Defense Logistics Market by Service Type (Inventory Management, Maintenance Repair And Overhaul, Packaging And Handling), Platform (Air, Land, Sea), Contract Type, Ownership Model, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Defense Logistics Market was valued at USD 145.79 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 155.78 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.76%, reaching USD 246.20 billion by 2032.
Concise strategic framing of defense logistics priorities and tradeoffs emphasizing readiness, resilience, digital integration, and procurement alignment for decision makers
This introduction frames the contemporary defense logistics environment, emphasizing the persistent interplay between operational readiness, supply chain adaptability, and fiscal discipline. Over recent years, defense logistics has moved from a largely transactional support function toward a strategic capability that directly influences force projection, sustainment tempo, and mission assurance. As a result, logistics leaders now face simultaneous pressures to enhance resilience against disruption, accelerate technology adoption, and optimize lifecycle support within stringent contracting and compliance regimes.
Consequently, stakeholders across services and agencies are re-evaluating legacy processes and supplier relationships to better align with distributed operations and high-tempo sustainment demands. Emerging expectations include tighter integration of maintenance and inventory management with predictive analytics, greater modularity in transportation and warehousing, and closer alignment of procurement mechanisms with operational risk management. In this context, decision-makers must balance near-term readiness imperatives with longer-term investments in automation, digital twins, and interoperable logistics architectures. The subsequent sections build on this framing to examine transformational shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation nuances, regional dynamics, corporate behaviors, practical recommendations, and the research approach that informs these conclusions.
High-impact transformative shifts reshaping defense logistics through automation, distributed operations, outcome-based contracting, and integrated sustainment ecosystems for modern forces
The defense logistics landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological maturation, operational dispersion, and evolving geopolitical pressures. Advances in automation and predictive maintenance are reducing unscheduled downtime and changing inventory dynamics, while digital supply chain fabrics extend visibility across previously siloed nodes. Concurrently, the proliferation of distributed operations and expeditionary postures compels new transportation and warehousing concepts that prioritize agility and rapid throughput over traditional centralized stockpiles.
Furthermore, contract models and ownership structures are shifting as services seek greater performance accountability and lifecycle cost clarity. Outsourcing arrangements are becoming more outcome-oriented, with prime contractors and third-party logistics providers assuming expanded roles in integrated sustainment. At the same time, interoperability requirements and platform modernization introduce complexity into procurement and sustainment planning, necessitating closer collaboration between program offices, logistics commands, and suppliers. As a result, logistics ecosystems are moving toward modular, data-driven solutions that balance sovereign control with efficient commercial engagement, creating both strategic opportunity and implementation risk for program leaders.
Comprehensive analysis of how United States tariff measures through 2025 have reshaped sourcing resilience, supplier consolidation, compliance burden, and inventory policy across defense supply chains
The cumulative impact of United States tariff actions through 2025 has created a complex set of ripple effects across defense logistics supply chains, procurement strategies, and supplier risk profiles. Tariff-driven cost pressure has prompted procurement teams to reassess sourcing patterns, favoring suppliers with resilient multi-region footprints or localized manufacturing capabilities to mitigate border-related pricing volatility. In turn, logistics planners have adapted their inventory policies to incorporate greater buffer considerations for critical components while simultaneously exploring inventory pooling, alternate routing, and contractual hedges to preserve mission assurance without compromising compliance.
Moreover, tariffs have accelerated supplier consolidation in specific commodity classes where duty exposure materially affected small and midsize vendors, thereby influencing subcontractor ecosystems and the distribution of specialized maintenance capabilities. This consolidation has reinforced the importance of supplier diversification and qualification pathways for primes seeking to maintain competitive procurement cycles. Regulatory and customs compliance burdens have also increased administrative overhead, shifting some workload from program managers to supply chain compliance teams. Taken together, these dynamics have elevated the strategic role of sourcing decisions, making tariff-aware contracting and integrated logistics planning essential components of risk management for sustainment programs.
In-depth segmentation analysis connecting service type, platform, end user, contract type, and ownership model to operational requirements, risk allocation, and capability investment priorities
Key segmentation insights reveal differentiated demand profiles and capability requirements across service type, platform, end user, contract type, and ownership model, each of which carries specific implications for procurement and sustainment strategies. Based on Service Type, the market is studied across Inventory Management, Maintenance Repair And Overhaul, Packaging And Handling, Procurement And Sourcing, Transportation, and Warehousing And Distribution, and within inventory management there is a clear divergence between Automated Inventory Management solutions and Manual Inventory Management practices. The Maintenance Repair And Overhaul domain subdivides into Corrective Maintenance, Predictive Maintenance, and Preventive Maintenance, each driving distinct tooling, data, and contractual expectations. Transportation modalities are differentiated by Air Transportation, Land Transportation, and Sea Transportation, which in turn influence lead-time planning, risk tolerance, and forward-basing concepts. Warehousing And Distribution strategies vary across Bonded Warehousing, Cross Docking, and Non Bonded Warehousing, affecting how stocks are staged for rapid deployment.
Based on Platform, supply chain requirements differ markedly across Air, Land, Sea, and Space, with each platform introducing unique obsolescence cycles, spares footprint, and transport constraints. Based on End User, actors such as Air Force, Army, Defense Agencies, Marine Corps, and Navy have distinct doctrine, operational tempos, and contracting authorities; within Defense Agencies, the Defense Logistics Agency exemplifies centralized procurement and distribution models that interface with service-specific sustainment constructs. Based on Contract Type, cost reimbursable, fixed price, and time and material arrangements allocate risk and incentivize performance differently, influencing supplier selection and program governance. Finally, based on Ownership Model, distinctions between In House and Outsourced approaches matter for capability retention, while outsourced pathways segment into Prime Contractor, Subcontractor, and Third Party Logistics Provider roles, and prime contractor categories further divide into Large Prime Contractor and Small And Midsize Prime Contractor profiles, shaping bargaining power, innovation adoption, and supply chain architecture choices. Together, these segmentation lenses support a nuanced view of where investment, standards harmonization, and policy attention will most effectively enhance logistics outcomes.
Strategic regional breakdown of logistics priorities and infrastructure implications across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific theaters for sustainment planners
Regional insights underscore how geopolitical context, industrial base maturity, and infrastructure topology influence logistics approaches and partnership strategies across global theaters. In the Americas, logistics emphasis tends to center on interoperability within continental supply corridors, rapid mobilization capacity, and robust defense industrial collaboration between government and private sector partners to support both strategic lift and sustainment pipelines. Transitional infrastructure upgrades and regional procurement harmonization efforts are shaping how inventories are staged for hemispheric contingencies.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the operating environment requires adaptive logistics basing, resilient prepositioning, and complex multinational coordination to address dispersed mission sets and alliance frameworks. Here, logistics planners prioritize flexible warehousing solutions and cross-border customs facilitation to maintain readiness in dynamic political contexts. In the Asia-Pacific region, vast distances, diverse port and airlift capacities, and increasing emphasis on distributed maritime and joint operations drive investments in forward logistics nodes, expeditionary warehousing concepts, and more frequent rotational sustainment flows. Across regions, infrastructure constraints, supplier ecosystems, and regulatory regimes collectively determine feasible sourcing strategies and the degree to which automation and digital visibility can be scaled into operational practice.
Actionable commercial intelligence on supplier capabilities, collaboration patterns, technology adoption, and compliance strengths shaping competitive positioning in defense logistics
Key companies insights reveal common patterns in capability development, partnership structures, and technology adoption. Leading contractors and logistics providers are increasingly packaging integrated offerings that combine end-to-end inventory visibility, predictive maintenance analytics, and turnkey distribution services. These firms are competing on latency reduction, digital interoperability, and contract vehicles that align incentives toward measurable readiness outcomes. At the same time, smaller and midsize providers are carving niche positions by specializing in rapid deployment logistics, component-level overhaul, or regional warehousing networks that support agile force posture.
Strategic collaborations are becoming more prevalent, with prime contractors partnering with technology firms, specialized MRO providers, and regional logistics operators to assemble capability stacks that address complex sustainment requirements. Investment in secure data exchange, common standards for parts traceability, and certified repair workflows is accelerating as organizations seek to reduce lifecycle risk. Additionally, companies that demonstrate strong compliance management and tariff-aware sourcing are winning preference in procurement processes that weigh supply chain resilience alongside price. For defense buyers, the evolving vendor landscape requires rigorous due diligence on service level commitments, talent pipelines, and the ability to scale demonstrable outcomes across joint and coalition environments.
Practical, high-impact recommendations for defense logistics leaders to enhance resilience, integrate digital maintenance solutions, diversify suppliers, and reform contracting for measurable outcomes
Industry leaders should prioritize a series of pragmatic actions to align logistics capability with operational risk and fiscal constraints. First, embed tariff and trade-risk considerations into strategic sourcing decisions and contract language so that supplier selection and inventory policies proactively mitigate exposure. Second, accelerate adoption of predictive maintenance and inventory automation where the productivity gains can be directly mapped to readiness improvements, while ensuring that digital solutions are implemented with appropriate cybersecurity and interoperability controls.
Third, restructure contracting approaches to incentivize performance outcomes, including outcome-based milestones that tie payments to readiness metrics, but couple those approaches with robust governance and clear data-sharing protocols. Fourth, diversify supplier ecosystems by qualifying regional vendors and establishing certified subcontractor pools to reduce single-source dependencies and accelerate surge capacity. Fifth, invest in cross-functional training and center-of-excellence constructs that integrate program offices, logistics commands, and procurement teams to improve decision cadence and consistency. Finally, pilot modular warehousing and multimodal transportation concepts in selected theaters to validate concepts of operation before broader rollout. Collectively, these actions improve resilience and maintainability while positioning organizations to respond more nimbly to operational and fiscal shocks.
Transparent and reproducible research methodology combining senior stakeholder interviews, documentary analysis, and comparative case synthesis to underpin defensible logistics conclusions
The research methodology underpinning this analysis blends primary engagement, documentary review, and structured synthesis to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary inputs included interviews with senior logistics and procurement officials, program managers, and supply chain leaders across services and defense agencies, providing direct insight into doctrine, sustainment pain points, and procurement preferences. Secondary sources encompassed publicly available policy documents, procurement regulations, customs and tariff notices, technical standards, and supplier capability statements that inform the operational and regulatory context for logistics decision-making.
Analytical methods combined qualitative thematic analysis with comparative case review to identify recurring patterns in supplier behavior, contractual innovation, and logistics design. Cross-validation occurred by triangulating interview findings with documented procurement outcomes and observed supplier investments in automation and maintenance technologies. Ethical considerations and source attribution guided the synthesis, and care was taken to avoid proprietary disclosures. The methodology emphasizes transparency of assumptions, reproducibility of thematic coding, and clear linkage between evidence and conclusion to support defensible recommendations for programmatic action.
Concise concluding synthesis highlighting the imperative to integrate contracting, digital maintenance, and regional logistics posture to secure operational sustainment outcomes
In conclusion, defense logistics is at an inflection point where operational demands, commercial practices, and regulatory pressures converge to shape sustainment outcomes. The interplay of automation, contract innovation, regional infrastructure, and trade policy necessitates holistic approaches that integrate procurement, maintenance, transportation, and warehousing decisions. Leaders who align sourcing strategy with platform and theater-specific requirements, while embedding resilience into contracts and supplier ecosystems, will be better positioned to sustain high-tempo operations and manage lifecycle risk.
Moving forward, incremental pilots that demonstrate measurable readiness improvements, coupled with disciplined supplier qualification and tariff-aware sourcing, provide a pragmatic path to broader transformation. Continued emphasis on standards for data interoperability, secure information exchange, and maintenance certification will further enable scalable logistics modernization. Ultimately, the combination of adaptive contracting, targeted technology investment, and regionalized logistics posturing will determine how effectively organizations translate strategic intent into dependable operational sustainment.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Concise strategic framing of defense logistics priorities and tradeoffs emphasizing readiness, resilience, digital integration, and procurement alignment for decision makers
This introduction frames the contemporary defense logistics environment, emphasizing the persistent interplay between operational readiness, supply chain adaptability, and fiscal discipline. Over recent years, defense logistics has moved from a largely transactional support function toward a strategic capability that directly influences force projection, sustainment tempo, and mission assurance. As a result, logistics leaders now face simultaneous pressures to enhance resilience against disruption, accelerate technology adoption, and optimize lifecycle support within stringent contracting and compliance regimes.
Consequently, stakeholders across services and agencies are re-evaluating legacy processes and supplier relationships to better align with distributed operations and high-tempo sustainment demands. Emerging expectations include tighter integration of maintenance and inventory management with predictive analytics, greater modularity in transportation and warehousing, and closer alignment of procurement mechanisms with operational risk management. In this context, decision-makers must balance near-term readiness imperatives with longer-term investments in automation, digital twins, and interoperable logistics architectures. The subsequent sections build on this framing to examine transformational shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation nuances, regional dynamics, corporate behaviors, practical recommendations, and the research approach that informs these conclusions.
High-impact transformative shifts reshaping defense logistics through automation, distributed operations, outcome-based contracting, and integrated sustainment ecosystems for modern forces
The defense logistics landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological maturation, operational dispersion, and evolving geopolitical pressures. Advances in automation and predictive maintenance are reducing unscheduled downtime and changing inventory dynamics, while digital supply chain fabrics extend visibility across previously siloed nodes. Concurrently, the proliferation of distributed operations and expeditionary postures compels new transportation and warehousing concepts that prioritize agility and rapid throughput over traditional centralized stockpiles.
Furthermore, contract models and ownership structures are shifting as services seek greater performance accountability and lifecycle cost clarity. Outsourcing arrangements are becoming more outcome-oriented, with prime contractors and third-party logistics providers assuming expanded roles in integrated sustainment. At the same time, interoperability requirements and platform modernization introduce complexity into procurement and sustainment planning, necessitating closer collaboration between program offices, logistics commands, and suppliers. As a result, logistics ecosystems are moving toward modular, data-driven solutions that balance sovereign control with efficient commercial engagement, creating both strategic opportunity and implementation risk for program leaders.
Comprehensive analysis of how United States tariff measures through 2025 have reshaped sourcing resilience, supplier consolidation, compliance burden, and inventory policy across defense supply chains
The cumulative impact of United States tariff actions through 2025 has created a complex set of ripple effects across defense logistics supply chains, procurement strategies, and supplier risk profiles. Tariff-driven cost pressure has prompted procurement teams to reassess sourcing patterns, favoring suppliers with resilient multi-region footprints or localized manufacturing capabilities to mitigate border-related pricing volatility. In turn, logistics planners have adapted their inventory policies to incorporate greater buffer considerations for critical components while simultaneously exploring inventory pooling, alternate routing, and contractual hedges to preserve mission assurance without compromising compliance.
Moreover, tariffs have accelerated supplier consolidation in specific commodity classes where duty exposure materially affected small and midsize vendors, thereby influencing subcontractor ecosystems and the distribution of specialized maintenance capabilities. This consolidation has reinforced the importance of supplier diversification and qualification pathways for primes seeking to maintain competitive procurement cycles. Regulatory and customs compliance burdens have also increased administrative overhead, shifting some workload from program managers to supply chain compliance teams. Taken together, these dynamics have elevated the strategic role of sourcing decisions, making tariff-aware contracting and integrated logistics planning essential components of risk management for sustainment programs.
In-depth segmentation analysis connecting service type, platform, end user, contract type, and ownership model to operational requirements, risk allocation, and capability investment priorities
Key segmentation insights reveal differentiated demand profiles and capability requirements across service type, platform, end user, contract type, and ownership model, each of which carries specific implications for procurement and sustainment strategies. Based on Service Type, the market is studied across Inventory Management, Maintenance Repair And Overhaul, Packaging And Handling, Procurement And Sourcing, Transportation, and Warehousing And Distribution, and within inventory management there is a clear divergence between Automated Inventory Management solutions and Manual Inventory Management practices. The Maintenance Repair And Overhaul domain subdivides into Corrective Maintenance, Predictive Maintenance, and Preventive Maintenance, each driving distinct tooling, data, and contractual expectations. Transportation modalities are differentiated by Air Transportation, Land Transportation, and Sea Transportation, which in turn influence lead-time planning, risk tolerance, and forward-basing concepts. Warehousing And Distribution strategies vary across Bonded Warehousing, Cross Docking, and Non Bonded Warehousing, affecting how stocks are staged for rapid deployment.
Based on Platform, supply chain requirements differ markedly across Air, Land, Sea, and Space, with each platform introducing unique obsolescence cycles, spares footprint, and transport constraints. Based on End User, actors such as Air Force, Army, Defense Agencies, Marine Corps, and Navy have distinct doctrine, operational tempos, and contracting authorities; within Defense Agencies, the Defense Logistics Agency exemplifies centralized procurement and distribution models that interface with service-specific sustainment constructs. Based on Contract Type, cost reimbursable, fixed price, and time and material arrangements allocate risk and incentivize performance differently, influencing supplier selection and program governance. Finally, based on Ownership Model, distinctions between In House and Outsourced approaches matter for capability retention, while outsourced pathways segment into Prime Contractor, Subcontractor, and Third Party Logistics Provider roles, and prime contractor categories further divide into Large Prime Contractor and Small And Midsize Prime Contractor profiles, shaping bargaining power, innovation adoption, and supply chain architecture choices. Together, these segmentation lenses support a nuanced view of where investment, standards harmonization, and policy attention will most effectively enhance logistics outcomes.
Strategic regional breakdown of logistics priorities and infrastructure implications across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific theaters for sustainment planners
Regional insights underscore how geopolitical context, industrial base maturity, and infrastructure topology influence logistics approaches and partnership strategies across global theaters. In the Americas, logistics emphasis tends to center on interoperability within continental supply corridors, rapid mobilization capacity, and robust defense industrial collaboration between government and private sector partners to support both strategic lift and sustainment pipelines. Transitional infrastructure upgrades and regional procurement harmonization efforts are shaping how inventories are staged for hemispheric contingencies.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the operating environment requires adaptive logistics basing, resilient prepositioning, and complex multinational coordination to address dispersed mission sets and alliance frameworks. Here, logistics planners prioritize flexible warehousing solutions and cross-border customs facilitation to maintain readiness in dynamic political contexts. In the Asia-Pacific region, vast distances, diverse port and airlift capacities, and increasing emphasis on distributed maritime and joint operations drive investments in forward logistics nodes, expeditionary warehousing concepts, and more frequent rotational sustainment flows. Across regions, infrastructure constraints, supplier ecosystems, and regulatory regimes collectively determine feasible sourcing strategies and the degree to which automation and digital visibility can be scaled into operational practice.
Actionable commercial intelligence on supplier capabilities, collaboration patterns, technology adoption, and compliance strengths shaping competitive positioning in defense logistics
Key companies insights reveal common patterns in capability development, partnership structures, and technology adoption. Leading contractors and logistics providers are increasingly packaging integrated offerings that combine end-to-end inventory visibility, predictive maintenance analytics, and turnkey distribution services. These firms are competing on latency reduction, digital interoperability, and contract vehicles that align incentives toward measurable readiness outcomes. At the same time, smaller and midsize providers are carving niche positions by specializing in rapid deployment logistics, component-level overhaul, or regional warehousing networks that support agile force posture.
Strategic collaborations are becoming more prevalent, with prime contractors partnering with technology firms, specialized MRO providers, and regional logistics operators to assemble capability stacks that address complex sustainment requirements. Investment in secure data exchange, common standards for parts traceability, and certified repair workflows is accelerating as organizations seek to reduce lifecycle risk. Additionally, companies that demonstrate strong compliance management and tariff-aware sourcing are winning preference in procurement processes that weigh supply chain resilience alongside price. For defense buyers, the evolving vendor landscape requires rigorous due diligence on service level commitments, talent pipelines, and the ability to scale demonstrable outcomes across joint and coalition environments.
Practical, high-impact recommendations for defense logistics leaders to enhance resilience, integrate digital maintenance solutions, diversify suppliers, and reform contracting for measurable outcomes
Industry leaders should prioritize a series of pragmatic actions to align logistics capability with operational risk and fiscal constraints. First, embed tariff and trade-risk considerations into strategic sourcing decisions and contract language so that supplier selection and inventory policies proactively mitigate exposure. Second, accelerate adoption of predictive maintenance and inventory automation where the productivity gains can be directly mapped to readiness improvements, while ensuring that digital solutions are implemented with appropriate cybersecurity and interoperability controls.
Third, restructure contracting approaches to incentivize performance outcomes, including outcome-based milestones that tie payments to readiness metrics, but couple those approaches with robust governance and clear data-sharing protocols. Fourth, diversify supplier ecosystems by qualifying regional vendors and establishing certified subcontractor pools to reduce single-source dependencies and accelerate surge capacity. Fifth, invest in cross-functional training and center-of-excellence constructs that integrate program offices, logistics commands, and procurement teams to improve decision cadence and consistency. Finally, pilot modular warehousing and multimodal transportation concepts in selected theaters to validate concepts of operation before broader rollout. Collectively, these actions improve resilience and maintainability while positioning organizations to respond more nimbly to operational and fiscal shocks.
Transparent and reproducible research methodology combining senior stakeholder interviews, documentary analysis, and comparative case synthesis to underpin defensible logistics conclusions
The research methodology underpinning this analysis blends primary engagement, documentary review, and structured synthesis to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary inputs included interviews with senior logistics and procurement officials, program managers, and supply chain leaders across services and defense agencies, providing direct insight into doctrine, sustainment pain points, and procurement preferences. Secondary sources encompassed publicly available policy documents, procurement regulations, customs and tariff notices, technical standards, and supplier capability statements that inform the operational and regulatory context for logistics decision-making.
Analytical methods combined qualitative thematic analysis with comparative case review to identify recurring patterns in supplier behavior, contractual innovation, and logistics design. Cross-validation occurred by triangulating interview findings with documented procurement outcomes and observed supplier investments in automation and maintenance technologies. Ethical considerations and source attribution guided the synthesis, and care was taken to avoid proprietary disclosures. The methodology emphasizes transparency of assumptions, reproducibility of thematic coding, and clear linkage between evidence and conclusion to support defensible recommendations for programmatic action.
Concise concluding synthesis highlighting the imperative to integrate contracting, digital maintenance, and regional logistics posture to secure operational sustainment outcomes
In conclusion, defense logistics is at an inflection point where operational demands, commercial practices, and regulatory pressures converge to shape sustainment outcomes. The interplay of automation, contract innovation, regional infrastructure, and trade policy necessitates holistic approaches that integrate procurement, maintenance, transportation, and warehousing decisions. Leaders who align sourcing strategy with platform and theater-specific requirements, while embedding resilience into contracts and supplier ecosystems, will be better positioned to sustain high-tempo operations and manage lifecycle risk.
Moving forward, incremental pilots that demonstrate measurable readiness improvements, coupled with disciplined supplier qualification and tariff-aware sourcing, provide a pragmatic path to broader transformation. Continued emphasis on standards for data interoperability, secure information exchange, and maintenance certification will further enable scalable logistics modernization. Ultimately, the combination of adaptive contracting, targeted technology investment, and regionalized logistics posturing will determine how effectively organizations translate strategic intent into dependable operational sustainment.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integrating predictive analytics and AI-driven demand forecasting for defense supply chains
- 5.2. Deploying blockchain-enabled inventory management to enhance security and traceability
- 5.3. Implementing unmanned autonomous resupply vehicles to reduce frontline logistics burden
- 5.4. Adopting on-demand additive manufacturing technologies for rapid deployment of spare parts
- 5.5. Leveraging IoT sensors and edge computing for real-time asset tracking across global supply routes
- 5.6. Enhancing cybersecurity protocols to protect logistics networks from sophisticated state-sponsored threats
- 5.7. Formulating resilient multi-modal supply chain strategies to mitigate geopolitical disruption risks
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Defense Logistics Market, by Service Type
- 8.1. Inventory Management
- 8.1.1. Automated Inventory Management
- 8.1.2. Manual Inventory Management
- 8.2. Maintenance Repair And Overhaul
- 8.2.1. Corrective Maintenance
- 8.2.2. Predictive Maintenance
- 8.2.3. Preventive Maintenance
- 8.3. Packaging And Handling
- 8.4. Procurement And Sourcing
- 8.5. Transportation
- 8.5.1. Air Transportation
- 8.5.2. Land Transportation
- 8.5.3. Sea Transportation
- 8.6. Warehousing And Distribution
- 8.6.1. Bonded Warehousing
- 8.6.2. Cross Docking
- 8.6.3. Non Bonded Warehousing
- 9. Defense Logistics Market, by Platform
- 9.1. Air
- 9.2. Land
- 9.3. Sea
- 9.4. Space
- 10. Defense Logistics Market, by Contract Type
- 10.1. Cost Reimbursable
- 10.2. Fixed Price
- 10.3. Time And Material
- 11. Defense Logistics Market, by Ownership Model
- 11.1. In House
- 11.2. Outsourced
- 11.2.1. Prime Contractor
- 11.2.1.1. Large Prime Contractor
- 11.2.1.2. Small And Midsize Prime Contractor
- 11.2.2. Subcontractor
- 11.2.3. Third Party Logistics Provider
- 12. Defense Logistics Market, by End User
- 12.1. Air Force
- 12.2. Army
- 12.3. Defense Agencies
- 12.4. Marine Corps
- 12.5. Navy
- 13. Defense Logistics Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Defense Logistics Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Defense Logistics Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 16.3.2. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 16.3.3. RTX Corporation
- 16.3.4. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 16.3.5. Leidos Holdings, Inc.
- 16.3.6. General Dynamics Corporation
- 16.3.7. Boeing Company
- 16.3.8. BAE Systems plc
- 16.3.9. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
- 16.3.10. CACI International Inc
- 16.3.11. Science Applications International Corporation
- 16.3.12. KBR, Inc.
- 16.3.13. Amentum Services, Inc.
- 16.3.14. ManTech International Corporation
- 16.3.15. V2X, Inc.
- 16.3.16. ASRC Federal Holding Company
- 16.3.17. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
- 16.3.18. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
