrated services and training.
Moving from insight to implementation requires disciplined project management, cross-functional collaboration, and an unwavering focus on clinical relevance. Organizations that heed these conclusions can convert technical advances into sustainable commercial outcomes and stronger patient care pathways.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of bioactive ceramics with antibacterial and remineralizing properties for restorative applications
- 5.2. Integration of 3D printing technologies with novel polymer composites for custom dental prostheses
- 5.3. Development of nanohydroxyapatite-infused adhesives for enhanced enamel bonding and remineralization
- 5.4. Rising demand for zirconia-based implant abutments offering superior aesthetics and fracture resistance
- 5.5. Advancements in antimicrobial peptide coatings for dental implants to reduce peri-implantitis risk
- 5.6. Use of graphene oxide-reinforced resin composites to improve mechanical strength and durability
- 5.7. Surge in adoption of bioresorbable collagen scaffolds for alveolar bone regeneration and defect repair
- 5.8. Innovations in photopolymerizable glass ionomer cements with rapid curing and high fluoride release
- 5.9. Implementation of AI-driven material design for predictive performance of dental restorative formulations
- 5.10. Growing interest in plant-derived biopolymers as sustainable alternatives in dental barrier membranes
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Dental Biomaterials Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Ceramics Biomaterials
- 8.1.1. Alumina
- 8.1.2. Glass Ceramics
- 8.1.3. Zirconia
- 8.2. Composites Biomaterials
- 8.2.1. Bulk Fill
- 8.2.2. Hybrid
- 8.2.3. Microfilled
- 8.2.4. Nanofilled
- 8.3. Metallic Biomaterials
- 8.3.1. Cobalt-Chromium Alloys
- 8.3.2. Gold Alloys
- 8.3.3. Stainless Steel
- 8.3.4. Titanium & Alloys
- 8.4. Polymeric Biomaterials
- 8.4.1. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)
- 8.4.2. Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA)
- 8.4.3. Polyvinyl Siloxane (PVS)
- 8.4.4. Polyether (PE)
- 8.5. Natural Biomaterials
- 8.5.1. Protein-Based
- 8.5.2. Polysaccharide-Based
- 9. Dental Biomaterials Market, by Application
- 9.1. Implantology
- 9.1.1. Dental Implants
- 9.1.2. Abutments
- 9.2. Orthodontics
- 9.2.1. Aligners
- 9.2.2. Arch Wires
- 9.2.3. Brackets
- 9.3. Periodontics
- 9.3.1. Barrier Membranes
- 9.3.2. Bone Grafts
- 9.3.3. Growth Factors
- 9.4. Prosthetics
- 9.4.1. Complete Dentures
- 9.4.2. Partial Dentures
- 9.5. Restorative
- 9.5.1. Bridges
- 9.5.2. Crowns
- 9.5.3. Fillings
- 9.5.4. Inlays & Onlays
- 9.6. Endodontics
- 9.6.1. Gutta Percha Points
- 9.6.2. Irrigants & Disinfectants
- 9.6.3. Sealants
- 10. Dental Biomaterials Market, by End User
- 10.1. Hospitals & Dental Clinics
- 10.2. Dental Laboratories & Research Institutes
- 10.3. Dental Product Manufacturers
- 11. Dental Biomaterials Market, by Distribution Channel
- 11.1. Offline
- 11.2. Online
- 12. Dental Biomaterials Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Dental Biomaterials Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Dental Biomaterials Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Straumann Group
- 15.3.2. Dentsply Sirona Inc.
- 15.3.3. 3M Company
- 15.3.4. BEGO GmbH & Co. KG
- 15.3.5. Bioloren S.r.l.
- 15.3.6. Bisco, Inc.
- 15.3.7. Brasseler USA
- 15.3.8. CAM Bioceramics
- 15.3.9. Carpenter Technology Corporation
- 15.3.10. COLTENE Holding AG
- 15.3.11. Den-Mat Holdings, LLC
- 15.3.12. DSM-Firmenich AG
- 15.3.13. Envista Holdings Corporation
- 15.3.14. GC CORPORATION
- 15.3.15. Geistlich Pharma AG
- 15.3.16. Henry Schein, Inc.
- 15.3.17. Ivoclar Vivadent AG
- 15.3.18. Keystone Dental Group
- 15.3.19. KURARAY CO., LTD.
- 15.3.20. Medtronic plc
- 15.3.21. Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
- 15.3.22. Septodont Holding
- 15.3.23. SHOFU INC.
- 15.3.24. Victrex Manufacturing Limited
- 15.3.25. VITA Zahnfabrik
- 15.3.26. VOCO GmbH
- 15.3.27. Young Innovations, Inc.
- 15.3.28. ZimVie Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
