Report cover image

Data Center Cooling Market by Offering (Services, Solution), System Integration (Integrated Systems, Standalone Systems), Cooling Type, Power Rating, Data Center Type, End-User, Deployment Mode - Global Forecast 2025-2032

Publisher 360iResearch
Published Dec 01, 2025
Length 192 Pages
SKU # IRE20622079

Description

The Data Center Cooling Market was valued at USD 15.90 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 17.72 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 11.80%, reaching USD 38.83 billion by 2032.

Strategic Overview of the Data Center Cooling Landscape Amid Intensifying Digital Demand and Sustainability Pressures

The data center cooling landscape is undergoing a structural transformation as digital infrastructure becomes the backbone of modern economies. Rapid adoption of cloud services, surge in artificial intelligence workloads, and proliferation of edge locations are driving unprecedented power densities and thermal loads inside facilities of every size. As a result, cooling is no longer a peripheral engineering concern; it is now a strategic lever that influences uptime, operating cost, sustainability performance, and competitive differentiation.

Across the value chain, operators and technology providers are confronting simultaneous pressures. On one side, customers demand higher performance, ultra-low latency, and always-on service delivery. On the other, regulators, investors, and communities are insisting on demonstrable reductions in energy consumption, carbon emissions, and water use. Cooling systems sit at the intersection of these forces because they are among the largest consumers of energy in a data center and a key determinant of facility efficiency.

Within this context, solutions and services for thermal management are evolving at pace. Traditional room-based air conditioning architectures coexist with advanced liquid cooling designs, high-efficiency chillers, free-cooling economizers, and AI-optimized control platforms. At the same time, service portfolios that include consulting, installation and deployment, and maintenance and support are expanding to help operators navigate complex technology choices and regulatory requirements. The strategic challenge is no longer simply to remove heat, but to orchestrate a resilient, modular, and sustainable cooling ecosystem aligned with long-term digital growth.

This executive summary provides a high-level view of how these forces are reshaping the market. It examines the transformative shifts in technology and design, the implications of evolving tariff policies in the United States, and the nuanced dynamics across offerings, system integration models, cooling types, power ratings, data center categories, end-user industries, deployment modes, and regions. It also highlights how leading companies are repositioning and concludes with actionable guidance to help decision-makers structure their investment priorities over the coming planning horizon.

Transformative Shifts Redefining Cooling Architectures, Workloads, and Sustainability Expectations in Modern Data Centers

The most consequential shift in data center cooling is the transition from static, one-size-fits-all architectures to highly adaptive, workload-aware systems. As computing environments become more heterogeneous, with AI accelerators, high-performance computing clusters, and memory-intensive applications operating alongside conventional IT loads, thermal profiles are becoming more uneven and dynamic. This evolution is accelerating the move from traditional room-based cooling towards row and rack-based strategies that place cooling capacity closer to the heat source, enabling more precise airflow control, reduced energy waste, and tighter temperature tolerances.

Simultaneously, there is a decisive pivot from purely air-based approaches to a broader mix of technologies, including rear-door heat exchangers, direct-to-chip liquid cooling, and immersion solutions. For many operators, these liquid cooling systems are being adopted initially in targeted high-density zones, while air conditioning, chilling units, cooling towers, and economizer systems continue to support the bulk of legacy and mixed-density workloads. Over time, hybrid environments that blend various solution types are becoming the norm, supported by intelligent control systems capable of coordinating multiple cooling assets in real time.

Another transformative trend is the deep integration of cooling with facility-wide energy management and sustainability strategies. Operators of enterprise, colocation, hyperscale, edge, telecom, cloud, and high-performance computing data centers are increasingly treating cooling as a critical fulcrum for achieving energy efficiency and emission-reduction goals. Free-cooling economizers, heat recovery schemes that redirect waste heat to district heating networks or adjacent buildings, and optimization algorithms driven by machine learning are being deployed to reduce the energy intensity of cooling while preserving or enhancing reliability.

Service offerings are also evolving in response to the growing complexity of cooling ecosystems. Consulting services now extend beyond basic design advice toward holistic assessments of thermal performance, power rating alignment, and risk management for both new construction and retrofit projects. Installation and deployment services must accommodate integrated systems that tie cooling closely to building management and DCIM platforms, as well as standalone systems introduced into brownfield sites with constrained layouts. Maintenance and support are shifting from reactive break-fix models to predictive and condition-based approaches, harnessing sensor data and analytics to prevent downtime and maintain optimal performance.

On the architectural front, integrated systems are gaining momentum in large-scale and hyperscale environments where standardization, automation, and lifecycle optimization are priorities. These integrated configurations allow for centralized monitoring and control of cooling, power, and environmental parameters, reducing operational complexity and enhancing resilience. At the same time, standalone systems retain relevance in smaller enterprise facilities, modular edge sites, and highly specialized deployments where flexibility and incremental investment are paramount. This dual-track evolution underscores the need for tailored strategies that consider not only current load profiles but also planned expansions and emerging workloads.

Moreover, the role of cooling in supporting business continuity and regulatory compliance is expanding. In sectors such as banking, financial services and insurance, healthcare and life sciences, and government and defense, stringent uptime and data protection requirements are pushing operators toward redundant, fault-tolerant cooling configurations. In energy and utilities, manufacturing, IT and telecommunication, and retail and e-commerce, cooling decisions are increasingly linked to broader digital transformation programs and decarbonization roadmaps. Collectively, these shifts are redefining cooling from a background utility into a central pillar of digital infrastructure strategy.

Evolving United States Tariff Pressures Through 2025 Are Reshaping Cooling Procurement, Sourcing Resilience, and TCO

United States trade policy, and particularly the cumulative impact of tariffs expected to remain in focus through 2025, is reshaping cost structures and sourcing strategies for data center cooling equipment and components. While policy specifics continue to evolve, operators and technology suppliers are already adapting to a landscape where imported equipment such as chillers, cooling towers, specialized heat exchangers, pumps, control electronics, and certain liquid cooling components may face higher landed costs and longer lead times. This is prompting closer scrutiny of total cost of ownership and greater emphasis on flexibility in procurement.

Tariff-related cost pressures are amplifying the importance of robust services. Consulting teams are being called upon to evaluate alternative solution combinations, compare domestically sourced and imported technologies, and model lifetime operational savings that can offset higher upfront capital expenditures. In many cases, the optimal path involves rebalancing portfolios across air conditioning, chilling units, cooling towers, economizer systems, and liquid cooling systems rather than relying heavily on a single category that might be more exposed to tariffs or supply chain bottlenecks.

For installation and deployment, tariffs are encouraging earlier and more detailed planning. Data center operators pursuing new construction or retrofit projects in the United States are engaging integrators sooner to secure critical components, align with domestic manufacturing capacity where feasible, and design architectures that can accommodate component substitutions without compromising performance. Standardization on modular, integrated systems enables greater resilience to policy-driven disruptions because it allows key elements to be swapped with functional equivalents from different suppliers or regions.

Maintenance and support strategies are also being reevaluated under the shadow of potential cost volatility. To mitigate the risk of expensive imported spare parts or delayed shipments, operators are expanding local inventories of critical components, renegotiating service-level agreements with vendors, and exploring predictive maintenance capabilities that reduce unplanned outages and emergency repairs. While such measures carry their own costs, they can soften the operational impact of tariffs by reducing downtime and avoiding last-minute procurement at unfavorable price points.

At a broader level, the tariff environment is driving a more granular segmentation of sourcing decisions. Hyperscale and large colocation providers are better positioned to leverage their volume to negotiate favorable terms or encourage suppliers to localize manufacturing, whereas smaller enterprise and edge operators may feel tariff impacts more acutely. In response, some suppliers are diversifying manufacturing footprints across the Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and Asia-Pacific, attempting to optimize logistics and reduce exposure to any single tariff regime.

Despite these challenges, tariffs are also catalyzing innovation. As imported components grow more expensive or uncertain, interest in highly efficient systems that reduce long-term energy consumption has intensified. Solutions that deliver superior thermal performance at lower operating cost become more attractive even with higher capital expenditure. This shift incentivizes adoption of advanced cooling towers, high-efficiency chillers, and liquid cooling solutions in dense compute environments, particularly where power availability and sustainability commitments are tightly constrained. In effect, tariffs are nudging the market toward designs that are both more efficient and more strategically resilient.

Key Segmentation Insights Reveal How Offerings, Architectures, and Use Cases Converge to Shape Cooling Strategies

Understanding the structure of the data center cooling market requires a close examination of how different offerings, architectures, and usage contexts interact. On the offering dimension, the market revolves around a dynamic interplay between solutions and services. Solution categories such as air conditioning, chilling units, cooling towers, economizer systems, and liquid cooling systems define the technical backbone of cooling infrastructure. Each plays a distinct role depending on the density profile, climate conditions, and efficiency targets of the facility. Air conditioning remains foundational in many room-based environments, while chilling units and cooling towers are critical for large-scale facilities seeking robust, centralized thermal rejection. Economizer systems become especially important in regions and sites that can exploit favorable ambient conditions, while liquid cooling systems increasingly target high-density racks in hyperscale and high-performance computing environments.

Services, encompassing consulting, installation and deployment, and maintenance and support, are emerging as decisive differentiators rather than optional add-ons. Consulting services are vital for aligning solution choice with business objectives, regulatory requirements, and the unique needs of enterprise, colocation, cloud, telecom, and edge facilities. Installation and deployment services determine how effectively integrated systems or standalone systems are implemented, influencing time to market and long-term reliability. Maintenance and support, in turn, shape the lifecycle performance of cooling assets, which is particularly important in sectors such as banking, financial services and insurance, healthcare and life sciences, government and defense, and manufacturing where uptime and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable.

From a system integration perspective, integrated systems are increasingly favored in large enterprise, colocation, hyperscale, and cloud data centers where centralized control, remote monitoring, and consistent performance across multiple sites are strategic priorities. These environments benefit from holistic visibility into interactions between cooling, power, and IT load, often using automation and analytics to fine-tune performance. Standalone systems, however, maintain a strong position in smaller enterprise facilities, modular edge data centers, and telecom nodes where localized decision-making, incremental upgrades, and rapid deployment are more critical than full-scale integration.

Cooling type offers another layer of strategic insight. Room-based cooling, which traditionally dominates legacy and lower-density environments, continues to serve as a cost-effective option for many enterprise data centers that do not yet face extreme thermal loads. However, the emergence of AI accelerators and storage-intensive applications is pushing more operators toward row and rack-based cooling, which delivers more targeted airflow or liquid contact to high-density racks. This shift is particularly pronounced in high-performance computing and hyperscale data centers, where the mismatch between traditional room-based systems and concentrated hotspots can lead to inefficiencies and risk of thermal throttling.

Power rating segmentation sheds light on differing design philosophies. Facilities below 1MW, often including smaller enterprise, edge, and specialized telecom sites, prioritize compact, flexible, and sometimes standalone cooling solutions capable of operating in constrained spaces. Data centers in the 1MW to 5MW segment typically balance scalability with cost efficiency, often adopting a mix of room-based and row or rack-based cooling supported by efficient chilling units and cooling towers. Above 5MW, large colocation and hyperscale facilities focus on economies of scale, advanced integration, and aggressive efficiency gains, making them leading candidates for liquid cooling deployments, sophisticated economizer strategies, and tightly integrated control architectures.

Differentiation by data center type reveals distinct cooling imperatives. Enterprise data centers often reflect a blend of legacy systems and incremental modernization, seeking solutions that can be integrated with existing infrastructure. Colocation data centers must satisfy a wide variety of tenant requirements, forcing them to maintain flexible, multi-tenant cooling architectures that can accommodate diverse power densities. Hyperscale data centers, in contrast, prioritize standardized, repeatable cooling designs that can be rapidly replicated across regions while achieving world-class efficiency metrics. Edge data centers and telecom data centers emphasize compactness, remote manageability, and resilience to environmental variability, while cloud data centers and high-performance computing data centers focus on handling high-density compute clusters with stringent latency and performance expectations.

Segmentation by end-user vertical further refines these patterns. Banking, financial services and insurance organizations demand robust resilience and strong disaster recovery, steering them toward redundant cooling pathways and proactive maintenance. Energy and utilities operators often deploy data centers that support grid management and critical infrastructure, making ruggedized cooling and resistance to ambient fluctuations important. Government and defense facilities prioritize security and continuity under adverse conditions, often favoring integrated systems with strict access controls. Healthcare and life sciences use cases, particularly those involving medical imaging and genomics, frequently rely on high-performance computing, which intensifies the need for advanced row, rack-based, or liquid cooling in specific zones.

IT and telecommunication providers sit at the center of digital networks and cloud ecosystems, requiring highly scalable cooling that can track rapid traffic and workload growth. Manufacturing facilities use data centers to power automation, quality control, and digital twins, placing a premium on cooling systems that integrate smoothly with broader industrial environments. Retail and e-commerce organizations depend on data centers for real-time inventory, recommendation engines, and transaction processing, leading to a focus on cost-efficient yet resilient cooling that can support peak-season surges without compromising service.

Finally, the distinction between new construction and retrofit deployment modes underscores how maturity and legacy constraints shape cooling strategies. New construction projects provide the opportunity to adopt integrated systems, advanced liquid cooling, and optimized airflow patterns from the ground up, often enabling more ambitious efficiency targets. Retrofit projects, however, dominate in regions and segments with substantial existing capacity. In these settings, operators prioritize upgrades that deliver meaningful efficiency and reliability gains while fitting within existing power, space, and structural limits. This often leads to selective deployment of row or rack-based cooling, targeted introduction of economizer systems, and careful replacement of older chilling units and cooling towers with higher-efficiency models.

Regional Dynamics Across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific Drive Divergent but Converging Paths in Cooling Innovation

Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on how data center cooling strategies are conceived, financed, and implemented. In the Americas, large cloud and hyperscale providers, along with a mature colocation ecosystem, play an outsized role in setting technology direction. North America, in particular, hosts some of the most advanced deployments of integrated systems, liquid cooling, and AI-driven optimization, as major operators respond to escalating energy prices, corporate sustainability commitments, and the rapid adoption of compute-intensive AI workloads. Climate variability across the region, from cold northern climates to hot southern zones, encourages diversified use of economizer systems and carefully tuned combinations of chilling units and cooling towers.

In Latin American markets, infrastructure investment is expanding as digital services proliferate and internet penetration rises. Here, new construction projects often leapfrog older design conventions, adopting more efficient cooling solutions from the outset to compensate for grid constraints and higher relative energy costs. Colocation and telecom data centers serving rapidly urbanizing populations emphasize modular, scalable architectures that balance resilience with cost sensitivity. Across the Americas, regulatory frameworks and incentives that favor energy-efficient technologies further accelerate the adoption of advanced cooling solutions.

Europe, the Middle East and Africa present a highly heterogeneous landscape, shaped by diverse climates, regulatory regimes, and maturity levels. In Western and Northern Europe, stringent energy efficiency and environmental standards have driven aggressive efforts to lower the energy intensity of cooling. Operators in these regions are at the forefront of employing free-cooling economizers, district heating integration via waste heat recovery, and advanced liquid cooling in high-density zones. Data center clusters in countries with cool climates benefit particularly from extended free-cooling windows, enabling significant reductions in chiller runtime.

In Southern Europe and parts of the Middle East and Africa, high ambient temperatures and water scarcity challenge traditional cooling approaches. As a result, there is greater focus on high-efficiency chilling units, dry or hybrid cooling towers, and control strategies that limit water consumption while safeguarding thermal performance. Emerging data center hubs in the Middle East capitalize on large-scale, purpose-built facilities where integrated systems, advanced monitoring, and resilience to extreme temperatures are planned from inception. African markets, still at earlier stages of build-out in many countries, tend to rely on robust, flexible, and sometimes standalone systems that can adapt to grid variability and limited technical resources.

Asia-Pacific is one of the most dynamic regions for data center expansion, driven by rapid digitization, e-commerce growth, and the rising adoption of cloud and AI across enterprises and consumers. In established hubs such as parts of East Asia, advanced hyperscale and colocation facilities push the adoption of high-efficiency cooling, including integrated systems, optimized airflow management, and targeted use of liquid cooling for high-density racks. Space constraints in dense urban areas increase the appeal of compact, rack-focused solutions and modular designs.

In fast-growing markets across Southeast Asia and South Asia, high humidity and temperature profiles place heavy demands on cooling infrastructure. Operators in these regions are increasingly exploring combinations of efficient chilling units, advanced cooling towers, and control algorithms that balance power usage with reliability. New construction projects often feature aggressive efficiency targets to mitigate energy cost exposure, while retrofit projects focus on upgrading legacy air conditioning systems and introducing row-based solutions to support new workloads. Across Asia-Pacific, government digital economy initiatives, data localization requirements, and evolving environmental standards collectively shape cooling investment decisions and the pace of modernization.

Leading Cooling Providers Compete on Efficiency, Integration, and Services as Innovation Cycles Accelerate

Competitive activity in data center cooling is defined by a blend of established infrastructure providers, emerging innovators, and specialist service firms striving to differentiate across technology performance, energy efficiency, integration capabilities, and lifecycle support. Established manufacturers of air conditioning systems, chilling units, and cooling towers are expanding their portfolios to include higher-efficiency models, advanced controls, and compatibility with both integrated and standalone system architectures. Many are also investing heavily in digital overlays, such as remote monitoring, predictive maintenance analytics, and integration with data center infrastructure management platforms, to deepen their value proposition beyond hardware.

At the same time, specialized providers of liquid cooling systems are rapidly gaining visibility, especially among hyperscale, cloud, and high-performance computing operators confronting unprecedented rack densities. These companies are pushing the boundaries of direct-to-chip, rear-door, and immersion cooling technologies, focusing on safe fluids, efficient heat exchangers, and interoperable manifolds that can slot into existing racks and power distributions. Partnerships between liquid cooling vendors and server manufacturers are becoming more common, enabling optimized reference designs for AI and GPU-heavy deployments that can be deployed at scale.

Service-centric players are also carving out important roles in the ecosystem. Consulting and engineering firms with deep thermal expertise are advising on everything from airflow optimization and containment strategies to transition roadmaps toward more advanced cooling architectures. Installation and deployment specialists increasingly focus on orchestrating complex multi-vendor environments, ensuring that integrated systems, standalone elements, and building infrastructure work seamlessly together. Vendors that can provide comprehensive maintenance and support contracts, including spare parts logistics and guaranteed response times, are well positioned to win long-term relationships, particularly in mission-critical sectors such as banking, healthcare, government, and telecom.

Strategic alliances, joint ventures, and technology partnerships are becoming central to competitive differentiation. Cooling equipment manufacturers are collaborating with chip designers, server vendors, and cloud platforms to ensure their systems can accommodate evolving power densities and thermal envelopes. In parallel, partnerships with software providers enable the incorporation of AI and machine learning into control systems, improving the ability to predict thermal behavior, manage dynamic workloads, and minimize energy consumption without compromising resilience.

Another emerging competitive dimension involves sustainability credentials. Companies are being evaluated not only on the efficiency of their solutions but also on their broader environmental impact, including refrigerant choices, lifecycle emissions, and water usage. Vendors that can demonstrate strong performance on sustainability metrics, provide transparent documentation, and support customer reporting requirements are gaining an edge in procurement decisions. This is especially true for global operators that must align with corporate environmental, social, and governance targets and satisfy evolving regulatory expectations.

Overall, leading companies in the data center cooling ecosystem are converging on a set of core capabilities: advanced hardware engineered for high-density and diverse climates, integrated and interoperable control platforms, deep service and consulting expertise, and credible sustainability performance. Competitors that lack one or more of these pillars risk being sidelined as customers increasingly favor ecosystem partners capable of supporting their full lifecycle-from design and build through optimization, expansion, and eventual modernization.

Actionable Strategies to Align Cooling Investments With Digital Growth, Risk Management, and Sustainability Objectives

Industry leaders seeking to navigate the evolving data center cooling landscape should prioritize a structured, multi-horizon strategy that aligns immediate operational needs with long-term infrastructure resilience. A practical starting point is to perform a comprehensive assessment of existing cooling assets, including air conditioning systems, chilling units, cooling towers, economizer systems, and any deployed liquid cooling technologies. This assessment should map performance against key metrics such as reliability, energy use, water consumption, and maintenance requirements while considering future workload scenarios that incorporate AI, high-performance computing, and edge expansion.

In parallel, decision-makers should refine their architectural choices between integrated and standalone systems. For large enterprise, colocation, hyperscale, cloud, and high-performance computing data centers, there is a compelling case to standardize on integrated systems that offer centralized visibility and control across multiple sites. These platforms enable cross-facility optimization, support advanced analytics, and facilitate smoother response to tariff-driven supply chain disruptions by making it easier to substitute functionally equivalent components. Smaller enterprise and edge environments, however, may continue to benefit from carefully selected standalone systems that prioritize deployment speed and localized fault isolation.

Leaders should also revisit their cooling type strategy in anticipation of growing rack densities. Investments in containment, airflow management, and row or rack-based cooling should be evaluated for areas of the facility that support the most demanding workloads. For operators already facing hot spots or constrained capacity in specific zones, targeted introduction of liquid cooling systems-such as direct-to-chip or rear-door heat exchangers-can provide significant relief while minimizing disruption. These investments can be phased in over time, aligning with server refresh cycles and new application rollouts.

On the power rating dimension, operators should ensure that their cooling strategies scale effectively from below 1MW edge and remote sites through to 1MW to 5MW regional facilities and above 5MW central hubs. This means adopting modular cooling designs that support incremental expansion, especially in colocation and cloud environments where demand patterns may be volatile. It also implies careful coordination between cooling design and power distribution planning to avoid bottlenecks that could constrain growth. Engineering teams should regularly update scenarios that link cooling capacity, power availability, and IT load forecasts to guide investment timing.

End-user organizations across banking and financial services, energy and utilities, government and defense, healthcare and life sciences, IT and telecommunication, manufacturing, and retail and e-commerce should embed cooling decisions into broader digital transformation and sustainability programs. For example, when planning new analytics, AI, or automation projects, technology and facilities teams should jointly evaluate whether existing cooling infrastructure can accommodate the expected thermal load. Similarly, when setting sustainability targets, leaders should quantify the role that more efficient cooling solutions, improved economizer operation, and heat recovery can play in achieving emission reductions.

Finally, procurement and vendor management practices need to reflect the growing strategic importance of cooling. Rather than treating cooling equipment as a one-time capital purchase, leaders should seek long-term partnerships with providers that can deliver consulting, installation and deployment, and maintenance and support across the lifecycle. Contracts should encourage continuous improvement, incentivize energy and water savings, and include clear performance benchmarks. By combining rigorous technical evaluation with collaborative vendor relationships, industry leaders can position their data centers to remain resilient, efficient, and adaptable in the face of shifting tariff regimes, accelerating digital demand, and tightening environmental expectations.

Robust, Multi-Source Research Framework Underpins Strategic Insights Into the Evolving Data Center Cooling Ecosystem

The insights presented in this executive summary are grounded in a structured research methodology designed to capture the complexity of the global data center cooling ecosystem. The analytical process begins with a detailed mapping of the value chain, encompassing solution providers for air conditioning, chilling units, cooling towers, economizer systems, and liquid cooling systems, along with service providers specializing in consulting, installation and deployment, and maintenance and support. Particular attention is given to how these players interact with data center operators across enterprise, colocation, hyperscale, edge, telecom, cloud, and high-performance computing environments.

Primary information is obtained through ongoing engagement with industry stakeholders, including technology vendors, integrators, facility operators, and subject-matter experts who contribute insights on adoption patterns, emerging use cases, and practical challenges. These perspectives help clarify how decisions are made across different power rating bands, from below 1MW to the 1MW to 5MW segment and above 5MW, and how cooling type preferences evolve as workloads and

Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year

Table of Contents

192 Pages
1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Adoption of liquid immersion cooling solutions for high-density compute workloads
5.2. Integration of AI-driven thermal management platforms to optimize energy consumption and reduce PUE
5.3. Deployment of modular turnkey cooling units supporting scalable edge data center infrastructure
5.4. Use of recycled and low-global-warming-potential refrigerants to meet sustainability regulations
5.5. Implementation of thermal energy storage systems to shift cooling loads to off-peak hours
5.6. Development of hybrid air and liquid cooling architectures for improved redundancy and efficiency
5.7. Rising deployment of direct-to-chip liquid cooling for AI and GPU-intensive clusters in hyperscale data centers
5.8. Accelerating shift toward water-free and refrigerant-free cooling designs to address water scarcity and environmental constraints
5.9. Growing use of advanced computational fluid dynamics modeling to optimize airflow management and rack layout in legacy facilities
5.10. Increased integration of building management systems with data center cooling controls for real-time holistic facility optimization
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Data Center Cooling Market, by Offering
8.1. Services
8.1.1. Consulting
8.1.2. Installation & Deployment
8.1.3. Maintenance & Support
8.2. Solution
8.2.1. Air Conditioning
8.2.2. Chilling Units
8.2.3. Cooling Towers
8.2.4. Economizer Systems
8.2.5. Liquid Cooling Systems
9. Data Center Cooling Market, by System Integration
9.1. Integrated Systems
9.2. Standalone Systems
10. Data Center Cooling Market, by Cooling Type
10.1. Room-based Cooling
10.2. Row/Rack-based Cooling
11. Data Center Cooling Market, by Power Rating
11.1. 1MW to 5MW
11.2. Above 5MW
11.3. Below 1MW
12. Data Center Cooling Market, by Data Center Type
12.1. Enterprise Data Centers
12.2. Colocation Data Centers
12.3. Hyperscale Data Centers
12.4. Edge Data Centers
12.5. Telecom Data Centers
12.6. Cloud Data Centers
12.7. High-Performance Computing Data Centers
13. Data Center Cooling Market, by End-User
13.1. Banking, Financial Services & Insurance
13.2. Energy And Utilities
13.3. Government & Defense
13.4. Healthcare And Life Sciences
13.5. IT & Telecommunication
13.6. Manufacturing
13.7. Retail And E-Commerce
14. Data Center Cooling Market, by Deployment Mode
14.1. New Construction
14.2. Retrofit
15. Data Center Cooling Market, by Region
15.1. Americas
15.1.1. North America
15.1.2. Latin America
15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
15.2.1. Europe
15.2.2. Middle East
15.2.3. Africa
15.3. Asia-Pacific
16. Data Center Cooling Market, by Group
16.1. ASEAN
16.2. GCC
16.3. European Union
16.4. BRICS
16.5. G7
16.6. NATO
17. Data Center Cooling Market, by Country
17.1. United States
17.2. Canada
17.3. Mexico
17.4. Brazil
17.5. United Kingdom
17.6. Germany
17.7. France
17.8. Russia
17.9. Italy
17.10. Spain
17.11. China
17.12. India
17.13. Japan
17.14. Australia
17.15. South Korea
18. Competitive Landscape
18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
18.3. Competitive Analysis
18.3.1. Schneider Electric SE
18.3.2. Vertiv Holdings Co.
18.3.3. ABB Ltd.
18.3.4. Aecorsis BV
18.3.5. Alfa Laval AB
18.3.6. Asetek A/S
18.3.7. Black Box Limited
18.3.8. Chilldyne Inc.
18.3.9. Coolcentric
18.3.10. Daikin Industries, Ltd.
18.3.11. Danfoss A/S
18.3.12. Dell Technologies Inc.
18.3.13. Delta Electronics, Inc.
18.3.14. Eaton Corporation PLC
18.3.15. Emerson Electric Co.
18.3.16. Exxon Mobil Corporation
18.3.17. Fujitsu Limited
18.3.18. Green Revolution Cooling, Inc.
18.3.19. Grundfos Holding A/S
18.3.20. Heatex AB
18.3.21. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
18.3.22. Hitachi, Ltd.
18.3.23. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
18.3.24. Hypertec Group Inc.
18.3.25. Iceotope
18.3.26. International Business Machines Corporation
18.3.27. Johnson Controls International PLC
18.3.28. Legrand S.A.
18.3.29. LG Corporation
18.3.30. LiquidStack Holding B.V.
18.3.31. LITE-ON Technology Corporation
18.3.32. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
18.3.33. Modine Manufacturing Company
18.3.34. Munters
18.3.35. Nortek Air Solutions, LLC
18.3.36. NTT Limited
18.3.37. Rittal GmbH & Co. KG
18.3.38. Schunk Group
18.3.39. Siemens AG
18.3.40. SPX Cooling Tech, LLC
18.3.41. STULZ GmbH
18.3.42. SWEP International AB by Dover Corporation
18.3.43. The Dow Chemical Company
18.3.44. Vigilent Corporation
How Do Licenses Work?
Request A Sample
Head shot

Questions or Comments?

Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.